Abstract
Infections caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria are a major concern worldwide. Changes in membrane permeability, including decreased influx and/or increased efflux of antibiotics, are known as key contributors of bacterial MDR. Therefore, it is of critical importance to understand molecular mechanisms that link membrane permeability to MDR in order to design new antimicrobial strategies. In this work, we describe genotype-phenotype correlations in Enterobacter aerogenes, a clinically problematic and antibiotic resistant bacterium. To do this, series of clinical isolates have been periodically collected from two patients during chemotherapy with imipenem. The isolates exhibited different levels of resistance towards multiple classes of antibiotics, consistently with the presence or the absence of porins and efflux pumps. Transport assays were used to characterize membrane permeability defects. Simultaneous genome-wide analysis allowed the identification of putative mutations responsible for MDR. The genome of the imipenem-susceptible isolate G7 was sequenced to closure and used as a reference for comparative genomics. This approach uncovered several loci that were specifically mutated in MDR isolates and whose products are known to control membrane permeability. These were omp35 and omp36, encoding the two major porins; rob, encoding a global AraC-type transcriptional activator; cpxA, phoQ and pmrB, encoding sensor kinases of the CpxRA, PhoPQ and PmrAB two-component regulatory systems, respectively. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of membrane alterations relative to mutational steps in the evolution of MDR of a recognized nosocomial pathogen.
Introduction
Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a significant problem for treatment of bacterial infections worldwide. Although carbapenems are the last β-lactams that retain a nearly-universal activity against Gram-negative bacteria, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) have emerged as important cause of morbidity and mortality among hospital-acquired and long-term care-associated infections. A 2013 report on antibiotic resistance threats by the American Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that 730,000 infections and 3,400 deaths were caused annually by CRE in the US alone [1]. This report also classified CRE as an urgent threat. Therefore, it is of critical importance to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the emergence of MDR and to develop therapeutic alternatives for these problematic bacteria.
Enterobacter aerogenes is one of the most common CRE together with Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. Since the early 1990s, E. aerogenes has emerged as an important MDR pathogen, responsible for nosocomial infections, including respiratory and urinary tracts infections, bacteremia, sepsis and post-chirurgical infections [2–4]. The emergence of MDR strains of E. aerogenes is closely related to the clinical use of broad-spectrum β-lactams and carbapenems [5–10]. Several mechanisms account for MDR, including carbapenem resistance, in this species. Resistance to β-lactams is mainly due to enzymatic degradation by a chromosomal cephalosporinase, plasmid-mediated broad spectrum β-lactamases, and recently acquired carbapenemases [4, 6, 7, 9–14]. Changes in the bacterial cell envelope are also a key contributor to the high levels of resistance towards β-lactams, including carbapenems, and other antibiotic families such as fluoroquinolones [6–10, 12, 15–18]. These changes include quantitative or qualitative modifications of outer membrane porins [6–10, 16, 18–20], and increased levels of efflux pumps [12, 17, 18, 21, 22]. In Enterobacteriaceae, MDR is controlled by several regulatory genes and external factors [15]. MarA, RamA and SoxS are among the best studied MDR regulators. Several mutations have been identified in marRAB, ramAR or soxRS in clinical isolates and associated to MDR [15]. These master regulatory pathways are interconnected and function by up-regulating the expression efflux proteins and down-regulating the expression of porins. In addition, MDR can be induced by clinically used antibiotics such as imipenem. This phenomenon has been observed in vitro, when bacteria are trained to grow in the presence of increasing concentrations of drugs and, in vivo, during antibiotic treatment of infected patients [6–10, 21, 23]. Imipenem and others effectors probably act by activating MDR regulators such as MarA or RamA.
So far, the vast majority of studies on clinical isolates were aimed to identify mutations in the currently known resistance-conferring targets (i.e. promoter or structural mutations in porin genes and mutations in local or global MDR regulatory genes) [24–28]. This approach is biased in that some MDR isolates have no detectable alterations in any of these targets, suggesting that other loci are involved in MDR that have yet to be identified. In addition, clinical isolates are often collected from multiple patients after a local outbreak or obtained from human infections at diverse geographic locations. This approach does not allow the identification of steps of the in vivo evolution of drug resistance. We have previously reported the emergence of MDR in E. aerogenes isolates recovered from several patients during their clinical course in French hospitals [7]. All isolates were isogenic as indicated by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) genotyping and belonged to a prevalent epidemiologic clone that contains a plasmid encoding a TEM-24 extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL). Treatments with imipenem lead to MDR phenotypes associated to outer membrane permeability defects. Yet, virtually nothing was known about how these resistance traits were acquired. In this work, we selected series of clinical isolates obtained from two patients infected with E. aerogenes. Five isolates from patient P and seven isolates from patient G, covering the entire treatment period, were phenotypically characterized and submitted to whole-genome sequencing. This approach uncovered genetic determinants of resistance in E. aerogenes, which are all involved in outer membrane permeability control. These results led to the identification of promising targets for the development of drugs that would function as chemosensitizers to potentiate uptake and activity of existing antibiotics.
Materials and Methods
E. aerogenes strains, growth media, antibiotics and chemicals
The two series of E. aerogenes isolates came from two patients hospitalized in 1997 and were obtained from two different healthcare facilities in the south of France [7] (see S1 Table for sampling sites). Patient P was treated with imipenem and four isolates have been recovered (P1 to P4). Patient G was treated with imipenem and cefpirome, and 7 isolates have been recovered (G1 to G7). All strains were primarily isolated on Mueller Hinton (MH) agar. Because P4 constantly gave rise to heterogeneous colonies after overnight growth at 37°C, we decided to include both small and big colonies in our study. These will be hereafter referred to as P4 and P5, respectively. We selected G7 as a representative E. aerogenes isolate for de novo sequencing and comparative genome analysis based upon its susceptibility to imipenem (see S1 Table for detailed susceptibility profiles). E. aerogenes ATCC13048 (KCTC2190) [29] and ATCC15038 are from our laboratory stock and were used as antibiotic susceptible strains. Unless indicated otherwise, all strains were routinely cultured in Luria Bertani (LB) broth at 37°C with aeration. All media were purchased from Difco Laboratories. Antibiotics and chemicals are from Sigma.
Determination of minimal inhibitory concentrations
Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by broth dilution method in 96-wells microplates (Greiner Bio-One). Bacteria were cultured to exponential phase in cation adjusted MH II broth. Approximately 2×105 colony forming units (CFU) were inoculated into 200 μL of fresh medium containing two-fold serial dilutions of each antibiotic in the absence or in the presence of additive compounds: polymyxin B nonapeptide (PMBN), phenylalanine arginine β-naphthylamide (PAβN), 1-(1-Naphtyl Methyl)-piperazine (NMP), EDTA, or clavulanic acid. PMBN was used as a membrane permeabilizer at a final concentration of 102.4 μg/ml. PAβN and NMP were used as efflux inhibitors at a final concentration of 20 μg/ml and 100 μg/ml, respectively. EDTA was added at a final concentration of 0.5 mM and used as a chelator of divalent cations to disturb the stability of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Clavulanic acid was added at a final concentration of 4 μg/ml and used as a β-lactamase inhibitor. After an incubation of 18 h at 37°C, bacterial growth was evaluated by using 2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-phenyl-2H-tetrazolium chloride as a viability dye. MICs were determined as the lowest concentration of each antibiotic that prevented growth. Values are means of at least three independent experiments and are expressed in μg/ml. Isolates were classified as susceptible (S), intermediate (I) or resistant (R) to the antibiotics tested according to the recommendations of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society for Microbiology (http://www.sfm-microbiologie.org).
Hoechst 33342 influx assays
Hoechst 33342 (H33342) was used as a fluorescent probe for permeability of the outer membrane bilayer. All strains were cultured LB broth until they reached an OD600 between 1.8 and 2.4. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at room temperature, washed once and resuspended in potassium phosphate buffer (PPB) (20 mM K2HPO4, pH 7.0) in the presence of 50 μM carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) to an OD600 of 0.4. 100 μl of bacterial suspensions were transferred in black flat bottom 96 well half area microplates (Greiner Bio-One). H33342 was added to the mixtures at a final concentration of 5 μM and the fluorescence of the H33342 bound to nucleic acids generated by the influx of H33342 into the cells was determined at room temperature by using an Infinite® M200 Pro (TECAN) spectrofluorometer with excitation and emission wavelengths of 360 and 500 nm, respectively. CCCP was used to collapse the protonmotive force (pmf) across the inner membrane. Slopes resulting from the initial increase in H33342 fluorescence were calculated and expressed as changes in fluorescence intensity per second (ΔFI/s). Total accumulation levels were calculated as areas under the curves. All values are means of at least three independent experiments.
Fleroxacin accumulation
All strains were cultured overnight in LB broth until they reached an OD600 of 0.6. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed once and concentrated 10-fold in 50 mM NaPi pH 7.0 supplemented with 5 mM MgCl2 to approximately 1010 CFU/ml. Zero-time samples were removed and fleroxacin was added to a final concentration of 64 μg/ml in the absence or in the presence of 10 μM of CCCP. An incubation of 30 min at 37°C was chosen based on preliminary kinetic experiments to reach saturation (data not shown). 0.8 ml aliquots were then removed, loaded onto a 1.1 ml cushion of 1 M sucrose and immediately centrifuged for 5 min at 4°C. The pellets were resuspended in 0.5 ml of 0.1 M Glycin-HCl pH 3.0 and incubated for 2 h at room temperature to lyse the cells. The lysates were centrifuged for 15 min at 4°C to remove any cell debris and 100 μl-aliquots of the supernatants were transferred in black flat bottom 96 well half area microplates. Spectra were recorded by using an Infinite® M200 Pro (TECAN) spectrofluorometer with excitation and emission wavelengths of 290 nm and 310–700 nm, respectively. The concentration of fleroxacin in the supernatants was estimated after normalization of the spectra to their corresponding tryptophan emission peak at 356 nm. The antibiotic-free control was subtracted from the values obtained for each assay. All values are means of at least three independent experiments.
1,2’-dinaphthylamine efflux assays
The procedure for real-time efflux assays of 1,2’-dinaphthylamine (1,2’-DNA) was adapted from Bohnert et al. [30]. Briefly, all strains were cultured overnight in MH II at 37°C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed once and resuspended in PPB supplemented with 1 mM MgCl2 (Mg-PPB) to a final OD600 of 0.25. Cells were first deenergized by an overnight incubation in Mg-PPB with 5 μM CCCP and loaded with 32 μM 1,2’-DNA at 37°C in the dark. Cells were then centrifuged, washed, resuspended in Mg-PPB and 100 μl of bacterial suspensions were transferred in black flat bottom 96 well half area microplates. Fluorescence was followed over 60 sec and 1,2’-DNA efflux was triggered after rapid reenergization with 5 μl of 1 M glucose and monitored for another 250 sec. All measurements were performed at 37°C by using an Infinite® M200 Pro (TECAN) spectrofluorometer with excitation and emission wavelengths of 370 nm and 420 nm, respectively. Slopes resulting from the initial decrease in 1,2’ DNA fluorescence were calculated and expressed as changes in fluorescence intensity per second (ΔFI/s). Values are means of at least three independent experiments.
Protein methods
All strains were cultured overnight at 37°C in MH broth. Aliquots of cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer to an OD600 of 2.0. After 5 min at 95°C, protein samples (10 μl ∼ 0.2 OD units) were run on polyacrylamide 10% mini gels and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were probed with primary antibodies raised against Escherichia coli OmpF (1:5,000), OmpC (1:5,000), AcrA (1:10,000), AcrB (1:2,000) or TolC (1:2,000). Goat anti-rabbit horseradish-peroxydase conjugated immunoglobulin G secondary antibodies and a chemiluminescent kit (BioRad) were used for detection.
Outer membrane porins were identified and characterized by mass spectrometry. Briefly, strains were cultured overnight in osmotically-controlled media—Nutrient broth (NB, 46(±3) mOsmol/kg) and NB supplemented with 20% sorbitol (NBS, 1290(±23) mOsmol/kg)—, in which the porin ratio is tightly regulated. Cell pellets from 100 ml cultures were washed once and resuspended in 3 ml lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 and 1 mM MgCl2. Bacterial cells were broken by one passage through cell disrupter at 2 kBars. Unlysed cells were removed by centrifugation (8,000 × g for 20 min) and supernatant was ultracentrifuged at 105,000 × g for 1 h. Pellets containing whole cell-envelope were mixed with Laemmli sample buffer, heated for 5 min at 95°C, and membrane proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. Urea (4 M) was added to the SDS-polyacrylamide running gel in order to better resolve Omp35 and Omp36. Bands of interest were excised, digested with trypsin, and analyzed by Nano-LC MS/MS at the SICaPs (Imagif, Service d’identification et de caractérisation des protéines par spectrométrie de masse, Plateforme SICaPS, Campus CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette).
E. aerogenes G7 de novo DNA sequencing and assembly
Total DNA of E. aerogenes G7 was isolated from an overnight culture using the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, except for the following modifications. During the protein precipitation step, the samples were incubated on ice for 10 min and centrifuged for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatants were recovered and centrifuged again to carefully eliminate any precipitates and to ensure an optimal DNA quality for sequencing. Total DNA was qualitatively and quantitatively checked by migration on agarose gels and by using a NanoDrop™ spectrophotometer. The genome of G7 was sequenced de novo on PacBio RS, assembled and annotated by GATC Biotech AG (Cologne, Germany). Genome annotation was performed with Glimmer 3 [31] and RAST (http://rast.nmpdr.org/) [32, 33]. The genome of EAG7 has been deposited in GenBank under National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) accession numbers CP011539 (EAG7 chromosome) and CP011540 (EAG7 plasmid pGPN1).
Genome sequencing of the E. aerogenes isolates and detection of variations
Total DNA was isolated from overnight cultures of the twelve E. aerogenes isolates, including G7, as described above. Genomes were sequenced by using an Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencer (100 bp paired end) and HiSeq reads were mapped to the G7 assembled genome by GATC using BWA [34] with the default parameters. SNPs and InDels were called using GATK's UnifiedGenotyper. All SNPs and InDels were individually checked in silico using the Tablet software [35], to eliminate GATK’s false positives. SNPs and InDels that lead to modifications of predicted coding sequences and that were specifically present in resistant isolates were confirmed by PCR and sequencing (Eurofins, MWG, Ebersberg, Germany). HiSeq reads that could not be mapped to the PacBio assembled genome of G7 were considered as regions of divergence. Genome assembly from the HiSeq data was first performed by using Velvet 1.2.10 [36] and resulted in several contigs for each isolate. The contigs of the twelve genomes were then aligned relative to the assembled genome of G7 and compared with progressiveMauve [37]. Specific sequences from each strain were isolated and analyzed by blastn [38]. Phage-related sequences were searched by using PHAST (http://phast.wishartlab.com) [39]. Insertion sequences (IS) were characterized by using the ISFinder database (http://www-is.biotoul.fr) [40]. Putative integrative conjugative elements (ICEs) and integrative mobilizable element (IMEs) were found by performing iterative similarity searches followed by protein clustering. With this approach, ICEs would correspond to recombinase/integrase-bounded regions containing type IV secretion system (T4SS) proteins and MobA-type relaxase(s), while IMEs would comprise relaxase(s) with no neighbor T4SS. Metadata were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession SRP056584.
Results
Clinical isolates and evolution of antibiotic resistance
Patient P was hospitalized without any sign of infection. However, the patient was immunocompromised and rapidly developed a respiratory tract infection associated to E. aerogenes. Isolate P1 corresponded to the first isolation of E. aerogenes from a bronchial aspirate and was susceptible to almost all tested antibiotics including gentamicin (data not shown), carbapenems, third (ceftazidime and cefotaxime) and fourth (cefepime) generation cephalosporins, and quinolones (Table 1 and S1 Table for detailed MIC values). From that point, patient P was treated with imipenem. Four days after the first use of imipenem, P2 was isolated from a new bronchial aspirate. Although this strain still retained susceptibility to gentamicin, it was fully resistant to quinolones, carbapenems and cephalosporins. The last strains P4 and P5, isolated after twelve days of treatment, presented the same MDR phenotype. Interestingly, the mid-term isolate P3 was resistant to quinolones but susceptible to carbapenems, suggesting the co-existence of two subpopulations at day 4.
Table 1. Phenotypic characterization of E. aerogenes strains.
Patient P | Patient G | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nb of days | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | 35 | 42 | 49 | 56 | 63 | 70 | 91 | |||
Imipenem treatment | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||
Cefpirome treatment | + | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sampling site a | T | T | T | T | T | U | V | S | V | V | B | T | ||||||||||||||||
Chloramphenicol | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | S | |||||||||||||||
Fleroxacin | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | S | |||||||||||||||
Norfloxacin | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | S | |||||||||||||||
Nalidixic acid | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | S | |||||||||||||||
Erythromycin | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||||||
Imipenem | S | R | S | R | R | S | R | S | S | R | R | S | S | |||||||||||||||
Ertapenem | S | R | S | R | R | S | R | S | S | R | R | S | S | |||||||||||||||
Cefepime | S | R | S | R | R | R | R | S | S | R | R | S | S | |||||||||||||||
Ceftazidime | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | S | |||||||||||||||
Cefotaxime | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | S | S | R | R | S | S | |||||||||||||||
Polymyxin B | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | S | S | S | |||||||||||||||
Tetracycline | S | R | R | R | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | S | |||||||||||||||
Isolate | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | G1 | G2 | G3 | G4 | G5 | G6 | G7 | ATCC15038 | |||||||||||||||
Porins b * | + | - | + | - | - | + | - | + | + | - | - | + | + | |||||||||||||||
Efflux Pump Proteins b | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
E. aerogenes isolates were recovered periodically from two patients undergoing chemotherapy with imipenem—P1 to P5 from patient P and G1 to G7 from patient G. ATCC15038 was used as a reference strain. MICs were determined by broth microdilution in MHII broth as described in Materials and Methods. For clarity, strains have been classified as R for resistant and S for susceptible. Detailed MICs are presented in supplementary information (S1 Table). Different classes of antibiotics were tested: phenicols (chloramphenicol), quinolones (nalidixic acid, fleroxacin and norfloxacin), macrolides (erythromycin), carbapenems (imipenem and ertapenem), cephalosporins (cefepime, ceftazidime and cefotaxime), tetracycline and polymyxin B. Gentamicin is often the last option to treat MDR strains. For this reasons, we chose not to include this antibiotic in our assays but we refer to MIC values obtained from the healthcare facilities.
a Sampling sites: U, urine; V, vagina; S, Sputum; B, blood; T, trachea.
b The presence of porins and efflux pump proteins were determined immunoblots using specific antibodies directed against Escherichia coli OmpF, OmpC, AcrA, AcrB or TolC.
Patient G was hospitalized in an intensive care unit in a different geographic zone. The first strain of E. aerogenes was isolated from the urinary tract three months after hospitalization. Isolate G1 was susceptible to gentamicin, carbapenems and cephalosporins but resistant to fluoroquinolones. After four weeks of treatment with imipenem, E. aerogenes disappeared from the urinary tract, but reappeared as a MDR strain in the vaginal tract (isolate G2). From that point, treatment was stopped for one month. During this period, isolates G3 and G4 were cultured from sputum and vagina, respectively, and showed a reversion of resistance to carbapenems. Patient G finally received cefpirome for a few days and imipenem for two weeks. Isolates G5 and G6 were cultured from vagina and blood at the end of this period, and both showed similar MDR phenotypes. Three weeks after imipenem treatment was stopped, isolate G7 was cultured from a bronchial aspirate, with a new reversion of susceptibility to carbapenems.
Membrane permeability and efflux activity in the E. aerogenes isolates
Outer membrane porins represent the unique specific route of the uptake of β-lactam antibiotics [16]. Therefore, porin expression levels in the isolates were analyzed by western-blot using antibodies directed against denatured E. coli OmpF and OmpC (data not shown). Reference strains ATCC13048 and ATCC15038 were included as controls, as the former expresses only Omp36 (OmpC) and the latter expresses both Omp36 and Omp35 (OmpF). One cross-reacting band was detected in carbapenem-susceptible strains only. This band was identified as Omp36 by mass spectrometry (S1 Fig and S2 Table).
To examine outer membrane permeability, intact bacterial cells were incubated with H33342. Once H33342 crosses the outer membrane, it diffuses through the inner membrane very rapidly and binds to nucleic acids in the cytoplasm, producing a fluorescent signal. Thus, one can determine the rate-limiting step (i.e. the influx across the outer membrane) from the rate of fluorescence increase. H33342 is a large (> 12 Å across), hydrophobic dye, with delocalized positive charges, thus unlikely able to diffuse through the narrow porin channel. Resuspension of cells in divalent cation-free buffer was expected to destabilize the LPS leaflet of the outer membrane and active efflux was blocked by the presence of the pmf inhibitor CCCP. When H33342 total accumulation levels and entry rates were compared, all strains showed similar permeability, although slightly lower to that of the reference strain ATCC15038 (Fig 1 and S3 Table). This result suggests the absence of major remodeling processes that would account for outer membrane impermeability in the isolates. Nevertheless, it is important to note that this assay does not reflect porin alterations.
A common characteristic of the MDR isolates of E. aerogenes is their high level of resistance towards quinolones (Table 1 and S1 Table). Hence, we used a fluorometric assay based on determination of the time course accumulation of a fluoroquinolone inside the cells to assess efflux [41]. Fig 2 shows the intracellular accumulation of fleroxacin in the E. aerogenes isolates. Higher accumulation was observed in the presence of CCCP, confirming the presence of an active efflux in all the strains. Of note, MDR isolates from patient P—P2, P4 and P5—showed a more than 2-fold accumulation of fleroxacin in the presence of CCCP (Fig 2). However, accumulation levels in the different isolates could not be related to the presence or the absence of outer membrane porins. This could be explained by the fact that membrane permeability plays only a secondary role in quinolone uptake, in sharp contrast to other antibiotics such as β-lactams.
We also used a real-time efflux assay with cells that have been preloaded with the fluorescent dye 1,2'-DNA. Consistently with previous results, isolates from patient P display higher efflux rates in comparison to ATCC15038 and isolates from patient G (with the exceptions of G1 and G5) (Fig 3 and S3 Table).
Genomic features of E. aerogenes G7 and others clinical isolates
In order to identify putative mutations that could account for porin regulation all twelve E. aerogenes isolates were submitted to whole-genome sequencing and mapped to G7, selected as a representative E. aerogenes isolate, as describes in Materials and Methods. The average depth of coverage for the twelve isolates was 388-fold, and over 95% of the newly sequenced and assembled E. aerogenes G7 genome was covered after mapping (Table 2).
Table 2. Summary of genome analysis.
Isolate | P2-P5 | G1 | G2-G6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Coverage (% to the reference strain after mapping) | Chromosome pGPN1 | 98.2 95.1 | 96.6 95.2 | 99.1 95.3 |
Reads (∼ % of mapped) | 85 | 92 | 93 | |
SNPs and InDels | 70–72 | 92 | 7–11 |
The genome of E. aerogenes G7 (EAG7) includes a chromosome of 5,452,368 bp with a GC content of 54.92% and 2 plasmids: a large plasmid of 174,066 bp (pGPN1) and a smaller plasmid of 25,284 bp (pGPN2), from which we only obtained a partial sequence of about 9 Kbp but was likely identical to pNJS258C2 found in a carbapenem-resistant clinical isolate of K. pneumoniae [42] (Fig 4 and S1 Dataset). These two plasmids were present in all the sequenced strains and contained multiple antibiotic resistance markers, including bla TEM-24 on pGPN1 (see S3 Dataset for a complete list). Isolates P2 to P5 have a third plasmid of 34,826 bp similar to pN-Cit found in Citrobacter freundii strain CFSTE [43]. The functional annotation of the chromosome indicates a total of 5,267 predicted coding sequences (CDSs) (Table 3). The G+C content of the EAG7 chromosome is 54.92%, which is in agreement with values previously reported for KCTC2190 (54.8%) [29] and EA1509E (55%) [44]. There were 8 ribosomal operons and 88 transfer RNAs (tRNAs) identified in EAG7, with 87 specific for the biosynthesis of all the 20 standard amino acids and 1 for the selenomethionine biosynthesis, which was identical to those of EA1509E but different from KCTC2190 that carries a total of 109 structural RNAs (Table 3 and S1 Dataset). Regarding the chromosome size, EAG7 resembles the “killer bug” EA1509E, while the strain KCTC2190 presents a smaller chromosome size. This is probably due to the accumulation of genes related to their host-associated life-style and adaptation under anti-microbial selective pressure. The E. aerogenes G7 chromosome also contains four intact prophages, which differ from the genome of E. aerogenes KCTC2190, four IS elements, and one ICE (Table 3, S2 Fig, S1 and S2 Datasets). Multiple genome alignments obtained by progressiveMauve were used to compare the overall genome architecture of EAG7 to that of other strains—including the genomes of the other isolates and the previously published genomes of strains KCTC2190 and EA1509E [29, 44]. Some of these alignments are shown supplementary information (S3 Fig). Overall, the E. aerogenes isolates appeared to be characterized by a low degree of divergence and the genetic synteny among the chromosomes was conserved. The alignment of EAG7 to EA1509E shows the existence of fourteen locally collinear blocks (LCBs) of witch twelve correspond to the chromosome and to the large plasmid pGPN1 (Figure A in S3 Fig). This analysis also indicates that the isolates can be separated into distinct populations. Strains G2 to G7 have syntenic genomes with highly conserved sequences and only one putative rearrangement located on pGPN1 (Figure C in S3 Fig: inversion of LCBs 2 and 3 relative to G7 genome). On the opposite, the genome of G1 exhibits more rearrangements and modifications when compared to that of G7, thus indicating that G1 is more distant to G7 than the other G isolates (Figure B in S3 Fig). These modifications include the absence of three regions of 42–48 Kbp associated with phage functions and nearly 103 Kbp of additional sequences (S2 Fig, S1 and S2 Datasets). Strains P2 to P5 also present genome rearrangements and modifications compared to G7 (Figure E in S3 Fig). Among these, one prophage region of 48 Kbp was absent, around 98 Kbp of supplementary sequences, corresponding to the Imp locus (involved in type VI secretion) and phage functions, and a supplementary plasmid of about 35 Kbp, similar to pN-Cit from C. freundii strain CFSTE (S2 Dataset) were found. ProgressiveMauve plots also show that isolate P1 is clearly distant from all the other isolates but shares a good synteny with the reference strain KCTC2190 (Figure A in S3 Fig). For this reason, isolate P1 was not further studied.
Table 3. Features of the G7 genome.
E. aerogenes G7 * | |
---|---|
Size (bp) | 5,452,368 |
GC content (%) | 54.92 |
CDS (n) | 5,267 |
rRNAs (n) | |
16S | 8 |
23S | 8 |
5S | 9 |
tRNAs (n) | 87 |
Plasmids (n) | 2 |
Prophages (n) | 8 |
PhageG7.1 | Intact |
PhageG7.2 | Intact |
PhageG7.3 | Questionable |
PhageG7.4 | Intact |
PhageG7.5 | Incomplete |
PhageG7.6 | Questionable |
PhageG7.7 | Intact |
PhageG7.8 | Questionable |
ICEs (n) | 1 |
IS elements (n) | 4 |
IS5075 | 3 |
IS1351 | 1 |
Comparative genomics between the clinical isolates and identification of mutations associated to MDR
Comparative genome sequencing of all twelve isolates pointed to several mutations (see S2 Dataset for a complete list of SNPs and InDels). Total, we found 70–72 and 9–11 mutations in the genome of isolates P2-P5 and G2-G6, as compared to that of G7, respectively. These values confirm that the isolates are closely related. Interestingly, only a few numbers of non-synonymous mutations were specifically present in the core genome of MDR isolates. The QRDRs in all twelve isolates, including gyrA, gyrB, parC and parE genes, contained several amino acid substitutions (Ser67Ala and Thr83Ile in GyrA and Ser80Ile in ParC for isolates P2-P5 and G1; Thr83Ile and Asp87Asn in GyrA and Ser80Ile in ParC for isolates G2-G7), when sequences were compared to that of KCTC2190. These mutations likely explain quinolone resistance in theses isolates (Table 1 and S1 Table). Additional mutations mapped to 6 loci that are known to control outer membrane permeability. Frameshift mutations introducing stop codons in the structural gene of Omp36 were systematically identified in all MDR isolates—P2, P4, P5, G2, G5 and G6. Isolate G2 also carried a mutation in the structural gene of Omp35. Isolates P4-P5 and G5 contained non-synonymous mutations in regulatory genes: P4 and P5 were mutated in cpxA (generating a Tyr144Asn substitution); an intergenic mutation between cpxP and cpxRA was found in P5; G5 was mutated in rob (generating a Gly140Ser substitution), phoQ (generating a Leu348Gln substitution) and pmrB (generating a Thr157Pro substitution). Rob is a global transcription factor of the AraC/XylS family. MarA, SoxS and Rob have been shown to function in co-operative manner to induce MDR in response to a variety of external stresses [45, 46]. CpxA, PhoQ and PmrB (BasS) are sensor kinases of the CpxRA, PhoPQ and PmrB (BasRS) two-component regulatory systems, respectively. The CpxRA two-component system has been extensively studied and reported as a major pathway for outer membrane stress response [47]. Notably, activation of CpxRA down regulates the expression of outer membrane proteins [48]. On the other hand, PhoPQ and PmrAB two-component systems control the expression of LPS-modifying enzymes [49, 50]. These data now offer a unique opportunity to study the influence of two-component regulatory systems on outer membrane permeability, including porin expression and LPS modification, and MDR phenotypes in clinical isolates. Nonetheless, the observation that these mutations appeared during imipenem chemotherapy in parallel with the emergence of carbapenem-resistance strongly suggests that they provide an adaptive response to the antibiotic stress.
Discussion
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae are considered as an urgent threat worldwide. A first step to combat this threat is to understand the genomic traits of resistant clinical isolates as a mean to get new insight into their successful adaptation as nosocomial pathogens. It is also important to consider the genome evolution of clinical strains isolated from patients at timed intervals during antibiotic treatments. Herein, we performed whole genome sequencing (WGS) on a total of twelve clinical strains of E. aerogenes isolated from two patients treated with imipenem and showing variable MDR phenotypes. We have thoroughly mined the genome of the imipenem-susceptible EAG7. Of note, as EA1509E and EAG7 both belong to a same epidemic clone, we now have access to two completely determined and closed genomes of E. aerogenes representatives involved in large hospital outbreaks in France. The genome of EAG7 is composed of one chromosome and two plasmids of different sizes. It contains multiple resistance markers, including β-lactamases and efflux pumps, which can contribute to the successful adaptation of this strain to the hospital environment. WGS of the twelve isolates followed by comparative genomics using EAG7 as a reference allowed us to determine the genome evolution of the strains in the patient host and identify putative mutations responsible for MDR (S2 and S3 Datasets). For patient P, isolate P1, which was found closely related to KCTC2190, disappeared rapidly after the first use of imipenem. Analysis of SNPs in the P2-P5 isolates rather suggests the co-existence of an imipenem-susceptible ancestor resembling P3. Then, constant exposure to antibiotic stress during the whole period of treatment fixed mutations that occurred in a stepwise manner in this population in strict correlation with the acquisition of new phenotypic resistances (Fig 5A). Likewise, isolate G1 did not evolve during antibiotic treatment, suggesting the co-existence of an imipenem-susceptible ancestor that subsequently yielded G2-G7. However, one cannot rule out the possibility of an exogenous infection. For patient G, discontinuity of the treatment lead to several genotypes associated to MDR as well as genotypic-phenotypic reversions (Fig 5B). Notably, periods of imipenem treatment induced porin-loss concomitant to carbapenem-resistance.
In this study, we used different assays to analyze and correlate the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of two series of E. aerogenes clinical isolates. We found no mutation in the mar, ram or sox region that could differentiate G7 from the other isolates. Only isolate G5 has a single base pair exchange in rob that generates the amino acid substitution Gly140Ser in Rob. Previous results from an heterogeneous collection of our clinical isolates showed the presence of multiple but conserved mutations in both ramA and ramR, when sequences were compared to that of the reference strains ATCC15038 and ATCC13048 (A. Molitor, A.V. Davin-Régli and J. M. Pagès, unpublished data). Isolates G6 and P2 were part of this collection. All had a 5 bp deletion upstream of ramA, between the marbox and the translational start; 3 bp exchanges that generated 3 amino acid substitutions (Ala72Asp, Pro100Ser and Ile121Ser) and a frameshift mutation that altered and shortened the C-terminus of RamR. Interestingly, q-PCR analysis also showed these three isolates had increased levels of ramA and acrA transcripts, together with decreased levels of omp35 transcripts, in comparison to the reference strains. However, the impact of the mutated ramA or ramR on MDR and efflux pumps expression has not been tested.
Our data suggest that both reduced outer membrane permeability and expression of β-lactamases, but not efflux, are the main contributors of MDR in these isolates. Indeed, a previous study showed that all twelve isolates belong to a prevalent epidemiologic clone that contains a plasmid encoding a TEM-24 ESBL [7]. Moreover, the presence of an inducible chromosomal AmpC β-lactamase has been detected in the isolates, with the exception of G1 (data not shown). These data were confirmed by WGS and likely explain the high resistance levels to cephalosporins even in the presence of a β-lactamase inhibitor (i.e. TEM-24 but not AmpC is inhibited by clavulanic acid) (S1 Table). Here, it is also worth to note that the bla TEM-24 gene located on pGPN1 is flanked sequences of ISSwi1, thus could be subject to duplication by recombination between regions of homology (S1 Dataset). Gene duplications are relevant to the evolution of resistance in that these events are frequent and instable.
High resistance levels to quinolones are generally due to increased efflux activity and/or target mutations. Here, active efflux has been detected in all the isolates using fluorimetric assays (Figs 2 and 3). However, the use efflux inhibitors such as PAβN or NMP did not restore susceptibility to quinolones but only that of erythromycin (S1 Table). This strongly suggests the presence of mutations in QRDRs of DNA gyrase and/or topoisomerase IV subunits.
Although all the isolates produce β-lactamases, resistance to carbapenems is exclusively related to the loss of Omp36. Consistently, susceptibility to β-lactams can only be restored by the addition of PMBN, a derivative of polymyxin B that increases outer membrane permeability and facilitates antibiotic permeation (S1 Table). The absence or the decreased expression of the two major porins (OmpF and OmpC in E. coli, Omp35 and Omp36 in E. aerogenes or OmpK35 and OmpK36 in K. pneumoniae) in combination with the presence of β-lactamases has been previously implicated in carbapenem-resistance [4, 6–10, 23, 51]. Here, we found that none of the clinical isolates expressed Omp35 while Omp36 was only expressed in the carbapenem-susceptible strains. WGS data were used to investigate the basis of porin loss. In all cases, the loss of Omp36 resulted from frameshift mutations in the coding sequence leading to a premature translational stop. In contrast, the loss of Omp35 is less clear, with the exception of isolate G2 in which omp35 is inactivated by a frameshift mutation (S2 and S3 Datasets). We suspect molecular mechanisms working at the transcriptional or post-transcriptional level or preventing porin insertion into the outer membrane. Part of this question will be addressed by transcriptomic analysis.
Special attention will also be given to missense mutations that were identified in three different sensor kinase two-component regulatory systems—cpxA in isolates P4-P5, and phoQ and pmrB in isolate G5. Such mutations are not uncommon in bacteria and have been linked to antimicrobial resistance [52–58]. Mutations in the cpxA have been shown to contribute to amikacin and cephalosporin resistance in E. coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, respectively [52]. Mutations in phoQ and pmrB have been identified in multiple pathogens including S. enterica, P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae [53–58]. These two-component systems control the expression of genes linked to LPS modification and promote resistance to polycationic antimicrobials, including polymyxins and antimicrobial peptides. Consistently, we observed that isolate G5 shows high resistance level to polymyxin B (S1 Table). Future works will aim to study the role of two-component systems in antibiotic resistance and examine these systems as potential targets for the development of drugs to potentate uptake and activity of existing antibiotics.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank David Cornu and Leila Sago (Plateforme SICaPS, CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette) for mass spectrometry analysis.
Data Availability
The genome of EAG7 has been deposited in GenBank under National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) accession numbers CP011539 (chromosome) and CP011540 (plasmid pGPN1). Metadata for comparative genomics were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession SRP056584 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra/sra.cgi?view=announcement).
Funding Statement
The research leading to these results was conducted as part of the TRANSLOCATION consortium and has received support from the Innovative Medicines Initiatives Joint Undertaking under Grant Agreement n°115525, resources which are composed of financial contribution from the European Union’s seventh framework program (FP7/2007-2013) and EFPIA companies in kind contribution. This work was also supported by Aix-Marseille Université and Service de Santé des Armées. The authorhs assert that the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.CDC. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2013. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf.
- 2. Arpin C, Coze C, Rogues AM, Gachie JP, Bebear C, Quentin C. 1996. Epidemiological study of an outbreak due to multidrug-resistant Enterobacter aerogenes in a medical intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol. 34: 2163–2169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Davin-Regli A, Monnet D, Saux P, Bosi C, Charrel R, Barthelemy A, et al. 1996. Molecular epidemiology of Enterobacter aerogenes acquisition: one-year prospective study in two intensive care units. J Clin Microbiol. 34: 1474–1480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bosi C, Davin-Regli A, Bornet C, Mallea M, Pages JM, Bollet C. 1999. Most Enterobacter aerogenes strains in France belong to a prevalent clone. J Clin Microbiol. 37: 2165–2169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. de Champs C, Henquell C, Guelon D, Sirot D, Gazuy N, Sirot J. 1993. Clinical and bacteriological study of nosocomial infections due to Enterobacter aerogenes resistant to imipenem. J Clin Microbiol. 31: 123–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Charrel RN, Pagès JM, De Micco P, Mallea M. 1996. Prevalence of outer membrane porin alteration in β-lactam-antibiotic-resistant Enterobacter aerogenes . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 40: 2854–2858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bornet C, Davin-Regli A, Bosi C, Pages JM, Bollet C. 2000. Imipenem resistance of Enterobacter aerogenes mediated by outer membrane permeability. J Clin Microbiol. 38: 1048–1052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Thiolas A, Bollet C, La Scola B, Raoult D, Pagès JM. 2005. Successive emergence of Enterobacter aerogenes strains resistant to imipenem and colistin in a patient. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 49: 1354–1358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lavigne JP, Sotto A, Nicolas-Chanoine MH, Bouziges N, Bourg G, Davin-Regli A, et al. 2012. Membrane permeability, a pivotal function involved in antibiotic resistance and virulence in Enterobacter aerogenes clinical isolates. Clin Microbiol Infect. 18: 539–545. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03607.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lavigne JP, Sotto A, Nicolas-Chanoine MH, Bouziges N, Pagès JM, Davin-Regli A. 2013. An adaptive response of Enterobacter aerogenes to imipenem: regulation of porin balance in clinical isolates. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 41: 130–136. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.10.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lavigne JP, Bouziges N, Chanal C, Mahamat A, Michaux-Charachon S, Sotto A. Molecular epidemiology of Enterobacteriaceae isolates producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in a French hospital. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42:3805–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Tran QT, Dupont M, Lavigne JP, Chevalier J, Pagès JM, Sotto A, et al. Occurrence of efflux mechanism and cephalosporinase variant in a population of Enterobacter aerogenes and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009; 53:1652–6. 10.1128/AAC.00822-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Nordmann P, Poirel L, Walsh TR, Livermore DM. The emerging NDM carbapenemases. Trends Microbiol. 2011; 19:588–95. 10.1016/j.tim.2011.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Robert J, Pantel A, Mérens A, Lavigne JP, Nicolas-Chanoine MH; ONERBA's Carbapenem Resistance Study Group. 2014. Incidence rates of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates in France: a prospective nationwide study in 2011–12. J Antimicrob Chemother. 69: 2706–2712. 10.1093/jac/dku208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Davin-Regli A, Bolla JM, James CE, Lavigne JP, Chevalier J, Garnotel E, et al. 2008. Membrane permeability and regulation of drug "influx and efflux" in enterobacterial pathogens. Curr Drug Targets. 9: 750–759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Pagès JM, James CE, Winterhalter M. 2008. The porin and the permeating antibiotic: a selective diffusion barrier in Gram-negative bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 6:893–903. 10.1038/nrmicro1994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Nikaido H, Pagès JM. 2012. Broad-specificity efflux pumps and their role in multidrug resistance of Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 36: 340–363. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00290.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Mallea M, Chevalier J, Bornet C, Eyraud A, Davin-Regli A, Bollet C, et al. 1998. Porin alteration and active efflux: two in vivo drug resistance strategies used by Enterobacter aerogenes . Microbiology. 144: 3003–3009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Dé E, Baslé A, Jaquinod M, Saint N, Malléa M, Molle G, Pagès JM. 2001. A new mechanism of antibiotic resistance in Enterobacteriaceae induced by a structural modification of the major porin. Mol Microbiol. 41: 189–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Thiolas A, Bornet C, Davin-Régli A, Pagès JM, Bollet C. 2004. Resistance to imipenem, cefepime, and cefpirome associated with mutation in Omp36 osmoporin of Enterobacter aerogenes . Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 317: 851–856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Bornet C, Chollet R, Malléa M, Chevalier J, Davin-Regli A, Pagès JM, et al. 2003. Imipenem and expression of multidrug efflux pump in Enterobacter aerogenes . Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 301: 985–990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Chevalier J, Mulfinger C, Garnotel E, Nicolas P, Davin-Régli A, Pagès JM. 2008. Identification and evolution of drug efflux pump in clinical Enterobacter aerogenes strains isolated in 1995 and 2003. PLoS One. 3: e3203 10.1371/journal.pone.0003203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Doumith M, Ellington MJ, Livermore DM, Woodford N. 2009. Molecular mechanisms disrupting porin expression in ertapenem-resistant Klebsiella and Enterobacter spp. clinical isolates from the UK. J Antimicrob Chemother. 63: 659–667. 10.1093/jac/dkp029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Schneiders T, Amyes SG, Levy SB. 2003. Role of acrR and ramA in fluoroquinolone resistance in clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from Singapore. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 47: 2831–2837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Koutsolioutsou A, Peña-Llopis S, Demple B. 2005. Constitutive soxR mutations contribute to multiple-antibiotic resistance in clinical Escherichia coli isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 49: 2746–2752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Abouzeed YM, Baucheron S, Cloeckaert A. 2008. ramR mutations involved in efflux-mediated multidrug resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 52: 2428–2434. 10.1128/AAC.00084-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Zheng J, Cui S, Meng J. 2009. Effect of transcriptional activators RamA and SoxS on expression of multidrug efflux pumps AcrAB and AcrEF in fluoroquinolone-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium. J Antimicrob Chemother. 63: 95–102. 10.1093/jac/dkn448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Blair JM, Bavro VN, Ricci V, Modi N, Cacciotto P, Kleinekathӧfer U, et al. 2015. AcrB drug-binding pocket substitution confers clinically relevant resistance and altered substrate specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 112:3511–3516. 10.1073/pnas.1419939112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Shin SH, Kim S, Kim JY, Lee S, Um Y, Oh MK, et al. 2012. Complete genome sequence of Enterobacter aerogenes KCTC 2190. J Bacteriol. 194: 2373–2374. 10.1128/JB.00028-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Bohnert JA, Schuster S, Szymaniak-Vits M, Kern WV. 2011. Determination of real-time efflux phenotypes in Escherichia coli AcrB binding pocket phenylalanine mutants using a 1,2'-dinaphthylamine efflux assay. PLoS One. 6: e21196 10.1371/journal.pone.0021196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Salzberg SL, Delcher AL, Kasif S, White O. 1998. Microbial gene identification using interpolated Markov models. Nucleic Acids Res. 26: 544–548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, et al. 2008. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 9:75 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, et al. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res. 42: D206–214. 10.1093/nar/gkt1226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 25: 1754–1760. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Milne I, Stephen G, Bayer M, Cock PJ, Pritchard L, Cardle L, et al. 2013. Using Tablet for visual exploration of second-generation sequencing data. Brief Bioinform. 14: 193–202. 10.1093/bib/bbs012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18: 821–829. 10.1101/gr.074492.107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. 2010. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One. 5: e11147 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 215: 403–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Zhou Y, Liang Y, Lynch KH, Dennis JJ, Wishart DS. 2011. PHAST: a fast phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 39: W347–352. 10.1093/nar/gkr485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Siguier P, Perochon J, Lestrade L, Mahillon J, Chandler M. 2006. ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 34: D32–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Chapman JS, Georgopapadakou NH. 1989. Fluorometric assay for fleroxacin uptake by bacterial cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 33: 27–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Deleo FR, Chen L, Porcella SF, Martens CA, Kobayashi SD, Porter AR, et al. 2014. Molecular dissection of the evolution of carbapenem-resistant multilocus sequence type 258 Klebsiella pneumoniae . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111: 4988–4993. 10.1073/pnas.1321364111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Villa L, Carattoli A, Nordmann P, Carta C, Poirel L. 2013. Complete sequence of the IncT-type plasmid pT-OXA-181 carrying the bla OXA-181 carbapenemase gene from Citrobacter freundii . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 57: 1965–1967. 10.1128/AAC.01297-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Diene SM, Merhej V, Henry M, El Filali A, Roux V, Robert C, et al. 2013. The rhizome of the multidrug-resistant Enterobacter aerogenes genome reveals how new "killer bugs" are created because of a sympatric lifestyle. Mol Biol Evol. 30: 369–383. 10.1093/molbev/mss236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Lee EH, Collatz E, Podglajen I, Gutmann L. 1996. A rob-like gene of Enterobacter cloacae affecting porin synthesis and susceptibility to multiple antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 40: 2029–2033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Pérez A, Poza M, Aranda J, Latasa C, Medrano FJ, Tomás M, et al. 2012. Effect of transcriptional activators SoxS, RobA, and RamA on expression of multidrug efflux pump AcrAB-TolC in Enterobacter cloacae . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 56: 6256–6266. 10.1128/AAC.01085-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Raivio TL. 2014. Everything old is new again: an update on current research on the Cpx envelope stress response. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1843: 1529–1541. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Batchelor E, Walthers D, Kenney LJ, Goulian M. 2005. The Escherichia coli CpxA-CpxR envelope stress response system regulates expression of the porins ompF and ompC . J Bacteriol. 187: 5723–5731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Groisman EA. 2001. The pleiotropic two-component regulatory system PhoP-PhoQ. J Bacteriol. 183: 1835–1842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Chen HD, Groisman EA. 2013. The biology of the PmrA/PmrB two-component system: the major regulator of lipopolysaccharide modifications. Annu Rev Microbiol. 67: 83–112. 10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Tsai YK, Liou CH, Fung CP, Lin JC, Siu LK. 2013. Single or in combination antimicrobial resistance mechanisms of Klebsiella pneumoniae contribute to varied susceptibility to different carbapenems. PLoS One. 8: e79640 10.1371/journal.pone.0079640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Mahoney TF, Silhavy TJ. 2013. The Cpx stress response confers resistance to some, but not all, bactericidal antibiotics. J Bacteriol. 195: 1869–1874. 10.1128/JB.02197-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Barrow K, Kwon DH. 2009. Alterations in two-component regulatory systems of PhoPQ and PmrAB are associated with polymyxin B resistance in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 53: 5150–514. 10.1128/AAC.00893-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Sun S, Negrea A, Rhen M, Andersson DI. 2009. Genetic analysis of colistin resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 53: 2298–2305. 10.1128/AAC.01016-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Miller AK, Brannon MK, Stevens L, Johansen HK, Selgrade SE, Miller SI, et al. 2011. phoQ mutations promote lipid A modification and polymyxin resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa found in colistin-treated cystic fibrosis patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 55: 5761–5769. 10.1128/AAC.05391-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Moskowitz SM, Brannon MK, Dasgupta N, Pier M, Sgambati N, Miller AK, et al. 2012. PmrB mutations promote polymyxin resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from colistin-treated cystic fibrosis patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 56: 1019–1030. 10.1128/AAC.05829-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Jayol A, Poirel L, Brink A, Villegas MV, Yilmaz M, Nordmann P. 2014. Resistance to colistin associated with a single amino acid change in protein PmrB among Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates of worldwide origin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 58: 4762–4766. 10.1128/AAC.00084-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Shprung T, Peleg A, Rosenfeld Y, Trieu-Cuot P, Shai Y. 2012. Effect of PhoP-PhoQ activation by broad repertoire of antimicrobial peptides on bacterial resistance. J Biol Chem. 287: 4544–4551. 10.1074/jbc.M111.278523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The genome of EAG7 has been deposited in GenBank under National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) accession numbers CP011539 (chromosome) and CP011540 (plasmid pGPN1). Metadata for comparative genomics were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession SRP056584 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra/sra.cgi?view=announcement).