Skip to main content
BMB Reports logoLink to BMB Reports
. 2015 May;48(5):256–265. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2015.48.5.100

iPSC technology-Powerful hand for disease modeling and therapeutic screen

Changsung Kim 1,*
PMCID: PMC4578564  PMID: 25104399

Abstract

Cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases are major health threats in many developed countries. Recently, target tissues derived from human embryonic stem (hES) cells and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), such as cardiomyocytes (CMs) or neurons, have been actively mobilized for drug screening. Knowledge of drug toxicity and efficacy obtained using stem cell-derived tissues could parallel that obtained from human trials. Furthermore, iPSC disease models could be advantageous in the development of personalized medicine in various parts of disease sectors. To obtain the maximum benefit from iPSCs in disease modeling, researchers are now focusing on aging, maturation, and metabolism to recapitulate the pathological features seen in patients. Compared to pediatric disease modeling, adult-onset disease modeling with iPSCs requires proper maturation for full manifestation of pathological features. Herein, the success of iPSC technology, focusing on patient-specific drug treatment, maturation-based disease modeling, and alternative approaches to compensate for the current limitations of patient iPSC modeling, will be further discussed. [BMB Reports 2015; 48(5): 256-265]

Keywords: Disease modeling, Drug screen, IPSC, Patient specific therapy, Stem cell

INTRODUCTION

Conventional disease modeling studies, using animal models and immortalized cell systems, have been consistently used to study disease pathology and therapeutic development (1). Artificially manipulated cells have been used to screen therapies for monogenic diseases, such as cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and congenital heart disease (2). Although monogenic diseases have been actively studied to identify cures, multiple mutations, as seen in compound-mutation diseases, have not been analyzed for drug screening. It has been challenging to design disease models that involve multiple genes and mimic most human diseases (1, 3). Interestingly, 95% of new drugs screened using artificially manipulated cells were withdrawn due to off-target effects (4).

To alleviate the problems associated with off-target effects, studies using human tissues have been suggested. However, studies using human samples pose some major challenges. First, it is difficult to obtain fresh human disease samples. Second, it is not possible to critically observe the development of pathological features, since most of the human samples are obtained from the end stages of the disease or postmortem. Hence, human iPSC disease modeling has emerged as an alternative modeling method for obtaining both important human pathology data and unlimited resources. Since 2008, there has been rapid development of iPSC-mediated disease modeling and novel therapy options (5) (Table 1). Human iPSC disease modeling has key advantages compared to its predecessors. For example, it provides a complicated genetic signature of human tissue and an unlimited resource for identifying the mechanism underlying pathology development and for developing novel cures.

Table 1. Successful human iPSC mediated therapy cases.

Disease Mutations Disease pathology found Disease mechanism found Patient specific therapy suggested Reference

Leopard syndrome PTPN11 YES NA NA (22)
LQT1 KCNQ1 (R190Q) YES NA NA (16)
LQT2 KCNH2 (A614V) YES NA NA (17)
LQT8 CACNA1C YES NA NA (18)
LQT3- SCN5A (F1473C), KCNH2 (K897T) YES YES YES* (20)
ARVD/C PKP2 YES YES NA (55)
Brugada PKP2 YES YES NA (78)
Schizophrenia Not identified YES YES YES (32)
AD Sporadic & familial (APP) YES YES YES (28)
AD PS1 (A246E) & PS2 (N141I) YES YES YES (29)
AD Sporadic & APP (duplication) YES YES YES (31)
ALS SOD1 (+/A4V), SOD1 (+/D90A) YES YES YES (48, 49)
SMA SMN1 YES YES YES (44, 46)
HD HTT YES YES YES** (52, 53)
PD PINK, Parkin, LRRK2 YES YES YES (54, 56)
RTT MECP2 YES YES (37)
PWS Chromosome 15q11-q13 deletion YES NA NA (43)
Hepatic disorder AAT YES YES YES** (62)

*Living patient therapy has been made, **Novel drug screen has been made, NA: Not applicable, PS1: Presenilin-1, PS2: Prsenlilin-2, APP: Amyloid Precursor Protein, PKP2: Plakophilin-2.

In this review, I have discussed the success obtained with congenital and sporadic disease modeling using iPSCs for representative diseases. Furthermore, the importance of tissue-specific maturation in disease modeling has been discussed. Last, the importance of hES- and iPSC-based drug screening in cardiology, collectively human cell-based screening, has been addressed with respect to reducing unwanted toxicity issues and obtaining an amenable outcome for new therapies.

OVERVIEW OF iPSC

There has been massive interest in the application of iPSCs since studies by Dr. Yamanaka first reported mouse and human iPSC generation (6, 7). The LIF-dependent mouse iPSC and bFGF-based human iPSC cultures differed from each other, but their basis for transformation was identical (6, 7). For example, Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (Yamanaka factors) were used as transforming factors in both cases. Initially, a retrovirus was used to generate iPSCs. Later, inducible lentiviruses, mRNAs, DNA episomes, peptides, and non-integrating viruses, such as the Sendai virus, were developed to generate iPSCs (8).

Both ethical and translational obstacles in hES cell-based human therapies were overcome by Yamanaka’s iPSC technology. The potential to generate many types of vital tissues and cells, such as hematopoietic stem cells, heart muscles, and motor neurons, brought worldwide attention to the potential of this patient-specific cell-based therapy (9).

Researchers envision the use of iPSCs in two main ways: as a source for cell-based therapy without immune rejection (9) and as a tool for disease modeling to identify patient-specific cures (5). In this review, successful cases of iPSC disease modeling have been presented, and suggestions for drug screening on the basis of stem cell-based tests have been discussed.

DIFFERENTIATION OF CARDIAC MUSCLE FROM iPSCs

Initial stem cell-based CM differentiation was influenced by early frog embryonic development. During gastrulation, the embryo differentiates into three layers, which further develop as the endoderm, ectoderm and mesoderm (10). Early endoderm and mesoderm induction is influenced by Nodal, which is a family member of Wnt and TGF-β. Endodermal influence on cardiac differentiation was confirmed by artificially adding endoderm into the early-stage embryo to induce ectopic heart tissue formation (11).

By mimicking early embryonic development, a three-dimensional embryonic body (3D EB) with serum-mediated spontaneous cardiac differentiation was obtained; this has been well documented (12). Moreover, adding endodermal lineage cells (END-2 co-culture) with early differentiating hES cells increased the efficiency of heart muscle differentiation up to ∼50% compared to the ∼20% efficiency obtained with the spontaneous 3D EB method (13). In 2008, Keller’s group reported the involvement of BMP4 and DKK/Wnt signaling (14) in the induction of cardiac muscle with defined media. In addition, Kamp’s group demonstrated robust CHIR99201/IWP4-mediated Wnt/β-catenin regulation, with up to 98% cardiac muscle generation from hES cells and iPSCs (15).

SUCCESSFUL PEDIATRIC CARDIAC DISEASE MODELING

Long QT (LQT)

LQT syndrome is one of the cardiac diseases that were initially studied extensively using iPSCs. A series of LQT1, LQT2, and LQT8 iPSC models has been reported since late 2010 and 2011 (16-18). LQT has 12 different subsets of categories depending on the mutations and phenotypes (19). In all three early models of LQT iPSCs, clinically available regimens, as well as novel proof-of-concept options, were tested in vitro. However, regimen usage and therapeutic efficacy trials in living patients were not reported. Recently, iPSC disease modeling was successfully used in relation to a therapeutic regimen in the clinic for an LQT3 patient with compound mutations (20).

Conventional treatment of LQT3 involves blocking an abnormally activated Na+ current (19, 21). When the Na+ channel blockers mexiletine and flecanide were used to block the Na+ current, delayed repolarization and a reduced prolonged QT interval was seen in the LQT patient (21). A study reported that the patient did not respond to any available clinical regimens before the study had begun (20); however, by increasing the beating frequency, it was observed that inactivation of the Na+ current increased and the proarrhythmic activity decreased. Furthermore, this study confirmed that an iPSC-mediated therapeutic regimen was also successful with a living patient (20).

ADULT ONSET CARDIAC DISEASE MODELING

LEOPARD syndrome

The first success in iPSC disease modeling in adult-heart disease was Leopard syndrome (22). As shown in adult heart hypertrophy, iPSC-derived CM of Leopard syndrome became bigger compared to the control CMs. Within 30 days of cell culture in regular cardiogenic media, the patient’s CM became notably bigger and more hypertrophic. This was a great success in adult-onset disease, which allowed for the study of a devastating human adult-heart disease in a much shorter time frame. In addition, from the pathology development standpoint of view, it brought the researchers’ interest in adult onset disease modeling. It was a dramatic hypertrophic feature for the Leopard syndrome iPSC CM within 30 days in culture, since patients typically develop the disease pathology in their late 40s.

Hypertrophy

Lan et al. reported reprogramming modeling with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patient-derived iPSC (23). In this study, they could not find any pathological behavior while growing regular cardiogenic culture with 3D EB forms. When singlet culture of CM was performed in indefinite stiffness plate, it revealed abnormal Ca2+ transients and arrhythmic activity, revealing delayed after depolarization (DAD) (23). Their finding brought important insight of arrhythmia disease community to accelerate adult onset disease in a dish. The residing mechanism of singlet-cultures in a dish induced hypertrophic response would be resourceful.

MORE DISEASE MODELING USING iPSCs

EARLY SUCCESS OF DISEASE MODELING USING iPSC: NEURONAL DISEASE

It is worthwhile to mention the early success history of disease modeling, such as neuronal disease, since the first suggestion of iPSC disease modeling was based on neurodegenerative disease (5). Neuronal differentiation is one of the initially differentiated target-tissue from various sources of stem cells, such as hES, hiPSC, and somatic stem cells (24). Three major protocols have been mobilized to generate neurons, such as 3D EB based spontaneous method without serum, co-culture based method, and direct-induction of neurons with various chemicals and growth factors method (24-27). Due to future therapeutic usage, various attempts to induce neurons form hES and hiPSC have been made. Upon neuronal-rosette formation after short EB-based serum free induction, CNS neurons mostly resided within rosette, and migrating PNS neurons (descendant of neural crest cells) could be separated based on their developmental property. Moreover, by adding inhibitors of TGF and BMP signaling, researchers have obtained enhanced efficiency of neuronal induction (27). Proper subtype neuronal-lineage differentiation from iPSCs has allowed researchers to decipher various pathological features to find potential cures.

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)

AD iPSC modeling is one of the most actively studied neurological disorders using iPSCs (28-30). AD is an adult-onset disease, and the underlying pathology development is not well understood. Less than 10% of the patients have familial mutations, such as Presenilin-1 (PS1), Presenilin-2 (PS2), and Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) (Table 1).

