Abstract
Phospholipases are widely occurring and can be found in several different organisms, including bacteria, yeast, plants, animals, and viruses. Phospholipase C (PLC) is a class of phospholipases that cleaves phospholipids on the diacylglycerol (DAG) side of the phosphodiester bond producing DAGs and phosphomonoesters. Among PLCs, phosphoinositide-specific PLC (PI-PLC) constitutes an important step in the inositide signaling pathways. The structures of PI-PLC isozymes show conserved domains as well as regulatory specific domains. This is important, as most PI-PLCs share a common mechanism, but each of them has a peculiar role and can have a specific cell distribution that is linked to a specific function. More importantly, the regulation of PLC isozymes is fundamental in health and disease, as there are several PLC-dependent molecular mechanisms that are associated with the activation or inhibition of important physiopathological processes. Moreover, PI-PLC alternative splicing variants can play important roles in complex signaling networks, not only in cancer but also in other diseases. That is why PI-PLC isozymes are now considered as important molecules that are essential for better understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying both physiology and pathogenesis, and are also potential molecular targets useful for the development of innovative therapeutic strategies.
Keywords: signal transduction, enzyme regulation, function
Phospholipases are quite common enzymes that are present in a broad range of organisms, including bacteria, yeast, plants, animals, and viruses. Phospholipase C (PLC) constitutes a class of enzymes that cleave phospholipids on the diacylglycerol (DAG) side of the phosphodiester bond. In plants, a phosphatidylcholine-specific PLC (PC-PLC) has been recently identified: this PLC acts preferentially on phosphatidylcholine, even though it can also act upon other lipids, such as phosphatidylethanolamine, therefore giving rise to a class of nonspecific PLCs (1, 2). PC-PLC isoforms are responsible for phosphatidylcholine hydrolysis, producing phosphocholine and DAG, and they have been isolated but not yet cloned from mammalian sources. However, accruing evidence points to multiple implications of these enzymes in cell signaling through MAPK and oncogene-activated protein kinase pathways, as well as programmed cell death, activation of immune cells, and stem cell differentiation (3). On the other hand, phosphoinositide-specific PLC (PI-PLC) enzymes utilize phosphoinositides as a specific substrate and their metabolism is implicated in a large series of signal transduction pathways.
This review is devoted to highlighting PI-PLC, which plays an important role in cell physiology and particularly in signal transduction pathways in mammals. Thirteen kinds of mammalian PI-PLCs are classified into six isotypes (β, γ, δ, ε, ζ, η), according to their structure. Here, we shall point at the molecular features, function, regulation, and splicing variants of these enzymes and discuss their role in disease.
MOLECULAR FEATURES OF PI-PLC
PI-PLC hydrolyzes phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to produce DAG and inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) (Fig. 1) which, in turn, activate protein kinase C (PKC) and induce the release of calcium ions from intracellular stores, respectively (4, 5). Since the first report of PI-PLC existence (6), 13 mammal PI-PLC isozymes have been identified and, at a molecular level, they can be divided into six subgroups: PI-PLCβ(1–4), -γ(1 and 2), -δ(1, 3, and 4), -ε, -ζ, and -η(1 and 2). Interestingly, the structure of these PI-PLC isozymes shows highly conserved domains as well as peculiar characteristics (Fig. 2). In fact, the X and Y domains are two highly conserved regions, whereas the C2 domain, the EF-hand motif, and the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain are regulatory domains that are mingled in a specific manner in PI-PLC subtypes (7). Therefore, each PI-PLC isozyme shows a unique combination of X-Y and regulatory domains, so that each PI-PLC isozyme can have a different regulation, function, and tissue distribution (8).
Fig. 1.
PI-PLC-mediated enzymatic reaction. PIP2, which is located within the plasma membrane, is cleaved by PI-PLC enzymes, generating the two well-known second messengers, DAG and IP3. DAG remains bound to the plasma membrane, whereas IP3 is located within the cytosol, but both of them can act as second messengers and activate downstream targets.
Fig. 2.
Molecular structure of PI-PLC isozymes. Each PI-PLC subfamily is characterized by a different pattern and function of PH, EF, X, Y, and C2 domains. In particular, the PH domain of PI-PLCβ enzymes is bound to G proteins, whereas the same PH domain in PI-PLCγ and PI-PLCδ enzymes interacts with PIP3, in order to activate PI3K or favor the membrane binding, respectively. Moreover, the region between the X and Y domains is important for calcium regulation: in PI-PLCζ and PI-PLCη enzymes this region is important for calcium release and sensitivity, while in PI-PLCγ enzymes there are additional specific domains that are important for calcium interaction. As for PI-PLCε enzymes, there are additional RA domains that interact with RAS and modulate both enzyme translocation and inhibition.
The X and Y domains are usually located between the EF-hand motif and the C2 domain, and are composed of α-helices alternated to β-strands, with a structure that is similar to an incomplete triose phosphate isomerase α/β-barrel (9).
Conversely, the PH domain, although being a membrane-phospholipid binding region along with the C2 domain, has other specific functions according to the different isozymes. For instance, in PI-PLCδ1, the PH domain binds PIP2 and contributes to the access of PI-PLCδ1 onto the membrane surface (10). On the other hand, the PH domain specifically binds the heterotrimeric Gβγ subunit in PI-PLCβ2 and PI-PLCβ3 isozymes (11), and mediates interactions with phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3) in PI-PLCγ1, where it is required for inducing a phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent translocation and activation (12). As for this latter, it is worthwhile to note that PI-PLCγ1 and PI-PLCγ2 isozymes contain an additional PH domain, which is split by two tandem Src homology (SH)2 and SH3 domains, in order to interact directly with the calcium-related transient receptor potential cation channel 3, thereby providing a direct coupling mechanism between PI-PLCγ and agonist-induced calcium entry (13).
Finally, the C2 and EF-hand motifs are important for the regulation of calcium: the EF-hand motifs, in particular, are helix-turn-helix structural domains that bind calcium ions in order to enhance the PI-PLC enzymatic activity (14, 15).
As described above, the PI-PLC isozymes have peculiar molecular features, with common conserved domains and specific regulatory domains. Interestingly, among the PI-PLC isoenzymes, PI-PLCβ subtypes distinguish themselves also by the presence of an elongated C terminus, consisting of about 450 residues, which contains many of the determinants for the interaction with Gq alpha subunit as well as for other functions, such as membrane binding and nuclear localization (16–18).
FUNCTION AND REGULATION
The activation and regulation of PI-PLC isozymes differ in their subtype. For instance, PI-PLCβ enzymes are usually activated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) through several mechanisms, while PI-PLCγ subtypes are commonly activated by receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), via SH2 domain-phospho-tyrosine interaction (8).
Indeed, the regulation of PI-PLCβ isozymes is peculiar. Most of them may have a high guanosine triphosphatase activating protein (GAP) activity, but not PI-PLCβ1, that can also be regulated by a distinct binding region to phosphatidic acid or is specifically activated by MAPK, therefore playing important roles in cell metabolism (19–23). Upon PI-PLCβ1 activation in the nucleus, IP3 generation occurs (Fig. 3). IP3 acts as a substrate for inositol polyphosphate multikinase (IPMK), which is located in the nucleus and gives rise to higher inositol phosphates (24).
Fig. 3.
Function and regulation of PI-PLC isozymes. Most of the PI-PLC isozymes play a role at the plasma membrane. PI-PLCβ enzymes are usually activated by GPCRs through several mechanisms, while PI-PLCγ subtypes are commonly activated by RTK, via SH2 domain-phospho-tyrosine interaction. It is important to note that a specific PI-PLCβ enzyme, that is PI-PLCβ1, can be activated by MAPK and translocate to the nucleus, where it is involved in specific signaling pathways involving IPMK and gene promoter regulation. On the other hand, PI-PLCε isoenzymes can be activated by both GPCR and RTK systems, with distinct activation mechanisms, whereas both PI-PLCδ1 and PI-PLCη1 are activated via a GPCR-mediated calcium mobilization. As for PI-PLCζ, its activation and nuclear translocation mechanisms remain unknown, but it has been described as a sperm-specific protein that, at the nuclear level, has been specifically connected with the molecular activation of oocytes following fertilization in zygotic interphase.
Moreover, except for PI-PLCβ4, PI-PLCβ isozymes can also be activated by Gβγ dimers (25–28), and the relative sensitivity of PI-PLCβ isozymes to Gβγ subunits differs from that to Gqα subunits, with PI-PLCβ1 being the least sensitive to Gβγ (25, 26).
Although not fully understood, PI-PLCγ1 regulatory mechanisms involve polypeptide growth factor receptors that bind to RTKs, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR). Besides this, the SH2 domains of PI-PLCγ1 can also mediate the binding to auto-phosphorylated tyrosine residues within the intracellular region of the receptor (29). Moreover, it is remarkable that PI-PLCγ1 can also be activated downstream of a series of receptors that lack intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity, including the angiotensin II and bradykinin receptors, cytokine receptors, and the T cell receptor (30–33). This is also the case for PI-PLCγ2, that can be activated downstream of immunoglobulin and adhesion receptors on immune cells, such as B-cells, platelets, and mast cells, by nonreceptor tyrosine kinases interacting with other membrane-localized molecular signaling pathways (34–36).
Interestingly, PI-PLCε isoenzymes can be activated by both GPCR and RTK systems, with distinct activation mechanisms (37). Indeed, several GPCR ligands, such as lipoprotein A, thrombin, and endothelin, can activate PI-PLCε, but PI-PLCε also associates with Rap and translocates to the perinuclear area, where it interacts with activated RTKs (38).
As for PI-PLCδ1 and PI-PLCη1, they are activated via GPCR-mediated calcium mobilization. In particular, the PI-PLCδ1 isozyme is one of the most sensitive enzymes to calcium, suggesting that its activity is directly regulated by calcium (39, 40), whereas PI-PLCη1 specifically acts as a calcium sensor during the formation and maintenance of the neuronal network in the postnatal brain (41). Moreover, both PI-PLCδ1 and PI-PLCη1 subtypes are involved in the positive feedback signal amplification of PI-PLC (39, 42). Indeed, the overall PI-PLC activity may be amplified and sustained by both intracellular calcium mobilization and extracellular calcium entry, through either a negative or a positive feedback amplification of PI-PLC signaling (43–46).
All in all, it has been suggested that PI-PLCβ and PI-PLCγ isoenzymes (primary PI-PLCs) are primarily activated by extracellular stimuli. On the contrary, secondary PI-PLCs, such as PI-PLCε, are activated by Rho and Ras GTPases, while the activation of other secondary PI-PLCs (mainly PI-PLCδ1 and PI-PLCη1) might be enhanced by intracellular calcium mobilization that amplifies the PI-PLCs activity. As for PI-PLCζ, its activation and nuclear translocation mechanisms remain unknown (Fig. 3).
SPLICING VARIANTS OF PI-PLC
Alternative splicing variants have been reported for several of PI-PLC isozymes, including human and rat PI-PLCβ1, human PI-PLCβ2, rat PI-PLCβ4, rat PI-PLCδ4, and human PI-PLCε (47–52).
Indeed, two splicing variants of the PI-PLCβ1 isozyme have been identified both in rat and mouse, and they differ in their C-terminal sequences (48). As for the human PI-PLCβ1 gene, also in this case there are two alternative splicing variants, with PI-PLCβ1a containing a putative nuclear localization sequence and a nuclear export sequence region and PI-PLCβ1b showing only a putative nuclear localization sequence. Therefore, these variants of PI-PLCβ1 may differ in their cellular localization, suggesting that the transit in and out of the nucleus is finely regulated, and possibly hinting at a different role for these two splicing variants (47).
Also, human PI-PLCβ2 shows two splicing variants: PI-PLCβ2a and PI-PLCβ2b, differing in 15 amino acid residues at the C-terminal region, so that the second transcript variant results in a shorter protein (49, 53).
Interestingly, several alterative splicing variants of the PI-PLCβ4 gene have been reported: two alternative splicing variants were identified from rat and bovine brain (50, 54), while the third splicing variant of rat PI-PLCβ4 has an additional 37 nucleotide exon at the C-terminal region (55). In humans there are also three alternative splicing variants of the PI-PLCβ4 gene, so that variant 1 lacks an internal segment and has a longer and distinct C terminus, variant 2 lacks an alternate in-frame exon in the central coding region, and variant 3 represents the longest transcript (55).
Altogether, all PI-PLCβ genes have at least two alternative splicing variants, which differ mostly in their C-terminal sequences and potentially play different roles in cellular processes.
Also human PI-PLCγ1 gene has two alternative splicing variants that differ in their C-terminal sequences, but in this case the precise function of the two alternative splicing variants is still unknown (56).
Alternative splicing variants of PI-PLCδ isozymes show several different patterns of splicing variants. Indeed, mouse PI-PLCδ1b differs from PI-PLCδ1a by 274 amino acid residues that extend from the catalytic Y domain to the stop sequence, which are replaced with 21 distinct amino acid residues. Moreover, mouse PI-PLCδ1b has a truncated catalytic Y domain, which implies that this variant may have no enzymatic activity. Also, the human PI-PLCδ1 gene has two splicing variants, and the second variant contains an alternate 5′-terminal exon that results in a shorter isoform and a different N terminus, as compared with the wild-type sequence (57).
As for PI-PLCδ4 gene, only the mouse gene shows alternative splicing variants. Two splicing variants have been well-characterized and seem to be functional, whereas the third showed no catalytic activity. In particular, the second variant is slightly different from the wild-type isoform in the 5′-untranslated region but includes an alternate in-frame exon in the coding region, thus resulting in a longer protein that, however, has the same N and C termini as compared with the wild-type isoform. As for the third isoform, it lacks the linker region between X and Y domains, and instead, contains 32 additional amino acids, so that this isoform shows no catalytic activity (58).
Three splicing variants of the human PI-PLCε1 gene have been reported, with the second variant showing a different N-terminal region, and the third variant using an alternate in-frame splice site in the coding region that results in a shorter protein (52).
As for the PI-PLCζ gene, in this case an alternative splicing variant, named s-PI-PLCζ, has been recently reported (59): structurally, it contains two internal stop codons at the N terminus and lacks one and a half of the EF-hand motifs; functionally, this splicing variant does not affect calcium oscillations.
Finally, three splicing variants of the PI-PLCη1 gene have been reported in both humans and mice (60), whereas five alternative splicing variants of the PI-PLCη2 gene are reported in humans, and in mice there are three of them (61).
PI-PLC IN DISEASE
Given their peculiar roles and their fine regulation in physiology, alterations affecting PI-PLC isozymes have been associated with several diseases that can target different tissues and organs (62–65).
For instance, PI-PLCβ1 plays an important role in brain function and is thus associated with brain disorders (66). In fact, it is highly expressed in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, lateral septum, and olfactory bulb (67, 68), where it regulates both cortical development and synaptic plasticity by specifically modulating hippocampal muscarinic acetylcholine receptor signaling. Moreover, a PI-PLCβ1 gene deletion was observed in orbito-frontal cortex samples from human patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorders (69–71), and patients with these diseases also showed an abnormal expression pattern of PI-PLCβ1 in specific brain areas (66).
PI-PLCβ isozymes also participate in the differentiation and activation of immune cells that control both the innate and adaptive immune systems (72). In particular, loss of both PI-PLCβ2 and PI-PLCβ3 isozymes is associated with an impaired T-cell migration that is caused by an inability to increase the intracellular calcium. Interestingly, human T-cells from elderly people show a reduced expression of PI-PLCβ2, suggesting that a specific impairment of this enzyme in aged T lymphocytes might contribute to the immune suppression mechanisms in this group of people (72, 73). Moreover, PI-PLCβ2 downregulation plays an important role in M1-M2 macrophage differentiation, whereas PI-PLCβ3 activity is essential for promoting macrophage survival, especially in atherosclerotic plaques, so that PI-PLCβ3 could be a potential specific molecular target for the treatment of atherosclerosis (74).
PI-PLCβ3 deficiency is also linked to the development of myeloproliferative neoplasm in mice. In fact, aged PI-PLCβ3-null mice typically have increased numbers of hematopoietic stem cells and myeloid progenitors in bone marrow and spleen, and their hematopoietic stem cells show an increased proliferation and a reduced apoptosis that have been molecularly associated with Stat5 inhibition (75).
Within the hematological field, not only PI-PLCβ3, but also other PI-PLCβ isozymes have been demonstrated to play a role in the pathophysiology of hematologic diseases (76–79). Indeed, the PI-PLCβ1 gene has been associated with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), not only because its lack is linked to MDS progression toward acute myeloid leukemia (80, 81), but also because its expression is regulated by epigenetic mechanisms (82–85). Moreover, PI-PLCβ enzymes have also been implicated in leukemias. In particular, the molecular interaction between PI-PLCβ enzymes and G proteins that induces PI-PLCβ to localize in the cytosol or at the nuclear level has been demonstrated to be determined by the intervention of a binding partner: TRAX (translin-associated protein X), i.e., a nuclease and part of the machinery involved in RNA interference processes (86).
Among the PI-PLC isozymes, PI-PLCγ is important because it can play a specific key role in cell migration and invasion, therefore contributing to carcinogenesis. Indeed, PI-PLCγ is an important enzyme that regulates cell metabolism, so that at first its molecular targeting has been considered as a possible new therapeutic strategy. However, it has been difficult to find specific PI-PLCγ inhibitors that can be effective in cancer treatment. That is why scientists are now trying to identify new specific interacting partners that could become new therapeutic targets for cancer therapy (87). On the other hand, other PI-PLC isozymes have also been demonstrated to play important roles in cancer. This is the case for PI-PLCε, that is specifically linked to tumor suppression (88, 89), mainly in colorectal cancer, where its reduction is associated with a more aggressive disease (90).
PI-PLC isozymes are not only associated with cancer, but their deregulation is also implicated in other diseases and disorders. Another important role for a PI-PLC isozyme has indeed been recently discovered in infertility, where PI-PLCζ, a sperm-specific protein, has been specifically connected with the molecular activation of oocytes following fertilization (91). In fact, the earliest event subsequent to gamete fusion is the onset of a series of intracellular calcium oscillations within the oocyte, which modulate several molecular processes that are known as “oocyte activation”, and together, they represent a fundamental mechanism for the early embryonic development. Importantly, all of these processes are initiated and controlled by calcium release from ooplasmic sources during zygotic interphase in response to PI-PLCζ activity, via the IP3 pathway, thus activating nuclear transport receptors. That is why a correlation between certain types of male infertility and the aberrant expression, localization, structure, and function of PI-PLCζ in human sperm has been determined. The potential therapeutic role of PI-PLCζ could therefore be linked to the identification of male patients that are deficient in PI-PLCζ, and for them an alternative therapeutic approach, based on assisted reproductive technology, could be useful for rescuing the impaired oocyte activation (92).
As for the other PI-PLC isozymes, PI-PLCδ enzymes are a peculiar example of enzymes playing several roles in different tissues and organs. Indeed, PI-PLCδ1 and PI-PLCδ3 share a high sequence homology, so that they can play redundant roles in various tissues. In fact, PI-PLCδ1 is required for the maintenance of homeostasis in skin and metabolic tissues, while PI-PLCδ3 specifically regulates microvilli formation in enterocytes and the radial migration of neurons in the cerebral cortex of the developing brain. Furthermore, it has been shown that the simultaneous loss of PI-PLCδ1 and PI-PLCδ3 in mice causes placental vascular defects, thus leading to embryonic lethality (93).
CONCLUSIONS
PI-PLC isozymes play essential roles in cell metabolism, by regulating calcium and other intracellular signaling pathways that are important for cell proliferation and differentiation. This means that these enzymes have the capability to influence normal and pathological conditions. This is particularly important, because the regulation of PI-PLCs or PI-PLC-dependent signaling pathways can be important for understanding both the normal cellular physiology and the pathogenesis of important diseases, possibly leading to the development of innovative therapeutic strategies or the comprehension of new molecular processes.
Footnotes
Abbreviations:
- DAG
- diacylglycerol
- GPCR
- G protein-coupled receptor
- IP3
- inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate
- IPMK
- inositol polyphosphate multikinase
- MDS
- myelodysplastic syndrome
- PC-PLC
- phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C
- PDGFR
- platelet-derived growth factor receptor
- PH
- pleckstrin homology
- PI3K
- phosphoinositide 3-kinase
- PIP2
- phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate
- PIP3
- phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate
- PI-PLC
- phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C
- PKC
- protein kinase C
- PLC
- phospholipase C
- RTK
- receptor tyrosine kinase
- SH
- Src homology
REFERENCES
- 1.Nakamura Y., Awai K., Masuda T., Yoshioka Y., Takamiya K., Ohta H. 2005. A novel phosphatidylcholine-hydrolyzing phospholipase C induced by phosphate starvation in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 7469–7476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Peters C., Li M., Narasimhan R., Roth M., Welti R., Wang X. 2010. Nonspecific phospholipase C NPC4 promotes responses to abscisic acid and tolerance to hyperosmotic stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 22: 2642–2659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Abalsamo L., Spadaro F., Bozzuto G., Paris L., Cecchetti S., Lugini L., Iorio E., Molinari A., Ramoni C., Podo F. 2012. Inhibition of phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C results in loss of mesenchymal traits in metastatic breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. 14: R50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Poli A., Mongiorgi S., Cocco L., Follo M. Y. 2014. Protein kinase C involvement in cell cycle modulation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 42: 1471–1476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Follo M. Y., Manzoli L., Poli A., McCubrey J. A., Cocco L. 2015. PLC and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signalling in disease and cancer. Adv. Biol. Regul. 57: 10–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hokin L. E., Hokin M. R. 1953. The incorporation of 32P into the nucleotides of ribonucleic acid in pigeon pancreas slices. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 11: 591–592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yang Y. R., Follo M. Y., Cocco L., Suh P. G. 2013. The physiological roles of primary phospholipase C. Adv. Biol. Regul. 53: 232–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rhee S. G. 2001. Regulation of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70: 281–312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Essen L. O., Perisic O., Cheung R., Katan M., Williams R. L. 1996. Crystal structure of a mammalian phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C delta. Nature. 380: 595–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Paterson H. F., Savopoulos J. W., Perisic O., Cheung R., Ellis M. V., Williams R. L., Katan M. 1995. Phospholipase C delta 1 requires a pleckstrin homology domain for interaction with the plasma membrane. Biochem. J. 312: 661–666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang T., Dowal L., El-Maghrabi M. R., Rebecchi M., Scarlata S. 2000. The pleckstrin homology domain of phospholipase C-beta(2) links the binding of gbetagamma to activation of the catalytic core. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 7466–7469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Falasca M., Logan S. K., Lehto V. P., Baccante G., Lemmon M. A., Schlessinger J. 1998. Activation of phospholipase C gamma by PI 3-kinase-induced PH domain-mediated membrane targeting. EMBO J. 17: 414–422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wen W., Yan J., Zhang M. 2006. Structural characterization of the split pleckstrin homology domain in phospholipase C-gamma1 and its interaction with TRPC3. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 12060–12068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nakashima S., Banno Y., Watanabe T., Nakamura Y., Mizutani T., Sakai H., Zhao Y., Sugimoto Y., Nozawa Y. 1995. Deletion and site-directed mutagenesis of EF-hand domain of phospholipase C-delta 1: effects on its activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 211: 365–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Otterhag L., Sommarin M., Pical C. 2001. N-terminal EF-hand-like domain is required for phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C activity in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 497: 165–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rhee S. G. 2013. Reflections on the days of phospholipase C. Adv. Biol. Regul. 53: 223–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rebecchi M. J., Pentyala S. N. 2000. Structure, function, and control of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C. Physiol. Rev. 80: 1291–1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Drin G., Scarlata S. 2007. Stimulation of phospholipase Cbeta by membrane interactions, interdomain movement, and G protein binding–how many ways can you activate an enzyme? Cell. Signal. 19: 1383–1392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ross E. M., Mateu D., Gomes A. V., Arana C., Tran T., Litosch I. 2006. Structural determinants for phosphatidic acid regulation of phospholipase C-beta1. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 33087–33094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cockcroft S., Garner K. 2013. Potential role for phosphatidylinositol transfer protein (PITP) family in lipid transfer during phospholipase C signalling. Adv. Biol. Regul. 53: 280–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sánchez-Fernández G., Cabezudo S., García-Hoz C., Benincá C., Aragay A. M., Mayor F., Jr, Ribas C. 2014. Galphaq signalling: the new and the old. Cell. Signal. 26: 833–848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Faenza I., Billi A. M., Follo M. Y., Fiume R., Martelli A. M., Cocco L., Manzoli L. 2005. Nuclear phospholipase C signaling through type 1 IGF receptor and its involvement in cell growth and differentiation. Anticancer Res. 25: 2039–2041. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Martelli A. M., Fiume R., Faenza I., Tabellini G., Evangelista C., Bortul R., Follo M. Y., Fala F., Cocco L. 2005. Nuclear phosphoinositide specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC)-beta 1: a central intermediary in nuclear lipid-dependent signal transduction. Histol. Histopathol. 20: 1251–1260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Blind R. D. 2014. Disentangling biological signaling networks by dynamic coupling of signaling lipids to modifying enzymes. Adv. Biol. Regul. 54: 25–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Park D., Jhon D. Y., Lee C. W., Ryu S. H., Rhee S. G. 1993. Removal of the carboxyl-terminal region of phospholipase C-beta 1 by calpain abolishes activation by G alpha q. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 3710–3714. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Smrcka A. V., Sternweis P. C. 1993. Regulation of purified subtypes of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C beta by G protein alpha and beta gamma subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 9667–9674. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Camps M., Carozzi A., Schnabel P., Scheer A., Parker P. J., Gierschik P. 1992. Isozyme-selective stimulation of phospholipase C-beta 2 by G protein beta gamma-subunits. Nature. 360: 684–686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee C. W., Lee K. H., Lee S. B., Park D., Rhee S. G. 1994. Regulation of phospholipase C-beta 4 by ribonucleotides and the alpha subunit of Gq. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 25335–25338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kamat A., Carpenter G. 1997. Phospholipase C-gamma1: regulation of enzyme function and role in growth factor-dependent signal transduction. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 8: 109–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Marrero M. B., Paxton W. G., Schieffer B., Ling B. N., Bernstein K. E. 1996. Angiotensin II signalling events mediated by tyrosine phosphorylation. Cell. Signal. 8: 21–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Venema V. J., Ju H., Sun J., Eaton D. C., Marrero M. B., Venema R. C. 1998. Bradykinin stimulates the tyrosine phosphorylation and bradykinin B2 receptor association of phospholipase C gamma 1 in vascular endothelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 246: 70–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sozzani P., Hasan L., Seguelas M. H., Caput D., Ferrara P., Pipy B., Cambon C. 1998. IL-13 induces tyrosine phosphorylation of phospholipase C gamma-1 following IRS-2 association in human monocytes: relationship with the inhibitory effect of IL-13 on ROI production. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 244: 665–670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Espagnolle N., Depoil D., Zaru R., Demeur C., Champagne E., Guiraud M., Valitutti S. 2007. CD2 and TCR synergize for the activation of phospholipase Cgamma1/calcium pathway at the immunological synapse. Int. Immunol. 19: 239–248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kurosaki T., Maeda A., Ishiai M., Hashimoto A., Inabe K., Takata M. 2000. Regulation of the phospholipase C-gamma2 pathway in B cells. Immunol. Rev. 176: 19–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Watson S. P., Auger J. M., McCarty O. J., Pearce A. C. 2005. GPVI and integrin alphaIIb beta3 signaling in platelets. J. Thromb. Haemost. 3: 1752–1762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wen R., Jou S. T., Chen Y., Hoffmeyer A., Wang D. 2002. Phospholipase C gamma 2 is essential for specific functions of Fc epsilon R and Fc gamma R. J. Immunol. 169: 6743–6752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Smrcka A. V., Brown J. H., Holz G. G. 2012. Role of phospholipase Cepsilon in physiological phosphoinositide signaling networks. Cell. Signal. 24: 1333–1343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jin T. G., Satoh T., Liao Y., Song C., Gao X., Kariya K., Hu C. D., Kataoka T. 2001. Role of the CDC25 homology domain of phospholipase Cepsilon in amplification of Rap1-dependent signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 30301–30307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kim Y. H., Park T. J., Lee Y. H., Baek K. J., Suh P. G., Ryu S. H., Kim K. T. 1999. Phospholipase C-delta1 is activated by capacitative calcium entry that follows phospholipase C-beta activation upon bradykinin stimulation. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 26127–26134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Allen V., Swigart P., Cheung R., Cockcroft S., Katan M. 1997. Regulation of inositol lipid-specific phospholipase cdelta by changes in Ca2+ ion concentrations. Biochem. J. 327: 545–552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cockcroft S. 2006. The latest phospholipase C, PLCeta, is implicated in neuronal function. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31: 4–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cho J. H., Yoon M. S., Koo J. B., Kim Y. S., Lee K. S., Lee J. H., Han J. S. 2011. The progesterone receptor as a transcription factor regulates phospholipase D1 expression through independent activation of protein kinase A and Ras during 8-Br-cAMP-induced decidualization in human endometrial stromal cells. Biochem. J. 436: 181–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Okubo Y., Kakizawa S., Hirose K., Iino M. 2001. Visualization of IP(3) dynamics reveals a novel AMPA receptor-triggered IP(3) production pathway mediated by voltage-dependent Ca(2+) influx in Purkinje cells. Neuron. 32: 113–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Thore S., Dyachok O., Gylfe E., Tengholm A. 2005. Feedback activation of phospholipase C via intracellular mobilization and store-operated influx of Ca2+ in insulin-secreting beta-cells. J. Cell Sci. 118: 4463–4471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Thore S., Dyachok O., Tengholm A. 2004. Oscillations of phospholipase C activity triggered by depolarization and Ca2+ influx in insulin-secreting cells. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 19396–19400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Young K. W., Nash M. S., Challiss R. A., Nahorski S. R. 2003. Role of Ca2+ feedback on single cell inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate oscillations mediated by G-protein-coupled receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 20753–20760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Peruzzi D., Aluigi M., Manzoli L., Billi A. M., Di Giorgio F. P., Morleo M., Martelli A. M., Cocco L. 2002. Molecular characterization of the human PLC beta1 gene. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1584: 46–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bahk Y. Y., Song H., Baek S. H., Park B. Y., Kim H., Ryu S. H., Suh P. G. 1998. Localization of two forms of phospholipase C-beta1, a and b, in C6Bu-1 cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1389: 76–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mao G. F., Kunapuli S. P., Koneti Rao A. 2000. Evidence for two alternatively spliced forms of phospholipase C-beta2 in haematopoietic cells. Br. J. Haematol. 110: 402–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kim M. J., Min D. S., Ryu S. H., Suh P. G. 1998. A cytosolic, galphaq- and betagamma-insensitive splice variant of phospholipase C-beta4. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 3618–3624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lee S. B., Rhee S. G. 1996. Molecular cloning, splice variants, expression, and purification of phospholipase C-delta 4. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 25–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sorli S. C., Bunney T. D., Sugden P. H., Paterson H. F., Katan M. 2005. Signaling properties and expression in normal and tumor tissues of two phospholipase C epsilon splice variants. Oncogene. 24: 90–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sun L., Mao G., Kunapuli S. P., Dhanasekaran D. N., Rao A. K. 2007. Alternative splice variants of phospholipase C-beta2 are expressed in platelets: effect on Galphaq-dependent activation and localization. Platelets. 18: 217–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Min D. S., Kim D. M., Lee Y. H., Seo J., Suh P. G., Ryu S. H. 1993. Purification of a novel phospholipase C isozyme from bovine cerebellum. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 12207–12212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Adamski F. M., Timms K. M., Shieh B. H. 1999. A unique isoform of phospholipase Cbeta4 highly expressed in the cerebellum and eye. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1444: 55–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Upshaw J. L., Schoon R. A., Dick C. J., Billadeau D. D., Leibson P. J. 2005. The isoforms of phospholipase C-gamma are differentially used by distinct human NK activating receptors. J. Immunol. 175: 213–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ishikawa S., Takahashi T., Ogawa M., Nakamura Y. 1997. Genomic structure of the human PLCD1 (phospholipase C delta 1) locus on 3p22→p21.3. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 78: 58–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Fukami K., Inoue T., Kurokawa M., Fissore R. A., Nakao K., Nagano K., Nakamura Y., Takenaka K., Yoshida N., Mikoshiba K., et al. 2003. Phospholipase Cdelta4: from genome structure to physiological function. Adv. Enzyme Regul. 43: 87–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kouchi Z., Fukami K., Shikano T., Oda S., Nakamura Y., Takenawa T., Miyazaki S. 2004. Recombinant phospholipase Czeta has high Ca2+ sensitivity and induces Ca2+ oscillations in mouse eggs. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 10408–10412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hwang J. I., Oh Y. S., Shin K. J., Kim H., Ryu S. H., Suh P. G. 2005. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel phospholipase C, PLC-eta. Biochem. J. 389: 181–186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zhou Y., Wing M. R., Sondek J., Harden T. K. 2005. Molecular cloning and characterization of PLC-eta2. Biochem. J. 391: 667–676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ramazzotti G., Faenza I., Follo M. Y., Fiume R., Piazzi M., Giardino R., Fini M., Cocco L. 2011. Nuclear phospholipase C in biological control and cancer. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 21: 291–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Follo M. Y., Faenza I., Fiume R., Ramazzotti G., McCubrey J. A., Martelli A. M., Manzoli F. A., Cocco L. 2012. Revisiting nuclear phospholipase C signalling in MDS. Adv. Biol. Regul. 52: 2–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Follo M. Y., Marmiroli S., Faenza I., Fiume R., Ramazzotti G., Martelli A. M., Gobbi P., McCubrey J. A., Finelli C., Manzoli F. A., et al. 2013. Nuclear phospholipase C beta1 signaling, epigenetics and treatments in MDS. Adv. Biol. Regul. 53: 2–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Follo M. Y., Faenza I., Piazzi M., Blalock W. L., Manzoli L., McCubrey J. A., Cocco L. 2014. Nuclear PI-PLCbeta1: an appraisal on targets and pathology. Adv. Biol. Regul. 54: 2–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Koh H. Y. 2013. Phospholipase C-beta1 and schizophrenia-related behaviors. Adv. Biol. Regul. 53: 242–248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Fukaya M., Uchigashima M., Nomura S., Hasegawa Y., Kikuchi H., Watanabe M. 2008. Predominant expression of phospholipase Cbeta1 in telencephalic principal neurons and cerebellar interneurons, and its close association with related signaling molecules in somatodendritic neuronal elements. Eur. J. Neurosci. 28: 1744–1759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Watanabe M., Nakamura M., Sato K., Kano M., Simon M. I., Inoue Y. 1998. Patterns of expression for the mRNA corresponding to the four isoforms of phospholipase Cbeta in mouse brain. Eur. J. Neurosci. 10: 2016–2025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Lin X. H., Kitamura N., Hashimoto T., Shirakawa O., Maeda K. 1999. Opposite changes in phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C immunoreactivity in the left prefrontal and superior temporal cortex of patients with chronic schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry. 46: 1665–1671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Shirakawa O., Kitamura N., Lin X. H., Hashimoto T., Maeda K. 2001. Abnormal neurochemical asymmetry in the temporal lobe of schizophrenia. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 25: 867–877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Lo Vasco V. R., Longo L., Polonia P. 2013. Phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C beta1 gene deletion in bipolar disorder affected patient. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 7: 25–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kawakami T., Xiao W. 2013. Phospholipase C-beta in immune cells. Adv. Biol. Regul. 53: 249–257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Li Z., Jiang H., Xie W., Zhang Z., Smrcka A. V., Wu D. 2000. Roles of PLC-beta2 and -beta3 and PI3Kgamma in chemoattractant-mediated signal transduction. Science. 287: 1046–1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Wang Z., Liu B., Wang P., Dong X., Fernandez-Hernando C., Li Z., Hla T., Claffey K., Smith J. D., Wu D. 2008. Phospholipase C beta3 deficiency leads to macrophage hypersensitivity to apoptotic induction and reduction of atherosclerosis in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 118: 195–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Xiao W., Hong H., Kawakami Y., Kato Y., Wu D., Yasudo H., Kimura A., Kubagawa H., Bertoli L. F., Davis R. S., et al. 2009. Tumor suppression by phospholipase C-beta3 via SHP-1-mediated dephosphorylation of Stat5. Cancer Cell. 16: 161–171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Follo M. Y., Mongiorgi S., Finelli C., Piazzi M., Faenza I., Ramazzotti G., Santi P., McCubrey J. A., Martelli A. M., Cocco L. 2012. Nuclear PI-PLCbeta1 and myelodysplastic syndromes: genetics and epigenetics. Curr. Pharm. Des. 18: 1751–1754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Cocco L., Faenza I., Follo M. Y., Ramazzotti G., Gaboardi G. C., Billi A. M., Martelli A. M., Manzoli L. 2008. Inositide signaling: Nuclear targets and involvement in myelodysplastic syndromes. Adv. Enzyme Regul. 48: 2–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Mongiorgi S., Follo M. Y., Clissa C., Giardino R., Fini M., Manzoli L., Ramazzotti G., Fiume R., Finelli C., Cocco L. 2012. Nuclear PI-PLC beta1 and myelodysplastic syndromes: from bench to clinics. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 362: 235–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ramazzotti G., Faenza I., Fiume R., Matteucci A., Piazzi M., Follo M. Y., Cocco L. 2011. The physiology and pathology of inositide signaling in the nucleus. J. Cell. Physiol. 226: 14–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Follo M. Y., Finelli C., Clissa C., Mongiorgi S., Bosi C., Martinelli G., Baccarani M., Manzoli L., Martelli A. M., Cocco L. 2009. Phosphoinositide-phospholipase C beta1 mono-allelic deletion is associated with myelodysplastic syndromes evolution into acute myeloid leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 27: 782–790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Follo M. Y., Mongiorgi S., Finelli C., Clissa C., Ramazzotti G., Fiume R., Faenza I., Manzoli L., Martelli A. M., Cocco L. 2010. Nuclear inositide signaling in myelodysplastic syndromes. J. Cell. Biochem. 109: 1065–1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Manzoli L., Mongiorgi S., Clissa C., Finelli C., Billi A. M., Poli A., Quaranta M., Cocco L., Follo M. Y. 2014. Strategic role of nuclear inositide signalling in myelodysplastic syndromes therapy. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 14: 873–883. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Follo M. Y., Finelli C., Mongiorgi S., Clissa C., Bosi C., Testoni N., Chiarini F., Ramazzotti G., Baccarani M., Martelli A. M., et al. 2009. Reduction of phosphoinositide-phospholipase C beta1 methylation predicts the responsiveness to azacitidine in high-risk MDS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106: 16811–16816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Follo M. Y., Finelli C., Mongiorgi S., Clissa C., Chiarini F., Ramazzotti G., Paolini S., Martinelli G., Martelli A. M., Cocco L. 2011. Synergistic induction of PI-PLCbeta1 signaling by azacitidine and valproic acid in high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 25: 271–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Follo M. Y., Russo D., Finelli C., Mongiorgi S., Clissa C., Fili C., Colombi C., Gobbi M., Manzoli L., Piazzi M., et al. 2012. Epigenetic regulation of nuclear PI-PLCbeta1 signaling pathway in low-risk MDS patients during azacitidine treatment. Leukemia. 26: 943–950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Philip F., Sahu S., Caso G., Scarlata S. 2013. Role of phospholipase C-beta in RNA interference. Adv. Biol. Regul. 53: 319–330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Lattanzio R., Piantelli M., Falasca M. 2013. Role of phospholipase C in cell invasion and metastasis. Adv. Biol. Regul. 53: 309–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Chan J. J., Katan M. 2013. PLCvarepsilon and the RASSF family in tumour suppression and other functions. Adv. Biol. Regul. 53: 258–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Chan J. J., Flatters D., Rodrigues-Lima F., Yan J., Thalassinos K., Katan M. 2013. Comparative analysis of interactions of RASSF1–10. Adv. Biol. Regul. 53: 190–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Wang X., Zhou C., Qiu G., Yang Y., Yan D., Xing T., Fan J., Tang H., Peng Z. 2012. Phospholipase C epsilon plays a suppressive role in incidence of colorectal cancer. Med. Oncol. 29: 1051–1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Nomikos M., Kashir J., Swann K., Lai F. A. 2013. Sperm PLCzeta: from structure to Ca2+ oscillations, egg activation and therapeutic potential. FEBS Lett. 587: 3609–3616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Amdani S. N., Jones C., Coward K. 2013. Phospholipase C zeta (PLCzeta): oocyte activation and clinical links to male factor infertility. Adv. Biol. Regul. 53: 292–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Nakamura Y., Kanemarum K., Fukami K. 2013. Physiological functions of phospholipase Cdelta1 and phospholipase Cdelta3. Adv. Biol. Regul. 53: 356–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



