Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1250:53–76. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2074-7_4

Immortalized human hepatic cell lines for in vitro testing and research purposes

Eva Ramboer 1, Tamara Vanhaecke 1, Vera Rogiers 1, Mathieu Vinken 1
PMCID: PMC4579543  EMSID: EMS64935  PMID: 26272134

Summary

The ubiquitous shortage of primary human hepatocytes has urged the scientific community to search for alternative cell sources, such as immortalized hepatic cell lines. Over the years, several human hepatic cell lines have been produced, whether or not using a combination of viral oncogenes and human telomerase reverse transcriptase protein. Conditional approaches for hepatocyte immortalization have also been established and allow generation of growth-controlled cell lines. A variety of immortalized human hepatocytes have already proven useful as tools for liver-based in vitro testing and fundamental research purposes. The present chapter describes currently applied immortalization strategies and provides an overview of the actually available immortalized human hepatic cell lines and their in vitro applications.

Keywords: cell line, liver, immortalization, human

1. Introduction

At present, primary human hepatocytes represent an important tool for research purposes, in particular in the field of in vitro pharmaco-toxicology (1). However, their use is largely impeded by inadequate supply, high cost, high variability and limited in vitro proliferation capacity. Alternative cell sources include hepatic cell lines and stem-cell derived hepatocytes (2, 3, 4). Several hepatic cell lines are nowadays available either directly derived from liver tumor tissue or generated from primary hepatocytes in vitro (5, 6). Although several hepatoma-derived cell lines, such as HepaRG cells, preserve important liver-specific functions, most of them do not exhibit sufficient in vivo-like functionality to be of pharmaco-toxicological relevance (7-12). Immortalized hepatocytes are usually derived from healthy primary hepatocytes by the use of a defined immortalization strategy. Several fetal and adult hepatic cell lines have already been established, whether or not using a combination of viral oncogenes and the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) protein (13-19). In this chapter, a number of immortalization strategies are discussed and a state-of-the-art overview of the currently available immortalized human hepatic cell lines and their in vitro applications is provided.

2. Hepatocyte immortalization strategies

The most common methods for immortalization of primary hepatocytes are (i) overexpression of viral oncogenes, (ii) forced expression of hTERT or (iii) a combination of both (Table 1) (14, 20). A number of additional immortalization genes as well as conditional approaches for hepatocyte immortalization have also been described (Table 2).

Table 1. Overview of immortalization strategies, hepatic functionality and in vitro applications of human adult and fetal hepatic cell lines.

(A1AT, α1-antitrypsin; AFP, α-fetoprotein; AhR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; ALB, albumin; A2M, α2-macroglobulin; APO, apolipoprotein; Arnt, AhR nuclear translocator; ASGP(R), asialoglycoprotein (receptor); BCRP, breast cancer resistance protein; BSEP, bile salt export pump; CAR, constitutive androstane receptor; C/EBP, Ccaat-enhancer-binding protein; ChREBP, carbohydrate-responsive element-binding protein; CK, cytokeratin; CLDN, claudin; CYP, cytochrome P450; EH, epoxide hydrolase; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; EPCAM, epithelial cell adhesion molecule; FXR, farnesoid X receptor; GGT, γ-glutamyltranspeptidase; G6P, glucose-6-phosphate; GPX, gluthatione peroxidase; GS, glutamine synthetase; GST, gluthatione S-transferase; HBCF, human blood coagulation factor; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HGFR, hepatocyte growth factor receptor; HNF, hepatocyte nuclear factor; HPV, human papillomavirus; hTERT, human telomerase reverse transcriptase; IL, interleukin; IFN, interferon; MDR, multidrug resistance protein; mRNA, messenger ribonucleic acid; MRP, multidrug resistance-associated protein; NADPH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; NCAM, neural cell adhesion molecule; NTCP, sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide; OATP, organic anion transporting polypeptide; OCT, organic cation transporter; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; PXR, pregnane X receptor; Rb, retinoblastoma; RIPK4, receptor-interacting serine-threonine kinase 4; SOD, superoxide dismutase; SREBP, sterol regulatory element-binding protein; SV40 Tag, simian virus 40 large T antigen; TGF, transforming growth factor; TF, transferrin; (bil-)UGT, (bilirubin-)uridinediphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase).

Adult hepatic cell line
Cell line Immortalization strategy Hepatic functionality of immortalized cells In vitro applications Reference
Fa2N-4 Transfection
  • -
    Possess, in comparison with cryopreserved human hepatocytes:
    • Significantly lower basal expression level of the nuclear receptor CAR and several drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters, namely CYP1A2/2D6/2E1/1A1, UGT1A1/1A6/2B15/2B4, sulfotransferase, NTCP, OCT1, OATP1B1/1B3, MRP2 and BSEP.
    • Markedly higher MDR1 mRNA levels.
    • Similar basal expression of BCRP, PXR and AhR.
    • Apparently higher expression of most transcription factors and coactivators/corepressors that have been associated with PXR and CAR mediated enzyme induction.
  • -

    Are incapable of metabolizing compounds due to low basal levels of drug-metabolizing enzymes.

  • -

    Exhibit, at early passage, inducible CYP1A2/2C9/3A4, UGT1A and MDR1 mRNA levels as well as CYP1A2/2C9/3A4 activities and could distinguish inducers from non-inducers. At higher passages, the cells lose the ability to induce.

Routine screening system for PXR-mediated CYP3A4 induction. (18,92,97)
SV40 Tag
HepLi5 Retroviral vector
  • -

    Express HBCF-X, GS, GST, ALB and CYP450 mRNA.

  • -

    Retain ALB secretion and urea production, though at low levels compared to primary hepatocytes.

  • -

    Display CYP1A2 activity.

  • -

    Possess significantly enhanced cellular functions after large-scale culture in roller bottles.

(21)
SV40 Tag
HepLL Lipid mediated gene transfer (lipofectamine reagent)
  • -

    Display morphologic characteristics of liver parenchymal cells.

  • -

    Express HNF4, HBCF-X, GST-Π and ALB mRNA as well as ALB and CYP2E1 protein but no ASGP mRNA.

  • -

    Stain positive for human hepatocyte special antigen but negative for AFP.

  • -

    Secrete ALB and urea at levels not significantly different from primary cultured human hepatocytes.

  • -

    Synthesize glycogen.

Testing of new drug carriers for anti-HBV drug delivery. (22, 98)
SV40 Tag
HepZ Lipid mediated gene transfer (lipofectamine reagent)
  • -

    When grown in bioreactor, cells are able to secrete ALB and A2M and possess inducible CYP450 activity.

(47)
Antisense constructions for Rb and p53 under control of ALB promoter + Cotransfection of E2F transcription factors and cyclin D1
HHE6E7T-1/2 Small hepatocytes
  • -

    Display epithelial-like morphology.

  • -

    Retain characteristics of differentiated hepatocytes, though functions such as ALB secretion as well as mRNA expression levels of ALB, HNF4 and A1AT decrease gradually as the passages progress. CK18 mRNA levels are detected throughout the culture period and no AFP expression is observed.

  • -

    Are positive for vimentin staining.

(16, 99)
Lentiviral and retroviral vectors
HPV16 E6/E7 + hTERT
HHL(-5/-7/-16) Retroviral vector
  • -

    Contain markers of hepatocyte and biliary phenotype (CK7/8/18/19).

  • -

    Express CYP450 protein at levels comparable to Huh-7 and HepG2 cells.

  • -

    Produce ALB, though at lower levels than Huh-7 and HepG2 cells.

  • -

    Stain negative for AFP and do not display elevated nuclear expression of p53 protein.

  • -

    Possess active gap junctions.

  • -

    Respond to INF-α stimulation by upregulation of major histocompatibility complex I and II

  • -

    Exhibit, in contrast to the Huh-7 and HepG2 cells, increased capacity to bind recombinant hepatitis C virus-like particles.

Used as a cell model to investigate:
  • -

    Ability of CD8+ T-cells to recognise and kill hepatocytes under cytokine stimulation.

  • -

    Role of sirtuin 4 in energy homeostasis.

  • -

    Effect of THCV on insulin signalling in insulin-resistant human hepatoctyes.

  • -

    Gene expression and antigen presentation after adeno-associated viral transduction and effect of proteasome inhibition or capsid mutation.

(15, 89-91, 100-102)
HPV16 E6/E7
IHH-A5 Lipid mediated gene transfer (lipofectin reagent)
  • -

    Are morphologically and functionally more similar to hepatoma cell lines than primary hepatocytes in culture.

  • -

    Secrete different plasma proteins, including ALB, APO-B and fibrinogen at relatively high rates, within the range observed for early primary human hepatocyte cultures. Addition of IL-6 to the culture medium results in increased fibrinogen secretion and decreased ALB production, demonstrating a proper acute-phase response.

  • -

    Produce detectable amounts of APO-A1.

  • -

    Exhibit bile-canalicular structures that, in some cases, accumulated the organic anion glutathione-methylfluorescein. Cell cultures are partly polarized and express the efflux transporters, MDR1 and MRP1, on the membranes of apical vacuoles or on the lateral membranes of adjacent, proliferating cells, respectively.

  • -

    Do not maintain active Na+ -dependent bile salt uptake.

  • -

    Display similar lipoprotein metabolism as HepG2 cells.

Used a cell model to investigate:
  • -

    Molecular mechanisms underlying FXR regulation of ChREBP transcriptional activity in human hepatocytes.

  • -

    Effect of antipsychotic drugs on SREBP transcription factor pathways which control.

  • -

    Role of c-fos expression on hepatocyte cell motility and cell cycle regulation.

  • -

    Effect of cadmium on nonmalignant human hepatocytes.

(23, 85, 86, 103-105)
SV40 Tag
PH5CH Lipid mediated gene transfer (lipofectin reagent)
  • -

    Display epithelial appearance.

  • -

    Express human CK and ALB protein.

Used a cell model to investigate:
  • -

    HCV infection, replication and tropism.

  • -

    HCC-selective cytotoxicity of HBF-0079.

  • -

    MicroRNA expression in TGF-β-induced hepatocyte EMT.

  • -

    Effect of hepatitis B virus proteins on signalling mediated by members of the Toll-like/interleukin 1 superfamily.

  • -

    Effect of HBV polymerase on IFN production in human hepatocytes.

(25, 74, 75, 81, 106-113)
SV40 Tag
THLE Retroviral vector
  • -

    Display epithelial morphology.

  • -

    Secrete ALB and express CK18, TF, A1AT, A2M, GST-Π and very low levels of GGT at early passages. CK19 expression can only be determined at later passages. Cells are uniformly negative for AFP and factor VIII. The appearance of CK19 and decreased ALB secretion at later passages demonstrate that cells undergo dedifferentiation in culture.

  • -

    Retain mRNA expression of phase II enzymes such as EH, catalase, GPX, SOD and GSTs at levels comparable to human liver, with GST-Π and a mRNA as the dominant form in THLE cells or human liver, respectively.

  • -

    Maintain NADPH CYP reductase expression at a lower steady-state mRNA level than in human liver.

  • -

    Are able to metabolize three carcinogens, which suggests the presence and activity of CYP1A2/1A1, CYP2E1 and CYP3A4. However CYP1A2, CYP2E1, CYP3A4, CYP2A3 and CYP2D6 mRNA are not detected. The steady-state mRNA levels of CYP1A1 increase after exposure to Aroclor 1254 or B[α] P.



  • Overexpression of specific CYP450 gene led to the development of THLE-CYP sublines.

THLE and THLE-CYP cells can be used to study cellular toxicity of compounds.
Used a cell model to investigate:
  • -

    HCC-selective cytotoxicity of HBF-0079.

  • -

    Hepatoprotective and chemopreventive properties of phytochemicals.

(25, 93, 94, 111, 114-124)
SV40 Tag
TPH1 Strontium phosphate precipitation
  • -

    Exhibit altered cell morphology resembling low-differentiated epithelial cells.

  • -

    Express no A1AT or AFP mRNA.

  • -

    Secrete ALB.

  • -

    Possess G6P activity.

  • -

    Reactivate telomerase immediately after senescence.

Used a cell model to investigate HCV infection and replication.

Induces apoptosis of activated hepatic stellate cells.
(45, 77, 78, 125-129)
HCV core gene
Fetal and neonatal hepatic cell lines
Cell line Immortalization strategy Hepatic functionality of immortalized cells In vitro applications Ref
FH-TERT Retroviral vector
  • -

    Express CYP450 mRNA and maintain, in contrast to passaged fetal hepatocytes, liver-enriched differentiation markers, especially C/EBPα and HNF4 as well as elevated levels of HGFR.

  • -

    Possess glycogen storage and G6P activity, in a pattern similar to primary fetal hepatocytes.

  • -

    Produce urea and retain level of ALB synthesis equivalent to HepG2 cells.



  • Culture conditions used in these studies were designed at supporting cell proliferation; conditions have not been optimized for inducing differentiated hepatocellular functions.

Used as a stroma to induce human embryonic stem cellsdifferentiation into hematopoietic cells.

Used as a cell model to investigate:
  • -

    Role of RIPK4 as novel tumor suppressor in human hepatocarcinogenesis.

  • -

    Permissive role of β-catenin signalling in the initial phase of hepatocarcinogenesis.

(34, 83, 84, 130)
hTERT
Hc3716-hTERT Retroviral vector
  • -

    Maintain normal mammalian cell morphology.

  • -

    Exhibit protein expression of ALB, CK8 and CK18, but not AFP. ALB levels are higher than in control, passaged Hc3716 cells.

  • -

    Possess inducible CYP3A4/7 mRNA levels.

  • -

    Exhibit wild-type p53 responsiveness.

Used as in vitro model for predicting the side-effects of telomere-targeting drugs. (39)
hTERT
NeHepLxHT Retroviral vector
  • -

    Display characteristic morphology of primary fetal liver cells.

  • -

    Maintain epithelial characteristics as evidenced by immunostaining for epithelial cell markers, the cytokeratins.

  • -

    Possess gene expression profile similar to human neonatal hepatocytes, with positive expression of A1AT, CKIT, CLDN3, EPCAM, NCAM mRNA and no detection of AFP, ASGPR or CYP3A4. The very low ALB mRNA levels compared to HepG2 cells and the expression of CK19 in early passages indicate the progenitor nature of the cells.

Used as a cell model to investigate:
  • -

    Role of FAT10 in promoting malignant cell transformation.

  • -

    Molecular mechanism responsible for miR-224 overexpression in HCC.

  • -

    Role of HCV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase in promoting liver inflammation and injury.

(14, 80, 131, 132)
hTERT
OUMS-29 Lipid mediated gene transfer (lipofectin reagent)
  • -

    Display epithelial morphology.

  • -

    Maintain gene expression of ALB, ASGPR, bil-UGT, GS, GST-Π, HBCF-X, AhR and Amt.

  • -

    Secrete ALB, AFP, TF, A1AT and APO A-1.

  • -

    Possess inducible CYP1A1/2 mRNA levels and activity.



  • Overexpression of HNF4α2 led to development of OUMS-29/H-11 cell line with increased liver-specific gene expression, such as A1AT, apolipoproteins, HBCF-X and HNF1α.

Used as a cell model to investigate:
  • -

    Role T-cell factor 4 isoforms in promoting hepatic tumorigenicity.

  • -

    Effect of bile acid species on hepatocyte apoptosis induced by PPARgamma ligands.

  • -

    Effect of hydrogen peroxide on hepatic pigment epithelium-derived factor levels.

  • -

    Both morphologic and functional alterations in the mitochondria oftroglitazone-treated hepatocytes.

(17, 49, 62, 133-136)
SV40 Tag

Table 2. Overview of conditional immortalization strategies, hepatic functionality and in vitro applications of growth-controlled human adult and fetal hepatic cell lines.

(A1AT, α1-antitrypsin; AFP, α-fetoprotein; ALB, albumin; ASGP(R), asialoglycoprotein (receptor); Bmi-1, B lymphoma Mo-MLV insertion region 1 homolog; C/EBP, Ccaat-enhancer-binding protein; CD, cluster of differentiation; CK, cytokeratin; CYP, cytochrome P450; GS, glutamine synthetase; GST, gluthatione S-transferase; HBCF, human blood coagulation factor; HNF, hepatocyte nuclear factor; hTERT, human telomerase reverse transcriptase; mRNA, messenger ribonucleic acid; PT, prothrombin; SV40 Tag, simian virus 40 large T antigen; TF, transferrin; (bil-)UGT, (bilirubin-)uridinediphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase).

Adult hepatic cell line
Cell line Immortalization strategy Hepatic functionality of conditional immortalized cells In vitro applications Reference
16T-3 Retroviral vector Reverted 16T-3 cells:
  • -

    Show enhanced mRNA levels of transcriptional factors, C/EBPα and HNF4α as well as increased mRNA expression of hepatocyte-specific genes, including ALB, GST-Π, HBCF-X, bil-UGT, CYP3A4, GS and ASGPR.

  • -

    Possess increased ALB production and lidocaine metabolism, though at lower levels than normal human hepatocytes.

(43)
hTERT
Tamoxifen-mediated self-excision (Cre-LoxP)
HepLi-4 Retroviral vector Reverted HepLi-4 cells:
  • -

    Express similar GS and somewhat lower UGT1A1 mRNA levels than adult human liver. ALB and GST-Π mRNA levels are extremely lower or higher, respectively, compared to the human liver. This indicates that HepLi-4 cells are not fully differentiated after reversion.

(26)
SV40 Tag
Tamoxifen-mediated self-excision (Cre-LoxP)
HLTC-7/ -11/ -15/ -17/ -19 Retroviral vector
  • -

    Grow as islands or sheets of cuboidal cells (HLTC-17) or display a more dispersed cuboidal-elongated morphology (HLTC-7/-11/-15/-19).

  • -

    Secrete fibrinogen at fairly constant rate in all tested cell lines at permissive (33,5°C) and non-permissive (39,5°C) temperature.

  • -

    Exhibit no ALB, AFP, A1AGP or secretion in any cell line at both temperatures.

  • -

    Cell lines HLTC-7,-15 and -19, produce A1AT at permissive temperature. However, at non-permissive temperature the secretion of A1AT is upregulated or become detectable in all the cell lines.

  • -

    Cell lines HLTC-17 and -11 possess no CYP activity at any temperature even after induction and stain positive for ALB, CK18, CK7, CK19 and vimentin, but negative for CK8, with almost identical patterns at both temperatures.



  • The results indicate progressive phenotypic instability and loss of differentiated functions. Conversion to the non-permissive temperature does only allow significant expression of a limited repertoire of differentiated functions by the immortalized human hepatocytes.

(28)
SV40 Tag
Temperature-based regulation
IHH10(.3)/12 Lentiviral vector
  • -

    Display morphology reminiscent of differentiated hepatocytes.

  • -

    Express ALB, A1AT, ASGPR and CYP450 mRNA levels.

  • -

    Secrete liver-specific proteins, ALB and fibrinogen, at levels similar to Huh-7 cells but lower than primary hepatocytes. The IHH12 cell line do only produce fibrinogen after de-immortalization, suggesting the acquirement of a higher differentiation status in this setting. However, Cre-recombinase treatment of IHH12 cells does not significantly improve the production of ALB.

  • -

    Possess inducible CYP1A1/2 activity.

A novel in vitro model to investigate the mechanisms and consequences of lipid accumulation in hepatocytes, independently of insulin resistance. (19, 87)
SV40 Tag + hTERT (IHH10)
or
SV40 Tag + hTERT + Bmi-1 (IHH12)
Recombinase- based control (Cre-LoxP)
NKNT-3 Retroviral vector
  • -

    Display morphological characteristics of liver parenchymal cells and look more differentiated after reversion.

  • -

    Express bil-UGT, GS and GST-Π mRNA levels, which increased substantially after reversion. Contradicting results are published regarding expression of ALB and HBCF-X mRNA levels. One paper demonstrates that ALB and HBCF-X mRNA are newly introduced in the reverted cells whereas several other papers already report expression of these genes and ASGPR mRNA in non-reverted cells. Nevertheless, although reversion does stimulate differentiation, mRNA levels of ALB, A1AT and TF were maximally 0.1% of primary human hepatocytes.



  • Additional experiments reveal that introduction of p21 into human immortalized hepatocytes can increase ALB expression and induce a differentiated morphology.

  • Co-cultivation with immortalized hepatic stellate cells increases urea synthesis and protein expression of CYP3A4/2C9.

Used in combination with HCV like particles as a model system for studying viral binding and entry. (6, 29,52, 71, 79)
SV40 Tag
Recombinase- based control (Cre-loxP)
YOCK-13 Retroviral vector
  • -

    Display morphological characteristics of normal human hepatocytes.

  • -

    Express markers of hepatocytic differentiation including ALB, ASGPR, bil-UGT, CYP3A4, GS, GST-Π, and HBCF-X.



  • The YOCK-13 hepaticcell line is derived from the reversible immortalized human hepatic cell line, TTNT-16-3, by co-expression of modified insulin.

(42)
hTERT
Tamoxifen-mediated self-excision (Cre-LoxP)
Fetal hepatic cell lines
Cell line Immortalization strategy Hepatic functionality of conditional immortalized cells In vitro applications Reference
cBAL111 Lentiviral vector
  • -

    Express relatively high mRNA levels of immature markers, GST-Π and AFP, and very low mRNA levels of mature markers, ALB, A1AT and TF. Transcript levels of HNF4α increase after prolonged culturing.

  • -

    Stain positive for GS, ALB, CK18, CK19, vimentin and the progenitor cell marker CD146 but display CK18 in a pattern characteristic of dedifferentiated human hepatocytes.

  • -

    Produce urea and ALB, though at lower levels than mature human hepatocytes.

  • -

    Retain no CYP1A2 and 3A4 activity (no elimination of lidocaine) but are able to eliminate galactose.



  • cBAL111cells resemble cells with progenitor characteristics rather than fully differentiated hepatocytes. However, there is a trend of increased and decreased expression of mature and immature markers, respectively, with culture time.

(13)
hTERT
Transcriptional regulation (Tet-on approach)
HepCL Retroviral vector
  • -

    Display morphological characteristics of liver parenchymal cells.

  • -

    Stain positive for ALB, CK18 and CK19.

  • -

    Produce amounts of ALB and urea comparable to those of unmodified primary human fetal hepatocytes.

(27)
SV40 Tag
Temperature-based regulation

2.1. Immortalization genes

2.1.1. Viral oncogenes

Several human hepatic cell lines have been generated using viral oncogenes, such as the simian virus 40 large T antigen (SV40 Tag) and the human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) E6/E7 genes, suggesting that overexpression of these viral oncogenes could be sufficient to surmount the premature in vitro growth arrest of cultured adult hepatocytes (15, 17, 18, 20-29). Indeed, in contrast to fetal hepatocytes, human adult hepatocytes do not undergo spontaneous cell growth in vitro and possess very limited proliferation capacity, even when cultivated in growth-promoting culture systems (6, 20, 30, 31). It has been proposed that this in vitro precocious growth arrest could be the result of a telomere-independent senescence mechanism, which possibly involves tumor suppressor proteins and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (32). Viral oncogenes typically promote cell cycling by inhibiting the p16/retinoblastoma protein (pRB) and p53 pathways (20, 33). However, while the use of viral oncogenes, such as SV40 Tag, is sufficient to produce immortalized rodent cells, overexpression of these oncogenes probably only extends lifespan in human cells. Human hepatocytes, like other somatic cells, do not possess telomerase activity and are subject to replicative senescence (20, 32, 34, 35). Consequently, immortalization per se requires telomerase reactivation either through mutations or by involving a second immortalizing gene. In particular, hTERT has been used for this purpose (16, 19, 20, 34, 36-38).

2.1.2. Human telomerase reverse transcriptase

The single use of hTERT for immortalization is limited to a number of human cell types, including fetal and neonatal hepatocytes (6, 13, 14, 34, 36, 39, 40). These immature cells are still able to proliferate in vitro and hence do not need cell cycle stimulation for immortalization (6, 13, 14, 34, 40, 41). However, fetal and neonatal human hepatocytes do not display indefinite growth potential due to telomere-dependent senescence. As a result, overexpression of hTERT is needed to immortalize these hepatocytes (13, 14, 34, 40). Contradicting results have been obtained when merely hTERT is used to immortalize mature hepatocytes (16, 42, 43). Since telomerase activity most likely does not allow adult hepatocytes to overcome the suggested telomere-independent growth arrest, overexpression of hTERT may not be adequate to stimulate the progression of adult hepatocytes through the cell cycle (5, 13, 20, 44).

2.1.3. Miscellaneous immortalization genes

The hepatitis C core protein has been described as a specific immortalization agent for mature human hepatocytes (36, 45, 46). A particular cell line was developed by co-transfecting human adult hepatocytes with p53 and pRB antisense constructs and plasmids that include E2F and cyclin D1 genes (47). Furthermore, specific combinations of immortalization genes, such as SV40 Tag with hTERT and B lymphoma Moloney Murine Leukemia virus (Mo-MLV) insertion region 1 homolog (Bmi-1), have also proven useful for the immortalization of mature human hepatocytes. Bmi-1 has a similar function as the HPV16E7 oncogene and its expression inactivates the p16/pRB pathway. However, the simultaneous transduction with Bmi-1 and hTERT, like for the combined HPV16E7/hTERT approach, appears to be insufficient to immortalize non-proliferating adult hepatocytes (16, 19).

2.2. Gene transfer

Appropriate gene transfer is of utmost importance for hepatocyte immortalization (37). In this regard, both viral and non-viral transfer methods have been used to generate immortalized hepatocyte-derived cell lines.

2.2.1. Plasmid transfection

Since the immortalization process will select cells that stably express the immortalization genes, simple transfection methods can be used (48). At present, various approaches are available for transfecting plasmids into primary hepatocytes (37, 48). The strontium phosphate precipitation method has been used to immortalize human hepatocytes (45). Although this method is cheap and allows robust transfection of primary hepatocytes with low toxicity, it is generally accompanied by limited gene transfer efficiency (37). Liposomes have also been explored as gene carriers for hepatocyte immortalization (17, 22, 23, 25, 47, 49). When properly optimized, lipid-mediated gene transfer strategies can achieve high gene transfer efficiencies compared to the previously mentioned phosphate-precipitation-based transfection approach (37). Furthermore, combination with hepatocyte-specific ligands allows more hepatocyte-specific transfections (48).

2.2.2. Viral transduction

Transduction with viral vectors is a frequently used strategy for gene transfer. Among the available viral vectors, retroviral and lentiviral vectors enable stable integration of the immortalization gene and thus ensure persistent transgene expression in the progeny (48, 50). Furthermore, these vectors do not induce harmful immune responses and are able to integrate large genes (51). Retroviral vectors have often been used to produce human hepatic cell lines (14-16, 21, 24, 26-28, 34, 39, 42, 43, 52). An important drawback of these vectors, however, is their inability to transduce non-dividing cells, which hampers their use for non-proliferating cells, including hepatocytes (51, 53). Although transduction efficiencies generally remain limited even when growth factors are used, it has been reported that the addition of hepatocyte growth factor to the cell culture medium increases the transduction efficiency in primary human hepatocyte cultures (48, 51, 53-55). Lentiviral vectors derived from the human immunodeficiency virus can overcome these flaws and effectively transduce both dividing and non-dividing cells when applied at a relatively high titer (51, 53, 54, 56). Several studies are based upon lentiviral gene transfer for immortalization of human adult and fetal hepatocytes (13, 16, 19). It has been demonstrated that the lentiviral transduction procedure as such does not interfere with the differentiated hepatic phenotype of primary human hepatocytes (57). Moreover, the addition of growth factors to the cell culture medium can markedly enhance the expression of lentiviral genes in both human adult and fetal hepatocytes when low vector titers are used. This transduction approach therefore offers the opportunity to lower the viral load, which in turn reduces cost and cellular toxicity (56). Also, the antioxidant vitamin E is known to promote lentiviral transduction rates of human adult hepatocytes (53).

2.2.3. Human artificial chromosomes

The successful immortalization of rat hepatocytes and human fibroblasts using human artificial chromosomes vectors expressing SV40 Tag or hTERT, respectively, opens new perspectives for human hepatocyte immortalization (58-60). Although the transfer efficiency is generally lower compared to viral vectors, human artificial chromosomes have many characteristics of an ideal gene delivery vector. Indeed, they are able to incorporate complete genomic loci and maintain a mitotically stable episomal expression throughout many cell divisions. Furthermore, due to their episomal nature, integration-related complications, such as oncogenesis, can be avoided (50).

2.3. Hepatic functionality of the immortalized human hepatocytes

In general, most human hepatic cell lines possess reduced or only limited liver-specific functionality. Strategies that are typically used to counteract the loss of functionality in primary hepatocyte cultures, including the establishment of co-culture systems or the overexpression of liver-enriched transcription factors, have also proven beneficial for immortalized human hepatocytes (61, 62). In this context, overexpression of specific cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes lies at the basis of the development of the THLE-CYP sublines (63). On the other hand, as differentiation and proliferation are mutually exclusive in vitro, overexpression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 and the use of conditional immortalization strategies were reported to boost to some extent the differentiated phenotype of hepatocytes (19, 29, 43, 64, 65).

2.4. Conditional immortalization strategies

Conditional immortalization supports controlled expansion of cells. At present, 3 different strategies are applied for human hepatocytes, namely (i) temperature-based regulation, (ii) recombinase-based regulation and (iii) transcriptional regulation (36) (Table 2 and 3).

Table 3. Conditional approaches for human hepatocyte immortalization (36).

(rtTA, reverse tetracycline transactivator; SV40 Tag, simian virus 40 large T antigen; TRE, tetracycline responsive element; tTA, tetracycline transactivator).

Conditional approach Immortalization construct Growth curve
Temperature-based regulation Thermolabile SV40 Tag mutant graphic file with name emss-64935-t0001.jpg
Recombinase-based control LoxP – immortalization gene(s) – LoxP
FRT – immortalization gene(s) – FRT
graphic file with name emss-64935-t0002.jpg
Transcriptional regulation TRE- immortalization gene(s) graphic file with name emss-64935-t0003.jpg

2.4.1. Temperature-based regulation

This method is based upon the application of a temperature-unstable SV40 Tag mutant. At permissive temperature (i.e. 33°C), the immortalizing gene is fully active and stimulates hepatocyte proliferation. However, at higher temperatures (i.e. 37 to 39°C), the immortalization gene is typically degraded and cell cycle progression is no longer supported (36). Since no other temperature-sensitive immortalizing genes have yet been identified, this method is restricted to the use of SV40 Tag (36). Importantly, the temperature shift related to this methodology might induce variations in cellular properties, which can complicate the interpretation of the study outcome (36, 66, 67). More sophisticated systems based upon recombinase or transcriptional regulation are believed to offer a better solution (68).

2.4.2. Recombinase-based control

The site-specific recombinase strategy results in an irreversible reversion of immortalization, due to permanent removal of immortalization genes (36, 69). The Cre-LoxP site-specific recombination system has often been used to establish reversible immortalization (69, 70). In this method, the immortalization genes are flanked by 2 identical DNA sequences, called LoxP sites, and their excision is regulated by Cre recombinase (20, 70). Hence, proper reversion relies on the effective transfer of the recombinase gene (36). A new method based on tamoxifen-mediated self-excision has been introduced and renders secondary virus-mediated transfer of the recombinase gene superfluous (26, 42, 43). Additionally, the incorporation of a negative selection marker, such as the suicide gene herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase, allows the removal of cells that underwent improper recombination by exposure to ganciclovir (19, 70). Reversible immortalization of numerous human hepatocyte-derived cell lines, including NKNT-3, IHH and 16T-3 cells, depends on this recombinase-based control approach (19, 42, 43, 71).

2.4.3. Transcriptional regulation

In this method, the reversibility of immortalization does not rely on recombinase activity, but is achieved through transcriptional control of immortalization gene expression. Consequently, repetitive cycles of hepatocyte proliferation and growth arrest are possible and the risk of chromosomal rearrangement is prevented (36, 68, 72). The transcriptional control of immortalizing genes can be accomplished by the use of an artificial promoter/transactivator system, such as the well-known tetracycline system (36). As such, 2 approaches are currently available, namely the tet-off and the tet-on system, which comprise a tetracycline-regulated promoter and a tetracycline transactivator (tTA) or reverse tetracycline transactivator (rtTA), respectively. In the tet-on system, binding of doxycycline to the transactivator will induce the expression of the regulated gene. This is not the case for the tet-off system, since only unbound tTA is able to interact with the gene promoter (72, 73). The tet-on approach has been used for the development of the human fetal liver cell line cBAL111 (13).

3. In vitro applications of immortalized human hepatocytes

In recent years, both adult and fetal human hepatic cell lines have been explored for research purposes (Table 1 and 2). Several immortalized human hepatocytes, including PH5CH, TPH1, NKNT-3 and NeHepLxHT cells, have indeed been successfully used as tools in research focused on hepatitis C virus or hepatitis B virus (HBV) (74-81). A murine model of HBV viremia based upon a human hepatocyte-derived cell line transfected with HBV DNA has been described and offers the opportunity for in vivo HBV research (82). Human hepatic cell lines have also been applied as cellular models to investigate the processes of hepatocarcinogenesis and steatosis (83-88). Moreover, the HHL cell line proved useful during the development of adeno-associated viral vectors for liver-directed gene therapy (89-91).

Besides their application in fundamental research, different hepatic cell lines are equally addressed as suitable in vitro tools for screening and safety testing of drug candidates. In this regard, Hc3716-hTERT immortalized hepatocytes constitute an appropriate in vitro model for predicting the side-effects of telomere-targeting drugs (39). Furthermore, Fa2N4 cells may be used as a routine screening system for pregnane X receptor-mediated CYP3A4 induction (92). Similarly, the hepatic THLE cell line and THLE-CYP sublines have been reported as promising models for investigation of CYP-mediated drug metabolism and liver toxicity (63, 93-95). However, NKNT-3 cells appeared to be less suitable than the hepatoma cell line HCC1.2 for the development of improved in vitro genotoxicity test systems (96).

4. Conclusion

In vitro expansion of human hepatocytes has gained considerable attention over the years, as it may serve a plethora of fundamental and applied research and screening purposes. Freshly isolated mature hepatocytes inherently have poor growth potential, a finding that has prompted the search for strategies to immortalize these particular human cells, while maintaining their liver-specific functions. The available methods thus far include transfection or transduction with prototypical immortalization genes and conditional immortalization by temperature-based regulation, recombinase-based control and transcriptional regulation. Although hepatocyte immortalization has been explored for decades, cell lines with in vivo-like hepatic functionality are largely lacking. In the upcoming years, more attention should be paid to the search for culture systems that support the differentiation status of immortalized human hepatocytes.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the grants from the University Hospital of Vrije Universiteit Brussel (Willy Gepts Fonds UZ-VUB), the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen), the European Union (FP7/Cosmetics Europe projects HeMiBio and DETECTIVE) and the European Research Council (ERC Starting Grant project CONNECT).

References

  • 1.Hewitt NJ, Lechon MJ, Houston JB, et al. Primary hepatocytes: current understanding of the regulation of metabolic enzymes and transporter proteins, and pharmaceutical practice for the use of hepatocytes in metabolism, enzyme induction, transporter, clearance, and hepatotoxicity studies. Drug Metab Rev. 2007;39:159–234. doi: 10.1080/03602530601093489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sinz M, Kim S. Stem cells, immortalized cells and primary cells in ADMET assays. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2006;3:79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2006.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Soldatow VY, Lecluyse EL, Griffith LG, et al. In vitro models for liver toxicity testing. Toxicol Res. 2013;2:23–39. doi: 10.1039/C2TX20051A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rodrigues RM, De Kock J, Branson S, et al. Human skin-derived stem cells as a novel cell source for in vitro hepatotoxicity screening of pharmaceuticals. Stem Cells Dev. 2014;23:44–55. doi: 10.1089/scd.2013.0157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Allen JW, Bhatia SN. Improving the next generation of bioartificial liver devices. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2002;13:447–454. doi: 10.1016/s1084952102001337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chamuleau RA, Deurholt T, Hoekstra R. Which are the right cells to be used in a bioartificial liver? Metab Brain Dis. 2005;20:327–335. doi: 10.1007/s11011-005-7914-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brandon EF, Raap CD, Meijerman I, et al. An update on in vitro test methods in human hepatic drug biotransformation research: pros and cons. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2003;189:233–246. doi: 10.1016/s0041-008x(03)00128-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Choi S, Sainz B, Corcoran P, et al. Characterization of increased drug metabolism activity in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-treated Huh7 hepatoma cells. Xenobiotica. 2009;39:205–217. doi: 10.1080/00498250802613620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lim PL, Tan W, Latchoumycandane C, et al. Molecular and functional characterization of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporter expression in the novel spontaneously immortalized human hepatocyte line HC-04. Toxicol In Vitro. 2007;21:1390–1401. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2007.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Szabo M, Veres Z, Baranyai Z, et al. Comparison of human hepatoma HepaRG cells with human and rat hepatocytes in uptake transport assays in order to predict a risk of drug induced hepatotoxicity. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Aninat C, Piton A, Glaise D, et al. Expression of cytochromes P450, conjugating enzymes and nuclear receptors in human hepatoma HepaRG cells. Drug Metab Dispos. 2006;34:75–83. doi: 10.1124/dmd.105.006759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guillouzo A, Corlu A, Aninat C, et al. The human hepatoma HepaRG cells: a highly differentiated model for studies of liver metabolism and toxicity of xenobiotics. Chem Biol Interact. 2007;168:66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2006.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Deurholt T, van Til NP, Chhatta AA, et al. Novel immortalized human fetal liver cell line, cBAL111, has the potential to differentiate into functional hepatocytes. BMC Biotechnol. 2009;9:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-9-89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Reid Y, Gaddipati JP, Yadav D, et al. Establishment of a human neonatal hepatocyte cell line. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2009;45:535–542. doi: 10.1007/s11626-009-9219-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Clayton RF, Rinaldi A, Kandyba EE, et al. Liver cell lines for the study of hepatocyte functions and immunological response. Liver Int. 2005;25:389–402. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01017.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tsuruga Y, Kiyono T, Matsushita M, et al. Establishment of immortalized human hepatocytes by introduction of HPV16 E6/E7 and hTERT as cell sources for liver cell-based therapy. Cell Transplant. 2008;17:1083–1094. doi: 10.3727/096368908786991542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fukaya K, Asahi S, Nagamori S, et al. Establishment of a human hepatocyte line (OUMS-29) having CYP 1A1 and 1A2 activities from fetal liver tissue by transfection of SV40 LT. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2001;37:266–269. doi: 10.1007/BF02577541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hariparsad N, Carr BA, Evers R, et al. Comparison of immortalized Fa2N-4 cells and human hepatocytes as in vitro models for cytochrome P450 induction. Drug Metab Dispos. 2008;36:1046–1055. doi: 10.1124/dmd.108.020677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nguyen TH, Mai G, Villiger P, et al. Treatment of acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure in the mouse with conditionally immortalized human hepatocytes. J Hepatol. 2005;43:1031–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.05.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cascio SM. Novel strategies for immortalization of human hepatocytes. Artif Organs. 2001;25:529–538. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2001.025007529.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pan X, Li J, Du W, et al. Establishment and characterization of immortalized human hepatocyte cell line for applications in bioartificial livers. Biotechnol Lett. 2012;34:2183–2190. doi: 10.1007/s10529-012-1025-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li J, Li LJ, Cao HC, et al. Establishment of highly differentiated immortalized human hepatocyte line with simian virus 40 large tumor antigen for liver based cell therapy. ASAIO J. 2005;51:262–268. doi: 10.1097/01.mat.0000161045.16805.8b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schippers IJ, Moshage H, Roelofsen H, et al. Immortalized human hepatocytes as a tool for the study of hepatocytic (de-)differentiation. Cell Biol Toxicol. 1997;13:375–386. doi: 10.1023/a:1007404028681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pfeifer AM, Cole KE, Smoot DT, et al. Simian virus 40 large tumor antigen-immortalized normal human liver epithelial cells express hepatocyte characteristics and metabolize chemical carcinogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:5123–5127. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.11.5123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Noguchi M, Hirohashi S. Cell lines from non-neoplastic liver and hepatocellular carcinoma tissue from a single patient. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 1996;32:135–137. doi: 10.1007/BF02723678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhao L, Li J, Lv G, et al. Evaluation of a reversibly immortalized human hepatocyte line in bioartificial liver in pigs. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11:4116–4126. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen Y, Li J, Liu X, et al. Transplantation of immortalized human fetal hepatocytes prevents acute liver failure in 90% hepatectomized mice. Transplant Proc. 2010;42:1907–1914. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.01.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Smalley M, Leiper K, Tootle R, et al. Immortalization of human hepatocytes by temperature-sensitive SV40 large-T antigen. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2001;37:166–168. doi: 10.1290/1071-2690(2001)037<0166:IOHHBT>2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kobayashi N, Fujiwara T, Westerman KA, et al. Prevention of acute liver failure in rats with reversibly immortalized human hepatocytes. Science. 2000;287:1258–1262. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5456.1258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ilyin G, Rescan C, Rialland M, et al. Growth control and cell cycle progression in cultured hepatocytes. In: Berry M, Edwards A, editors. The Hepatocyte Review. Kluwer Academic Publishers; The Netherlands: 2000. pp. 263–280. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Runge DM, Runge D, Dorko K, et al. Epidermal growth factor- and hepatocyte growth factor-receptor activity in serum-free cultures of human hepatocytes. J Hepatol. 1999;30:265–274. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(99)80073-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ozturk M, Arslan-Ergul A, Bagislar S, et al. Senescence and immortality in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2009;286:103–113. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schafer KA. The cell cycle: a review. Vet Pathol. 1998;35:461–478. doi: 10.1177/030098589803500601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wege H, Le HT, Chui MS, et al. Telomerase reconstitution immortalizes human fetal hepatocytes without disrupting their differentiation potential. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:432–444. doi: 10.1053/gast.2003.50064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chiu CP, Harley CB. Replicative senescence and cell immortality: the role of telomeres and telomerase. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1997;214:99–106. doi: 10.3181/00379727-214-44075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lipps C, May T, Hauser H, et al. Eternity and functionality: rational access to physiologically relevant cell lines. Biol Chem. 2013;394:1637–1648. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2013-0158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.McLean J. Immortalization Strategies for Mammalian Cells. In: Jenkins N, editor. Animal Cell Biotechnology: Methods and Protocols. Humana Press; United States of America: 1999. pp. 61–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Noguchi H, Kobayashi N. Controlled expansion of mammalian cell populations by reversible immortalization. J Biotechnol Biomater. 2013;3:158. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Waki K, Anno K, Ono T, et al. Establishment of functional telomerase immortalized human hepatocytes and a hepatic stellate cell line for telomere-targeting anticancer drug development. Cancer Sci. 2010;101:1678–1685. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01576.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wege H, Chui MS, Le HT, et al. In vitro expansion of human hepatocytes is restricted by telomere-dependent replicative aging. Cell Transplant. 2003;12:897–906. doi: 10.3727/000000003771000138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Curran TR, Bahner RI, Oh W, et al. Mitogen-independent DNA synthesis by fetal rat hepatocytes in primary culture. Exp Cell Res. 1993;209:53–57. doi: 10.1006/excr.1993.1284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Okitsu T, Kobayashi N, Jun HS, et al. Transplantation of reversibly immortalized insulin-secreting human hepatocytes controls diabetes in pancreatectomized pigs. Diabetes. 2004;53:105–112. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.1.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Totsugawa T, Yong C, Rivas-Carrillo JD, et al. Survival of liver failure pigs by transplantation of reversibly immortalized human hepatocytes with tamoxifen-mediated self-recombination. J Hepatol. 2007;47:74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee KM, Choi KH, Ouellette MM. Use of exogenous hTERT to immortalize primary human cells. Cytotechnology. 2004;45:33–38. doi: 10.1007/10.1007/s10616-004-5123-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ray RB, Meyer K, Ray R. Hepatitis C virus core protein promotes immortalization of primary human hepatocytes. Virology. 2000;271:197–204. doi: 10.1006/viro.2000.0295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Basu A, Meyer K, Ray RB, et al. Hepatitis C virus core protein is necessary for the maintenance of immortalized human hepatocytes. Virology. 2002;298:53–62. doi: 10.1006/viro.2002.1460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Werner A, Duvar S, Müthing J, et al. Cultivation and characterization of a new immortalized human hepatocyte cell line, HepZ, for use in an artificial liver support system. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1999;875:364–368. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08518.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wang X, Mani P, Sarkar DP, et al. Ex vivo gene transfer into hepatocytes. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;481:117–140. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-201-4_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kobayashi N, Noguchi H, Watanabe T, et al. Role of immortalized hepatocyte transplantation in acute liver failure. Transplant Proc. 2001;33:645–646. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(00)02182-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kazuki Y, Oshimura M. Human artificial chromosomes for gene delivery and the development of animal models. Mol Ther. 2011;19:1591–1601. doi: 10.1038/mt.2011.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zahler MH, Irani A, Malhi H, et al. The application of a lentiviral vector for gene transfer in fetal human hepatocytes. J Gene Med. 2000;2:186–193. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-2254(200005/06)2:3<186::AID-JGM100>3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kobayashi N, Noguchi H, Fujiwara T, et al. Establishment of a highly differentiated immortalized adult human hepatocyte cell line by retroviral gene transfer. Transplant Proc. 2000;32:2368–2369. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(00)01702-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nguyen TH, Oberholzer J, Birraux J, et al. Highly efficient lentiviral vector-mediated transduction of nondividing, fully reimplantable primary hepatocytes. Mol Ther. 2002;6:199–209. doi: 10.1006/mthe.2002.0653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ohashi K, Park F, Kay MA. Hepatocyte transplantation: clinical and experimental application. J Mol Med. 2001;79:617–630. doi: 10.1007/s001090100260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Pages JC, Andreoletti M, Bennoun M, et al. Efficient retroviral-mediated gene transfer into primary culture of murine and human hepatocytes: expression of the LDL receptor. Hum Gene Ther. 1995;6:21–30. doi: 10.1089/hum.1995.6.1-21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Selden C, Mellor N, Rees M, et al. Growth factors improve gene expression after lentiviral transduction in human adult and fetal hepatocytes. J Gene Med. 2007;9:67–76. doi: 10.1002/jgm.1000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zamule SM, Strom SC, Omiecinski CJ. Preservation of hepatic phenotype in lentiviral-transduced primary human hepatocytes. Chem Biol Interact. 2008;173:179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2008.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ito M, Ito R, Yoshihara D, et al. Immortalized hepatocytes using human artificial chromosome. Cell Transplant. 2008;17:165–171. doi: 10.3727/000000008783906883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ito M, Ikeno M, Nagata H, et al. Treatment of nonalbumin rats by transplantation of immortalized hepatocytes using artificial human chromosome. Transplant Proc. 2009;41:422–424. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shitara S, Kakeda M, Nagata K, et al. Telomerase-mediated life-span extension of human primary fibroblasts by human artificial chromosome (HAC) vector. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;369:807–811. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.02.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Watanabe T, Shibata N, Westerman KA, et al. Establishment of immortalized human hepatic stellate scavenger cells to develop bioartificial livers. Transplantation. 2003;75:1873–1880. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000064621.50907.A6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Inoue Y, Miyazaki M, Tsuji T, et al. Reactivation of liver-specific gene expression in an immortalized human hepatocyte cell line by introduction of the human HNF4alpha2 gene. Int J Mol Med. 2001;8:481–487. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.8.5.481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Soltanpour Y, Hilgendorf C, Ahlström MM, et al. Characterization of THLE-cytochrome P450 (P450) cell lines: gene expression background and relationship to P450-enzyme activity. Drug Metab Dispos. 2012;40:2054–2058. doi: 10.1124/dmd.112.045815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kobayashi N, Kunieda T, Sakaguchi M, et al. Active expression of p21 facilitates differentiation of immortalized human hepatocytes. Transplant Proc. 2003;35:433–434. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(02)03784-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kunieda T, Kobayashi N, Sakaguchi M, et al. Transduction of immortalized human hepatocytes with p21 to enhance differentiated phenotypes. Cell Transplant. 2002;11:421–428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Allen KJ, Reyes R, Demmler K, et al. Conditionally immortalized mouse hepatocytes for use in liver gene therapy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;15:1325–1332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Fox IJ, Chowdhury NR, Gupta S, et al. Conditional immortalization of Gunn rat hepatocytes: an ex vivo model for evaluating methods for bilirubin-UDP-glucuronosyltransferase gene transfer. Hepatology. 1995;21:837–846. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.May T, Hauser H, Wirth D. Transcriptional control of SV40 T-antigen expression allows a complete reversion of immortalization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:5529–5538. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Westerman KA, Leboulch P. Reversible immortalization of mammalian cells mediated by retroviral transfer and site-specific recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:8971–8976. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.17.8971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Paillard F. Reversible cell immortalization with the Cre-lox system. Hum Gene Ther. 1999;10:1597–1598. doi: 10.1089/10430349950017590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kobayashi N, Noguchi H, Fujiwara T, et al. Establishment of a reversibly immortalized human hepatocyte cell line by using Cre/loxP site-specific recombination. Transplant Proc. 2000;32:1121–1122. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(00)01154-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Anastassiadis K, Rostovskaya M, Lubitz S, et al. Precise conditional immortalization of mouse cells using tetracycline-regulated SV40 large T-antigen. Genesis. 2010;48:220–232. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Jazwa A, Florczyk U, Jozkowicz A, et al. Gene therapy on demand: site-specific regulation of gene therapy. Gene. 2013;525:229–238. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.03.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ikeda M, Kato N, Mizutani T, et al. Analysis of the cell tropism of HCV by using in vitro HCV-infected human lymphocytes and hepatocytes. J Hepatol. 1997;27:445–454. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(97)80347-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kato N, Ikeda M, Mizutani T, et al. Replication of hepatitis C virus in cultured non-neoplastic human hepatocytes. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1996;87:787–792. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1996.tb02101.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ikeda F, Dansako H, Nishimura G, et al. Amino acid substitutions of hepatitis C virus core protein are not associated with intracellular antiviral response to interferon-α in vitro. Liver Int. 2010;30:1324–1331. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2010.02299.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Raychoudhuri A, Shrivastava S, Steele R, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection impairs IRF-7 translocation and alpha interferon synthesis in immortalized human hepatocytes. J Virol. 2010;84:10991–10998. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00900-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Raychoudhuri A, Shrivastava S, Steele R, et al. ISG56 and IFITM1 proteins inhibit hepatitis C virus replication. J Virol. 2011;85:12881–12889. doi: 10.1128/JVI.05633-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Triyatni M, Saunier B, Maruvada P, et al. Interaction of hepatitis C virus-like particles and cells: a model system for studying viral binding and entry. J Virol. 2002;76:9335–9344. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.18.9335-9344.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Yu GY, He G, Li CY, et al. Hepatic expression of HCV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase triggers innate immune signaling and cytokine production. Mol Cell. 2012;48:313–321. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yu S, Chen J, Wu M, et al. Hepatitis B virus polymerase inhibits RIG-I- and Toll-like receptor 3-mediated beta interferon induction in human hepatocytes through interference with interferon regulatory factor 3 activation and dampening of the interaction between TBK1/IKKepsilon and DDX3. J Gen Virol. 2010;91:2080–2090. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.020552-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Brown JJ, Parashar B, Moshage H, et al. A long-term hepatitis B viremia model generated by transplanting non-tumorigenic immortalized human hepatocytes in Rag-2-deficient mice. Hepatology. 2000;31:173–181. doi: 10.1002/hep.510310126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Heim D, Cornils K, Schulze K, et al. Retroviral insertional mutagenesis in telomerase-immortalized hepatocytes identifies RIPK4 as novel tumor suppressor in human hepatocarcinogenesis. Oncogene. 2014 doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.551. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wege H, Heim D, Lütgehetmann M, et al. Forced activation of β-catenin signaling supports the transformation of hTERT-immortalized human fetal hepatocytes. Mol Cancer Res. 2011;9:1222–1231. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Guller MC, Andre J, Legrand A, et al. c-Fos accelerates hepatocyte conversion to a fibroblastoid phenotype through ERK-mediated upregulation of paxillin-Serine178 phosphorylation. Mol Carcinog. 2009;48:532–544. doi: 10.1002/mc.20492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Guller M, Toualbi-Abed K, Legrand A, et al. c-fos overexpression increases the proliferation of human hepatocytes by stabilizing nuclear cyclin D1. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:6339–6346. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.6339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.De Gottardi A, Vinciguerra M, Sgroi A, et al. Microarray analyses and molecular profiling of steatosis induction in immortalized human hepatocytes. Lab Invest. 2007;87:792–806. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Martel C, Allouche M, Esposti DD, et al. Glycogen synthase kinase 3-mediated voltage-dependent anion channel phosphorylation controls outer mitochondrial membrane permeability during lipid accumulation. Hepatology. 2013;57:93–102. doi: 10.1002/hep.25967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Pien GC, Basner-Tschakarjan E, Hui DJ, et al. Capsid antigen presentation flags human hepatocytes for destruction after transduction by adeno-associated viral vectors. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:1688–1695. doi: 10.1172/JCI36891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Finn JD, Hui D, Downey HD, et al. Proteasome inhibitors decrease AAV2 capsid derived peptide epitope presentation on MHC class I following transduction. Mol Ther. 2010;18:135–142. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Martino AT, Basner-Tschakarjan E, Markusic DM, et al. Engineered AAV vector minimizes in vivo targeting of transduced hepatocytes by capsid-specific CD8+ T cells. Blood. 2013;121:2224–2233. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-10-460733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.LeCluyse E, Sinz M, Hewitt N, et al. Cytochrome P450 Induction. In: Lu C, Li A, editors. Enzyme Inhibition in Drug Discovery and Development: The Good and the Bad. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; United States of America: 2010. pp. 265–314. [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Rand AA, Rooney JP, Butt CM, et al. Cellular toxicity associated with exposure to perfluorinated carboxylates (PFCAs) and their metabolic precursors. Chem Res Toxicol. 2014;27:42–50. doi: 10.1021/tx400317p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Thompson RA, Isin EM, Li Y, et al. In vitro approach to assess the potential for risk of idiosyncratic adverse reactions caused by candidate drugs. Chem Res Toxicol. 2012;25:1616–1632. doi: 10.1021/tx300091x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Dambach DM, Andrews BA, Moulin F. New technologies and screening strategies for hepatotoxicity: use of in vitro models. Toxicol Pathol. 2005;33:17–26. doi: 10.1080/01926230590522284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Winter HK, Ehrlich VA, Grusch M, et al. Use of four new human-derived liver-cell lines for the detection of genotoxic compounds in the single-cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) assay. Mutat Res. 2008;657:133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Mills JB, Rose KA, Sadagopan N, et al. Induction of drug metabolism enzymes and MDR1 using a novel human hepatocyte cell line. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;309:303–309. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.061713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Wang B, Chen G, Mao Z, et al. Preparation and cellular uptake of PLGA particles loaded with lamivudine. Chin Sci Bull. 2012;57:3985–3993. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Tsuruga Y, Kiyono T, Matsushita M, et al. Effect of intrasplenic transplantation of immortalized human hepatocytes in the treatment of acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure SCID mice. Transplant Proc. 2008;40:617–619. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Willberg CB, Ward SM, Clayton RF, et al. Protection of hepatocytes from cytotoxic T cell mediated killing by interferon-alpha. PLoS One. 2007;2:e791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Ho L, Titus AS, Banerjee KK, et al. SIRT4 regulates ATP homeostasis and mediates a retrograde signaling via AMPK. Aging. 2013;5:835–849. doi: 10.18632/aging.100616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Wargent ET, Zaibi MS, Silvestri C, et al. The cannabinoid Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV) ameliorates insulin sensitivity in two mouse models of obesity. Nutr Diabetes. 2013;3:e68. doi: 10.1038/nutd.2013.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Caron S, Huaman Samanez C, Dehondt H, et al. Farnesoid X receptor inhibits the transcriptional activity of carbohydrate response element binding protein in human hepatocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33:2202–2211. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01004-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Lauressergues E, Bert E, Duriez P, et al. Does endoplasmic reticulum stress participate in APD-induced hepatic metabolic dysregulation? Neuropharmacology. 2012;62:784–796. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.08.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Lasfer M, Vadrot N, Aoudjehane L, et al. Cadmium induces mitochondria-dependent apoptosis of normal human hepatocytes. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2008;24:55–62. doi: 10.1007/s10565-007-9015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Kato N, Ikeda M, Sugiyama K, et al. Hepatitis C virus population dynamics in human lymphocytes and hepatocytes infected in vitro. J Gen Virol. 1998;79:1859–1869. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-79-8-1859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Ikeda M, Nozaki A, Sugiyama K, et al. Characterization of antiviral activity of lactoferrin against hepatitis C virus infection in human cultured cells. Virus Res. 2000;66:51–63. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1702(99)00121-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Suzuki K, Aoki K, Ohnami S, et al. Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of interferon alpha inhibits hepatitis C virus replication in hepatocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;307:814–819. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)01255-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Ikeda M, Sugiyama K, Mizutani T, et al. Human hepatocyte clonal cell lines that support persistent replication of hepatitis C virus. Virus Res. 1998;56:157–167. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1702(98)00063-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Tsuchihara K, Tanaka T, Hijikata M, et al. Specific interaction of polypyrimidine tract-binding protein with the extreme 3′-terminal structure of the hepatitis C virus genome, the 3′X. J Virol. 1997;71:6720–6726. doi: 10.1128/jvi.71.9.6720-6726.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Cuconati A, Mills C, Goddard C, et al. Suppression of AKT anti-apoptotic signaling by a novel drug candidate results in growth arrest and apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Brockhausen J, Tay SS, Grzelak CA, et al. miR-181a mediates TGF-β-induced hepatocyte EMT and is dysregulated in cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer. Liver Int. 2014 doi: 10.1111/liv.12517. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Wilson R, Warner N, Ryan K, et al. The hepatitis B e antigen suppresses IL-1β-mediated NF-κB activation in hepatocytes. J Viral Hepat. 2011;18:e499–e507. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2011.01484.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Shah F, Louise-May S, Greene N. Chemotypes sensitivity and predictivity of in vivo outcomes for cytotoxic assays in THLE and HepG2 cell lines. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2014;24:2753–2757. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.04.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Gustafsson F, Foster AJ, Sarda S, et al. A correlation between the in vitro drug toxicity of drugs to cell lines that express human P450s and their propensity to cause liver injury in humans. Toxicol Sci. 2014;137:189–211. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kft223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Rodrigues AV, Rollison HE, Martin S, et al. In vitro exploration of potential mechanisms of toxicity of the human hepatotoxic drug fenclozic acid. Arch Toxicol. 2013;87:1569–1579. doi: 10.1007/s00204-013-1056-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Foster AJ, Prime LH, Gustafsson F, et al. Bioactivation of the cannabinoid receptor antagonist rimonabant to a cytotoxic iminium ion metabolite. Chem Res Toxicol. 2013;26:124–135. doi: 10.1021/tx300418w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Antolino-Lobo I, Meulenbelt J, Nijmeijer SM, et al. Differential roles of phase I and phase II enzymes in 3,4-methylendioxymethamphetamine-induced cytotoxicity. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38:1105–1112. doi: 10.1124/dmd.110.032359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Saha S, New LS, Ho HK, et al. Direct toxicity effects of sulfo-conjugated troglitazone on human hepatocytes. Toxicol Lett. 2010;195:135–141. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Saha S, New LS, Ho HK, et al. Investigation of the role of the thiazolidinedione ring of troglitazone in inducing hepatotoxicity. Toxicol Lett. 2010;192:141–149. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Ip BC, Hu KQ, Liu C, et al. Lycopene metabolite, apo-10′-lycopenoic acid, inhibits diethylnitrosamine-initiated, high fat diet-promoted hepatic inflammation and tumorigenesis in mice. Cancer Prev Res. 2013;6:1304–1316. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Krajka-Kuzniak V, Paluszczak J, Oszmianski J, et al. Hawthorn (Crataegus oxyacantha L.) bark extract regulates antioxidant response element (ARE)-mediated enzyme expression via Nrf2 pathway activation in normal hepatocyte cell line. Phytother Res. 2014;28:593–602. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Krajka-Kuzniak V, Paluszczak J, Celewicz L, et al. Phloretamide, an apple phenolic compound, activates the Nrf2/ARE pathway in human hepatocytes. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013;51:202–209. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.09.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Krajka-Kuzniak V, Paluszczak J, Baer-Dubowska W. Xanthohumol induces phase II enzymes via Nrf2 in human hepatocytes in vitro. Toxicol In Vitro. 2013;27:149–156. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2012.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Ait-Goughoulte M, Kanda T, Meyer K, et al. Hepatitis C virus genotype 1a growth and induction of autophagy. J Virol. 2008;82:2241–2249. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02093-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Kanda T, Basu A, Steele R, et al. Generation of infectious hepatitis C virus in immortalized human hepatocytes. J Virol. 2006;80:4633–4639. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.9.4633-4639.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Kanda T, Steele R, Ray R, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection induces the beta interferon signaling pathway in immortalized human hepatocytes. J Virol. 2007;81:12375–12381. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01695-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Basu A, Saito K, Meyer K, et al. Stellate cell apoptosis by a soluble mediator from immortalized human hepatocytes. Apoptosis. 2006;11:1391–1400. doi: 10.1007/s10495-006-8312-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Mazumdar B, Meyer K, Ray R. N-terminal region of gelsolin induces apoptosis of activated hepatic stellate cells by a caspase-dependent mechanism. PLoS One. 2012;7:e44461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Qiu C, Hanson E, Olivier E, et al. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into hematopoietic cells by coculture with human fetal liver cells recapitulates the globin switch that occurs early in development. Exp Hematol. 2005;33:1450–1458. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2005.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Gao Y, Theng SS, Zhuo J, et al. FAT10, an ubiquitin-like protein, confers malignant properties in non-tumorigenic and tumorigenic cells. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35:923–934. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Wang Y, Toh HC, Chow P, et al. MicroRNA-224 is up-regulated in hepatocellular carcinoma through epigenetic mechanisms. FASEB J. 2012;26:3032–3041. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-201855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Tomimaru Y, Xu CQ, Nambotin SB, et al. Loss of exon 4 in a human T-cell factor-4 isoform promotes hepatic tumourigenicity. Liver Int. 2013;33:1536–1548. doi: 10.1111/liv.12189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Nonaka M, Tazuma S, Hyogo H, et al. Cytoprotective effect of tauroursodeoxycholate on hepatocyte apoptosis induced by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligand. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:e198–e206. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05073.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Nakamura K, Yamagishi S, Yoshida T, et al. Hydrogen peroxide stimulates pigment epithelium-derived factor gene and protein expression in the human hepatocyte cell line OUMS-29. J Int Med Res. 2007;35:427–432. doi: 10.1177/147323000703500319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Shishido S, Koga H, Harada M, et al. Hydrogen peroxide overproduction in megamitochondria of troglitazone-treated human hepatocytes. Hepatology. 2003;37:136–147. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES