Abstract
We report the single-contig genome sequence of the anaerobic, mesophilic, cellulolytic bacterium, Bacteroides cellulosolvens. The bacterium produces a particularly elaborate cellulosome system, wherein the types of cohesin-dockerin interactions are opposite of other known cellulosome systems: cell-surface attachment is thus mediated via type-I interactions, whereas enzymes are integrated via type-II interactions.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
The cellulosome is one of the most efficient systems known to biodegrade plant cell-wall polysaccharides and cellulosic wastes. This multi-enzyme extracellular complex incorporates multiple hydrolytic enzymes onto the bacterial cell-surface through dockerin modules that tightly bind to scaffoldin proteins via complementary cohesin modules (1–3). Additional carbohydrate-binding modules (CBM) attach the entire enzymatic complex to the cellulosic substrate (4). The biodegrading activity of cellulosomes has been studied extensively in related cellulolytic bacteria, such as Clostridium (Ruminiclostridium) thermocellum, Acetivibrio cellulolyticus, Clostridium (Ruminiclostridium) clariflavum, Clostridium (Ruminiclostridium) cellulolyticum, Clostridium cellulovorans, Clostridium (Ruminiclostridium) papyrosolvens, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens (5).
Bacteroides cellulosolvens ATCC 35603 (DSM 2933) is a cellulolytic bacterium, originally isolated from sewage sludge (6, 7) in co-culture with Clostridium saccharolyticum. Initially classified as a Gram-negative bacterium, analysis of the 16S RNA indicated that B. cellulosolvens, like A. cellulolyticus, is a member of the phylogenetically diverse clostridial assemblage (8, 9). Recently, B. cellulosolvens was renamed Pseudobacteroides cellulosolvens (10).
B. cellulosolvens was selected for its ability to grow under mesophilic, anaerobic conditions, and the bacterium was able to bind and degrade crystalline cellulose to cellobiose and glucose (11–13). Its cellulose-degrading activity was shown to be cell-associated (14), and elaborate cellulolytic cell-surface structures were subsequently demonstrated (15, 16). Cellulosome-like complexes were further identified in the bacterium (17), supported by the recognition of the major scaffoldin protein (CipBc, later renamed ScaA) (18, 19), which includes eleven type-II cohesin domains, a family-3a CBM, and a C-terminal dockerin domain. Its scaffoldin was shown to interact with a family-48 glycoside hydrolase (18), and the crystal structure of its type-II cohesin was determined (20).
The genome is reported as a large contig of 6,878,816 bp, translated into 5,897 predicted proteins. Sequencing was performed using PacBio RS-II technology and data from four SMRT cells was assembled using SMRTanalysis v2.2 (HGAP3 protocol). The initial assembly generated three contigs at ~65× raw read coverage, which were joined using Geneious R8 (21) and then validated by PCR and Sanger sequencing (22). Illumina reads (at ~200× coverage) also confirmed contiguity. The ends of the single contig were unable to be joined experimentally or in silico, possibly as a result of a misassembly or active mobile genetic element. Active transposase systems have been shown to interfere with closure previously (23). Therefore, the genome is reported as near-complete assembly. Gene prediction and annotation were performed as described previously (24, 25).
Intriguingly, the types of cohesin-dockerin interaction in B. cellulosolvens are reversed from those of all other known cellulosome systems, whereby cell-surface attachment of noncatalytic scaffoldins in B. cellulosolvens is mediated via type-I interactions, whereas the enzymes are integrated via type II-interactions (19, 26, 27). The genome codes for 75 cohesin modules (mostly type-II cohesins), packaged in more than two-dozen scaffoldins, and over 200 dockerin-containing proteins, including glycoside hydrolases, carbohydrate esterases, and polysaccharide lyases. Thus, B. cellulosolvens scaffoldins represent the largest noncatalytic cellulosomal subunits known to date, indicating the presence of a particularly elaborate cellulosome system.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession number LGTC00000000. The version described in this paper is version LGTC01000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the DOE Office of Science through the BioEnergy Science Center, a U.S. DOE Bioenergy Research Center. ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. Grants from the following foundations are gratefully acknowledged: European Union, Area NMP.2013.1.1-2: Self-assembly of naturally occurring nanosystems: CellulosomePlus Project 604530; ERA-IB Consortium (EIB.12.022), acronym FiberFuel; the F. Warren Hellman Grant for Alternative Energy Research in Israel in support of alternative energy research in Israel administered by the Israel Strategic Alternative Energy Foundation (I-SAEF); grants 1349 and 24/11 from the Israel Science Foundation (ISF); the establishment of an Israeli Center of Research Excellence (I-CORE Center 152/11) managed by the ISF, Jerusalem, Israel.
E.A.B. is the incumbent of the Maynard I. and Elaine Wishner Chair of Bio-organic Chemistry.
Footnotes
Citation Dassa B, Utturkar S, Hurt RA, Klingeman DM, Keller M, Xu J, Reddy YHK, Borovok I, Rozman Grinberg I, Lamed R, Zhivin O, Bayer EA, Brown SD. 2015. Near-complete genome sequence of the cellulolytic bacterium Bacteroides (Pseudobacteroides) cellulosolvens ATCC 35603. Genome Announc 3(5):e01022-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01022-15.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bayer EA, Morag E, Lamed R. 1994. The cellulosome—A treasure-trove for biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 12:379–386. doi: 10.1016/0167-7799(94)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bayer EA, Belaich J, Shoham Y, Lamed R. 2004. The cellulosomes: Multienzyme machines for degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Annu Rev Microbiol 58:521–554. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.091022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fontes CM, Gilbert HJ. 2010. Cellulosomes: highly efficient nanomachines designed to deconstruct plant cell wall complex carbohydrates. Annu Rev Biochem 79:655–681. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-091208-085603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boraston AB, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ. 2004. Carbohydrate-binding modules: fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. Biochem J 382:769–781. doi: 10.1042/BJ20040892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bayer EA, Lamed R, White BA, Flint HJ. 2008. From cellulosomes to cellulosomics. Chem Rec 8:364–377. doi: 10.1002/tcr.20160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Murray WD, Sowden LC, Colvin JR. 1984. Bacteroides cellulosolvens sp. nov., a cellulolytic species from sewage sludge. Int J Syst Bacteriol 34:185–187. doi: 10.1099/00207713-34-2-185. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Murray WD, Sowden LC, Colvin JR. 1986. Symbiotic relationship of Bacteroides cellulosolvens and Clostridium saccharolyticum in cellulose fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 51:710–715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lin C, Urbance JW, Stahl DA. 1994. Acetivibrio cellulolyticus and Bacteroides cellulosolvens are members of the greater clostridial assemblage. FEMS Microbiol Lett 124:151–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07277.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yutin N, Galperin MY. 2013. A genomic update on clostridial phylogeny: gram-negative spore formers and other misplaced clostridia. Environ Microbiol 15:2631–2634. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Horino H, Fujita T, Tonouchi A. 2014. Description of Anaerobacterium chartisolvens gen. nov., sp. nov., an obligately anaerobic bacterium from Clostridium rRNA cluster III isolated from soil of a Japanese rice field, and reclassification of Bacteroides cellulosolvens Murray et al. 1984 as Pseudobacteroides cellulosolvens gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 64:1296–1303. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.059378-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Giuliano C, Khan AW. 1984. Cellulase and sugar formation by Bacteroides cellulosolvens, a newly isolated cellulolytic anaerobe. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:446–448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Giuliano C, Khan AW. 1985. Conversion of cellulose to sugars by resting cells of a mesophilic anaerobe, Bacteroides cellulosolvens. Biotechnol Bioeng 27:980–983. doi: 10.1002/bit.260270708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Murray WD. 1985. Increased cellulose hydrolysis by Bacteroides cellulosolvens in a simplified synthetic medium. J Biotechnol 3:131–140. doi: 10.1016/0168-1656(85)90014-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Murray WD, Sowden LC, Colvin JR. 1986. Localization of the cellulase activity of Bacteroides cellulosolvens. Lett Appl Microbiol 3:69–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1986.tb01550.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lamed R, Naimark J, Morgenstern E, Bayer EA. 1987. Specialized cell surface structures in cellulolytic bacteria. J Bacteriol 169:3792–3800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Morag E, Halevy I, Bayer EA, Lamed R. 1991. Isolation and properties of a major cellobiohydrolase from the cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum. J Bacteriol 173:4155–4162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lamed R, Morag (Morgenstern) E, Mor-Yosef O, Bayer EA. 1991. Cellulosome-like entities in Bacteroides cellulosolvens. Curr Microbiol 22:27–33. doi: 10.1007/BF02106209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ding S-Y, Bayer EA, Steiner D, Shoham Y, Lamed R. 2000. A scaffoldin of the Bacteroides cellulosolvens cellulosome that contains 11 type II cohesins. J Bacteriol 182:4915–4925. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.17.4915-4925.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xu Q, Bayer EA, Goldman M, Kenig R, Shoham Y, Lamed R. 2004. Architecture of the Bacteroides cellulosolvens cellulosome: description of a cell-surface-anchoring scaffoldin and a family-48 cellulase. J Bacteriol 186:968–977. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.4.968-977.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Noach I, Frolow F, Jakoby H, Rosenheck S, Shimon LJW, Lamed R, Bayer EA. 2005. Crystal structure of a type-II cohesin module from the Bacteroides cellulosolvens cellulosome reveals novel and distinctive secondary structural elements. J Mol Biol 348:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. 2012. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Utturkar SM, Klingeman DM, Land ML, Schadt CW, Doktycz MJ, Pelletier DA, Brown SD. 2014. Evaluation and validation of de novo and hybrid assembly techniques to derive high-quality genome sequences. Bioinformatics 30:2709–2716. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.De Leon KB, Utturkar SM, Camilleri LB, Elias DA, Arkin AP, Fields MW, Brown SD, Wall JD. 2015. Complete genome sequence of Pelosinus fermentans JBW45, a member of a remarkably competitive group of Negativicutes in the Firmicutes phylum. Genome Announc 2(5):01090-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01090-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Woo HL, Utturkar S, Klingeman D, Simmons BA, DeAngelis KM, Brown SD, Hazen TC. 2014. Draft genome sequence of the lignin-degrading Burkholderia sp. strain lig30, isolated from wet tropical forest soil. Genome Announc 2(3):00637-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00637-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hyatt D, Chen G-L, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Haimovitz R, Barak Y, Morag E, Voronov-Goldman M, Shoham Y, Lamed R, Bayer EA. 2008. Cohesin-dockerin microarray: diverse specificities between two complementary families of interacting protein modules. Proteomics 8:968–979. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200700486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cameron K, Weinstein JY, Zhivin O, Bule P, Fleishman SJ, Alves VD, Gilbert HJ, Ferreira LMA, Fontes CMGA, Bayer EA, Najmudin S. 2015. Combined crystal structure of a type-I cohesin: mutation and affinity-binding studies reveal structural determinants of cohesin-dockerin specificity. J Biol Chem 290:16215–16225. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.653303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]