Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the largest cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease, with nearly half of all deaths attributed to cardiovascular disease. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), an anti-inflammatory drug, has been shown to have multiple pleiotropic actions relevant to atherosclerosis. We conducted a proof-of-efficacy study to evaluate the effects of hydroxychloroquine in an animal model of atherosclerosis in ApoE knockout mice with and without chronic kidney disease. Forty male, 6-week-old mice were divided into four groups in a 2 x 2 design: sham placebo group; sham treatment group; CKD placebo group; and CKD treatment group. CKD was induced by a two-step surgical procedure. All mice received a high-fat diet through the study duration and were sacrificed after 16 weeks of therapy. Mice were monitored with ante-mortem ultrasonic echography (AUE) for atherosclerosis and vascular stiffness and with post-mortem histology studies for atherosclerosis. Therapy with HCQ significantly reduced the severity of atherosclerosis in CKD mice and sham treated mice. HCQ reduced the area of aortic atherosclerosis on en face examination by approximately 60% in HCQ treated groups compared to the non-treated groups. Additionally, therapy with HCQ resulted in significant reduction in vascular endothelial dysfunction with improvement in vascular elasticity and flow patterns and better-preserved vascular wall thickness across multiple vascular beds. More importantly, we found that presence of CKD had no mitigating effect on HCQ’s anti-atherosclerotic and vasculoprotective effects. These beneficial effects were not due to any significant effect of HCQ on inflammation, renal function, or lipid profile at the end of 16 weeks of therapy. This study, which demonstrates structural and functional protection against atherosclerosis by HCQ, provides a rationale to evaluate its use in CKD patients. Further studies are needed to define the exact mechanisms through which HCQ confers these benefits.
Introduction
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the largest cause of morbidity and mortality[1, 2] among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), with nearly half of all deaths attributed to CVD[1]. Though no single factor thus far has been identified as the driver for this cardiovascular (CV) burden; inflammation, vascular stiffness likely resulting from endothelial dysfunction, and accelerated atherosclerosis are considered prominent factors contributing to the high rates of CVD in CKD.
Therapeutic interventions conventionally proven to be effective in CVD among patients with normal renal functions, have limited if any efficacy in presence of significant CKD. For example, HMG coenzyme A inhibitors, statins, when studied in CKD and ESKD populations have failed to show a significant reduction in CV mortality[3–7], even though some data suggest that they might be effective in reducing the rates for CV events[4]. When studied in animal models of atherosclerosis, statins failed to reduce the severity of atherosclerosis in presence of uremia; a sharp departure from their proven efficacy in presence of normal renal function[8]. Similarly, many therapies targeted toward management of renal failure (such as quotidian dialysis)[9], or its consequences (bone-mineral disease, anemia, etc.) have also failed to reduce the high CV mortality associated with CKD[3, 4, 7, 9, 10].
These factors have led to a high CV mortality in CKD[2] that has remained largely unchanged over the last two decades,[11] and at present time we do not have an effective management strategy that reduces the high CV mortality in CKD and ESKD. Thus there is an urgent need to investigate unique therapies that are efficacious against atherosclerosis and vascular disease, not just in presence of normal renal function, but also in presence of uremic milieu. Most patients suffering from CKD have multiple traditional and nontraditional CV risk factors such as chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, reduced vascular compliance, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome[12]and these factors have been repeatedly shown to contribute not only toward the pathogenesis of CVD in CKD but also a state of refractoriness toward conventional therapies[13].
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an anti-malarial drug that is commonly used in clinical practice for its anti-inflammatory actions. Multiple in vivo, in vitro, and cohort-based reports over the last two decades show that, in addition to being anti-inflammatory, HCQ has multiple other properties that include beneficial effects on vascular compliance and endothelial function,[14] insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome,[15–17] and immune dysfunction.[18, 19] Recently when studying the p-53 based stress signaling in the metabolic syndrome, investigators have found signals for a possible anti-atherosclerosis effect for HCQ in presence of normal renal function[17]. However, as the statin experience suggests, the efficacy in presence of normal renal function does not automatically prove the efficacy in presence of uremic milieu and the impact of HCQ as an anti-atherosclerosis as well as vasculoprotective agent in a uremic milieu has not been examined previously. We present the findings of our proof-of-efficacy animal study in ApoE-/- mice aimed to examine whether HCQ has beneficial effects on atherosclerosis and vascular disease in presence of a uremic state.
Materials and Methods
Mice were maintained in the Veterans Administration Medical Unit (VAMU) at Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, Arkansas, in accordance with the U.S. National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC #12-11-1) of Central Arkansas Veteran Healthcare System on animal care. Forty-two male, 6- to 8-week-old ApoE-/- mice with a C57BL6 background (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) were divided into two different groups after an initial week of acclimatization: a CKD group (n = 26) and a sham group (n = 16). Mice in the CKD group underwent a two-step surgical process (cortical electrocoagulation of 80% of the right kidney followed two weeks later by a left kidney total nephrectomy), originally described by Gagnon et al.[20] and validated in our laboratories[21], to establish a reduced renal mass and induce CKD. The sham-operated mice underwent a right-flank incision and closure in the first stage of surgery and a left-flank incision and closure in the second stage of surgery and served as groups with normal renal function. All surgeries were performed under ketamine/xylazine (91.0/9.1 mg/kg, i.p.) anesthesia and all efforts were made to minimize the pain and potential distress by two post-operative analgesic injections of buprenorphine (0.05mg/kg, 0.1 ml) administered subcutaneously for one day.
All mice underwent serial blood work obtained by retro-orbital puncture for blood urea nitrogen and creatinine assessment every four weeks during the study period.
After surgery, all mice were fed a high-fat diet (Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI) with 21% total fat and 0.15% cholesterol to exacerbate hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis development. Both CKD and sham groups of mice were divided further into those receiving HCQ (treatment groups) and those treated with placebo (controls), creating four final groups: (1) a sham control group (n = 8); (2) a sham treatment group (n = 8); (3) a CKD control group (n = 13); and (4) a CKD treatment group (n = 11). HCQ was administered in drinking water to achieve a therapeutic dose of 10 mg/kg/day. The dose of HCQ was selected based on the conventional low dose (6–10mg/kg/day) of HCQ used in human populations where the pleiotropic cardioprotective actions of HCQ have been demonstrated[14, 15, 22], and also in a prior animal study in a similar model in the presence of normal renal function[17]. The feasibility of HCQ mixed in the water supply and its effects on daily water intake were tested through a prior pilot observation study in the same strain of mice. Animals were group-housed in an animal care facility with 3–4 animals per cage.
Ante-mortem ultrasound echography (AUE) is an excellent tool to visualize the development and progression of atherosclerosis in mice and to evaluate the impact of modulating factors or interventions[23]. We performed an AUE of the aorta and major vessels at baseline, 12 weeks, and 16 weeks (just prior to sacrifice) into the study using the VisualSonics (Toronto, CAN) Vevo 770 in B mode (for the evaluation of the extent of atherosclerotic lesions), in M mode (for wall density and thickness at the pre-specified locations), and in Doppler mode (for rigidity and flow evaluations)[21, 24]. The detailed procedures and technique for this AUE examination have been published previously by our laboratory[21]. All mice were studied for a total duration of 16 weeks, with the last assessment for biochemical parameters and AUE at the time of sacrifice. Vascular wall thickness was obtained by the measurement of arterial wall thickness in 3–5 images taken of the vessel. Measurements and analysis were made separately for the upper and lower walls visible on AUE by an operator blinded to the identity of the animal.
Mice were euthanized at the end of sixteen weeks of therapy (at 23–24 weeks of age) with 300 mg/kg ketamine and 30 mg/kg 6 mg/kg xylazine (IP) followed by exsanguinations, and the sera and tissue were collected for the biochemical and histological assessments. Postmortem assessments included en face staining of the entire aortas with Sudan IV stain to detect the extent of atherosclerotic lesions (% of total aortic area with atherosclerotic lesions). Images of en face preparations of the whole aortas with atherosclerotic lesions were captured with a Nikon J1camera (Nikon, Melville, NY). The quantification of atherosclerotic lesions in full-length aorta, aortic arch, innominate artery (from the branching point to the Y-shaped bifurcation), thoracic aorta, and abdominal aorta were compared by using computerized analysis using the Image J. v 1.46 software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), with lesions expressed as percentage of total vascular surface for each animal and the result was expressed as the percent of surface area of the entire aorta. For Oil Red O (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) staining for the cross-sectional analysis of lipid and fatty deposits in the aortic roots, the aorta along with the 3-mm lengths of ascending aorta (2 to 3 mm proximal to the brachiocephalic artery) was removed and frozen in OCT compound (Tissue-Tek, Sakura Finetek, Tokyo, Japan). 5 μm thick cryosections were stained with Oil Red O and counterstained with hematoxylin. For quantitative analysis of atherosclerosis, the total lesion area of the cross-sections was captured with a Nikon DS camera and analyzed by Image J. v 1.46 software. Mean plaque area of the aortic sinus was assessed and compared among the groups. Aortic roots (3 mm pieces of ascending aorta) were separated prior to en face staining and used for cryosectioning to assess atherosclerotic lesions in the aortic bulb. Additionally, mice sera were tested for lipids, IL-6 (Rey Biotech, Inc. Norcross, GA, cat. # ELM-IL-6-001), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP; Antibodies-online, Inc. Atlanta, GA, cat. # ABIN415420), and soluble VCAM-1 (Quantikine ELISA kit, R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN cat. #MVC00) according to the manufacturers’ instructions.
Statistical Analysis
All analyses were performed with the use of software GraphPad InStat 3, version 6.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA) and SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD and compared by Student’s t-test if it is independent and normally distributed, or Kruskal-Wallis test if it is independent but not normally distributed. The Friedman test was used to compare the significance of differences at multiple time points for elasticity and velocity. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine the main effects and the interactions of CKD and drug intervention on atherosclerosis and vascular thickness. Post-hoc Tukey’s and Dunn tests were applied when comparing three or more groups. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Table 1 shows the morphologic and biochemical parameters among all four groups at the end of the 16 weeks of therapy. Two mice died due to anesthesia complications, leaving 8 mice each in both sham groups and eleven and thirteen mice in CKD treatment and control groups, respectively. There was no significant difference among the various groups for weight, daily water intake, and daily food intake. The water intake between all groups was similar and the final HCQ dosing was achieved as desired.
Table 1. Quantification of serum urea nitrogen (BUN), total bilirubin (TBIL), glucose (GLU) among all groups of mice at the time of sacrifice after 16 weeks of therapy with either HCQ or placebo.
Sham control (n = 8) | Sham treatment (n = 8) | CKD control (n = 13) | CKD treatment (n = 13) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BUN (mg/dl) | 20±1.4 | 26±2.0 | 90±12.3* | 114±18.0 † |
TBIL (mg/dl) | 0.33±0.0 | 0.33±0.0 | 0.35±0.0 | 0.4±0.0 |
GLU (mg/dl) | 152±6.5 | 159±13.2 | 163±10.4 | 175±6.5 |
Body weight (g) | 28.7 ±0.5 | 29±0.7 | 25.6±0.7 | 25.3±0.5 |
Food intake (g/24h) | 3.3±0.5 | 3.0±0.7 | 2.9±0.4 | 3.0±0.6 |
Water/HCQ intake (ml/24h) | 7.1±1.8 | 8.4±1 | 7.7±1.7 | 8.4±1.5 |
Body weight and daily food and water intake did not differ among different groups based on either presence or absence of CKD or therapy with HCQ or placebo.
Data presented as means ± SD
*P<0.001 versus sham control
†P<0.01 versus sham treatment by unpaired t-test.
Impact of HCQ on atherosclerosis: antemortem and postmortem evaluations
Fig 1 shows the ante-mortem AUE evaluation for aorta and major vessels in B and M mode echography and Doppler of the major vessels in the CKD groups of mice at the end of 16 weeks of therapy. The AUE studies were performed at baseline and 12 and 16 weeks into therapy just prior to sacrifice. The area of atherosclerosis was measured by identification of echo-dense atherosclerotic plaques on B-mode echography of the great vessels. We found that the extent of atherosclerosis on AUE examination was significantly reduced in mice receiving HCQ therapy (Fig 1B) compared to the controls (Fig 1A) at 12 weeks into the therapy. This continued to be evident on the examination performed at the end of the study at 16 weeks of therapy. The beneficial effects were evident in mice with CKD and with normal renal function.
We also measured the vascular wall thickness at pre-specified locations at their origin through the M-mode echo examination on AUE at the aortic arch and branching of major vessels (e.g. common carotid artery, left subclavian artery, and innominate artery). The progression of atherosclerosis was associated with progressive thickening of the vascular wall in all groups of mice. The vessel wall thickness was significantly lower among mice treated with HCQ compared to those that were not treated with HCQ (Fig 2), both in mice with normal renal function as well as those with CKD. The results from two-way ANOVA analyses further confirmed that HCQ therapy significantly associated with better preservation of thickness on these vascular walls (P < .0001 for aortic arch, left subclavian artery, and innominate artery).
Figs 3–5 show the postmortem data for the extent and severity of atherosclerosis in both CKD and non-CKD groups of mice. HCQ significantly reduced the area of atherosclerosis as evidenced on en face Sudan IV staining of the whole aorta (Figs 3 and 4) in the CKD treatment group (20.75 ± 3.3%) compared to CKD control mice (47.48 ± 4.1%) (P<0.001). This was accompanied by a significant reduction in the severity of atherosclerosis in the aortic bulb on Oil Red O examination in CKD treatment mice compared to control CKD (Fig 5). Similar beneficial effects were confirmed in non-CKD/sham groups, with a reduction in atherosclerotic plaques from 43.18 ± 3.7% (untreated) to 17.53± 2.4% (in treated group (P<0.001), validating the results of a prior study in a non-CKD state (Figs 4 and 5)[16]. This was also confirmed in the two-way ANOVA model (β estimate ± SE: -23.5 ± 5.2, P < .0001).
Impact of HCQ on vascular functions
We measured the vascular endothelial function through the antemortem measurements of vascular elasticity and blood-flow dynamics for all major vessels on AUE using the M mode and Doppler mode. We observed a significant and progressive reduction in vascular elasticity (Figs 6 and 7) and blood flow parameters (Fig 7) in all major vessels over the study period in all groups of mice, in tandem with development of atherosclerosis. Mice receiving HCQ therapy had better preservation of the functional indices of aortic and vascular compliance as determined through the M-mode and Doppler assessments (Fig 7) compared to the mice not receiving HCQ. In parallel with histologic protection, the beneficial effects for HCQ were seen equally potent in the presence of uremic milieu when compared to those with normal renal function (sham groups).
Impact of HCQ on inflammation and select biochemical parameters
HCQ is an anti-inflammatory drug and inflammation has been proposed to have a significant role in many complications of CKD including CVD and renal failure progression. We examined the impact of HCQ on inflammation, renal functions, and lipids parameters.
We evaluated the impact of HCQ on systemic inflammation by measuring the serum levels of hsCRP. Therapy with HCQ did not affect the levels of hsCRP in mice with CKD (Table 2). To confirm these results, we conducted CRP measurements in another laboratory at our institution and obtained similar results (data not shown). Treatment with HCQ did not affect IL-6 levels or VCAM levels in the CKD group (Table 2). Similarly, there was no impact of HCQ on the lipid profile in these hyperlipemic mice or on the severity of renal failure between both CKD groups (Table 2).
Table 2. Serum biochemical parameters at the time of sacrifice.
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | LDL (mg/dL) | IL-6 pg/mL | sVCAM-1 ng/mL | CRP ng/mL | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sham control (n = 8) | 883.2±60.9 | 532±34 | 494.8±138.8 | 714.3±50.1 | 14.6±9 |
Sham treated (n = 8) | 842.9±41.9 | 526±25.9 | 470.2±164.6 | 679.8±42.8 | 13.6±17 |
CKD control (n = 13) | 957.4±39.5 | 616.3±44.3 | 394.8±143.9 | 838.8±3 | 33.9±2* |
CKD treated (n = 11) | 1010.9±60.5 | 609.7±29.8 | 369±130.9 | 826.7±29.5 † | 29.9±1 † |
Serum biochemical parameters for total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), interleukin-6 (IL-6), soluble vascular cell-adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) at the study end, at the time of sacrifice in all groups of mice.
Data presented as means±SD
Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn post-hoc test
*P<0.01 vs. sham control
†P<0.05 vs. sham treated.
Discussion
Our study demonstrates that HCQ confers a significant functional and histological protection against vascular stiffness and atherosclerosis in presence of uremic milieu. HCQ substantially reduced the severity of atherosclerosis (by ~60%) in these atherogenic mice, improved vascular compliance, and prevented vessel wall thickness. More importantly, the anti-atherosclerotic and vasculoprotective effects of HCQ were not mitigated by and appeared to be equally potent in the presence of uremic milieu.
The principle outcome of our study is the validation of strong atheroprotective effects for HCQ even in the presence of CKD. HMG Co-A inhibitors (statins), the mainstay for management of atherosclerotic CVD, have strong evidence for their efficacy in animal atherosclerosis models and in human clinical trials in the presence of normal renal function[25–27]. However, when Ivanovski et al. evaluated their efficacy in a similar animal model in the presence of uremia, they found that statins do not reduce the severity of atherosclerosis in the uremic milieu[8]. Clinically as well, statins have repeatedly failed to reduce cardiovascular or all-cause mortality when studied for their efficacy in high CVD and CKD/ESKD populations[5, 6]. Together, these statin data suggest that the therapeutic efficacy of an anti-atherosclerotic agent proven in the presence of normal renal function does not automatically translate into an effective therapy in the presence of uremic milieu and that statins as a sole strategy for the management of CVD in CKD is inadequate. Our study provides evidence for an in vivo anti-atherosclerotic efficacy for HCQ in CKD. Previous studies demonstrating that HCQ is safe to use in the presence of advanced CKD thus make clinical trials feasible.
Clinically, endothelial dysfunction with resultant vascular stiffness, inflammation, and accelerated atherosclerosis are prominent factors for CVD associated with CKD[28]: Endothelial injury and dysfunction with reduction in NO availability, and resultant increase in vascular stiffness are some of the earliest events evident in CV injury. Endothelial integrity and NO availability have important roles in the maintenance of vascular tone, control of inflammation, smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration, and thrombogenesis, fibrinolysis,[29] and eventual downstream worsening of atherosclerosis.
Ghigo et al. through their in vitro studies have shown that HCQ stimulates vascular endothelial cell NO release[30]. Multiple in vivo studies in animal models of lupus, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome have since shown a beneficial impact of HCQ vascular endothelial cell function, as judged by improvement in endothelial dependent vasodilation[31–34]. Even studies involving human rheumatological cohorts have shown that long-term use of low-dose HCQ is associated with an improvement in indices of vascular compliance, e.g. aortic pulse wave velocity (APWV) and reduction in new-onset hypertension[14, 35, 36].
Endothelial dysfunction as measured by AUE echography has been strongly associated with the development and severity of atherosclerotic plaque in apoE-/- mice models[21, 24], and blinded AUE assessment of major vasculature has excellent validity with the severity of vascular disease and atherosclerosis. Our findings indicate that HCQ in low doses similar to those employed for chronic use in the human population has strong protective effects on the structural and functional aspects of vascular health as reflected by better preserved vascular wall thickness, and vascular flow indices and elasticity across multiple vascular beds.
In our study, HCQ failed to reduce the degree of inflammation as reflected by the serum levels of hsCRP among mice with or without CKD. Retrospective database analyses have suggested a possible beneficial role for HCQ on the lipid profile, with some suggesting an improvement in LDL and HDL values[37–39]. In our study, we did not demonstrate a benefit of HCQ on the conventional lipid profile. We also found no significant impact of HCQ on the degree of renal dysfunction among treated vs. control mice with CKD, indicating that the beneficial effect of HCQ was unrelated to improvement in renal function (Table 1). Thus, our results suggest that the beneficial actions of HCQ toward atherosclerosis occurs even in the absence of significant anti-inflammatory, renoprotective, or anti-lipidemic actions, and might be related to alternate mechanisms.
Analyses of various in vitro, in vivo, and human cohort data indicate that HCQ has many pleiotropic effects, e.g. reduction in oxidative stress, improvement in insulin sensitivity and metabolic syndrome[14–19, 22], improvement in vascular endothelial function with improved availability of eNOS activity, and inhibition of autophagy[40] with concerns for heightened maladaptive autophagy in endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells[41–43] in tissues with accelerated atherosclerosis, etc. Razani et al. in their metabolic studies also found that chloroquine, a precursor molecule of HCQ, inhibits atherosclerosis through a p53-dependent stress pathway[17]. More importantly, the reasons for worsening CVD and its refractoriness towards conventional therapies in the presence of uremic milieu are multifactorial and at present unknown. Thus, additional studies are needed to further define the factors associated with the worsening CVD with uremia and the potential mechanisms by which HCQ affords its beneficial effects on atherosclerosis in uremic milieu.
Although our study does not provide mechanistic insight, we believe it is clinically relevant because it proposes a therapy for CVD with a drug that has been in use for several decades, even in patients with advanced CKD and ESKD[44, 45]. This suggests a potential for evaluation of HCQ for cardiovascular events in CKD patients. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms through which HCQ confers its benefits.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Ms. Cindy Reid for technical writing assistance and Wen Xuerong, PhD for statistical assistance in preparation of the manuscript.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by South Central Veterans Administration Healthcare Network pilot project grant (VISN-16); and Gatorade research fund, University of Florida, DoM.
References
- 1. McCullough PA, Agrawal V, Danielewicz E, Abela GS. Accelerated atherosclerotic calcification and Monckeberg's sclerosis: A continuum of advanced vascular pathology in chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3(6):1585–698. 10.2215/CJN.01930408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu C. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(13):1296–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Williams ME, Lacson E Jr, Wang W, Lazarus JM, Hakim R. Glycemic control and extended hemodialysis survival in patients with diabetes mellitus: comparative results of traditional and time-dependent Cox model analyses. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010. 5(9):1595–601. 10.2215/CJN.09301209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Pfeffer MA, Burdmann EA, Chen CY, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Eckardt KU, et al. A trial of darbepoetin alfa in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(21):2019–32. 10.1056/NEJMoa0907845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Fellström BC, Jardine AG, Schmieder RE, Holdaas H, Bannister K, Beutler J, et al. Rosuvastatin and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1395–407. 10.1056/NEJMoa0810177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wanner C, Krane V, Winfried M, Olschewski M, Mann JFE, Ruf G, et al. Atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:238–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Besarab A, Bolton WK, Browne JK, Egrie JC, Nissenson AR, Okamoto DM, et al. The effects of normal as compared with low hematocrit values in patients with cardiac disease who are receiving hemodialysis and epoetin. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(9):584–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ivanovski O, Szumilak Dl, Nguyen-Khoa Tl, Nikolov IG, Joki N, Mothu N, et al. Effect of simvastatin in apolipoprotein E deficient mice with surgically induced chronic renal failure. J Urol. 2008;179(4):1631–6. 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Group FT, Chertow GM, Levin NW, Beck GJ, Depner TA, Eggers PW, et al. In-center hemodialysis six times per week versus three times per week. New Engl J Med. 2010;363(24):2287–300. 10.1056/NEJMoa1001593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Investigators ET, Chertow GM, Block GA, Correa-Rotter R, Drüeke TB, Floege J, et al. Effect of cinacalcet on cardiovascular disease in patients undergoing dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(26):2482–94. 10.1056/NEJMoa1205624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. United States Renal Data System 2012 Annual Data Report: Atlas of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the United States Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Schiffrin EL, Lipman ML, Mann JF. Chronic kidney disease: effects on the cardiovascular system. Circulation. 2007. 116(1):85–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Liu Y, Coresh J, Eustace JA, Longenecker JC, Jaar B, Fink NE, et al. Association between cholesterol level and mortality in dialysis patients: role of inflammation and malnutrition. JAMA. 2004;291(4):451–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Sisó A, Ramos-Casals M, Bové A, Brito-Zerón P, Soria N, Muñoz S, et al. Previous antimalarial therapy in patients diagnosed with lupus nephritis: Influence on outcomes and survival. Lupus. 2008;17(4):281–8. 10.1177/0961203307086503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lesiak A, Narbutt J, Sysa-Jedrzejowska A, Lukamowicz J, McCauliffe DP, Wózniacka A. Effect of chloroquine phosphate treatment on serum MMP-9 and TIMP-1 levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2010;19(6):683–8. 10.1177/0961203309356455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Schneider JG, Finck BN, Ren J, Standley KN, Takagi M, Maclean KH, et al. ATM-dependent suppression of stress signaling reduces vascular disease in metabolic syndrome. Cell Metab 2006;4(5):377–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Razani B, Feng C, Semenkovich CF. P53 is required for chloroquine-induced atheroprotection but not insulin sensitization. J Lipid Res. 2010;51(7):1738–46. 10.1194/jlr.M003681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Jang CH, Choi JH, Byun MS, Jue DM. Chloroquine inhibits production of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 from lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human monocytes/macrophages by different modes. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006;45(6):703–10. 10.1093/rheumatology/kei282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Picot S, Peyron F, Vuillez JP, Polack B, Ambroise-Thomas PC. Chloroquine inhibits tumor necrosis factor production by human macrophages in vitro. J Infect Dis. 1991;164(4):830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Gagnon RF, Ansari M. Development and progression of uremic changes in the mouse with surgically induced renal failure. Nephron. 1990;54(1):70–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Apostolov EO, Ray D, Savenka AV, Shah SV, Basnakian AG. Chronic uremia stimulates LDL carbamylation and atherosclerosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(11):1852–7 10.1681/ASN.2010040365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ruiz-Irastorza G, Egurbide M, Pijoan JI, Garmendia M, Villar I, Martinez-Berriotxoa A, et al. Effect of antimalarials on thrombosis and survival in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2006;15(9):577–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Wikström J, Grönros J, Bergström G, Gan L-m. Functional and morphologic imaging of coronary atherosclerosis in living mice using high-resolution color Doppler echocardiography and ultrasound biomicroscopy. J Amer Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(4):720–7. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Gan LM, Grönros J, Hägg U, Wikström J, Theodoropoulos C, Friberg P, et al. Non-invasive real-time imaging of atherosclerosis in mice using ultrasound biomicroscopy. Atherosclerosis. 2007;190(2):313–20. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.03.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Goff DC Jr., Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D'Agostino RB, Gibbons R, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(25 Suppl 2):S49–73. 10.1161/01.cir.0000437741.48606.98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in AdultsA Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25_PA). 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease2013 2013-10-07 00:00:00. 2949–3003 p. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 28. Filiopoulos V, Vlassopoulos D. Inflammatory syndrome in chronic kidney disease: pathogenesis and influence on outcomes. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2009;8(5):369–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Davignon J, Ganz P. Role of Endothelial Dysfunction in Atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2004;109(23 suppl 1):III-27–III-32. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000131515.03336.f8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ghigo D, Aldieri E, Todde R, Costamagna C, Garbarino G, Pescarmona G, et al. Chloroquine stimulates nitric oxide synthesis in murine, porcine, and human endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1998;102(3):596–605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Tawakol A, Muller J. Through the looking glass: an angioscopic view of the effect of statin therapy on coronary artery plaques. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(4):687–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Tawakol A, Castano AP, Anatelli F, Bashian G, Stern J, Zahra T, et al. Photosensitizer delivery to vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque: comparison of macrophage-targeted conjugate versus free chlorin(e6). J Biomed Opt. 2006;11(2):021008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Todorovic Z, Medic B, Basta-Jovanovic G, Radojevic Skodric S, Stojanovic R, Rovcanin B, et al. Acute pretreatment with chloroquine attenuates renal I/R injury in rats. PLoS One. 2014. 9(3):e92673 10.1371/journal.pone.0092673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Gómez-Guzmán M, Jiménez R, Romero M, Sánchez M, Zarzuelo MJ, Gómez-Morales M, et al. Chronic hydroxychloroquine improves endothelial dysfunction and protects kidney in a mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus. Hypertension. 2014;64(2):330–7. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03587 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Bengtsson C, Andersson SE, Edvinsson L, Edvinsson ML, Sturfelt G, Nived O. Effect of medication on microvascular vasodilatation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010;107(6):919–24. 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2010.00604.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Selzer F, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Fitzgerald S, Tracy R, Kuller L, Manzi S. Vascular stiffness in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Hypertension. 2001;37(4):1075–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Borba EF, Bonfá E. Longterm beneficial effect of chloroquine diphosphate on lipoprotein profile in lupus patients with and without steroid therapy. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(4):780–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ruiz-Irastorza G, Ramos-Casals M, Brito-Zeron P, Khamashta MA. Clinical efficacy and side effects of antimalarials in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(1):20–8. 10.1136/ard.2008.101766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Lorber M, Aviram M, Linn S, Scharf Y, Brook JG. Hypocholesterolaemia and abnormal high-density lipoprotein in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1985. 24(3):250–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Martinet W, De Meyer GY. Autophagy in atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2008;10(3):216–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Gustafsson ABGRA. Autophagy in ischemic heart disease. Circ Res. 2009;104(2):150–8. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.187427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Mei Y, Thompson MD, Cohen RA, Tong X. Autophagy and oxidative stress in cardiovascular diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014:pii: S0925-4439(14)00133-1. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.05.005 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Lavandero S, Troncoso R, Rothermel BA, W. M, Sadoshima J, Hill JA. Cardiovascular autophagy: Concepts, controversies, and perspectives. Autophagy. 2013;9(10):1455–66. 10.4161/auto.25969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Leung N, Shaikh A, Cosio FG, Griffin MD, Textor SC, Gloor JM, et al. The outcome of patients with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after successful kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(3):558–62. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02959.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Aronoff GR, Bennett WM, Berns JS, Brier ME, Kasbekar N, Mueller BA, et al. Drug Prescribing in Renal Failure: Dosing Guidelines for Adults and Children. 5th edition Philadelphia, PA: American College of Physicians; 2007. 272 p. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper.