Abstract
Background: Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) is linked to greater cardiometabolic risk in adults. Although longitudinal evidence is sparse among children, SSB intake reduction is targeted to reduce cardiometabolic risk factors in this group.
Objective: We investigated characteristics associated with consumption of SSBs in a multi-ethnic sample of children/adolescents and measured cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between SSB intake and plasma HDL cholesterol and triglycerides (TGs) over 12 mo.
Methods: In a diverse cohort of children aged 8–15 y, cross-sectional associations (n = 613) between baseline SSB intake and blood lipid concentrations and longitudinal associations (n = 380) between mean SSB intake, changes in SSB intake, and lipid changes over 12 mo were assessed with multivariable linear regression.
Results: Greater SSB intake was associated with lower socioeconomic status, higher total energy intake, lower fruit/vegetable intake, and more sedentary time. In cross-sectional analysis, greater SSB intake was associated with higher plasma TG concentrations among consumers (62.4, 65.3, and 71.6 mg/dL in children who consumed >0 but <2, ≥2 but <7, and ≥7 servings/wk, respectively; P-trend: 0.03); plasma HDL cholesterol showed no cross-sectional association. In the longitudinal analysis, mean SSB intake over 12 mo was not associated with lipid changes; however, the 12-mo increase in plasma HDL-cholesterol concentration was greater among children who decreased their intake by ≥1 serving/wk (4.6 ± 0.8 mg/dL) compared with children whose intake stayed the same (2.0 ± 0.8 mg/dL) or increased (1.5 ± 0.8 mg/dL; P = 0.02).
Conclusions: In a multi-ethnic sample of children, intake of SSBs was positively associated with TG concentrations among consumers, and changes in SSB intake were inversely associated with HDL cholesterol concentration changes over 12 mo. Further research in large diverse samples of children is needed to study the public health implications of reducing SSB intake among children of different racial/ethnic groups. The Daily D Health Study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01537809.
Keywords: dyslipidemias, sweetening agents, ethnic groups, health status disparities, child
Introduction
The impact of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake on obesity and development of other cardiometabolic risk factors in children, including dyslipidemia and insulin resistance, has received considerable attention (1–3). In 2009–2010, SSBs were the main source of added sugars in children’s diets, accounting for as much as 8% of total energy intake among US children/adolescents aged 2–19 y (4). Aside from promoting energy imbalance and poor diet quality (5, 6), SSB intake is linked to development of dyslipidemia through ectopic fat accumulation, de novo lipogenesis, visceral adiposity, and hypertriglyceridemia (7–9). In combination with low HDL cholesterol and obesity, high TG concentrations in children characterize a dyslipidemia associated with cardiometabolic risk (10).
Although a decrease in overall SSB intake in the United States was detected recently (4, 11), prevalence of SSB consumption has tended to be higher among some children, particularly children with lower socioeconomic status (SES) (12) and racial/ethnic minorities, including non-Hispanic black individuals (13). Consumption of SSBs among children is particularly concerning because dietary habits in childhood track into adulthood (14), potentially contributing years of exposure. To date, few longitudinal studies conducted on SSBs or added sugar intake in children/adolescents have examined the role of SSB consumption on changes in cardiometabolic risk factors such as blood lipids over time (1, 15).
Given that socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differences were reported in consumption of SSBs and cardiometabolic risk factors and that adverse effects of SSBs may be strongest in children (16), it is important to investigate the relation between SSB intake and dyslipidemia measures in large, socioeconomically and racially/ethnically diverse samples of children. Our overall aims were to investigate characteristics associated with SSB consumption in a multi-ethnic sample of children/adolescents and to measure associations between SSB intake and dyslipidemia, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally over 12 mo. For the cross-sectional analyses, associations between SSB intake at baseline and plasma HDL-cholesterol and TG concentrations were measured. In conducting the longitudinal analyses, the following 2 research questions were addressed: 1) the relation between mean SSB intake over 12 mo and changes in HDL cholesterol and TGs and 2) the relation between changes in SSB intake and changes in HDL cholesterol and TGs over 12 mo.
Methods
Study population.
Secondary analyses were conducted with the use of data from children enrolled in a randomized, double-blind vitamin D supplementation trial, the Daily D Health Study. Details on study methodology are presented elsewhere (17). Briefly, in the fall of 2011 and 2012, 690 children aged 8–15 y in Boston area schools were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 doses of vitamin D3 daily for 6 mo, with an additional follow-up at 12 mo; the primary outcome was serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and secondary outcomes were blood lipids and glucose. The study protocol and documents were approved by Tufts University’s Institutional Review Board, and parental informed consent and the child’s assent were obtained. The sample was predominantly non-white/Caucasian (41% white/Caucasian, 15% black/African American, 22% Hispanic/Latino, 8% Asian, and 14% multi-racial/other), 68% were from low SES households (assessed through the proxy measure eligibility for free or reduced-price school meals), and 47% were overweight/obese [≥85th BMI (in kg/m2) percentile].
Measurements and variables.
Dietary intake was measured with the 2004 Block FFQ for Children (NutritionQuest), a semiquantitative instrument that inquires about the frequency and portion size of consumption of 72 food and beverage line items and 6 clarification questions on food types, over the past week (i.e., past 7 d), as a proxy for usual intake (18, 19). Children self-reported their intake with the use of the FFQ, which inquired about the number of days in the past week (none, 1, 2, 3–4, 5–6, or 7) they consumed each beverage type; the number of bottles, cans, glasses, or juice boxes; and the size of soda [12 ounce (370 g) can, 20 ounce (615 g) bottle, or >20 ounces] consumed at each occasion. SSBs included regular sodas, non-100% fruit juices/drinks, and other beverages such as sweetened teas. The FFQ was completed by children at baseline and at 6 and 12 mo, and data collected were analyzed and translated into daily intakes of foods, beverages, nutrients, and energy by NutritionQuest. With the use of previously defined cutoffs for implausible energy intakes among children/adolescents (20), FFQ data were excluded from analysis if total energy intake was <500 or >5000 kcal/d (baseline, n = 67; 6 mo, n = 66; 12 mo, n = 59). Further exclusion criteria included having diabetes (n = 4) or missing baseline or 12-mo data on SSBs (baseline, n = 5; 12 mo, n = 11) or blood lipids (baseline, n = 1; 12 mo, n = 10). The final sample size for the cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses were 613 and 380, respectively.
SSB intake data were originally provided as daily kilocalories from SSBs, and to convert to servings per day a serving was defined as 150 kcal for an ∼12-oz (370 g) can or bottle (21). We multiplied daily SSB servings by 7 to convert to weekly servings. For cross-sectional analyses, we created a 4-level categorical variable for baseline SSB intake data: non-consumer (i.e., zero reported SSB intake at baseline, n = 92), >0 but <2 servings/wk, ≥2 but <7 servings/wk, and ≥7 servings/wk; the SSB consumption groups represent approximately once-weekly, every-other-day, and daily consumption of SSBs and closely follow the frequency categories provided on the FFQ. In the longitudinal analyses, categorical SSB variables were created for each research question. For the first longitudinal research question, the mean of the reported weekly servings of SSBs at baseline, 6 mo, and 12 mo was calculated to estimate mean SSB intake over 12 mo, and then each child was classified into the defined categories as described above. The non-consumer category represented children who reported zero consumption of SSBs at all time points (n = 13). To calculate change in SSB intake between baseline and 12 mo, we subtracted the estimated weekly servings of SSBs at baseline from estimated weekly servings of SSBs at 12 mo. Change in SSB intake was then categorized as ≥1 serving/wk decrease, approximately no change, and ≥1 serving/wk increase in SSBs. Lipid changes were calculated by subtracting the baseline lipid concentration from the 12-mo concentration. Because distributions of lipid changes between baseline and 12 mo showed outliers, before performing statistical testing, 5 data points were winsorized (22) by identifying those that were >2 SDs from the remainder of the distribution and substituting them with the next closest data point.
Blood was collected after an overnight fast and used to measure plasma HDL cholesterol and TGs. The determination of TG and HDL-cholesterol concentrations was simultaneously performed on the Hitachi 917 analyzer with the use of reagents and calibrators from Roche Diagnostics in a laboratory certified by the CDC/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Lipid Standardization Program. Height and weight were directly measured by study personnel with the use of standard procedures (17). BMI was calculated and converted into a percentile and z score according to the CDC age- and sex-specific growth charts (23).
Parents reported SES and their child’s race/ethnicity via questionnaire, as reported previously (17). Physical activity was assessed with the Block Kids Physical Activity Screener (NutritionQuest). The question capturing screen time from television, video games, and Internet was used as a proxy measure of sedentary time and dichotomized at <4 or ≥4 h/d. Children assessed their pubertal status by completing a brief pubertal questionnaire designed and validated for this age group (24), which inquired whether menarche was reached (for girls) or voices had changed (for boys) (25); an affirmative response to these questions was classified as late/after puberty, in comparison with before/early/mid-puberty.
Statistical analysis.
Statistical analyses were conducted with SAS 9.3 software (SAS Institute Inc.), with 2-tailed tests and P < 0.05 representing statistical significance. To compare characteristics of children associated with category of SSB consumption in the cross-sectional and longitudinal study samples, baseline continuous data were compared across the 4 SSB intake categories with the use of ANCOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis test for variables with normal or skewed distributions, respectively, and proportions with the use of Pearson’s chi-square test. Values in the text and Table 1 are means ± SDs for normally distributed continuous variables, medians ± IQRs for continuous variables with skewed distributions, or percentages. Dietary intake data were energy-adjusted with the residual method before computing means ± SDs by SSB category; for the longitudinal study, mean intakes over the 12 mo of total energy and energy-adjusted fruits/vegetables and discretionary solid fats are provided in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Cross-sectional study, baseline SSB intake category |
Longitudinal study, baseline to 12 mo, mean SSB intake category2 |
|||||||||
Characteristic | Non-consumer | >0 to <2 svg/wk | ≥2 to <7 svg/wk | ≥7 svg/wk | P3 | Non-consumer | >0 to <2 svg/wk | ≥2 to <7 svg/wk | ≥7 svg/wk | P3 |
n | 92 | 168 | 244 | 109 | — | 13 | 135 | 186 | 46 | — |
SSB, svg/wk | ||||||||||
Median | 0 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 11.6 | — | 0 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 10.6 | — |
Range | 0 | 0.68–1.92 | 2.02–6.81 | 7.04–34.98 | — | 0 | 0.23–1.99 | 2.01–6.98 | 7.31–24.78 | — |
Age, y | 11.5 ± 1.3 | 11.5 ± 1.4 | 11.9 ± 1.4 | 11.9 ± 1.5 | 0.007 | 11.2 ± 1.4 | 11.1 ± 1.3 | 11.2 ± 1.5 | 11.5 ± 1.4 | 0.55 |
Female, % | 63.0 | 45.2 | 53.3 | 50.5 | 0.05 | 69.2 | 48.2 | 51.6 | 50.0 | 0.53 |
Race/ethnicity, % | 0.15 | 0.20 | ||||||||
White/Caucasian | 50.0 | 36.9 | 45.1 | 33.0 | 69.2 | 46.7 | 43.6 | 39.1 | ||
Black/African American | 12.0 | 13.1 | 16.0 | 17.4 | 0 | 9.6 | 15.1 | 17.4 | ||
Hispanic/Latino | 14.1 | 26.8 | 18.0 | 26.6 | 15.4 | 20.7 | 15.1 | 26.1 | ||
Asian | 10.9 | 10.1 | 7.0 | 6.4 | 0 | 11.9 | 9.7 | 2.2 | ||
Multi-racial/Other | 13.0 | 13.1 | 13.9 | 16.5 | 15.4 | 11.1 | 16.7 | 15.2 | ||
BMI z score | 0.87 ± 1.7 | 0.81 ± 1.8 | 0.90 ± 1.5 | 0.84 ± 1.6 | 0.93 | 1.1 ± 1.7 | 0.84 ± 1.7 | 0.84 ± 1.6 | 0.70 ± 1.9 | 0.59 |
Late/after puberty, % | 26.1 | 29.8 | 39.3 | 46.8 | 0.004 | 23.1 | 27.4 | 36.6 | 39.1 | 0.23 |
Sedentary ≥4 h/d, % | 14.1 | 10.7 | 16.8 | 22.9 | 0.05 | 0 | 12.6 | 15.1 | 32.6 | 0.004 |
Eligible for free or reduced-price school meals, % | 51.1 | 64.9 | 68.4 | 81.7 | <0.0001 | 23.1 | 58.5 | 65.6 | 87.0 | <0.0001 |
Total energy, kcal/d | 1025 ± 583 | 1098 ± 663 | 1339 ± 663 | 1962 ± 1553 | <0.0001 | 1021 ± 360 | 1042 ± 404 | 1315 ± 590 | 1799 ± 1078 | <0.0001 |
Fruits/vegetables, svg/d | 3.0 ± 1.5 | 2.7 ± 1.4 | 2.3 ± 1.3 | 1.9 ± 1.7 | <0.0001 | 3.0 ± 1.4 | 2.4 ± 1.2 | 2.2 ± 1.1 | 1.7 ± 0.9 | 0.0003 |
Discretionary solid fats, g/d | 27.4 ± 7.1 | 27.9 ± 6.3 | 28.0 ± 7.1 | 25.3 ± 9.2 | 0.01 | 23.6 ± 6.5 | 26.4 ± 5.1 | 26.0 ± 5.4 | 25.6 ± 6.1 | 0.33 |
Plasma HDL-C,4 mg/dL | 51.5 (49.0, 54.1) | 51.7 (49.9, 53.6) | 51.8 (50.3, 53.4) | 50.2 (47.6, 52.7) | 0.33 | 48.3 (41.6, 54.9) | 51.1 (48.9, 53.3) | 52.0 (50.2, 53.8) | 51.6 (47.7, 55.6) | 0.72 |
Plasma TGs,4 mg/dL | 68.1 (62.5, 74.1) | 62.4 (58.6, 66.4) | 65.3 (61.9, 68.9) | 71.6 (65.7, 78.0) | 0.06 | 79.2 (64.0, 98.2) | 68.0 (63.4, 73.0) | 63.8 (60.1, 67.6) | 63.9 (56.3, 72.6) | 0.29 |
Values are as follows: categorical variables, percentages; age, means ± SDs; BMI z score and total energy, medians ± IQRs because of skewed distributions; fruits/vegetables and discretionary solid fats, energy-adjusted means ± SDs because data were energy-adjusted with the use of the residual method before computing means and SDs; HDL-C, adjusted least square means (95% CI); TGs, adjusted least square geometric means (95% CI) because of skewed distributions. HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; SSB, sugar-sweetened beverage; svg, serving.
For the 380 children who had valid dietary data at baseline and 12 mo in the longitudinal study, the mean of SSB servings per week at baseline, 6 mo, and 12 mo was calculated to estimate mean SSB intake over 12 mo, and the same categories were created; 30 children were missing dietary data at 6 mo. Non-consumers represent children who reported zero consumption of SSBs at all time points. Baseline data for age, BMI z score, pubertal status, sedentary time, and HDL-C and TG concentrations are presented. Dietary data are mean intakes over 12 mo.
P values are P-trends for plasma HDL-C and TGs only.
Baseline HDL-C and TG concentrations were adjusted as follows: for the cross-sectional study, age, sex, race/ethnicity, pubertal status, BMI z score, sedentary time, total energy intake, and intakes of fruits/vegetables and discretionary solid fats; for the longitudinal study, baseline age, sex, race/ethnicity, baseline pubertal status, baseline BMI z score, baseline sedentary time, and mean intakes of total energy, fruits/vegetables, and discretionary solid fats.
Multivariable linear regressions with the use of ANCOVA modeled associations between SSB intake category and baseline HDL-cholesterol or TG concentrations, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, pubertal status, BMI z score, sedentary time, total energy intake, and intakes of fruits/vegetables (in servings/d) and discretionary solid fats (in g/d) as a proxy measure of diet quality. Baseline TG concentrations were log-transformed before regression analysis; thus, back-transformed adjusted geometric means and 95% CIs are presented. For HDL cholesterol, baseline adjusted means and 95% CIs are presented. Tests for linear trend of blood lipid concentrations across categories of SSB intake were conducted by including the median value per category as a continuous variable in regression models.
Longitudinal analyses compared SSB category with changes in HDL-cholesterol and TG concentrations between baseline and 12 mo. ANCOVA was used to compute unadjusted mean ± SEM lipid changes by SSB category and least square mean ± SEM lipid changes, and Tukey’s HSD test was used to adjust for multiple comparisons. For the first longitudinal research question, mean ± SEM lipid changes that adjusted for sex, race/ethnicity, baseline age, baseline lipid concentration, baseline pubertal status, baseline BMI z score, baseline sedentary time, and mean intakes of total energy, fruits/vegetables, and discretionary solid fats were compared by category of mean SSB intake. For the second longitudinal research question, mean ± SEM lipid changes that adjusted for sex, race/ethnicity, baseline age, baseline lipid concentration, baseline pubertal status, baseline BMI z score, baseline sedentary time, baseline SSB intake category, and changes in intakes of total energy, fruits/vegetables, and discretionary solid fats between baseline and 12 mo were compared by category of SSB intake change. Other preselected variables that had biological plausibility as potential confounders, including vitamin D supplementation dose and free/reduced-price school meals eligibility, were assessed as possible covariates but were not retained in the final regression models because they were not significantly correlated with SSB intake nor independently associated with HDL-cholesterol or TG concentrations in regression analyses. Effect modification by race/ethnicity was tested with the use of cross-product terms in linear regression models; however, P-interactions were not significant. Thus, results are presented for the full sample of children.
Results
At baseline, ∼85% of children reported consuming SSBs during the past week. Among SSB consumers (n = 521), median ± IQR intake was 63 ± 90 kcal/d, constituting ∼4.7% ± 6.1% of total daily energy intake and 2.9 ± 4.2 servings/wk (data not shown). In total, 109 children (18% of the baseline sample) consumed ≥7 servings/wk, or approximately ≥1 serving of SSBs daily (Table 1). When comparing sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics among baseline non-consumers and children who reported consuming <2, ≥2 but <7, and ≥7 SSB servings weekly, greater SSB consumption was associated with older age, late/after puberty status, and lower SES (P ≤ 0.007 for each). Overall racial/ethnic distributions did not differ across SSB intake categories (P = 0.15). However, other characteristics such as puberty status, SES, BMI z score, sedentary time, and both HDL cholesterol and TG concentrations differed by race/ethnicity at baseline (Supplemental Table 1). Higher SSB consumption was associated with progressively greater intakes of total energy and lower intakes of fruits/vegetables per day at baseline, whereas discretionary solid fat intake was lower in the highest intake group than in the other groups. In the cross-sectional study, a significant linear trend was observed between SSB intake categories and baseline plasma TG concentrations after multivariable adjustment among consumers (P-trend: 0.03), but with non-consumers included the trend was not significant (P-trend: 0.06; Table 1). No cross-sectional association was observed between SSB intake categories and HDL cholesterol.
For the longitudinal study, associations between SSB intake and low SES, total energy, and intake of fruits/vegetables persisted (Table 1). Moreover, greater mean SSB intake was associated with greater likelihood of sedentary time ≥4 h/d (P = 0.004); notably, no non-consumers were recorded as having ≥4 h/d of sedentary time. Over the 12-mo follow-up period, 97% of children reported consuming SSBs, and mean SSB intake among consumers comprised a median of 4.1% ± 5.9% of total energy daily and 2.7 ± 3.3 servings/wk (data not shown). Among 380 children, 12% consumed ≥1 SSB servings/d over the 12 mo. Between baseline and 12 mo, SSB intake decreased by ∼0.4 servings/wk (IQR: 3.5), and total energy also decreased (−195 ± 766 kcal/d). Over this same time period, HDL cholesterol increased a median of 2.7 ± 9.7 mg/dL and TGs increased 3.0 ± 32.5 mg/dL (data not shown). No association was observed between mean SSB intake and changes in HDL cholesterol or TGs (Table 2). However, over the 12-mo period, the increase in HDL-cholesterol concentrations was greater among children who decreased SSB intake by at least 1 serving/wk, controlling for SSB intake category at baseline, compared with children whose intake did not change or increased by at least 1 serving/wk (Table 3). No association was observed between change in SSB intake and TG changes.
TABLE 2.
Unadjusted lipid changes (by SSB intake category),2 mg/dL |
Adjusted lipid changes (by SSB intake category),3 mg/dL |
|||||||||
Concentration | Non-consumer | >0 to <2 svg/wk | ≥2 to <7 svg/wk | ≥7 svg/wk | P | Non-consumer | >0 to <2 svg/wk | ≥2 to <7 svg/wk | ≥7 svg/wk | P |
n | 13 | 135 | 186 | 46 | 13 | 135 | 186 | 46 | ||
Plasma HDL-C, mg/dL | 1.4 ± 2.2 | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 2.5 ± 0.6 | 3.3 ± 1.2 | 0.76 | 0.8 ± 2.2 | 3.7 ± 0.7 | 2.7 ± 0.6 | 2.5 ± 1.3 | 0.47 |
Plasma TGs, mg/dL | 11.8 ± 8.1 | 4.0 ± 2.5 | 3.5 ± 2.1 | 4.8 ± 4.3 | 0.80 | 18.6 ± 8.1 | 4.5 ± 2.7 | 2.1 ± 2.2 | 3.8 ± 4.8 | 0.26 |
HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; SSB, sugar-sweetened beverage; svg, serving.
Values are unadjusted means ± SEMs.
Least square means ± SEMs were adjusted for baseline age, sex, race/ethnicity, baseline lipid concentration, baseline pubertal status, baseline BMI z score, baseline sedentary time, and mean intakes of total energy, fruits/vegetables, and discretionary solid fats.
TABLE 3.
Unadjusted lipid changes (by SSB change category),2 mg/dL |
Adjusted lipid changes (by SSB change category),3 mg/dL |
|||||||
Concentration | ≥1 svg/wk decrease | No change | ≥1 svg/wk increase | P | ≥1 svg/wk decrease | No change | ≥1 svg/wk increase | P |
n | 154 | 122 | 104 | 154 | 122 | 104 | ||
Plasma HDL-C, mg/dL | 4.1 ± 0.6a | 2.2 ± 0.7a,b | 1.5 ± 0.8b | 0.02 | 4.6 ± 0.8a | 2.0 ± 0.8b | 1.5 ± 0.8b | 0.02 |
Plasma TGs, mg/dL | 3.2 ± 2.3 | 1.4 ± 2.6 | 8.6 ± 2.8 | 0.16 | 2.2 ± 3.0 | 1.0 ± 2.9 | 7.9 ± 3.0 | 0.19 |
HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; SSB, sugar-sweetened beverage; svg, serving.
Values are unadjusted means ± SEMs. Labeled means in a row without a common letter differ, P < 0.05 (ANCOVA with Tukey’s HSD test).
Least square means ± SEMs were adjusted for baseline age, sex, race/ethnicity, baseline lipid concentration, baseline pubertal status, baseline BMI z score, baseline sedentary time, baseline SSB intake category, and changes in intakes of total energy, fruits/vegetables, and discretionary solid fats over 12 mo. Labeled means in a row without a common letter differ, P < 0.05 (ANCOVA with Tukey's HSD test).
Discussion
In a racially and ethnically diverse population of children, 85% consumed SSBs at baseline, and 18% consumed the equivalent of at least seven 12-oz (150 kcal) servings of SSBs weekly, approximating ≥1 SSB serving daily. Nearly all (97%) of the children who were followed over 12 mo were SSB consumers, and 12% consumed ≥1 SSB serving daily. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses revealed associations between SSB intake and blood lipids; however, the associations differed. In cross-sectional analyses, greater SSB intake was associated with higher TG concentrations among consumers. Longitudinally over 12 mo, increases of ≥1 SSB servings weekly, or maintaining the same intake, were associated with lower HDL cholesterol increases, in comparison with children who decreased their SSB intake by ≥1 serving weekly.
Characteristics associated with SSB intake in our sample were largely expected. Greater SSB intake in children of lower SES was noted across many study samples (12) and may be related to SSBs being more heavily marketed in racial/ethnic-minority neighborhoods (26, 27) and less expensive than nutrient-dense food/beverage options. In both our cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, higher SSB intake was associated with higher intake of total energy and lower intake of fruits/vegetables, which may suggest a diluting effect on diet quality among SSB consumers (5, 6, 28). Further, substantial evidence exists for direct associations between sedentary time, particularly screen time, and poor diet quality, including SSB intake (29–32).
In children and adolescents, although considerable evidence suggests positive associations between SSBs and weight gain or obesity (3, 33–37), data are sparse on associations with other cardiometabolic risk factors such as blood lipids. Analyses of the multi-ethnic NHANES population have demonstrated positive associations between greater SSB intakes and TGs and inverse associations with HDL cholesterol (38, 39). In a smaller multi-ethnic pediatric sample, an adverse, positive association between added sugars and TGs was observed, but no association was detected with HDL cholesterol (40). Our cross-sectional analyses demonstrated an association with increased TG concentrations across SSB intake categories among consumers, up to 71.6 mg/dL in the top category, after adjusting for BMI z score, total energy, and other possible confounders; however, no association was observed with HDL-cholesterol concentrations.
Our first longitudinal research question considered whether mean SSB intake over 12 mo was associated with changes in blood lipids between baseline and 12 mo. The use of mean SSB intake data from multiple FFQs likely improved the precision of the SSB intake estimate (41–43), which reduced random measurement error and was expected to increase power to detect associations in the smaller longitudinal sample (n = 380 vs. 613 for cross-sectional analyses). However, mean SSB intake did not show an association with lipid changes over 12 mo. In this study, children’s self-reporting of dietary intake, particularly over time, likely introduced measurement error, most plausibly contributing to attenuation of findings. Specifically, misclassification of SSB intake may have occurred, because underreporting of foods perceived to be unhealthy such as SSBs is common, particularly among children who are overweight or obese (44). Notably, in both the cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, we found that children identified as non-consumers appeared to be characteristically different (28) from children in the SSB consumption categories, with relatively high TG concentrations at baseline. Another possibility is that children may have recently changed their SSB consumption behavior due to underlying health concerns. For example, children who were less healthy or overweight/obese may have been told to reduce SSB consumption, which our data may have captured. Nonetheless, underreporting of SSB intake by children in this study likely played a role in attenuating these longitudinal study findings.
To take advantage of the temporal aspect of the longitudinal data, we also examined the association between change in SSB and change in lipids. We report a significant association of a more favorable HDL cholesterol change in children who decreased their SSB intake compared with children who stayed the same or increased intake over 12 mo. Although the change in SSB consumption captured in this study was the difference between reported intake at baseline and 12 mo, with non-consumers at both times included within the no change category, by controlling for baseline SSB intake category, SSB changes were placed into context within the spectrum of SSB intake. Other studies in this age group have reported longitudinal associations between added sugars or SSBs and HDL cholesterol, including decreased HDL cholesterol over 3 y in adolescents with greater SSB consumption (1) and among white/Caucasian and African American girls aged 9–10 y at baseline, a 2.2-mg/dL mean increase in HDL cholesterol over 10 y among children with low added-sugar intakes compared with a 0.4-mg/dL decrease among children with high added-sugar intakes (15). Because between 9 and 12 y of age, HDL cholesterol was reported to decline slightly and to rebound in late teens (15), the increased HDL cholesterol observed in this study, and the greater HDL cholesterol increase in children who decreased their SSB intake, are hypothesis-generating findings worth pursuing in further studies. Given that children in this study took a daily vitamin D supplement for 6 mo, potential beneficial effects on HDL-cholesterol and/or TG concentrations (45–47) may have persisted at 12 mo; however, we found that dose distributions and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D changes did not differ across SSB intake categories (data not shown); thus, vitamin D supplementation effects cannot explain the longitudinal study’s findings.
The Daily D Health Study sample comprised a large sample of children that was predominantly non-white/Caucasian and of lower SES, providing a valuable sample with which to conduct this research. Having repeated measures of dietary, sociodemographic, anthropometric, and fasting blood data allowed us to investigate longitudinal associations over 12 mo between SSB intake and dyslipidemia measures. However, the study has limitations. As noted, children’s self-reporting of dietary intake likely introduced measurement error. Moreover, although validation studies for the Block FFQ for Children have reported relatively high relative validity (intraclass correlation: 0.69) for measuring percentage of energy from carbohydrate (19) and similar accuracy in capturing intake of fruit drinks and sodas as 3-d food diaries (48), children aged ≥12 y reported more accurately than younger children (19), and a lack of traditional, cultural food and beverage items on the FFQ resulted in underestimates of dietary intake among minority racial/ethnic groups (49, 50). In addition, the FFQ does not include nontraditional SSBs, such as sports/energy drinks (12), which may have contributed to misclassification of SSB intake. Most likely, these sources of dietary measurement error resulted in underestimating levels of exposure, attenuating study findings. Similarly, imprecise physical activity data precluded the use of a more quantitative measure as a covariate in regression analyses; however, self-reported sedentary time has also shown strong correlations with SSB intake (29–32) and cardiometabolic risk (51, 52).
In conclusion, this study observed a positive association among consumers between higher SSB intake and higher TG concentrations in cross-sectional analyses and an inverse longitudinal association between SSB intake changes and HDL cholesterol changes, with decreased SSB intake associated with a greater increase in HDL cholesterol over 12 mo. Thus, both greater SSB intake at baseline and increased SSB intake over 12 mo showed associations with blood lipids. These findings reinforce the importance of minimizing consumption of SSBs among children/adolescents, particularly among groups with greater tendency to consume them. However, given that few longitudinal studies investigating SSBs and blood lipids have been conducted in racially/ethnically diverse samples of children/adolescents and that our cross-sectional and longitudinal results showed differing associations with TGs and HDL cholesterol, respectively, additional longitudinal research in large, multi-ethnic samples is needed to better understand the health implications of SSB intake in diverse samples of children.
Acknowledgments
We thank Daily D Health Study co-investigator Michael Holick, data programmer Peter Bakun, and Gail Rogers for providing statistical expertise, particularly on dietary data analysis. MIVR and JMS designed and conducted the research; MIVR analyzed the data, wrote the paper, and had primary responsibility for the final content; NMM, EG, ME, VRC, CMG, CDE, and JMS provided feedback on the analysis and critical comments on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
References
- 1.Ambrosini GL, Oddy WH, Huang RC, Mori TA, Beilin LJ, Jebb SA. Prospective associations between sugar-sweetened beverage intakes and cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;98:327–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang J, Light K, Henderson M, O’Loughlin J, Mathieu ME, Paradis G, Gray-Donald K. Consumption of added sugars from liquid but not solid sources predicts impaired glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance among youth at risk of obesity. J Nutr 2014;144:81–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bigornia SJ, LaValley MP, Noel SE, Moore LL, Ness AR, Newby P. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and central and total adiposity in older children: a prospective study accounting for dietary reporting errors. Public Health Nutr 2015;18:1155–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kit BK, Fakhouri TH, Park S, Nielsen SJ, Ogden CL. Trends in sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among youth and adults in the United States: 1999–2010. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;98:180–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Frary CD, Johnson RK, Wang MQ. Children and adolescents’ choices of foods and beverages high in added sugars are associated with intakes of key nutrients and food groups. J Adolesc Health 2004;34:56–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Libuda L, Alexy U, Buyken AE, Sichert-Hellert W, Stehle P, Kersting M. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and its association with nutrient intakes and diet quality in German children and adolescents. Br J Nutr 2009;101:1549–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Te Morenga LA, Howatson AJ, Jones RM, Mann J. Dietary sugars and cardiometabolic risk: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of the effects on blood pressure and lipids. Am J Clin Nutr 2014;100:65–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Richelsen B. Sugar-sweetened beverages and cardio-metabolic disease risks. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2013;16:478–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lustig RH. Fructose: it’s “alcohol without the buzz”. Adv Nutr 2013;4:226–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gidding SS. Dyslipidemia in the metabolic syndrome in children. J Cardiometab Syndr 2006;1:282–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mesirow MS, Welsh JA. Changing beverage consumption patterns have resulted in fewer liquid calories in the diets of US children: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001–2010. J Acad Nutr Diet 2015;115:559–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Han E, Powell LM. Consumption patterns of sugar-sweetened beverages in the United States. J Acad Nutr Diet 2013;113:43–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dodd AH, Briefel R, Cabili C, Wilson A, Crepinsek MK. Disparities in consumption of sugar-sweetened and other beverages by race/ethnicity and obesity status among United States schoolchildren. J Nutr Educ Behav 2013;45:240–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kaikkonen JE, Mikkila V, Magnussen CG, Juonala M, Viikari JS, Raitakari OT. Does childhood nutrition influence adult cardiovascular disease risk?–insights from the Young Finns Study. Ann Med 2013;45:120–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lee AK, Binongo JN, Chowdhury R, Stein AD, Gazmararian JA, Vos MB, Welsh JA. Consumption of less than 10% of total energy from added sugars is associated with increasing HDL in females during adolescence: a longitudinal analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2014;3:e000615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.The Obesity Society [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): The Society; c2014. Reduced consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages can reduce total caloric intake [position statement]; 2014 April 23 [cited 2014 May 6]. Available from: http://www.obesity.org/publications/reduced-consumption-of-sugar-sweetened-beverages-can-reduce-total-caloric-intake.htm.
- 17.Sacheck JM, Van Rompay MI, Olson EM, Chomitz VR, Goodman E, Gordon CM, Eliasziw M, Holick MF, Economos CD. Recruitment and retention of urban schoolchildren into a randomized double-blind vitamin D supplementation trial. Clin Trials 2015;12:45–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Block G. Validating Block Kids Questionnaire. J Am Diet Assoc 2008;108:1995–6; author reply 1996. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 19.Cullen KW, Watson K, Zakeri I. Relative reliability and validity of the Block Kids Questionnaire among youth aged 10 to 17 years. J Am Diet Assoc 2008;108:862–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rockett HR, Breitenbach M, Frazier AL, Witschi J, Wolf AM, Field AE, Colditz GA. Validation of a youth/adolescent food frequency questionnaire. Prev Med 1997;26:808–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service. National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 27. Washington (DC): USDA; 2014.
- 22.Dixon W, Yuen K. Trimming and winsorization: a review. Stat Papers 1974;15:157–70. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Internet]. Atlanta: CDC; c2013. BMI Percentile Calculator for Child and Teen: English Version; 2013 June [cited 2007 Dec 3]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/00binaries/bmi-tables.pdf.
- 24.Carskadon MA, Acebo C. A self-administered rating scale for pubertal development. J Adolesc Health 1993;14:190–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tanner J. Fetus into man: physical growth from conception to maturity. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1990.
- 26.Kumar G, Onufrak S, Zytnick D, Kingsley B, Park S. Self-reported advertising exposure to sugar-sweetened beverages among US youth. Public Health Nutr 2015;18:1173–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Powell LM, Wada R, Kumanyika SK. Racial/ethnic and income disparities in child and adolescent exposure to food and beverage television ads across the U.S. media markets. Health Place 2014;29:124–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bleich SN, Wolfson JAUS. Adults and child snacking patterns among sugar-sweetened beverage drinkers and non-drinkers. Prev Med 2015;72:8–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Olafsdottir S, Berg C, Eiben G, Lanfer A, Reisch L, Ahrens W, Kourides Y, Molnar D, Moreno LA, Siani A, et al. . Young children’s screen activities, sweet drink consumption and anthropometry: results from a prospective European study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014;68:223–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gebremariam MK, Bergh IH, Andersen LF, Ommundsen Y, Totland TH, Bjelland M, Grydeland M, Lien N. Are screen-based sedentary behaviors longitudinally associated with dietary behaviors and leisure-time physical activity in the transition into adolescence? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2013;10:9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pearson N, Biddle SJ. Sedentary behavior and dietary intake in children, adolescents, and adults. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2011;41:178–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ranjit N, Evans MH, Byrd-Williams C, Evans AE, Hoelscher DM. Dietary and activity correlates of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among adolescents. Pediatrics 2010;126:e754–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lim S, Zoellner JM, Lee JM, Burt BA, Sandretto AM, Sohn W, Ismail AI, Lepkowski JM. Obesity and sugar-sweetened beverages in African-American preschool children: a longitudinal study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009;17:1262–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Malik VS, Pan A, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;98:1084–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hu FB. Resolved: there is sufficient scientific evidence that decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption will reduce the prevalence of obesity and obesity-related diseases. Obes Rev 2013;14:606–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ebbeling CB, Feldman HA, Chomitz VR, Antonelli TA, Gortmaker SL, Osganian SK, Ludwig DS. A randomized trial of sugar-sweetened beverages and adolescent body weight. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1407–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zheng M, Rangan A, Olsen NJ, Bo Andersen L, Wedderkopp N, Kristensen P, Grontved A, Ried-Larsen M, Lempert SM, Allman-Farinelli M, et al. . Sugar-sweetened beverages consumption in relation to changes in body fatness over 6 and 12 years among 9-year-old children: the European Youth Heart Study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014;68:77–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kosova EC, Auinger P, Bremer AA. The relationships between sugar-sweetened beverage intake and cardiometabolic markers in young children. J Acad Nutr Diet 2013;113:219–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bremer AA, Byrd RS, Auinger P. Differences in male and female adolescents from various racial groups in the relationship between insulin resistance-associated parameters with sugar-sweetened beverage intake and physical activity levels. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2010;49:1134–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kell KP, Cardel MI, Bohan Brown MM, Fernandez JR. Added sugars in the diet are positively associated with diastolic blood pressure and triglycerides in children. Am J Clin Nutr 2014;100:46–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Rimm E, Ascherio A, Rosner BA, Spiegelman D, Willett WC. Dietary fat and coronary heart disease: a comparison of approaches for adjusting for total energy intake and modeling repeated dietary measurements. Am J Epidemiol 1999;149:531–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dhingra R, Sullivan L, Jacques PF, Wang TJ, Fox CS, Meigs JB, D’Agostino RB, Gaziano JM, Vasan RS. Soft drink consumption and risk of developing cardiometabolic risk factors and the metabolic syndrome in middle-aged adults in the community. Circulation 2007;116:480–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Duffey KJ, Gordon-Larsen P, Steffen LM, Jacobs DR Jr, Popkin BM. Drinking caloric beverages increases the risk of adverse cardiometabolic outcomes in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;92:954–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Burrows TL, Martin RJ, Collins CE. A systematic review of the validity of dietary assessment methods in children when compared with the method of doubly labeled water. J Am Diet Assoc 2010;110:1501–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kelishadi R, Farajzadegan Z, Bahreynian M. Association between vitamin D status and lipid profile in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2014;65:404–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Williams DM, Fraser A, Sayers A, Fraser WD, Hypponen E, Smith GD, Sattar N, Lawlor DA. Associations of childhood 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and D3 and cardiovascular risk factors in adolescence: prospective findings from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2014;21:281–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rodríguez-Rodríguez E, Ortega RM, González-Rodriguez LG, López-Sobaler AM; UCM Research Group VALORNUT (920030). Vitamin D deficiency is an independent predictor of elevated triglycerides in Spanish school children. Eur J Nutr 2011;50:373–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Marshall TA, Eichenberger Gilmore JM, Broffitt B, Stumbo PJ, Levy SM. Relative validity of the Iowa Fluoride Study targeted nutrient semi-quantitative questionnaire and the Block kids’ food questionnaire for estimating beverage, calcium, and vitamin D intakes by children. J Am Diet Assoc 2008;108:465–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Smith C, Fila S. Comparison of the Kid’s Block Food Frequency Questionnaire to the 24-hour recall in urban Native American youth. Am J Hum Biol 2006;18:706–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mulasi-Pokhriyal U, Smith C. Comparison of the Block Kid’s Food Frequency Questionnaire with a 24 h dietary recall methodology among Hmong-American children, 9–18 years of age. Br J Nutr 2013;109:346–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Väaistö J, Eloranta AM, Viitasalo A, Tompuri T, Lintu N, Karjalainen P, Lampinen EK, Ågren J, Laaksonen DE, Lakka HM, et al. . Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in relation to cardiometabolic risk in children: cross-sectional findings from the Physical Activity and Nutrition in Children (PANIC) Study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2014;11:55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Schmidt ME, Haines J, O’Brien A, McDonald J, Price S, Sherry B, Taveras EM. Systematic review of effective strategies for reducing screen time among young children. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012;20:1338–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]