Recently, researchers found that iPSC-derived neurons from different patients showed different pathophysiology of AD, especially in the accumulation of Aβ oligomers (28, 31). Aβ-oligomer-accumulation is one of the hallmarks of AD development. This indicates the unsolved mechanism of Aβ oligomers behavior in AD patients. Israel et al. reported that only one sporadic AD patient iPSC neuron presented accumulation of Aβ oligomers (31). In both the Kondo et al. and Israel et al. reports, Aβ-oligomer accumulating neurons from individual iPSC showed increased ER-stress and cell damages due to increased reactive-oxygen-species (ROS). Although Aβ-oligomer-accumulation is not correlated with the patients’ genetic background, treatment for those affected neurons can be predicted through iPSC modeling. Furthermore, those iPSC-derived neuron data were well correlated with the patient’s regimen-data, such as DHA treatment to ameliorate ROS-mediated cell damage. AD patient iPSC-derived neuron can be a good therapeutic testing ground to find the patient’s optimal pharmacological regimen.

Schizophrenia (SCZD)

Schizophrenia (SCZD) study by Brennand et al. is one of the hallmark studies for genetically unidentified patient cases using iPSC disease modeling. In their study, they combined the data from a child-onset SCZD patient (6 year old) and 3 adult-onset SCZD patients (32). They found that genetically unknown SCZD patient samples had similar pathological signature. Both types of patients showed reduced neuritis number, postsynaptic-protein-95 (PSD95) expressions, and glutamate receptor expressions. They suggested that SCZD might share different pathological mechanisms. One candidate is the altered developmental signaling, such as Notch and Wnt signaling. It could be interpreted to have a common prevention method of SCZD among genetically-un-known SCZD patients.

More iPSC-based neuronal disorders studies have been reported in genetically identified cases. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Huntington disease (HD), Rett Syndrome (RTT), and Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) are on going subjects of therapeutic screen (33-47).

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)

Multiple groups reported ALS iPSC disease modeling (48, 49). Two recent reports used Superoxide-Dismutase-1 (SOD1) mutated patient fibroblast, which covers 20% of familial ALS cases, to generate iPSC. Kiskinis et al. performed high resolution RNA seq from SOD1+/A4V dominant mutation iPSC and ZFN-mediated isogenic control iPSC-derived MNs to narrow down the pathogenic mechanism (48). The authors found that motor neurons (MNs) from SOD1+/A4V dominant-mutation iPSC showed that the expressions of mitochondrial-related and ER-stress-mediated genes were reduced. Their genetic analysis was confirmed by mitochondrial behavior analysis and ER stress response. Furthermore, the pathogenic feature of SOD1+/A4V ALS patient iPSC MNs was found to be conserved in different genetic background, such as the GGGGCC repeat expansions in C9orf72 locus patients’ iPSC MNs.

Chen et al. found the autonomous behavior of mutated SOD1 in MNs, but not in non-MNs (49). Only in MNs, mutated SOD1+/D90A was found to bind to the 3’UTR region of neurofilament (NF)-L mRNA and interfere with the association of NF with NF-H and NF-M, resulting in NF aggregations in MNs. By restoring NF-L expression, mutated SOD1+/D90A iPSC MNs mitigated neurite degeneration. Further elucidating the ALS pathogenic mechanism by those efforts could potentially bring a novel cure for these patients.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

SMA is also a MN disease, which showed elevated MN death. Survival-motor-neuron-1 (SMN1) gene mutation causes SMA (44, 46). Sareen et al. reported that SMA patient iPSC MNs showed elevated cell death, which was accompanied with prolonged activation of caspase 3. By blocking apoptosis, they were able to improve the neurological feature of SMA MNs, indicating common treatment options for SMA.

Corti et al. introduced a different approach to SMA treatment. SMA pathology is due to homozygous mutation in SMN1; however, most patients have normal SMN2. One of the therapeutic concepts to SMA was increasing SMN1-like proteins in patient-motor neurons. If SMA patient cells were treated with VPA or tobramycin, then the intrinsic SMN2 stop codon can be bypassed to make SMN1-like products (50). In addition, treatment with a GSK3-kinase inhibitor in ES-derived MNs showed significant increase of SMN, indicating plausible outcome for future human SMA treatment (51). But, Cori et al. provided gene-edited SMN2 to mimic SMN1 in patient iPSC MNs. Their proof-of-concept trials with the gene-edited MNs transplant rescued the SMA mutant mice (46).

Huntington disease (HD)

HD is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease caused by a cytosine-adenine-guanine (CAG) repeats in the first exon of Huntington (HTT) gene. Several HD iPSCs disease modeling were reported with deepened-understanding of HD pathology development, such as mitochondria fragmentation and BDNF dependency for survival (34, 36, 47). Recently, mitochondria-fragmentations-blocker treatment and BNDF over-activation through RE-1-silencing-transcription factor (REST) regulation showed alleviated disease pathology (52, 53). Those efforts could potentially bring therapeutic benefit to many patients suffering from HD, which has no cure so far.

Rett Syndrome (RTT)

Rett syndrome (RTT) patients suffer devastating neurodevelopmental delay, mostly in females (41). RTT is caused by a mutation in methyl-CpG-binding-protein-2 (MECP2), which is highly expressed in mature neurons and glia (37). iPSC disease modeling on RTT has been reported. Furthermore, recent progress in MECP2 and IGF1 correlation could potentially bring about therapy for RTT patients (37, 40). For instance, Williams et al. rescued RTT patient iPSC-derived neurons with either IGF1 or GPE (a peptide with first 3 amino acids of IGF1) treatment, indicating future therapeutic options for RTT (37).

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS)

PWS is a disease of genetic-imprinting, especially in paternal chromosome 15q11-q13 region (39). Also, large deletion of the paternal chromosome 15q11-q13 during meiosis induces PWS (43). PWS patients suffer from neurological disorder and early-child-hood obesity. Recent generation of PWS iPSC may facilitate therapeutic suggestion for the patients, since no mice model reproduces the whole feature of PWS (43).

EVOLVING CONCEPT OF iPSC DISEASE MODELING

Maturation-based disease modeling

Recently, two reports have been published regarding maturation-based adult on-set disease modeling: one was on Parkinson’s disease (PD) and the other on the cardiac disease arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) (54, 55).

Progerin-based maturation in PD modeling

PD is one of the highly studied iPSC disease models and one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases in ageing populations (47, 54, 56). In PD, increased cell death is seen in dopaminergic neurons (DNs) with complicated genetic stress, such as mutations in α-synuclein, leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2), PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 (PINK), and parkin, as well as with environmental stress.

However, late-onset disease models using iPSCs often show incomplete penetrated pathology from patient iPSC-derived target tissues. Aged cells showed loss of the heterochromatin markers trimethylated H3K9 (H3K9me3) and heterochromatinprotein-1γ (HP1γ), but they became rejuvenated during iPSC transformation. It is often difficult to find pathological differences in embryonic stage patient iPSC DNs, considering their naïve neuronal stage. Miller et al. combined progerin, the protein associated with Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS), with PINK1-Q456X- and Parkin-V324A-mutated iPSCs to manifest robust PD pathology in vitro (54). In progeria, the lamin A in the nuclear membrane has a defect and accumulates in aged or HGPS patients. By ectopically inducing a progerin peptide in patient iPSC derived DNs, they detected robust pathological phenomena, such as loss of dendrites and increased cell death.

Metabolic maturation-based disease modeling

Recently, we analyzed patient-derived iPSC disease models in ARVD/C with metabolic maturation and noted adult-onset pathophysiological features (55). ARVD/C is an inherited cardiomyopathy that can cause sudden-cardiac-death in young adults, and a majority of these patients have the desmosome mutation (55). iPSCs from the fibroblasts of an ARVD/C patient with a homozygous c.2484C>T mutation in plakophilin-2 (PKP2) were established. Surprisingly, ARVD/C patient-derived iPSC CMs initially did not show significant abnormalities, such as cell death or lipid accumulation (55).

As cardiac muscle matures, energy metabolism switches from glucose-based non-aerobic ATP generation to aerobic and fatty acid-based β-oxidation (57). During postnatal development, the main hormones (e.g., insulin, adrenalin, and thyroid hormone) and cholesterol provide essential cues for the proper maturation and development of various organs. Cardiac energy metabolism shifts from glycolysis-based to lipid-based oxidation with the induction of three factors, that is, insulin, adrenalin, and cholesterol (55). Ectopic activation of PPAR-gamma (PPARγ) was observed in the heart of an ARVD/C patient (58). By inducing PPARγ, in addition to three factor-mediated metabolic maturation, we manifested pathological phenotypes of ARVD/C hearts within ∼60 days in culture (55). Simple PPARγ over-activation without presetting metabolically matured hES/patient iPSC-derived CMs did not induce pathological development, indicating that maturation was a prerequisite for the development of adult pathology.

Tissue culture stiffness on proper maturation

Tissue culture stiffness is a crucial factor that affects cell biology and physiology during stem cell differentiation in many tissues, such as pancreatic cells, osteoblast differentiation, and CMs (59). Studies with neonatal rat CMs showed that indefinite stiffness disrupted the regular heart-beat, even after a short period in culture (60). Human tissues, such as heart tissues, provide stiffness (approximately 10-17 kPa) to individual cardiac muscles, which supports normal beating and growth of the muscle (60, 61). To verify abnormal behaviors in LEOPARD syndrome, further correlation studies using hypertrophic iPSC-derived CMs, and tissue culture stiffness, which are important for abnormal growth and activity of tissues, may provide a valuable adult-onset iPSC disease modeling platform (22, 23).

ADVANTAGES OF USING STEM CELL-DERIVED TISSUES FOR FUTURE DRUG SCREENING

Screening drugs using iPSCs has major advantages over immortalized cell- or small animal-based screening methods, since it provides patient-specific efficacy. Efficacy and toxicity can be studied using human-derived iPSCs to minimize unwanted side effects. Furthermore, knowledge gained from iPSC disease models can provide new therapeutic options for complicated human diseases involving multiple genes, which cannot be applied with conventional disease modeling. There have been a handful of successful drug testing and efficacy trials using iPSCs in recent reports.

Novel drug candidate screen for hepatic disorders

Choi et al. recently used iPSCs from patients with alpha antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency to drive hepatocytes and to screen 3131 compounds and reported novel drug candidates for hepatic disorders (62). The most common AAT deficiency was due to a point mutation in the AAT gene, which induced spontaneous polymerization, ER protein overload in hepatocytes, and liver disorders. They found five candidates that decreased the accumulation of the mutant form of AAT in cells; all these candidates have been approved by the FDA for different diseases. Interestingly, one of their candidates, carbamazepine (CBZ), showed great efficacy in reducing hepatic fibrosis in the AAT mouse model, indicating the durability and efficacy of iPSC-based drug screening (63).

Loxapine for SCZD

The cause of SCZD is not known and treatment results for patients are variable. One interesting result from the Brennand et al. study provided important insights into the molecular basis of antipsychotic drugs, such as clozapine, loxapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and thioridazine, with SCZD iPSC neurons (32). Interestingly, one of the candidate drugs, loxapine, increased neuritis and the connectivity between neurons, explaining a possible therapeutic mechanism for SCZD. Although their studies were limited to a small number of patient iPSC lines, this human disease iPSC model allowed for the discovery of optimized treatment options for a group of patients with genetically unidentified disease.

Kenpaullone for ALS

Using stem cell-derived MNs, researchers have tried to identify substances related to MN-specific survival (64). Recently, Yang and colleagues reported a novel therapeutic regimen for ALS, using SOD1 mouse ES MNs and human ALS patient iPSC-derived MNs (65). Kenpaullone was one of the candidates that increased the survival of SOD1 mouse-derived MNs, and its efficacy was tested in human SOD1 iPSC-derived MNs. Although their initial screen was not based on iPSC MNs from ALS patients, it clearly proved to be a successful beginning for drug screening in ALS.

Human iPSC-based therapeutic safety consideration

Cardiac toxicity is an imminent factor for newly developed drugs. Recently, many newly developed and even market-available drugs have been retracted due to cardiac sudden death with QT interval increase and tachycardia-based arrhythmia attack, mostly resembling cardiac LQT syndrome. For example in 1996, an anti histamine drug, Seldane, was retracted from the market after it was attributed to 98 death cases in the United States. In addition, in early 2000 more than 8 non-cardiac post-market drugs were retracted due to severe cardio toxicity (66).

Conventional cardiac toxicity test has been performed with immortalized CHO cell based IC50 human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG= Ikr, rapid component inward rectifying K+ current) activity test for possible QT interval elongation (66, 67). Anti-HERG activity from unsafe drugs is the major cause of cardiac arrest and arrhythmia (68). QT interval elongation is the key cardiac toxicity criteria in newly invented drugs for human trials (66), and it is an important indicator for imminent threat to patients. QT interval is the time between Q and T waves during cardiac beating, and it is called electrocardiogram (ECG) recording. QT can be generally explained as the ventricular action-potential-duration (APD), such as beginning of pump in and end of pump out in the ventricle.

Many researchers suspect that the cause of cardio toxicity problem in newly developed non-cardiac drugs is due to immortalized cell based drug toxicity screen, since those cells accumulate mutations and are immune to newly developed drug-induced toxicity (69). Pharmaceutical companies often waste valuable resources due to adverse outcome of toxicity problem. In fact, the cost of QT interval toxicity check has been attributed to about 22% of the cost in phase 1 human trials in United States (67). These cases show the importance of human-oriented toxicity test. To avoid non-physiological drug candidates screen from immortalized cells with single protein over-expression setting, researchers tried human tissues, such as human heart muscle tissues, to test novel drugs.

However, it is very difficult to obtain fresh samples from patients. More often, those samples are not useful due to sample preparation errors. Liang and colleagues’ recent report (69) revealed two major findings in stem cell-based toxicity studies and iPSC-based novel therapy screen. They found that the sensitivity of Ikr K+ current inhibitions among various pro-arrhythmogenic drugs was more reliable in hES/iPSC-derived CM, rather than in hERG-expressing CHO or 293 cell lines. They showed that hERG blockage from a market-available safe drug, verapamil, was observed in a 293 cell-based toxicity study, whereas cardiac toxic Alfuzocin did not show severe toxicity in the same setting (69). In other words, safe drugs could be dismissed and dangerous drugs replaced, if researchers did not use hES/iPSC-derived CM for toxicity test. In human heart muscle, hundreds of ion channels are expressed and orchestrated. Only human ES/iPSC-derived CM faithfully mimics the milieu of human ion channels in the human heart (70).

It could be a perfect drug screening system if it can solve the drug efficacy and safety issues with the same cell-based platform. Patient iPSC-derived target tissue-based drug screening answers both needs and gives us better opportunity to find therapy (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Schematic view of novel hES/iPSC-derived CM-based human cardiac toxicity test. Ikr (rapid component of inward rectifying K+ current, hERG) is the major category to correlate possible human cardio toxicity. Decrease of hERG by drugs indicating the increase of QT interval by drugs, which induce severe cardiotoxic event.

Fig. 1.

LIMITATION OF iPSC-MEDIATED DISEASE MODELING AND RECENT PROGRESS

One of major criticisms of iPSC disease modeling is the limited numbers of comparison groups (71). Two alternative methods can solve this potential limitation of iPSC disease modeling; One is the gene editing-mediated disease modeling by inducing mutation in normal iPSC, and the other is the direct conversion from somatic source of patient samples to target tissues, such as neuron or CM.

Gene editing-based disease modeling

For human patient-derived iPSC generation, human internal review board (IRB) approval often delays or even completely blocks the study progress. Furthermore, genetically affected human tissues are very difficult to obtain for statistically significant studies. If researchers can make mutated stem cells in their own laboratory, using available normal hESs/hiPSCs, then robust studies can be conducted. There has been a movement to generate allele specific patient iPSC lines without the original samples from the patients (72). Gene editing technology provides various options to fix or mutate certain gene or genes without tracing exogenous genome. Currently, RNA-guided-engineered-nuclease (RGENs, derived from clustered-regularly-interspaced-short-palindromic-repeat (CRISPR)-Cas), zincfinger-nuclease (ZFN), and transcription-activator-like-effectornuclease (TALEN)-based disease modeling are widely utilized (73, 74).

However, gene-edited hES/iPSC may not reproduce full-blown human pathology as patient sample-derived iPSC. Disease pathology often pre-requires the patients’ life styles and complicated genetic modifiers, which only patient-derived iPSC could provide. Gene editing-mediated disease modeling from various academic institutes should be studied together with disease causing modifiers in order to make fully recapitulating human disease modeling.

Direct conversions-based disease modeling

Direct conversion is also much faster than conventional iPSCs, which require labor- and time-intensive generation/ characterization/ tests. We can avoid these numerical issues with direct tissue conversion methods. Direct conversions from patient fibroblast to neurons have been reported recently (75). Currently, more researchers would like to use human-induced neurons (hiNs)-mediated neurological disease modeling, instead of generating hiPSCs, since there are advantages to using hiNs over hiPSC (75). First, we can increase the sample numbers from a few iPSC lines to a few thousand of hiNs. Second we can focus disease studies only rather than stem cell study. Cardiac disease also became the follower to use direct conversion as tools to study disease (76, 77). However, there may be unnecessary stress during direct conversion from human patient samples, and it needs to be redirected to the disease modeling. Direct conversion can be the next solution for disease modeling, as long as the conversion process does not put unnecessary stress to the cells or cause unexpected molecular diversion, which could interfere with tissue identity and pathological development.

CONCLUSION

iPSCs are being used to develop patient-specific therapies and their use has been successful for many diseases. These patient-specific medical regimens have been considered quite successful. Compared to the success of the pediatric disease model, adult-onset disease modeling faces hurdles and challenges such as disease recapitulation and relevant therapy test issues (71). However, the recent success in adult-onset disease in ARVD/C and PD cases can be models for the ongoing iPSC-derived disease modeling community (54, 55, 78).

The key steps to identifying novel therapies include both generating target tissues from patient iPSCs and obtaining mature adult-like tissues. In addition to maturation setting, we can test novel pathophysiological approaches for generating patient-specific medicine. Studies involving international collaboration and increased numbers of patient samples and iPSC quality controls would greatly facilitate the development of novel therapies (Fig. 2). Furthermore, a combination of direct conversion-based disease models, such as hiN from patient tissue or gene editing-based mutation introduction, can strengthen the potential of stem cell-based disease modeling. We expect an unprecedented amount of important evidence to accumulate in the search for the cure for diseases.

Fig. 2. Human patients and patient gene edited iPSC/hES-mediated novel therapy development. Disease containing stem cells were differentiated into target tissue such as neurons and CM. Adult-stage-maturated target tissue will be used to screen novel therapeutic candidates or market-available drugs to find right dosage for individual patients. Novel drugs’ cardiotoxicity test will be performed while optimizing the efficacy of target hit. Optimized therapy will be pursued to live human patients.

Fig. 2.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2014R1A1A2054906) and the Original Technology Research Program funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology (2014M4A9E5073759). I thank Drs. Han Choe and Hee Chul Lee for providing critical reading.

References

  • 1.Rajamohan D, Matsa E, Kalra S, et al. Current status of drug screening and disease modelling in human pluripotent stem cells. Bioessays. (2013);35:281–298. doi: 10.1002/bies.201200053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rubin LL, Haston KM. Stem cell biology and drug discovery. BMC Biol. (2011);9:42. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-9-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Seok J, Warren HS, Cuenca AG, et al. Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2013);110:3507–3512. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222878110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Munos B. Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation. Nat Rev Drug Discov. (2009);8:959–968. doi: 10.1038/nrd2961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Park IH, Arora N, Huo H, et al. Disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell. (2008);134:877–886. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. (2007);131:861–872. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. (2006);126:663–676. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ban H, Nishishita N, Fusaki N, et al. Efficient generation of transgene-free human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by temperature-sensitive Sendai virus vectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2011);108:14234–14239. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103509108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kim C. Disease modeling and cell based therapy with iPSC: future therapeutic option with fast and safe application. Blood Res. (2014);49:7–14. doi: 10.5045/br.2014.49.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mercola M, Ruiz-Lozano P, Schneider MD. Cardiac muscle regeneration: lessons from development. Genes Dev. (2011);25:299–309. doi: 10.1101/gad.2018411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nascone N, Mercola M. An inductive role for the endoderm in Xenopus cardiogenesis. Development. (1995);121:515–523. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.2.515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim C, Majdi M, Xia P, et al. Non-cardiomyocytes influence the electrophysiological maturation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes during differentiation. Stem Cells Dev. (2010);19:783–795. doi: 10.1089/scd.2009.0349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Filipczyk AA, Passier R, Rochat A, et al. Regulation of cardiomyocyte differentiation of embryonic stem cells by extracellular signalling. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2007);64:704–718. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-6523-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang L, Soonpaa MH, Adler ED, et al. Human cardiovascular progenitor cells develop from a KDR+ embryonic-stem-cell-derived population. Nature. (2008);453:524–528. doi: 10.1038/nature06894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lian X, Hsiao C, Wilson G, et al. Robust cardiomyocyte differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells via temporal modulation of canonical Wnt signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2012);109:E1848–1857. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200250109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Moretti A, Bellin M, Welling A, et al. Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem-cell models for long-QT syndrome. N Engl J Med. (2010);363:1397–1409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Itzhaki I, Maizels L, Huber I, et al. Modelling the long QT syndrome with induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. (2011);471:225–229. doi: 10.1038/nature09747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yazawa M, Hsueh B, Jia X, et al. Using induced pluripotent stem cells to investigate cardiac phenotypes in Timothy syndrome. Nature. (2011);471:230–234. doi: 10.1038/nature09855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ruan Y, Liu N, Napolitano C, Priori SG. Therapeutic strategies for long-QT syndrome: does the molecular substrate matter? Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. (2008);1:290–297. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.795617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Terrenoire C, Wang K, Tung KW, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells used to reveal drug actions in a long QT syndrome family with complex genetics. J Gen Physiol. (2013);141:61–72. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201210899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Moreno JD, Clancy CE. Pathophysiology of the cardiac late Na current and its potential as a drug target. J Mol Cell Cardiol. (2012);52:608–619. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Carvajal-Vergara X, Sevilla A, D'Souza SL, et al. Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem-cell-derived models of LEOPARD syndrome. Nature. (2010);465:808–812. doi: 10.1038/nature09005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lan F, Lee AS, Liang P, et al. Abnormal calcium handling properties underlie familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy pathology in patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. (2013);12:101–113. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tabar V, Studer L. Pluripotent stem cells in regenerative medicine: challenges and recent progress. Nat Rev Genet. (2014);15:82–92. doi: 10.1038/nrg3563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang SC, Wernig M, Duncan ID, Brüstle O, Thomson JA. In vitro differentiation of transplantable neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. (2001);19:1129–1133. doi: 10.1038/nbt1201-1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Reubinoff BE, Itsykson P, Turetsky T, et al. Neural progenitors from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. (2001);19:1134–1140. doi: 10.1038/nbt1201-1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chambers SM, Fasano CA, Papapetrou EP, Tomishima M, Sadelain M, Studer L. Highly efficient neural conversion of human ES and iPS cells by dual inhibition of SMAD signaling. Nat Biotechnol. (2009);27:275–280. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kondo T, Asai M, Tsukita K, et al. Modeling Alzheimer's disease with iPSCs reveals stress phenotypes associated with intracellular Abeta and differential drug responsiveness. Cell Stem Cell. (2013);12:487–496. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yagi T, Ito D, Okada Y, et al. Modeling familial Alzheimer's disease with induced pluripotent stem cells. Hum Mol Genet. (2011);20:4530–4539. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang H, Doering LC. Induced pluripotent stem cells to model and treat neurogenetic disorders. Neural Plast. (2012);2012:346053. doi: 10.1155/2012/346053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Israel MA, Yuan SH, Bardy C, et al. Probing sporadic and familial Alzheimer's disease using induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. (2012);482:216–220. doi: 10.1038/nature10821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Brennand KJ, Simone A, Jou J, et al. Modelling schizophrenia using human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. (2011);473:221–225. doi: 10.1038/nature09915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ryan SD, Dolatabadi N, Chan SF, et al. Isogenic human iPSC Parkinson's model shows nitrosative stress-induced dysfunction in MEF2-PGC1alpha transcription. Cell. (2013);155:1351–1364. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kaye JA, Finkbeiner S. Modeling Huntington's disease with induced pluripotent stem cells. Mol Cell Neurosci. (2013);56:50–64. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2013.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jeon I, Lee N, Li JY, et al. Neuronal properties, in vivo effects, and pathology of a Huntington's disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells. (2012);30:2054–2062. doi: 10.1002/stem.1135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang K, Yi F, Liu GH, Izpisua Belmonte JC. Huntington's disease: dancing in a dish. Cell Res. (2012);22:1627–1630. doi: 10.1038/cr.2012.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Williams EC, Zhong X, Mohamed A, et al. Mutant astrocytes differentiated from Rett syndrome patients-specific iPSCs have adverse effects on wild-type neurons. Hum Mol Genet. (2014);23:2968–2980. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jeon I, Choi C, Lee N, et al. In Vivo Roles of a Patient-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Line (HD72-iPSC) in the YAC128 Model of Huntington's Disease. Int J Stem Cells. (2014);7:43–47. doi: 10.15283/ijsc.2014.7.1.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yang J, Cai J, Zhang Y, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells can be used to model the genomic imprinting disorder Prader-Willi syndrome. J Biol Chem. (2010);285:40303–40311. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.183392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dajani R, Koo SE, Sullivan GJ, Park IH. Investigation of Rett syndrome using pluripotent stem cells. J Cell Biochem. (2013);114:2446–2453. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ananiev G, Williams EC, Li H, Chang Q. Isogenic pairs of wild type and mutant induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines from Rett syndrome patients as in vitro disease model. PLoS One. (2011);6:e25255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Schöndorf DC, Aureli M, McAllister FE, et al. iPSC-derived neurons from GBA1-associated Parkinson's disease patients show autophagic defects and impaired calcium homeostasis. Nat Commun. (2014);5:4028. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chamberlain SJ, Chen PF, Ng KY, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell models of the genomic imprinting disorders Angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2010);107:17688–17673. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004487107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sareen D, Ebert AD, Heins BM, McGivern JV, Ornelas L, Svendsen CN. Inhibition of apoptosis blocks human motor neuron cell death in a stem cell model of spinal muscular atrophy. PLoS One. (2012);7:e39113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Egawa N, Inoue H. [ALS disease modeling and drug screening using patient-specific iPS cells]. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. (2013);53:1020–1022. doi: 10.5692/clinicalneurol.53.1020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Corti S, Nizzardo M, Simone C, et al. Genetic correction of human induced pluripotent stem cells from patients with spinal muscular atrophy. Sci Transl Med. (2012);4:165ra162. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ross CA, Akimov SS. Human-induced pluripotent stem cells: potential for neurodegenerative diseases. Hum Mol Genet. (2014);23:R17–26. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kiskinis E, Sandoe J, Williams LA, et al. Pathways Disrupted in Human ALS Motor Neurons Identified through Genetic Correction of Mutant SOD1. Cell Stem Cell. (2014);14:781–795. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chen H, Qian K, Du Z, et al. Modeling ALS with iPSCs Reveals that Mutant SOD1 Misregulates Neurofilament Balance in Motor Neurons. Cell Stem Cell. (2014);14:796–809. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wolstencroft EC, Mattis V, Bajer AA, Young PJ, Lorson CL. A non-sequence-specific requirement for SMN protein activity: the role of aminoglycosides in inducing elevated SMN protein levels. Hum Mol Genet. (2005);14:1199–1210. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Makhortova NR, Hayhurst M, Cerqueira A. A screen for regulators of survival of motor neuron protein levels. Nat Chem Biol. (2011);7:544–552. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Guo X, Disatnik MH, Monbureau M, Shamloo M, Mochly-Rosen D, Qi X. Inhibition of mitochondrial fragmentation diminishes Huntington's disease-associated neurodegeneration. J Clin Invest. (2013);123:5371–5388. doi: 10.1172/JCI70911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Charbord J, Poydenot P, Bonnefond C, et al. High throughput screening for inhibitors of REST in neural derivatives of human embryonic stem cells reveals a chemical compound that promotes expression of neuronal genes. Stem Cells. (2013);31:1816–1828. doi: 10.1002/stem.1430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Miller JD, Ganat YM, Kishinevsky S, et al. Human iPSC-based modeling of late-onset disease via progerin-induced aging. Cell Stem Cell. (2013);13:691–705. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kim C, Wong J, Wen J, et al. Studying arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia with patient-specific iPSCs. Nature. (2013);494:105–110. doi: 10.1038/nature11799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Reinhardt P, Schmid B, Burbulla LF, et al. Genetic correction of a LRRK2 mutation in human iPSCs links parkinsonian neurodegeneration to ERK-dependent changes in gene expression. Cell Stem Cell. (2013);12:354–367. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lopaschuk GD, Jaswal JS. Energy metabolic phenotype of the cardiomyocyte during development, differentiation, and postnatal maturation. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. (2010);56:130–140. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e3181e74a14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Djouadi F, Lecarpentier Y, Hébert JL, Charron P, Bastin J, Coirault C. A potential link between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor signalling and the pathogenesis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Res. (2009);84:83–90. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvp183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Eroshenko N, Ramachandran R, Yadavalli VK, Rao RR. Effect of substrate stiffness on early human embryonic stem cell differentiation. J Biol Eng. (2013);7:7. doi: 10.1186/1754-1611-7-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Engler AJ, Carag-Krieger C, Johnson CP, et al. Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heartlike elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating. J Cell Sci. (2008);121:3794–3802. doi: 10.1242/jcs.029678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Galie PA, Khalid N, Carnahan KE, Westfall MV, Stegemann JP. Substrate stiffness affects sarcomere and costamere structure and electrophysiological function of isolated adult cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc Pathol. (2013);22:219–227. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2012.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Choi SM, Kim Y, Shim JS, et al. Efficient drug screening and gene correction for treating liver disease using patient-specific stem cells. Hepatology. (2013);57:2458–2468. doi: 10.1002/hep.26237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hidvegi T, Ewing M, Hale P, et al. An autophagy-enhancing drug promotes degradation of mutant alpha1-antitrypsin Z and reduces hepatic fibrosis. Science. (2010);329:229–232. doi: 10.1126/science.1190354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Höing S, Rudhard Y, Reinhardt P, et al. Discovery of inhibitors of microglial neurotoxicity acting through multiple mechanisms using a stem-cell-based phenotypic assay. Cell Stem Cell. (2012);11:620–632. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yang YM, Gupta SK, Kim KJ, et al. A small molecule screen in stem-cell-derived motor neurons identifies a kinase inhibitor as a candidate therapeutic for ALS. Cell Stem Cell. (2013);12:713–726. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Fermini B, Fossa AA. The impact of drug-induced QT interval prolongation on drug discovery and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. (2003);2:439–447. doi: 10.1038/nrd1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zeevi-Levin N, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Binah O. Cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells for drug screening. Pharmacol Ther. (2012);134:180–188. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.De Bruin ML, Pettersson M, Meyboom RH, Hoes AW, Leufkens HG. Anti-HERG activity and the risk of drug-induced arrhythmias and sudden death. Eur Heart J. (2005);26:590–597. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Liang P, Lan F, Lee AS, et al. Drug screening using a library of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes reveals disease-specific patterns of cardiotoxicity. Circulation. (2013);127:1677–1691. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Grant AO. Cardiac ion channels. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. (2009);2:185–194. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.789081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Knollmann BC. Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: boutique science or valuable arrhythmia model? Circ Res. (2013);112:969–976. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.300567. discussion 976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Musunuru K. Genome editing of human pluripotent stem cells to generate human cellular disease models. Dis Model Mech. (2013);6:896–904. doi: 10.1242/dmm.012054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kim H, Kim JS. A guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases. Nat Rev Genet. (2014);15:321–334. doi: 10.1038/nrg3686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Maeder ML, Linder SJ, Cascio VM, Fu Y, Ho QH, Joung JK. CRISPR RNA-guided activation of endogenous human genes. Nat Methods. (2013);10:977–979. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Qiang L, Fujita R, Abeliovich A. Remodeling neurodegeneration: somatic cell reprogramming-based models of adult neurological disorders. Neuron. (2013);78:957–969. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wada R, Muraoka N, Inagawa K, et al. Induction of human cardiomyocyte-like cells from fibroblasts by defined factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2013);110:12667–12672. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1304053110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Fu JD, Stone NR, Liu L, et al. Direct Reprogramming of Human Fibroblasts toward a Cardiomyocyte-like State. Stem Cell Reports. (2013);1:235–247. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Cerrone M, Lin X, Zhang M, et al. Missense mutations in plakophilin-2 cause sodium current deficit and associate with a brugada syndrome phenotype. Circulation. (2014);129:1092–1103. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMB Reports are provided here courtesy of Korean Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES