Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Sep 25;5:14465. doi: 10.1038/srep14465

Auxenochlorella protothecoides and Prototheca wickerhamii plastid genome sequences give insight into the origins of non-photosynthetic algae

Dong Yan 1,*,†, Yun Wang 2,*, Tatsuya Murakami 1, Yue Shen 2, Jianhui Gong 2, Huifeng Jiang 3, David R Smith 4, Jean-Francois Pombert 5, Junbiao Dai 1,a, Qingyu Wu 1,b
PMCID: PMC4585924  PMID: 26403826

Abstract

The forfeiting of photosynthetic capabilities has occurred independently many times throughout eukaryotic evolution. But almost all non-photosynthetic plants and algae still retain a colorless plastid and an associated genome, which performs fundamental processes apart from photosynthesis. Unfortunately, little is known about the forces leading to photosynthetic loss; this is largely because there is a lack of data from transitional species. Here, we compare the plastid genomes of two “transitional” green algae: the photosynthetic, mixotrophic Auxenochlorella protothecoides and the non-photosynthetic, obligate heterotroph Prototheca wickerhamii. Remarkably, the plastid genome of A. protothecoides is only slightly larger than that of P. wickerhamii, making it among the smallest plastid genomes yet observed from photosynthetic green algae. Even more surprising, both algae have almost identical plastid genomic architectures and gene compositions (with the exception of genes involved in photosynthesis), implying that they are closely related. This close relationship was further supported by phylogenetic and substitution rate analyses, which suggest that the lineages giving rise to A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii diverged from one another around six million years ago.

There is a diversity of feeding strategies across the tree of life. Photoautotrophs, for instance, produce organic materials through photosynthesis and, thus, do not require exogenous organic matter. Heterotrophs, alternatively, survive on organic components from the environment. In eukaryotes, photosynthesis occurs in the chloroplast, which evolved circa 1.5 billion years ago through the endosymbiosis of a cyanobacterium by a unicellular, heterotrophic protist1,2. Despite the obvious benefits of photosynthesis, many eukaryotes have forfeited their photosynthetic capabilities, including various parasitic land plants and heterotrophic algae3,4,5. With few exceptions6, non-photosynthetic plants and algae still contain a colorless chloroplast (plastid) and a highly reduced plastid genome, both of which continue to carry out essential processes, apart from photosynthesis3,5,7,8,9,10. Among the leading models for understanding the evolutionary loss of photosynthesis are green algae11, including the colorless genera Prototheca, Helicosporidium, Polytoma, and Polytomella.

Currently, the only complete plastid genome sequence available from non-photosynthetic green algae is that of the trebouxiophyte Helicosporidium sp. ATCC 50920, which is a parasite of various invertebrates12. The Helicosporidium plastid DNA (ptDNA) is highly reduced (<40 kb), having lost various genes related to photosynthesis, and is similar in structure and content to the plastid genomes of apicomplexan parasites, such as Plasmodium falciparum8. The closest known relatives of Helicosporidium are from the non-photosynthetic trebouxiophyte genus Prototheca13, which is comprised of ubiquitous opportunistic animal pathogens, some of which can infect humans. Partial ptDNA sequence data from Prototheca wickerhamii14 suggest that its plastid genome is in a “transitional stage” between Helicosporidium and various photosynthetic trebouxiophytes. The closest known photosynthetic relative of Prototheca species is Auxenochlorella protothecoides15,16,17,18, a free-living green alga that can use sugars as carbon sources for heterotrophic growth19,20. When A. protothecoides cells are switched to heterotrophic conditions, their plastids can degenerate, resulting in the suppression and eventual elimination of photosynthesis21,22. Remarkably, this process is reversible, depending on the conditions, and suggests that A. protothecoides could provide insights into the loss of photosynthesis.

Here, in the hopes of better understanding the shift from a photoautotrophic to heterotrophic lifestyle, we report and compare the plastid genome sequences of A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii. Both genomes show a surprising amount of similarities, including severe ptDNA contraction and similar gene orders and gene contents, photosynthesis-related genes notwithstanding. Our phylogenetic inferences and other genomic analyses confirmed that A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii are indeed closely related, with a recent divergence time of about six million years. Together, our results provide interesting clues about the loss of photosynthesis and the evolution of obligate heterotrophy within green algae.

Results

The A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii plastid genomes are paragons of compactness

The A. protothecoides plastid genome is an 84.58 kb, AT-rich (69.2%), circular-mapping molecule (Fig. 1; Supplementary Table S1). It has a compact architecture (24.57% non-coding), with no inverted repeats or introns. The P. wickerhamii ptDNA architecture mirrors that of A. protothecoides: it is small (55.64 kb), circular, AT-rich (68.8%), and compact (28.8% non-coding) (Fig. 1; Supplementary Table S2). These two genomes are among the smallest and most reduced ptDNAs observed from the Trebouxiophyceae (Table 1) and green algae as a whole (Supplementary Table S3). The genomic compaction of the A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii ptDNAs largely results from being no introns and relatively little intergenic DNA (Table 1). Moreover, genes essential for photosynthesis have been lost in P. wickerhamii (discussed below). Further contributing to the ptDNA streamlining in A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii is the lack of plastid inverted repeat elements. The absence of these elements, however, is a reoccurring theme throughout the Trebouxiophyceae (Table 1).

Figure 1. Gene maps of A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii plastid genomes.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The two concentric maps represent the ptDNAs of A. protothecoides (inner circle) and P. wickerhamii (outer circle), respectively. Genes (filled boxes) are color-coded into 9 groups according to their biological functions. Genes on the outside of each map are transcribed in a clockwise direction, whereas those on the inside of each map are transcribed counterclockwise (The direction of transcription is also pointed out by the black arrows). The tRNA genes are indicated by the one-letter amino acid code followed by the anticodon in parentheses. The dashed lines indicate regions absent from the P. wickerhamii genome.

Table 1. General features of known ptDNAs in Trebouxiophytes.

Species Size (bp) %ncDNA (including introns)a,b Mean intergenic distance (bp) Proteinc rRNAd tRNA G + C (%) Inverted repeats Accession
Helicosporidium sp. 37,454 22.2 319 26 3 25 26.9   NC_008100
Prototheca wickerhamii 55,636 28.8 400 40 3 27 31.2 KJ001761
Auxenochlorella protothecoides 84,580 24.6 273 76 3 30 30.8 KC843975
Chlorella sorokiniana 109,811 43.0 629 75 3 31 34.0 NC_023835
Chlorella sp. ArM0029B 119,989 46.2 692 80 3 32 33.9 KF554427
Parachlorella kessleri 123,994 45.3 668 84 6 36 30.0 10,913 NC_012978
Chlorella variabilis 124,579 49.5 770 80 3 32 33.9   NC_015359
Trebouxiophyceae sp. MX-AZ01 149,707 52.2 977 80 3 32 57.7 NC_018569
Chlorella vulgaris 150,613 43.3 375 174 3 33 31.6 NC_001865
Coccomyxa sp. C-169 175,731 60.0 1318 80 3 32 50.7 NC_015084
Leptosira terrestris 195,081 56.8 1259 88 3 28 27.3 NC_009681
Open in a new tab

aConserved genes, unique ORFs and intronic ORFs were counted as coding sequences.

bncDNA; non-coding DNA.

c,dGenes within inverted repeats were counted twice.

The types of plastid genome reduction observed in A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii are not uncommon for green algae, especially non-photosynthetic species. In fact Helicosporidium sp. has one of the smallest ptDNAs ever observed8. Although only about 2/3 the size of that of A. protothecoides, the P. wickerhamii ptDNA is still larger and more expanded than that of Helicosporidium sp. (Reference8 and Table 1).

A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii have similar plastid gene contents

The A. protothecoides ptDNA encodes 76 proteins, 3 rRNAs, and 30 tRNAs, which is among the lowest plastid gene contents currently found in green algae (Table 1; Supplementary Table S3). Not surprisingly, given its non-photosynthetic existence, the P. wickerhamii plastid genome encodes even fewer gene products than A. protothecoides—40 proteins, 3 rRNAs, and 27 tRNAs. All of the genes in the ptDNA of P. wickerhamii are also present in that of A. protothecoides (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). In both A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii, most of the ptDNA genes have the same transcriptional polarity, and, more importantly, the gene orders are highly conserved between these two algae (Fig. 1). Such a high degree of similarity in plastid gene arrangement is rarely observed between photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic species. A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii show fewer regions of plastid gene collinearity with other trebouxiophytes, such as C. variablis and Helicosporidium sp., as they do with each other (Fig. 2). Pairwise plastid-gene-order comparisons using a broader sampling of green algae (Supplementary Figure S1 and S2) further supports the hypothesis that the ptDNA synteny between A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii is among the highest yet observed within the Chlorophyta, when comparing species from distinct lineages.

Figure 2. Gene order comparisons between trebouxiophyte plastid genomes.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Genomes are drawn to scale. Genes are represented by filled boxes; photosynthetic, ATP synthase and rRNA-encoding genes are indicated by green, blue and red boxes, respectively. Identical genes between the genomes are connected by straight lines.

The presence and absence of photosynthesis-related genes in the A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii ptDNAs

A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii have very different modes of energy production—the former is photosynthetic whereas the latter is an obligate heterotroph. Therefore, it is unexpected that various phylogenetic analyses showed that P. wickerhamii is more closely related to A. protothecoides than to Helicosporidium spp., implying that the loss of photosynthesis has occurred at least twice in the Chlorellales11: once in the lineage giving rise to Helicosporidium and once within that giving rise to Prototheca.

To gain more insight into the evolutionary relationships among A. protothecoides, P. wickerhamii, and other algae, we performed a Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis, using peptide sequences from 12 single-copy plastid-encoded proteins from 26 species from throughout the Chlorophyta (Fig. 3A). The resulting tree placed A. protothecoides, P. wickerhamii and Helicosporidium sp. together within a clade adjacent to the one containing Chlorella sp. ArM0029B, C. variabilis, C. vulgaris, P. kessleri, Chlorella sorokiniana, consistent with the fact that all of these algae belong to Chlorellaceae. Moreover, A. protothecoides appears to be most closely (bootstrap support 100%) related to P. wickerhamii. The two algae are separated by relative short branch lengths, suggesting that they diverged from one another recently in evolutionary history. These results are consistent well with the phylogenies based on 18 s rRNA (Supplementary Figure S3) and previous phylogenetic analyses using rRNA genes15,23. In addition, a previous mitochondrial phylogenetic analysis placed P. wickerhamii and Helicosporidium sp. in the same clade24. When we included Helicosporidium sp. in the plastid phylogeny we found that it is rather basal to the A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii clade, suggesting that it is a close relative of P. wickerhamii and A. protothecoides.

Figure 3. Phylogenetic niche of A. protothecoides as inferred from plastid gene sequences and average plastid mutation rates within the Chlorophyta.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(A) The best Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree computed with PHYML under the LG + G8 + I model of amino acid substitution is shown here, with prasinophytes used as outgroups. Bootstrap support for each clade is indicated on the corresponding node. (B) Average synonymous mutation rate (Ks) among A. protothecoides and nine related species. (C) Average non-synonymous mutation rate (Ka) among A. protothecoides and nine related species.

The rate of synonymous substitution (Ks) can be used to estimate the divergent time among species25. The average Ks of plastid genes between A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii is 0.816 (Fig. 3B). If we assume that the nuclear mutation rate in unicellular green alga26 is 3.23 × 10−10 substitution per generation, then the number of generation that occurred since their divergence between A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii is about 2.52 × 109. When considering that single-celled algae typically have a short generation time and that they typically have similar mutation rates in their plastid and nuclear genomes27,28,29,30, then the predicted time of divergent time for A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii should be between six to twenty million years. Further supporting the hypothesis that A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii are closely related is the fact that the levels of synonymous substitution in the ptDNA are not saturated (<1) and are in fact similar to those observed between other closely related algal strains or species27,28,29. Furthermore, we calculated the similarity of each gene, as well as the 5′UTR (50 bp upstream of ATG) between P. wickerhamii ptDNA and its 17 relatives. We found that the overall similarities between the plastid genomes of P. wickerhamii and A. protothecoides are highest (Supplementary Figure S4) in all the comparisons. Among them, the tRNA genes are more conserved than other coding genes, while the upstream of tRNA genes is more diverged than the coding genes.

We also investigated the various plastid genomic changes that occurred in the Prototheca lineage following the loss of photosynthesis. Among 109 genes in the ptDNA of A. protothecoides ptDNA, 70 are also present in that of P. wickerhamii, meaning 39 genes were lost from the lineage of P. wickerhamii following its divergence from that of A. protothecoides (Supplementary Table S1 and S2). The majority of the missing genes are related to photosynthesis. For instance, in the A. protothecoides plastid genome, 31 genes are involved in photosynthesis, and these genes have been lost from P. wickerhamii (and Helicosporidium sp.) (Supplementary Table S4 and S5). Three other genes (ycf3, ycf4 and ycf12), with ambiguous functions but likely connected to photosynthesis31,32,33, are also absent from the P. wickerhamii ptDNA, as are cemA and ccsA, which encode a plastid envelope membrane protein34 and cytochrome c-type biogenesis protein35, respectively. Finally, three tRNAs, (trnL(GAG)), trnS(GGA) and trnT(GGU)) have also been eliminated from the P. wickerhamii plastid. Significant gene content differences were also observed between P. wickerhamii and Helicosporidium sp. (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table S3 and S4), indicating a more complex metabolism in P. wickerhamii’s plastid compared with that predicted to be located in the plastid of Helicosporidium sp.36.

To investigate the molecular mechanisms of plastid gene loss from P. wickerhamii, we analyzed the junctions flanking deleted genes and gene clusters relative to A. protothecoides. In total, 17 regions containing missing genes were identified (labeled breakpoint BP 1 to BP17), ranging from <0.5 kb to >7.5 kb (Supplementary Table S6 and Supplementary Figure S5). Most of the junctions show no sequence similarity, but they do tend to be very AT rich (average >85%), and 13 of the 17 BPs are adjacent to a tRNA gene.

We compared in detail the ptDNAs of P. wickerhamii and Helicosporidium sp., and found that although both genomes are reduced, the overall architecture are quite different. In the Helicosporidium ptDNA, the rRNA operon is split, and the coding regions display a symmetric strand bias8. In contrast, the P. wickerhamii plastid has a “typical” intact rRNA operon and the coding sequences have an asymmetric strand bias—almost all genes are transcribed in one direction (Fig. 1).

Discussion

The ptDNAs of non-photosynthetic species are generally <80 kb, making them much smaller than those of most photosynthetic plants and algae, which are about 100–200 kb37, with some notable exceptions38. In this study, we showed that the A. protothecoides ptDNA is among the smallest observed from photosynthetic algae, particularly those from the Trebouxiophyceae and Chlorophyceae. Moreover, the ptDNA architecture and sequence of A. protothecoides is similar in many ways to that of its close non-photosynthetic relative P. wickerhamii (Figs 1 and 2, Table 1). Indeed, the only significant difference between the ptDNAs of these two algae is the loss of photosynthesis-related genes in the latter. Again, our phylogenetic analyses are consistent with earlier studies showing that A. protothecoides is more closely related to P. wickerhamii than it is to other species within the Chlorellales23, and ultimately support the independent loss of photosynthesis in the P. wickerhamii and Helicosporidium lineages.

A. protothecoides is a free-living mixotrophic alga and, thus, can survive heterotrophically, provided it has organic carbon sources—a feature that has been exploited to produce large amount of biomass in a short period of time20. P. wickerhamii, on the other hand, is a widely distributed, obligate heterotrophic alga, that can act as an opportunistic pathogens to infect humans39 and animals40. Although these two algae could not have more drastically different lifestyles41,42, we found that both share a surprisingly high level of ptDNA sequence identity, which explains that A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii are more closely related to one another than they are to other members of the Chlorella and Prototheca genera, and validates previous results using phylogeny15.

The major difference between the A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii ptDNA is the presence of photosynthesis-related genes. Given the high similarity in gene content and genomic structure between A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii, it is almost certain that they share a recent common photosynthetic ancestor, perhaps as recently as ~6 million years ago. At some point after the two lineages diverged, photosynthesis was lost in the P. wickerhamii lineage, resulting in the wholesale loss of photosynthetic genes, whereas in the A. protothecoides lineage photosynthesis has been maintained. Ultimately, the close relationship between the two algae suggests that they could represent an excellent duo for studying the evolutionary loss of photosynthesis.

Methods

Strains and Cultivation Conditions

The A. protothecoides strain, the medium and cultivation methods used in this study have been described previously43. The P. wickerhamii strain (SAG 263-11) was purchased from the Culture Collection of Algae at the University of Göttingen, Germany (SAG) and cultured in malt peptone medium containing 10 g/L malt extract (Sigma) and 2.5 g/L proteose-peptone (Sigma).

Organelle genome sequencing and annotation

The complete P. wickerhamii plastid genome was obtained using Sanger chemistry and assembled with the SeqMan program from the DNASTAR Lasergene package. The sequencing primers were designed based on the partially sequenced genome (GenBank: AJ245645.1 and AJ236874.113). To close the gaps, a set of primers was designed based on the conserved genes found in both A. protothecoides and Helicosporidiium sp. The A. protothecoides plastid genome was obtained as part of the whole genome-sequencing project18 (GenBank: APJO01001039.1 and APJO01001000.1). All primer sequences are available upon request.

Both the A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii plastid genomes were annotated using the same methods. The gene sets were originally annotated by Dogma (Dual Organellar GenoMe Annotator)44 and then curated manually. Protein-coding genes and non-coding RNAs with percent identity lower than 25 and 80 respectively were cut off (E-value 1e-5). Protein-coding genes were examined by Blastx searches against the NCBI non-redundant protein (nr) database and their boundaries adjusted manually whereas tRNA-coding genes were identified by tRNAscan-SE 1.2345 using organelle parameters. The complete sequences of the A. protothecoides and P. wickerhamii plastid genomes have been deposited into GenBank under the access numbers KC843975 (A. protothecoides) and KJ001761 (P. wickerhamii).

Pairwise alignment and comparison

The pairwise alignments were performed by Blastn (E-value <= 1e-05) in bl2seq 2.2.2346 with ‘−1’ as a penalty for a nucleotide mismatch. Each hit was used to estimate the average identity for all alignments or in 100bp-long windows. In gene order comparisons, protein-coding gene and rRNA gene were considered and identified by gene name. C. variabilis NC64A and Helicosporidium plastid genomes were adjusted for comparison correspondingly. C. variabilis NC64A was reversed and started with atpI, while Helicosporidium sp. started with rpl12.

For mutation rate analyses, we did pairwise alignments using GeneWise for each orthologous gene47. The software YN00 in the package PAML 4.8a was used to estimate the synonymous and non-synonymous mutation rate (KS&KA)48. Li’s model49 was used for estimating DNA divergence time (the generation times using for calculation were 24 h = 0.00274y for heterotroph and 72 h = 0.008219y for autotroph).

Phylogenetic tree construction

We used the TreeFam methodology50 to define orthologous genes among taxa as follows: the all-versus-all peptide sequence alignments of protein-coding genes were performed using blastp 2.2.23 (no SEG query sequence filtering, E-value threshold of 1e-7), the blastp alignments were combined and filtered using SOLAR 0.9.6 (pairwise gene alignment rate of 0.24), and the clustering was performed with Hcluster_sg 0.5.0 (minimum edge weight 10, minimum edge density 0.34).

A total of 12 single-copy TreeFam protein-encoding gene clusters (tufA, rpoC1, rps7, rps8, rps11, rps12, rps19, rpl2, rpl5, rpl14, rpl16, rpl20) from 26 Chlorophyta taxa were defined. The amino acid sequences were aligned with MUSCLE 3.751 and the ambiguously aligned regions were filtered out with BMGE 1.152 using the default parameters. Maximum-Likelihood phylogenetic inferences were run with PhyML 3.053 under the LG + G + I model of amino acid substitution (8 gamma categories), selected with the Model Selection (ML) module from MEGA 6.0554. A total of 100 non-parametric bootstrap replicates were performed, as implemented in PHYML.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Yan, D. et al. Auxenochlorella protothecoides and Prototheca wickerhamii plastid genome sequences give insight into the origins of non-photosynthetic algae. Sci. Rep. 5, 14465; doi: 10.1038/srep14465 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep14465-s1.doc (3.5MB, doc)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by MOST project 2011CB808804 and 2014AA02200, NSFC project 31370282 and 41030210 to Q.W. and by Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program 2011Z02296 and 2012Z08128 to J.D.

Footnotes

Author Contributions Y.D. conducted experiments and wrote the paper. Y.W. assembled and annotated the genome, conducted analyses, and wrote part of the paper. TM prepared the P. wickerhamii genome samples. Y.S. and J.G. performed bioinformatics analyses. H.J. analyzed the mutation rates. D.R.S. and J.F.P. performed analyses and helped draft the manuscript. J.D. and Q.W. conceived the study, conducted analysis, and wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Gould S. B., Waller R. F. & McFadden G. I. Plastid evolution. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59, 491–517 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gross J. & Bhattacharya D. Mitochondrial and plastid evolution in eukaryotes: an outsiders’ perspective. Nat Rev Genet 10, 495–505 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Keeling P. J. The endosymbiotic origin, diversification and fate of plastids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365, 729–748 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Williams B. A. & Hirt R. P. RACE and RAGE cloning in parasitic microbial eukaryotes. Methods Mol Biol 270, 151–172 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Krause K. From chloroplasts to “cryptic” plastids: evolution of plastid genomes in parasitic plants. Curr Genet 54, 111–121 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Smith D. R. & Lee R. W. A plastid without a genome: evidence from the nonphotosynthetic green algal genus Polytomella. Plant Physiol 164, 1812–1819 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Turmel M., Pombert J. F., Charlebois P., Otis C. & Lemieux C. The Green Algal Ancestry of Land Plants as Revealed by the Chloroplast Genome. International Journal of Plant Sciences 168, 679–689 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  8. de Koning A. P. & Keeling P. J. The complete plastid genome sequence of the parasitic green alga Helicosporidium sp. is highly reduced and structured. BMC Biol 4, 12 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gockel G. & Hachtel W. Complete gene map of the plastid genome of the nonphotosynthetic euglenoid flagellate Astasia longa. Protist 151, 347–351 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Molina J. et al. Possible loss of the chloroplast genome in the parasitic flowering plant Rafflesia lagascae (Rafflesiaceae). Mol Biol Evol 31, 793–803 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Figueroa-Martinez F., Nedelcu A. M., Smith D. R. & Reyes-Prieto A. When the lights go out: the evolutionary fate of free-living colorless green algae. New Phytologist n/a-n/a (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tartar A. The Non-Photosynthetic Algae Helicosporidium spp.: Emergence of a Novel Group of Insect Pathogens. Insects 4, 375–391 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tartar A., Boucias D. G., Becnel J. J. & Adams B. J. Comparison of plastid 16S rRNA (rrn16) genes from Helicosporidium spp.: evidence supporting the reclassification of Helicosporidia as green algae (Chlorophyta). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53, 1719–1723 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Knauf U. & Hachtel W. The genes encoding subunits of ATP synthase are conserved in the reduced plastid genome of the heterotrophic alga Prototheca wickerhamii. Mol Genet Genomics 267, 492–497 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ueno R., Urano N. & Suzuki M. Phylogeny of the non-photosynthetic green micro-algal genus Prototheca (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta) and related taxa inferred from SSU and LSU ribosomal DNA partial sequence data. FEMS Microbiol Lett 223, 275–280 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ewing A. et al. 16S and 23S plastid rDNA phylogenies of species and their auxanographic phenotypes. J Phycol 50, 765–769 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Darienko T. & Proschold T. Genetic Variability And Taxonomic Revision Of the Genus Auxenochlorella (Shihira Et Krauss) Kalina Et Puncocharova (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta). Journal Of Phycology 51, 394–400 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Champenois J., Marfaing H. & Pierre R. Review of the taxonomic revision of Chlorella and consequences for its food uses in Europe. Journal of Applied Phycology (2014). [Google Scholar]
  19. Shi X. M. & Chen F. Production and rapid extraction of lutein and the other lipid-soluble pigments from Chlorella protothecoides grown under heterotrophic and mixotrophic conditions. Food/Nahrung 43, 109–113 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  20. Miao X. & Wu Q. Biodiesel production from heterotrophic microalgal oil. Bioresour Technol 97, 841–846 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Xiong W., Gao C., Yan D., Wu C. & Wu Q. Double CO2 fixation in photosynthesis-fermentation model enhances algal lipid synthesis for biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol 101, 2287–2293 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gao C. et al. Oil accumulation mechanisms of the oleaginous microalga Chlorella protothecoides revealed through its genome, transcriptomes, and proteomes. BMC Genomics 15, 582 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Blanc G. et al. The Chlorella variabilis NC64A genome reveals adaptation to photosymbiosis, coevolution with viruses, and cryptic sex. Plant Cell 22, 2943–2955 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Smith D. R. et al. The GC-rich mitochondrial and plastid genomes of the green alga Coccomyxa give insight into the evolution of organelle DNA nucleotide landscape. PLoS One 6, e23624 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nei M. & Kumar S. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. 52–256 (Oxford University Press, 2000). [Google Scholar]
  26. Ness R. W., M. A., Colegrave N. & Keightley P. D. Estimate of the spontaneous mutation rate in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Genetics 192, 1447–1454 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hua J., Smith D. R., Borza T. & Lee R. W. Similar relative mutation rates in the three genetic compartments of Mesostigma and Chlamydomonas. Protist 163, 105–115 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith D. R., Arrigo K. R., Alderkamp A. C. & Allen A. E. Massive difference in synonymous substitution rates among mitochondrial, plastid, and nuclear genes of Phaeocystis algae. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 71, 36–40 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Smith D. R., Jackson C. J. & Reyes-Prieto A. Nucleotide substitution analyses of the glaucophyte Cyanophora suggest an ancestrally lower mutation rate in plastid vs mitochondrial DNA for the Archaeplastida. Mol Phylogenet Evol 79, 380–384 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Santos C. et al. Mutation patterns of mtDNA: empirical inferences for the coding region. BMC Evol Biol 8, 167 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Boudreau E., Takahashi Y., Lemieux C., Turmel M. & Rochaix J. D. The chloroplast ycf3 and ycf4 open reading frames of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii are required for the accumulation of the photosystem I complex. EMBO J 16, 6095–6104 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Naver H., Boudreau E. & Rochaix J. D. Functional studies of Ycf3: its role in assembly of photosystem I and interactions with some of its subunits. Plant Cell 13, 2731–2745 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kashino Y. et al. Ycf12 is a core subunit in the photosystem II complex. Biochim Biophys Acta 1767, 1269–1275 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Katoh A., Lee K. S., Fukuzawa H., Ohyama K. & Ogawa T. cemA homologue essential to CO2 transport in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC6803. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 4006–4010 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Feissner R. E., Beckett C. S., Loughman J. A. & Kranz R. G. Mutations in cytochrome assembly and periplasmic redox pathways in Bordetella pertussis. J Bacteriol 187, 3941–3949 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Borza T., Popescu C. E. & Lee R. W. Multiple metabolic roles for the nonphotosynthetic plastid of the green alga Prototheca wickerhamii. Eukaryot Cell 4, 253–261 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Barbrook A. C., Howe C. J. & Purton S. Why are plastid genomes retained in non- photosynthetic organisms? Trends Plant Sci 11, 101–108 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Del Vasto M. et al. Massive and widespread organelle genomic expansion in the green algal genus dunaliella. Genome biology and evolution 7, 656–663 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kantrow S. M. & Boyd A. S. Protothecosis. Dermatol Clin 21, 249–255 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hollingsworth S. R. Canine protothecosis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 30, 1091–1101 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Huss V. A. R., Frank C., Hartmann E., Hirmer M., Kloboucek A., Seidel B. M., Wenzeler P. & Kessler E. Biochemical taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of the genus Chlorella sensu lato (Chlorophyta). J Phycol 35, 587–598 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  42. Ueno R., Hanagata N., Urano N. & Suzuki M. Molecular phylogeny and phenotypic variation in the heterotrophic green algal genus Prototheca (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta). J Phycol 41, 1268–1280 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  43. Yan D., Lu Y., Chen Y. F. & Wu Q. Waste molasses alone displaces glucose-based medium for microalgal fermentation towards cost-saving biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol 102, 6487–6493 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wyman S. K., Jansen R. K. & Boore J. L. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics 20, 3252–3255 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lowe T. M. & Eddy S. R. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 955–964 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tatusova T. A. & Madden T. L. BLAST 2 Sequences, a new tool for comparing protein and nucleotide sequences. FEMS Microbiol Lett 174, 247–250 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Birney E., Clamp M. & Durbin R. GeneWise and Genomewise. Genome Res 14, 988–995 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Yang Z. & Nielsen R. Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evol 17, 32–43 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Li W. Molecular Evolution (MA: Sinauer Associates, 1997). [Google Scholar]
  50. Li H. et al. TreeFam: a curated database of phylogenetic trees of animal gene families. Nucleic Acids Res 34, D572–580 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Edgar R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 1792–1797 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Criscuolo A. & Gribaldo S. BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): a new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evol Biol 10, 210 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Guindon S. et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum- likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59, 307–321 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D., Filipski A. & Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30, 2725–2729 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep14465-s1.doc (3.5MB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES