Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Sep 24;5:14423. doi: 10.1038/srep14423

Dirac and Weyl Semimetal in XYBi (X = Ba, Eu; Y = Cu, Ag and Au)

Yongping Du 1, Bo Wan 1, Di Wang 1, Li Sheng 1,2, Chun-Gang Duan 3, Xiangang Wan 1,2,a
PMCID: PMC4585842  PMID: 26399742

Abstract

Weyl and Dirac semimetals recently stimulate intense research activities due to their novel properties. Combining first-principles calculations and effective model analysis, we predict that nonmagnetic compounds BaYBi (Y = Au, Ag and Cu) are Dirac semimetals. As for the magnetic compound EuYBi, although the time reversal symmetry is broken, their long-range magnetic ordering cannot split the Dirac point into pairs of Weyl points. However, we propose that partially substitute Eu ions by Ba ions will realize the Weyl semimetal.


Following the discovery of topological insulator (TI)1,2, there has been considerable research interest in studying the Weyl semimetal (WSM), the first metallic topologically nontrivial matter3,4,5,6. In WSM, non-degenerate valence and conduction bands touch at an accidental degeneracy point in a three-dimensional (3D) Brillouin zone, and its low energy physics is approximated by the Weyl equation3,4. Weyl points, the nondegenerate linear touchings of the bulk bands, always come in pair, and they are robust due to the protection by the topology of the band structure. The most remarkable feature of WSM is the Fermi arc surface states3. Several compounds, including pyrochlore iridates3, TI based heterostructures7, HgCr2Se48 and many other systems9,10,11,12,13 had been theoretically predicted as promising WSMs. The indication about realization of WSM have been reported14,15,16. Very recently, the noncentrosymmetric and nonmagnetic transition-metal monophosphide are predicted as WSM17,18 and the Fermi arc, as the smoking-gun feature, has been confirmed experimentally19,20,21,22,23.

Same as the WSM, the Dirac semimetal (DSM) is also a 3D analog of graphene24,25,26,27. But in contrast with Weyl point, the Dirac point has four-fold degeneracy, and does not possess a topological number, consequently the Dirac point is not robust against the external perturbations and usually hard to be realized. Thus the 3D DSM receive much less attention until the discovery of Na3Bi28 and Cd3As229. Wang et al. find that there is a paired 3D bulk Dirac points exist on the kz axis of Na3Bi28 and Cd3As229, and these Dirac points are protected by the crystal symmetry thus are stable28,29. The theoretical prediction of DSM in Na3Bi and Cd3As228,29 had been quickly confirmed by the subsequent photoemission measurement30,31,32,33. This immmediately triggers a new wave of research to explore the unique properties associated with the 3D Dirac points in the DSM30,31,32,33,34,35,36. Unfortunately, Na3Bi is not stable in air while arsenic limits the application of Cd3As2. Therefore searching new 3D DSM that is stable in nature and less toxic is of both fundamental and technological importance.

In this paper, based on the density functional theory (DFT) calculations and effective low energy models, we predict that BaYBi (Y = Au, Ag and Cu) are promising 3D Dirac materials. For BaAuBi, the nontrivial topology is due to the band inversion of the Bi-p bonding and antibonding states, while for the BaAgBi and BaCuBi, the band inversion happens between the Ag/Cu s and Bi p orbital. Protected by the C3 rotation symmetry, the Dirac points locate along the Γ − A line. The magnetic configuration in EuYBi indeed break the time reversal symmetry, however cannot split the Dirac point into two Weyl points. We propose that partially substituting Eu by Ba, i.e. alloy compound EuxBa(1−x)Ag(Au)Bi, which could be grown using molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) technique, is a promising way to realize the WSM.

Results and Discussion

BaYBi (Y = Au, Ag, Cu) crystallize in the same hexagonal ZrBeSi type structure with space group Inline graphic37. The crystal structure of BaAuBi is shown as an example in Fig. 1, in which Au and Bi ions form honeycomb lattice layers stacking along c axis and sandwiched by trigonal layers formed by Ba atoms. There are two formula units in the primitive unit cell, and the six atoms in the unit cell locate at three nonequivalent crystallographic sites: Ba atoms occupy the 2a Inline graphic, while Au and Bi reside on the 2c Inline graphic and 2d Inline graphic sites respectively37. There is no free internal coordinates, and the lattice constants are the only structural parameter for BaYBi lattice. We optimize the lattice parameter and for all of the three compounds, our numerical lattice constants are in good agreements with experiments, and the small discrepancy between the numerical and experimental structure has negligible effect on the electronic structure. Hence, the following results are obtained based on the experimental structure, unless stated specifically.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Crystal structure of BaAuBi. BaAgBi and BaCuBi have similar structure. (b) Brillouin zone of bulk and the projected surface Brillouin zones of (001) and (010) planes.

We first calculate the electronic structure of BaAuBi, and show the results in Fig. 2(a). The Ba in BaAuBi is highly ionic, has negligible contribution to the states around Fermi level. Au-6s and 5d bands mainly located at −4 to −1 eV, and −6 to −4 eV, respectively. The Bi-6s is basically located about −11 eV below the Fermi level. The valence and conduction bands are dominated by the Bi-6p bonding and antibonding states. Checking the wave function, we find that at the Γ point the Bi-6p antibonding state is higher than the Bi-6p bonding state, however at the A point, the odd-parity state is about 0.545 eV lower in energy than even-parity state.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Electronic structure of BaAuBi. Green and red line highlights the different irreducible representation along Γ − A line. (b) Band evolution near Fermi energy of BaAuBi at Γ point, red dashed line stands for the Fermi energy (see main text for detailed description).

In order to understand the mechanism of the band inversion, we illustrate the band evolution at the Γ point of BaAuBi in Fig. 2(b). As discussed above, the states near Fermi level are primarily contributed by the Bi-6p orbital, with also the Au-6s state. Since the two Bi atoms (Bi and Bi′) in the unit cell are related to each other by the inversion symmetry, similar with ref. 38,39, we combine the Bi-6p orbitals to form the hybridized states and label the bonding and antibonding states as Inline graphic and Inline graphic respectively, where the superscripts +/− denote the parity of the corresponding states. According to the point group symmetry, the pz orbital split from the px and py orbitals while the latter two are still degenerate as shown in the Fig. 2(b). Finally, we consider the effect of SOC. The Inline graphic and Inline graphic states are pushed up by the SOC, while the Inline graphic Inline graphic will mix with Inline graphic Inline graphic, consequently the bonding Inline graphic and Inline graphic and antibonding states Inline graphic and Inline graphic are close to each other at the Γ point, and the band inversion occurs at the A point as shown in Fig. 2.

Along Γ − A line the C3 symmetry is preserved, by the symmetry analysis the two relevant bands along this line belong to different representations (Δ7 and Δ8 as shown in Fig. 2(a). See Additional Data for the detail). Thus the hybridization between these bands is strictly forbidden, which results in the protected band crossing as shown in Fig. 2(a). The linear band dispersions associated with Dirac points near the Fermi surface will contribute a high-field unsaturated linear magnetoresistance40,41, we thus believe such novel properties may also be observed in BaAuBi, although the Dirac point is located slightly below the Fermi level as shown in Fig. 2(a).

Since the topological nature is determined by the Δ7 and Δ8 bands, based on the projection-operator method (see Additional Data), we build the effective Hamiltonian by using the four relevant states as basis vectors (in the order of Inline graphic at Γ point. We neglect all of other states, since they are far from the Fermi level and do not involve into the band inversion, and the Hamiltonian can be written as:

graphic file with name srep14423-m18.jpg

where Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic Inline graphic and k± = kx ± iky. The parameters in the above formula are material dependent, and by fitting the DFT calculated band dispersion, we obtain C0 = −0.06978 eV, C1 = −0.34038 eV ⋅ å2, C2 = 2.25 eV ⋅ å2, M0 = −0.21537 eV, M1 = −1.9523 eV ⋅ å2, M2 = −7.9507 eV ⋅ å2, and A0 = 1.3668 eV ⋅ å. Solving the above eigenvalue problem, we obtain Inline graphic, and at Inline graphic, we get the gapless solutions. In the vicinity of kc and neglect the high-order terms, E(k′) would be equal to Inline graphic (δkx,y,z are small displacement from kc), which is a linear dispersion and suggests in neighbourhood of kc, our effective Hamiltonian is nothing but 3D anisotropic massless Dirac fermions. A 3D Dirac semimetal state can also be realized at the critical point of the topological phase transition between a band insulator and a 3D topological insulator42,43. Different from this case, the Dirac points in BaAuBi are protected by the C3 rotation symmetry, thus very robust.

We also investigate the BaAgBi and BaCuBi. The electronic properties of BaCuBi are very similar with that of BaAgBi, we thus only report results of BaAgBi. As shown in Fig. 3(b), significantly different with the Au-6s state in BaAuBi, the Ag-5s orbit in BaAgBi is higher in energy than Bi-6p state, consequently the states closed to the Fermi level become Inline graphic and Inline graphic. Similar with the case in Na3Bi28, due to the strong SOC of Bi-6p, the Inline graphic and Inline graphic states will be pushed up, which result in the band inversion at Γ point. This inversion is confirmed by our DFT calculation, as shown in Fig. 3(a), at the Γ point, the Inline graphic is higher than Inline graphic by about 0.34 eV. Along Γ − A line, these two bands belongs to different representations (Δ7 and Δ8), thus there is also a unavoidable crossing point located at Γ − A line. It is also easy to prove that the band dispersion is linear around the band touching points. Thus, the crossing points are the Dirac points.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Electronic structure of BaAgBi, Green and red line highlights the different irreducible representation along Γ − A line. (b) Band evolution around Fermi energy of BaAgBi at Γ point, red dashed line stands for the Fermi energy.

The Dirac points in BaAgBi are doubly degenerate due to inversion and time-reversal symmetries, and upon breaking the time reversal symmetry3 or inversion symmetry42,43 a Dirac cone will split into two Weyl nodes separated in momentum space. This family of intermetallic compound with hexagonal structure indeed has several members with magnetic ion Eu: EuXY (X = Cu, Au, Ag; Y = As, Sb, Bi)37,44,45. Experiments confirm that some of them indeed possess long-range magnetic configuration44. Unfortunately, the Eu2+ spins align ferromagnetically with the ab plane, but antiferromagnetically along the c-axis45, therefore the exchange field is exactly cancelled at the XY-plane of EuXY. Thus breaking the time reversal symmetry by this type of antiferromagnetic configuration cannot split the Dirac points, and the compounds of EuXY have no chance to become WSM.

We, however, expect that substituting part of Eu ions by Ba ions, the two antiferromagnetically coupled Eu plane in EuxBa1−xAgBi may not exactly cancel each other, and then there is a chance the compound becomes WSM. To confirm this expectation, we then performed another calculation on Eu0.5Ba0.5AgBi, in which we replace one of the two antiferromagnetically coupled Eu plane in the unit cell by Ba. According to our calculation, the c axis is the magnetic easy axis, this magnetization does not break the C3 rotation symmetry, consequently as shown in Fig. 4(a), the Dirac point indeed splits into two Weyl points as marked by red circle. There is also two other Weyl points slightly above/below the Weyl nodes marked by red circle. The Weyl nodes are very close to the Fermi energy as shown in Fig. 4(a), thus, the phenomena associated with the chiral anomaly46,47,48 also exist in Eu0.5Ba0.5AgBi. Fig. 4(b) shows the Fermi arcs which connect projected bulk Weyl points of opposite chirality. Thus we believe to grow it by the cutting edge film growth technique like MBE and to explore the possible WSM are a very interesting topic.

Figure 4. Band structure and surface state of Eu0.5Ba0.5AgBi.

Figure 4

(a) Calculated band structure of Eu0.5Ba0.5AgBi.(b)The sketch of the Fermi arcs connecting projected bulk Weyl points of opposite chirality. The blue and red dots denote the Weyl points with opposite chirality.

In summary, based on density-functional calculation and effective model analysis, we propose that the BaYBi (Y = Au, Ag and Cu) are 3D Dirac semimetals. The nontrivial topological feature is due to p-p inversion for BaAuBi and s-p band inversion for BaAgBi and BaCuBi, and their Dirac points are protected by the C3 rotation symmetry and thus are very robust. Their magnetic cousins, i.e EuYBi (Y = Au, Ag and Cu) are not Weyl semimetals. However, partial substitution of Eu with Ba ions in EuYBi could result in the Weyl semimetal. Furthermore, our numerical calculation also confirm that a uniaxial strain along a-axis, which breaks the C3 rotation symmetry, will drive BaAgBi into topological insulator.

Note. When finalizing our work, we became aware of a recent study by Borisenko et al.49, in which the authors also predict BaAgBi is a possible 3D DSM, agreeing with our conclusion.

Methods

The electronic band structure calculations have been carried out using the full potential linearized augmented plane wave method as implemented in WIEN2K package50. The modified Becke-Johnson exchange potential together with local-density approximation for the correlation potential (MBJLDA) has been used here to obtain accurate band inversion strength and band order51. A 16 × 16 × 7 mesh is used for the Brillouin zone integral. Using the second-order variational procedure, we include the spin-orbital coupling (SOC) interaction.

The tight-binding model has been established by using Slater-Koster method52. 5 s orbit of Ag atom and three 6p orbits of Bi atom are taken as basis. The tight-binding model has been used to simulate the bulk band structure with Weyl points as found by our LSDA + SO + U calculation. To calculate the surface state and Fermi arc, we build the (010) slab of a thickness of 85 unit-cells.

Additional Data

Effective Hamiltonian for BaAuBi

The conduction and valence bands of BaAuBi are mainly contributed by four states: Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic, we thus use these states as the basis to build the effective model Hamiltonian at the Γ point of BZ. As a 4 × 4 hermitian matrix, the effective Hamiltonian can be written as Inline graphic, where I is the 4 × 4 identity matrix, Γi and Γij are Dirac matrices, ε(k), di(k), and dij(k) are function of momentum k.

The Hamiltonian should be invariant under the operation of crystal symmtery and time reversal symmtery. This requires the function di(k) [dij(k)] and the associated Γiij] matrices belong to the same irreducible representation. Thus the key problem is to determine the irreducible representation for di(k) [dij(k)] and Γ matrices, which can be done by the projection-operator method.

The Dirac Γ matrices can be written as Γ1 = σ1 ⊗ τ1, Γ2 = σ2 ⊗ τ1, Γ3 = σ3 ⊗ τ1, Γ4 = σ0 ⊗ τ2, Γ5 = σ0 ⊗ τ3, and Γab = [Γa, Γb]/2i39. The projection operator is defined as Inline graphic, where g is the group order, li is the dimension of the ith representation, R denotes the group element i.e. the symmetry operation, χi(R) represent the character of group element R in ith representation, PR is the operator of group element R.

The double group of Inline graphic has 18 classes, and their irreducible representations are denoted as R1 to R1853, and its character table can be found in ref. 45. Based on the basis mentioned above, one can easily work out the transformation matrix DR for symmetry operator PR, which allow us to apply the projection operator pi on Inline graphic, consequently determine the irreducible representation of Γa. Using the same process, one can also determine the irreducible representation for the polynomials of k up to O(k3). We present the irreducible representation of Dirac Γ matrices and polynomials of k, and their transformation under time reversal in Table 1.

Table 1. The character table of Dirac Γ matrices and the polynomials of the momentum k for BaAuBi.

Γ matrices representation T
Γ0, Γ5 R1 +
1, Γ2} R14 +
3, Γ4} R15 +
Γ12, Γ34 R2
Γ14 + Γ23 R3
Γ13 − Γ24 R4
13 + Γ24, Γ14 − Γ23} R6
15, Γ25} R14
35, Γ45} R15
d(k) representation T
C, Inline graphic, Inline graphic R1 +
Inline graphic R14
Inline graphic R15
kz, Inline graphic, Inline graphic R11
Inline graphic R +
{kxkz, kykz} R6 +
Inline graphic R
Inline graphic R

With the Table 1, the effective model Hamiltonian of BaAuBi can be easily expressed as: Inline graphic, where Inline graphicInline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic.

Effective Hamiltonian for BaAgBi

For BaAgBi, the conduction bands are Ag-5s states, while the valence bands are Bi-6p states, thus the four basis become Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic. We list the character table of Γ matrices and the function d(k) (expanded as polynomials of the momentum k) and their transformation under time reversal in Table 2. Based on Table 2, one can get the effective model Hamiltonian for BaAgBi: Inline graphic, where Inline graphicInline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic.

Table 2. The character table of Dirac matrices and the function d(k) of BaAgBi.

Γ matrices representation T
Γ0, Γ5 R1 +
1, Γ2} R14
3, Γ4} R15
Γ12, Γ34 R2
Γ14 − Γ23 R3
Γ13 + Γ24 R4
13 − Γ24, Γ14 + Γ23} R6
15, Γ25} R14 +
35, Γ45} R15 +
d(k) representation T
C, Inline graphic, Inline graphic R +
Inline graphic R14
Inline graphic R15
kz, Inline graphic, Inline graphic R
Inline graphic R5 +
{kxkz, kykz} R6 +
Inline graphic R12
Inline graphic R

Band representation

At the Γ point of BZ, each state should belong to an irreducible representation of the double group of Inline graphic Again, applying the projection operator onto the conduction and valence states of BaAuBi, we find that Inline graphic and Inline graphic belong to representation Inline graphic, while Inline graphic and Inline graphic belong to representation Inline graphic, which had been marked in Fig. 2(a). Different from Γ point, the symmetry of Γ − A line is Inline graphic. We show the compatibility relations between the double group of Inline graphic and Inline graphic in Table 3. It is clear that the representation Inline graphic and Inline graphic, evolute to Δ7 and Δ8, respectively.

Table 3. The compatibility relations between the double group of Inline graphic and Inline graphic .

Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
Inline graphic Δ7 Δ8 Δ9 Δ7 Δ8 Δ9

For BaAgBi, the valence/conduction states at the Γ point of BZ belong Inline graphic, and will change to Δ8 and Δ7 along Γ − A line according to Table 3.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Du, Y. et al. Dirac and Weyl Semimetal in XYBi (X=Ba, Eu; Y=Cu, Ag and Au). Sci. Rep. 5, 14423; doi: 10.1038/srep14423 (2015).

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the National Key Project for Basic Research of China (Grants No. 2011CB922101, 2014CB921104), NSFC under Grants No. 91122035, 11174124, 11374137 and 61125403. The project is also funded by Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions. Supported by the program B for Outstanding PhD candidate of Nanjing University.

Footnotes

Author Contributions X.W. notices the Dirac point in these systems. Y.D. and B.W. perform the first principle calculation. Y.D. and D.W. did the symmetry analysis and the model. X.W. interpret the numerical results and write the paper. All authors contribute to editing the manuscript.

References

  1. Hasan M. Z. & Kane C. L. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  2. Qi X. L. & Zhang S.-C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  3. Wan X., Turner A. M., Vishwanath A. & Savrasov S. Y. Topological semimetal and Fermi-arc surface states in the electronic structure of pyrochlore iridates. Phys. Rev. B 83, 205101 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  4. Balents L. Weyl electrons kiss. Physics 4, 36 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  5. Ando Y. Topological Insulator Materials. J. Phys. Soc. of Jpn. 82, 102001 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  6. Yang K.-Y., Lu Y.-M. & Ran Y. Quantum Hall effects in a Weyl semimetal: Possible application in pyrochlore iridates. Phys. Rev. B 84, 075129 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  7. Burkov A. A. & Balents L. Weyl Semimetal in a Topological Insulator Multilayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 127205 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Xu G., Weng H. M., Wang Z., Dai X. & Fang Z. Chern Semimetal and the Quantized Anomalous Hall Effect in HgCr2Se4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 186806 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bulmash D., Liu C.-X. & Qi X.-L. Prediction of a Weyl semimetal in Hg1−x−yCdxMnyTe. Phys. Rev. B 89, 081106 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  10. Halász G. & Balents L. Time-reversal invariant realization of the Weyl semimetal phase. Phys. Rev. B 85, 035103 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu J. & Vanderbilt D. Weyl semimetals from noncentrosymmetric topological insulators. Phys. Rev. B 90, 155316 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  12. Wan X., Vishwanath A. & Savrasov S. Y. Computational Design of Axion Insulators Based on 5d Spinel Compounds. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 146601 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mañes J. L. Existence of bulk chiral fermions and crystal symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 85, 155118 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  14. Ueda K. et al. Variation of Charge Dynamics in the Course of Metal-Insulator Transition for Pyrochlore-Type Nd2Ir2O7 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 136402 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chu J.-H. et al. Linear magnetoresistance and time reversal symmetry breaking of pyrochlore iridates Bi2Ir2O7. arXiv:1309.4750 (2013).
  16. Kim H.-J. et al. Dirac versus Weyl Fermions in Topological Insulators: Adler-Bell-Jackiw Anomaly in Transport Phenomena. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 246603 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Weng H. M., Fang C., Fang Z., Bernevig B. A. & Dai X. Weyl Semimetal Phase in Noncentrosymmetric Transition-Metal Monophosphides. Phys. Rev. X. 5, 011029 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang S. M. et al. A Weyl Fermion semimetal with surface Fermi arcs in the transition metal monopnictide TaAs class. Nature Comm. 6, 7373 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Xu S. Y. et al. Discovery of Weyl semimetal NbAs. arXiv: 1504.01350
  20. Xu S. Y. et al. Discovery of a Weyl Fermion semimetal and topological Fermi arcs. Science 10.1126/science.aaa9297 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lv B. Q. et al. Observation of Weyl nodes in TaAs. arXiv: 1503.09188
  22. Xu N. et al. Observation of Weyl nodes and Fermi arcs in TaP. arXiv: 1507.03983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  23. Lv B. Q. et al. Experimental Discovery of Weyl Semimetal TaAs. Phys. Rev. X. 5, 031013 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  24. Young S. et al. Dirac Semimetal in Three Dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 140405 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Singh B. et al. Topological electronic structure andWeyl semimetal in the TlBiSe2 class of semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 86, 115208 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  26. Steinberg J. A. et al. Bulk Dirac Points in Distorted Spinels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 036403 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Yang B. J. & Nagaosa N. Classification of stable three-dimensional Dirac semimetals with nontrivial topology. Nature Comm. 5, 4898 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang Z. et al. Dirac semimetal and topological phase transitions in A3Bi (A = Na, K, Rb). Phys. Rev. B 85, 195320 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang Z., Weng H. M., Wu Q., Dai X. & Fang Z. Three-dimensional Dirac semimetal and quantum transport in Cd3As2. Phys. Rev. B 88, 125427 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu Z. K. et al. Discovery of a Three-Dimensional Topological Dirac Semimetal, Na3Bi. Science 343, 864 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Xu S.-Y. et al. Observation of a bulk 3D Dirac multiplet, Lifshitz transition, and nestled spin states in Na3Bi. arXiv:1312.7624 (2013).
  32. Borisenko S. et al. Experimental Realization of a Three-Dimensional Dirac Semimetal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 027603 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Neupane M. et al. Observation of a three-dimensional topological Dirac semimetal phase in high-mobility Cd3As2. Nature Comm. 5, 3786 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. He L. P. et al. Quantum Transport Evidence for the Three-Dimensional Dirac Semimetal Phase in Cd3As2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 246402 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Liang T. et al. Ultrahigh mobility and giant magnetoresistance in the Dirac semimetal Cd3As2. Nature Materials 14 280 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Novak M., Sasaki S., Segawa K. & Ando Y. Large linear magnetoresistance in the Dirac semimetal TlBiSSe. arXiv:1408.2183 (2014).
  37. Merlo F., Pani M. & Fornasini M. L. RMX compounds formed by alkaline earths, europium and ytterbium –I. Ternary phases with M = Cu, Ag, Au, X = Sb, Bi. J. Less-Common Metals 166, 319 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhang H. et al. Topological insulators in Bi2Se3, Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3 with a single Dirac cone on the surface. Nature Phys. 5, 438 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu C.-X. et al. Model Hamiltonian for topological insulators. Phys. Rev. B 82, 045122 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang K., Graf D. & Petrovic C. Quasi-two-dimensional Dirac fermions and quantum magnetoresistance in LaAgBi2. Phys. Rev. B 87, 235101 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  41. May A. F., McGuire M. A. & Sales B. C. Effect of Eu magnetism on the electronic properties of the candidate Dirac material EuMnBi2 Phys. Rev. B 90, 075109 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  42. Murakami S. Phase transition between the quantum spin Hall and insulator phases in 3D: emergence of a topological gapless phase. New J. Phys. 9, 356 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  43. Murakami S. & Kuga S.-I. Universal phase diagrams for the quantum spin Hall systems. Phys. Rev. B 78, 165313 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  44. Michels G. et al. Final-state effects in divalent Eu pnictides. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 6, 1769 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  45. Tong J. et al. Magnetic properties of EuCuAs single crystal. J. Alloys Compounds 602, 26 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  46. Burkov A. A. Anomalous Hall Effect in Weyl Metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 187202 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Burkov A. A. Chiral Anomaly and Diffusive Magnetotransport in Weyl Metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 247203 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Son D. T. & Spivak B. Z. Chiral anomaly and classical negative magnetoresistance of Weyl metals. Phys. Rev. B 88, 104412 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  49. Gibson Q. D. et al. 3D Dirac semimetals: current materials, design principles and predictions of new materials. arXiv:1411.0005 (2014).
  50. Blaha P., Schwarz K., Madsen G. K. H., Kvasnicka D. & Luitz J. WIEN2K, An Augmented Plane Wave+ Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties (Karlheinz Schwarz, Technische Universitat Wien, Austria, 2001).
  51. Tran F. & Blaha P. Accurate Band Gaps of Semiconductors and Insulators with a Semilocal Exchange-Correlation Potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 226401 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Slater J. C. & Koster G. F. Simplified LCAO Method for the Periodic Potential Problem. Phys. Rev. 94, 1498 (1954). [Google Scholar]
  53. Bradley C. J. & Cracknell A. P. The Mathematical Theory of Symmetry in Solids: Representation Theory for Point Groups and Space Groups, Oxford University Press, reprinted (2011).

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES