Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2015 Sep 25;10(9):e0135164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135164

Modulation of Locomotion and Reproduction by FLP Neuropeptides in the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

Yan-Jung Chang 1, Tina Burton 1, Lawrence Ha 1, Zi Huang 1, Adewale Olajubelo 1, Chris Li 1,2,*
Editor: Christian Wegener3
PMCID: PMC4583311  PMID: 26406995

Abstract

Neuropeptides function in animals to modulate most, if not all, complex behaviors. In invertebrates, neuropeptides can function as the primary neurotransmitter of a neuron, but more generally they co-localize with a small molecule neurotransmitter, as is commonly seen in vertebrates. Because a single neuron can express multiple neuropeptides and because neuropeptides can bind to multiple G protein-coupled receptors, neuropeptide actions increase the complexity by which the neural connectome can be activated or inhibited. Humans are estimated to have 90 plus neuropeptide genes; by contrast, nematodes, a relatively simple organism, have a slightly larger complement of neuropeptide genes. For instance, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has over 100 neuropeptide-encoding genes, of which at least 31 genes encode peptides of the FMRFamide family. To understand the function of this large FMRFamide peptide family, we isolated knockouts of different FMRFamide-encoding genes and generated transgenic animals in which the peptides are overexpressed. We assayed these animals on two basic behaviors: locomotion and reproduction. Modulating levels of different neuropeptides have strong as well as subtle effects on these behaviors. These data suggest that neuropeptides play critical roles in C. elegans to fine tune neural circuits controlling locomotion and reproduction.

Introduction

Neuropeptides are commonly used to modulate behaviors in both vertebrates and invertebrates. They can act synaptically within a neural circuit, as well as extra-synaptically to affect more distant neural circuits. These modes of action, in conjunction with the sheer number of neuropeptides, increase the diversity of behavioral outputs in an organism. Furthermore, a single neuropeptide gene may encode many peptides with similar or different amino acid sequences; these peptides may bind the same or multiple receptors with different affinities to exert different physiological activities. Hence, understanding the full range of neuropeptide activities has been challenging in any organism.

Data mining of the DNA sequence of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has revealed over 100 genes that encode neuropeptides [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The neuropeptides have been classified into three major groups: the insulin-related peptides (INS), the FMRFamide-related peptides (FLPs), and all other neuropeptides (NLPs). Signaling through these peptides affects numerous behaviors, including response to environmental conditions, metabolism, locomotion, and egg laying [3,4,5, 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. We have been examining the role of FMRFamide-related peptides or FLPs in C. elegans. At least 31 flp genes encode FLPs and the expression patterns of many of these genes have been characterized [9,14,15,22]. Because the synaptic connectivity of all 302 neurons has been determined in C. elegans [23], the behavioral circuits underlying many behaviors, such as locomotion and reproduction, are well described.

Locomotion and reproduction represent two critical behaviors for C. elegans survival and propagation. C. elegans moves in a sinusoidal waveform when on a solid surface or in a liquid medium. This movement is mediated by sets of motor neurons residing in the ventral nerve cord and innervating dorsal and ventral body wall muscles [23]. Muscle contractions are mediated by the cholinergic A-, B-, and C-type neurons, including the VA, VB, VC, and AS neurons that innervate ventral muscles and the DA and DB neurons that innervate dorsal muscles [23,24,25,26]. Muscle relaxation is mediated by the GABAergic D-type neurons, DD and VD, which innervate dorsal and ventral muscles, respectively [23,27]. Both the DD and VD neurons express flp-11, while only the DD neurons express flp-13 [22]. No flp expression has been identified in the A- and B-type neurons thus far. The locomotory motoneurons receive input from several command interneurons and together the neurons coordinate the ventral and dorsal muscles to generate the waveform for efficient forward and backward movement. These interneurons receive direct and indirect input from sensory neurons that transduce environmental stimuli. flp-1 and 18 are expressed in a subset of the locomotory command interneurons [22].

The neural circuit for egg laying is also well characterized. The egg-laying muscles are innervated by the serotonergic and cholinergic HSN [26,28] and VC neurons [26], which receive input from several interneurons, including AVF and BDU, and the mechanosensory neuron PLM [23]. Similar to the locomotory circuit, the motor, sensory, and interneurons involved in egg laying express several flp genes, including flp-19 in the HSN neurons, flp-4 in the AVF interneurons, flp-10 in the BDU interneurons, and flp-20 in the PLM mechanosensory neuron [22,23]. Although the VC neurons are FMRFamide-like immunoreactive [29], the specific flp gene responsible for this immunoreactivity has not been identified. In addition, the neural circuit that regulates the number of eggs present in the uterus at any given time is unknown.

Because the locomotory and egg-laying circuits are well defined, we decided to explore how FLP neuropeptides modulate these two behaviors. We isolated deletion mutants in 11 flp genes, many of which are expressed in the locomotory or egg-laying circuits and some of which are not explicitly expressed in any neurons of the motor circuits, and examined how the locomotory and egg-laying behaviors were affected in these mutants. Most mutants displayed locomotory and/or egg-laying defects, suggesting that many FLP neuropeptides play a role in modulating these behaviors.

Materials and Methods

Maintenance of strains

Strains were maintained at 20°C as described [30]. The wild-type strain is N2 var. Bristol [30]. Strains used include: LGII: flp-4(yn35) [31]; LGIV: flp-10(pk367), flp-9(yn36); LGIV: daf-10 flp-1(yn2) [11]; LGV: flp-21(pk1601, ok889), flp-6(pk1593); LGX: flp-18(tm2197), flp-12(n4902), flp-20(pk1596), flp-3(pk361), flp-19(pk1594), flp-8(pk360). Transgenic lines include: flp-3: ynEx179, ynEx180 [flp-3; myo-2p::GFP]; flp-4: ynEx178, ynEx231, ynIs99 [flp-4; myo-2p::GFP]; flp-10: ynEx169, ynEx170, ynIs92, ynIs93, ynIs94, ynIs95, ynIs98 [flp-10; myo-2p::GFP; sur-5::GFP]; flp-19: ynEx171, ynEx232 [flp-19; myo-2p::GFP]; flp-20: ynEx167, ynEx168 [flp-20; myo-2p::GFP; sur-5::GFP]; flp-21: ynEx172, ynEx181, ynEx233 [flp-21; myo-2p::GFP]. Integrated lines were not mapped and only ynIs94, ynIs95, ynIs98 [flp-10; myo-2p::GFP] were outcrossed before behavioral analysis.

Isolation of deletion mutants

Libraries of mutagenized animals [32] were screened by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primers flanking the coding region of the different flp genes. Populations showing a deletion in the flp gene were sib selected until the flp deletion mutant was isolated. The flp-18(tm2197) mutant was generously donated by the Japanese National BioResource Project. Deletion mutants were backcrossed at least three times into a wild-type background to remove unlinked mutations.

PCR and generation of transgenic animals

PCR was used to confirm the genotype of different strains. The program used was: 94°C for 1 minute, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 40 sec, 58°C for 40 sec, and 72°C for 40 sec to 1 min. To generate transgenic lines, the genomic region for representative flp genes was amplified, the product gel purified, and the purified product co-injected with the transgenic markers sur-5::GFP [33] and/or myo-2p::GFP [34]. The primer pairs used for amplification of genomic regions, sizes of promoter regions, co-injection markers, and concentrations of injected DNA are listed in Table 1. All of the 5’ primers used to amplify genomic regions were the same as the primers used in the promoter constructs to determine flp gene expression patterns [22], except for flp-10, where an additional 67 bp was used in the promoter region for the genomic fragment. Extrachromosomal arrays in transgenic lines were integrated into the genome as described [35] with slight modifications.

Table 1. Amplification of genomic fragments and co-injection markers for microinjection.

Gene 5’ primer sequence (5’ to 3’) 3’ primer sequence (5’ to 3’) Length of region upstream of translational ATG (bp) Length of region down-stream of stop (bp) Concen-tration of micro-injected DNA (ng/μl) Co-injection marker^ Concen-tration of co-injection marker (ng/μl)
flp-3 ACCCATTCGTTTTGGCAAACG TGACTTGGTGTTGCACAGCTG 1995 1616 1 myo-2p::GFP 66
flp-4 TGTAGTACGTGACTGTAGCCC CAAGGGTCATTCTCATTGTTAGCC 2943 1135 4.5 myo-2p::GFP 66
flp-10 CTAGTGTTGCTTCGCGATTC CGCTTCGAGATCAAATCTTCG 1671 261 20 myo-2p::GFP & sur-5::GFP 80 & 500 ng/μl
flp-19 GACTCACCGTAGTAATCC GTAGTTTGTCTTCCATCTACC 2920 509 35–70 myo-2p::GFP 88
flp-20 GGAAACATTGGTCGGGAGATG CGCACATCGTTCGATTAG 3069 156 17 myo-2p::GFP & sur-5::GFP 80 & 500
flp-21 GCCCATCATGTACAGCCC CCCGAATGCTGAATTGACCAAAC 2975 875 57 myo-2p::GFP 88

myo-2p::GFP [34] & sur-5::GFP [33]

Behavioral assays

For all behavioral assays, healthy (i.e., non-starved, non-dauered) fourth larval stage animals were plated and used the following day as day 1 adults, except for egg retention assays, when animals were used two days later as day 2 adults. At least 40 animals of each mutant strain and at least 30 animals for each transgenic strain were assayed over multiple trials. All assays were performed at room temperature. Because of the inherent variability among animals and in scoring, multiple, independent researchers scored mutants and the composite averages were tallied.

Swimming assay

Animals were placed into 50 μl of M9 physiological buffer and the number of body bends made in 15 seconds was counted (as modified from [36]). Each individual animal was tested three times and the three values were averaged to give a single mean value for the animal.

Serotonin-induced inhibition

The presence of serotonin inhibits locomotion [37]. Animals were placed into 12.9 mM serotonin in M9 physiological buffer and the number of body bends made in 15 seconds was counted. Each individual animal was tested three times and the three values were averaged to give a mean value for the animal.

Egg-laying rate

Animals placed into physiological buffer are transiently inhibited from egg laying. This inhibition is overridden by the presence of serotonin. Animals were placed into 50 μl of 12.9 mM serotonin in M9 physiological buffer [28] and the number of eggs laid after 60 minutes was counted.

Egg retention

Animals were placed into 50 μl of a weak hypochlorite solution (1.2 ml of Chlorox bleach, 0.5 ml of KOH, water to 10 ml) to dissolve the adult mother. The number of eggs, which are resistant to the hypochlorite solution, was counted.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using Prism software (GraphPad). Wild-type animals and mutants were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Mutants and transgenic mutants containing a genomic transgene were compared as a group with a one-way ANOVA and Neuman Keuls posthoc test.

Results

At least 31 genes encode 72 potential FLP peptides [6,8,9,38]; by cDNA screening all of these genes are expressed [6,8]Wormbase) and 56 of the predicted peptides have been biochemically isolated [39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. These genes are expressed in neurons involved in multiple behaviors, including locomotion, reproduction, aggregation, and pharyngeal pumping [22]. However, how these FLP peptides modulate these neural circuits are still unclear. To examine the function of the different FLP peptides, we initiated a project to isolate mutants for each of the flp genes. We screened several mutagenized libraries for flp deletion mutants [32]. Because many of the flp genes encode multiple peptides (Fig 1), we reasoned that a deletion of the flp coding region was more likely to result in a null mutation. Eleven flp mutants were the first to be isolated: flp-3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 18, 19, 20, and 21. The complete coding region for flp-3, 6, 8, 19, 20, and 21(ok889) were deleted in the isolated mutants; the peptide coding region was deleted in the flp-4, 9, and 12 mutants and the promoter region with peptide or non-peptide coding regions were deleted in the flp-1, 10, 18, and 21(pk1601) mutants (Fig 1). We also included daf-10 flp-1(yn2) in our assays; the yn2 deletion knocks out two genes, flp-1 and the neighboring daf-10, and will be referred to as flp-1 hereafter [11]. The 12 flp mutants were examined for locomotory and egg-laying behavior.

Fig 1. Genomic organization of the flp genes.

Fig 1

The extent of the deletions are indicated below by the red bars. The peptide coding regions (not to scale) are indicated by blue bars; one peptide coding region may extend over two exons. Flanking sequences and sizes of the deletions are as follows: daf-10 flp-1(yn2) (CTAAATAATTTTAAAACGTA/CTTACCTTTCAAAGTTTGCA) [11], flp-3 (GCACAGCTGGAGGGTGGAGG/CAAACGATTACTATTGTGTC; 2632 bp deletion), flp-4 (TTCTGAAAAACTTTTAATAA/AGCTCGCCGAGCCGAGTCTTG; 928 bp deletion) [31], flp-6 (CAAAAAAGCGAGTCGGGGGT/TCGTTTTTCACTTATTGAAC; 1662 bp deletion), flp-8 (AGATAAATCTCAGAACAAGC/ATAATTTTGGCGTCATAGTT; 1414 bp deletion), flp-9 (ATAATAATTATCTAGAAATA/GTACTTTCGATTCGATTCCT; 1881 bp deletion), flp-10 (GCTTATTCTGCGTTCATCA/GTAAAAACTATCTTAATAAT; 1884 bp deletion), flp-12 (CACTAGACATAGCTCTCCATG/TCAATTTGAATTTCTGAATA; 1732 bp deletion), flp-18(tm2179) (CGGAGCACTCCCGGCATTTC/GAGCGCCCCACGAAGCAAACAACAC; 1286 bp deletion) (Wormbase), flp-19 (CACATTTCACCGGTTTGTCG/TACTTGAACCGAAATTTACT; 1946 bp deletion), flp-20 (TTACTTTTAATACGTCTAAT/CCATTCATTTTAAAAGAATT; 1343 bp deletion), flp-21(pk1601) (GAAAAAAGAAGAACCTACAT/TCAGAAAAAAGTAAACTAAT ; 464 bp deletion) [14], and flp-21(ok889) (GAGCAGTAGATTTTTCAAGT/TTCCTACCAAAGCCGAGCCGA; 1786 bp deletion) (Wormbase).

Because a single flp gene can be expressed in multiple types of neurons (e.g., sensory and motoneurons or sensory and interneurons), it is difficult to categorize the flp genes into distinct groups. Among the flp genes being analyzed, a few, flp-4, 6, and 8, are expressed predominantly in sensory neurons, but multiple types of sensory neurons. The more common example is that flp genes are expressed in many types of sensory neurons as well as other types of neurons. For instance, many of the examined flp genes expressed in chemosensory neurons (flp-4, 6, 10, 20, and 21) [50] are also expressed in other types of sensory neurons, such as gentle mechanosensory (flp-4, 8, 12, and 20) [51], harsh mechanosensory (flp-4) [52], thermosensory (flp-6) [53], and/or oxygen/carbon dioxide sensory (flp-3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 19, and 20) [54,55,56] neurons [22] as well as interneurons (flp-6, 8, 10, and 20) or motoneurons (flp-21). Only two of the examined flp genes are expressed predominantly in interneurons (flp-1 and 18) or in sensory, motor, and interneurons (flp-12 and 19). The expression pattern of one gene among the isolated mutants, flp-9, has not been determined.

The role of FLPs in locomotion

Swimming initiates in C. elegans when animals are immersed in liquid. The body flexures result from the alternating waves of excitation/inhibition of the body wall muscles mediated by the excitatory cholinergic A and B motoneurons [23,26] and the inhibitory GABAergic D motoneurons [23,27]. Multiple sensory neurons synapse directly or indirectly onto the command interneurons PVC and AVB, which synapse onto the ventral cord motoneurons VB and DB for forward movement, and onto the command interneurons AVA, AVD, and AVE, which synapse onto the ventral cord motoneurons VA and DA for backward movement [23,51]. The A and B neurons synapse onto the ventral cord inhibitory motoneurons VD and DD to ensure proper body flexures [23]. Hence, locomotion is the integrated output of multiple sensory inputs. Because the flp genes are expressed in a variety of neurons, we expected that altering many flp genes would affect swimming rates. None of the flp genes examined are expressed in the ventral cord motoneurons. Two flp genes, flp-1 and 18, are expressed in the locomotory command interneurons.

Swimming behavior can be quantified by counting the number of body bends in 15 seconds (Fig 2A; Table 2). Wild-type animals have a swimming rate of 24.66±0.10 body bends/15 sec (n = 678). Loss of flp-1 or 18, whose expression patterns include the command interneurons, caused a decreased swimming rate in flp-1 (20.64±0.30 body bends/15 sec, n = 128), but an increased swimming rate in flp-18 (25.80±0.43 body bends/15 sec, n = 40) mutants, indicating that loss of these peptides causes a downstream effect in the locomotory circuit. Among the flp genes whose expression patterns are predominantly in sensory neurons, only flp-4 mutants showed defects in swimming rate (24.00±0.24 body bends/15 sec, n = 153). Several mutants whose expression patterns include multiple types of neurons displayed hyperactive swimming, such as flp-3 (25.27±0.21 body bends/15 sec, n = 139), 10 (25.43±0.27 body bends/15 sec, n = 187), and 21(ok889) (25.74±0.17 body bends/15 sec, n = 129) mutants. flp-9 mutants (23.55±0.24 body bends/15 sec, n = 123) showed a significantly decreased swimming rate. Hence, knockout of multiple flp genes expressed in a variety of neurons, but not in the locomotory motoneurons, affect swimming behavior.

Fig 2. Loss of flp genes results in defects in locomotion.

Fig 2

(A) Disruption of multiple flp genes affects swimming rate. One day hermaphrodite adults were scored for the number of body bends per 15 seconds in physiological M9 buffer. (B) Many flp mutants show resistance to serotonin-induced inhibition on swimming locomotion. One day hermaphrodite adults were scored for the number of body bends per 15 seconds in physiological M9 buffer with 12.9 mM serotonin. Mean and SEM shown. N = number of animals examined; each animal was tested three times and the values averaged for that animal. At least three trials were performed for each strain. Mutants are color-coded and were grouped according to predominant expression pattern; loco. IN, flp expression in locomotory interneurons; SN, flp expression predominantly in sensory neurons; MN, flp expression predominantly in motoneurons; IN, flp expression predominantly in interneurons; solid bars indicate mutants, patterned bars indicate mutants containing corresponding genomic fragment; transgenic animals also indicated by [], Ex indicates non-integrated array, Is indicates integrated array; myo-2p::GFP and/or sur-5::GFP were used as the transgenic marker (see Table 1). *, p<0.05, **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001 significantly different from wild type, Mann-Whitney test; ^, p<0.05, ^^, p<0.01, ^^^, p<0.001 significantly different from mutant, one-way ANOVA, Neuman Keuls posthoc test.

Table 2. Multiple flp genes affect swimming and egg-laying behavior.

Genotype Swimming Rate/15 sec. Swimming Rate/15 sec. with 5-HT Egg-laying Rate/hr Egg Retention
Wild type (N2) 24.66±0.10 (n = 678) 2.07±0.23 (n = 669) 5.77±0.18 (n = 658) 13.28±0.29 (n = 701)
Expressed mainly in sensory neurons
flp-4(yn35) 24.00±0.24 (n = 153)* 2.71±0.57 (n = 169) 5.49±0.46 (n = 116) 15.64±0.62 (n = 159)
flp-4; ynEx231 [flp-4]#1 28.81±0.43 (n = 98)^^^ 2.33±1.02 (n = 61) 2.30±0.40 (n = 61)^^^ 12.27±0.77 (n = 67)
flp-4; ynEx178 [flp-4]#2 28.37±0.39 (n = 93)^^^ 5.14±1.34 (n = 60) 3.42±0.51 (n = 60)^^ 10.17±1.00 (n = 64)^^^
flp-4; ynIs99 [flp-4]#3 25.18±0.52 (n = 90)^ 3.07±0.81 (n = 60)^ 4.83±0.47 (n = 60) 15.90±1.01 (n = 30)
flp-6(pk1593) 24.28±0.18 (n = 107) 2.65±0.54 (n = 186) 4.04±0.36 (n = 106)*** 7.17±0.29 (n = 174)***
flp-8(pk360) 24.99±0.24 (n = 134) 4.92±0.83 (n = 128)* 7.43±0.60 (n = 83)* 13.19±0.60 (n = 170)
Expressed mainly in interneurons
daf-10 flp-1(yn2) 20.64±0.30 (n = 128)*** 13.68±1.01 (n = 93)*** 2.82±0.44 (n = 67)*** 19.59±0.92 (n = 108)***
flp-18(tm2197) 25.80±0.43 (n = 40)** 5.25±1.05 (n = 76)* 6.26±0.52 (n = 76) 12.37±1.02 (n = 41)
Expressed in sensory and polymodal neurons
flp-3(pk361) 25.27±0.21 (n = 139)*** 4.33±0.75 (n = 140) 5.80±0.46 (n = 120) 12.36±0.44 (n = 227)
flp-3;ynEx179 [flp-3]#1 24.96±0.23 (n = 114) 1.57±0.63 (n = 86)^ 2.86±0.37 (n = 86)^^^ 7.05±0.48 (n = 86)^^^
flp-3; ynEx180 [flp-3]#2 25.02±0.37 (n = 90) 2.97±1.00 (n = 60) 7.08±0.60 (n = 60) 9.67±0.73 (n = 60)^
Expressed mainly in sensory and interneurons
flp-10(pk367) 25.43±0.27 (n = 187)*** 4.21±0.66 (n = 158)* 2.16±0.20 (n = 215)*** 8.29±0.31 (n = 214)***
flp-10; ynEx169 [flp-10]#1 23.29±0.44 (n = 88)^^^ 1.28±0.48 (n = 102) 6.37±0.75 (n = 84)^^^ 26.45±1.11 (n = 107)^^^
flp-10; ynEx170 [flp-10]#2 23.50±0.39 (n = 129)^^^ 2.20±0.51 (n = 116) 4.41±0.54 (n = 82) 26.16±1.27 (n = 97)^^^
flp-10; ynIs92 [flp-10]#3 23.60±0.32 (n = 127)^^^ 4.93±0.98 (n = 90) 9.05±0.92 (n = 60)^^^ 29.79±1.17 (n = 106)^^^
flp-10; ynIs93 [flp-10]#4 19.72±1.09 (n = 65)^^^ 9.46±1.52 (n = 63)^^^ 1.54±0.42 (n = 33) 20.25±1.62 (n = 51)^^^
flp-10; ynIs94 [flp-10]#5 23.11±0.22 (n = 92)^^^ 1.15±0.68 (n = 57) 5.96±0.77 (n = 57)^^^ 36.53±1.42 (n = 30)^^^
flp-10; ynIs95 [flp-10]#6 24.28±0.46 (n = 42) 0.59±0.42 (n = 59)^ 2.83±0.46 (n = 59) 33.10±2.82 (n = 30)^^^
flp-10; ynIs98 [flp-10]#7 21.75±0.37 (n = 41)^^^ 1.32±.98 (n = 32) 6.19±0.89 (n = 32)^^ 18.33±1.06 (n = 112)^^^
flp-20(pk1596) 23.89±0.34 (n = 109) 5.19±0.72 (n = 164)** 0.17±0.05 (n = 162)*** 32.69±1.05 (n = 240)***
flp-20;ynEx167 [flp-20]#1 24.88±0.35 (n = 94) 5.13±0.87 (n = 104) 0.91±0.36 (n = 74)^^ 27.82±1.59 (n = 61)^
flp-20; ynEx168 [flp-20]#2 24.93±0.36 (n = 96) 4.07±0.84 (n = 104) 0.69±0.16 (n = 74)^ 26.16±0.99 (n = 143)^^^
Expressed mainly in sensory and motorneurons
flp-21(pk1601) 24.70±0.26 (n = 99) 3.63±0.69 (n = 139) 3.40±0.37 (n = 112)*** 18.78±0.76 (n = 156)***
flp-21(pk1601); ynEx172 [flp-21] 25.02±0.22 (n = 137) 3.26±0.68 (n = 137) 3.23±0.38 (n = 137) 11.02±0.72 (n = 85)^^^
flp-21(ok889) 25.74±0.17 (n = 129)*** 5.00±0.97 (n = 103) 4.92±0.49 (n = 75)*** 17.11±0.68 (n = 75)***
flp-21(ok889);ynEx172 [flp-21]#1 25.37±0.35 (n = 104)^^^ 1.41±0.66 (n = 88)^ 3.92±0.45 (n = 116) 10.00±0.55 (n = 90)^^^
flp-21(ok889); ynEx181 [flp-21]#2 22.86±0.37 (n = 71)^^^ 0.71±0.50 (n = 60)^ 4.63±0.65 (n = 60) 17.85±0.83 (n = 78)
flp-21(ok889); ynEx233 [flp-21]#3 23.04±0.36 (n = 75)^^^ 1.38±0.60 (n = 72)^ 4.15±0.44 (n = 72) 13.69±0.87 (n = 71)^^
Expressed in sensory, interneurons, and motorneurons
flp-12(n4902) 24.44±0.27 (n = 122) 1.95±0.63 (n = 103) 4.41±0.46 (n = 91)** 19.75±0.84 (n = 183)***
flp-19(pk1594) 24.39±0.24 (n = 117) 8.10±0.95 (n = 132)*** 3.89±0.46 (n = 93)*** 16.46±0.79 (n = 138)**
flp-19;ynEx171 [flp-19]#1 25.06±0.27 (n = 136) 0.75±0.37 (n = 114)^^^ 8.36±0.66 (n = 84)^^^ 22.89±0.69 (n = 140)^^^
flp-19; ynEx232 [flp-19]#2 ND 1.87±1.16 (n = 30)^^^ 2.37±0.58 (n = 30) 19.22±1.44 (n = 36)
Expression pattern unknown
flp-9(yn36) 23.55±0.24 (n = 123)*** 4.81±0.73 (n = 145)** 7.43±0.50 (n = 110)** 11.98±0.59 (n = 128)*

ND = not determined. [], indicates transgenic lines carrying the genomic region of the indicated gene; multiple independent lines were generated.

*, p<0.05,

**, p<0.01,

***, p<0.001 significantly different from wild type, Mann-Whitney test;

^, p<0.05,

^^, p<0.01,

^^^, p<0.001 significantly different from mutant, one-way ANOVA, Neuman Keuls posthoc test.

To determine whether these swimming defects were due to loss of the corresponding flp gene, we microinjected the genomic region corresponding to representative genes (flp-3, 4, 10, 19, 20, and 21) into the respective mutants and assayed at least two independent transgenic mutant lines for swimming. flp-4 mutants showed a slightly decreased swimming rate, but in a transgenic mutant flp-4 line, a significant increase in the swimming rate was detected (28.81±0.43 body bends/15 sec, n = 98), suggesting that FLP-4 peptides potentiate swimming rate. flp-10 and flp-21(ok889) mutants showed an increased swimming rate and transgene expression of flp-10 and flp-21 caused a significant decrease in the swimming rate, suggesting that FLP-10 and FLP-21 peptides decrease swimming rates.

The presence of serotonin reduces locomotion in wild-type animals [37] through activity of the NSM and HSN neurons [37,57]. The swimming rate, for example, drops to 2.07 ± 0.23 body bends/15 sec (n = 669) in wild-type animals in the presence of serotonin (Fig 2B, Table 2). Several flp mutants were insensitive to varying degrees to this serotonin-induced inhibition. For instance, flp-8, 9, and 20 mutants showed slight, but significant resistance, whereas flp-1 and 19 mutants showed significant resistance to the serotonin-induced inhibition (Fig 2B, Table 2). This resistance to serotonin-induced inhibition in flp-19 mutants could be rescued by a flp-19 genomic fragment, suggesting that FLP-19 peptides do not affect swimming rate, but inhibit the action of serotonin on swimming. flp-20 mutants had only modest resistance to the serotonin-induced inhibition, and transgenic flp-20 mutants exhibited slight, but not significant serotonin-induced inhibition, suggesting that FLP-20 peptides have a modest effect on the serotonergic circuit.

Egg laying is highly sensitive to levels of different FLPs

The egg-laying motor circuit consists of the serotonergic/peptidergic (flp-19) HSN [22,58] and cholinergic/peptidergic VC motoneurons [26,29], both of which synapse onto the vulval muscles [23] whose contractions allow the release of eggs. Animals alternate between an active and inactive egg-laying state; this temporal switch is regulated by the HSN and VC neurons [59]. Egg-laying rate is sensitive to environmental conditions, such as food availability [28], hypertonic salt concentrations [37], and mechanical vibrations [60], and is coordinated with other behaviors, such as locomotion [28,57]. Hence, sensory input into the egg-laying circuit plays a significant role in determining egg-laying output. The mechanosensory neuron PLM and BDU interneuron [22] synapse directly onto the HSN neurons [23], and express the flp-20 and 10 genes, respectively. Because egg laying is affected by multiple sensory stimuli, we expected that loss of multiple flp genes would also indirectly affect egg laying.

Wild-type animals were stimulated by serotonin to lay 5.77±0.18 eggs (n = 658) per hour (Fig 3A; Table 2). We observed decreased egg-laying rates in most flp mutants. flp-19 is expressed in chemo- and aerosensory neurons as well the HSN motoneurons within the egg-laying circuit. flp-19 mutants showed a significant decrease in egg-laying rate (3.89±0.46 eggs; n = 93), which was rescued by transgene expression in one line (Fig 3A; Table 2). Whether this egg-laying decrease is due to loss of FLP-19 peptides from HSN or sensory input is unclear. For other flp genes that synapse directly onto the egg-laying circuit, both flp-10 (2.16±0.20 eggs; n = 215) and 20 (0.17±0.05 eggs; n = 162) had significantly decreased egg-laying rates compared to wild type. The flp-10 transgene rescued the egg-laying defect to varying degrees, suggesting that FLP-10 peptides potentiates egg-laying rate. Surprisingly, flp-20 displayed an extremely low egg-laying rate, but presence of its transgene had only a slight, but significant, increase in the egg-laying rate (Fig 3A; Table 2). For flp genes expressed in sensory neurons, there was a variety of responses. flp-6 (4.04±0.36 eggs; n = 106) and 21(pk1601) (3.40±0.37 eggs; n = 112) mutants showed a significant decrease, which could not be rescued by the flp-21 transgene, while flp-8 mutants (7.43±0.60 eggs; n = 83) showed a significant increase in the egg-laying rate (Fig 3; Table 2). Loss of flp-1, which is primarily expressed in interneurons, also showed a significant decrease in egg-laying rate (2.82±0.44 eggs; n = 67). Loss of flp-4 had no effect on egg laying, but its overexpression caused a decrease in egg laying, suggesting that release of FLP-4 peptides from sensory circuits causes an indirect inhibitory effect on egg laying.

Fig 3. Several flp genes affect reproductive behavior.

Fig 3

(A) One day hermaphrodite adults were allowed to lay eggs for 1 hour in the presence of serotonin. (B) Two day hermaphrodite adults were bleached to release eggs to determine the number of eggs in the uterus. Mean and SEM shown. N = number of animals examined; at least three trials were performed for each strain. Mutants are color-coded and were grouped according to predominant expression pattern; MN of egg-laying circuit, flp expression in motoneurons of egg-laying circuit; SN, flp expression predominantly in sensory neurons; IN, flp expression predominantly in interneurons; solid bars indicate mutants, patterned bars indicate mutants containing genomic fragment as indicated in brackets; myo-2p::GFP and/or sur-5::GFP were used as the transgenic markers (see Table 1). *, p<0.05, **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001 significantly different from wild type, Mann-Whitney test; ^, p<0.05, ^^, p<0.01, ^^^, p<0.001 significantly different from mutant, one-way ANOVA, Neuman Keuls posthoc test.

FLPs modulate the number of eggs retained in the uterus

The altered egg-laying rate in the flp mutants could be caused by a number of factors, including a decreased number of eggs generated, an incorrect sensing of the number of eggs in the uterus, or a failure of egg release due to muscle insensitivity to serotonin. We examined whether the altered egg-laying rates were due to a decreased pool of eggs available to be released or an increased retention of eggs in the uterus. We and others [61] have found that wild-type animals have 10–15 eggs in their uterus at any one time (two day adults: 13.28±0.29 eggs (n = 701); Fig 3B; Table 2).

Loss of flp-19 caused a decreased egg-laying rate and an increased egg retention rate (16.46±0.79 eggs; n = 138), indicating that the defective egg-laying rate in flp-19 mutants is not due to decreased egg production, but due to decreased egg release. However, transgene expression of flp-19 in mutants only exacerbated the egg retention defect (Fig 3B; Table 2), suggesting that FLP-19 peptides released from sensory or interneurons also affect reproduction. Loss of flp-20, which is expressed in neurons with direct synaptic input onto the egg-laying motor circuit, is similarly correlated. Among all the flp mutants examined, flp-20 showed the lowest egg-laying rate and the highest number of retained eggs (32.69±1.05 eggs; n = 240), which could be partially rescued by a flp-20 transgene. By contrast, flp-10, which is also expressed in a neuron with synaptic input into the egg-laying motor circuit, had a decreased egg-laying rate, and showed a decreased number of eggs retained in the uterus, suggesting that lack of egg production is responsible for the decreased egg laying rate; transgene expression of flp-10 in mutants caused an extremely high number of retained eggs in the uterus, indicating that FLP-10 peptides may influence activity of the sensor that determines the optimal number of eggs in the uterus or serotonergic input onto vulval muscles. Among the other flp mutants, the inverse correlation between egg-laying rate and number of eggs retained in the uterus was seen in flp-1, 4, 12, and 21 mutants, again suggesting that decreased egg production is not responsible for the decreased egg-laying rate; the increased egg retention was rescued with the transgene in flp-4 and 21 mutants. Like flp-10 mutants, flp-6 mutants showed a decreased egg-laying rate and a decreased number of eggs in the uterus (7.17±0.29 eggs; n = 174) (Table 2), suggesting that egg production may factor into the decreased egg-laying rate. These results reinforce our findings that multiple FLP peptides modulate the output of the egg-laying circuit.

Discussion

Environmental stimuli are integrated through multiple sensory modalities to determine behavior. Hence, we expected that disruption of any neural circuit would ultimately have an effect on most behavioral outputs, such as locomotion and reproduction. In this paper, we explored the effects of FLP neuropeptides released from different neural circuits [23,62]. Because neuropeptides are generally co-localized with a small molecule transmitter [10,22] and have modulatory effects, we predicted that modulating levels of many of the FLP peptides would affect locomotion and reproduction and found this prediction to be correct.

Although FLP peptides are expressed in the locomotory motoneurons, none of the flp genes examined are expressed in the locomotory motoneurons. Five of the 11 flp mutants showed defective swimming rates, which could be at least partially rescued by re-introduction of the respective flp gene (Fig 2). The expression patterns of the affected flp genes were not specific for certain types of neurons. Instead, the affected mutants included genes expressed in interneurons (flp-1 and 18) (36, 39) and sensory neurons (flp-4, 10, and 21). flp-8, 10, 12, and 19 are expressed in the oxygen sensor neurons BAG and/or URX; however, only loss of flp-10 affected swimming rates. Similarly, flp-4, 6, 10, and 20 are expressed in the chemosensory ASE neuron, but only flp-4 and 10 knockouts showed modulated swimming rates (Table 2). flp-4 is also expressed in one mechanosensory neuron, but other flp genes expressed in mechanosensory neurons (flp-8, 12, and 20) showed no change in swimming rate. Because flp-4, 10, and 21 are expressed in so many different types of sensory neurons, it is difficult to ascribe their effects on swimming to a particular circuit. However, regulation of neuropeptide levels must be under very tight homeostatic control, because loss of many flp genes affect swimming rates and, conversely, transgene overexpression of flp genes also affect swimming rate. For instance, flp-4 overexpression increased swimming rate, while flp-10 and 21 overexpression decreased swimming rate, supporting the indirect role of these peptides in modulating swimming behavior. Among the characterized FLP peptides, many bind multiple receptors and the receptors through which these peptides signal show widespread expression. For instance, FLP-18 and 21 peptides bind at nM affinities to NPR-1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, and 11 [13,14,16]; for the NPR receptors that have been characterized, NPR-1 and 4 show widespread expression [16,63], making it difficult to draw conclusions as to which downstream neurons and circuits are being activated by the FLPs to affect locomotion.

The transgenic lines often gave a wide variety of responses, which we attribute to variation due to the mosaic nature of transgene expression. Unlike other organisms where the transgene is inserted into the genome, C. elegans transgenes are present as extrachromosomal arrays, which can be lost at any cell division. Hence, even within one non-integrated C. elegans transgenic line responses are variable, so multiple lines were analyzed. In addition, varying lengths of the promoter and 3’UTR regions (Table 1) for the different genomic fragments were used; longer lengths of these regions may contribute to better stability of the transcript, which could have resulted in better and/or less variable responses.

Within the reproductive motor circuit, none of the examined flp genes are expressed in the VC motoneurons or AVF command interneuron [22], but flp-19 is expressed in the HSN motoneurons, the critical neuron regulating the active egg-laying state [59]. Not surprisingly, modulating levels of FLP-19 peptides affected egg-laying rates. Loss of flp-19 decreased egg-laying rates, which could be rescued by re-introduction of FLP-19 peptides, suggesting that FLP-19 peptides released from HSN potentiates egg laying. No FLP-19 receptor has been identified thus far. Similarly, flp-10 is expressed in the BDU interneuron that synapses onto HSN, and again, not surprisingly, decreasing and increasing levels of FLP-10 peptide decreased or increased the egg-laying rate, respectively. The single FLP-10 peptide signals through the EGL-6 receptor, which is expressed by HSN neurons [15], suggesting that FLP-10 promotes egg laying by activating HSN. These results are in contrast to those of Ringstad and Horvitz [15], who reported that overexpression of flp-10 inhibited egg laying, while knockout of egl-6 had no effect on egg laying, as scored by the stage of the egg laid as opposed to egg-laying rate; in addition, these authors did not report flp-10 expression in BDU neurons with their expression vector, which may account for our differing results. Ringstad and Horvitz [15] also reported that flp-17 activity within the oxygen sensor BAG neuron inhibited egg laying. In addition to flp-10 and flp-17, flp-12 and 19 are expressed in the BAG neuron. Like flp-10 and 19, loss of flp-12 also decreased the egg-laying rate. Because flp-10 and 19 are expressed in multiple neurons within the egg-laying neural circuits, it is unclear from which neurons the peptides are exerting their effects on egg laying. Among other flp genes expressed in sensory neurons, loss of flp-6, 20, and 21 decreased the egg-laying rate, while flp-8 knockouts, as well as knockout of flp-9, whose expression pattern is unknown, showed an increased egg-laying rate; transgenic copies of flp-20 and 21 in the mutants caused the converse phenotype, indicating that, as previously reported [61], multiple sensory stimuli affect egg-laying rate. RNAi knockdown of FLP-21 receptors NPR-3, 6, and 11 also decreased brood size [64], suggesting that FLP-21 signals through these receptors to modulate egg laying. The receptors through which FLP-6, 9, 12, 19, and 20 peptides signal have not been identified.

We hypothesized that if there was a problem with egg release, egg-laying rates would be inversely correlated to egg retention in the uterus. Specifically, we expected that animals that displayed high egg-laying rates would have low numbers of eggs in the uterus and, conversely, animals with low egg-laying rates would have high numbers of eggs retained in the uterus. This inverse correlation was seen among several mutants. flp-1, 12, 19, 20, and 21 mutants showed low egg-laying rates and high numbers of eggs in the uterus, suggesting that eggs were being generated, but were not being released, perhaps because the neurons were not signaling to the muscles properly or the muscles were not responsive to serotonin. Conversely, flp-9 mutants showed an increased egg-laying rate and a decreased number of eggs retained, suggesting that eggs were laid as soon as they were generated and flp-9 is involved in the timing of egg release. There were also mutants, such as flp-4, whose egg-laying rate was unaffected, yet it retained a significant number of animals in its uterus; this egg retention defect was rescued with a wild-type copy of flp-4 (Table 2) and may indicate a disruption of a sensor that regulates the optimal number of eggs in the uterus. Several mutants showed a positive correlation in egg-laying rate and egg retention. For instance, flp-3, 6, 10, and 19 mutants showed significant decreases in the egg-laying rate as well as a decreased number of eggs retained, suggesting that there is a disruption in egg formation. Hence, the FLP peptides affect reproductive behavior in a multitude of ways.

Conclusions

We examined the effects of loss of FLP neuropeptides on locomotory and reproductive behavior. Because environmental stimuli activate multiple sensory systems that are integrated to determine locomotory and reproductive behavior, we have found that any perturbation of sensory or motor systems, such as by altering the levels of neuropeptide signaling, will modulate these behaviors. Furthermore, we have not explored, because of technical difficulties, whether neuropeptides exert their effects extrasynaptically, such that neuropeptides released within the nerve ring may affect neural circuits for which they do not have a direct synaptic connection. Our work has shown the interconnections between all neural circuits in the control of critical behaviors in an organism. Nematodes have the largest known family of FLPs in the animal kingdom [65]. The role of each specific FLP peptide in locomotion and reproduction awaits further studies.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ronald Plasterk, Don Moerman, and Bob Horvitz for allowing us to screen their deletion libraries, Shohei Mitani and the Japanese National BioResource Project for the flp-18 mutant, and Andy Fire and Peter Okkema for plasmids. We thank Danny Xu for help amplifying some genomic fragments. We thank members of our laboratory, past and present, and members of the Plasterk, Moerman, and Horvitz laboratories for helpful discussions.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper. All raw data are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1538660.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (IOS 0820748) - CL, National Institutes of Health (R01 NS42459) - CL, and Research Centers in Minority Institutes grant (5G12MD007603) from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Duret L, Guex N, Peitsch MC, Bairoch A (1998) New insulin-like proteins with atypical disulfide bond pattern characterized in Caenorhabditis elegans by comparative sequence analysis and homology modeling. Genome Res 8: 348–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Gregoire FM, Chomiki N, Kachinskas D, Warden CH (1998) Cloning and developmental regulation of a novel member of the insulin-like gene family in Caenorhabditis elegans . Biochem Biophys Res Commun 249: 385–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kawano T, Ito Y, Ishiguro M, Takuwa K, Nakajima T, Kimura Y (2000) Molecular cloning and characterization of a new insulin/IGF-like peptide of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . Biochem Biophys Res Commun 273: 431–436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Pierce SB, Costa M, Wisotzkey R, Devadhar S, Homburger SA, Buchman AR, et al. (2001) Regulation of DAF-2 receptor signaling by human insulin and ins-1, a member of the unusually large and diverse C. elegans insulin gene family. Genes Dev 15: 672–686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Li W, Kennedy SG, Ruvkun G (2003) daf-28 encodes a C. elegans insulin superfamily member that is regulated by environmental cues and acts in the DAF-2 signaling pathway. Genes Dev 17: 844–858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Nelson LS, Kim K, Memmott JE, Li C (1998) FMRFamide-related gene family in the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans . Brain Res Mol Brain Res 58: 103–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Li C, Kim K, Nelson LS (1999) FMRFamide-related neuropeptide gene family in Caenorhabditis elegans . Brain Res 848: 26–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Li C, Nelson LS, Kim K, Nathoo A, Hart AC (1999) Neuropeptide gene families in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . Ann N Y Acad Sci 897: 239–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Li C, Kim K (2008) Neuropeptides. WormBook: 1–36. 10.1016/j.npep.2008.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Nathoo AN, Moeller RA, Westlund BA, Hart AC (2001) Identification of neuropeptide-like protein gene families in Caenorhabditiselegans and other species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 14000–14005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Nelson LS, Rosoff ML, Li C (1998) Disruption of a neuropeptide gene, flp-1, causes multiple behavioral defects in Caenorhabditis elegans . Science 281: 1686–1690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Waggoner LE, Hardaker LA, Golik S, Schafer WR (2000) Effect of a neuropeptide gene on behavioral states in Caenorhabditis elegans egg-laying. Genetics 154: 1181–1192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kubiak TM, Larsen MJ, Nulf SC, Zantello MR, Burton KJ, Modric T, et al. (2003) Differential activation of "social" and "solitary" variants of the Caenorhabditis elegans G protein-coupled receptor NPR-1 by its cognate ligand AF9. J Biol Chem 278: 33724–33729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Rogers C, Reale V, Kim K, Chatwin H, Li C, Evans P, et al. (2003) Inhibition of Caenorhabditis elegans social feeding by FMRFamide-related peptide activation of NPR-1. Nat Neurosci 6: 1178–1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ringstad N, Horvitz HR (2008) FMRFamide neuropeptides and acetylcholine synergistically inhibit egg-laying by C. elegans . Nat Neurosci 11: 1168–1176. 10.1038/nn.2186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Cohen M, Reale V, Olofsson B, Knights A, Evans P, deBono M (2009) Coordinated regulation of foraging and metabolism in C. elegans by RFamide neuropeptide signaling. Cell Metab 9: 375–385. 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Glauser DA, Chen WC, Agin R, Macinnis BL, Hellman AB, Garrity PA, et al. (2011) Heat avoidance is regulated by transient receptor potential (TRP) channels and a neuropeptide signaling pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans . Genetics 188: 91–103. 10.1534/genetics.111.127100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Wani KA, Catanese M, Normantowicz R, Herd M, Maher KN, Chase DL (2012) D1 dopamine receptor signaling is modulated by the R7 RGS protein EAT-16 and the R7 binding protein RSBP-1 in Caenoerhabditis elegans motor neurons. PLoS One 7: e37831 10.1371/journal.pone.0037831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Choi S, Chatzigeorgiou M, Taylor KP, Schafer WR, Kaplan JM (2013) Analysis of NPR-1 reveals a circuit mechanism for behavioral quiescence in C. elegans. Neuron 78: 869–880. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Li C, Timbers TA, Rose JK, Bozorgmehr T, McEwan A, Rankin CH (2013) The FMRFamide-related neuropeptide FLP-20 is required in the mechanosensory neurons during memory for massed training in C. elegans . Learn Mem 20: 103–108. 10.1101/lm.028993.112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Stawicki TM, Takayanagi-Kiya S, Zhou K, Jin Y (2013) Neuropeptides function in a homeostatic manner to modulate excitation-inhibition imbalance in C. elegans . PLoS Genet 9: e1003472 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kim K, Li C (2004) Expression and regulation of an FMRFamide-related neuropeptide gene family in Caenorhabditis elegans . J Comp Neurol 475: 540–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. White JG, Southgate E, Thomson JN, Brenner S (1986) The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 314: 1–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Alfonso A, Grundahl K, Duerr JS, Han HP, Rand JB (1993) The Caenorhabditis elegans unc-17 gene: a putative vesicular acetylcholine transporter. Science 261: 617–619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Alfonso A, Grundahl K, McManus JR, Rand JB (1994) Cloning and characterization of the choline acetyltransferase structural gene (cha-1) from C. elegans . J Neurosci 14: 2290–2300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Duerr JS, Han H-P, Fields SD, Rand JB (2008) Identification of major classes of cholinergic neurons in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . J Comp Neurol 506: 398–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. McIntire SL, Jorgensen E, Kaplan J, Horvitz HR (1993) The GABAergic nervous system of Caenorhabditis elegans . Nature 364: 337–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Trent C, Tsuing N, Horvitz HR (1983) Egg-laying defective mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . Genetics 104: 619–647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Schinkmann K, Li C (1992) Localization of FMRFamide-like peptides in Caenorhabditis elegans . J Comp Neurol 316: 251–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Brenner S (1974) The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans . Genetics 77: 71–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Dimitriadi M, Sleigh JN, Walker A, Chang HC, Sen A, Kalloo G, et al. (2010) Conserved genes act as modifiers of invertebrate SMN loss of function defects. PLoS Genet 6: e1001172 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Jansen G, Hazendonk E, Thijssen KL, Plasterk RH (1997) Reverse genetics by chemical mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans . Nat Genet 17: 119–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Gu T, Orita S, Han M (1998) Caenorhabditis elegans SUR-5, a novel but conserved protein, negatively regulates LET-60 Ras activity during vulval induction. Mol Cell Biol 18: 4556–4564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Okkema PG, Harrison SW, Plunger V, Aryana A, Fire A (1993) Sequence requirements for myosin gene expression and regulation in Caenorhabditis elegans . Genetics 135: 385–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Mello C, Fire A (1995) DNA transformation. Methods Cell Biol 48: 451–482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Miller KG, Alfonso A, Nguyen M, Crowell JA, Johnson CD, Rand JB (1996) A genetic selection for Caenorhabditis elegans synaptic transmission mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 12593–12598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Horvitz HR, Chalfie M, Trent C, Sulston JE, Evans PD (1982) Serotonin and octopamine in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . Science 216: 1012–1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Rosoff ML, Burglin TR, Li C (1992) Alternatively spliced transcripts of the flp-1 gene encode distinct FMRFamide-like peptides in Caenorhabditis elegans . J Neurosci 12: 2356–2361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Davis RE, Stretton AO (1996) The motornervous system of Ascaris: electrophysiology and anatomy of the neurons and their control by neuromodulators. Parasitology 113 Suppl: S97–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Husson SJ, Clynen E, Baggerman G, De Loof A, Schoofs L (2005) Discovering neuropeptides in Caenorhabditis elegans by two dimensional liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 335: 76–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Husson SJ, Clynen E, Baggerman G, Janssen T, Schoofs L (2006) Defective processing of neuropeptide precursors in Caenorhabditis elegans lacking proprotein convertase 2 (KPC-2/EGL-3): mutant analysis by mass spectrometry. J Neurochem 98: 1999–2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Husson SJ, Landuyt B, Nys T, Baggerman G, Boonen K, Clynen E,et al. (2009) Comparative peptidomics of Caenorhabditis elegans versus C. briggsae by LC-MALDI-TOF MS. Peptides 30: 449–457. 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.07.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Husson SJ, Schoofs L (2007) Altered neuropeptide profile of Caenorhabditis elegans lacking the chaperone protein 7B2 as analyzed by mass spectrometry. FEBS Lett 581: 4288–4292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Marks NJ, Maule AG, Geary TG, Thompson DP, Davis JP, Halton DW, et al. (1997) APEASPFIRFamide, a novel FMRFamide-related decapeptide from Caenorhabditis elegans: structure and myoactivity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 231: 591–595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Marks NJ, Maule AG, Geary TG, Thompson DP, Li C, Halton DW, et al. (1998) KSAYMRFamide (PF3/AF8) is present in the free-living nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans . Biochem Biophys Res Commun 248: 422–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Marks NJ, Maule AG, Li C, Nelson LS, Thompson DP, Alexander-Bowman S, et al. (1999) Isolation, pharmacology and gene organization of KPSFVRFamide: a neuropeptide from Caenorhabditis elegans . Biochem Biophys Res Commun 254: 222–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Marks NJ, Shaw C, Halton DW, Thompson DP, Geary TG, Li C, et al. (2001) Isolation and preliminary biological assessment of AADGAPLIRFamide and SVPGVLRFamide from Caenorhabditis elegans . Biochem Biophys Res Commun 286: 1170–1176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Marks NJ, Shaw C, Maule AG, Davis JP, Halton DW, Verhaert P,et al. (1995) Isolation of AF2 (KHEYLRFamide) from Caenorhabditis elegans: evidence for the presence of more than one FMRFamide-related peptide-encoding gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 217: 845–851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Rosoff ML, Doble KE, Price DA, Li C (1993) The flp-1 propeptide is processed into multiple, highly similar FMRFamide-like peptides in Caenorhabditis elegans . Peptides 14: 331–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Bargmann CI, Horvitz HR (1991) Chemosensory neurons with overlapping functions direct chemotaxis to multiple chemicals in C. elegans. Neuron 7: 729–742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Chalfie M, Sulston JE, White JG, Southgate E, Thomson JN, Brenner S (1985) The neural circuit for touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans . J Neurosci 5: 956–964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Way JC, Chalfie M (1989) The mec-3 gene of Caenorhabditis elegans requires its own product for maintained expression and is expressed in three neuronal cell types. Genes Dev 3: 1823–1833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Mori I, Ohshima Y (1995) Neural regulation of thermotaxis in Caenorhabditis elegans . Nature 376: 344–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Bretscher AJ, Kodama-Namba E, Busch KE, Murphy RJ, Soltesz Z, Laurent P, et al. (2011) Temperature, oxygen, and salt-sensing neurons in C. elegans are carbon dioxide sensors that control avoidance behavior. Neuron 69: 1099–1113. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Hallem EA, Sternberg PW (2008) Acute carbon dioxide avoidance in Caenorhabditis elegans . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 8038–8043. 10.1073/pnas.0707469105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Zimmer M, Gray JM, Pokala N, Chang AJ, Karow DS, Marietta MA, et al. (2009) Neurons detect increases and decreases in oxygen levels using distinct guanylate cyclases. Neuron 61: 865–879. 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.02.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Hardaker LA, Singer E, Kerr R, Zhou G, Schafer WR (2001) Serotonin modulates locomotory behavior and coordinates egg-laying and movement in Caenorhabditis elegans . J Neurobiol 49: 303–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Desai C, Garriga G, McIntire SL, Horvitz HR (1988) A genetic pathway for the development of the Caenorhabditis elegans HSN motor neurons. Nature 336: 638–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Waggoner LE, Zhou GT, Schafer RW, Schafer WR (1998) Control of alternative behavioral states by serotonin in Caenorhabditis elegans. Neuron 21: 203–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Albeg A, Smith CJ, Chatzigeorgiou M, Feitelson DG, Hall DH, Schafer WR, et al. (2011) C. elegans multi-dendritic sensory neurons: morphology and function. Mol Cell Neurosci 46: 308–317. 10.1016/j.mcn.2010.10.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Schafer WR (2005) Egg-laying. WormBook: 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Tsalik EL, Hobert O (2003) Functional mapping of neurons that control locomotory behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans . J Neurobiol 56: 178–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. de Bono M, Tobin DM, Davis MW, Avery L, Bargmann CI (2002) Social feeding in Caenorhabditis elegans is induced by neurons that detect aversive stimuli. Nature 419: 899–903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Keating CD, Kriek N, Daniels M, Ashcroft NR, Hopper NA, Siney EJ, et al. (2003) Whole-genome analysis of 60 G protein-coupled receptors in Caenorhabditis elegans by gene knockout with RNAi. Curr Biol 13: 1715–1720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Li C, Kim K (2014) Family of FLP Peptides in Caenorhabditis elegans and Related Nematodes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 5: 150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper. All raw data are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1538660.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES