Skip to main content
Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology logoLink to Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology
. 2015 Jun 26;4(3):256–263. doi: 10.5455/jice.20150610104841

Biomedical properties and potentiality of Lippia microphylla Cham. and its essential oils

Evelyne Rolim Braun Simões 1, Evelyne Alves Santos 1, Maria Carolina de Abreu 2, Jurandy do Nascimento Silva 3, Nárcia Mariana Fonseca Nunes 3, Marcília Pinheiro da Costa 3, Otília Deusdênia Loiola Pessoa 4, Cláudia Pessoa 1,5, Paulo Michel Pinheiro Ferreira 3,6,*
PMCID: PMC4579491  PMID: 26401417

Abstract

Lippia microphylla Cham. (Verbenaceae) is an endemic underexploited Brazilian vegetal. This work reviewed the biological potentialities of Lippia microphylla, emphasizing the properties of essential oils (EOs) and analyzed scientific indicators about genus Lippia and L. microphylla. Databases from 1948 to the present were searched and a software (vantage point 7.1) associated with Derwent Innovation Index was used to identify the indicators of the genus Lippia, and biological activities and compounds in the L. macrophylla species. Ethnopharmacological records report use of L. microphylla leaves to treat gastrointestinal disorders, influenza, bronchitis, cough, nasal congestion, and sinusitis during vaporization, whose aromatic volatile oils are rich in monoterpenes, especially cineole, terpineol, and thymol. Other EOs have larvicidal activity on Aedes aegypti larvae, and antifungal, antibacterial and cytotoxic and antitumor action on human and murine cancer cells. Brazil is the country with more articles about Lippia species, but it deposited only 9 patents since 1993. Most of the publications about L. microphylla are concentrated in food and chemical sciences. This bioprospection helps to choice areas of interest for capital investment and to give support for Brazilian Institutions to establish cooperation and improve technological impact at the point of view of creation and innovation.

KEY WORDS: Antitumor action, Lippia microphylla, pharmacological activity, scientific indicators, terpenes

INTRODUCTION

About 80% of the worldwide population use herbal products for their basic health care (primary care), such as extracts, teas and their active principles, a market estimated at US$ 50 billion per year [1]. Despite the interest in molecular modeling, combinatorial chemistry and other chemical synthesis techniques by institutions and pharmaceutical industries, the natural products, particularly medicinal plants, persist as an important source of new therapeutic agents against infectious (fungal or bacterial) and cardiovascular diseases, insects, cancer, and immunomodulation [2-6].

Genus Lippia (Verbenaceae, Lamiales/Magnoliopsida) includes about 200 species of herbs, shrubs and small trees mainly distributed in Central and South Americas and in Africa Tropical [7-8]. Some Lippia species are prevalent at “Caatinga” biome, a region with approximately 1,539,000 km2, distributed in nine Brazilian Northeastern states, with warm and dry climate and where grows a peculiar xerophyte vegetation. In “Caatinga flora,” there are almost 1 000 vascular plant species. Because of the extreme climate conditions most species are endemic and present particular morphological adaptations [3,4,9,10].

Among the Lippia species, L. microphylla Cham. (Syn.: L. microphylla Cham. and Schlecht.; L. microphylla Mart.; Lantana microphylla Mart. ex Uphof.) is recognized for its therapeutic usages [Figure 1] [11]. A few studies have explored specific therapeutic points of L. microphylla. Then, this work aimed to review its biological potentialities, emphasizing the properties of essential oils (EOs). Moreover, in order to suggest a strategic plan for genus Lippia and L. microphylla, main publication areas, its respective patents and institutions and authors were also analyzed to identify studies and orientate the development of pharmaceutical products.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

General aspects of Lippia microphylla Cham

For a complete and reliable review, primary and secondary resources were used, including original and review articles, books and government documents written in English, Portuguese or Spanish. Databases searched were Lilacs-Bireme (Databases on Latin American Health and Biological Sciences), MEDLINE/Index Medicus (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online), Web of Science, PubMed (maintained by the National Library of Medicine) and Science Direct. A software (Vantage Point 7.1) associated with Derwent Innovation Index was used to performer bibliometric analyses, data generation, and identification of quantitative scientific indicators from 1948 to the present. Therefore, it was used the following keywords: Lippia, biological properties, cytotoxicity, folk use, L. microphylla, and EOs. Vantage Point version 7.1 is a powerful text-mining tool for discovering knowledge in search results from patent and literature databases, giving a better perspective about information and enabling to clarify relationships and find critical patterns in distinct areas of expertise.

L. microphylla Cham: Phytochemistry and Pharmacology

Lippia species have shown a large number of important usages in folk medicine for various diseases, particularly in the treatment of cough, bronchitis, indigestion, liver, hypertension, dysentery [12-14], worms, and skin diseases [15]. Many species have promising biological activities, including antiviral [16], antimalarial [17], anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antipyretic [18], molluscicidal against Biomphalaria glabrata [15], antimicrobial [19-25], insecticidal [26], and anticonvulsant [27] properties. Compounds isolated from Lippia also revealed in vitro antitumor activity on leukemia (K-562, HL-60, CEM), colon (HCT-116), breast (MCF-7), glioblastoma (U-251), and prostate (PC -3) cell lines [28-30]. Besides its medicinal properties, the leaves of the most Lippia species are used for food preparation. Moreover, it is interesting to note the importance of Leptotyphlops dulcis, whose main component of leaves and flowers is (+)-hernandulcine, a molecule 1000-fold sweeter than sucrose [14,31,32].

Popularly called as “alecrim-da-chapada,” “alecrim-de-tabuleiro,” “alecrim-pimenta” and “alecrim-do-mato” in the Northeast Brazilian, L. microphylla is a deciduous shrub with a thin and brittle stem (up to 2 m in height), white flowers and with simple and aromatic leaves, which presents serrate margins and evident nerves with no more than 1 cm in length [11,33,34].

Ethnopharmacological records report the use of L. microphylla leaves to treat gastrointestinal disorders and influenza, bronchitis and sinusitis during vaporization resulting from boiling water. Phytochemical studies revealed the presence of quinones and flavonoids from stem and roots’ ethanol extracts [33,34]. Meanwhile, its aromatic volatile oils extracted by water vapor exhibit an EOs rich in monoterpenes, especially cineole, and terpineol, its more likely active principles.

Secondary metabolites of plants, many of them produced to protect against microorganisms and predator insects, are natural candidates for the discovery of new active products [5,6,25,35,36]. The cineole is responsible for the Eucalyptus globulus balsamic activity. The saturated antiseptic and balsamic vapors with cineole and other EOs found in L. microphylla lighten respiratory tract mucous membranes during congestion, which explains its folk use for the treatment of influenza, cough and nasal congestion. Its compounds are capable of fluidizing bronchial secretion, facilitating expectoration, and decreasing cough reflex and refreshing breath. Due to these balsamic properties, home practices of inhalation to alleviate symptoms of respiratory diseases are considered an easy way to treat them. To prepare the inhalation, leaves (50-60 g) are put in boiling water, and the person inhales the fumes through a resistant funnel, being careful to heat both parts of the face where sinus are positioned. If the EO is available, it should be used 1-2 mL per 1-2 L of boiling water [11].

Some works published previously have also highlighted the insecticidal importance of the EOs presented in Lippia species [37-40]. EOs of L. microphylla, in particular, showed significant larvicidal activity on A. aegypti larvae, with a LD50 of 75.6 ppm [39]. Gleiser et al. [41] showed that Lippia integrifolia and Lippia junelliana oils are potent repellents against A. aegypti adult insects. Both species contained similar quantities of limonene and camphor (20.7% and 26.5%), though they differ in others such as myrcene that was detected in L. junelliana (14.1%) and methylheptenone in L. integrifolia (24.9%). Limonene is a registered active element in pesticide products used as insecticide and repellent, and cotton fabrics treated with limonene have shown repellence against Anopheles mosquitoes. In addition, repellent properties against A. aegypti have been reported for limonene, camphor, and myrcene [42,43]. Thus, it is possible that the higher repellence of L. junelliana compared to L. integrifolia is due to the additional repellent effect of myrcene and this compound can be responsible for the insecticidal activity found in L. microphylla, since myrcene is also present in its leaves [44].

Oils from L. microphylla also revealed antifungal (strains of Aspergillus niger, Fusarium spp., Rizhopus spp., and Rhizoctonia solani) and antibacterial activities (Staphylococcus aureus, Shigella flexneri, Escherichia coli, and Streptococcus pyogenes) using gel diffusion methods [20,45,46]. A tolerance of Gram-negative bacteria to EOs, such as E. coli, has been attributed to the existence of a hydrophilic outer layer, which may be blocks the infiltration of hydrophobic components throughout the cell membrane. On the other hand, the inhibitory action of natural products on mold cells involves cytoplasm granulation, plasmatic membrane disrupting and inactivation and/or synthesis inhibition of enzymes. These actions can appear isolate or simultaneously, leading to the mycelium propagation, and growth inhibition [47]. In fact, oils rich in monoterpenic compounds are reported to exhibit high levels of antimicrobial activity [48]. Moreover, they are probably responsible, at least in part by the antioxidant activity in L. microphylla extracts [49].

Volatile Components of L. microphylla

In the Verbenaceae family, genus Lippia products great quantities of volatile mixtures. Chemical studies by gas chromatographic techniques of volatile constituents from L. microphylla leaves resulted in the identification of α-pinene (1), sabinene (2), β-pinene (3), β-myrcene (4), p-cymene (5), 1,8-cineole (6), γ-terpinene (7), 4-terpineol (8), a-terpineol (9), anisole (10), thymol (11), and carvacrol (12) [Figure 2]. Among them, the main components are 1, 8-cineol (36%), β-pinene (11%), and thymol (11%) [44]. Silva et al. [50] identified the germacrene D (13) and bicyclogermacrene (14) [Figure 2] from EOs and hexanic fractions as the most common compounds in specimens collected in dry and rainy periods, while the major monoterpene was α-pinene.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Volatile essential oils from Lippia microphylla Cham

Fixed Components of L. microphylla

Analyses of the fixed constituents of the ethanolic extracts of L. microphylla roots and stems result in isolation of a flavonol glycoside (15) and four quinones, two prenylated naphthoquinone dimers (16 and 17) and two furan naphthoquinones (18 and 19) [Figure 3]. Among these, microphyllaquinone (16) and a mixture of 6-methoxy- and 7-methoxy-naphtho[2,3-b]-furan-4,9-quinones (18 + 19, respectively) isolated from L. microphylla were evaluated for their cytotoxicity, using 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) method [51], which analyzes the ability of living cells to reduce the yellow dye MTT to a purple formazan product. According to Santos et al. [34], the molecules microphyllaquinone and the mixture demonstrated cytotoxic potential against a panel of different murine and human cancer cell lines (B-16 [murine melanoma], CEM [lymphocyte leukemia], HL-60 [promyelocyte leukemia], HCT-8 [colon adenocarcinoma,] and MCF-7 [breast adenocarcinoma]), with IC50 values ranging from 0.69 to 3.13 µg/mL [Table 1].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Fixed components of Lippia microphylla Cham

Table 1.

Cytotoxicity of naphthoquinones isolated from L. microphylla and analyzed by MTT assay after 72 h exposure

graphic file with name JIE-4-256-g003.jpg

The EO of L. microphylla leaves also showed in vitro cytotoxic action on Sarcoma 180 (IC50 of 100.1 [94.9-105.5] µg/mL) and human chronic myelocyte leukemia K-562 cells (IC50 of 51.9 [47.9-56.3] µg/mL) [Table 2]. Lytic activity was not detected in normal erythrocytes from Swiss mice at a concentration of 250 µg/mL. After 7 days of treatment, this same oil presented in vivo antitumor action in a dose-dependent way, and tumor growth inhibition of 38.2% and 59.8% (50 and 100 mg/kg, respectively) [52].

Table 2.

In vitro antitumor activity of the essential oil from L. microphylla leaves determined by MTT assay after 72 h exposure

graphic file with name JIE-4-256-g005.jpg

Interestingly, in the presence of cyclosporine A, an inhibitor of the pore formation in the mitochondrial permeability transition, it was detected reduction in the cytotoxicity on Sarcoma 180 cells with this EO (IC50 of 118.3 [113.7-123.1] µg/mL). Hence, declining in cytotoxicity in the presence of cyclosporine A is indicative of the intrinsic pathway involvement in the mechanism of death [Table 2], whereas after adding pore inhibitors, probably occurred the mitochondrial pores’ opening blocking, which inhibited the release of pro-apoptotic proteins and reduced the cytotoxicity of the oil. Similarly, when K-562 cells were treated with the EO in the presence of N-acetylcysteine, an antioxidant molecule and scavenger of free radicals that stimulates the biosynthesis of reduced glutathione, cytotoxicity diminution of the oil was also evidenced [52,53]. Then, it was proposed that reactive oxygen species (ROS) production is involved, at least partially, in the mechanism of cytotoxicity on K-562 cells, and activation of apoptotic intrinsic pathways in Sarcoma 180 cells. In fact, mitochondrial membrane permeabilization culminates in cytochrome c release. Cytochrome c binds to Apaf-1 (apoptotic protease-activating factor 1) and generate the catalytically active form of caspase-9, which activates caspase-3, the most important effector caspase that acts as an effective DNase to slice the genomic DNA into nucleosomes, producing fragments of 180-200 base pairs, degradation of laminin and mitotic apparatus proteins and nuclear and cellular reduction and pyknosis [54,55].

Releasing of the molecules due to alterations in mitochondrial permeability transition leads to the loss of cellular homeostasis, preventing ATP synthesis, and increasing production of ROS. Studies of certain antineoplasic agents in distinct cell lines have demonstrated that some substances execute their activity by oxidative stress caused by ROS, generally occurring when the homeostasis of oxidation and reduction is altered within cells. Since ROS possess strong chemical reactivity with biomolecules such as proteins and DNA, this may result in DNA denaturation, leading to changes in protein synthesis and cell duplication. Furthermore, it is known that ROS induce activation of caspases-3 and -9 [55-57].

SCIENTIFIC DATA FOR PHYTOTHERAPIC DEVELOPMENT

Before formulating the action plan for implementation of the herbal medicine, we suggest the prospection of main institutions, researchers and areas of knowledge in a defined timeline to direct the strategic planning [58,59]. From this perspective, the prospecting is a manner to anticipate advances and can influence the orientation of technological trajectories [60]. Within the context of herbal medicines, this tool allows to target search according to which has already been produced, and to establish partnerships or cooperation that leverage innovation as determined by the requirements of public and private institutions and government agencies.

Using Lippia as keyword to search in the Web of Science and Derwent Innovation Index, a total of 691 articles and 94 patents were found, respectively. When the investigation was refined for L. microphylla, the number of manuscripts decreased for 10 and patents were not found. The first article citing Lippia species was published in 1948. After that, there was a vertiginous growth of manuscripts, especially in the 2000s, as seen in the Figure 4. The countries that more published about Lippia were Brazil, Argentina, México and United States of America [Figure 5].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Temporal evolution on the number of published articles involving the genus Lippia (Vantage Point 7.1)

Figure 5.

Figure 5

World participation in publications belonging to the genus Lippia (Vantage Point 7.1)

It is important to note that this rising of articles approaching Lippia species overlaps with the implantation of the National Program on Biodiversity, whose objectives include investments and management of funds to produce new medicines [58]. In fact, identifying which are the most important needs and opportunities for Research and Development (R and D) in the future, from planned interventions in innovation systems can be an important step in established programs in Brazil as the National Program on Medicinal Plants and Phytotherapics. This program, approved in 2006, aims to ensure safe access and rational use of medicinal plants and phytotherapics by the population based on the list of regulated plants by ANVISA (National Agency of Sanitary Surveillance in Brazil) [61].

In relation to Lippia species, L. alba (142 articles) and L. sidoides (97 articles) are the species that have received more attention [Figure 6]. On the other hand, L. microphylla has a few reports about its biology and pharmacology as described above. These results are confirmed by the Figure 7 that presents the areas of publications on L. microphylla, most of them concentrated in food and chemical sciences.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Number of articles about the major species belonging to the genus Lippia (Vantage Point 7.1)

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Areas of publications about Lippia microphylla (Vantage Point 7.1)

Figure 8 shows the interaction between Brazilian and international institutions. This data is extremely important to identify universities involved in the study about L. microphylla, and their partnerships and cooperation in order to direct funding, define methods and technology to implement the appropriated findings. Research groups at the Federal University of Ceará and Federal University of Paraíba are the Brazilian institutions with more articles about L. microphylla. EMBRAPA Foundation works without partnerships or, at least, it did not publish works with other institutions yet. Universities of USA (Delaware) and Mexico often work together. The academic institutions around the world are the leading centers for generation of new patentable technologies, as observed in this study. However, Brazil has low competitivity and shows little effort to innovate in the area of technological inventions, probably due to some failures in the innovation system (cooperation between government, business, and institutions to promote an effective system of production and development of medicines). Then, Brazil does not have a valuable protecting structure of Lippia species, reflecting the lack of incentives to safeguard the technologies developed using industrial property.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Institutions and their collaborations about Lippia microphylla publications (Vantage Point 7.1)

Finally, in 2004, it was promulgated a Brazilian law about Technological Innovation (number 10,973), which was regulated in 2005 (Decree 5,563). This law normalizes the incentives for the involvement of Scientific and Technological Institutions (Institutos de Ciência e Tecnologia - ICT’s) in the innovation process for innovation in companies, for the independent inventor and conception of investment funds for innovation. It is the first Brazilian law that deals with the relationship between Universities and/or Research Institutions and companies with the creation of Technological Innovation Centers (Núcleos de Inovação Tecnológica - NIT’s), helping the institutional maturity to make strategic management of intellectual property in the Brazilian ICT’s [62].

Despite a high Brazilian scientific production, these findings did not trigger large impacts on the economic development. Numbers of patents is far from the quantity of published articles, existing an abysmal between which is published which is patented, and which would become a product or service to generate work and wealth to the country [Figure 9]. Japan made its first deposit in 1990 and, currently, it is the largest holder of patents (36). Brazil arose in 1993 and deposited only 9 patents. First was recorded in 1987 [Figure 10]. Thus, these data are not consistent with the Brazilian scientific production about Lippia species and the number of published articles, suggesting a lack of encouragement in researches for the development of inventions involving Lippia species. Moreover, the scientific production in Brazil is recent (last 100 years), and is concentrated in public universities and research centers, and in honorable exceptions, in private institutions, as a result of the Brazilian public policies in Science and Education [63]. Certainly, this is the capital challenge in the Brazilian national innovation system for the transfer of technology generated in universities and research centers to industry, in a way that new processes and products may be generated from these institutions.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Countries with patents about Lippia species (Vantage Point 7.1). WIPO = World Intellectual Property Organization; EPO = European Organization; USA = United States of America

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Number of patents about genus Lippia depositated from 1987 (Vantage Point 7.1)

The growing interest in plant products with different purposes is linked, in part, to the low cost of drug production based on active principles isolated from natural products when compared to investments for synthesis in the laboratory [64]. In the context of the herbal market evolution, estimated at US$ 22 billion and corresponding to 3.7% of the global market, this growth accompanies the pharmaceutical industry, considered one of the most lucrative in the world. Brazil is considered the seventh largest market, and from 2006 to 2010 grew by 14%. In 2015, Brazil will be the sixth largest market in this sector [65]. Hence, Brazilian pharmaceutical and bio prospecting areas require constant and high investments in research and development of new products, since the natural resources have money-making value, attract investors and catch the attention to the preservation of endemic species.

CONCLUSION

Lippia species are a source of remarkable bioactive substances (such as EOs) with economic potential for local communities. Specifically, L. microphylla is an endemic underexploited Brazilian vegetal with great medicinal properties that has gained much attention in the general population and scientific community. Then, this bio prospection helps to build perspectives of the bioactivity areas of real interest for capital investment and to give support for Brazilian institutions to establish cooperation and partnerships in order to change the scientific reality, where basic and applied researches in pharmaceutical sectors are ineffective and without technological impact to create and innovate.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We wish to thank Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Piauí (FAPEPI) for financial support in the form of grants and fellowship award.

Footnotes

Source of Support: Nil

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

  • 1.Geneva: WHO; 2011. World Health Organization. The World medicines situation 2011 Traditional medicines: Global situation, issues and challenges; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Butler MS. The role of natural product chemistry in drug discovery. J Nat Prod. 2004;67:2141–53. doi: 10.1021/np040106y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ferreira PM, Farias DF, Viana MP, Souza TM, Vasconcelos IM, Soares BM, et al. Study of the antiproliferative potential of seed extracts from Northeastern Brazilian plants. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2011;83:1045–58. doi: 10.1590/s0001-37652011005000017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Araújo EJF, Araújo DYML, Freitas RM, Ferreira PMP. Toxicology of the medicinal plant Casearia sylvestris Swartz: A literature review. Rev Cienc Farm Basica Apl. 2014;35:355–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Militão GC, Dantas IN, Ferreira PM, Alves AP, Chaves DC, Monte FJ, et al. In vitro and in vivo anticancer properties of cucurbitacin isolated from Cayaponia racemosa. Pharm Biol. 2012;50:1479–87. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2012.684691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Carvalho CC, Micheletti AC, Ferreira PM, Pessoa C, Fonseca TH, Gomes MA, et al. Biological screening of extracts of Brazilian Asteraceae plants. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol. 2013;7:2000–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Terblanché FC, Kornelius G. Essential oil constituents of the genus Lippia (Verbenaceae) –A literature review. J Essent Oil Res. 1996;8:471–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Santos JS, Melo JIM, Abreu MC, Sales MF. Verbenaceae sensu stricto in the region of Xingó: Alagoas e Sergipe, Brazil. Rodriguésia. 2009;40:985–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Agra MF, Baracho GS, Nurit K, Basílio IJ, Coelho VP. Medicinal and poisonous diversity of the flora of “Cariri Paraibano”, Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;111:383–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2006.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Santos JP, Araújo EL, Albuquerque UP. Richness and distribution of useful woody plants in the semi-arid region of Northeastern Brazil. J Arid Environ. 2008;72:652–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lorenzi H, Matos FJA. Medicinal Plants in Brazil: Natives e Exotics. Nova Odessa. 2002:1–512. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pham Huu Chanh, Koffi Y, Pham Huu Chanh A. Comparative hypotensive effects of compounds extracted from Lippia multiflora leaves. Planta Med. 1988;54:294–6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-962436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Souto-Bachiller FA, Jesus-Echevarria M, Cárdenas-Gonzalez OE, Acuña-Rodriguez MF, Meléndedez RA, Romero-Ramsey L. Terpenoid composition of Lippia dulcis. Phytochemistry. 1997;44:1077–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pascual ME, Slowing K, Carretero E, Sánchez Mata D, Villar A. Lippia: Traditional uses, chemistry and pharmacology: A review. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001;76:201–14. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(01)00234-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Matos FJA, Oliveira F. Lippia sidoides Cham. Pharmacognosy, chemistry and pharmacology. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 1998;79:84–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abad MJ, Bermejo P, Villar A, Palomino SS, Carraso L. Antiviral activity of medicinal plant extracts. Phytother Res. 1997;11:198–202. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Valentin A, Pélissier Y, Benoit F, Marion C, Kone D, Mallie M, et al. Composition and antimalarial activity in vitro of volatile components of Lippia multiflora. Phytochemistry. 1995;40:1439–42. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(95)00522-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Forestieri AM, Monforte MT, Ragusa S, Trovato A. Antiinflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic activity in rodents of plant extracts used in African medicine. Phytother Re. 1996;10:100–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lemos TL, Matos FJ, Alencar JW, Craveiro AA. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils of Brazilian plants. Phytother Res. 1990;4:82–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Souza EL, Lima EO, Freire KR, Sousa CP. Inhibitory action of some essential oils and phytochemicals on the growth of various moulds isolated from foods. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2005;48:245–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Botelho MA, Nogueira NAP, Bastos GM, Fonseca SGC, Lemos TLG, Matos FJA, et al. The antimicrobial The antimicrobial activity of essential oil of Lippia sidoides, carvacrol and thymol against oral pathogens. Braz J Med. 2007;40:349–56. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2007000300010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Oliveira DR, Leitao GG, Bizzo HR, Lopes D, Alviano DS, Leitão SG. Chemical and antimicrobial analyses of the essential oil of Lippia origanoides H.B.K. Food Chem 2007. 2007;101:236–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Silva VA, Freitas AFR, Pereira MSV, Siqueira JP, Júnior, Pereira AV, Higino JS. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of Lippia sidoides Cham extract on biological isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Rev Bras Plantas Med. 2010;12:452–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Funari CS, Gullo FP, Napolitano A, Carneiro RL, Mendes-Giannini MJ, Fusco-Almeida AM, et al. Chemical and antifungal investigations of six Lippia species (Verbenaceae) from Brazil. Food Chem. 2012;135:2086–94. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.06.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Veras HN, Rodrigues FF, Colares AV, Menezes IR, Coutinho HD, Botelho MA, et al. Synergistic antibiotic activity of volatile compounds from the essential oil of Lippia sidoides and thymol. Fitoterapia. 2012;83:508–12. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2011.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.de Lima GP, de Souza TM, de Paula Freire G, Farias DF, Cunha AP, Ricardo NM, et al. Further insecticidal activities of essential oils from Lippia sidoides and Croton species against Aedes aegypti L. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:1953–8. doi: 10.1007/s00436-013-3351-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Abena AA, Ngondzo-Kombeti GR, Bioka D. Psychopharmacologic properties of Lippia multiflora. Encephale. 1998;24:449–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Costa SM, Lemos TL, Pessoa OD, Pessoa C, Montenegro RC, Braz-Filho R. Chemical constituents from Lippia sidoides and cytotoxic activity. J Nat Prod. 2001;64:792–5. doi: 10.1021/np0005917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mesa-Arango AC, Montiel-Ramos J, Zapata B, Durán C, Betancur-Galvis L, Stashenko E. Citral and carvone chemotypes from the essential oils of Colombian Lippia alba (Mill.) N.E. Brown: Composition, cytotoxicity and antifungal activity. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104:878–84. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762009000600010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gonzalez-Guëreca MC, Soto-Hernandez M, Martinez-Vazquez M. Isolation of (-)(2S)-5,6,7,3',5'-pentahydroxyflavanone-7-O-ß-D-glucopyranoside, from Lippia graveolens H.B.K. var. berlandieri Schauer, a new anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic flavanone. Nat Prod Res. 2010;24:1528–36. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2010.488234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Compadre CM, Robbins EF, Kinghorn AD. The intensely sweet herb Lippia dulcis Trev: Historical uses, field inquiries, and constituents. J Ethnopharmacol. 1986;15:89–106. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(86)90105-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kaneda N, Lee IS, Gupta MP, Soejarto DD, Kinghorn AD. (+) v-4 beta-hydroxyhernandulcin, a new sweet sesquiterpene from the leaves and flowers of Lippia dulcis. J Nat Prod. 1992;55:1136–41. doi: 10.1021/np50086a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Santos HS, Silveira ER, Costa SM, Lemos TL, Pessoa OD, Uchoa DE. 1H and 13C NMR application to structure elucidations of prenylated naphthoquinone dimers from Lippia microphylla. An Ressonância Magn Nucl. 2002;1:32–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Santos HS, Costa SM, Pessoa OD, Moraes MO, Pessoa C, Fortier S, et al. Cytotoxic naphthoquinones from roots of Lippia microphylla. Z Naturforsch C. 2003;58:517–20. doi: 10.1515/znc-2003-7-812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.López-Alarcón C, Denicola A. Evaluating the antioxidant capacity of natural products: A review on chemical and cellular-based assays. Anal Chim Acta. 2013;763:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2012.11.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Farias DF, Souza TM, Viana MP, Soares BM, Cunha AP, Vasconcelos IM, et al. Antibacterial, antioxidant, and anticholinesterase activities of plant seed extracts from Brazilian semiarid region. Biomed Res Int 2013. 2013:510736. doi: 10.1155/2013/510736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Carvalho AF, Melo VM, Craveiro AA, Machado MI, Bantim MB, Rabelo EF. Larvicidal activity of the essential oil from Lippia sidoides Cham. Against Aedes aegypti linn. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2003;98:569–71. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762003000400027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cavalcanti ES, Morais SM, Lima MA, Santana EW. Larvicidal activity of essential oils from Brazilian plants against Aedes aegypti L. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2004;99:541–4. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762004000500015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Santiago GM, Lemos TL, Pessoa OD, Arriaga AM, Matos FJ, Lima MA, et al. Larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae) essential oils of Lippia species from Brazil. Nat Prod Commun. 2006;1:573–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Folashade KO, Omoregie EH. Essential oil of Lippia multiflora Moldenke: A review. J App Pharm Sci. 2012;2:15–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gleiser RM, Bonino MA, Zygadlo JA. Repellence of essential oils of aromatic plants growing in Argentina against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Parasitol Res. 2011;108:69–78. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-2042-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Washington: EPA; 1994. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) facts: Limonene EPA-738-F-94-030; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hebeish A, Fouda MM, Hamdy IA, El-Sawy SM, Abdel-Mohdy FA. Preparation of durable insect repellent cotton fabric: Limonene as insecticide. Carbohydr Polym. 2008;74:268–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Costa SM, Santos HS, Lemos TL, Pessoa OD. Constituents of the essential oil of Lippia microphylla Cham. from Northeast of Brazil. J Essent Oil Res. 2005;17:378–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rodrigues FF, Henrique DM, Campos AR, Sidney GL, Costa JG. Antibacterial activity and chemical composition of essential oil of Lippia microphylla Cham. Acta Sci Bio Sci. 2011;33:141–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Schurt DA, Trassato LB, Souza GR, Silva WL. Use of essential oil of Lippia microphylla on in vitro growth inhibition of Rhizoctonia solani. Trop Plant Pathol. 2012;38:34–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cowan MM. Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12:564–82. doi: 10.1128/cmr.12.4.564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lakusici B, Ristic M, Slavkovski V, Stankovic JA, Milenkovic M. Chemical composition and antimicrobial of the essential oil from Satureja horvatii Silic (Lamiaceae) J Serb Chem Soc. 2008;73:703–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.David JP, Meira M, David JM, Brandão HN, Branco A, de Fátima Agra M, et al. Radical scavenging, antioxidant and cytotoxic activity of Brazilian Caatinga plants. Fitoterapia. 2007;78:215–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2006.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Silva PS, Viccini LF, Singulani JL, Siqueira EP, Zani CL, Alves TM. Chemical composition of the essential oil and hexanic fraction of Lippia and Lantana species. Rev Bras Farmacognosia. 2010;20:843–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65:55–63. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Xavier AL. Study of the potential antitumor the essential oil of Lippia microphylla leaves call (Verbenaceae) and its toxicity. Post-graduate Program in Natural Products and Synthetic Bioactives. João Pessoa: UFPB. 2011:1–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wu YJ, Muldoon LL, Neuwelt EA. The chemoprotective agent N-acetylcysteine blocks cisplatin-induced apoptosis through caspase signaling pathway. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005;312:424–31. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.075119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hengartner MO. The biochemistry of apoptosis. Nature. 2000;407:770–6. doi: 10.1038/35037710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cao DX, Qiao B, Ge ZQ, Yuan YJ. Comparison of burst of reactive oxygen species and activation of caspase-3 in apoptosis of K562 and HL-60 cells induced by docetaxel. Cancer Lett. 2004;214:103–13. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.03.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Meshkini A, Yazdanparast R. Involvement of oxidative stress in taxol-induced apoptosis in chronic myelogenous leukemia K562 cells. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2012;64:357–65. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2010.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Santos MDM, Coelho GM, Santos DMD, Filho LF. Prospecting of Future Technologies: Methods, Techniques and Approaches. Brasília: CGEE. 2004:198–229. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Marques LG, Simões ER, Ferreira PM, Santos MR, Pessoa C. Development of the technological potential of Casearia sylvestris. Rev Geintec. 2013;3:70–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zackiewicz M, Salles-Filho S. Technological foresight: A tool for science and technology policy. Parcerias Estratégicas. 2001;10:144–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Brasil Ministry of Health. Secretariat of Science, Technology and Strategic Inputs. Department of Pharmaceutical Services. National Policy of Medicinal Plants and Herbal Medicines. Brasília: Série B - Textos Básicos de Saúde. 2006:1–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Brasil Presidency, Civil House, deputy chef for Legal Affairs. Law No 10,973/2004. [Access date 21.02.2015]. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil03/ato2004-2006/2004/lei/l10.973.htm. > .
  • 63.Speziali MG, Guimarães PPG, Sinisterra RD. Demystifying patent protection in universities. Quim Nova. 2012;35:1700–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Klein T, Longhini R, Bruschi ML, Mello JCP. Herbal Medicines: A Promising Market. Rev Ciênc Farm Básica Apl. 2009;30:241–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Institute for Healthcare Informatics. The Global use of medicines: Outlook trough 2015. 2011. [Last accessed on 2014 Jul 07]. Available from: http://www.imshealth.com/deployedfiles/ims//Insights/IMS%20Institute20for%20Healthcare%20Informatics/Global_Use_of_Medicines_Report.pdf .

Articles from Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology are provided here courtesy of SAGEYA

RESOURCES