Skip to main content
Acta Radiologica Open logoLink to Acta Radiologica Open
. 2015 Sep 11;4(9):2058460115592164. doi: 10.1177/2058460115592164

Excellent long-term results with iliac stenting in local anesthesia for post-thrombotic syndrome

Lotte Klitfod 1,, Sven Just 1, Pia Foegh 1, Niels Baekgaard 1
PMCID: PMC4580121  PMID: 26445677

Abstract

Background

Only 20% of iliac veins will recanalize on anticoagulation (AC) treatment alone and may, therefore, develop venous obstruction after iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT). A considerable number of these patients will suffer from post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) leading to impaired quality of life in more than 50%. Endovascular treatment for iliac vein obstruction using stents is known to alleviate PTS symptoms in selected patients.

Purpose

To report the Danish long-term results of endovascular treatment with iliac stenting.

Material and Methods

From 2000 to 2013 consecutive patients were evaluated and 19 patients with severe venous claudication were identified and subsequently underwent angioplasty and stenting. AC treatment was prescribed for 6 months, and knee-high class II compression stocking recommended for 1 year. Scheduled follow-up was done in the outpatient clinic at 6 weeks, 3 months, and annually thereafter.

Results

Nineteen patients, all women, all with left-sided iliac vein obstruction, and all with severe PTS symptoms were included. The median follow-up time was 81 months (range, 1–146 months; mean, 69 months). Primary patency rate of the inserted iliac stent was 89% (17/19) and 16 patients (84 %) had almost or total symptom relief at follow-up.

Conclusion

Endovascular stenting of iliac obstruction in local anesthesia is minimally invasive and shows excellent long-term outcomes for patients suffering from PTS.

Keywords: Vascular, ultrasound, stents, veins, obstruction

Introduction

The most feared long-term complication of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is the post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), which varies widely from 20% to 80% depending on diagnostic criteria, study population, and time from initial deep venous thrombosis (DVT) to assessment of outcome (1,2). Risk factors include location of the DVT and DVT recurrence, gender (1.5 times greater risk for women), obesity, and genetic factors (thrombophilia) (1,2). Only 20% of iliac veins will recanalize on anticoagulation (AC) treatment alone after an iliofemoral DVT leading to PTS for a considerable number of patients (3). PTS symptoms include venous claudication, leg swelling, and venous ulcerations and leads to impaired quality of life in more than 50% of the patients (2,4).

Endovascular treatment with iliac stenting is known to alleviate PTS symptoms in selected groups of patients with partial or complete obstruction of the venous outflow tract. This study reports the Danish long-term results of endovascular treatment with iliac stenting done in local anesthesia.

Material and Methods

The outpatient clinic at Gentofte University Hospital in Copenhagen is a tertiary center that receives referrals of patients with PTS from other Danish venous centers. All patients are evaluated for possible endovascular treatment based on symptoms and clinical and ultrasonic findings. The ultrasound duplex scan is performed with the patient in the standing position (examining the common femoral vein, the femoral vein, the popliteal vein, the great and the small saphenous veins) and in the supine position (examining the iliac veins and the inferior vena cava). Venous computed tomography (CTV) is not done routinely in our set-up, but due to diagnostic challenges in the referring department, two patients had it done.

During 2000–2013 consecutive patients were evaluated and 19 were identified as candidates to subsequently undergo angioplasty and stenting. The patients were checked for coagulation disorders (Factor V Leiden, Protein S and C, Lupus anticoagulans, Homocystein, Antithrombin, and Anti-Cardiolipin) and if found positive, referred to anticoagulation specialists for further treatment.

After ultrasound-guided puncture of the ipsilateral common femoral or popliteal vein, the occluded or stenotic part of the iliac vein was passed with a Terumo guidewire, which was further advanced into the inferior vena cava. An obstruction of more than 50% led to angioplasty and stenting, no pressure gradients were measured. Predilatation of the vein using 6–10 mm balloons and postdilatation using 10–12 mm balloons was done before and after placement of 4–9 cm self-expandable stents. Most procedures were done under local anesthesia alone, but in a few cases intravenous pain medication was needed. Intravenous Heparin (5000 IU) was given during the procedure. The patients were discharged the same day or on the first postoperative day. AC treatment with Warfarin targeting INR in the range of 2.5–3 with bridging of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was prescribed for 6 months, and knee-high class II compression stocking was recommended for 1 year. Patients with severe thrombophilia were kept on lifelong AC. Scheduled follow-up was done in the outpatient clinic at 6 weeks, 3 months, and annually thereafter.

To evaluate the patients after the intervention, the Villalta scale was used. The Villalta scale is a validated and reliable clinical classification measuring PTS incorporating the assessment of five subjective (patient-rated) venous symptoms (pain, cramps, heaviness, paresthesia, and pruritus) and six objective (clinical-rated) venous signs (pretibial edema, skin induration, hyperpigmentation, redness, venous ectasia, and pain on calf compression), as well as the presence or absence of ulcer in the DVT-affected leg (5,6). No other classifications were used, but clinical symptoms were noted in the patient charts.

Descriptive statistics on patency and success rates are given. Observation time, age, and follow-up period are reported as mean, median, and ranges.

Results

Nineteen female patients with left iliac stenosis/occlusion were enrolled. Median age was 32 years (mean, 33 years; range, 19–48 years) (Table 1). All patients reported PTS symptoms with the dominating symptom being venous claudication in the range of 200–500 m. Other symptoms included leg swelling with pain and heaviness. None of the patients had venous stasis dermatitis or ulcers (Table 1). In nine patients no significant lesions or reflux were observed below the common femoral vein at the preoperative evaluation suggesting all valves were intact distal to the iliac changes. The remaining patients demonstrated various changes in the lower leg deep vein system, i.e. thickening of the vein wall and/or scarring in the vein lumen and/or a slight reflux of the femoral and/or popliteal vein.

Table 1.

Patient demographics.

Age, years (mean (range)) 32 (19–48)
Gender, n (%)
 Women 19 (100)
 Men 0 (0)
 Previous DVT, n (%) 17 (89)
Treatment of DVT, n (%)
 Anticoagulation alone 13 (68)
 CDT and anticoagulation 1 (5)
 Operation and anticoagulation 2 (11)
 None 3 (16)
Thrombophilia, n (%)
 None 10 (53)
 Factor V Leiden mutation 8 (42)
 Others 1 (5)
Symptoms before treatment, n*
 Venous claudication 19
 Swelling 9
 Heaviness 5
 Pain 8
 Restless legs 1
 Tenderness 2
*

Some patients suffered from more than one symptom.

CDT, catheter-directed-thrombolysis.

The technical success rate was 100%. Wallstents™ Endoprosthesis (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) were used in most cases (18/19 = 95%). Balloons of 6–8 mm, rarely 10 mm, were used to predilate the vein before stent placement, and 10–12 mm balloons were used to dilate the stents. All stents were located in the iliac veins, however, in three cases stents were placed in the very proximal part of the common femoral vein. The length and number of stents are shown in Table 2. No patients died within the observation period and only minor complications were observed, i.e. transient pain during expansion of the stent. The mean time from DVT to endovascular treatment was 113 months (range, 8–445 months); however, two patients had not previously been diagnosed with DVT, but the ultrasound findings strongly suggested so. Fig. 1a and b shows a stenotic iliac vein before and after stenting.

Table 2.

Results after endovenous stenting at follow-up.

Stent length (cm)
 4–5 2
 6–7 3
 9 4
 Overlapping stents 5
 Unknown 5
Stentpatency, n (%)
 Open 17 (89)
 Occluded 2 (11)
Ultrasound distal to the groin
 Open deep system 14
 Reflux/obstruction 5
 Vein wall thickening 4
 Superficial reflux (normal deep system) 3
 Villalta scale, mean (range) 3 (0–12)
PTS, n (%)
 No 13 (68)
 Light 3 (16)
 Moderate 1 (5)
 Severe 0 (0)
 Unknown 2 (11)
 Venous ulcer, n (%) 0 (0)
Symptoms after the intervention, n*
 Venous claudication 2
 Swelling 3
 Occasional swelling 5
 Heaviness 1
 Occasional heaviness 3
 Occasional pain 2
*

Some patients suffered from more than one symptom after the intervention.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

(a) Iliac stenosis in a woman with venous claudication before treatment. (b) The same patient with the iliac stenosis after angioplasty and insertion of a 14 mm/9 cm Wallstent.

Primary patency rate of the inserted iliac stent was 89% (17/19); however, one patient had a prior stent inserted, and due to a stenosis proximal to that, this intervention was done. The median follow-up time was 81 months (range, 1–146 months; mean, 69 months) (Table 2). One patient had a recurrent full-leg DVT 5 years after the procedure unsuitable for catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) or re-stenting leading to moderate PTS (Villalta score of 12). Lifelong AC was initiated due to re-thrombosis. The other patient had a stenotic lesion in the common femoral vein causing the stent to occlude 3 weeks after the intervention leading to light PTS with venous claudication (Villalta scale of 5). The patient was kept on lifelong AC therapy due to Factor V Leiden mutation (heterozygote) and re-DVT.

Ultrasound duplex scan at follow-up is shown in Table 2. Reflux or obstruction was observed in five patients (two from the popliteal to the common femoral vein, two in the popliteal vein, and one in the femoral vein), 10 patients had no reflux in the deep system of the lower extremity (of those, two had greater saphenous vein reflux, one had smaller saphenous vein reflux), and four patients had scarring and thickening of the vein wall (one in the common femoral vein, two in the femoral vein, and one in the popliteal vein). Sixteen patients (84%) had total or almost total symptom relief at follow-up (Table 2). Three patients still suffered from light PTS; however, all reported that stenting had improved their symptoms considerably, apart from those two whose stents occluded.

Discussion

After an iliofemoral DVT a considerable number of patients will suffer from PTS leading to impaired quality of life. Furthermore PTS increases healthcare costs. Treatment success of established PTS relies on patient education and use of compression therapy (7); however, compliance can be poor, and in patients with severe PTS, conservative treatment may have little effect. Stenting in the iliofemoral venous segment for chronic venous disease was first described in 1985 (8). A large study of 447 limbs treated with stenting documented the importance of reducing venous outflow obstruction for the prevention of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) (9). Several studies have shown stenting to be safe, with high patency rates, low rate of in-stent restenosis, and little need for re-intervention (1012).

No specific criteria of when to perform angioplasty and stenting of an obstructive lesion exist in the literature. An iliac stenosis with a direct pressure gradient of 5 mmHg or higher suggests a hemodynamic significant stenosis and may indicate relieve of symptoms after stenting (13). Hemodynamic measurements are, however, poorly related to clinical status (14) and other methods such as IVUS, may give additive information about the degree of the stenosis (14). Morphological obstruction of 50% or higher has arbitrarily been chosen as a criteria for angioplasty and stenting (15).

Patency rate in this study was 89%, which is comparable to rates reported in previous studies (1620). Patency rate mainly depends on the number of lesions needing recanalization, and if the common femoral vein is involved in the obstructive lesion (21). Patency rates are lower in cases with involvement of the common femoral vein. The main part of the patients in this study demonstrated no significant obstructions of the common femoral vein prior to endovascular treatment; however, three patients were stented to the very proximal part of the common femoral vein. Neglén et al. suggested that patency rates rely on the etiology (previous thrombosis is more common in patients with obstructive lesions in the common femoral vein), and emphasizes the importance of covering the entire obstructive lesion, and if needed, to stent below the inguinal ligament (11).

The iliac compression syndrome was described by May and Thurner (22) and by Cockett (23) and is a localized external compression of the vein narrowing the lumen by adjacent arteries. This appears most often on the left side, and in 24% of the “normal” population it leads to a 50% lumen reduction and in 66% it leads to a 25% lumen reduction (24). Furthermore, this is more common in women (25). Keeping in mind that our study population is very small, this may explain why all our patients were female and all the obstructions were located on the left side.

To suggest a randomized controlled study comparing conservative treatment to endovascular treatment in patients suffering from PTS due to iliac obstruction seems unethical and unfeasible. Both safety and efficacy of the angioplasty and stenting is high, and the clinical results are excellent, reducing PTS symptoms and hence the health costs in most of the patients. However, only dedicated centers should perform the endovascular procedures in selected patients. Patients with iliofemoral venous obstruction and moderate to severe PTS symptoms should, in our opinion, be offered angioplasty and stenting.

Future challenges in the treatment and care of PTS/CVI are: first, to acknowledge the fact that effective treatments exist; and second, to ensure, that potential candidates for endovascular treatment are referred to dedicated centers, that have experience and a proper set-up, so patients can be offered a variety of up-to-date surgical and endovascular high-quality treatment options.

In conclusion, PTS is the most severe long-term complication after DVT leading to impaired quality of life for a considerable number of patients suffering from venous claudication, pain, venous stasis dermatitis, edema, or ulcers. The Danish experience with angioplasty and stenting of iliac vein obstruction in local anesthesia seems to be safe and effective in this small group of selected patients suffering from severe PTS. The procedure is minimally invasive and shows excellent long-term outcomes.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References

  • 1.Tick LW, Kramer MH, Rosendaaal FR, et al. Risk factors for post-thrombotic syndrome in patients with a first deep venous thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 2075–2081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baldwin MJ, Moore HM, Rudarakanchana N, et al. Post-thrombotic syndrome: a clinical review. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11: 795–805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Plate G, Åkesson H, Einarsson E, et al. Long-term results of venous thrombectomy combined with temporary arteriovenous fistula. Eur J Vasc Surg 1990; 4: 483–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Catarinella F, Nieman F, de Wolf M, et al. Short-term follow-up of quality-of-life in interventionally treated patients with post-thrombotic syndrome after deep venous occlusion. Phlebology 2014; 29: 104–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Villalta S, Bagatella P, Piccioli A, et al. Assessment of validity and reproducibility of a clinical scale for the post-thrombotic syndrome (abstract). Haemostasis 1994; 24: 158a–158a. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kahn SR. Measurement properties of the Villalta scale to define and classify the severity of the post-thrombotic syndrome. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7: 884–888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kahn SR, Shapiro S, Wells PS, et al. Compression stockings to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2014; 383: 880–888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wright KC, Wallace S, Charnsangavej C, et al. Percutaneous endovascular stents: an experimental evaluation. Radiology 1985; 156: 69–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Neglén P, Thrasher TL, Raju S. Venous outflow obstruction: An underestimated contributor to chronic venous disease. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38: 879–885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Neglén P, Tackett TP, Jr, Raju S. Venous stenting across the inguinal ligament. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48: 1255–1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Warner CJ, Goodney PP, Wallaert JB, et al. Functional outcomes following catheter-based iliac vein stent placement. Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013; 47: 331–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Meissner MH, Eklöf B, Smith PC, et al. Secondary chronic venous disorders. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46: 68S–83S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vedantham S, Clement J, Ferral H, et al. Reporting standards for endovascular treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. J vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20: S391–S408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Raju S, Mc Allister S, Neglén P, et al. Recanalization of totally occluded iliac and adjacent venous segments. J Vasc Surg 2002; 36: 903–911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Neglén P. Chronic deep venous obstruction. Phlebology 2008; 23: 149–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sang H, Li X, Qian A, et al. Outcome of endovascular treatment in post-thrombotic syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg 2014; 28: 1493–1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Titus JM, Moise MA, Bena J, et al. Iliofemoral stenting for venous occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53: 706–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Park JY, Jong HA, Yong SJ, et al. Iliac vein stenting as a durable option for residual stenosis after catheter-directed thrombolysis and angioplasty of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis secondary to May-Thurner syndrome. Phlebology 2014; 29: 461–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mahnken A, Thomson K, de Haan M, et al. CIRSE Standards of practice guidelines on iliocaval stenting. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2014; 37: 592–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sarici IS, Agcaoglu O, Ucar A, et al. Our early experience with iliofemoral vein stenting in patients with post-thrombotic syndrome. Phlebology 2014; 29: 298–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hartung O. Results of stenting for post thrombotic venous obstructive lesions. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2011; 23: 255–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.May R, Thurner J. The cause of the predominantly sinistral occurrence of thrombosis of the pelvic veins. Angiology 1957; 8: 419–427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cockett FB, Thomas ML, Negus D. Iliac vein compression. Its relation to iliofemoral thrombosis and the postthrombotic syndrome. Br Med J 1967; 2: 14–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Oguzkurt L, Ozkan U, Uluson S, et al. Compression of the left common iliac vein in asymptomatic subjects and patients with left iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiology 2008; 19: 366–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kibbe MR, Ujiki M, Goodwin AL, et al. Iliac vein compression in an asymptomatic patient population. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39: 937–943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Radiologica Open are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES