Skip to main content
Annals of Botany logoLink to Annals of Botany
. 2014 Dec 22;116(4):613–625. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu246

Zinc induces distinct changes in the metabolism of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS and RNS) in the roots of two Brassica species with different sensitivity to zinc stress

Gábor Feigl 1,*, Nóra Lehotai 1, Árpád Molnár 1, Attila Ördög 1, Marta Rodríguez-Ruiz 2, José M Palma 2, Francisco J Corpas 2, László Erdei 1, Zsuzsanna Kolbert 1
PMCID: PMC4577986  PMID: 25538112

Abstract

Background and Aims Zinc (Zn) is an essential micronutrient naturally present in soils, but anthropogenic activities can lead to accumulation in the environment and resulting damage to plants. Heavy metals such as Zn can induce oxidative stress and the generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS and RNS), which can reduce growth and yield in crop plants. This study assesses the interplay of these two families of molecules in order to evaluate the responses in roots of two Brassica species under high concentrations of Zn.

Methods Nine-day-old hydroponically grown Brassica juncea (Indian mustard) and B. napus (oilseed rape) seedlings were treated with ZnSO4 (0, 50, 150 and 300 µm) for 7 d. Stress intensity was assessed through analyses of cell wall damage and cell viability. Biochemical and cellular techniques were used to measure key components of the metabolism of ROS and RNS including lipid peroxidation, enzymatic antioxidants, protein nitration and content of superoxide radical (O2·), nitric oxide (NO) and peroxynitrite (ONOO).

Key Results Analysis of morphological root damage and alterations of microelement homeostasis indicate that B. juncea is more tolerant to Zn stress than B. napus. ROS and RNS parameters suggest that the oxidative components are predominant compared with the nitrosative components in the root system of both species.

Conclusions The results indicate a clear relationship between ROS and RNS metabolism as a mechanism of response against stress caused by an excess of Zn. The oxidative stress components seem to be more dominant than the elements of the nitrosative stress in the root system of these two Brassica species.

Keywords: Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, Indian mustard, oilseed rape, excess zinc, reactive oxygen species, ROS, oxidative stress, reactive nitrogen species, RNS, nitrosative stress, protein nitration

INTRODUCTION

 Heavy metal contamination is an increasingly serious problem for the environment and for agriculture. According to the World Health Organization, 31 % of the world’s population is potentially at risk of zinc (Zn) deficiency (World Health Organization, 2005); however, at the same time, Zn contamination also appears to be a increasing problem over recent decades (Zarcinas et al., 2004). The most important sources of Zn pollution in the environment are mostly anthropogenic, such as mining, waste disposal, electroplating or smelting (Bacon and Dinev, 2005; Bi et al., 2006). Being an essential micronutrient, Zn plays an important role as a cofactor in numerous enzymatic reactions involved in protein synthesis and in carbohydrate, nucleic acid and lipid metabolism (Broadley et al., 2007). On the other hand, Zn excess may have a negative effect on plants. Among others, seed germination and plant growth inhibition (Mrozek and Funicelli, 1982; Wang et al., 2009), changes in root development (Lingua et al., 2008), loss of membrane integrity (Stoyanova and Doncheva, 2002) or cell death (Chang et al. 2005) have been determined to be effects of Zn exposure. The mechanisms behind Zn toxicity are not completely understood; competition for catalytic sites or transporters (González-Guerrero et al., 2005), evidence for Zn-induced micronutrient deficiency (Bonnet et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2009) or induction of oxidative stress (Wintz et al., 2003) has been provided.

Non-redox active heavy metals such as Zn can cause oxidative stress by blocking essential functional groups in biomolecules because of their ability to bind strongly to oxygen, nitrogen or sulphur atoms, thereby inactivating enzymes by binding to their cysteine residues (Nieboer and Richardson, 1980), or by replacing other essential metal ions in their catalytic sites (Schützendübel and Polle, 2002). During oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide anion (O2·), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hydroxyl radicals (·OH), are commonly generated. High levels of ROS are able to damage macromolecules; thus ROS concentrations need to be strictly controlled by complex mechanisms in plants (Apel and Hirt, 2004). These include several enzymes such as ascorbate peroxidase (APX; EC 1.11.1.11), glutathione reductase (GR; EC 1.6.4.2), catalase (CAT; EC 1.11.1.6) and superoxide dismutase (SOD; EC 1.1.5.1.1), and non-enzymatic, soluble antioxidants such as glutathione and ascorbate, among others.

In addition to ROS, the term reactive nitrogen species (RNS) is used extensively to describe the family of nitric oxide (NO)-related molecules, such as peroxynitrite (ONOO), dinitrogen trioxide (N2O3), dinitrogen tetraoxide (N2O4), S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), nitrogen dioxide radical (NO2·), nitrosonium cation (NO+) and nitroxyl anion (NO) (Wang et al., 2013). Nitrosative stress, another stress process caused by environmental factors, evolves as the consequence of RNS accumulation in plant cells (Corpas et al., 2007, 2011). However, the two families of reactive molecules (ROS and RNS) are involved in overlapping signalling processes; indeed, the existence of nitro-oxidative stress has been reported to occur under certain circumstances (Corpas and Barroso, 2013). An excellent example of ROS–RNS cross-talk is the reaction between O2· and NO yielding ONOO, which is responsible for the protein tyrosine nitration which is becoming a useful biomarker of nitrosative stress in plants (Corpas et al., 2007, 2013). Protein tyrosine nitration is a post-translational modification resulting in the addition of a nitro group (–NO2) to one of the two equivalent ortho carbons in the aromatic ring of tyrosine residues (Gow et al., 2004). It causes steric and electronic perturbations, which modify the capability of tyrosine to function in electron transfer reactions or to maintain the proper protein conformation (van der Vliet et al., 1999). Tyrosine nitration can affect the function of a protein in numerous ways: in addition to no effect on functions or a gain function, the most common result of tyrosine nitration is the inhibition of the protein’s function (Greenacre and Ischiropoulos, 2001; Radi, 2004). Furthermore, tyrosine nitration has the ability to influence several signal transduction pathways through the prevention of tyrosine phosphorylation (Galetskiy et al., 2011).

In most plants, the vacuoles of the root cells serve as the most important site of Zn storage, thus removing the metal from the root–shoot–leaf transport system and playing a crucial role in basal Zn tolerance (Arrivault et al., 2006). Further protection mechanisms, such as alterations of the cell wall, e.g. callose deposition, facilitate the survival of the plants by limiting the uptake and translocation of heavy metals and by preventing the leakage of assimilates and other nutrients (Sjölund, 1997; Chen and Kim, 2009). During callose deposition, the properties of the cell wall are modified by adding extra layers of carbohydrates synthesized by callose synthase, a transmembrane protein in the outer plasma membrane (Kartusch, 2003).

Since heavy metals such as Zn result in a massive reduction in crop yield worldwide, the goal of this study was to investigate the morphological and physiological responses of two important crop plants, Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) and oilseed rape (Brassica napus), to Zn excess. Furthermore, our aim was to determine the potential involvement of ROS and RNS in the Zn sensitivity of Brassica species.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant material and growing conditions

Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. and Brassica napus L. seeds were surface-sterilized with 5 % (v/v) sodium hypochlorite and then placed onto perlite-filled Eppendorf tubes floating on full-strength Hoagland solution. The nutrient solution contained 5 mm Ca(NO3)2, 5 mm KNO3, 2 mm MgSO4, 1 mm KH2PO4, 0·01 mm Fe-EDTA, 10 µm H3BO3, 1 µm MnSO4, 5 µm ZnSO4, 0·5 µm CuSO4, 0·1 µm (NH4)6Mo7O24 and 10 µm AlCl3. Seedlings were pre-cultivated for 9 d – until the appearance of the first leaves – and then the nutrient solution was changed and supplemented with 0 (control), 50, 150 and 300 µm ZnSO4 for 7 d. Control plants were grown in full-strength Hoagland solution containing 5 µm ZnSO4. The plants were kept in a greenhouse at a photon flux density of 150 µmol m−2 s−1 (12/12 h light/dark cycle) at a relative humidity of 55–60 % and 25 ± 2 °C for 7 d.

All chemicals used during the experiments were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless stated otherwise.

Element content analysis

The concentrations of microelements were measured by using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS; Thermo Scientific XSeries II, Asheville, NC, USA) according to Lehotai et al. (2012). Root and shoot material of control, 50, 150 and 300 µm Zn-treated B. juncea and B. napus were harvested separately and rinsed with distilled water to remove the potentially attached Zn from their surface. After 72 h of drying at 70 °C, 65 % (w/v) nitric acid and 30 % (w/v) H2O2 (both from Reanal, Budapest, Hungary) were added to the samples, which were subjected to 200 °C and 1600 W for 15 min. Values of Zn and other microelement concentrations are given in µg g−1 dry weight (d. wt).

Morphological measurements

Fresh weights (g) of the root material were measured on the seventh day of the treatment using a balance. The length of the primary root (PR; cm) and the first six lateral roots (LRs) from the root collar (cm) were also determined manually. Also the visible LRs were counted and their number is expressed as pieces per root. The root fresh weight and the PR length are expressed as a percentage of control.

Microscopic determination of Zn distribution, callose deposition, lipid peroxidation and loss of viability in the root tissues

For visualization of Zn, root tips were equilibrated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 137 mm NaCl, 2·68 mm KCl, 8·1 mm Na2HPO4, 1·47 mm KH2PO4, pH 7·4), and further incubated with 25 µm Zinquin [ethyl (2-methyl-8-p-toluenesulphonamido-6-quinolyloxy)acetate] in PBS for 1 h at room temperature in darkness according to Sarret et al. (2006). Callose deposition in the root tissues was determined by image analysis using aniline blue according to Cao et al. (2011) with slight modifications. Root samples were incubated in aniline blue solution (0·1 %, w/v in 1 m glycine) for 5 min, and then washed once with distilled water. Products of lipid peroxidation [such as malondialdehyde (MDA)] were visualized using Schiff’s reagent, according to Arasimowicz-Jelonek et al. (2009). Root tips were incubated in the dye solution for 20 min and then the reagent was replaced by 0·5 % (w/v) K2S2O5 (prepared in 0·05 m HCl) for a further 20 min. For the determination of cell viability in the root tips, fluorescein diacetate (FDA) staining was used according to Lehotai et al. (2011). Root segments were incubated in 10 µm dye solution prepared in 10 mm MES (4-morpholine ethanesulphonic acid) buffer (pH 6·15) containing 50 mm KCl, then they were washed four times with MES/KCl.

Detection of ROS and RNS

Dihydroethidium (DHE) was used for visualization of superoxide anion contents in the root tips, which were incubated for 30 min in darkness at 37 °C in 10 µm dye solution and were washed twice with 10 mm Tris–HCl, pH 7·4 (Kolbert et al., 2012). For H2O2 detection, root segments were incubated in 50 µm Ampliflu™ (10-acetyl-3,7-dihydroxyphenoxazine, ADHP or Amplex Red) solution and washed with 50 mm sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7·5, according to Lehotai et al. (2012). The NO levels in Brassica root tips were determined by 4-amino-5-methylamino-2',7'-difluorofluorescein diacetate (DAF-FM diacetate) (Kolbert et al., 2012). Root segments were incubated for 30 min in darkness at room temperature in 10 µm dye solution, and were washed twice with 10 mm Tris–HCl buffer, pH 7·4. Although DAF-FM diacetate allows only semi-quantitative analysis, it is a reliable fluorophore for in situ detection of NO in plant tissues, since it does not react with H2O2 or peroxynitrite, but it responds to NO donors and/or scavengers (Kolbert et al., 2012). For the in situ and in vivo detection of peroxynitrite (ONOO), 3'-(p-aminophenyl) fluorescein (APF) was applied (Chaki et al., 2009). The ONOO sensitivity of APF was proved in vitro, and it was also shown that the dye does not react with NO or H2O2 (Kolbert et al., 2012). Root samples were incubated in darkness at room temperature in 10 µm dye solution for 1 h and were washed twice with 10 mm Tris–HCl buffer, pH 7·4.

The roots of Brassica plants labelled with different fluorophores were investigated under a Zeiss Axiovert 200 M inverted microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) equipped with filter set 9 (excitation 450–490 nm, emission 515–∞ nm) for DHE, filter set 10 (excitation 450–490, emission 515–565 nm) for APF, DAF-FM and FDA, filter set 20HE (excitation: 546/12 nm, emission 607/80 nm) for Amplex Red or filter set 49 (excitation: 365 nm, emission 445/50 nm) for aniline blue and Zinquin. Fluorescence intensities (pixel intensity) in the meristematic zone of the primary roots were measured on digital images using Axiovision Rel. 4.8 software within circles of 100 µm radius.

Visualization of intracellular zinc compartmentalization by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM)

Root samples were washed three times alternately in deionized water and in 10 mm ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) before being incubated in 20 µm Zinpyr-1 solution (in PBS) at room temperature in darkness for 3 h (Sinclair et al., 2007). Samples were rinsed in deionized water, and immersed in 10 µm propidium iodide (PI) to label cell walls (Tsukagoshi et al., 2010). Samples were mounted in PBS and images were taken on a confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus LSM 700, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) using excitation at 488 nm with a 100 mW Ar ion laser and a× 20 Plan Apo water immersion lens with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and PI filters. Images were processed with Olympus Fluoview FV100 software and were analysed using Fiji software (http://fiji.sc/Fiji; Schindelin et al., 2012).

Measurement of the enzymatic antioxidant activity

Superoxide dismutase (EC 1.15.1.1) activity was determined by measuring the ability of the enzyme to inhibit the photochemical reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) in the presence of riboflavin in light (Dhindsa et al., 1981). For the enzyme extract, 250 mg of plant material was ground with 10 mg of polyvinyl polypyrrolidone (PVPP) and 1 mL of 50 mm phosphate buffer (pH 7·0, with 1 mm EDTA added). The enzyme activity is expressed in U g−1 fresh weight (f. wt); 1 U of SOD corresponds to the amount of enzyme causing a 50 % inhibition of NBT reduction in light.

The activity of APX (EC 1.11.1.11) was measured by monitoring the decrease of ascorbate content at 265 nm (ε = 14 mm−1  cm−1) according to a modification of the method of Nakano and Asada (1981). For the enzyme extract, 250 mg of plant material was ground with 1·5 mL of extraction buffer containing 1 mm EDTA, 50 mm NaCl and 900 µm ascorbate. Data are expressed as activity (U g−1 f. wt).

SOD activity on native-PAGE, isoform staining

Isoforms of SOD were detected in gels by a modification of the method of Beauchamp and Fridovich (1971). SOD isozymes were separated by non-denaturating PAGE on 10 % acrylamide gels, followed by sequential incubation in 2·45 mm NBT for 20 min and in 28 µm riboflavin and 28 mm tetramethyl ethylene diamine (TEMED) for 15 min in darkness. Colourless SOD bands on a dark blue background were observed after light exposure. SOD isoforms were identified by incubating gels in 50 mm potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7·0) supplemented with 3 mm KCN (inhibits Cu/Zn SOD) or 5 mm H2O2 (inhibits both Cu/Zn- and Fe-SOD) for 30 min before staining with NBT. Mn-SODs are resistant to both inhibitors.

Immunoprecipitation, SDS–PAGE and western blotting

Crude extracts from plant material were immunoprecipitated by using a Thermo Scientific Pierce Crosslink Magnetic IP/Co-IP Kit (Hudson, NH, USA). The beads were cross-linked with antibody against 3-nitrotyrosine. After purification, immunoprecipitated samples were subjected to SDS–PAGE on 12 % acrylamide gels. For western blot analysis, proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes using the wet blotting procedure. After transfer, membranes were used for cross-reactivity assays with rabbit polyclonal antibody against 3-nitrotyrosine diluted 1:2000 (Corpas et al., 2008). Immunodetection was performed by using affinity-isolated goat anti-rabbit IgG–alkaline phosphatase secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:10 000, and bands were visualized by using the NBT/BCIP reaction. As a positive control, nitrated bovine serum albumin was used.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were carried out at least twice. In each treatment, at least 10–20 samples were measured. The results are expressed as the mean ± s.e. Multiple comparison analyses were performed with SigmaStat 12 software using analysis of variance (ANOVA; P < 0·05) and Duncan’s test. In some cases, Microsoft Excel 2010 and Student’s t-test were used (*P ≤ 0·05, **P ≤ 0·01, ***P ≤ 0·001).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Zinc uptake, accumulation and microelement homeostasis in Brassica species

Increasing Zn concentrations in the nutrient solutions promoted significant increases of Zn content of the root system in both species (Fig. 1A). The two Brassica species showed no differences in their Zn uptake capacity, although in the case of the highest Zn treatment B. juncea accumulated slightly (approx. 14 %) more metal in its root system. With regard to the shoots, the treatments resulted in a concentration-dependent response of Zn content; however the values were lower by one order of magnitude than in the root. Moreover, the shoot system of B. napus contained higher (approx. 48, appprox. 33 and approx. 14 %, respectively) Zn levels compared with that of B. juncea (Fig. 1B). The results suggest an efficient root to shoot Zn translocation in both species; however, B. napus showed a better transport capacity to the aerial parts in the case of all Zn treatments. Zinc is predominantly complexed with citric and malic acid in the xylem sap. Moreover, small amounts of soluble Zn-phosphate were also found in the sap in the case of excess Zn (White et al., 1981). In our experimental system, the Brassica species at their early developmental stage (16-day-old plants) proved to be Zn accumulators, since the amount of transported Zn is >0·1 % of the shoot dry weight. Similar Zn accumulation tendencies were found in the roots and shoots of 12-day-old Brassica ssp., which were considered to be moderate Zn accumulators with some potential for phytoremediation (Ebbs and Kochian, 1997).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Zinc concentration (µg g−1 d. wt) in roots (A) and shoots (B) of control and zinc-exposed B. juncea and B. napus plants. Significant differences with respect to control plants (5 µm ZnSO4) and according to Student’s t-test (n = 10, ***P ≤ 0·001) are indicated.

In addition to Zn, the concentrations of other microelements [copper (Cu), manganese (Mn) and iron (Fe)] were also determined in the roots of Brassica species using the ICP-MS technique (Table 1). The applied Zn treatments resulted in elevated Cu contents in the root system of both Brassica species compared with the control. The lack of Zn–Cu antagonism can be explained by the discrimination between the divalent ions (Irving–Williams order). Zn and Cu use the same transporters, which can be upregulated by Zn excess, although they prefer Cu more than Zn (Fraústo da Silva and Williams, 2001). This can trigger the increase in Cu content in the two Zn-exposed Brassica species. Similarly to Cu, Fe contents of the root system showed a slight but significant increase in both species as was the case for Zn. In contrast, all the applied Zn concentrations led to a strong decrease in Mn content in the roots of both species. In Arabidopsis thaliana and Thlaspi caerulescens roots, Zn caused similar changes in Fe and Mn contents (van de Mortel et al., 2006). Moreover, in the roots of Zn-exposed Lolium perenne the Mn contents were also significantly reduced (Monnet et al., 2001). The synergistic effect we found between Fe and Zn suggests that both species may increase their Fe uptake in order to avoid Fe deficiency in leaves. In Arabidopsis roots, Zn excess notably induced the expression of the ferric-chelate reductase gene (FRO2), which contributed to the intensification of Fe uptake (van de Mortel et al., 2006). In the case of Mn, an antagonistic relationship with Zn seems to be the case in the roots of both species.

Table 1.

Copper (Cu), manganese (Mn) and iron (Fe) concentrations (µg g−1 d. wt) in roots of control and zinc-treated Brassica plants

Control 50 µm Zn 150 µm Zn 300 µm Zn
Brassica juncea
Cu 24·50 ± 0·38 173·00 ± 0·52 198·90 ± 0·49 174·80 ± 0·73
Mn 250·00 ± 1·16 24·97 ± 0·05 25·53 ± 0·07 26·02 ± 0·13
Fe 519·10 ± 4·75 864·50 ± 3·65 869·90 ± 2·71 927·90 ± 2·22
Brassica napus
Cu 27·68 ± 0·08 150·60 ± 0·50 178·60 ± 0·85 163·70 ± 0·68
Mn 145·10 ± 0·53 26·40 ± 0·09 22·02 ± 0·10 26·44 ± 0·17
Fe 1051·0 ± 4·5 1496·0 ± 6·7 1540·0 ± 11·3 1239·0 ± 7·8

Values are significantly different from the controls in both species and in case of all elements at P ≤ 0·001.

Tissue-specific and sub-cellular localization of zinc in the root of Brassica species

The tissue localization pattern of Zn in the root tips was visualized by the Zinquin fluorophore. Homogenous, low-level Zn-dependent fluorescence was detected in the root tips of control plants. With the increasing external Zn concentration, the accumulation of the fluorescent signal was most evident in the meristematic and transition zones (Fig. 2), probably because of the greater permeability of the thin walls of meristem cells to Zn ions. In the cells of the elongation zone, a lower fluorescence intensity was observed, while in the differentiation zone the Zn-associated fluorescence intensified as a result of external treatments and the root hairs also showed Zn content (see Fig. 2A). Similarly, in the root tips of Solanum nigrum, Zn exposure (400 µm ZnCl2) caused the intensification of Zinquin fluorescence, but this fluorescent signal showed a homogenous distribution within the tip (Xu et al., 2010). Although there was practically no difference between the Zn contents of the whole root system of the species (see Fig. 1A), the Zinquin fluorescence of the meristematic zones proved to be higher in Zn-treated B. juncea (Fig 2B), which suggests the higher accumulation of Zn in the root tips compared with B. napus. The increase in the fluorescent signal was not concentration dependent in either B. juncea or B. napus (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

(A) Tissue specificity of zinc localization in control and zinc-treated Brassica juncea and Brassica napus root tips. Zinc localization was visualized with the aid of the Zinquin fluorophore as described in the Materials and Methods. Scale bar = 200 µm. (B) Pixel intensities of Zinquin fluorescence measured in the PR meristem of control and zinc-treated Brassica species. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test (n = 10, P ≤ 0·05).

The sub-cellular Zn distribution within the root cells of Zn-treated Brassica was investigated by confocal microscopy in order to reveal the role of the cell wall in Zn binding. The Zn-dependent green fluorescence was most intense in the walls of the epidermal cell layer of the root. Zinc also localized in the cytoplasm and/or in vacuoles and around the surface of the nuclei of these cells, which also showed PI-dependent fluorescence, suggesting that these cells are not viable. The localization of Zn in the root cell nuclei of Zn-exposed plants was also shown by Rathore et al. (1972). In the inner cell layers of the root, mainly the apoplast showed Zn content, and most of the cells were alive (Fig. 3). Similarly to the results of Küpper et al. (2000), root epidermal cells accumulate Zn mostly in their walls. The cell wall metabolic inactivity provides advantage for metal precipitation and exclusion from the cytoplasm (Krzesłowska, 2011), which can ensure the survival in the case of metal excess (Rout and Das, 2003). Some early studies suggested that Zn is associated with the carbohydrate components of the cell wall such as hemicelluloses and pectins (Diez-Altares and Bornemisza, 1967; Turner and Marshall, 1972). Recent studies revealed that low-methylesterified pectins are the most important metal-binding components of the cell wall (Krzesłowska, 2011). The epidermal cells suffer from cell death presumably because of the presence of Zn also in their cytoplasm, while the inner cells (cortex) contain less Zn mainly in their walls, and they remain viable.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Confocal microscopic images of the root tip of 300 µm zinc-treated B. juncea. The root samples were co-stained with Zinpyr-1 and PI. (A) Lower magnification merged image of the whole root tip (A) and enlarged image showing root epidermal cells (B). Green (Zinpyr-1) fluorescence corresponds to zinc (C) and red (PI) fluorescence shows cell walls and nuclei (D). Scale bars = 100 µm.

Zinc-triggered changes in root architecture

With the increasing Zn concentrations, leaf area, and the fresh and dry weight of the shoot significantly decreased (data not shown) and chlorosis was also visible (Fig. 4A). However, necrotic lesions on the leaf blades were not observed during the experimental period. The root system is of great importance during the life of heavy metal-exposed plants, since it can contribute to tolerance, e.g. by controlling metal uptake or storage of excess metal. This supported the need for a detailed investigation of root development, which revealed differences between the Brassica species. The root tip morphology was modified by Zn excess, since the meristematic and transition zones were narrower, while the diameter of the upper regions was visibly larger than in the control root (see Fig. 2A). This Zn-induced morphological alteration was observed in both species, but it was more evident in the case of B. napus. Moreover, root hair formation was remarkably induced by Zn excess, particularly in B. napus roots (see Fig. 2A). Interestingly, the PR elongation of B. juncea was not notably affected by Zn, while in the case of B. napus it was significantly inhibited at all applied Zn concentrations (Fig. 4B). Mild stress (50 µm ZnSO4) resulted in a notable elevation of LR number in both species. Similarly, 150 µm ZnSO4 increased the number of LRs, but the effect was much less in this case. Moreover, the highest applied Zn concentration did not affect the LR development of either species (Fig. 4C). The length of the LRs was remarkably diminished by Zn exposure in both Brassica species; however, the rate of inhibition proved to be lower in 50 µm Zn-treated B. juncea than in B. napus (Fig. 4D). Based on these data, the cell elongation and division processes in the PRs and LRs are more sensitive to Zn excess than the anticlinal divisions of the pericycle cells during LR initiation. Indeed, the PR tips of Zn-treated sugarcane showed a significantly reduced mitotic index and a wide spectrum of cytotoxic effects (Jain et al., 2010). The fresh weight of the root system showed Zn-induced reduction only in B. napus, while in B. juncea Zn stress was not able to alter the fresh root biomass (Fig. 4E). The results show that Zn excess modifies the root system architecture depending on its concentration, and the effect was different in the two species. Mild Zn exposure (50 µm ZnSO4) triggered the development of the stress-induced morphogenetic response (SIMR) phenotype (Potters et al., 2009) only in B. napus, since it resulted in a shorter PR and higher number of (shorter) LRs. Similar stress-induced root development was observed, e.g. in selenium- (Se) or Cu-exposed Arabidopsis or chromium- (Cr) treated wheat plants (Hasnain and Sabri, 1997; Pető et al., 2011; Lehotai et al., 2012). In contrast, in B. juncea, LR formation was induced (more significantly than in B. napus) and the PR elongation was not affected by Zn stress, which led to the development of an extended root system compared with the control plants. It can be assumed that these developmental changes are part of the acclimation process because they can ensure better nutrient and water uptake and thus survival of the B. juncea plant.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

The effect of excess zinc on the growth of B. juncea and B. napus plants. (A) Representative photographs of 16-day-old untreated and zinc-exposed B. juncea and B. napus plants. Scale bar = 1 cm. Primary root length as a percentage of control (B), number (C) and length (D) of lateral roots, and root fresh weight as a percentage of control (E) of Brassica plants treated with 0, 50, 150 or 300 µm zinc. The lack of significance (n.s.) or significant differences according to Student’s t-test (n = 20, **P ≤ 0·01, ***P ≤ 0·001) are indicated.

Zinc stress provokes changes in the cell wall structure

Cell wall alterations, such as lignification or callose deposition, can help the plant cells to tolerate excess heavy metal by serving as a physical barrier, thus preventing the heavy metals from entering the cytoplasm. In addition to their role in heavy metal tolerance, these cell wall modifications can also be partly responsible for decreased growth.

Under Cu stress, H2O2-dependent lignin formation in the LRs of both Brassica species was found (Feigl et al., 2013), but Zn-induced lignification was not detectable in the root system (data not shown). On the other hand, the results show that excess Zn caused significant callose deposition in the roots of both species and this callose content increment was more pronounced in B. napus (Fig. 5). Similarly, callose accumulation was observed in Zn-treated bean plants (Peterson and Rauser, 1979). The deposited callose could inhibit root growth by decreasing cell wall loosening, thus preventing the passage of signal molecules or inhibiting the symplastic supply of carbon required for root growth (Jones et al., 2006; Piršelová et al., 2012). In comparison, there was no significant callose deposition induced by Cu stress either in B. juncea or in B. napus (Feigl et al., 2013), so thus it can be stated that this cell wall modification is a heavy metal-dependent process, but it is independent of the plant species.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Intensity of aniline blue-dependent fluorescence (as a percentage of control) reflecting callose levels in the root tips of control and zinc-treated Brassica plants. Significant differences according to Student’s t-test (n = 10, *P ≤ 0·05, **P ≤ 0·01, ***P ≤ 0·001) are indicated.

The Brassica species show different sensitivity to zinc stress

We characterized the degree of Zn sensitivity by detecting the viability of the root meristem (FDA labelling) and calculating the tolerance index (%) based on PR elongation. The root meristem cells of B. juncea remained fully viable even in case of 300 µm ZnSO4 treatment, while the root meristem of B. napus underwent significant loss of viability as a result of Zn exposure (Fig. 6). Based on the results, the viability status of the PR meristem cells is in accordance with the elongation capability of the root (see Fig. 4B). The tolerance indexes of Zn-treated B. juncea showed no decrease at higher concentrations of external Zn (control, 100 %; 50 µm ZnSO4, 97 %; 150 µm ZnSO4, 119 %; and 300 µm ZnSO4, 107 %); however, they decreased significantly in the case of Zn-exposed B. napus (control, 100 %; 50 µm ZnSO4, 61 %; 150 µm ZnSO4, 50 %; and 300 µm ZnSO4, 52 %). The results show that B. juncea possesses remarkable Zn tolerance compared with B. napus, which supports the species specificity of zinc sensitivity.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Viability (percentage of the fluorescein pixel intensity in control) of the root meristem cells of control and zinc-exposed Brassica plants. The lack of significance (n.s.) or significant differences according to Student’s t-test (n = 10, *P ≤ 0·05, **P ≤ 0·01, ***P ≤ 0·001) are indicated.

Altered metabolism of ROS and RNS in Zn-exposed Brassica species

The effect of Zn excess on the levels of ROS, RNS and antioxidants was determined in this work. In the roots of B. juncea, the level of superoxide anion significantly decreased as a consequence of Zn excess (Fig. 7A), which can be explained by the enhancement of SOD activity (Fig. 7B). In contrast, superoxide levels of 50 and 150 µm Zn-treated B. napus roots showed a significant increment, which was accompanied by increased SOD activity. These findings suggest that the elevated SOD activity was not able to compensate the formation of superoxide anion in the case of 50 and 150 µm Zn, although it could reduce the superoxide content during severe Zn stress (300 µm). We separated the different SOD isoforms by native-PAGE, and five activity bands were identified in the case of both species (Fig. 8). The pattern obtained is in agreement with the result published by Cohu and Pilon (2007) in the case of B. juncea; however, we found a different configuration of SOD isoforms in B. napus compared with what was found by Abedi and Paniyat (2010). The experiments with specific inhibitors showed that the uppermost band represented an Mn-SOD isoform, whose activity decreased due to the increasing Zn concentrations in both species, but particularly in B. napus. The decrease of Mn-SOD activity can be explained by the reduced availability of Mn as previously shown in Table 1. The Fe-SOD isoform was hardly visible in the case of B. juncea and only present in the control sample of B. napus. The last three bands showed Cu/Zn-SODs, whose strengths were correlated with the overall SOD activity (see Fig. 6B). Similarly to our results, the decrease in the activity of all three isoenzymes has been shown previously, e.g. in cadmium-exposed pea plants (Sandalio et al., 2001).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Effect of Zn excess on the metabolism of ROS and RNS. The levels of superoxide radicals (pixel intensity of DHE fluorescence; A), total SOD activity (B), H2O2 (pixel intensity of resorufin fluorescence; C), APX activity (D), NO (pixel intensity of DAF-FM fluorescence; E) and ONOO (pixel intensity of APF fluorescence; F) in control and zinc-treated Brassica roots (in meristematic zone) are shown. (G) Representative microscopic images of Brassica root tips stained with different fluorophores (from left: DHE for superoxide in B. napus, Ampliflu™ for H2O2 in B. napus, DAF-FM for NO in B. napus, APF for ONOO in B. napus). The fluorescent staining procedures were carried out in the root tips, while enzymatic activities were measured in the whole root system as described in the Materials and Methods. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test (n = 10, P ≤ 0·05).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Analysis of SOD isoforms. SOD isoforms were separated by native-PAGE and stained by a photochemical method using 30 µg of protein per lane.

The level of H2O2 remained low in Zn-treated B. juncea (Fig. 7C), and the pattern of APX activity (Fig. 7D) could partly explain the H2O2 profile. In contrast, in B. napus the highest applied Zn concentration resulted in an extreme H2O2 accumulation, but APX did not vary compared with control plants (Fig, 7C and D, respectively). Zn-triggered ROS formation and modification of antioxidant capacity have been reported previously, e.g. in sugarcane, bean, maize and pea (Chaoui et al., 1997; Lozano-Rodríguez et al., 1997; Jain et al., 2010).

In the root tips of both examined species, NO formation was detectable in a concentration-dependent manner; however, this elevation was statistically significant only in the roots of B. juncea (Fig. 7E). There are several possible mechanisms of NO formation in this system. Xu et al. (2010) reported that Zn-induced Fe deficiency can be partially responsible for NO production in Solanum nigrum root tips, although in our experiments, Zn-induced Fe deficiency was not observed (see Table 1). The major enzymatic source of NO in the roots is nitrate reductase, but this activity was not influenced by Zn excess in Brassica roots (Bartha et al., 2005). Furthermore, the transition metal-triggered decomposition of NO pools such as GSNO (Smith and Dasgupta, 2000) may result in NO liberation in Zn-exposed Brassica roots, but this possibility remains to be examined. Nitric oxide may react with superoxide anion yielding peroxynitrite (ONOO), a powerful oxidative and nitrosative agent (Arasimowicz-Jelonek and Floryszak-Wieczorek, 2011). The significant Zn-induced enhancement of peroxynitrite content in both species (Fig. 7F) may explain the moderate NO accumulation, since part of the NO formed was possibly transformed into peroxynitrite. This hypothesis can be supported by the decreasing superoxide levels in B. juncea (Fig 7B); while in B. napus superoxide levels remained high (Fig. 7B) and less peroxynitrite is perhaps being produced through this pathway (Fig. 7F). The SOD system is possibly playing an important role in the regulation of peroxynitrite formation, by modulating the levels of superoxide radicals in this reaction. The representative fluorescent microscopic images of the root tips stained with different fluorophores can be seen in Fig. 7G.

The significant and Zn concentration-dependent peroxynitrite formation in both species predicted protein tyrosine nitration and, therefore, this event was studied by western blot analysis using an antibody against nitrotyrosine (Fig. 9). The presence of seven nitrotyrosine-immunopositive protein bands in the untreated samples suggests that a part of the protein pool is nitrated even under control circumstances. Similarly, a basal nitration state of proteins was reported in different plant species such as sunflower, Citrus and pea (see Chaki et al., 2009; Begara-Morales et al., 2013; Corpas et al., 2013). We observed strengthening of the same seven protein bands due to the effect of 300 µm ZnSO4, which suggests the intensification of protein nitration induced by Zn excess. The enhancement of nitration levels was pronounced in both species, which implies that the proteome of both species is sensitive to nitrosative modification. Similarly, intensified tyrosine nitration was observed in salt-stressed olive leaves as well as in leaves of cold-treated pea or in water-stressed Lotus japonicus (Valderrama et al., 2006; Corpas et al., 2008; Signorelli et al., 2013); however, to our knowledge, this is the first study which demonstrates heavy metal-induced protein nitration.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.

Representative immunoblots showing protein tyrosine nitration in roots of B. juncea and B. napus plants under control conditions and subjected to 300 µm Zn. Root samples were separated by SDS–PAGE and analysed by western blotting with anti-nitrotyrosine antibody (1:2000). Commercial nitrated bovine serum albumin (NO2-BSA) was used as a positive control.

Peroxynitrite – through the formation of peroxynitrous acid (ONOOH) – can lead to lipid peroxidation, whose product – MDA – can be detected in situ histochemically (Arasimowicz-Jelonek et al., 2009). During the microscopic investigation using the Schiff’s staining procedure, the root tips of B. napus showed slight but visible pink coloration reflecting the Zn-induced increase in the MDA content (Fig. 10). In contrast, Zn-treated B. juncea root tips remained unstained. These findings suggest that the root tip cells of B. napus suffered oxidative membrane damage, while in the root tips of B. juncea there was no detectable lipid peroxidation.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10.

Microscopic images of Brassica root tips stained with Schiff’s reagent. The pink coloration indicates lipid peroxidation. Scale bar = 200 µm.

Conclusions

Taken together, these results clearly show that the morphological and physiological responses of Brassica species to Zn stress are different. In the roots of B. juncea, which possesses better Zn resistance, only a slight ROS formation, activation of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, APX) and no remarkable lipid peroxidation were observed, which reflect the lack of a Zn-induced serious oxidative stress. However, the significant production of RNS (NO and ONOO) and the occurrence of protein nitration reveal a Zn-triggered secondary, nitrosative stress in B. juncea. In contrast, as a result of Zn exposure, nitro-oxidative stress occurred in the more sensitive B. napus as a consequence of ROS and RNS accumulation, lipid peroxidation and protein tyrosine nitration. Our data reveal the existence of a relationship between ROS and RNS metabolism under Zn stress and the contribution of nitro-oxidative stress to Zn sensitivity. The results also suggest that sensitivity to Zn is determined by the level of oxidative rather than by the nitrosative processes in Brassica species.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by the European Union and the State of Hungary, co-financed by the European Social Fund in the framework of TÁMOP 4.2.4. A/2-11-1-2012-0001 ‘National Excellence Program’. The infrastructural background and the purchasing of consumables were financed by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (grant no. OTKA PD100504). Projects AGL2011-26044 and BIO2012-33904 from the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain) are also acknowledged, as is the technical assistance of Carmelo Ruiz, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Granada, Spain.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Abedi T, Pakniyat H. 2010. Antioxidant enzyme changes in response to drought stress in ten cultivars of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 46: 27–34. [Google Scholar]
  2. Apel K, Hirt H. 2004. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annual Review of Plant Biology 55: 373–399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arasimowicz-Jelonek M, Floryszak-Wieczorek J. 2011. Understanding the fate of peroxynitrite in plant cells – from physiology to pathophysiology. Phytochemistry 72: 681–688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arrivault S, Senger T, Krämer U. 2006. The Arabidopsis metal tolerance protein AtMTP3 maintains metal homeostasis by mediating Zn exclusion from the shoot under Fe deficiency and Zn oversupply. The Plant Journal 46: 861–879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bacon JR, Dinev NS. 2005. Isotopic characterization of lead in contaminated soils from the vicinity of a non-ferrous metal smelter near Plodviv, Bulgaria. Environmental Pollution 134: 247–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartha B, Kolbert ZS, Erdei L. 2005. Nitric oxide production induced by heavy metals in Brassica juncea L. Czern. and Pisum sativum L. Acta Biologica Szegediensis 49: 9–12. [Google Scholar]
  7. Beauchamp C, Fridovich I. 1971. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry 44: 276–287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Begara-Morales JC, Chaki M, Sánchez-Calvo B, et al. 2013. Protein tyrosine nitration in pea roots during development and senescence. Journal of Experimental Botany 64: 1121–1134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bi X, Feng X, Yang Y, et al. 2006. Environmental contamination of heavy metals from zinc smelting areas in Hezhang County, western Guizhou, China. Environment International 32: 883–890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bonnet M, Camares O, Veisseire P. 2000. Effects of zinc and influence of Acremonium lolii on growth parameters, chlorophyll a fluorescence and antioxidant enzyme activities of ryegrass (Lolium perenne L. cv. Apollo). Journal of Experimental Botany 346: 945–953. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Broadley MR, White PJ, Hammond JP, Zelko I, Lux A. 2007. Zinc in plants. New Phytologist 173: 677–702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cao P, Sun J, Zhao P, Liu H, Zheng G. 2011. A new putative plasmodesmata protein, At1g19190 in Arabidopsis. African Journal of Biotechnology 10: 17409–17423. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chaki M, Valderrama R, Fernández-Ocaña AM, et al. 2009. Protein targets of tyrosine nitration in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hypocotyls. Journal of Experimental Botany 60: 4221–4234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chang HB, Lin CW, Huang HJ. 2005. Zinc-induced cell death in rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots. Plant Growth Regulation 46: 261–266. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chaoui A, Mazhoudi S, Ghorbal MH, Elferjani E. 1997. Cadmium and zinc induction of lipid peroxidation and effects on antioxidant enzyme activities in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Science 127: 139–147. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen XY, Kim JY. 2009. Callose synthesis in higher plants. Plant Signaling and Behavior 4: 489–492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cohu CM, Pilon M. 2007. Regulation of superoxide dismutase expression by copper availability. Physiologia Plantarum 129: 747–755. [Google Scholar]
  18. Corpas FJ, Barroso JB. 2013. Nitro-oxidative stress vs oxidative or nitrosative stress in higher plants. New Phytologist 199: 633–635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Corpas FJ, del Río LA, Barroso JB. 2007. Need of biomarkers of nitrosative stress in plants. Trends in Plant Science 12: 436–438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Corpas FJ, Chaki M, Fernández- Ocaña A, et al. 2008. Metabolism of reactive nitrogen species in pea plants under abiotic stress conditions. Plant and Cell Physiology 49: 1711–1722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Corpas FJ, Leterrier M, Valderrama R, Airaki M, Chaki M, Palma JM, Barroso JB. 2011. Nitric oxide imbalance provokes a nitrosative response in plants under abiotic stress. Plant Science 181: 604–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Corpas FJ, Palma JM, del Río LA, Barroso JB. 2013. Protein tyrosine nitration in higher plants grown under natural and stress conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science 4: 29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Diez-Altares C, Bornemisza E. 1967. The localization of zinc-65 in germinating corn tissues. Plant and Soil 26: 175–188. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dhindsa RS, Plumb-Dhindsa P, Thorpe TA. 1981. Leaf senescence: correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. Journal of Experimental Botany 32: 93–101. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ebbs SD, Kochian LV. 1997. Toxicity of zinc and copper to Brassica species: implications for phytoremediation. Journal of Environmental Quality 26: 776–781. [Google Scholar]
  26. Feigl G, Kumar D, Lehotai N, et al. 2013. Physiological and morphological responses of the root system of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern.) and rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) to copper stress. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 94: 179–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fraústo da Silva JJR, Williams RJP. 2001. The biological chemistry of the elements, 2nd edn Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Google Scholar]
  28. Galetskiy D, Lohscheider JN, Kononikhin AS, Popov IA, Nikolaev EN, Adamska I. 2011. Phosphorylation and nitration levels of photosynthetic proteins are conversely regulated by light stress. Plant Molecular Biology 77: 461–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. González-Guerrero M, Azcón-Aguilar C, Mooney M, et al. 2005. Characterization of a Glomus intraradices gene encoding a putative Zn transporter of the cation diffusion facilitator family. Fungal Genetics and Biology 42: 130–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gow AJ, Farkouh CR, Munson DA, Posencheg MA, Ischiropoulos H. 2004. Biological significance of nitric oxide-mediated protein modifications. American Journal of Physiology . Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology 287: L262–L268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Greenacre SA, Ischiropoulos H. 2001. Tyrosine nitration: localisation, quantification, consequences for protein function and signal transduction. Free Radical Research 34: 541–581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hasnain S, Sabri AN. 1997. Growth stimulation of Triticum aestivum seedlings under Cr-stresses by non-rhizospheric pseudomonad strains. Environmental Pollution 97: 265–273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jain R, Srivastava S, Solomon S, Shrivastava AK, Chandra A. 2010. Impact of excess zinc on growth parameters, cell division, nutrient accumulation, photosynthetic pigments and oxidative stress of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 32: 979–986. [Google Scholar]
  34. Jones DL, Blancaflor EB, Kochian LV, Gilroy S. 2006. Spatial coordination of aluminium uptake, production of reactive oxygen species, callose production and wall rigidification in maize roots. Plant, Cell and Environment 29: 1309–1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kartusch R. 2003. On the mechanism of callose synthesis induction by metal ions in onion epidermal cells. Protoplasma 220: 219–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kolbert ZS, Pető A, Lehotai N, Feigl G, Ördög A, Erdei L. 2012. In vivo and in vitro studies on fluorophore-specificity. Acta Biologica Szegediensis 56: 37–41. [Google Scholar]
  37. Küpper H, Lombi E, Zhao FJ, McGrath SP. 2000. Cellular compartmentation of cadmium and zinc in relation to other elements in the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri. Planta 212: 75–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Krzesłowska M. 2011. The cell wall in plant cell response to trace metals: polysaccharide remodeling and its role in defense strategy. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 33: 35–51. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lehotai N, Kolbert Zs, Petö A, et al. 2012. Selenite-induced hormonal and signalling mechanisms during root growth of Arabidopsis thaliana L. Journal of Experimental Botany 63: 5677–5687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lingua G, Franchin C, Todeschini V, et al. 2008. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi differentially affect the response to high zinc concentrations of two registered poplar clones. Environmental Pollution 153: 137–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lozano-Rodriguez E, Hernandez LE, Bonay P, Carpena-Ruiz RO. 1997. Distribution of cadmium in shoot and root tissues of maize and pea plants: physiological disturbances. Journal of Experimental Botany 48: 123–128. [Google Scholar]
  42. Monnet F, Vaillant N, Vernay P, Coudret A, Sallanon H, Hitmi A. 2001. Relationship between PSII activity, CO2 fixation, and Zn, Mn and Mg contents of Lolium perenne under zinc stress. Journal of Plant Physiology 158: 1137–1144. [Google Scholar]
  43. van de Mortel JE, Villanueva LA, Schat H, et al. 2006. Large expression differences in genes for iron and zinc homeostasis, stress response, and lignin biosynthesis distinguish roots of Arabidopsis thaliana and the related metal hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. Plant Physiology 142: 1127–1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mrozek JE, Funicelli NA. 1982. Effect of zinc and lead on germination of Spartina alterniflora Loisel seeds at various salinities. Environmental and Experimental Botany 22: 23–32. [Google Scholar]
  45. Nakano Y, Asada K. 1981. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant and Cell Physiology 22: 867–880. [Google Scholar]
  46. Nieboer E, Richardson DHS. 1980. The replacement of the nondescript term ‘heavy metal’ by a biologically significant and chemically significant classification of metal ions. Environmental Pollution B1: 3–26. [Google Scholar]
  47. Peterson CA, Rauser WE. 1979. Callose deposition and photoassimilate export in Phaseolus vulgaris exposed to excess cobalt, nickel, and zinc. Plant Physiology 63: 1170–1174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pető A, Lehotai N, Lozano-Juste J, et al. 2011. Involvement of nitric oxide and auxin in signal transduction of copper-induced morphological responses in Arabidopsis seedlings. Annals of Botany 108: 449–457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Piršelová B, Mistríková V, Libantová J, Moravčíková J, Matušíková I. 2012. Study on metal-triggered callose deposition in roots of maize and soybean. Biologia 67: 698–705. [Google Scholar]
  50. Potters G, Pasternak TP, Guisez Y, Jansen MA. 2009. Different stresses, similar morphogenic responses: integrating a plethora of pathways. Plant, Cell and Environment 32: 158–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Radi R. 2004. Nitric oxide, oxidants and protein nitration. Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences, USA 101: 4003–4008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rathore VS, Bajaj YPS, Wittwer SH. 1972. Subcellular localization of zinc and calcium in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) tissues. Plant Physiology 49: 207–211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Rout GR, Das P. 2003. Effect of metal toxicity on plant growth and metabolism: I. Zinc. Agronomie-Sciences des Productions Vegetales et de l’Environnement 23: 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  54. Sandalio LM, Dalurzo HC, Gómez M, Romero-Puertas MC, del Río LA. 2001. Cadmium-induced changes in the growth and oxidative metabolism of pea plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 2115–2126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sarret G, Harada E, Choi YE, et al. 2006. Trichomes of tobacco excrete zinc as zinc-substituted calcium carbonate and other zinc-containing compounds. Plant Physiology 141: 1021–1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, et al. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods 9: 676–682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Schützendübel A, Polle A. 2002. Plant responses to abiotic stresses: heavy metal-induced oxidative stress and protection by mycorrhization. Journal of Experimental Botany 53: 1351–1365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Signorelli S, Corpas FJ, Borsani O, Barroso JB, Monza J. 2013. Water stress induces a differential and spatially distributed nitro-oxidative stress response in roots and leaves of Lotus japonicus. Plant Science 201: 137–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sinclair SA, Sherson SM, Jarvis R, Camakaris J, Cobbett CS. 2007. The use of the zinc-fluorophore, Zinpyr-1, in the study of zinc homeostasis in Arabidopsis roots. New Phytologist 174: 39–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Sjölund RD. 1997. The phloem sieve element: a river runs through it. The Plant Cell 9: 1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Smith JM, Dasgupta TP. 2000. Kinetics and mechanism of the decomposition of S-nitrosoglutathione by ascorbic acid and copper ions in aqueous solution to produce nitric oxide. Nitric Oxide 4: 57–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Stoyanova Z, Doncheva S. 2002. The effect of zinc supply and succinate treatment on plant growth and mineral uptake in pea plant. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 14: 111–116. [Google Scholar]
  63. Turner RG, Marshall C. 1972. The accumulation of zinc by subcellular fractions of roots of Agrostis tenuis Sibth. in relation to zinc tolerance. New Phytologist 71: 671–676. [Google Scholar]
  64. Tsukagoshi H, Busch W, Benfey PN. 2010. Transcriptional regulation of ROS controls transition from proliferation to differentiation in the root. Cell 143: 606–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Valderrama R, Corpas FJ, Carreras A, et al. 2006. The dehydrogenase-mediated recycling of NADPH is a key antioxidant system against salt-induced oxidative stress in olive plants. Plant, Cell and Environment 29: 1449–1459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. van der Vliet A, Eiserich JP, Shigenana MK, Cross CE. 1999. Reactive nitrogen species and tyrosine nitration in the respiratory tract: epiphenomena or a pathobiologic mechanism of disease? American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 160: 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wang C, Zhang SH, Wang PF, et al. 2009. The effect of excess Zn on mineral nutrition and antioxidative response in rapeseed seedlings. Chemosphere 75: 1468–1476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wang Y, Loake GJ, Chu C. 2013. Cross-talk of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in plant programed cell death. Frontiers in Plant Science 4: 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. White MC, Baker FD, Chaney RL, Decker AM. 1981. Metal complexation in xylem fluid. II. Theoretical equilibrium model and computational computer program. Plant Physiology 67: 301–310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wintz H, Fox T, Wu YY, et al. 2003. Expression profiles of Arabidopsis thaliana in mineral deficiencies reveal novel transporters involved in metal homeostasis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278: 47644–47653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. World Health Organization. 2005. Comparative quantification of health risks: global and regional burden of diseases attributable to selected major risk factors, vols 1–3 Geneva, World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  72. Xu J, Yin H, Li Y, Liu X. 2010. Nitric oxide is associated with long-term zinc tolerance in Solanum nigrum. Plant Physiology 154: 1319–1334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Zarcinas BA, Ishak CF, McLaughlin MJ, Cozens G. 2004. Heavy metals in soils and crops in Southeast Asia. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 26: 343–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES