Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Smok Cessat. 2014 Sep 4;2014:10.1017/jsc.2014.20. doi: 10.1017/jsc.2014.20

Prospective Evaluation of Factors Predicting Nicotine Withdrawal Symptoms Among Korean Americans

Sun S Kim 1, Hua Fang 2, Sherry A McKee 3, Douglas Ziedonis 1
PMCID: PMC4582669  NIHMSID: NIHMS691527  PMID: 26413165

Abstract

Introduction

This study examined factors predicting nicotine withdrawal symptoms following quitting among Korean American smokers who were receiving counseling and nicotine replacement therapy.

Methods

The sample comprised 90 Korean American smokers selected from a two-arm randomised controlled trial of a smoking cessation intervention (culturally adapted versus treatment as usual). Nicotine withdrawal symptoms were assessed weekly for the first four weeks from the target quit day, using the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS). Only those who participated in two or more weekly assessments of the symptoms were included.

Results

Among the nine withdrawal symptoms listed in the MNWS, craving and disturbed sleep decreased over time whereas the remaining symptoms had no significant effect of time. Women or individuals who perceived greater risks of quitting smoking reported more withdrawal symptoms after controlling for abstinence status. Although withdrawal symptoms did not change, on average, with time, the rates of change varied randomly across individuals. Women reported more withdrawal symptoms in the first week after quitting and showed a higher rate of decline of the symptoms over time than men.

Conclusions

Korean American smokers who are women or who perceive greater risks of quitting smoking may require more intensive treatment to effectively deal with post-quit withdrawal symptoms.

Introduction

Nicotine withdrawal and craving for cigarettes may be one of the greatest challenges that smokers face during a quit attempt (Baker et al., 2012). As per Shiffman, West, Gilbert, and the Society of Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT) Work Group (2004), tobacco withdrawal is ‘a syndrome of behavioural, affective, cognitive, and physiological symptoms, typically transient, emerging upon cessation or reduction of tobacco use and causing distress or impairment’ (p. 600). Hughes (2007) upheld his earlier review of the effects of nicotine abstinence by stating that anger, anxiety, depression, difficulty in concentrating, impatience, insomnia, and restlessness are valid withdrawal symptoms that peak within the first week and last for two to four weeks. The Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS) developed by Hughes and Hatsukami (1986) is a commonly used instrument for assessing withdrawal symptoms. This scale assesses craving and eight other symptoms: anger/irritability/frustration, anxiety, difficulty in concentrating, depression, increased appetite, insomnia, restlessness, and impatience.

Smoking cessation treatments target nicotine withdrawal symptoms and triggers for craving. For example, psychosocial treatment provides education on increased awareness of craving triggers and ways to manage withdrawal symptoms. Accordingly, pharmacological treatment has been focused on alleviating nicotine withdrawal symptoms. Compared with placebo, nicotine replacement therapy reduces many of cognitive, physiological, and psychomotor withdrawal symptoms in abstinent smokers (Cole et al., 2010; Gourlay, Forbes, Marriner, Pethica & McNeilet al., 1995; Menossi et al., 2013).

Individuals may differ in the experience of nicotine withdrawal symptoms, depending on their levels of nicotine dependence and other factors such as gender and depression. Women are likely to have more withdrawal symptoms than men (Pauly, 2008; Toll et al., 2008), although some found the opposite (Pomerleau, Tate, Lumley & Pomerleau, 1994). Smokers with a history of depression report more withdrawal symptoms and have a greater risk of relapse to smoking after a quit attempt than smokers with no history of depression (Breslau, Kilbey & Andreski, 1992; Pomerleau et al., 1994; Weinberger, Desai & McKee, 2010; Weinberger, Pilver, Desai, Mazure & McKee, 2012). Furthermore, the association between depression and smoking is more pronounced among women than men (Husky, Mazure, Paliwal & McKee, 2008). Women also have more depressive symptomatology than men following quitting (Leventhal et al., 2007; Pomerleau, Brouwer & Pomerleau, 2001; Xu et al., 2008).

Significant gender differences were found in perceived risks of quitting smoking among smokers who were seeking cessation treatment (McKee, O’Malley, Salovey, Krishnan-Sarin & Maure, 2005). Compared with men, women anticipated more risks of craving, weight gain, and other withdrawal symptoms. However, except for weight gain, the perceived risks did not differ by gender among non-treatment seeking smokers (Weinberger, Mazure & McKee, 2008). In addition, gender differences in nicotine withdrawal symptoms have been explicated in light of female hormones affecting faster nicotine metabolism, which results in more severe withdrawal symptoms compared with men (Allen, Allen, Widenmier & Al’absi, 2009; Carpenter, Upadhyaya, La Rowe, Saladin & Brady, 2006; Hogle & Curtin, 2006).

The purpose of the present study was to examine factors that might predict nicotine withdrawal symptoms among Korean American smokers during the early phase of quitting while they were receiving cessation treatment. Both men and women of this ethnic subgroup are known for the highest rates of smoking within the Asian American population (Caraballo, Yee, Gfroerer & Mirza, 2008; Kim, Ziedonis, Chen, 2007; Li, Kwon, Weerasinghe, Rey & Trinh-Shervin, 2013). Information gained from this study will help clinicians identify subgroups of Korean American smokers who may have more severe withdrawal symptoms and therefore require more intensive treatment for successful smoking cessation. We hypothesised that gender, depression, and perceived risks of quitting smoking would predict withdrawal symptoms while adjusting for abstinence status.

Methods

Design

This is a secondary analysis of a two-arm randomised controlled trial of an eight-week smoking cessation intervention for Korean Americans (Kim et al., in press). Participants were randomly assigned either to a culturally adapted intervention arm or to a brief standard intervention arm (i.e., treatment as usual). Regardless of treatment condition, participants in both arms received eight weekly individualised sessions of cognitive behavioural therapy and eight-weeks of nicotine patches. The length of session differed between the cultural and standard arms as 40 minutes versus 10 minutes and the medication was given with a gradual-dosage tapering schedule as follows: 21-mg dosage for four weeks, 14 mg for two weeks, and then 7 mg for two weeks. Quit day was set between the second and fourth therapy sessions of the individual therapy and each participant selected the day in consultation with the counselor. Except for one, all participants received the interventions in the Korean language. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Massachusetts Medical School.

Participants

Participants included Korean Americans who self-reported having smoked at least 10 cigarettes per day for the past six months. Of the 109 participants in the original study (Kim et al., in press), 90 (82.6%) were included in this study. Irrespective of lapses or relapse to smoking, individuals were excluded if they had missed more than two weekly assessments of withdrawal symptoms. The original study did not exclude participants who had a history of depression. Seven had been diagnosed with the disorder and of these four (two women and two men) were included in this study.

Procedures

Participants self-administered the MNWS just before each weekly therapy session. The first assessment was usually done within the first three days from the target quit day (Mean (M) = 3.28, Standard Deviation (SD) = 2.59) and then weekly thereafter. Participants were instructed to rate each of the nine symptoms as they experienced these at the time of the assessment. The overall response rate to the four weekly assessments was 94.2% (339 observations out of all possible 360 observations).

Measures

Withdrawal symptoms and smoking status (abstinence vs. lapses/relapse) were assessed weekly for four weeks after quitting. The variable ‘perceived risks of quitting smoking’ was assessed at baseline and the fourth post-quit week. However, only baseline data were used in this study. All other variables, including depressive symptoms, were assessed only once at baseline. All measures listed below had been translated and back-translated through a rigorous process of cross-cultural validation, and pilot-tested with Korean Americans. Findings pertaining to their psycho-metric functions have been reported elsewhere (e.g., Kim, Fang, DiFranza, Ziedonis & Ma, 2012; Kim, Gulick, Kim & Seo, 2007).

Nicotine withdrawal

The variable was assessed using MNWS (Hughes & Hatsukami, 1986) that is a 5-point Likert-type scale of nine items: craving, irritability/frustration/anger, difficulty in concentrating, anxiety, restlessness, increased appetite, disturbed sleep, depression, and impatience. The total score is the sum of the nine-item scores and can range between 0 and 40 (Jorenby et al., 1996). The measure has been validated with Korean Americans in a previous study (Kim et al., 2007).

Demographic data and acculturation

Information was gathered with respect to gender, age, marital status, education, employment status, annual family income, and religion. Acculturation was assessed using the Suinn–Lew Asian Self-Identify Acculturation Scale (Suinn, Rickard-Figueroa, Lew & Vigil, 1987) and the scale items included familiarity with spoken and written languages, preference for language, ethnic identity, friends, food, movie, and music. Scores of the 21 items were averaged to estimate the scale score that ranges between 1 and 5.

Female reproductive information

The Yale Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Instrument (Freeman et al., 2004) was used to assess reproductive status among the three stages (premenopause, perimenopause, and post-menopause). In addition, information was collected on menstruation cycle dates, a history of gynecological surgeries, and use of hormonal replacement therapies and contraception.

Smoking behaviours and nicotine dependence

The following information was gathered: age at smoking onset, a history of any quit attempts in the past year, and any serious quit attempts that lasted at least 24 hours in the past year. Nicotine dependence was assessed using the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND; Heatherton, Kozlowski, Frecker & Fagerström, 1991). The total score is the sum of the six-item scores and can range between 0 and 10. A high score indicates high dependence on nicotine. We used the Korean version developed by Park and colleagues (2004).

Depressive symptoms

The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (Radloff, 1977) was used. The total score is the sum of the 20-item scores and can vary in the range of 0 to 60. The scale had been translated into Korean and found to be a valid and reliable measure for use with Koreans (Cho & Kim, 1998). Instead of the cutoff score of 16 recommended for the determination of depression, we used a score of 21 that was recommended for Koreans (Cho & Kim, 1998).

Perceived risks

The variable was assessed using the perceived risk subscale of the Perceived Risks and Benefits Questionnaire (McKee et al., 2005). The subscale consists of 18 items on perceived risks of quitting smoking (e.g., ‘I will be less able to concentrate,’ and ‘I will miss the taste of cigarettes’) that can be divided into six dimensions: weight gain, negative affect, attention/concentration, social ostracism, loss of enjoyment, and craving. The mean of the 18-item scores is the scale score that can range between 1 and 7.

Smoking status

Abstinence, lapse, and relapse were assessed weekly right after the assessment of withdrawal symptoms, using the seven-day Timeline Follow-Back Scale (Sobell & Sobell, 2003). Abstinence was defined as having not smoked even a single puff within the past seven days (seven-day point prevalence abstinence; Hughes et al., 2003). Self-reported abstinence was verified with expired-air carbon monoxide (CO) levels using a cutoff point of 6 parts per million (ppm) (Kim et al., in press). Those who reported having not smoked a single cigarette but earned the CO levels higher than 5 ppm were all classified as smoking. Lapse was defined as any slips in smoking within the past seven days. Relapse was defined as having smoked five or more cigarettes per day for at least two consecutive days in the fourth week of the assessment. Those who missed the fourth-week assessment were all treated as having relapsed to smoking.

Data Analyses

Analyses were performed in STATA 11. Baseline data were compared by gender and abstinence status (the seven-day point prevalence abstinence in the fourth week) using Chi-squared (χ2) tests for categorical variables and the Mann–Whitney U tests or independent t-tests for continuous variables. Using the robust standard error option, we estimated linear mixed-effects models (also used as multilevel models and random-coefficient models) to examine whether time (week) and other psychosocial variables would predict each of the nine nicotine withdrawal symptoms. We also used a growth curve model with an unstructured covariance structure of random effects to examine the random slopes (rates of change) of withdrawal symptoms over time for the total sample and individuals (Reinsel, 1982). For this, we used the restricted maximum likelihood option to reduce small-sample biases (Kenward & Roger, 1997). We also examined whether the rates of change of withdrawal symptoms would differ by gender.

Results

Baseline Characteristics by Gender

Many differences were found in demographics and smoking behaviours between female and male smokers (Table 1). Compared with men, women were more likely to be single (χ2 = 10.08, p < 0.01) and to live with a family member who also smoked (χ2 = 7.30, p < 0.05). Women earned much higher scores of depressive symptoms than men (Z = 2.73, p < 0.05). Using the cutoff score of 21 recommended for Koreans, seven women (46.7%) and six men (8.0%) could be classified as depressed (χ2 = 15.1, p = 0.001). Women initiated smoking at older age (Z = 3.17, p < 0.01) and smoked fewer cigarettes per day (Z = 3.20, p < 0.01) than men but the two had no difference in nicotine dependence. Fewer women than men attempted to quit smoking (χ2 = 6.39, p < 0.05) and had 24-hour abstinence in the past year (χ2 = 6.60, p < 0.05). In contrast, no differences were found in any baseline characteristics between the two treatment conditions.

Table 1.

Comparison of demographics and smoking characteristics by gender

Variables (Possible Score Range) Female (N = 15)
Males (N = 75)
Total (N = 90)
N (%)/Mean ± SD N (%)/Mean ± SD N (%)/Mean ± SD
Cultural arm 8 (53.3%) 40 (53.3%) 48 (53.3%)
Age (years) 48.1 ± 9.8 49.9 ± 9.5 49.6 ± 9.5
Married/living with a partner** 7 (46.7%) 63 (84.0%) 70 (77.8%)
Years of education 14.6 ± 2.2 14.7 ± 2.2 14.7 ± 2.2
Full-time employed 11 (73.3%) 65 (86.7%) 76 (84.4%)
Annual family income
 <$40,000 5 (33.3%) 25 (33.3%) 30 (33.3%)
 $40,000–79,999 9 (60.0%) 35 (46.7%) 44 (48.9%)
 ≥$80,000 1 (6.7%) 15 (20.0%) 16 (17.8%)
Religion
 Christianity 10 (66.7%) 48 (64.0%) 58 (64.5%)
 All other religions 0 (0%) 4 (5.3%) 4 (4.4%)
 None 5 (33.3%) 23 (30.7%) 28 (31.1%)
Acculturation (1–5) 2.0 ± 0.6 1.8 ± 0.4 1.8 ± 0.4
Depressive symptoms (0–60)* 17.7 ± 14.4 7.2 ± 8.2 9.0 ± 10.2
Age at smoking onset (years)** 24.1 ± 5.8 19.3 ± 2.8 20.1 ± 3.9
Number of cigarettes smoked per Day** 12.7 ± 3.5 17.4 ± 5.4 16.6 ± 5.5
Nicotine dependence (0–10) 4.7 ± 1.6 4.8 ± 2.1 4.7 ± 2.0
Other smokers in the family ( = yes)* 8 (53.3%) 15 (20.0%) 23 (25.6%)
History of past-year quit attempts ( = yes)* 5 (33.3%) 51 (68.0%) 56 (62.2%)
Any 24-Abstinences in past year quit attempts* 4 (26.7%) 47 (62.7%) 51 (56.7%)
Perceived risks of quitting (1–7) 4.4 ± 0.9 4.4 ± 0.8 4.4 ± 0.8

N = number, SD = standard deviation.

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01.

Six women had menstrual cycles; however, only two of them had a regular cycle (22–35 days) and the remaining four reported irregular cycles such as longer than 35 days and skipped cycles in the past year. Of the two with a regular cycle, one had the quit day in the follicular phase and the other one in the luteal phase. The nine women without menstrual cycles were all post-menopausal and their menopause occurred between the age of 43 and 53 years (M = 47.3, SD = 3.74; median = 47). None had hormone treatments or used contraception at the time of the study.

Treatment Outcomes

At the fourth week assessment, 67 participants reported seven-day point prevalence abstinence but four were classified as smoking because their expired CO levels were in the range of 6 to 20 ppm. Twelve had lapses to smoking and 11 relapsed to smoking. The participants in the cultural arm (40/48, 83.3%) were more likely to be abstinent than those in the standard arm (23/42, 52.4%, χ2 = 8.71, p < 0.01). All women (8/8) and 80.0% of the men (32/40) in the cultural arm achieved abstinence and the difference between women and men was not significant. In contrast, one woman (14.3%) and 22 men (62.9%) in the standard arm were abstinent, which showed a significant difference (χ2 = 5.56, p < 0.05). Individuals who were abstinent were far more likely to be adherent to nicotine patches during the four-week assessment period than those who lapsed or relapsed to smoking (95.2% versus 63.0%; χ2 = 15.9, p < 0.001).

Smoking Withdrawal Symptoms over Time

The relationship between time (week) and withdrawal symptoms was examined by linear mixed models using robust standard errors (data not shown here). Among the nine withdrawal symptoms, craving (p < 0.001) and disturbed sleep (p < 0.05) significantly decreased over time. Difficulty in concentrating and restlessness showed a downward trend whereas appetite showed an upward trend. The remaining four symptoms (irritability/frustration/anger, anxiety, depression, and impatience) did not have a significant effect of time. The total score of the nine withdrawal symptoms showed a significant decline over the four-week assessment period (p < 0.05). However, the change was no longer significant when the score of craving was removed from the total score, which indicated no significant effect of time.

Predictors of Withdrawal Symptoms

Among baseline characteristics, gender, depressive symptoms, and perceived risks of quitting smoking were all significant predictors of the total score of the nine withdrawal symptoms when they were analysed individually. Neither nicotine dependence nor treatment condition was a significant predictor of the symptoms. Due to the significant correlation between gender and depressive symptoms (Spearman’s rho = 0.28, p < 0.01), only gender and perceived risks were entered in multivariate regression analyses while controlling for abstinence status (Table 2). Compared with men, women had higher anxiety, restlessness, and depression symptoms. Individuals who perceived greater risks reported more anxiety and depression symptoms than their counterparts. Those who lapsed/relapsed to smoking had more symptoms of craving, difficulty in concentrating, restlessness, and impatience than those who were abstinent. A separate analysis with baseline depressive symptoms revealed that the variable predicted the following symptoms: irritability/frustration/anger (p < 0.01), difficulty in concentrating (p < 0.01), depression (p < 0.001), disturbed sleep (p < 0.05), and impatience (p < 0.05). The relationships with the first three symptoms remained significant even after controlling for perceived risks of quitting smoking and abstinence status.

Table 2.

Predictors of nicotine withdrawal symptoms by multivariate linear mixed models (N = 90)

Symptom Gender (Women vs. Men) Perceived Risks Abstinence (Yes vs. No)



Regression Coefficient (Robust Standard Error)
Craving 0.099 (0.172) 0.108 (0.088) − 0.454 (0.114)***
Irritability/frustration/anger 0.360 (0.256) 0.184 (0.113) − 0.080 (0.139)
Anxiety 0.603 (0.195)** 0.222 (0.107)* − 0.143 (0.118)
Difficulty in concentrating 0.301 (0.208) 0.180 (0.110) − 0.314 (0.113)**
Restlessness 0.456 (0.228)* 0.178 (0.114) − 0.293 (0.111)**
Increased appetite − 0.040 (0.294) 0.217 (0.117)† − 0.027 (0.157)
Disturbed sleep 0.225 (0.290) 0.207 (0.116)† − 0.184 (0.146)
Depression 0.542 (0.216)* 0.181 (0.077)* − 0.124 (0.100)
Impatience 0.342 (0.224) 0.213 (0.113)† − 0.271 (0.123)*
Total 2.901 (1.465)* 1.705 (0.752)* − 1.742 (0.611)**
†

p < 0.10,

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01, and

***

p < 0.001.

Results of a Random Growth Curve Model

The growth curve model indicated that gender and perceived risks of quitting smoking were significant predictors of changes in the total score of the nine nicotine withdrawal symptoms over time after controlling for abstinence status (Table 3). Women reported significantly higher withdrawal symptoms at the first post-quit week than men. The symptoms increased with perceived risks of quitting smoking but decreased with abstinence. The average weekly rate of changes (the fixed effect of the slope) was not significant; while the random effect of the slope was significant (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.84 to 2.04). In other words, there was no significant effect of time in the change of nicotine withdrawal symptoms for the total sample, but the rates of change varied randomly across individuals. The difference in the average weekly rate of changes of withdrawal symptoms was significant by gender (p = 0.03); women showed a significant decline over time (Z = −2.68, p = 0.007) whereas men showed not much change (Z = −0.66, p = 0.51; Figure 1).

Table 3.

Predictors of the change of nicotine withdrawal symptoms by a random growth curve model (N = 90)

Variables Reg. Coefficient SE Z p-value 95% CI
Women (vs. Men) 4.860 1.662 2.92 0.003 1.603, 8.116
Perceived risks of quitting smoking 1.668 0.574 2.91 0.004 0.543, 2.792
Abstinencea (vs. lapse) − 1.800 0.696 −2.59 0.010 − 3.163, −0.436
Week − 0.167 0.254 −0.66 0.511 − 0.664, 0.331
Women × week − 1.332 0.609 −2.19 0.029 − 2.527, −0.138
Random-effects parameters Estimate SE 95% CI
Participants: unstructured
 SD (week) 1.306 0.296 0.838, 2.037
 Correlation (week, intercept) − 0.598 0.130 −0.796, −0.284

Reg. = regression, SE = Standard error of regression coefficient, CI = confidence interval, SD = standard deviation.

a

7-day point prevalence abstinence.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Linear prediction of nicotine withdrawal symptoms over time by gender, fixed portion.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study examining nicotine withdrawal symptoms in Korean American smokers following quitting. Among the nine withdrawal symptoms listed in the MNWS, craving and disturbed sleep significantly decreased over time whereas the remaining symptoms had no significant effect of time. In this study, we included craving because it is an essential symptom of nicotine withdrawal (Etter & Huges, 2006) and the most frequently reported symptom among Korean American smokers (Kim et al., 2007). Nevertheless, we provided both results with and without craving if the item had caused any differences in findings between the two. Gender and perceived risks of quitting smoking predicted post-quit withdrawal symptoms and their changes over time even after controlling for abstinence status. Women and individuals who perceived greater risks of quitting smoking reported more withdrawal symptoms. The symptoms did not change, on average, with time but the rates of change varied randomly across individuals. In addition, the rates of change were significantly higher for women than men.

Similar to previous studies (Carpenter et al., 2006; Leventhal et al., 2007), Korean American women in this study reported more nicotine withdrawal symptoms related to negative affects (e.g., anxiety and depression) than their male counterparts. Furthermore, women had more depressive symptoms at baseline than men, which supports the pronounced relationship between depression and smoking among female smokers compared with male smokers (Husky et al., 2008). Baseline depressive symptoms also predicted post-quit withdrawal symptoms, which is in support of the notion that negative moods are independent of risk factors for withdrawal symptoms (e.g., Breslau et al., 1992; Johnson, Stewart, Rosenfield, Steeves & Zvolensky, 2012; Leventhal, Ameringer, Osborn, Zvolensky & Langdon, 2013; Pomerleau et al., 2005).

Korean American smokers who anticipated greater risks of quitting smoking reported more severe withdrawal symptoms following quitting than their counterparts. A study with general US smokers who were seeking cessation treatments also found that those with high levels of perceived risks were more likely to experience withdrawal symptoms than their counterparts during the first post-quit week abstinence (Weinberger, Krishnan-Sarin, Mazure & McKee, 2008). Abstinence status among Korean American smokers had a significant association with withdrawal symptoms, which supports the finding among general US smokers (Baker et al., 2012).

Korean American smokers who received a culturally adapted cessation intervention had a higher abstinence rate at the fourth post-quit week than those who received a standard cessation intervention. However, neither treatment condition nor nicotine dependence was assessed by FTND, a predictor of craving or other withdrawal symptoms. Similar to our findings, Robinson et al. (2011) did not find any significant effect of FTND on post-quit withdrawal symptoms. In contrast, Baker and others (2012) found significant relationships between FTND and post-quit craving and negative affect withdrawal symptoms. Both of the two studies (Baker et al., 2012; Robinson et al., 2011) assessed withdrawal symptoms using the Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale (Welsch et al., 1999). More studies are required to determine the effect of nicotine dependence on post-quit withdrawal symptoms.

Findings from the present study should be interpreted with caution because of the following limitations. First, the female sample was relatively small compared with the male one (15 versus 75) and the gender differences founded in this study need to be further validated with large female and male samples. Nevertheless, the main outcome variable ‘nicotine withdrawal symptoms’ was administered four times for each woman, which yielded a total of 53 observations. In addition, we were not able to examine the potential effects of menstruation cycle on withdrawal symptoms due to the small female sample. Studies with large samples of Korean American women will help us understand the potential effect of menstrual cycle on withdrawal symptoms. Second, we did not assess physiological measures to validate self-reported withdrawal symptoms. Third, we did not assess baseline anxiety that may also have a significant effect on post-quit withdrawal symptoms (Johnson et al., 2012). Finally, we did not assess baseline withdrawal symptoms, which might have helped better understand the change of symptoms after quitting.

In spite of the limitations described above, the present study is the first one that examined factors predicting post-quit withdrawal symptoms among Korean American smokers who were receiving psychosocial and pharmacological treatments for smoking cessation. Compared with Korean male smokers, Korean female smokers were more likely to have depressive symptoms at baseline and experience post-quit anxiety, restlessness, and depression symptoms. A qualitative study with Korean American women revealed that they smoke to cope with stresses (Kim, Kim, Seward, Fortuna & McKee, 2013). They may require more intensive treatment whereby they can learn constructive coping strategies to effectively deal with stresses, which may explain in part the poor outcome of the female smokers who received the brief cessation intervention.

Irrespective of gender, Korean American smokers who perceived greater risks of quitting smoking at baseline reported more withdrawal symptoms following quitting. Korean immigrants generally have very limited access to tobacco dependence treatment due to various structural, cultural, and linguistic barriers (Kim et al., in press). Except for three, all participants in this study were first-time treatment seekers who might have experienced severe withdrawal symptoms in their previous quit attempts. They might have anticipated more withdrawal symptoms than those who had never made a quit attempt or who received cessation treatment. Most Korean smokers were unaware of the underlying pharmacological mechanism of nicotine patches and other cessation medications (Kim, Son & Nam, 2005). Clinicians should explain how and why the medications help quit smoking and the importance of medication adherence. This information may reduce Korean American smokers’ perceived risks of quitting and facilitate their medication adherence. In this study, those who were adherent to the medication were more likely to achieve abstinence and reported less severe withdrawal symptoms than their counterparts. Clinicians also need to carefully screen Korean American smokers for depression and other negative mood disorders and advise them to seek treatment for the comorbid conditions.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (5K23DA021243-02 to Dr. Kim) and partially supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA033323-01A1 to Dr. Fang) and (P50DA033945 to Dr. McKee).

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Allen AM, Allen SS, Widenmier J, Al’absi M. Patterns of cortisone and craving by menstrual phase in women attempting to quit smoking. Addictive Behaviors. 2009;34(8):632–635. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.03.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker TB, Piper ME, Schlam TR, Cook JW, Smith SS, Loh WY, et al. Are tobacco dependence and withdrawal related amongst heavy smokers? Relevance to conceptualizations of dependence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2012;121(4):901–921. doi: 10.1037/a0027889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Breslau N, Kilbey MM, Andreski P. Nicotine withdrawal symptoms and psychiatric disorders: Findings from an epidemiologic study of young adults. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1992;149:464–469. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.4.464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caraballo RS, Yee SL, Gfroerer J, Mirza SA. Adult tobacco use among racial and ethnic groups living in the United States, 2002–2005. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2008;5(3):A78. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2008/jul/07_0116.htm. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carpenter MJ, Upadhyaya HP, La Rowe SD, Saladin ME, Brady KT. Menstrual cycle phase effects on nicotine withdrawal and cigarette craving: a review. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2006;8:627–638. doi: 10.1080/14622200600910793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cho MJ, Kim KH. Use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale in Korea. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases. 1998;186:304–310. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199805000-00007. Retrieved March 28, 2013, from http://bs7xv3ec2w.search.serialssolutions.com/?sid=Entrez:PubMed&id=pmid:9612448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cole DM, Beckmann CF, Long CJ, Matthews PM, Durcan MJ, Beaver JD. Nicotine replacement in abstinent smokers improves cognitive withdrawal symptoms with modulation of resting brain network dynamics. Neuroimage. 2010;52:590–599. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Etter JF, Hughes JR. A comparison of the psychometric properties of three cigarette withdrawal scales. Addiction. 2006;101(3):362–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01289.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Liu L, Gracia CR, Nelson DB, Hollander L. Hormones and menopausal status as predictors of depression in women in transition to menopause. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2004;61:62–70. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.1.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gourlay SG, Forbes A, Marriner T, Pethica D, McNeil JJ. Double blind trial of repeated treatment with transdermal nicotine for relapsed smokers. British Medical Journal. 1995;311(7001):363–366. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: A revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. British Journal of Addiction. 1991;86:1119–1127. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hogle JM, Curtin JJ. Sex differences in negative affective response during nicotine withdrawal. Psychophysiology. 2006;43:344–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00406.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hughes JR. Effects of abstinence from tobacco: Valid symptoms and time course. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2007;9:315–327. doi: 10.1080/14622200701188919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hughes JR, Hatsukami DK. Signs and symptoms of tobacco withdrawal. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1986;43:289–294. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800030107013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hughes JR, Keely JP, Niaura RS, Ossip-Klein DJ, Richmond RL, Swan GE. Measures of abstinence in clinical trials: Issues and recommendations. Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2003;5:13–25. doi: 10.1080/1462220031000070552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Husky MM, Mazure CM, Paliwal P, McKee SA. Gender differences in smoking behavior and major depression. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2008;93(1–2):176–179. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.07.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson KA, Stewart S, Rosenfield D, Steeves D, Zvolensky MJ. Prospective evaluation of the effects of anxiety sensitivity and state anxiety in predicting acute nicotine withdrawal symptoms during smoking cessation. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2012;26(2):289–297. doi: 10.1037/a0024133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jorenby DE, Hatsukami DK, Smith SS, Fiore MC, Allen S, Jensen J, et al. Characterization of tobacco withdrawal symptoms: Transdermal nicotine reduces hunger and weight gain. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1996;128:130–138. doi: 10.1007/s002130050118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kenward MG, Roger JH. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics. 1997;53:983–997. doi: 10.2307/2533558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim SS, Fang H, DiFranza J, Ziedonis D, Ma G. Gender differences in the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence in Korean-Americans. Journal of Smoking Cessation. 2012;7:31–36. doi: 10.1017/jsc.2012.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim SS, Gulick EE, Kim SH, Seo HG. Psychometric properties of the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale: A Korean version. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 2007;15(2):121–132. doi: 10.1891/106137407782156354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim SS, Kim S, Fang H, Kwon S, Shelley D, Ziedonis DM. A culturally adapted smoking cessation intervention for Korean-Americans: A mediating effect of perceived family norm toward quitting. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. doi: 10.1007/s10903-014-0045-4. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim SS, Kim S, Seward G, Fortuna L, McKee S. Korean-American women’s experiences with smoking and factors associated with their quit intentions. ISRN Addiction. 2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/796570. Retrived October 23, 2013 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/796570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  24. Kim SS, Son H, Nam KA. The socio-cultural context of Korean-American men’s smoking behavior. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2005;27(5):604–623. doi: 10.1177/0193945905276258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim SS, Ziedonis D, Chen KW. Tobacco use and dependence in Asian Americans: A review of the literature. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2007;9:169–184. doi: 10.1007/s10903-011-9507-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Leventhal AM, Ameringer KJ, Osborn E, Zvolensky MJ, Langdon KJ. Anxiety and depressive symptoms and affective patterns of tobacco withdrawal. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2013;33:324–329. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Leventhal AM, Waters AJ, Boyd S, Moolchan ET, Lerman C, Pickworth WB. Gender differences in acute tobacco withdrawal: Effects on subjective, cognitive, and physiological measures. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2007;15:21–36. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.15.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li S, Kwon SC, Weerasinghe I, Rey MJ, Trinh-Shervin C. Smoking among Asian Americans: Acculturation and gender in the context of tobacco control policies in New York City. Health Promotion Practice. 2013;14(5 Suppl):18S–28S. doi: 10.1177/1524839913485757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. McKee SA, O’Malley SS, Salovey P, Krishnan-Sarin S, Mazure CM. Perceived risks and benefits of smoking cessation: Gender-specific predictors of motivation and treatment outcome. Addictive Behaviors. 2005;30:423–435. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Menossi HS, Goudriaan AE, de Azevedo-Marques Périco C, Nicastri S, de Andrade AG, D’Elia G, et al. Neural bases of pharmacological treatment of nicotine dependence – insights from functional brain imaging: A systematic review. CNS Drug. 2013;27:921–941. doi: 10.1007/s40263-013-0092-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Park SM, Son KY, Lee YJ, Lee HC, Kang JH, Lee YJ, et al. A preliminary investigation of early smoking initiation and nicotine dependence in Korean adults. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2004;74:197–203. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pauly JR. Gender differences in tobacco smoking dynamics and the neuropharmacological actions of nicotine. Frontiers in Bioscience. 2008;1:505–516. doi: 10.2741/2696. doi:org/10.2741/2696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pomerleau CS, Brouwer RJ, Pomerleau OF. Emergence of depression during early abstinence in depressed and non-depressed women smokers. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 2001;20:73–80. doi: 10.1300/J069v20n01_07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pomerleau OF, Pomerleau CS, Mehringer AM, Snedecor SM, Ninowski R, Sen A. Nicotine dependence, depression, and gender: characterizing phenotypes based on withdrawal discomfort, response to smoking, and ability to abstain. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2005;7:91–102. doi: 10.1080/14622200412331328466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pomerleau CS, Tate JC, Lumley MA, Pomerleau OF. Gender differences in prospectively versus retrospectively assessed smoking withdrawal symptoms. Journal of Substance Use. 1994;6(4):433–440. doi: 10.1016/S0899-3289(94)90376-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Radloff L. The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1:385–401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Reinsel G. Multivariate repeated-measurement or growth curve models with multivariate random-effects covariance structure. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1982;77(377):190–195. doi: 10.2307/2287788. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Robinson JD, Lam CY, Carter BL, Minnix JA, Cui Y, Versace F, et al. A multimodal approach to assessing the impact of nicotine dependence, nicotine abstinence, and craving on negative affect in smokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2011;19:40–52. doi: 10.1037/a0022114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Shiffman S, West RJ, Gilbert DG Society of Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT) Work Group on the Assessment of Craving and Withdrawal in Clinical Trials. Recommendation for the assessment of tobacco craving and withdrawal in smoking cessation trials. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2004;6:599–614. doi: 10.1080/14622200410001734067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Alcohol consumption measures. In: Allen JP, Wilson VB, editors. Assessing Alcohol Problems: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism; 2003. pp. 75–99. [Google Scholar]
  41. Suinn RM, Rickard-Figueroa K, Lew S, Vigil P. The Suinn–Lew Asian Self- Identity Acculturation Scale: An initial report. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1987;47:401–407. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1912.1995.tb00269.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Toll BA, Salovey P, O’Malley SS, Mazure CM, Latimer A, McKee SA. Message framing for smoking cessation: The integration of risk perceptions and gender. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2008;10:195–200. doi: 10.1080/14622200701767803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Weinberger AH, Desai RA, McKee SA. Nicotine withdrawal in US smokers with current mood, anxiety, alcohol use, and substance use disorders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2010;108:7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Weinberger AH, Krishnan-Sarin S, Mazure CM, McKee SA. Relationship of perceived risks of smoking cessation to symptoms of withdrawal, craving, and depression during short-term smoking abstinence. Addictive Behaviors. 2008;33:960–963. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Weinberger AH, Mazure CM, McKee SA. Perceived risks and benefits of quitting smoking in non-treatment seekers. Addiction Research & Theory. 2008;18:456–463. doi: 10.3109/16066350903145072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Weinberger AH, Pilver CE, Desai RA, Mazure CM, McKee SA. The relationship of major depressive disorder and gender to change in smoking for current and former smokers: longitudinal evaluation in the US population. Addiction. 2012;107:1847–1856. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Welsch SK, Smith SS, Wetter DW, Jorenby DE, Fiore MC, Baker TB. Development and validation of the Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 1999;7(4):354–361. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.7.4.354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Xu J, Azizian A, Monterosso J, Domier CP, Brody AL, Fong TW, et al. Gender effects on mood and cigarette craving during early abstinence and resumption of smoking. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2008;10:1653–1661. doi: 10.1080/14622200802412929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES