Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2015 Sep 1;112(37):E5208–E5217. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511389112

MavN is a Legionella pneumophila vacuole-associated protein required for efficient iron acquisition during intracellular growth

Dervla T Isaac a,b, Rita K Laguna a, Nicole Valtz a,1, Ralph R Isberg a,b,2
PMCID: PMC4577140  PMID: 26330609

Significance

Limiting access of intracellular iron to intracellular microbes is a critical arm of the nutritional immune response. Little is known about the mechanisms used by intravacuolar pathogens to overcome this attempted starvation. We show here that Legionella pneumophila employs its major virulence-associated secretion system to deliver a unique transmembrane protein into host cells during infection. Utilizing microscopic, biochemical, and transcriptional analysis of intracellular bacteria, we demonstrate that the MavN protein integrates into the host-derived vacuolar membrane and facilitates transport of essential iron into the lumen of the vacuole to promote bacterial growth. These findings shed light on what is likely to be a myriad of strategies used by bacteria to overcome potent host nutrient restrictions.

Keywords: Legionella, iron, vacuole, MavN, Icm/Dot

Abstract

Iron is essential for the growth and virulence of most intravacuolar pathogens. The mechanisms by which microbes bypass host iron restriction to gain access to this metal across the host vacuolar membrane are poorly characterized. In this work, we identify a unique intracellular iron acquisition strategy used by Legionella pneumophila. The bacterial Icm/Dot (intracellular multiplication/defect in organelle trafficking) type IV secretion system targets the bacterial-derived MavN (more regions allowing vacuolar colocalization N) protein to the surface of the Legionella-containing vacuole where this putative transmembrane protein facilitates intravacuolar iron acquisition. The ΔmavN mutant exhibits a transcriptional iron-starvation signature before its growth is arrested during the very early stages of macrophage infection. This intracellular growth defect is rescued only by the addition of excess exogenous iron to the culture medium and not a variety of other metals. Consistent with MavN being a translocated substrate that plays an exclusive role during intracellular growth, the mutant shows no defect for growth in broth culture, even under severe iron-limiting conditions. Putative iron-binding residues within the MavN protein were identified, and point mutations in these residues resulted in defects specific for intracellular growth that are indistinguishable from the ΔmavN mutant. This model of a bacterial protein inserting into host membranes to mediate iron transport provides a paradigm for how intravacuolar pathogens can use virulence-associated secretion systems to manipulate and acquire host iron.


The etiological agent of Legionnaires’ disease pneumonia is Legionella pneumophila. The environmental reservoir for this intracellular pathogen is a diverse array of protozoan species that inhabit natural and man-made water sources (1). Human disease is initiated after inhalation of contaminated water droplets followed by Legionella replication within alveolar macrophages (2). Within host cells, Legionella establishes a membrane-bound, vacuolar compartment that closely associates with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (3). This compartment allows the pathogen to evade host antimicrobial defenses and replicate. The Icm/Dot (intracellular multiplication/defect in organelle trafficking) type IV secretion system (T4SS) of Legionella is essential for establishing this Legionella-containing vacuole (LCV), and mutants lacking this secretion system fail to replicate intracellularly (46). This system delivers ∼300 bacterial proteins into host cells, with a subset allowing Legionella to hijack host vesicle trafficking pathways, diverting the LCV toward interactions with mitochondria and the ER (3, 710). Other T4SS substrates play critical roles in hijacking host cell lipid metabolism, translation, and survival (11, 12). Although mutations within the Icm/Dot secretion apparatus abrogate intracellular replication, loss of any individual substrate typically has little or no effect on the outcome of infection. These results highlight the considerable functional redundancy among the Icm/Dot translocated substrates (IDTSs) (13).

Nutrient deprivation is a key host antimicrobial defense, of which iron restriction is a hallmark (14). Iron within mammalian cells is present in two forms. In its insoluble ferric [Fe(III)] form, the metal is solubilized by association with high-affinity iron-binding proteins such as ferritin or accessed via endocytosis of transferrin and lactoferrin from extracellular sources. In its soluble, bioavailable, and highly reactive form, ferrous ion [Fe(II)] is found within cytosol in the tightly regulated labile iron pool (LIP) (15). During intracellular growth, microbes must either release ferric iron from host proteins and reduce it to a readily bioavailable form or gain access to the cytosolic LIP (14). Intravacuolar pathogens, such as Legionella, have the further problem of needing a strategy for accessing either of these sources across the membrane barrier in which the microorganism resides.

Strikingly, the molecular mechanisms that allow Legionella to acquire iron across the vacuolar membrane remain a mystery. Intracellular compartments harboring Mycobacterium, Salmonella, and Leishmania species interact with the endocytic pathway, potentially allowing access to transferrin-bound iron (1623). The evasion of the endosomal pathway by the LCV, however, results in a compartment that lacks transferrin, indicating that Legionella must use previously unidentified mechanisms to access iron intracellularly (24).

Although the mechanisms of iron transport across the host membrane of the LCV are unknown, mechanisms of iron transport across the bacterial membrane during in vitro growth in broth culture have been elucidated. Ferrous iron import is mediated by the inner membrane transporter FeoB (25), whereas ferric iron acquisition is mediated by siderophores, low-molecular-weight iron scavengers. These siderophores are synthesized by LbtA (legiobactin A) and FrgA [iron (Fe)-repressed gene A] and are imported and exported via membrane transporters (2629). These proteins, however, are not required for intracellular replication, leaving unanswered the question of how Legionella gains access to essential iron within the LCV (25, 26, 28). Given the extensive role that the Icm/Dot T4SS plays in manipulating host biology during infection, it is possible that a secreted substrate could mediate the essential function of bringing iron into the vacuole. To date, however, there is no evidence that any of Legionella’s translocated substrates support iron acquisition across the vacuolar membrane.

A forward genetic screen identified two translocated proteins required for intracellular replication in macrophages, SdhA and MavN (previously called DimB) (3032). Loss of either protein displays a unique phenotype: a severe growth defect approaching levels observed for icm/dot mutants. The SdhA protein plays an important role in maintaining the integrity of the LCV and preventing inflammasome-mediated host cell death (32, 33). In this work, we demonstrate that the IDTS MavN is translocated into host cells and integrated within the host-derived LCV membrane, where it specifically plays an essential role in the vacuolar acquisition of iron by Legionella during infection. Our findings here provide evidence of a bacterial translocated protein that can facilitate iron transport across host membranes.

Results

MavN Is Required for Intracellular Replication of Legionella.

To assess the role of MavN in L. pneumophila infection, we generated an unmarked ΔmavN deletion strain using allelic exchange and measured its ability to replicate within permissive host cells (Fig. 1). The intracellular growth of the ΔmavN strain was severely impaired in both amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum, and primary A/J bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs), resulting in 130-fold and 1,200-fold less growth than the wild-type Legionella at 72 h postinfection (hpi), respectively (Fig. 1 A and B, compare ΔmavN to Lp02). The distinct lack of replication closely resembled the intracellular growth profile of the avirulent dotA strain (Lp03) that lacks a functional T4SS apparatus. Previous work had shown that the intracellular growth defect associated with a mavN insertion mutation is partially complemented in trans (34). We show here, however, that the growth defect of the ΔmavN mutant is rescued completely by plasmid-encoded mavN (pmavN), confirming that the intracellular growth defect we observe is due to the absence of MavN (Fig. 1 A and B). Unlike SdhA, which shows its distinctive growth defect only in murine macrophages, MavN is required for growth in both amoeba and primary macrophages, indicating that this protein is required for Legionella infection across a broad range of host cells.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

mavN is required for intracellular replication in multiple hosts. D. discoideum (A) and primary A/J BMDMs (B) were challenged with Lp02 (icm/dot+), Lp03 (dotA3), ΔmavN, or the complemented ΔmavN strain (ΔmavN+pmavN) at an MOI of 0.05. Intracellular growth was monitored over 72 h by enumeration of cfus. Data shown are representative of three independent infections. Mean ± SEM is plotted. (C and D) Primary BMDMs were challenged with the indicated Legionella strains at an MOI of 0.5. At 12 hpi (C) and 6 hpi (D), the macrophage monolayers were fixed and stained with anti-L. pneumophila antibody to distinguish between intracellular and extracellular bacteria (Materials and Methods). The number of bacteria per vacuole was counted, and the percentage of vacuoles that contained the indicated number of bacterial cells is shown. One hundred vacuoles for two replicate infections were counted. Graph shows data from three independent bacterial cultures. Mean ± SEM is shown.

To visualize intracellular growth within individual LCVs, we performed a microscopic analysis of primary BMDMs infected with Legionella, using staining with an anti-Legionella antibody. At 12 hpi, there was robust replication of the wild-type strain within macrophages, with 32% of the vacuoles harboring between five and nine bacteria and another 32% containing 10 or more bacteria (Fig. 1C, Lp02). In contrast, 92% of vacuoles generated by the ΔmavN mutant contained four or fewer bacteria (Fig. 1C). Although there was a profound growth defect, the intracellular accumulation of the ΔmavN mutant differed from that of the dotA mutant, which was completely incapable of intracellular replication (Fig. 1C, Lp03). This difference is consistent with the ΔmavN mutant undergoing 1–2 rounds of replication before growth arrest, because vacuoles generated by the mutant contained bacterial numbers similar to those containing wild-type Legionella at 6 hpi (Fig. 1D). Introduction of a wild-type copy of mavN completely restored intracellular replication of the ΔmavN mutant, with yields of bacteria at least as large as that observed for the wild-type strain after 12 h of infection (Fig. 1C).

Legionella manipulates host vesicle trafficking to form a replication-competent LCV that evades fusion with the lysosome and associates with the ER (3, 9, 10, 35). Mutants lacking Icm/Dot components fail to establish this association. Unlike the dotA mutant Lp03, the ΔmavN strain initially appeared to grow intracellularly before its replication was aborted (Fig. 1 C and D), consistent with successful establishment of an ER-associated vacuolar compartment. To determine if the LCV of the ΔmavN strain is associated with ER, postnuclear supernatants containing intact LCVs from infected cells were prepared and localization of the ER membrane protein calnexin around the LCV was analyzed microscopically. Similar to wild-type Legionella, calnexin colocalized with ΔmavN bacteria, suggesting that MavN does not play a role in LCV biogenesis (SI Appendix, Fig. S1).

MavN Is an Icm/Dot Substrate That Localizes to the Membrane of the LCV.

MavN is a hypothetical protein of unknown function that shares no sequence homology with characterized proteins in other organisms. BLAST analysis indicates that mavN is present only in the genomes of Legionella species and that of the closely related arthropod pathogen Ricketsiella grylii (36, 37). Hydropathy analysis predicts that MavN is a highly hydrophobic protein with several transmembrane domains, consistent with this protein functioning within cellular membranes (38).

Two independent studies demonstrated that the MavN protein has a carboxyl terminal translocation signal recognized by the Icm/Dot system and that it is likely translocated into host cells during infection (8, 39, 40). This indicates that MavN may directly interface with the host cell cytoplasm during intracellular growth. To demonstrate that full-length MavN translocates across the LCV during macrophage infection, we expressed plasmid-encoded 3xFLAG-tagged MavN (pmavN) in the wild-type (Lp02) and dotA (Lp03) strain backgrounds and assayed for translocation within BMDMs using immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 2A). The 3xFLAG-tagged MavN protein was functional and rescued the intracellular growth defect of the ΔmavN mutant, indicating that the tag did not interfere with intracellular growth (Fig. 1, ΔmavN+ pmavN). After challenge of BMDMs, 3xFLAG-MavN could be detected on ∼57% of vacuoles harboring the wild-type strain as early as 4 hpi (Fig. 2B, Lp02/pmavN). By 10 hpi, localization of MavN increased to 84% of the vacuoles. The FLAG staining had a morphology that was consistent with vacuolar membrane localization, as large LCVs at 10 hpi showed peripheral staining around bacterial clusters (Fig. 2A). In contrast, no FLAG staining was observed in association with vacuoles containing Lp03/pmavN at these time points (Fig. 2 A and B), despite robust expression of the tagged protein in both strain backgrounds (Fig. 2C). This indicates that localization of MavN in host cells requires a functional T4SS. Therefore, MavN is an Icm/Dot translocated protein that localizes and accumulates on the vacuolar membrane as replication proceeds.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

MavN is a translocated Icm/Dot substrate that localizes to the membrane of the LCV. (A) Primary A/J BMDMs were challenged with either Lp02 (WT)/pmavN or Lp03 (dotA3)/pmavN. At 4 and 10 hpi, macrophage monolayers were fixed and stained with anti-L. pneumophila (Lp) (red) and anti-FLAG (green). Insets represent 2× magnification of selected area. (Scale bars, 5 μm.) (B) Quantification of L. pneumophila/FLAG colocalization. nd, not detected. Data are displayed as the percentage of L. pneumophila vacuoles positively staining for 3xFLAG-MavN. One hundred vacuoles from two replicate infections were counted. Graph shows data from three independent bacterial cultures. Mean ± SEM is shown. (C) Crude lysates were prepared from Lp02/pmavN and Lp03/pmavN grown overnight in AYE + 0.5 mM IPTG before bacterial challenge. Western blot analysis was used to determine the expression of FLAG-MavN in both strains using an anti-FLAG antibody. Anti-DotF was used as a loading control. (D) U937 macrophages were challenged with either Lp02/pFLAG or Lp02/pmavN. Postnuclear supernatants were prepared from cells at 6 hpi, adhered to poly-lysine–coated coverslips, and stained with indicated antibodies. Before membrane permeabilization with methanol, coverslips were stained with anti-FLAG antibody (outside FLAG) (green) and rat anti-L. pneumophila antibody (blue). After permeabilization, cells were stained with rabbit anti-L. pneumophila antibody (inside Lp) (red) (Materials and Methods). (Scale bars, 5 μm.) (E) Icm/Dot-dependent localization of MavN to host cell membranes during infection. U937 macrophages were infected with the indicated strain at an MOI of 5. At 6 hpi, infected macrophages were mechanically lysed, and the cytosolic fraction was collected. Proteins were selectively extracted and solubilized from the host membrane fraction using digitonin. Fractions were analyzed by immunoblotting with indicated antibodies.

To determine if MavN localizes to the surface of the LCV, we prepared postnuclear supernatants containing intact LCVs from human macrophages challenged with Legionella. Intact vacuoles were stained, in the absence of permeabilization, with an anti-FLAG antibody. At 6 hpi, vacuoles isolated from macrophages infected with wild-type Legionella expressing 3xFLAG-MavN showed robust staining around the vacuolar periphery (Fig. 2D, Lp02/pmavN). In contrast, macrophages infected with Legionella harboring only the 3xFLAG epitope contained vacuoles devoid of FLAG staining, indicating that the FLAG staining pattern was a consequence of MavN localization. These data also showed that MavN was exposed on the cytosolic surface of the LCV because no staining of luminal Legionella with anti-Legionella antibody could be observed until after membrane permeabilization with methanol [Fig. 2D, Legionella (outside) vs. Legionella (inside)]. Thus, the N-terminal 3xFLAG epitope on MavN was detected on the surface of intact LCVs. We also confirmed the host membrane localization of MavN biochemically by mechanically separating the cytosolic and membrane fractions after bacterial challenge of human macrophages, selectively solubilizing proteins from host membranes using digitonin extraction, and probing for 3xFLAG-MavN. MavN was present in the digitonin-soluble membrane fraction, indicating that it was extracted from cholesterol-containing host membranes (Fig. 2E). Calnexin, an ER transmembrane protein that localizes to the LCV membrane, was also detected in the digitonin-soluble fraction, demonstrating the effectiveness of this technique. Consistent with MavN being an Icm/Dot T4SS substrate, it was not detected in the membranes of macrophages challenged with Lp03/pmavN, a T4SS-deficient Legionella strain. As a control for bacterial contamination, the abundant Legionella protein DotF was not observed in the digitonin-soluble membrane fraction. Taken together, the microscopic and biochemical analysis indicates that MavN integrates into the host LCV membrane during intracellular replication.

The ΔmavN Mutant Is Iron-Starved During Macrophage Infection.

The intracellular growth defect of the ΔmavN mutant is not the result of aberrant vacuolar trafficking (SI Appendix, Fig. S1), and the mutant appeared to initiate intracellular replication with normal kinetics before its growth was arrested at ∼6 hpi (Fig. 1 C and D). Replication that aborts in this fashion could be due to the host immune response, a general stress response of the mutant, or starvation of a critical nutrient required for intracellular growth. In previous work, we showed that the host transcriptional response to the ΔmavN mutant appears similar to that of the wild-type strain, arguing that this dramatic growth arrest is not due to hyperstimulation of host innate immune factors (41) (dimB mutant). Therefore, we determined if increased intracellular stress or an inability to acquire a critical nutrient caused the defect exhibited by the absence of MavN.

Bacteria undergoing a stress response will transcriptionally activate regulons appropriate for alleviating that stress, whereas bacteria starved of an essential nutrient will increase production of proteins necessary for acquisition of that nutrient (42). To determine if the ΔmavN strain shows a hyperresponse diagnostic of either stress or starvation, transcriptional up-regulation of indicated transcripts was measured using total RNA harvested from infected macrophages at 3, 6, and 9 hpi, followed by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). The transcription of the global stress response gene gspA (43), which is induced during intracellular growth (44), was indistinguishable in the mutant and wild-type strains, with each showing ∼200-fold induction of gspA by 9 hpi (Fig. 3A). Similarly, we found no evidence for increased exposure of the mutant to reactive oxygen species based on equivalent transcriptional patterns of the superoxide dismutase sodC during residence of the wild-type and the mutant strains within host cells (Fig. 3A) (45). Finally, in response to the intracellular environment, both wild-type and ΔmavN mutant showed identical induction kinetics of dpsL, the gene for the Legionella paralog of the Dps protein that is involved in oxidative stress resistance (Fig. 3A) (46). Consequently, we found no evidence of enhanced expression of stress response-associated genes after challenge with the ΔmavN strain relative to wild-type Legionella.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

The ΔmavN mutant prematurely induces the expression of a subset of iron acquisition genes. Total RNA was harvested from RAW264.7 macrophages at 3, 6, and 9 hpi. qRT-PCR was performed to determine the relative transcription levels of selected genes in both the Lp02 (WT)- and ΔmavN-challenged monolayers. Non–iron-regulated (A) and iron-regulated (B) genes were examined. Relative transcript levels are normalized to Lp02 at 3 hpi (#). Significance, determined by Student’s t test, was as follows: lbtA, 3 hpi, Lp02 vs. ΔmavN (P < 0.01); lbtA, 6 h, Lp02 vs. ΔmavN (P < 0.005); frgA, 3 h, Lp02 vs. ΔmavN (P < 0.05); and frgA, 6 h, Lp02 vs. ΔmavN (P < 0.05).

The potential for starvation of a specific nutrient was next investigated. During conditions in which amino acids are limiting, Legionella growth is arrested and the bacteria transitions into a nonreplicative, transmissive phase that results in increased flagellin expression (47). When the flagellin fliC gene was analyzed, no significant differences were observed between the ΔmavN mutant and wild-type Legionella, indicating that the mutant is unlikely to be starved for amino acids (Fig. 3A).

Iron starvation as a consequence of the ΔmavN lesion was next investigated by monitoring the expression of lbtA, the first gene in the siderophore synthesis operon (26). By 3 hpi, there was ∼10-fold more lbtA transcript in the ΔmavN mutant compared with wild-type Lp02, although both strains expressed equivalent levels of transcript during growth in vitro before macrophage challenge (Fig. 3B and SI Appendix, Fig. S2A). Even at 6 hpi, when there was a clear increase in lbtA expression in Lp02, lbtA expression in the ΔmavN strain was still more than 10-fold higher. This hyperinduction of lbtA in the ΔmavN strain persisted at 9 hpi (Fig. 3B). A similar pattern of premature induction in the ΔmavN strain could be observed for the iron-regulated, putative siderophore synthase gene frgA (48) (Fig. 3B). Addition of a wild-type copy of the mavN gene to the ΔmavN mutant abolished the premature induction of both lbtA and frgA, indicating that the observed induction was due to the absence of mavN (Fig. 3B and SI Appendix, Fig. S2B). To determine if all known iron acquisition genes are prematurely induced, we monitored the expression of the ferrous iron transporter feoB and observed no differences in the pattern of expression between wild-type Legionella and the ΔmavN mutant during infection (Fig. 3B, panel 3). Thus, a subset of iron starvation-responsive genes was prematurely hyperinduced in the ΔmavN strain during infection. This indicates that the LCV established by the ΔmavN mutant is an iron-deficient vacuolar compartment.

The basis for the lack of response of feoB (part of the feoAB operon) was not clear. lbtA, frgA, and feoB all contain putative ferric uptake regulator (Fur)-binding elements (fur boxes) within their promoters ((25, 28, 48). Fur is a transcription factor that binds fur boxes and represses gene expression when cellular iron levels are high. Upon iron depletion, this repression is relieved and the expression of iron acquisition genes is induced (49). The feoAB fur box in L. pneumophila serotype Philadelphia-I contains five mismatches compared with the Escherichia coli consensus fur box sequence. To determine why this operon showed little regulation in the ΔmavN strain, we measured the feoB transcript levels of wild-type Legionella grown in broth culture containing the iron chelator deferoxamine (DFX). After an 8-h incubation in this iron-poor medium, there was a 12-fold induction of feoB compared with growth in unsupplemented AYE (SI Appendix, Fig. S2C). In contrast, frgA, which contains two overlapping fur boxes in its promoter, exhibited a robust 102-fold induction. The gene lpg2814 located immediately upstream of mavN showed no such induction (∼1.7-fold), consistent with the lack of a fur box within its promoter. Therefore, the lack of intracellular induction of feoB is a reflection of its lower sensitivity to iron starvation. Taken together, these results indicate that the ΔmavN mutant is iron-starved within the LCV.

MavN Is an Iron-Regulated Gene.

The transcriptional profile of the mavN gene was next analyzed to determine whether it is iron-regulated. The transcriptional start site of mavN, mapped using rapid amplification of 5′ complementary cDNA ends (5′ RACE), revealed that the ORF was incorrectly annotated in the published L. pneumophila Philadelphia-1 genome (50). Instead, we found that the start site initiated 42 base pairs downstream of the annotated site (Fig. 4A). A search for iron regulatory elements within this newly defined promoter region identified a putative fur box that aligns with the canonical E. coli fur box at 16 of 19 base pair positions (Fig. 4B). A similar fur box had been identified upstream of the mavN ortholog annotated in the L. pneumophila strain Paris isolate (34). Using this experimentally determined start site, mavN transcript levels were measured during growth in broth culture to determine if it was regulated by iron. Exponentially growing wild-type Legionella was grown in AYE, AYE supplemented with ferric nitrate (FN), or AYE containing the iron chelator DFX. After an 8-h incubation in iron-poor media, there was a ∼45-fold induction of mavN compared with growth in unsupplemented AYE (Fig. 4C). These results paralleled those observed for the iron-regulated genes frgA and lbtB (Fig. 4C).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

mavN is an iron-regulated gene. (A) Schematic of mavN locus, highlighting the location of the fur box (yellow shading) and the predicted (first nucleotide) and experimentally determined (gray shading) transcriptional start sites. (B) Alignment of the consensus E. coli fur box with the L. pneumophila mavN fur box. The mutations of the mavN fur box generated in this study are also shown. The position of the putative –35 box of mavN is marked. (C) Fur box mutation results in constitutive expression of mavN. Total RNA was harvested from bacteria grown in AYE, AYE supplemented with 334 μM FN (black bars), or AYE media treated with 7.5 μM DFX (white bars). Transcript levels are displayed relative to expression level in bacteria grown in untreated AYE. Data displayed are from two independent experiments.

The presence of a putative fur box within the mavN promoter is consistent with its expression being controlled by the iron-sensing transcription factor Fur. To test this hypothesis, mutations were generated in the mavN fur box, preserving the –35 region that was predicted by 5′ RACE mapping (mavN “fur mut”) (Fig. 4B), and mavN transcript levels were measured during growth in either iron-replete or -depleted broth. In iron-replete broth (normally repressing conditions), the mavN fur box mutation resulted in a 15-fold increase in transcript levels compared with the wild-type fur box (Fig. 4C). Growth in iron-depleted medium resulted in transcriptional induction of mavN in the wild-type strain, whereas the fur box mutant strain showed no further increase (Fig. 4C), indicating that fur box mutation caused constitutive expression, typical of an inability to bind Fur (5153). The behavior of the fur box mutant is consistent with MavN allowing access to host iron stores during intracellular growth as it is induced under iron-imiting conditions. The alternative model is that MavN is a regulatory element required for the expression of iron-regulated genes. To test this model, the transcription of frgA and lbtA was measured in Legionella strains possessing either a wild-type or mutant mavN fur box. As a further control, a fur box mutant was generated that was predicted to contain a defective –35 box (–35 mut), which would inhibit RNA polymerase-driven transcription of mavN (Fig. 4B). Accordingly, there was no mavN expression in the –35 mut, even under conditions of iron limitation (Fig. 4C). Consistent with an inability to transcribe mavN, the –35 fur box mutant phenocopied a ΔmavN mutant and was defective for intracellular growth in BMDMs (SI Appendix, Fig. S3). Transcription of frgA and lbtB was unaffected by any of the mavN fur box mutants during growth in broth culture, and both genes showed identical iron-responsiveness in all strains (Fig. 4C). Therefore, transcription of other putative Fur-regulated genes is independent of mavN expression during in vitro growth in broth culture. This result is in striking contrast to the behavior of these genes during intravacuolar growth (Fig. 3B), arguing that MavN plays a specific role during infection.

Defective Intracellular Growth of the mavN Mutant Is Rescued by Excess Iron.

Our data suggest that MavN is required for Legionella to obtain adequate iron across the membrane of the LCV. If this is correct, the requirement for MavN may be bypassed by increasing host iron levels during infection. To test this hypothesis, macrophages were challenged with either wild-type Legionella or the ΔmavN mutant, and at 2 hpi, the macrophage media was supplemented with varying amounts of either ferric ammonium citrate [Fe(III)-AC] or ferrous sulfate [Fe(II)SO4]. At 96 hpi, there were significant dose-dependent increases in intracellular replication of the ΔmavN mutant. Supplementation with 100 μM Fe(III)-AC or Fe(II)SO4 resulted in a 72-fold or 160-fold increase in bacterial growth of the ΔmavN, respectively, compared with growth in unsupplemented macrophage media (Fig. 5A). In contrast, intracellular growth of the wild-type Lp02 was unaffected by iron supplementation (Fig. 5A). This growth rescue was specific to iron supplementation because addition of zinc (ZnSO4), manganese (MnSO4), nickel (NiSO4), or copper (CuSO4) failed to increase the intracellular growth of the ΔmavN mutant. In fact, copper exacerbated the ΔmavN growth defect, with medium containing 100 μM CuSO4 causing a 12-fold decrease in intracellular growth of the mutant compared with the absence of metal supplementation (Fig. 5A, compare Lp02 to ΔmavN). As copper treatment has been linked to decreased intracellular iron stores, the ΔmavN-specific defect could be the result of copper aggravating the iron starvation experienced by the ΔmavN mutant (54).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Exogenous iron supplementation rescues the intracellular growth defect of the ΔmavN mutant. (A) Metal rescue is limited to iron. BMDMs were challenged with either Lp02 (WT) or the ΔmavN mutant. At 2 hpi, macrophage cultures were treated with 5, 50, or 100 μM of the indicated metal. At 96 hpi, macrophage lysates were plated for cfus. Each bar represents mean ± SEM of triplicate samples. *P < 0.0001, based on Student’s t test. (B) Iron rescue occurs throughout intracellular growth. BMDMs were pretreated with 0 or 100 μM ferric ammonium citrate for 24 h before challenge with bacteria. At indicated time points, macrophages were lysed and cfus were determined. (C) MavN is not required for in vitro growth in broth culture. Lp02 (WT) or the ΔmavN mutant were cultured in AYE or AYE containing indicated concentrations of DFX (5, 7.5, 10 μM). Mean ± SEM of three independent cultures is shown. (D) MavN is not required for in vitro growth on solid media. Lp02, the ΔmavN mutant, and the complemented ΔmavN+pmavN were grown to exponential phase in unsupplemented AYE broth, washed with PBS, and 10-fold serial dilutions were spotted onto AYE plates containing supplemental iron or the indicated concentration of DFX. Growth was monitored after a 4-d incubation at 37 °C.

The rate of intracellular growth was also analyzed in macrophages preloaded with 100 μM Fe(III)-AC for 24 h. The addition of iron had no effect on growth of either Lp02 or Lp03 (Fig. 5B). In contrast, the stimulation of ΔmavN growth by iron supplementation was obvious by 24 hpi, resulting in an ∼3-log increase in intracellular cfus by 72 hpi (Fig. 5B). Addition of exogenous iron to the macrophage media was accompanied by a concordant increase in host ferritin levels, a homeostatic response to maintain cytoplasmic iron levels (SI Appendix, Fig. S4A). The enhanced Legionella growth was not the result of bacterial growth in the macrophage medium because bacteria were unable to grow in this medium at any concentration of Fe(III)-AC addition (SI Appendix, Fig. S4B). Therefore, the increase in ΔmavN replication after iron supplementation represented increased growth within host macrophages.

To determine if MavN is required for growth under iron-limiting conditions in axenic cultures, we compared the growth of Lp02 and the ΔmavN mutant in broth containing increasing concentrations of the iron chelator DFX. Growth of the ΔmavN mutant was indistinguishable from that of wild-type Legionella when iron was limiting in liquid broth culture (Fig. 5C) or on solid media (Fig. 5D). In contrast to previous work that suggests MavN is involved in iron transport in bacteriological cultures (34), our data argue strongly against the hypothesis that MavN is involved in iron acquisition during extracellular growth. The fact that iron-regulated genes are induced in MavN-defective mutants during growth within macrophages, but not during growth in broth culture, indicates that the protein is only required for iron acquisition during intracellular growth.

Identification of a Putative MavN Iron-Binding Motif.

To elucidate the mechanism of action of MavN protein, we scanned the amino acid sequence for motifs that may be involved in directly binding iron (Fig. 6A). We first searched for EXXE motifs, which are required for iron transport activity in numerous fungal iron transporters and are found in ferritin and a Salmonella iron sensor (5558). Nine EXXE motifs were identified, and site-specific mutagenesis was performed to mutate each one to AXXE in the 3xFLAG-tagged MavN. Mutated mavN constructs were introduced into the ΔmavN mutant and their ability to complement the intracellular growth defect was investigated. One of the nine mutant constructs, pEXXE-3 (E439A), located in loop 7, failed to complement the ΔmavN mutant, indicating that it is critical for MavN activity (Fig. 6 B and C).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Identification of a putative mavN iron-binding region. (A) Schematic of the putative topology of MavN as determined by the topology prediction program TOPCONS (topcons.net). The His-rich loop is predicted to be in the lumen of the vacuole, based on accessibility of N-terminal FLAG tag to the antibody (Fig. 2D). EXXE motifs are numbered and shaded gray. The putative loop 7 is labeled with histidines shaded red. (B) Loop 7 mutations analyzed in this study. The sequence of the loop 7 region of MavN aligned with MavN mutations generated. (C) Selected loop 7 mutations disrupt intracellular growth. BMDMs were challenged (MOI, 0.05) with a ΔmavN/lux+ harboring indicated pJB908-derived plasmids. Intracellular replication was monitored by luciferase activity. Growth is reported as relative luminescence units (RLUs). Data represent triplicate macrophage cultures and displayed as the mean ± SEM.

Loop 7, which contains the critical glutamine residue of EXXE-3, is highly enriched in histidine residues (Fig. 6 A and B). His-rich sequences can be found in diverse families of metal transporters (59). Additionally, histidines tend to be enriched in binding sites for iron (60). We generated three mutant constructions—a 3-His (H445A, H450A, H452A), a 4-His (H460A, H462A, H465A, H466A), and a composite 7-His mutant—by site-specific mutagenesis (Fig. 6B). Complementation of the ΔmavN mutant replication defect was only observed with the 4-His mutant construction, indicating that one or all of the first three histidines within that region are essential for MavN function (Fig. 6C). The lack of complementation is not due to a failure to produce these protein derivatives because there were equivalent steady-state levels of each one (SI Appendix, Fig. S5A). The lack of complementation is also not due to mislocalization of these mutant proteins, as they are translocated and localized to the LCV membrane similarly to wild-type MavN (SI Appendix, Fig. S5B). Given the identification of essential amino acids in loop 7, we created two additional mutant constructs that alter regions rich in Glu and Asp residues in this loop, as acidic side chains are often involved in metal binding (60) (Fig. 6B, EXXE-4b and EXXE-5b). Both of these mutants complemented the ΔmavN strain for intracellular growth, indicating that these residues are not essential for the function of MavN (Fig. 6C). Thus, a single E439A mutant and the 3-His (H445, H450A, H452A) mutant caused unique defects in intracellular growth. Taken together, these data could indicate that residues thought to be associated with iron binding and transport are required for MavN function.

Discussion

The LCV is sequestered from host endocytic compartments (61, 62). As a consequence, it is likely that there is limited contact of Legionella with the vesicular traffic of iron-containing proteins, requiring an alternative iron acquisition strategy to allow bacterial growth (24). This work proposes that the Legionella protein MavN is the central bacterial player in driving this strategy. Our data support the model that, after establishing the LCV, the bacterium experiences iron limitation, resulting in enhanced expression of mavN, which encodes an Icm/Dot translocated transmembrane protein that localizes to the host-derived vacuolar membrane. Given that the growth defect of mavN mutants is partially bypassed by flooding cells with iron and that the absence of the protein results in premature iron starvation, it is likely that MavN is a vacuolar iron transporter.

Previous studies have identified two Legionella iron acquisition systems that play a role in bacteriological culture but have variable requirements for intracellular replication. The absence of feoB results in a 10-fold growth defect in the human U937 macrophage-like cell line, although it has no discernible effect on growth within the amoeba Hartmanella vermiformis (25). Mutants disrupted in genes involved in synthesis, export, and import of the Legionella siderophore legiobactin, on the other hand, have no complementable growth defects in any cell type tested (26, 28, 29). In contrast, our data indicate that there is no requirement for MavN during growth in any bacteriological culture condition tested, despite the stringent intracellular growth requirement for this protein. This conclusion conflicts with recent work that posits a role for MavN during growth in iron-limiting bacteriological cultures in the Legionella strains 130b and Paris (34). An explanation for these conflicting results could be that the function of MavN differs among different Legionella strains. Alternatively, in some strain backgrounds, MavN could function to facilitate iron transport across both prokaryotic and eukaryotic membranes. Finally, the mavN mutants described previously may harbor other genetic perturbations that affect growth in culture. Consistent with this explanation, the intracellular growth defect associated with these strains is not fully complemented by a wild-type copy of mavN (34).

Several lines of evidence support a specific role for MavN in facilitating intracellular iron acquisition. First, within host cells, Legionella ΔmavN mutants showed premature transcriptional activation of iron starvation-associated genes. Premature induction occurs as early as 3 hpi, including genes involved in siderophore biosynthesis, which are transcribed 10-fold higher than in wild-type cells at this time point. Second, we could partially rescue the intracellular growth defect of the ΔmavN mutant by supplementing the macrophage culture medium with exogenous iron. Iron supplementation resulted in a clear increase in intracellular iron stores within the host cell, with consequent up-regulation of cytoplasmic ferritin. The mechanism by which exogenous iron supplementation bypasses the requirement for MavN is unknown, although a similar phenomenon has been previously observed during Candida glabrata infection (63). It is possible that this bypass could result from aberrant interactions between the LCV and ferritin/iron-containing endosomes as the host cells try to maintain homeostatic levels of iron during ferric ammonium citrate-induced iron overload (64, 65). Rescue was specific to supplementation with iron, as manganese, copper, zinc, and nickel failed to reverse the growth arrest of the ΔmavN mutant. Third, environmental iron levels transcriptionally regulated mavN expression, controlled by a promoter that we demonstrated contains a functional iron-responsive fur box. Fur is a divalent metal ion-binding protein that recognizes a 19-bp fur box in response to abundant iron. As the fur box often overlaps with the –10 and –35 promoter elements, Fur binding occludes RNA polymerase binding to block transcription. A Legionella Fur homolog has been identified (66), and the promoters of feoAB, lbtABC, and lbtU contain putative fur boxes. A fur box participates in the iron regulation of mavN because mutation of this promoter element resulted in constitutive, iron concentration-independent expression of mavN.

For Legionella growing in vitro, ferrous iron can be directly imported through the feoB inner membrane transporter, whereas siderophores can be used to scavenge ferric iron, importing it through inner and outer membrane transporters (25, 26, 28, 29). The bacterium also secretes HGA-melanin, which has a ferric reductase activity that could allow ferrous iron to be assimilated via the feoB transporter (67). Within host cells, the majority of iron is present either as ferric iron tightly bound to host glycoproteins that prevent easy access or is sequestered in the cytosol within the LIP. Vacuolar pathogens that interact with endosomes are able to scavenge iron from the host glycoproteins within these compartments and may not require specialized vacuolar transporters to acquire iron. Mycobacterium tuberculosis secretes siderophores that acquire iron from transferrin after fusion of endosomes with the replication compartment (18, 20, 68), and siderophore mutants are severely attenuated for growth in macrophages (69). Salmonella spp., which reside in an acidic compartment, similarly uses multiple siderophores to acquire iron intracellularly, possibly from transferrin as well (21). Leishmania parasites, which reside in a phagolysosome-like vacuole, express a membrane-bound ferric reductase LFR1, which generates ferrous iron that can be taken up by the LIT1 ferrous iron transporter, which is also present in the parasite membrane (22, 23). The absence of direct interaction of the LCV with transferrin receptor-rich endosomes (24) raises a problem for Legionella during intracellular growth that we propose is solved by the Icm/Dot substrate MavN. The unique incidence of this protein within Legionella species and R. grylii supports this line of reasoning. Coxiella burnetii is a close evolutionary relative of Legionella and also possesses an Icm/Dot translocation system. Coxiella, however, does not have a homolog of MavN, which we propose is not needed because the bacterium resides in a vacuole that fuses with lysosomes, allowing access to the transferrin iron uptake pathway (70). Thus, MavN appears to be the key bacterial protein that allows the bacterium access to host iron, and its position on the vacuolar membrane could facilitate access to the cytosolic LIP.

MavN integrates into the host vacuolar membrane during infection, and our ability to detect an N-terminal FLAG epitope tag on the surface of intact, isolated LCVs indicates that the N terminus of this transmembrane protein is exposed to the cytoplasm during infection. Further experimental analysis is required to determine the exact topology of this unique protein, although hydropathy plots offer predictive models (Fig. 6A) (38). The hydrophobic nature of MavN argues that additional bacterial or host factors may chaperone its translocation and integration into the LCV membrane. A bioinformatic analysis of predicted hydrophobic regions in IDTSs identified 71 putative transmembrane proteins, including a Legionella Icm/Dot substrate shown to integrate into the inner mitochondrial membrane (71). The abundance of such hydrophobic bacterial factors indicates that Legionella must have mechanisms for integrating bacterial proteins such as MavN into host cell membranes.

We favor a model in which MavN acts as an iron transporter. Transmembrane loop 7 is of particular interest in this regard. The loop contains a 22-residue region, starting at His445, that contains seven histidine residues. Simultaneously mutating His445, His450, and His452 to alanine abrogates the function of MavN without altering steady-state levels or localization of the protein, indicating that these residues are required for MavN activity. His-rich motifs have been identified in numerous metal ion transporters and are present in the cytoplasmic loops of the functionally characterized metal transporters Zrt1 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and Irt1 (Arabidopsis thaliana) (72). Although the function of His-rich regions in these proteins is not yet known, they have been implicated in metal binding (59). Consistent with the hypothesis that MavN is an iron transporter, loop 7 could define an iron-binding domain. As our current topological prediction places loop 7 within the lumen of the LCV, we predict that these critical residues may facilitate iron traffic through the membrane or coordinate with iron transport systems on the bacterial membrane. Similar localization of a histidine-rich motif on the face of the membrane opposite the source of the metal is quite common in metal transporters of the ZIP (Zrt- and Irt-like Proteins) and CDF (Cation Diffusion Family) families (72). It has been postulated that the histidines within this motif in the human zinc tranporter hZip1 may coordinate with residues within the transmembrane domain to mediate zinc during transport (73). In addition, it is worth noting that topological prediction programs differ in the number of transmembrane domains predicted for MavN, so experimental validation of the displayed orientation is required. It is also possible that MavN may mediate vacuolar iron acquisition by another mechanism, such as recruiting and facilitating interactions with host or bacterial factors that transport iron into the LCV. Analysis of the interaction of purified derivatives of MavN and host proteins involved in cellular iron homeostasis should contribute significantly to understanding the molecular basis of iron acquisition across the replication vacuole membrane.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains, Cell Culture, and Growth Media.

E. coli strains were cultured as described (74). L. pneumophila strain Philadelphia-1, Lp02 (thyA+), served as the parental wild-type strain, and all Lp02 derivatives were cultured as described, except where noted (74). Details of the cloning strategy and strain construction used are described in SI Appendix, SI Materials and Methods.

D. discoideum strain Ax4 was cultured as described (75), as were primary BMDMs (3). U937 cells (ATCC CRL-1593.2) were maintained and differentiated as described previously (76). The RAW264.7 macrophage-like cell line (ATCC TIB-71) was obtained from the ATCC and was cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (Gibco) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) heat-inactivated FBS (Gibco), 1,000 U/mL penicillin (Gibco), and 1,000 U/mL streptomycin (Gibco).

Growth Assays.

Details of Legionella growth in either liquid culture (measuring optical density at 600 nm) or on solid media (monitoring colony formation) are provided in SI Appendix, SI Materials and Methods. Quantitative and microscopic intracellular growth assays, in the presence and absence of transition metals, were performed as described previously (74), with modifications detailed in SI Appendix, SI Materials and Methods. Fluorescence microscopy was performed as previously described (32).

Translocation Assays.

Icm/Dot-dependent translocation of MavN into differentiated U937 macrophages was assessed by immunofluorescence in intact cells and isolated vacuoles from postnuclear supernatants as described previously (30, 77).

Transcriptional Analyses.

To analyze transcription during broth growth, overnight cultures of indicated strains were grown to exponential phase in liquid AYE. Bacterial cells were pelleted, resuspended in fresh AYE, and subcultured into either AYE, AYE + 334 μM FN, or AYE + 7.5 μM DFX. Cultures were then incubated at 37 °C on a rotating platform. After an 8-h incubation, 1 mL of each culture was harvested, RNA Protect Bacteria Reagent (Qiagen) was added, and total RNA was harvested using RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) and treated with Turbo DNase (Ambion). qRT-PCR samples were prepared using the Power SYBR RNA-to-CT 1-Step (Applied Biosystems), and the reaction was analyzed in an Applied Biosystems Step One-Plus. Results were analyzed using the Step One Software, v2.2. Relative expression, ΔΔCt analysis, was performed using 16S rRNA as a reference transcript.

Transcription during intracellular growth was analyzed in RAW264.7 macrophage-like cells. The RAW264.7 cells were seeded in DMEM + 10% FBS (no antibiotics) and challenged with indicated Legionella strains at an MOI (multiplicity of infection) of 1–1.5 in two 10-cm Petri dishes. Plates were centrifuged at 200 × g for 5 min and incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 2 h. Medium was removed and replaced with medium containing 50 μg/mL gentamicin for 1 h to kill extracellular bacteria. Macrophage monolayers were then washed three times with DMEM alone, before being incubated in DMEM + 10% FBS (no antibiotics). At indicated time points, macrophages were lysed with TRIzol Reagent (Ambion) and RNA was prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, culture supernatants were decanted, and 4 mL TRIzol Reagent was quickly added before cell lysis with vigorous pipetting. Lysates from two plates were combined, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80 °C until RNA harvesting. The lysates were thawed at 37 °C, incubated at 95 °C for 10–15 min, and incubated on ice for 5 min. We added 1.6 mL chloroform to the lysate and shook it vigorously. After incubation of 2–3 min at room temperature, the samples were transferred to a prespun 15 mL phase lock tube (5-Prime) and centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 4 min at 4 °C. The aqueous phase was collected, and 4 mL isopropanol was added to precipitate the RNA. After 10 min of incubation at room temperature, the sample was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The pellet was washed with 70% ethanol, allowed to air dry, resuspended in 200 μL ultrapure water (Invitrogen), and RNA was purified using the RNeasy Midi (Qiagen), removing contaminating DNA with Turbo DNA-free (Ambion). qRT-PCR analysis was performed as described for bacteria grown in bacteriological culture.

The transcriptional start sites were determined using the 5′ RACE System for Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends, version 2.0 (Invitrogen). The products of the nested PCR were sequenced to determine the transcriptional start site (Genewiz).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File
pnas.1511389112.sapp.pdf (747.6KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dennise DeJesus and Sarah Jung for help with plasmid and strain construction. We thank Seblewongel Asrat, Won Young Choi, Kim Davis, Dennise DeJesus, Edward Geisenger, Andrew Hempstead, and Vinay Ramabhadran for critical review of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and by NIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Training Grants T32 AI007329 (to D.T.I.) and 5 T32 AI07422 (to R.K.L.) and by a postdoctoral fellowship from NIH (to N.V.). R.R.I. is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1511389112/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Barbaree JM, Fields BS, Feeley JC, Gorman GW, Martin WT. Isolation of protozoa from water associated with a legionellosis outbreak and demonstration of intracellular multiplication of Legionella pneumophila. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986;51(2):422–424. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.2.422-424.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nash TW, Libby DM, Horwitz MA. Interaction between the legionnaires’ disease bacterium (Legionella pneumophila) and human alveolar macrophages. Influence of antibody, lymphokines, and hydrocortisone. J Clin Invest. 1984;74(3):771–782. doi: 10.1172/JCI111493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Swanson MS, Isberg RR. Association of Legionella pneumophila with the macrophage endoplasmic reticulum. Infect Immun. 1995;63(9):3609–3620. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.9.3609-3620.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Marra A, Blander SJ, Horwitz MA, Shuman HA. Identification of a Legionella pneumophila locus required for intracellular multiplication in human macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89(20):9607–9611. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Berger KH, Isberg RR. Two distinct defects in intracellular growth complemented by a single genetic locus in Legionella pneumophila. Mol Microbiol. 1993;7(1):7–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01092.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Berger KH, Merriam JJ, Isberg RR. Altered intracellular targeting properties associated with mutations in the Legionella pneumophila dotA gene. Mol Microbiol. 1994;14(4):809–822. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb01317.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xu L, Luo ZQ. Cell biology of infection by Legionella pneumophila. Microbes Infect. 2013;15(2):157–167. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2012.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhu W, et al. Comprehensive identification of protein substrates of the Dot/Icm type IV transporter of Legionella pneumophila. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e17638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tilney LG, Harb OS, Connelly PS, Robinson CG, Roy CR. How the parasitic bacterium Legionella pneumophila modifies its phagosome and transforms it into rough ER: Implications for conversion of plasma membrane to the ER membrane. J Cell Sci. 2001;114(Pt 24):4637–4650. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.24.4637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Horwitz MA. Formation of a novel phagosome by the Legionnaires’ disease bacterium (Legionella pneumophila) in human monocytes. J Exp Med. 1983;158(4):1319–1331. doi: 10.1084/jem.158.4.1319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Isaac DT, Isberg R. Master manipulators: An update on Legionella pneumophila Icm/Dot translocated substrates and their host targets. Future Microbiol. 2014;9(3):343–359. doi: 10.2217/fmb.13.162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Asrat S, de Jesús DA, Hempstead AD, Ramabhadran V, Isberg RR. Bacterial pathogen manipulation of host membrane trafficking. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:79–109. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Luo ZQ, Isberg RR. Multiple substrates of the Legionella pneumophila Dot/Icm system identified by interbacterial protein transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(3):841–846. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0304916101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hood MI, Skaar EP. Nutritional immunity: Transition metals at the pathogen-host interface. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10(8):525–537. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Philpott CC, Ryu MS. Special delivery: Distributing iron in the cytosol of mammalian cells. Front Pharmacol. 2014;5:173. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.van Renswoude J, Bridges KR, Harford JB, Klausner RD. Receptor-mediated endocytosis of transferrin and the uptake of fe in K562 cells: Identification of a nonlysosomal acidic compartment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79(20):6186–6190. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.20.6186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yamashiro DJ, Tycko B, Fluss SR, Maxfield FR. Segregation of transferrin to a mildly acidic (pH 6.5) para-Golgi compartment in the recycling pathway. Cell. 1984;37(3):789–800. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90414-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Olakanmi O, Schlesinger LS, Ahmed A, Britigan BE. Intraphagosomal Mycobacterium tuberculosis acquires iron from both extracellular transferrin and intracellular iron pools. Impact of interferon-gamma and hemochromatosis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(51):49727–49734. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209768200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Clemens DL, Horwitz MA. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis phagosome interacts with early endosomes and is accessible to exogenously administered transferrin. J Exp Med. 1996;184(4):1349–1355. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.4.1349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gobin J, Horwitz MA. Exochelins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis remove iron from human iron-binding proteins and donate iron to mycobactins in the M. tuberculosis cell wall. J Exp Med. 1996;183(4):1527–1532. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.4.1527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nagy TA, Moreland SM, Andrews-Polymenis H, Detweiler CS. The ferric enterobactin transporter Fep is required for persistent Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium infection. Infect Immun. 2013;81(11):4063–4070. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00412-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Huynh C, Sacks DL, Andrews NW. A Leishmania amazonensis ZIP family iron transporter is essential for parasite replication within macrophage phagolysosomes. J Exp Med. 2006;203(10):2363–2375. doi: 10.1084/jem.20060559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Flannery AR, Huynh C, Mittra B, Mortara RA, Andrews NW. LFR1 ferric iron reductase of Leishmania amazonensis is essential for the generation of infective parasite forms. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(26):23266–23279. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.229674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Joshi AD, Sturgill-Koszycki S, Swanson MS. Evidence that Dot-dependent and -independent factors isolate the Legionella pneumophila phagosome from the endocytic network in mouse macrophages. Cell Microbiol. 2001;3(2):99–114. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2001.00093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Robey M, Cianciotto NP. Legionella pneumophila feoAB promotes ferrous iron uptake and intracellular infection. Infect Immun. 2002;70(10):5659–5669. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.10.5659-5669.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Allard KA, Viswanathan VK, Cianciotto NP. lbtA and lbtB are required for production of the Legionella pneumophila siderophore legiobactin. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(4):1351–1363. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.4.1351-1363.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Allard KA, et al. Purification of Legiobactin and importance of this siderophore in lung infection by Legionella pneumophila. Infect Immun. 2009;77(7):2887–2895. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00087-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chatfield CH, Mulhern BJ, Viswanathan VK, Cianciotto NP. The major facilitator superfamily-type protein LbtC promotes the utilization of the legiobactin siderophore by Legionella pneumophila. Microbiology. 2012;158(Pt 3):721–735. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.055533-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chatfield CH, Mulhern BJ, Burnside DM, Cianciotto NP. Legionella pneumophila LbtU acts as a novel, TonB-independent receptor for the legiobactin siderophore. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(7):1563–1575. doi: 10.1128/JB.01111-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Laguna RK, Creasey EA, Li Z, Valtz N, Isberg RR. A Legionella pneumophila-translocated substrate that is required for growth within macrophages and protection from host cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(49):18745–18750. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609012103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Isberg RR, O’Connor TJ, Heidtman M. The Legionella pneumophila replication vacuole: Making a cosy niche inside host cells. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(1):13–24. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Creasey EA, Isberg RR. The protein SdhA maintains the integrity of the Legionella-containing vacuole. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(9):3481–3486. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121286109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ge J, Gong YN, Xu Y, Shao F. Preventing bacterial DNA release and absent in melanoma 2 inflammasome activation by a Legionella effector functioning in membrane trafficking. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(16):6193–6198. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117490109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Portier E, et al. IroT/mavN, a new iron-regulated gene involved in Legionella pneumophila virulence against amoebae and macrophages. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17(4):1338–1350. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Derré I, Isberg RR. Legionella pneumophila replication vacuole formation involves rapid recruitment of proteins of the early secretory system. Infect Immun. 2004;72(5):3048–3053. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.5.3048-3053.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Roux V, Bergoin M, Lamaze N, Raoult D. Reassessment of the taxonomic position of Rickettsiella grylli. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47(4):1255–1257. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-4-1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bernsel A, Viklund H, Hennerdal A, Elofsson A. TOPCONS: Consensus prediction of membrane protein topology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Web Server issue):W465–W468. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nagai H, et al. A C-terminal translocation signal required for Dot/Icm-dependent delivery of the Legionella RalF protein to host cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(3):826–831. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406239101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Huang L, et al. The E Block motif is associated with Legionella pneumophila translocated substrates. Cell Microbiol. 2011;13(2):227–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01531.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Losick VP, Isberg RR. NF-kappaB translocation prevents host cell death after low-dose challenge by Legionella pneumophila. J Exp Med. 2006;203(9):2177–2189. doi: 10.1084/jem.20060766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Harder W, Dijkhuizen L. Physiological responses to nutrient limitation. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1983;37:1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.37.100183.000245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Abu Kwaik Y, Engleberg NC. Cloning and molecular characterization of a Legionella pneumophila gene induced by intracellular infection and by various in vitro stress conditions. Mol Microbiol. 1994;13(2):243–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00419.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Abu Kwaik Y, Gao LY, Harb OS, Stone BJ. Transcriptional regulation of the macrophage-induced gene (gspA) of Legionella pneumophila and phenotypic characterization of a null mutant. Mol Microbiol. 1997;24(3):629–642. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.3661739.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Harada T, Miyake M, Imai Y. Evasion of Legionella pneumophila from the bactericidal system by reactive oxygen species (ROS) in macrophages. Microbiol Immunol. 2007;51(12):1161–1170. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2007.tb04011.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yu MJ, Ren J, Zeng YL, Zhou SN, Lu YJ. The Legionella pneumophila Dps homolog is regulated by iron and involved in multiple stress tolerance. J Basic Microbiol. 2009;49(Suppl 1):S79–S86. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200800357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Molofsky AB, Swanson MS. Differentiate to thrive: Lessons from the Legionella pneumophila life cycle. Mol Microbiol. 2004;53(1):29–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04129.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hickey EK, Cianciotto NP. An iron- and fur-repressed Legionella pneumophila gene that promotes intracellular infection and encodes a protein with similarity to the Escherichia coli aerobactin synthetases. Infect Immun. 1997;65(1):133–143. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.1.133-143.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Troxell B, Hassan HM. Transcriptional regulation by Ferric Uptake Regulator (Fur) in pathogenic bacteria. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013;3:59. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chien M, et al. The genomic sequence of the accidental pathogen Legionella pneumophila. Science. 2004;305(5692):1966–1968. doi: 10.1126/science.1099776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ernst JF, Bennett RL, Rothfield LI. Constitutive expression of the iron-enterochelin and ferrichrome uptake systems in a mutant strain of Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 1978;135(3):928–934. doi: 10.1128/jb.135.3.928-934.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hantke K. Regulation of ferric iron transport in Escherichia coli K12: Isolation of a constitutive mutant. Mol Gen Genet. 1981;182(2):288–292. doi: 10.1007/BF00269672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bagg A, Neilands JB. Mapping of a mutation affecting regulation of iron uptake systems in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1985;161(1):450–453. doi: 10.1128/jb.161.1.450-453.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chung J, Haile DJ, Wessling-Resnick M. Copper-induced ferroportin-1 expression in J774 macrophages is associated with increased iron efflux. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(9):2700–2705. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0306622101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Stearman R, Yuan DS, Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, Klausner RD, Dancis A. A permease-oxidase complex involved in high-affinity iron uptake in yeast. Science. 1996;271(5255):1552–1557. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5255.1552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ramanan N, Wang Y. A high-affinity iron permease essential for Candida albicans virulence. Science. 2000;288(5468):1062–1064. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5468.1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Trikha J, Theil EC, Allewell NM. High resolution crystal structures of amphibian red-cell L ferritin: Potential roles for structural plasticity and solvation in function. J Mol Biol. 1995;248(5):949–967. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wösten MM, Kox LF, Chamnongpol S, Soncini FC, Groisman EA. A signal transduction system that responds to extracellular iron. Cell. 2000;103(1):113–125. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00092-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Grossoehme NE, Akilesh S, Guerinot ML, Wilcox DE. Metal-binding thermodynamics of the histidine-rich sequence from the metal-transport protein IRT1 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Inorg Chem. 2006;45(21):8500–8508. doi: 10.1021/ic0606431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lu CH, Lin YF, Lin JJ, Yu CS. Prediction of metal ion-binding sites in proteins using the fragment transformation method. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Horwitz MA. The Legionnaires’ disease bacterium (Legionella pneumophila) inhibits phagosome-lysosome fusion in human monocytes. J Exp Med. 1983;158(6):2108–2126. doi: 10.1084/jem.158.6.2108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Roy CR, Berger KH, Isberg RR. Legionella pneumophila DotA protein is required for early phagosome trafficking decisions that occur within minutes of bacterial uptake. Mol Microbiol. 1998;28(3):663–674. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00841.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nevitt T, Thiele DJ. Host iron withholding demands siderophore utilization for Candida glabrata to survive macrophage killing. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(3):e1001322. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Asano T, et al. Distinct mechanisms of ferritin delivery to lysosomes in iron-depleted and iron-replete cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31(10):2040–2052. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01437-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kurz T, Eaton JW, Brunk UT. The role of lysosomes in iron metabolism and recycling. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2011;43(12):1686–1697. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2011.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hickey EK, Cianciotto NP. Cloning and sequencing of the Legionella pneumophila fur gene. Gene. 1994;143(1):117–121. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90615-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zheng H, Chatfield CH, Liles MR, Cianciotto NP. Secreted pyomelanin of Legionella pneumophila promotes bacterial iron uptake and growth under iron-limiting conditions. Infect Immun. 2013;81(11):4182–4191. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00858-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wagner D, et al. Elemental analysis of Mycobacterium avium-, Mycobacterium tuberculosis-, and Mycobacterium smegmatis-containing phagosomes indicates pathogen-induced microenvironments within the host cell’s endosomal system. J Immunol. 2005;174(3):1491–1500. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.3.1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.De Voss JJ, et al. The salicylate-derived mycobactin siderophores of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are essential for growth in macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(3):1252–1257. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.3.1252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Segal G, Feldman M, Zusman T. The Icm/Dot type-IV secretion systems of Legionella pneumophila and Coxiella burnetii. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005;29(1):65–81. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Dolezal P, et al. Legionella pneumophila secretes a mitochondrial carrier protein during infection. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(1):e1002459. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Gaither LA, Eide DJ. Eukaryotic zinc transporters and their regulation. Biometals. 2001;14(3-4):251–270. doi: 10.1023/a:1012988914300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Milon B, Wu Q, Zou J, Costello LC, Franklin RB. Histidine residues in the region between transmembrane domains III and IV of hZip1 are required for zinc transport across the plasma membrane in PC-3 cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1758(10):1696–1701. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.O’Connor TJ, Boyd D, Dorer MS, Isberg RR. Aggravating genetic interactions allow a solution to redundancy in a bacterial pathogen. Science. 2012;338(6113):1440–1444. doi: 10.1126/science.1229556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Solomon JM, Rupper A, Cardelli JA, Isberg RR. Intracellular growth of Legionella pneumophila in Dictyostelium discoideum, a system for genetic analysis of host-pathogen interactions. Infect Immun. 2000;68(5):2939–2947. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.5.2939-2947.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ensminger AW, Isberg RR. E3 ubiquitin ligase activity and targeting of BAT3 by multiple Legionella pneumophila translocated substrates. Infect Immun. 2010;78(9):3905–3919. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00344-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Derré I, Isberg RR. LidA, a translocated substrate of the Legionella pneumophila type IV secretion system, interferes with the early secretory pathway. Infect Immun. 2005;73(7):4370–4380. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.7.4370-4380.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File
pnas.1511389112.sapp.pdf (747.6KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES