Skip to main content
Extreme Physiology & Medicine logoLink to Extreme Physiology & Medicine
. 2015 Sep 14;4(Suppl 1):A71. doi: 10.1186/2046-7648-4-S1-A71

Thermal effects of headgear: state-of-the-art and way forward

Cornelis C Bogerd 1,, Jean-Marie Aerts 2, Simon Annaheim 3, Peter Bröde 4, Guido de Bruyne 5, Andreas D Flouris 6, Kalev Kuklane 7, Tiago Sotto Mayor 3, René M Rossi 3; TU1101 WG4 Action COST8
PMCID: PMC4580834

Introduction

Headgear is widely used in both work and leisure. Much research attention has been spent on optimizing impact properties of helmets [1], [2]. However, thermal comfort of headgear is suboptimal in neutral and warm environments. In fact, thermal discomfort is often given as a reason to not wear protective headgear [3], [4]. Enhanced thermal comfort of headgear is likely to improve the willingness to wear protective headgear, and motivated an increasing number of studies, of which most were published in the last decade. The available body of literature allows for a valuable first review on the thermal effects of headgear.

Methods

The literature on thermal effects of headgear was reviewed for the purpose of providing a sound basis for improving helmet design, and for effective future studies.

Results

Four topics will be addressed: (i) the effect on thermal physiology, health and performance, (ii) heat and mass transfer, (iii) methods for studying thermal effects of headgear, (iv) design considerations (Bogerd et al., 2015). Several topics will be detailed by other contributions to this conference from COST Action TU1101, which enhances the accessibility of the subject on ergonomics of headgear for the audience of this conference.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to our colleagues from COST Action TU1101 "Towards safer bicycling through optimization of bicycle helmets and usage" for fruitful collaboration and discussions. COST is supported by the EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020.

References

  1. Deck C, Willinger R. Multi-directional optimisation against biomechanical criteria of a head-helmet coupling. Int J Crashworthiness. 2006;11:561–572. doi: 10.1533/ijcr.2006.0149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mills N, Gilchrist A. Oblique impact testing of bicycle helmets. Int J Impact Eng. 2008;35:1075–1086. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.05.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Orsi C, Stendardo A, Marinoni A, Gilchrist MD, Otte D, Chliaoutakis J, Lajunen T, Özkan T, Pereira JD, Tzamalouka G, Morandi A. Motorcycle riders' perception of helmet use: Complaints and dissatisfaction. Accid Anal Prev. 2012;44:111–117. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.029. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Patel R, Mohan D. An improved motorcycle helmet design for tropical climates. Appl Ergon. 1993;24:427–431. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(93)90175-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bogerd CP, Aerts JM, Annaheim S, Bröde P, de Bruyne G, Flouris AD, Kuklane K, Sotto Mayor T, Rossi RM. A review on ergonomics of headgear: Thermal effects. Int J Ind Ergon. 2015;45:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2014.10.004. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Extreme Physiology & Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES