Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Sep 21;5:14199. doi: 10.1038/srep14199

Adaptation of Lactococcus lactis to high growth temperature leads to a dramatic increase in acidification rate

Jun Chen 1, Jing Shen 1, Lars Ingvar Hellgren 2, Peter Ruhdal Jensen 1,a, Christian Solem 1,a
PMCID: PMC4585701  PMID: 26388459

Abstract

Lactococcus lactis is essential for most cheese making, and this mesophilic bacterium has its growth optimum around 30 °C. We have, through adaptive evolution, isolated a mutant TM29 that grows well up to 39 °C, and continuous growth at 40 °C is possible if pre-incubated at a slightly lower temperature. At the maximal permissive temperature for the wild-type, 38 °C, TM29 grows 33% faster and has a 12% higher specific lactate production rate than its parent MG1363, which results in fast lactate accumulation. Genome sequencing was used to reveal the mutations accumulated, most of which were shown to affect thermal tolerance. Of the mutations with more pronounced effects, two affected expression of single proteins (chaperone; riboflavin transporter), two had pleiotropic effects (RNA polymerase) which changed the gene expression profile, and one resulted in a change in the coding sequence of CDP-diglyceride synthase. A large deletion containing 10 genes was also found to affect thermal tolerance significantly. With this study we demonstrate a simple approach to obtain non-GMO derivatives of the important L. lactis that possess properties desirable by the industry, e.g. thermal robustness and increased rate of acidification. The mutations we have identified provide a genetic basis for further investigation of thermal tolerance.


Lactococcus lactis (L. lactis) is a Gram-positive bacterium, belonging to the group of lactic acid bacteria (LAB). The main fermentation product usually is lactic acid, and glycolysis is the main source for energy1. L. lactis is mostly known for its enormous importance in the dairy industry, where more than 100 million tons of milk annually is inoculated with this bacterium for production of various fermented dairy products2. Moreover, the many years of safe use has made L. lactis a favoured candidate for other important applications as well, e.g. as a delivery vehicle for vaccines and therapeutic peptides for human use3 and as a production platform for various compounds4,5,6.

L. lactis experiences many environmental stresses during industrial handling, and it is highly important that that strains used are sufficiently robust to ensure optimal performance under these conditions. Typical stresses are imposed by factors such as heat, oxygen, low pH and high salinity. In cheese production, for instance, during the curdling process, the temperature is often raised to around 40 °C, or even beyond, and here L. lactis stops growing and lactate production is drastically reduced (personal communication Søren Lillevang, ARLA foods).

Heat stress is one of the most extensively studied topics for L. lactis and thermally robust strains are interesting for the industry, not only for robustness issues but also because a high fermentation temperature could have other advantages such as faster acidification, less by-product formation, and a reduced risk of phage infection7,8,9. Many studies have focused on the molecular basis of the heat stress response and especially a large effort has been made to understand the important roles of heat shock proteins (HSPs) and their regulatory mechanisms. The chaperone complexes DnaK-GrpE-DnaJ and GroES- GroEL have considerable importance, not only in protein folding, relocation and assembly10, but also for other biological processes such as cell membrane stabilization and DNA replication10,11 when cells are exposed to heat. Over-expression of HSPs has been demonstrated to improve the thermal tolerance of L. lactis. For instance, the over-expression of GroES-GroEL in L. lactis significantly improved the thermal tolerance and the tolerance to other stresses12.

When the heterologous DnaK from E. coli was over-expressed in L. lactis, the strain grew at a higher temperature, and a higher specific productivity of lactate was observed13. Substantial over-expression of genes, however, can lead to a decline in growth rate, which affects the volumetric productivity14, and in addition, for food applications such GMO strains are currently not acceptable in many parts of the world15.

Adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE), which allows for the selection of desirable phenotypes through the simulation of natural evolution in a laboratory environment, gradually has become a popular tool for obtaining microorganisms with particular properties. During ALE, genetic variations occur across the chromosome, and beneficial mutations, which are able to improve growth rate, are fixed. ALE also allows for genetic reorganisations towards optimal phenotypes to various conditions without prior knowledge. So far, ALE has been applied for isolating thermo-tolerant mutants of well-characterized platform organisms such as E. coli and S. cerevisiae16,17, but the distinctive genetic backgrounds and ecological niches where these organisms thrive, makes it difficult to compare the results obtained with those obtained for an LAB like L. lactis. In this study, we have used ALE to isolate a thermo-tolerant L. lactis mutant, TM29, which produces lactate at a faster rate at high temperatures. Our starting point was the well-characterized laboratory strain L. lactis ssp. cremoris MG136318. After exposure to high temperatures in chemically defined medium using a serial-transfer regime, a mutant capable of growing at 40 °C was isolated. Physiological and trancriptomic characterization was conducted at different temperatures. We also identified the mutations accumulated by using Next-Generation Sequencing, which allowed us to reveal the genetic alterations involved in the thermal adaptation. Furthermore, the contribution of the individual mutations to thermal tolerance was evaluated by introducing them into the wild-type background.

Results

Physiological characterization of TM29 and MG1363 at different temperatures

After a long-term thermal adaptation (860 generations), TM29 was isolated. This strain was able to grow at 40 °C, which is ten degrees above the normal optimal growth temperature of the parent strain (Fig. 1A). It was found that the optimum growth temperature of TM29 had been shifted from 30 °C to 36 °C, and the maximum specific growth rate (1.16 ± 0.02 h−1) was similar to the optimum of that of its parent, MG1363 (1.13 ± 0.03 h−1). Above 34 °C, the growth rate of TM29 was significantly higher than that of MG1363. The growth of MG1363 ceased at 39 °C, where no increase in cell density was observed after 24 hours of cultivation. TM29 could grow at 40 °C continuously, but this required the preculture to be incubated at slightly lower temperatures. Due to this reason, 40 °C was excluded for the following characterization. The growth curves for both MG1363 and TM29 are presented in Fig. 1B at two different temperatures. At 30 °C, MG1363 overall grew slightly faster than TM29. When the temperature was shifted to 38 °C, the exponential growth of TM29 was hardly affected, while MG1363 experienced a long lag-phase and slower growth during the exponential phase.

Figure 1. Growth characteristics of MG1363 and TM29 at different temperatures.

Figure 1

(A) maximum specific growth rate as a function of temperature. Three independent experiments were performed for both strains at different temperatures. *the pre-culture of TM29 was incubated at 37 °C; (B) growth curves at 30 °C and 38 °C. The standard deviations were calculated from three independent experiments.

In Fig. 2, the specific glucose consumption and product formation rates can be seen. The glucose and lactate fluxes increased with temperature for both MG1363 and TM29, but the increase was larger for TM29, that had an approximately 12% higher flux at 38 °C than MG1363. It was also observed that the mixed-acid products formate and acetate were formed in smaller amounts as the temperature increased. At 39 °C, even though the specific production rate of lactate and maximum specific growth rate of TM29 were slightly reduced compared to those at 38 °C, the production rates of the by-products such as acetate and formate significantly declined.

Figure 2. The specific consumption rate of glucose and specific production rate of lactate, formate and acetate at different temperatures in MG1363 and TM29.

Figure 2

The unit of flux was mmol per hour per gram cell dry weight. N. D., not determined (no growth) LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PFL, pyruvate-formate lyase; ACK, acetate kinase.

Another intriguing observation was that the cell dry weight to OD600 ratio decreased with increasing temperature for MG1363, but not for TM29 (Figure S1). Phase-contrast imaging revealed swelling of MG1363 at high temperatures whereas TM29 remained unaffected (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Comparison of cell size between MG1363 and TM29 at different temperatures using a phase-contrast microcope.

Figure 3

Transcriptional analysis of MG1363 and TM29 at different temperatures using DNA microarray

To compare the effect of temperature and mutations on global transcription, a transcriptional analysis was carried out using single-channel microarrays. We used two different comparisons for the significantly differentially expressed genes (fold change ≥1.5; adjust p-value ≤0.05): the response to the elevated growth temperature of MG1363 and TM29 respectively (38 °C vs. 30 °C) and the difference in global transcription between MG1363 and TM29 at high temperatures (38 °C).

When the transcriptional profiles were compared for the individual strains, a total of 758 and 650 genes were found to be differentially expressed in MG1363 and TM29, respectively (38 °C vs. 30 °C) (Table S1 & S2). We found that several heat shock proteins were up-regulated, and this occurred in both MG1363 and TM29. Among these genes, the clpB,C,E and P are involved in degrading misfolded proteins under stress conditions19. The dnaK, grpE, groES and groEL encode chaperones that assist refolding of proteins12,13, and the hrcA encodes a heat shock regulator20. The arcA, B, C1, C2, D1, which are involved in the arginine deiminase (ADI) pathway, were also up-regulated in both MG1363 and TM29. Moreover, in response to the elevated growth temperature, 18 regulators were up-regulated in both strains, such as rmaA, rmaB, rmaX, rmaI, rmeB and rmeC. In MG1363 an additional 14 specific regulators and 4 two-component signal transduction regulation genes llrD, llrB, kinD, and kinE were up-regulated. It was also noticed that, the riboflavin biosynthesis operon (ribA, B, D, H)21 was up-regulated, but only in MG1363. Although the higher growth temperature led to a higher glycolytic activity, none of the glycolytic genes were found to be differentially expressed in either MG1363 or TM29. Most of the genes found to be down-regulated in MG1363 and TM29, had a putative status.

When the transcriptional profiles were compared between the two strains at 38 °C (TM29 vs. MG1363), 297 and 271 genes were found to be up-regulated and down-regulated, respectively (Table S3). In order to clarify the function of these differentially expressed genes, gene functional classification by DAVID22 was applied using GO terms (Biological Process). Only one term was over-represented, namely “transport” (41 genes; p-value = 3.4E-5) for the up-regulated genes, and no terms were found over-represented for the down-regulated genes. In “transport”, most of the genes were found to encode diverse carbohydrate, amino acid and ion transporters (Table 1).

Table 1. The list of up-regulated transporter genes in the GO term “transport” (TM29 vs. MG1363 at 38 °C).

Gene name logFC Adj.P.Val Annotation
llmg_1747 0.6 1.9E-02 Amino acid permease
lmrC 0.6 1.0E-03 Multidrug resistance protein C
rgpC 0.6 1.1E-04 Capsule polysaccharide export inner-membrane protein RgpC
copA 0.6 1.3E-02 Copper/potassium-transporting ATPase
ptnD 0.7 4.7E-02 PTS system, mannose-specific IID component
glnP 0.7 4.9E-04 Glutamine ABC transporter permease and substrate binding protein
mntH 0.7 1.4E-02 Putative proton-dependent manganese transporter group C beta
oppC2 0.7 9.8E-04 Oligopeptide transport system permease protein oppC2
eriC 0.7 2.1E-04 Putative chloride channel protein
rbsD 0.7 1.2E-04 D-ribose pyranase
llmg_1086 0.8 1.1E-03 Similar to cation (Calcium) transporting ATPase
oppB2 0.8 4.0E-04 Peptide transport system permease protein oppB2
dinF 0.8 3.5E-05 Damage-inducible protein DinF
llmg_1016 0.8 1.7E-05 Cationic transporter
secY 0.8 3.7E-05 Protein translocase subunit SecY
llmg_2541 0.8 2.3E-05 Cation transporting ATPase
rbsC 0.9 1.9E-02 Ribose transport system permease protein RbsC
lysQ 0.9 3.2E-05 Amino-acid permease lysQ
pacL 1.0 3.9E-04 Cation-transporting ATPase, E1-E2 family
cydD 1.0 9.7E-07 Cytochrome D ABC transporter ATP binding and permease protein
llmg_0375 1.0 5.4E-05 Amino acid permease
cydC 1.1 2.7E-06 Cytochrome D ABC transporter ATP binding and permease protein
llmg_0268 1.1 3.5E-06 ABC transporter ATP binding protein
pmrA 1.1 2.3E-05 Multidrug resistance efflux pump
llmg_0989 1.1 8.8E-06 ABC transporter ATP binding and permease protein
llmg_0870 1.1 1.6E-05 Transporter
ypbC 1.2 5.3E-05 Putative membrane protein
llmg_2011 1.2 3.8E-05 Putative amino acid permease
pbuX 1.3 2.3E-05 Xanthine/uracil permease
glcU 1.3 2.2E-07 Putative glucose uptake protein glcU
llmg_0269 1.3 5.3E-05 ABC transporter ATP-binding and permease protein
cbiO 1.3 5.7E-08 Putative cobalt ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
comGB 1.3 1.6E-07 Putative competence protein ComGB
llmg_1474 1.4 9.9E-06 Putative voltage gated chloride channel
comGC 1.4 2.6E-08 Putative competence protein ComGC
llmg_1426 1.5 3.0E-06 Sucrose-specific PTS system IIBC component
comGA 1.6 5.5E-09 Putative competence protein ComGA
cbiQ 1.6 3.3E-09 Putative cobalt ABC transporter permease protein
arcD1 1.7 4.7E-07 Arginine/ornithine antiporter
nha 2.0 3.9E-06 Na+/H+ antiporter
llmg_1993 2.1 1.8E-07 Hypothetical transporter

Sequencing the genome of the mutant

In order to identify the mutations responsible for the thermal tolerance of TM29, its genome was sequenced. By comparing to the published L. lactis MG1363 sequence23,24 it was possible to determine all the mutations, which are listed in Table 2. A total of 15 mutations, consisting of 13 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), 1 single-nucleotide indel (DIP) and one large deletion (11K bases), were identified. The large deletion was found to be a fragment consisting of 10 genes (llmg_1349–llmg_1358), and it was flanked by two imperfectly matched DNA repeats (reference position: 1321034–1322303; 1333535–1334779, 1249 bp; 99% identity). Sanger sequencing confirmed that the excision had occurred as a consequence of homologous recombination between these repeats.

Table 2. Mutations identified in the temperature-adapted mutant TM29.

Referencea Variationb Changed Gene Protein Amino acid
208637 SNP A→G llmg_0219 Putative membrane protein Thr→Ala
230889 SNP G→A llmg_0242 Probable transcriptional regulatory protein Gly→Arg
403714 SNP C→T Intergenic    
598835 SNP C→T pabC Putative aminodeoxychorismate lyase Pro→Ser
905914 SNP G→A trmD tRNA (guanine-N(1)-)-methyltransferase Val→Ile
927877 SNP T→A llmg_0962 Transcriptional regulator, araC family Cys→Stop
945240 DIP —→G tnp904 Transposase for insertion sequence IS904F Frameshift
1078271 SNP A→G pfk 6-phosphofructokinase Silent mutation
1164619 SNP C→G Intergenic    
1966122 SNP C→T rpoC DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit beta′ Gly→Arg
1966323 SNP C→T rpoC DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit beta′ Glu→Lys
2358022 SNP G→A cdsA Phosphatidate cytidylyltransferase Pro→Leu
2434453 SNP G→A llmg_2477 Lysine specific permease Ala→Ser
2497054 SNP G→A llmg_2541 Cation transporting ATPase Ala→Thr
1322282-     llmg_1349-    
  DEL  
1334514     llmg_1358    

aReference position refers to the genome sequence of L. lactis MG1363 (GenBank accession # AM406671).

bSNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; DIP, deletion/insertion polymorphism; DEL, large deletion.

Most single-base mutations occurred in protein coding regions, but two intergenic ones were also observed. One intergenic mutation (Reference position: 403714) located in the CIRCE (Controlling Inverted Repeat of Chaperone Expression) element, a binding site of repressor proteins preceding the groESL operon25, and the other (Reference position: 1164619) preceded the CDS of RibU, a riboflavin transporter, and this mutation was located in an uncharacterized region upstream the ribosome binding site26. One intriguing observation was that mutations in rpoC, encoding the RNA polymerase β’ subunit, occurred twice within 200 bp on the chromosome.

Assessing the contribution of individual mutations to tolerance at elevated temperatures

Genome sequencing and microarray analysis revealed the changes in the mutant at a genomic and transcriptional level, but did not provide a direct link between these and the improved fitness at elevated temperatures. To analyse the contribution of the individual mutations, each of them was introduced into MG1363, and the detailed genetic backgrounds of these strains are listed in Table S4. As some of these mutants containing the single mutation exhibited unstable growth at 39 °C, the thermal tolerance was, instead, assessed by a growth assay involving serially diluted cultures (10 times’ dilutions), and MG1363 and TM29 were included as benchmarks. Figure 4 shows that the occurrence of growth for each allelic replaced mutant at 39 °C, where no growth was observed for MG1363 and the pabC mutant in the lowest dilution 100. Most of the other mutations were found to improve the thermal tolerance of MG1363 at 39 °C, where growth occurred in the dilution 10−1 or 10−2 (10 times and 100 times diluted compared to 10 °). Especially, the mutations in cdsA and rpoC and the mutation preceding groESL had a significant impact on the thermal tolerance compared to the other mutations, and these mutants enabled growth in the 10−2 dilution after 48 hours. However, none of these single mutations were able to render MG1363 as tolerant as TM29, and the growth of TM29 occurred in the 10−2 dilution within 24 hours.

Figure 4. Growth performance of the allele replaced mutants, and the knockout mutants at 39 °C. Growth performance was assessed by occurrence of growth in serially diluting cultures with a pre-determined number of cells at the beginning, and registering growth after 48 hours of incubation at 39 °C.

Figure 4

The test was repeated for four times. 100, 10−1 and 10−2 represents 0, 10 and 100 times’ diluted cultures respectively. Occurrence of growth in different dilutions was indicated by “+”, and no growth was indicated by “−”. The detailed procedure is described in the Methods. *Growth occurred in the 10−2 dilution within 24 hours.

The effect of the SNPs preceding groESL and ribU

Two SNPs occurred just upstream the CDS of groESL and ribU, and these were suspected to alter gene expression. To substantiate this, the wild-type and mutated promoters were fused to gusA, and β-glucuronidase activities determined as a measure for promoter strength. Figure 5 shows that the presence of the mutation upstream groESL resulted in a more than two-fold higher expression in an MG1363 background at both 30 °C and 38 °C when compared to the wild-type promoter.

Figure 5. Assessment of the strength of native and mutated groESL and ribU promoters at 30 °C and 38 °C using gusA transcriptional fusions.

Figure 5

The results are based on three biological replicates. The strain numbers are referred in Table S4.

Similarly, the mutation upstream ribU resulted in six-times over-expression at both low and high temperatures. Riboflavin is one of the prototrophic nutrients, which is generally not required for growth of L. lactis21. However, the situation could be different at elevated temperatures. In order to investigate whether riboflavin is important for growth at elevated temperatures, both strains were grown in medium with or without riboflavin at different temperatures. Figure 6 shows that the growth of both MG1363 and TM29 were significantly reduced above 34 °C without riboflavin, but TM29 was still able to grow faster than MG1363.

Figure 6. The maximum specific growth rate as a function of temperature for MG1363 and TM29 in medium with or without riboflavin.

Figure 6

The mutations in rpoC affect global transcription and the fatty acid composition

Mutations in rpoC have previously been reported to result in numerous changes to the transcriptional profile in other organisms, and could in principle affect a variety of phenotypes27,28. To determine whether the rpoC mutations obtained in this study had the same pleiotropic effect, the effect of the rpoC mutations on expression of several of the transporter genes, that were found to be up-regulated in TM29, was examined in a wild-type background (MG1363 with the rpoC mutations = JC030) using RT-qPCR. The outcome can be seen in Table 3. It can clearly be seen that several of these genes are up-regulated in both TM29 and JC030 at 38 °C when compared to MG1363 at 38 °C, thus demonstrating the pleiotropic effect of the rpoC mutations under these conditions.

Table 3. List of representative up-regulated genes in both TM29 and JC030 compared with MG1363 at 38 °C.

Gene Expression ratioa Microarray p-value Expression ratioa qPCR p-value
TM29 vs. MG1363 JC030 vs. MG1363
arcD1 3.14 0.00 1.96 0.03
cbiO 2.48 0.00 1.39 0.03
cbiQ 3.10 0.00 1.39 0.03
glcU 2.45 0.00 1.36 0.03
llmg_1993 4.26 0.00 2.20 0.00
nha 3.86 0.00 2.23 0.00
pacL 2.00 0.00 3.16 0.00

afold change.

A higher proportion of saturated fatty acids in the cell membrane is known to result in a reduced proton permeability, which is highly important for bacteria thriving at high temperatures29. For this reason the cell membrane fatty acid composition was determined in MG1363 and TM29. A comparison of cell membrane fatty acid composition at 38 °C revealed significantly lower amounts of unsaturated fatty acids (UFA) in TM29 when compared to MG1363 (Table 4). The difference was found to be mainly due to the presence of less C18:1 (unsaturated) and more C14:0 and C16:0 (saturated) fatty acids in the mutant. The fatty acid composition was further determined for the rpoC mutant, JC030, because of its high thermal tolerance and because the pleiotropic nature of rpoC mutations in principle could affect gene expression in fatty acid metabolism27,28. Table 4 shows that the mutations in rpoC were able to alter the fatty acid composition in MG1363. Among the gene cluster involved in fatty acid metabolism, RT-qPCR analysis revealed that the mutations in rpoC caused a significant down-regulation of fabZ1 (1.5 fold, p-value = 0.000), which encodes a bifunctional dehydratase/isomerase in the fatty acid metabolism in L. lactis30,31, in the mutant, while the other genes were not affected (Fig. 7). FabZ1 catalyses the conversion of β-hydroxyl-ACP into cis-3-decenoyl-ACP, which is the precursor for elongation of unsaturated fatty acids.

Table 4. Cell membrane fatty acid composition for MG1363, TM29 and JC030 at high temperatures.

Fatty acid MG1363 TM29 JC030
Composition%
C14:0 6.4 ± 0.2 10.4 ± 0.1 11 ± 0.4
C14:1 0.8 ± 0.0 0.6 ± 0.0 0.6 ± 0.1
C16:0 19.3 ± 1.2 25.7 ± 0.4 28.1 ± 0.3
C16:1 1.3 ± 0.0 0.8 ± 0.0 0.8 ± 0.0
C16:1Δ9 2.2 ± 0.1 1.9 ± 0.0 1.9 ± 0.1
C18:0* 1.4 ± 0.3 1.5 ± 0.0 1.6 ± 0.1
C18:1 49.8 ± 0.5 44.3 ± 0.1 38.1 ± 1.4
ΔC19:0 12.5 ± 0.1 5.8 ± 0.1 9.1 ± 0.2
Unknown 6.4 ± 0.7 9.0 ± 0.7 8.9 ± 1.1
Unsaturation 54.1 ± 0.4 47.6 ± 0.2 41.4 ± 1.6

*Except C18:0, the population means of each fatty acid were significantly different at the 0.05 level, which was tested by one-way ANOVA.

Figure 7. Change in expression level of genes in the fatty acid biosynthesis cluster between the rpoC allele replaced mutant and MG1363 at 38 °C (JC030 vs. MG1363).

Figure 7

For each condition, three independent biological samples were used. The metabolism pathway was constructed based on the results from previous studies30,31. ACP, acyl carrier protein; SFA, saturated fatty acid; UFA, unsaturated fatty acid.

Discussion

In this study we successfully isolated a thermo-tolerant L. lactis mutant, TM29, using ALE. We observed in this study that a high fermentation temperature could result in faster lactate production and less formation of formate and acetate, an effect that has been observed previously8,9,32. Our results demonstrate that lactate production in L. lactis can be further improved through thermal adaptation as the growth rate is increased.

At 38 °C the mutant produced lactate 12% faster than its parent MG1363. Previous studies have suggested that additional energy requirements for maintenance and enhanced interactions between enzymes and metabolites at high temperatures, rather than self-regulation of glycolysis, could be the cause of this increased metabolic flux8,33,34. Our results are in agreement with this, as the expression of the glycolytic genes was maintained at the same level irrespective of temperature, and no mutations that could explain the increased glycolytic flux at high temperatures were revealed by genome sequencing.

Besides affecting glycolysis, a high temperature also can affect macromolecular assembling, cell membrane stability and other biological processes, which could hamper growth8,9,34. We found that growth rate and glycolysis were uncoupled at high temperatures, and a significantly reduced growth rate was found for MG1363 above 36 °C. This affected the volumetric productivity of lactate negatively, which has been observed previously35. In contrast, TM29 grew nearly twice as fast as its parent MG1363 at 38 °C, and the maximum growth temperature, the lactate flux and the end-product composition were also significantly improved. TM29 is capable of growing at 39 °C and 40 °C where growth of MG1363 ceased at 39 °C. However, pre-culturing at a lower temperature was required for TM29 to grow at 40 °C. This pre-incubation probably allows for growth and survival at a non-permissive temperature based on induction of molecular chaperones prior to the elevation of temperature12. The acquisition of this phenotype was most likely caused by the ALE, where the temperature was gradually increased.

Maintaining membrane integrity and intracellular environment is essential for normal cell functions, and the swelling that we observe for MG1363 at high temperatures (Fig. 3) combined with reduced growth and a large ATP demand clearly demonstrate that MG1363 is struggling with this. This observation can explain why a high concentrations of osmolytes improve heat tolerance36,37, since a high concentration of osmolytes would prevent swelling at high temperatures, and thus allow the cells to maintain vital functions. The ability of TM29 to maintain its cell size correlates well with the acquisition of thermal tolerance, but the mechanism involved is still unknown.

Genetically, a total of 14 single nucleotide variations (SNV) and 1 gene deletion were identified in TM29 after 860-generations of adaptation at high temperatures. This corresponds to a SNV rate of 1.63 per 100 generations which is similar to what has previously been reported for adaptations under other stress conditions (1.13 to 2.13 per 100 generations)38. A few intergenic mutations, which resulted in alteration in gene expression, were found to play important roles for the thermal tolerance in the mutant.

One interesting mutation significantly improving the thermal tolerance at 39 °C was a single-base substitution in one of the palindromic arms of the CIRCE element (TTAGTACTC-N9-GAGTGCTAA) upstream groESL, which encodes a chaperonin system. The CIRCE element, which is a negative cis-acting element that is involved in regulation of several heat shock genes via the repressor protein HrcA, is prevalent in Gram-positive bacteria39. Site-specific single-base substitution in the arms of CIRCE elements or removal of the CIRCE result in a significant up-regulation of downstream chaperone genes25,40. This is exactly what we observed in this study, where the substitution C → T (Reference position: 403714) caused a more than two-times overexpression of the genes groESL in MG1363. Chaperones are important for thermal tolerance, as they assist in refolding or degradation of the misfolded proteins that appear more frequently at high temperatures. In a thermally adapted E .coli strain, which was able to grow at 3 °C above the normal maximum, mutations caused an extreme up-regulation of GroESL (16-fold overexpression), which was central to the thermal tolerance41. However, in our study we find a more modest overexpression of GroESL, which only contributes to a part of the thermal tolerance. This difference could be the result of different regulatory mechanisms between E. coli and L. lactis, and where L. lactis relies on negative control, and E. coli uses several sigma factors that are involved in positive control mechanisms39.

In thermal adaptation, membrane transport processes are expected to be of considerable importance. L. lactis, and in particular the dairy isolates, rely heavily on various transport processes, as they are heterotrophic for various nutrients such as amino acids and vitamins42. Regulatory mutations that cause over-expression of substrate specific transporters have been reported in previous studies of L. lactis strains adapted to different environments43. We found another interesting mutation upstream the gene encoding the riboflavin transporter (ribU) that resulted in constant over-expression. The mutation was located in an uncharacterized sequence that is between the ribosome-binding site and the RFN element (FMN riboswitch) of ribU26. We found that the riboflavin biosynthesis operon was up-regulated in MG1363 at high temperatures, which could indicate riboflavin starvation (Table S3). Recently we reported44 that L. lactis starves for riboflavin at high temperatures, and that this results in an inefficient biosynthesis of FAD affecting the FAD-dependent enzymes pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) and NADH oxidase (NOX). This then impacts on fatty acid biosynthesis and causes a general oxidative stress condition that has direct consequences for L. lactis in terms of hampered growth, in particular in the absence of riboflavin. When the riboflavin transporter RibU was overexpressed in L. lactis, biosynthesis of FAD was improved, which had a positive effect on the growth at high temperatures44. By comparing the growth of MG1363 and TM29 at different temperatures with or without riboflavin in the medium we were able to confirm the important role of this compound for growth at high temperatures (Fig. 6).

We also found two mutations in rpoC, encoding the RNA polymerase β’-subunit, that rendered a significant thermal tolerance to L. lactis. When these mutations were introduced in a wild-type background, growth at 39 °C was improved just as for the groESL mutation. Large-scale alterations to gene expression profiles are usually caused by genetic changes in a few essential transcriptional regulators. Mutations in rpoC have also, for example, been observed in other ALE studies conducted on different organisms27,28, where the mutations lead to altered transcription and adaptation to the new environment. In our case we were indeed able to demonstrate that many of the differentially expressed genes in TM29 were also differentially expressed in the strain where the rpoC mutations were introduced in a wild-type background (Table 3). Among these genes arcD1 encodes the arginine/ornithine antiporter, which is involved in arginine deiminase (ADI) pathway23. Arginine is metabolized through the ADI pathway and is coupled to ATP production which could contribute to thermal tolerance by boosting the proton extrusion carried out by the F0F1—ATPase45, and it has previously been found that the ADI pathway is induced in LAB when the temperature is increased46. GlcU encodes the sole non-PTS glucose permease in L. lactis.23,47, and the up-regulation of glcU could lead to an improved uptake of glucose that is required to support the additional energy demand for maintenance at high temperatures34. Llmg_1993 encodes an amino acid transporter23, and it is known that amino acid utilization is one of the factors that limit high-temperature growth of bacteria48. Nha, pacL, cibO and cibQ encode different ion transporters23, and ion transporters are probably important for heat stress response, as they are normally induced under thermal stress conditions49,50.

Moreover, it was found that the rpoC mutant had a significantly reduced amount of UFA in the cell membrane. This could lead to growth at high temperatures without an excessive increase in membrane fluidity and loss of membrane function. The cis double bond in UFA reduces acyl-chain packing in the membrane, and thereby decrease van der Wahl-interactions between the chains and the consequence is an increase in membrane fluidity51. The amount of fatty acids with the capacity to disturb acyl-chain packing in the cell membrane is therefore regarded as one of the crucial factors for growth at high temperatures. Since membranes with a high content of these are less capable of maintaining a low ion permeability at high temperatures they are less capable of maintaining the various essential ion gradients52. In L. lactis, the involvement of fabZ1 in fatty acid desaturation was recently suggested30. Among all the gene clusters in fatty acid biosynthesis, fabZ1 was uniquely down-regulated by the mutations in rpoC (Fig. 7), which supports the observed phenotype.

The pleiotropic effects of the rpoC mutations demonstrate that RNA polymerase could serve as a potential regulatory hub, as suggested by Conrad, T. M. et al.27, in rewiring the transcription network to heat stress in L. lactis. Such regulation is not well understood in L. lactis, and to gain further understanding a global transcriptional analysis of strains with mutated rpoC in a wild-type background could be helpful.

One causal variation was found to be a large gene rearrangement, which resulted in the deletion of an operon consisting of genes from llmg_1349 to llmg_1358. Large gene rearrangements usually involve transposable elements (Insertion sequence; IS) that generate insertions and deletions through recombination between homologous elements in L. lactis during ALE53. The cause of excision in this case was two large flanking DNA repeats, which, however, most likely resulted from the sex factor promoted gene excision54. Four genes in this operon (llmg_1350-llmg_1353) encode putative tellurium resistance proteins and cAMP-binding protein CABP1, and the others encode mostly hypothetical ones. Because of the scarcity of prior researches, it is difficult to find the connection between inactivation of tellurium resistance and heat tolerance. Recently, it has been reported that mutations in the gene GdpP, encoding the c-di-AMP phosphodiesterase, render L. lactis MG1363 the ability to grow at high temperatures, which indicates the probable involvement of such a secondary messenger in stress response55.

The mutation in cdsA significantly improved the thermal tolerance as did the mutations that affected groESL and rpoC (Fig. 4). CDP diglyceride synthetase catalyzes the synthesis of CDP-diacylglycerol (CDP-DG) from cytidine triphosphate and phosphatidate in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. CDP-DG is the important intermediate at the branch point for synthesis of glycerophospholipids such as phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), and cardiolipin (CL)56. Thus, cdsA could limit the overall metabolism of head groups rather that alter the composition. It has been found that mutations in enzymes catalyzing steps after CdsA can result in both a thermally sensitive metabolism and have a general effect on growth57,58,59. Although thermal sensitivity of CdsA has not been reported, considering the central role of this enzyme in the glycerophospholipid metabolism, a thermally stable CdsA could be important for high temperature growth of L. lactis.

For the other genes, which play minor roles in the thermal tolerance, llmg_2477 and llmg_2541 encodes lysine specific permease and cation transporting ATPase, respectively. They could be involved in the aforementioned transport process for nutrients supplement and ion homeostasis. The role of TrmD, llmg_0962, llmg_0242 remains elusive due to lack of prior knowledge or unclear annotation.

In this study, we have successfully demonstrated that thermo-tolerant L. lactis mutants can be isolated through ALE. The mutant had interesting and industrially relevant properties such as improved growth rate, higher specific production rate of lactate and less formation of formate and acetate. The application of NGS and allelic replacement allowed us to identify the mutations responsible for the phenotype of the mutant at high temperatures. The mutations identified were found to influence molecular chaperones, cell membrane, and nutrient and iron transporters. None of these single mutations were able to completely reproduce the thermo-tolerant phenotype observed for the end-point mutant, which suggests that the decisive factors dictating thermal tolerance in L. lactis are multiple.

Methods

Bacterial strains and plasmids.

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S4.

Growth media and growth conditions

E. coli strains were grown aerobically in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth60. L. lactis was cultivated in chemically defined SALN medium (pH 7.0) with an additional 40 mM of MOPS44, or M1761 with 0.2% glucose. The end pH of L. lactis strain growing in the SALN medium is usually around 6.5 due to the addition of MOPS and limited amount of glucose. Growth experiments were performed in filled 300 ml glass bottles with screw caps. Optical density was measured at OD600 on a UV-1800 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu). Experiments were started at OD600 = 0.001 using overnight cultures growing exponentially at same temperatures as growth experiments. Slow magnetic stirring was used to keep the cultures homogeneous. The maximum specific growth rates (μmax) were calculated using optical density data, which were collected during exponential growth. For measurement of growth curves, overnight cultures were 1/1000 time’s diluted into fresh medium. 200 μl cultures were transferred into a honeycomb 2 plate (Oy Growth Curves Ab Ltd). Incubation and OD600 measurement were performed on a Bioscreen-C Automated Growth Curves Analysis System (Oy Growth Curves Ab Ltd). Shaking was performed prior to each measurement for keeping homogeneity.

Metabolite determination and flux calculations

The concentration of glucose, lactate, formate and acetate were determined on an Ultimate 3000 high-pressure liquid chromatography system (Dionex) equipped with an Aminex HPX-87H column (Bio-Rad) and a Shodex RI-101 detector (Showa Denko K.K.). The column oven temperature was set at 30 °C and a mobile phase of 5 mM H2SO4 with a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min was used. Samples collected during exponential growth (OD600 = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6) were analysed. For flux calculations, cell density was correlated to the corresponding cell mass of the wild-type and mutant strain at different temperatures.

Procedure for adaptive evolution

The evolution was started from Lactococcus lactis MG136318 and conducted using a serial-transfer regime. Cultures were statically incubated in test tubes in a temperature controlled water bath, and optical density was visually followed. When the culture entered the stationary phase, one ml culture was transferred into a new test tube with 9 ml fresh medium, which corresponds to 3.32-generations of growth in each tube. The procedure was also illustrated in Figure S2. The transfer frequency varied from several hours to more than one day depending on growth rate, and the number of transfers was noted down. Each week, a culture sample was saved in 25% glycerol at −80 °C in order to track the evolution. The evolution temperature was adjusted in a stepwise manner. Cells were adapted at 38 °C for 120 generations, 39 °C for 345 generations and 40 °C 395 generations. In total, cells were adapted at high temperatures for 860 generations. Culture from the final tube was streaked on a plate, one single colony was isolated, and the clone was designated as TM29.

Microarray analysis

Custom single-channel DNA microarrays for L. lactis MG1363 with probes for all annotated genes in the published sequence were designed using OligoWiz62 and chips were ordered from Agilent.

Cells were cultivated in bottles under the same condition as the growth experiment. Four independent biological samples were harvested during exponential growth (OD600 = 0.3) and mixed with 10% of an ice-cold “stop solution” (5% equilibrated phenol, pH = 7.4, in ethanol) and centrifuged at 6000 g at 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded and pellet was washed with ice-cold distilled water once and stored at −80 °C.

For RNA isolation, cells were mixed with 200 μl Solution I (0.3 M sucrose and 0.01 M NaAc, pH 4.8) and 200 μl Solution II (2% SDS and 0.01 M NaAc, pH4.8). Then, 400 μl hot phenol (equilibrated with NaAc, pH 4.8) was added into the mixture and disruption was performed using acid-washed glass beads (106 μm) (Sigma) with a FastPrep (MP Biomedicals). The lysate was centrifuged at room temperature and the water phase was extracted by phenol/NaAc twice followed by phenol/NaAc/chloroform (phenol/NaAc:chloroform = 1:1) once. RNA was precipitated by ethanol and dissolved in DEPC-treated water. The integrity of RNA was determined by a 2100 BioAnalzyer (Agilent).

cDNA synthesis, Cy3 labeling and purification were performed using a Stratagene FairPlay III Microarray Labeling Kit (Agilent) with 5 μg total RNA. A NanoDrop 1000 (Agilent) was used for quantitating cDNA. Hybridization was performed in an Agilent Hybridization Chamber (G2534A) for 17 h at 65 °C. Slides were scanned on an Agilent Microarray Scanner (G2565BA). Raw data were extracted by an Agilent Features Extraction Software according to the manufacture’s specifications.

Data processing and analysis were performed using R63 and Bioconductor64. To select differentially expressed genes, two-sample testing was performed using linear models and empirical Bayes methods from the LIMMA package65. Significantly differentially expressed genes (adjusted p-value < 0.05; fold-change >1.5) were chosen for GO analysis. GO analysis was carried out by terms of biological progress (GOTerm_BP_3, Benjamini adjusted P-Value ≤ 0.05) using DAVID66 and the total GI numbers (2434 CDSs) of L. lactis MG1363 were used as the reference. The microarray data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (Series entry: GSE27698).

RT-qPCR

First strand cDNA was synthesized from 3 μg total RNA using the Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthsis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacture’s specifications. Primers and probes (Table S5) for RT-qPCR were designed using PrimerQuest (Integrated DNA Technologies). The RT-qPCR reaction mixture contains 1X Maxima Probe/ROX qPCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 500 nM primers, 250 nm probe and 10 ng cDNA template. The pheS and alaS housekeeping genes were used as the references. For each condition, three biologically independent samples were used and the reactions were carried out in triplicate on an Mx3005P qPCR system (Agilent). Cycling conditions for all amplifications were one cycle of 95 °C for 10 min and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. For the RT-qPCR data, an average cycle threshold (CT) value was calculated from the triplicate reactions. Amplification efficiency and statistical analysis were performed using REST 200967.

Genome sequencing and mutation discovery

Genomic DNA of the mutant was purified using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) and the quality was checked by DNA electrophoresis and NanoDrop 1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) analysis. Genome sequencing was performed by Macrogen. The procedure described briefly: 2 μg genomic DNA was randomly sheared using a nebulizer (Illumina) and the ends were repaired using polynucleotide kinase and Klenow enzyme. The 5′-ends of the DNA fragments were phosphorylated and a single adenine base was added to the 3′-ends using Klenow exo+ (Illumina). Following ligation of a pair of Illumina adaptors to the repaired ends, the DNA was amplified in 10 cycles, using adaptor primers (Illumina), and fragments of around 150 bp were isolated using agarose gel electrophoresis. Sequencing libraries were quantified with a 2100 BioAnalyzer DNA 1000 chip (Agilent) as well as the Picogreen fluorescence assay (Invitrogen). Cluster generations were performed on an Illumina cluster station using 11 pmol of sequencing libraries. A total of 38 cycles of sequencing were carried out using the Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx system according to the manufacturer’s specifications. CLC Genomics Workbench was used for mapping the reads, SNP and DIP detection and identification of genomic rearrangement using the published genome sequence of L. Lactis MG136323,24 as the reference.

Allelic replacement for allele containing SNP and gene knockout

A non-replicating oroP containing integration vector was used for allelic replacement and gene knockout68. SNPs position contained homologous sequences or upstream and downstream regions of target genes for knockout were amplified from the chromosomal DNA of MG1363 and TM29 and cloned onto pCS1966 using restriction enzymes. The resulting plasmids were transformed into L. lactis and successful integrations were selected on GM17 plates using erythromycin. Counter-selection was performed on SAL (SA-medium with lipoic acid) plates containing 50 μg/ml 5-fluoroorotic acid. Successful allelic replacement or knockout was confirmed by Sanger Sequencing. The primers used in this study are listed in Table S6. Chromosomal DNA isolation, DNA manipulation and transformation for E. coli and L. lactis were performed as previously described69.

Test of thermal tolerance in serial dilutions

The serial-dilution test for thermal tolerance was conducted according to the previous report, where liquid medium was used in this study instead of agar plates55. Approximately 2E104 cells, which were from an overnight culture, were inoculated into a 1.5 ml centrifuge tube containing 500 μL medium, which results in an initial OD600 = 0.0002. A series of 10-times dilutions were carried out and resulted in tubes containing 10−1 and 10−2 times the cells in the first tube. Tubes were statically incubated at 39 °C for 48 hours. Afterwards, the tubes were centrifuged at 20,000 g for 1 min and occurrence of growth was determined by the presence of visible cell pellets. The procedure was also illustrated in Figure S3.

β-Glucuronidase activity assay

β-Glucuronidase activities were determined by the procedure described by Miller70 and modified by Israelsen et al.71, except that para-nitro-β-glucuronic acid (Biosynth AG) was used as the substrate72. The activity is given in Miller units per mg cell dry weight and calculated as described by Miller70.

Membrane fatty acid analysis

Cells were harvested during exponential growth and washed with distilled water twice. Pellets were resuspended and treated with 20 mg/ml lysozyme for 30 min at 30 °C. Cell lysis was performed in a French press (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 20,000 psi at 4 °C twice for each sample. Lipid extraction from the homogenate was based on the Bligh & Dye-procedure. Briefly 0.8 volumes of the homogenates was mixed with 1 volume CHCl3 and 2 volumes MeOH, and extracted overnight at 4 °C. Phase-separation was induced by the addition of 1 volume 0.73% NaCl (aq) and 1 volume CHCl3, and the organic phase was retrieved after mixing and centrifugation of the sample. Fatty acids were trans-methylated in borontriflouride and fatty acid composition was analyzed as earlier described73. Fatty acid methylesters (FAME) were separated on a 50-m Supelco SP-2380 column (Sigma-Aldrich) in a HP 6890 gas chromatograph (GC), in split mode using He as carrier gas. GC settings were: injector temperature 250 °C, split ratio 20:1, carrier flow 1.2 mL/min, detector temperature 270 °C, air flow in detector 400 mL/min, hydrogen flow 30 mL/min. FAME were separated using a temperature program starting at 50 °C and rising to 140 °C at 30 °C/min; this temperature was kept for 2 min, hereafter the temperature was raised to 220 °C at 2 °C/min and the oven was kept at 220 °C for 5 min before the temperature was raised to 250 °C at 10 °C/min. The final temperature was kept for 17 min. FAME were identified using authentic standards (Nu-Check Prep).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Chen, J. et al. Adaptation of Lactococcus lactis to high growth temperature leads to a dramatic increase in acidification rate. Sci. Rep. 5, 14199; doi: 10.1038/srep14199 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep14199-s1.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank Jannie Felskov Agersten for her expertise in the extraction of fatty acids. This work was supported by the grant NNF12OC0000818 from the Novo Nordisk Foundation.

Footnotes

Author Contributions J.C., P.R.J. and C.S. conceived and designed the experiments. J.C. and J.S. performed the experiments. J.C., J.S. and L.H. analyzed the data. J.C. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to data interpretation, reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final version.

References

  1. Leroy F. & De Vuyst L. Lactic acid bacteria as functional starter cultures for the food fermentation industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 15, 67–78 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  2. Teuber M. in The Genera of Lactic Acid Bacteria Vol. 2 The Lactic Acid Bacteria (eds Wood B. J. B. & Holzapfel W. H. ) Ch. 6, 173–234 (Springer: US, , 1995). [Google Scholar]
  3. Robinson K., Chamberlain L. M., Schofield K. M., Wells J. M. & Le Page R. W. F. Oral vaccination of mice against tetanus with recombinant Lactococcus lactis. Nat Biotech 15, 653–657 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hugenholtz J. et al. Lactococcus lactis as a cell factory for high-level diacetyl production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 4112–4114 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gaspar P., Neves A. R., Gasson M. J., Shearman C. A. & Santos H. High yields of 2,3-butanediol and mannitol in Lactococcus lactis through engineering of NAD+ cofactor recycling. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 6826–6835 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Solem C., Dehli T. & Jensen P. R. Rewiring Lactococcus lactis for ethanol production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 2512–2518 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Budde-Niekiel A., Geis A., Hassan M. & Heller K. Method of improving food fermentation procedures. US patent 20050158423 filed 11 Mar. 2003, and issued 21 Jul. 2005.
  8. Hofvendahl K., van Niel E. W. J. & Hahn-Hägerdal B. Effect of temperature and pH on growth and product formation of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis ATCC 19435 growing on maltose. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 51, 669–672 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  9. Adamberg K., Kask S., Laht T. M. & Paalme T. The effect of temperature and pH on the growth of lactic acid bacteria: a pH-auxostat study. Int J Food Microbiol 85, 171–183 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Georgopoulos C. & Welch W. J. Role of the major heat shock proteins as molecular chaperones. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 9, 601–634 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Török Z. et al. Evidence for a lipochaperonin: association of active proteinfolding GroESL oligomers with lipids can stabilize membranes under heat shock conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 2192 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Desmond C., Fitzgerald G. F., Stanton C. & Ross R. P. Improved stress tolerance of GroESL-overproducing Lactococcus lactis and probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 5929–5936 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Abdullah-Al-Mahin Sugimoto, S., Higashi C., Matsumoto S. & Sonomoto K. Improvement of multiple-stress tolerance and lactic acid production in Lactococcus lactis NZ9000 under conditions of thermal stress by heterologous expression of Escherichia coli dnaK. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 4277–4285 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Conrad T. M., Lewis N. E. & Palsson B. Ø. Microbial laboratory evolution in the era of genome-scale science. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, Article number 509 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Renault P. Genetically modified lactic acid bacteria: applications to food or health and risk assessment. Biochimie 84, 1073–1087 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sandberg T. E. et al. Evolution of Escherichia coli to 42 °C and subsequent genetic engineering reveals adaptive mechanisms and novel mutations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 2647–2662 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Caspeta L. et al. Altered sterol composition renders yeast thermotolerant. Science 346, 75–78 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gasson M. J. Plasmid complements of Streptococcus lactis NCDO 712 and other lactic streptococci after protoplast-induced curing. J. Bacteriol. 154, 1–9 (1983). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ingmer H., Vogensen F. K., Hammer K. & Kilstrup M. Disruption and analysis of the clpB, clpC, and clpE genes in Lactococcus lactis: ClpE, a new Clp family in gram-positive bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 181, 2075–2083 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kilstrup M., Jacobsen S., Hammer K. & Vogensen F. K. Induction of heat shock proteins DnaK, GroEL, and GroES by salt stress in Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 1826–1837 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Burgess C., O’Connell-Motherway M., Sybesma W., Hugenholtz J. & van Sinderen D. Riboflavin production in Lactococcus lactis: potential for in situ production of vitamin-enriched foods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 5769–5777 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Da Wei Huang B. T. S. & Lempicki R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wegmann U. et al. Complete genome sequence of the prototype lactic acid bacterium Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363. J. Bacteriol. 189, 3256–3270 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Linares D. M., Kok J. & Poolman B. Genome sequences of Lactococcus lactis MG1363 (revised) and NZ9000 and comparative physiological studies. J. Bacteriol. 192, 5806–5812 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zuber U. & Schumann W. CIRCE, a novel heat shock element involved in regulation of heat shock operon dnaK of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 176, 1359–1363 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Burgess C. M. et al. The riboflavin transporter RibU in Lactococcus lactis: molecular characterization of gene expression and the transport mechanism. J. Bacteriol. 188, 2752–2760 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Conrad T. M. et al. RNA polymerase mutants found through adaptive evolution reprogram Escherichia coli for optimal growth in minimal media. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 20500–20505 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee Y. H., Nam K. H. & Helmann J. D. A mutation of the RNA polymerase β′ subunit (rpoC) confers cephalosporin resistance in Bacillus subtilis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 56–65 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sajbidor J. Effect of some environmental factors on the content and composition of microbial membrane lipids. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 17, 87–103 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Eckhardt T. H., Skotnicka D., Kok J. & Kuipers O. P. Transcriptional regulation of fatty acid biosynthesis in Lactococcus lactis. J. Bacteriol. 195, 1081–1089 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lu Y.-J., White S. W. & Rock C. O. Domain swapping between Enterococcus faecalis FabN and FabZ proteins localizes the structural determinants for isomerase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 30342–30348 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Franks P., Hall R. & Linklater P. Mechanistic model of the growth of Streptococcus cremoris HP at super optimal temperatures. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 22, 1465–1487 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  33. Ben-Zvi A. P. & Goloubinoff P. Review: mechanisms of disaggregation and refolding of stable protein aggregates by molecular chaperones. J. Struct. Biol. 135, 84–93 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Postmus J. et al. Quantitative analysis of the high temperature-induced glycolytic flux increase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals dominant metabolic regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 23524–23532 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hofvendahl K. & Hahn–Hägerdal B. Factors affecting the fermentative lactic acid production from renewable resources. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 26, 87–107 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gibson B. The effect of high sugar concentrations on the heat resistance of vegetative micro-organisms. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 36, 365–376 (1973). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kilstrup M. & Hammer K. Short communication: salt extends the upper temperature limit for growth of Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris on solid M17 medium. J. Dairy Sci. 83, 1448–1450 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Dettman J. R. et al. Evolutionary insight from whole-genome sequencing of experimentally evolved microbes. Mol. Ecol. 21, 2058–2077 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Narberhaus F. Negative regulation of bacterial heat shock genes. Mol. Microbiol. 31, 1–8 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yuan G. & Wong S. Regulation of groE expression in Bacillus subtilis: the involvement of the sigma A-like promoter and the roles of the inverted repeat sequence (CIRCE). J. Bacteriol. 177, 5427–5433 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rudolph B., Gebendorfer K. M., Buchner J. & Winter J. Evolution of Escherichia coli for growth at high temperatures. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 19029–19034 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Jensen P. R. & Hammer K. Minimal requirements for exponential growth of Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 4363–4366 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Bachmann H., Starrenburg M. J., Molenaar D., Kleerebezem M. & van Hylckama Vlieg J. E. Microbial domestication signatures of Lactococcus lactis can be reproduced by experimental evolution. Genome Res. 22, 115–124 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Chen J., Shen J., Solem C. & Jensen P. R. Oxidative stress at high temperatures in Lactococcus lactis due to an insufficient supply of riboflavin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 6140–6147 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang J., Wu C., Xue F., Du G. & Chen J. in Stress Responses of Lactic Acid Bacteria Vol. 11 Food Microbiology and Food Safety (eds Tsakalidou Effie & Papadimitriou Konstantinos ) Ch. 10, 199–218 (Springer: US, , 2011). [Google Scholar]
  46. Vrancken G., Rimaux T., Wouters D., Leroy F. & De Vuyst L. The arginine deiminase pathway of Lactobacillus fermentum IMDO 130101 responds to growth under stress conditions of both temperature and salt. Food Microbiol. 26, 720–727 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Castro R. et al. Characterization of the individual glucose uptake systems of Lactococcus lactis: mannose-PTS, cellobiose-PTS and the novel GlcU permease. Mol. Microbiol. 71, 795–806 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ron E. Z. & Davis B. D. Growth rate of Escherichia coli at elevated temperatures - limitation by methionine. J. Bacteriol. 107, 391–396 (1971). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Richmond C. S., Glasner J. D., Mau R., Jin H. & Blattner F. R. Genome-wide expression profiling in Escherichia coli K-12. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 3821–3835 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Gao H. et al. Global transcriptome analysis of the heat shock response of Shewanella oneidensis. J. Bacteriol. 186, 7796–7803 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Fulco A. J. Fatty acid metabolism in bacteria. Prog. Lipid Res. 22, 133–160 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Van de Vossenberg J., Ubbink-Kok T., Elferink M., Driessen A. & Konings W. Ion permeability of the cytoplasmic membrane limits the maximum growth temperature of bacteria and archaea. Mol. Microbiol. 18, 925–932 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. de Visser J. A. G. M., Akkermans A. D. L., Hoekstra R. F. & de Vos W. M. Insertion-sequence-mediated mutations isolated during adaptation to growth and starvation in Lactococcus lactis. Genetics 168, 1145–1157 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Gasson M. J., Swindell S., Maeda S. & Dodd H. M. Molecular rearrangement of lactose plasmid DNA associated with high-frequency transfer and cell aggregation in Lactococcus Iactis 712. Mol. Microbiol. 6, 3213–3223 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Smith W. M. et al. Heat resistance and salt hypersensitivity in Lactococcus lactis due to spontaneous mutation of llmg_1816 (gdpP) induced by high-temperature growth. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 7753–7759 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Raetz C. R. Isolation of Escherichia coli mutants defective in enzymes of membrane lipid synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 2274–2278 (1975). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ota A., Shibuya I., Maruo B., Ishinaga M. & Kito M. An extremely labile phosphatidylserine synthetase of an Escherichia coli mutant with the temperature-sensitive formation of phosphatidylethanolamine. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 348, 449 (1974). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Nishijima M. & Raetz C. R. Membrane lipid biogenesis in Escherichia coli: identification of genetic loci for phosphatidylglycerophosphate synthetase and construction of mutants lacking phosphatidylglycerol. J. Biol. Chem. 254, 7837–7844 (1979). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Lindgren V., Holmgren E. & Rutberg L. Bacillus subtilis mutant with temperature-sensitive net synthesis of phosphatidylethanolamine. J. Bacteriol. 132, 473–484 (1977). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Sambrook J. & Russell D. in Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual Vol. 3 (eds Argentine Jan & Irwin Nina ) Ch. Appendices, A2.2–A2.12 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2001). [Google Scholar]
  61. Terzaghi B. E. & Sandine W. Improved medium for lactic streptococci and their bacteriophages. Appl. Microbiol. 29, 807–813 (1975). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wernersson R., Juncker A. S. & Nielsen H. B. Probe selection for DNA microarrays using OligoWiz. Nat. Protocols 2, 2677–2691 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. The R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2013) Available at: http://www.R-project.org/. (Accessed: 15/05/2013).
  64. Gentleman R. et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 5, R80 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Smyth G. in Bioinformatics and computational biology solutions using R and Bioconductor Vol. V Statistics for Biology and Health (eds Gentleman Robert et al. ) Ch. 23, 397–420 (Springer: New York, , 2005). [Google Scholar]
  66. Dennis G. et al. DAVID: database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery. Genome Biol. 4, P3 (2003). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Pfaffl M. W., Horgan G. W. & Dempfle L. Relative expression software tool (REST©) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, e36 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Solem C., Defoor E., Jensen P. R. & Martinussen J. Plasmid pCS1966, a new selection/counterselection tool for lactic acid bacterium strain construction based on the oroP gene, encoding an orotate transporter from Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 4772–4775 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Solem C., Koebmann B. J. & Jensen P. R. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase has no control over glycolytic flux in Lactococcus lactis MG1363. J. Bacteriol. 185, 1564–1571 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Miller J. H. in Experiments in molecular genetics 352–355 (CSH Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1972). [Google Scholar]
  71. Israelsen H., Madsen S. M., Vrang A., Hansen E. B. & Johansen E. Cloning and partial characterization of regulated promoters from Lactococcus lactis Tn917-lacZ integrants with the new promoter probe vector, pAK80. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 2540–2547 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Platteeuw C., Simons G. & de Vos W. M. Use of the Escherichia coli beta-glucuronidase (gusA) gene as a reporter gene for analyzing promoters in lactic acid bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 587–593 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Drachmann T., Mathiessen J. H., Pedersen M. H. & Hellgren L. I. The source of dietary fatty acids alters the activity of secretory sphingomyelinase in the rat. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 109, 1003–1009 (2007). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep14199-s1.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES