Skip to main content
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report logoLink to Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
. 2015 Jul 3;64(25):695–698.

Sodium Intake Among U.S. Adults — 26 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2013

Jing Fang 1,, Mary E Cogswell 1, Soyoun Park 1, Sandra L Jackson 1, Erika C Odom 1
PMCID: PMC4584681  PMID: 26135590

Excess sodium intake is a major risk factor for hypertension, and subsequently, heart disease and stroke, the first and fifth leading causes of U.S. deaths, respectively (1). During 2011–2012, the average daily sodium intake among U.S. adults was estimated to be 3,592 mg (2), above the Healthy People 2020 target of 2,300 mg (3). To support strategies to reduce dietary sodium intake, 2013 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data from states and territories that implemented the new sodium-related behavior module were assessed. Across 26 states, the District of Columbia (DC), and Puerto Rico, 39%–73% of adults reported taking action (i.e., watching or reducing sodium intake) (median = 51%), and 14%–41% reported receiving advice from a health professional to reduce sodium intake (median = 22%). Compared with adults without hypertension, a higher percentage of adults with self-reported hypertension reported taking action and receiving advice to reduce sodium intake. For states that implemented the module, these results can serve as a baseline to monitor the effects of programs designed to reduce sodium intake.

BRFSS is an annual, random-digit–dialed telephone survey representative of noninstitutionalized, civilian adults aged ≥18 years in each U.S. state and territory. Detailed information on the survey is available at http://www.cdc.gov/brfss. In 2013, 26 states, DC, and Puerto Rico implemented the new, optional sodium-related behavior module. The median American Association of Public Opinion Research location-specific response rate was 48.1% (range = 31.1%–60.3%) (4).

Taking action to reduce sodium intake was defined by a “yes” response to the question, “Are you currently watching or reducing your sodium or salt intake?” Receiving health professional advice to reduce sodium intake was defined by a “yes” response to the question, “Has a doctor or other health professional ever advised you to reduce sodium or salt intake?” Self-reported hypertension was defined by a “yes” response to the question, “Have you ever been told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that you have high blood pressure?” The percentage of respondents taking action or receiving advice to reduce sodium intake was estimated for each state overall and by self-reported hypertension status. All estimates were age-standardized using the 2000 U.S. standard projected population. States were categorized in quartiles based on age-standardized proportions of respondents reporting taking action to reduce sodium intake and on proportions reporting having received advice to reduce sodium intake.

A total of 185,463 participants answered questions from the optional sodium module. After excluding 5,396 participants with missing information on key variables, 180,067 participants were included. State sample sizes ranged from 3,332 (Massachusetts) to 12,363 (Minnesota). The proportion of respondents who reported taking action to reduce sodium intake ranged from 38.7% (Utah) to 73.4% (Puerto Rico), with a median of 50.6% (Table 1). Across all participating locations, a higher proportion of participants with hypertension reported taking action to reduce sodium intake compared with those without hypertension (p<0.001 for all comparisons) (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Age-adjusted percentage of adults aged ≥18 years who reported taking action to reduce their dietary sodium intake, by hypertension status — 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013

Overall Self-reported hypertension No self-reported hypertension



State/Area No. % (95% CI) No. % (95% CI) No. % (95% CI)
Arkansas 4,469 52.6 (50.3–54.9) 2,231 62.9 (57.6–67.8) 2,238 47.1 (44.4–49.8)
Connecticut 6,547 50.7 (48.8–52.6) 2,589 67.7 (62.6–72.4) 3,958 44.0 (41.9–46.2)
DC 3,990 54.8 (52.2–57.4) 1,623 70.8 (63.7–77.0) 2,367 47.8 (44.7–50.8)
Hawaii 6,992 55.8 (54.0–57.5) 2,204 63.2 (57.9–68.2) 4,788 52.8 (50.8–54.8)
Indiana 4,362 45.2 (43.3–47.3) 1,904 57.0 (51.9–62.0) 2,458 39.8 (37.5–42.1)
Iowa 7,210 45.5 (43.9–47.1) 2,889 57.7 (53.1–62.2) 4,321 40.6 (38.9–42.4)
Kansas 10,947 43.3 (42.1–44.4) 4,455 55.9 (52.5–59.1) 6,492 37.7 (36.4–39.1)
Kentucky 9,704 50.5 (48.9–52.1) 4,717 72.4 (69.0–75.6) 4,987 39.2 (37.2–41.1)
Maine 4,496 52.3 (50.3–54.4) 1,807 67.7 (61.5–73.3) 2,689 47.6 (45.2–49.9)
Maryland 11,473 52.2 (50.7–53.7) 4,907 63.7 (60.1–67.2) 6,566 46.4 (44.6–48.1)
Massachusetts 3,332 49.8 (46.5–53.2) 1,343 61.7 (50.9–71.5) 1,989 45.4 (41.7–49.1)
Minnesota 12,363 40.7 (39.2–42.3) 4,256 52.9 (48.9–56.8) 8,107 35.2 (33.3–37.1)
Mississippi 6,628 56.3 (54.4–58.1) 3,514 66.1 (61.8–70.1) 3,114 48.6 (46.2–50.9)
Missouri 5,478 51.2 (48.9–53.5) 2,527 58.6 (53.3–63.6) 2,951 46.9 (44.2–49.6)
Montana 4,517 44.9 (42.9–46.9) 1,706 55.3 (50.0–60.6) 2,811 40.0 (37.7–42.3)
Nebraska 7,667 44.8 (43.0–46.6) 3,095 56.2 (51.4–61.0) 4,572 39.5 (37.4–41.5)
New Jersey 3,700 59.3 (56.8–61.8) 1,365 71.9 (63.6–79.0) 2,335 54.5 (51.5–57.3)
North Carolina 3,824 58.2 (56.1–60.4) 1,749 70.8 (65.2–75.8) 2,075 53.2 (50.6–55.8)
North Dakota 6,932 45.7 (44.0–47.3) 2,583 60.7 (55.2–65.9) 4,349 40.4 (38.5–42.3)
Ohio 7,138 46.0 (44.3–47.7) 3,078 56.8 (52.5–61.0) 4,060 40.0 (38.0–42.1)
Oklahoma 3,846 51.8 (49.6–53.9) 1,808 59.8 (54.4–65.0) 2,038 46.9 (44.3–49.4)
Tennessee 4,771 53.8 (51.7–55.9) 2,343 63.3 (56.9–69.3) 2,428 47.3 (44.7–50.0)
Utah 5,997 38.8 (37.3–40.2) 1,854 49.6 (45.3–54.0) 4,143 34.8 (33.1–36.5)
Virginia 7,045 55.2 (53.6–56.8) 2,859 67.9 (64.0–71.6) 4,186 49.1 (47.2–51.0)
Washington 9,918 49.0 (47.6–50.4) 3,888 60.2 (56.4–63.9) 6,030 42.6 (42.0–45.2)
West Virginia 5,578 43.4 (41.8–45.1) 2,619 56.5 (52.8–60.2) 2,959 35.9 (34.0–37.9)
Wisconsin 5,360 44.3 (42.1–46.5) 2,174 60.1 (54.0–65.9) 3,186 37.0 (34.5–39.7)
Puerto Rico 5,783 73.4 (71.8–74.9) 2,896 80.0 (76.6–83.0) 2,887 70.0 (67.9–72.0)

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DC = District of Columbia.

The proportion of participants who reported receiving advice from a health professional to reduce sodium intake ranged from 13.5% (Minnesota) to 41.4% (Puerto Rico), with a median of 21.1%. Across all locations, a higher proportion of participants with hypertension reported receiving health professional advice to reduce sodium intake compared with those without hypertension (p<0.001 for all comparisons) (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Age-adjusted percentage of adults aged ≥18 years who reported being advised by a health professional to reduce dietary sodium intake, by hypertension status — 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013

Overall Self-reported hypertension No self-reported hypertension



State/Area No. % (95% CI) No. % (95% CI) No. % (95% CI)
Arkansas 4,475 22.6 (20.8–24.4) 2,225 44.5 (39.6–49.5) 2,250 10.7 (9.1–12.6)
Connecticut 6,551 21.7 (20.2–23.2) 2,586 49.9 (44.9–55.0) 3,965 10.9 (9.5–12.5)
DC 3,996 27.4 (25.3–29.6) 1,622 60.7 (53.8–67.2) 2,374 13.3 (11.4–15.5)
Hawaii 6,977 24.3 (22.8–25.8) 2,195 49.1 (44.6–53.7) 4,782 14.8 (13.4–16.4)
Indiana 4,360 20.5 (19.1–22.0) 1,898 40.5 (36.3–44.9) 2,462 9.8 (8.5–11.3)
Iowa 7,186 17.8 (16.7–19.0) 2,874 40.4 (36.2–44.7) 4,312 8.9 (7.9–10.1)
Kansas 10,932 17.0 (16.2–17.8) 4,428 37.1 (34.0–40.3) 6,504 7.9 (7.2–8.7)
Kentucky 9,677 28.2 (26.9–29.5) 4,689 60.3 (56.5–63.9) 4,988 10.1 (9.0–11.3)
Maine 4,490 19.3 (17.8–20.8) 1,794 45.8 (39.7–52.0) 2,696 9.1 (7.9–10.6)
Maryland 11,489 23.8 (22.6–25.0) 4,898 48.5 (44.7–52.4) 6,591 12.4 (11.2–13.6)
Massachusetts 3,323 18.1 (16.1–20.3) 1,336 37.8 (31.4–44.7) 1,987 9.2 (7.4–11.5)
Minnesota 12,398 13.5 (12.4–14.6) 4,249 31.7 (28.0–35.7) 8,149 7.0 (6.0–8.2)
Mississippi 6,610 27.0 (25.5–28.5) 3,503 49.3 (45.0–53.5) 3,107 12.6 (11.1–14.2)
Missouri 5,457 19.8 (18.3–21.4) 2,502 45.0 (39.2–51.0) 2,955 9.9 (8.5–11.4)
Montana 4,508 13.8 (12.5–15.1) 1,693 33.3 (28.1–38.8) 2,815 6.2 (5.2–7.3)
Nebraska 7,660 17.1 (15.9–18.3) 3,086 35.1 (31.0–39.5) 4,574 8.5 (7.4–9.7)
New Jersey 3,715 23.5 (21.6–25.5) 1,359 50.5 (42.8–58.2) 2,356 12.5 (10.7–14.6)
North Carolina 3,808 24.1 (22.4–25.8) 1,735 47.1 (41.9–52.4) 2,073 12.3 (10.7–14.0)
North Dakota 6,941 15.1 (14.1–16.2) 2,569 36.6 (31.9–41.5) 4,372 6.5 (5.6–7.5)
Ohio 7,160 20.2 (18.9–21.5) 3,076 40.9 (37.0–44.9) 4,084 9.8 (8.6–11.2)
Oklahoma 3,835 22.6 (21.0–24.2) 1,798 40.3 (35.4–45.4) 2,037 12.4 (10.9–14.2)
Tennessee 4,756 23.2 (21.5–25.0) 2,329 41.9 (37.9–46.0) 2,427 11.5 (9.9–13.3)
Utah 5,988 14.5 (13.5–15.6) 1,842 35.5 (31.3–39.8) 4,146 6.7 (5.9–7.7)
Virginia 7,065 22.6 (21.4–23.9) 2,857 48.8 (45.0–52.6) 4,208 10.1 (9.0–11.2)
Washington 9,926 17.7 (16.7–18.7) 3,871 40.3 (36.6–44.1) 6,055 8.3 (7.4–9.2)
West Virginia 5,557 22.4 (21.1–23.6) 2,597 43.1 (39.4–46.9) 2,960 9.8 (8.7–11.0)
Wisconsin 5,350 18.6 (16.9–20.4) 2,169 41.4 (35.6–47.3) 3,181 8.6 (7.0–10.6)
Puerto Rico 5,781 41.4 (39.7–43.0) 2,896 61.6 (57.9–65.1) 2,885 27.2 (25.2–29.2)

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DC = District of Columbia.

Although only 10 of the 28 survey areas were in the Southern U.S. Census Region,* most of the survey areas with the highest proportions of respondents reporting taking action to reduce sodium intake and most of those with the highest proportion of respondents reporting having received advice from a health professional to reduce sodium intake were in the South. Eight of 10 states in the South were in the top two quartiles for taking action; the two that were not in the top two quartiles were West Virginia and Kentucky (Figure 1). All 10 states in the South were in the top two quartiles for receiving advice. The other four survey areas in the top half were Connecticut, New Jersey, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico (Figure 2).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Age-adjusted percentage of adults aged ≥18 years who reported taking action to reduce their dietary sodium intake — 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Age-adjusted percentage of adults aged ≥18 years who reported being advised by a health professional to reduce dietary sodium intake — 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013

Discussion

In 2013, across 26 states, DC, and Puerto Rico, the proportion of respondents who reported both taking action and receiving advice to reduce sodium intake varied, with generally higher proportions in states in the Southern U.S. Census Region, Missouri, some states in the Northeastern U.S. Census Region, and Puerto Rico. Overall, approximately half of U.S. adults in participating states and territories reported taking action to reduce sodium intake, and about one in five reported receiving advice from a health professional to reduce sodium intake. Respondents with self-reported hypertension were more likely to take action and receive advice to reduce sodium intake than those without. However, among adults with self-reported hypertension, 20% (Puerto Rico) to 50% (Utah) did not report taking action to reduce sodium intake. In all but four locations (DC, Kentucky, New Jersey, and Puerto Rico), less than half of respondents reported receiving advice to reduce sodium intake. Among adults without hypertension, most did not report taking action to reduce sodium intake, and an even smaller proportion reported receiving professional advice to reduced sodium. These findings suggest an opportunity for promoting strategies to reduce sodium consumption among all adults, with and without hypertension.

This is the first report with state-level estimates of sodium intake behavior among the general population. The geographic pattern of the prevalence of taking action or receiving advice to reduce sodium intake appears to roughly correspond with the pattern of the prevalence of self-reported hypertension (5). BRFSS 2009 data indicate the prevalence of self-reported hypertension is generally higher in the Southern U.S. Census Region, plus Indiana, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. A possible explanation for the higher prevalence of taking action and receiving health professional advice to reduce sodium intake in Connecticut and New Jersey could be proximity to New York City’s (NYC) media campaign promoting sodium reduction and other NYC and state programs aimed at reducing sodium intake. For example, in April 2013, NYC launched a communication campaign for consumers to purchase lower-sodium foods.

The finding that Puerto Rico had the highest percentage of respondents both taking action and receiving advice for sodium reduction is new. The high percentages might be related to high hypertension prevalence. Based on 2013 BRFSS data, the prevalence of self-reported hypertension in Puerto Rico was 42.3%, whereas the national prevalence was 31.4% (6).

The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, BRFSS data are self-reported and subject to recall and social desirability bias, which might overestimate or underestimate prevalence. Second, the methods used by participants to watch or reduce sodium intake were not assessed. Third, these results are not generalizable to the entire United States. Although CDC encouraged states to use the module to assess the sodium-related behavior, the reasons individual states chose to use the module is unknown. Finally, response bias is possible because BRFSS response rates were <50%. Despite these limitations, this report is the first to provide multistate data on sodium-reduction behavior among all BRFSS respondents.

The data in this report highlight the opportunity to increase the proportion of health care professionals who advise their patients to reduce sodium intake and the proportion of U.S. adults who take action to reduce sodium intake. During 2011–2012, approximately 48% of hypertension among U.S. adults was uncontrolled (7). From 2010 to 2030, total direct medical costs of cardiovascular disease are projected to triple, increasing from $273 billion to $818 billion (in 2008 U.S. dollars) (8). Reducing sodium intake by 1,200 mg daily is projected to save $18 billion in health care costs yearly (9). Health care professionals can make a difference by recommending healthy dietary patterns, such as the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (10). By expanding the use of the sodium-related behavior module, states can enhance the ability to evaluate the effects of sodium-reduction campaigns.

Summary

What is already known on this topic?

National surveillance data show that current sodium intake in the United States is substantially higher than recommended. Excess sodium intake is an important risk factor for hypertension.

What is added by this report?

In 2013, among 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, the median prevalence of taking action to reduce sodium intake was 51%, ranging from 39% to 73%. The median prevalence of receiving health professional advice to reduce sodium intake was 22%, ranging from 14% to 41%. Although action and advice were higher among hypertensive participants across locations, 20%–50% did not report taking action, and 38%–68% reported not receiving advice to reduce sodium intake.

What are the implications for public health practice?

These data highlight the opportunity to increase the proportion of health professionals who advise their patients to reduce sodium intake and the proportion of U.S. adults who take action to reduce sodium intake.

Footnotes

*

South Census region includes Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia.

References


Articles from Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

RESOURCES