Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
letter
. 2015 Oct;65(639):512. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X686857

Low vitamin D prevalence at the GP practice

Lee Wah Phin 1, John Holden 2
PMCID: PMC4582852  PMID: 26412816

There was recently a recommendation by the Scientific Advisory Committee on nutrition that suggests everyone from the age of 1 year should take vitamin D supplements.1 The plan is still in consultation, but it highlights the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the population.2 We have conducted a study of the prevalence of low vitamin D at Garswood general practice surgery, in Northwest England. We took the value of 75 nmol/l as the cut-off for low in vitamin D level. A total of 302 patients had their vitamin D level checked, of which an average of 90% across all age groups had low vitamin D.

The findings correlates with a global meta-analysis study, where close to 90% of the samples had levels <75 nmol/l, although variability exists across region, sex and age.3 We used the 75 nmol/l level as a cut-off as a matter of simplicity for comparison, but we are aware of the ambiguity that still exists about the absolute cut-off level defined as low vitamin D.45 In view of the recent findings and recommendation, we believe we should look into devising a systematic way of screening and supplementing everyone with vitamin D.

REFERENCES


Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES