Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 25.

Published in final edited form as: Aphasiology. 2015 Apr 27;29(10):1164–1188. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1035225

Table 5.

Phonological facilitation effects in verb naming for each participant group (with standard errors)

	Naming Accuracies (%)			Naming Latencies (ms)			Viewing Times (ms)
Participants	Related	Unrelated	p-value	Related	Unrelated	p-value	Related	Unrelated	p-value
Young	96 (1.1)	96 (0.8)	n.s.	796 (30)	877 (34)	^**	439 (27)	471(32)	^**
Age-matched	90 (1.5)	93 (1.0)	n.s.	846 (28)	896(29)	^***	391 (21)	435 (23)	^**
Agrammatic	75 (3.3)	74 (3.1)	n.s	1,921 (185)	2,225 (193)	^**	966 (81)	1,099 (94)	^**
Anomic	77 (2.7)	74 (3.0)	n.s.	1,618 (144)	1,583 (134)	n.s.	843 (72)	906 (83)	n.s.

^**

p < .01,

^***

p < .001