Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Sep 29;5:14544. doi: 10.1038/srep14544

Identification of an iridium(III) complex with anti-bacterial and anti-cancer activity

Lihua Lu 1,*, Li-Juan Liu 2,*, Wei-chieh Chao 3,*, Hai-Jing Zhong 2, Modi Wang 1, Xiu-Ping Chen 2, Jin-Jian Lu 2, Ruei-nian Li 3,a, Dik-Lung Ma 1,b, Chung-Hang Leung 2,c
PMCID: PMC4586517  PMID: 26416333

Abstract

Group 9 transition metal complexes have been widely explored as therapeutic agents due to their unique geometry, their propensity to undergo ligand exchanges with biomolecules and their diverse steric and electronic properties. These metal complexes can offer distinct modes of action in living organisms compared to carbon-based molecules. In this study, we investigated the antimicrobial and anti-proliferative abilities of a series of cyclometallated iridium(III) complexes. The iridium(III) complex 1 inhibited the growth of S. aureus with MIC and MBC values of 3.60 and 7.19 μM, respectively, indicating its potent bactericidal activity. Moreover, complex 1 also exhibited cytotoxicity against a number of cancer cell lines, with particular potency against ovarian, cervical and melanoma cells. This cyclometallated iridium(III) complex is the first example of a substitutionally-inert, Group 9 organometallic compound utilized as a direct and selective inhibitor of S. aureus.


The design and synthesis of metal complexes for imaging and therapy have attracted considerable attention from inorganic medicinal chemists over the past decade1,2,3,4. Increasingly, transition metal complexes have been explored as therapeutic agents for treating human diseases due their prominent advantages. For example, the steric and electronic properties of metal complexes can be fine-tuned by modification of their auxiliary ligands. Moreover, metal complexes possess unique geometries for the attachment of ligands, and they can also undergo ligand exchange reactions with specific biomolecules5. Consequently, metal complexes can offer distinct modes of action compared to carbon-based molecules6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16.

With the global rise of antibiotic resistance and the lack of new antibiotics reaching the market, new antimicrobial drugs with novel mechanisms of action are desperately needed17. Complexes of copper(II)18, silver(I)19,20,21, ruthenium(II)22, bismuth(III)23 vanadium(IV)24, and iron(II)25, among other complexes26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36, have been reported to disrupt antibiotic-resistant biofilms, exert synergistic bactericidal activity with other biocides, inhibit metabolic pathways in a selective manner or to kill multidrug-resistant bacteria.

A number of mechanisms of metal-induced microbial activity have been extensively studied37. The first is the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidant depletion. Treatment of E. coli with exogenous hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) or agents that catalyse the generation of superoxide (O2•−) resulted in DNA damage and the inhibition of enzyme activities that are important for bacterial growth37. Moreover, bacterial and S. cerevisiae strains lacking ROS-scavenging enzymes or other cellular antioxidants showed altered sensitivity towards redox-active metals38. Alternatively, certain metals might disrupt cellular donor ligands that coordinate Fe, leading to the release of additional Fenton-active Fe into the bacterial cytoplasm resulting in increased ROS production. Oxidative stress in bacteria can also lead to the oxidation of cellular thiols, leading to the formation of protein disulphides and the depletion of antioxidant reserves such as glutathione in bacterial cells39.

Another interesting strategy is the use of “Trojan horse” compounds that trick bacteria into taking up toxic metals. These ions can be delivered to bacterial cells by conjugation to a siderophore such as desferrioxamine (DFO)40, enterochelin41 or protoporphyrin IX (PPIX)42. Notably, gallium nitrate (Ga(NO3)3), Ga-DFO and Ga-PPIX show broad-spectrum bactericidal activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria in vitro and in vivo of infection43,44.

Only limited examples of kinetically-inert Group 9 metal complexes have been reported as antibacterial and anticancer agents45,46,47. Recently, three cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes bearing dithiocarbamate derivatives have been reported to interact with calf thymus DNA and possess anti-bacterial activity48. The delocalization of the π-electrons over the chelate ring was proposed to increase the lipophilicity of the complexes and facilitate their penetration into bacterial cell membranes, thereby resulting in inhibition of bacterial growth. Highly hydrophobic Ir(III) complexes containing both Cp* and a C,N-chelating ligand have been validated their significant cytotoxic activity towards A2780 human ovarian cancer cells49. Additionally, an NHC iridium(I) complex with significant antiproliferative properties in vitro has been shown to target cytochrome c with simultaneous oxidation of Ir(I) to Ir(III)50. In this report, we describe the synthesis and biological evaluation of a substitutionally-inert, organometallic iridium(III) complex 1 (Fig. 1) that inhibits the growth of Staphylococcus aureus.

Figure 1. Chemical structures of complexes 15.

Figure 1

Results and Discussion

Synthesis

The iridium(III) complexes 1–4 and rhodium(III) complex 5 are kinetically-inert, organometallic complexes with a general structure [M(C^N)2(N^N)]+ (M = Ir or Rh). Complexes 1 and 2 contain a 5-amino-1, 10-phenathroline N^N ligand, while complexes 3–5 contain the bathophenanthroline N^N ligand. In regards to the C^N ligand, complexes 3 and 5 possess 2-phenylpyridine ligands, while complex 1 bears the related 2-(p-tolyl)pyridine ligand. Complexes 2 and 4 carry the bulkier 2-phenylquinoline and 1-isoquinoline C^N ligands, respectively.

The syntheses and characterization of the iridium(III) or rhodium(III) complexes 15 are described in the Methods section. The spectroscopic data of the complexes are presented in Table 1. Complexes 2 and 5 are novel whereas complexes 1 51, 3 52 and 4 53 have been previously described. All complexes were synthesized and tested as racemic mixtures of enantiomers.

Table 1. Photophysical properties of complexes 15.

Complex λem/nm UV/vis absorption λabs/nm (ε/dm3mol–1cm–1)
1 555 270 (2.15 × 105), 381 (2.47 × 104)[36]
2 590 274 (7.98 × 104), 354 (1.13 × 104)
3 587 270 (6.1 × 104), 337 (1.99 × 104)[37]
4 593 279 (2.0 × 105), 382 (1.56 × 104), 439 (6 × 103)[38]
5 No emission 284 (1.21 × 105), 366 (2.26 × 104)

Antibacterial activity

The anti-bacterial activity of the complexes 15 was investigated using a disk diffusion assay. In this assay, four different bacterial strains (Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Klebsiella pneumoniae) were plated on an agar dish, and disks soaked with solutions of the metal complexes (11.5 μM) or ampicillin were placed onto the dish. The antimicrobial activity of the metal complexes would be manifested as the absence of bacterial growth around the disk, due to diffusion of the compounds into the surrounding agar. After 24 h, the growth inhibition zones of the test strains were determined. Encouragingly, the results showed that racemic complex 1 (rac-1) exhibited selective anti-bacterial activity towards S. aureus, with an average inhibition zone of 15 mm (Fig. 2). On the other hand, the other metal complexes showed limited antibacterial activity.

Figure 2. Anti-bacterial activity of complexes 1–5 as determined by the disk diffusion assay.

Figure 2

(a) The anti-S. aureus activity of complexes 15. (b) The anti-E. coli activity of complexes 15. (c) The anti-E. faecalis activity of complexes 15. (d) The anti-K. pneumoniae activity of complexes 15. All complexes used are racemic mixture of enantiomers.

Determination of MIC and MBC values

We next determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of complex 1 against S. aureus by the broth dilution method. Briefly, S. aureus inoculum in Luria Bertain broth was incubated with serial dilutions of complex 1 at 37 °C for 24  h. The MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of complex 1 inhibiting visible bacterial growth. The results showed that the MIC of S. aureus grown with complex 1 was 3.60 μM (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Inhibition of the growth of S. aureus by racemic mixture of complex 1 as determined by the broth dilution method.

Figure 3

Results are representative of three independent experiments, and the complete data are shown in Table S2.

To determine the MBC (minimum bactericidal concentration), the agar dilution method was used. Briefly, S. aureus inoculum treated with different concentrations of complex 1 were taken aseptically from tubes that had not presented visible turbidity and plated onto agar. The MBC was considered as the lowest concentration of complex 1 that allowed less than 0.1% of the original inoculum treated with complex 1 to grow on the surface of the agar. The results showed that the MBC of S. aureus grown with complex 1 was 7.19 μM. To determine the nature of antibacterial effect of a compound, the MBC/MIC ratio is typically used54. When this ratio is lower than 4, the compound is considered as a bactericidal. On the other hand, if this ratio is higher than 4, the compound is considered to be bacteriostatic. As the MBC/MIC ratio of complex 1 is 2, complex 1 is considered to be bactericidal.

From these data, a brief structure-activity relationship analysis can be conducted. Complex 1 contains the 2-(p-tolyl)pyridine ligand C^N, which is relatively smaller compared to the quinoline or isoquinoline-based C^N ligands of complexes 2 and 4, respectively. This suggests that smaller C^N ligands may be beneficial for antimicrobial activity. Additionally, complex 1 also contains an amino substituent on the phenanthroline N^N ligand. The amino group may confer the necessary hydrophilic/hydrophobic balance for the complex to penetrate the thick peptidoglycan cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria such as S. aureus. While complex 2 contains the same 5-amino-1,10-phenanthroline N^N substituent as complex 1, its larger 2-phenylquinoline C^N ligand may have diminished its activity.

Interestingly, a slightly increased zone area was observed when the iridium(III) center of 3 was replaced with rhodium(III) (as in congener 5), suggesting the importance of the metal center in contributing to antibacterial activity. However, complexes 35, containing the relatively large bathophenanthroline N^N ligand, generally showed modest zone areas and were less active compared to complex 1. In particular, complexes 25 showed only very limited activity against S. aureus. Additionally, complexes 25 at a concentration of 50–60 μM were not able to inhibit bacterial growth in LB broth. These complexes might exhibit antibacterial activity at higher concentrations, but this would not be practical for clinical use. Taken together, these findings suggest that the presence of the relatively bulky N^N ligand detracts from antibacterial activity. We propose that the lipophilicity and/or structure of complex 1 might allow it to effectively pass through the hydrophobic interior of the bacterial cell membrane.

Partition Coefficients (log P)

The octanol-water partition coefficients (log P) for complex 1 was determined. Complex 1 showed a log P value of 0.629, indicating that it is slightly lipophilic and also satisfies Lipinski’s lipophilicity criterion (log P < 5) for drug likeness.

Evaluation of cell proliferation

Lipophilicity correlates with cytotoxic potency. Therefore, the cytotoxicity of complex 1 towards different cell lines was evaluated. By using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, the in vitro cytotoxicity of complex 1 was evaluated in a panel of human cell lines, including ovarian cancer A2780 and SKOV3 cells, hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells, cervical adenocarcinoma HeLa cells, and malignant melanoma A375 and A2058 cells. Cells were exposed to complex 1 in concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 10 μM and cellular proliferation was assessed after 72 h. The results showed that complex 1 inhibited cellular proliferation of A2780, HepG2, SKOV3, HeLa, A375, and A2058 cells in a dose-dependent manner with IC50 values of 7.23 ± 1.30, 17.0 ± 1.39, 1.77 ± 1.70, 1.68 ± 1.29, 1.55 ± 0.15 and 1.24 ± 0.31 μM, respectively (Fig. 4). The results indicate that the cytotoxic effect of complex 1 is cell type-dependent. Complex 1 selectively inhibits growth of ovarian, cervical and melanoma cells, but not hepatocarcinoma cells.

Figure 4. Cell viability of racemic mixture of complex 1 against A2780, HepG2, SKOV3, HeLa, A375 and A2058 cells as determined by the MTT assay.

Figure 4

Error bars represent the standard deviations of the results from three independent experiments.

Stability of complex 1

The most potent complex 1 was stable in H2O/acetonitrile (400:1) solution at 298 K for at least 24 h as revealed by UV-Vis spectroscopy. No significant change in absorption spectrum of complex 1 was observed over 24 h (Fig. 5). The result indicates that complex 1 is stable at room temperature.

Figure 5. UV/Vis absorption of 1 (2.5 μM) in H2O/acetonitrile (400:1) at t= 0 h and after incubation for 0, 1, 2, 4, 12, and 24 h at 298 K.

Figure 5

Methods

Materials and cell lines

All chemicals, unless specified, were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, HepG2, SKOV3, HeLa, A375 and A2058 were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). A2780, HepG2, SKOV3, HeLa, A375 and A2058 cells were routinely grown in suspension in 90% RPMI-1640 containing L-glutamine (2 nM) or DMEM, antibiotics (100 IU penicillin/mL, 100 μg streptomycin/mL) and supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS). The cells were maintained at a cell density of 0.2–1 × 106 cells/mL in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere at 37 °C.

General experimental

Mass spectrometry was performed at the Mass Spectroscopy Unit at the Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong (China). Melting points were determined using a Gallenkamp melting apparatus and are uncorrected. Deuterated solvents for NMR purposes were obtained from Armar and used as received.

1H and 13C NMR were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer operating at 400 MHz (1H) and 100 MHz (13C). 1H and 13C chemical shifts were referenced internally to solvent shift (acetone-d6: 1H δ 2.05, 13C δ 29.8, 206.1). Chemical shifts (δ) are quoted in ppm, the downfield direction being defined as positive. Uncertainties in chemical shifts are typically ±0.01 ppm for 1H and ±0.05 for 13C. Coupling constants are typically ±0.1 Hz for 1H-1H and ±0.5 Hz for 1H-13C couplings. The following abbreviations are used for convenience in reporting the multiplicity of NMR resonances: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; m, multiplet. All NMR data was acquired and processed using standard Bruker software (Topspin).

Photophysical measurement

Emission spectra and lifetime measurements for complex 1 were performed according to the previously described method53.

Synthesis

These complexes were synthesized using a modified literature method55. MCl3H2O was heated to 150 °C with 2.2 equivalents of C^N ligand in 3:1 methoxymethanol and deionized water under a nitrogen atmosphere for 12 h. The product was filtered off and washed with ether (3 × 50 mL) and then with deionized water (3 × 50 mL). A suspension of [M2(C^N)4Cl2] (0.2 mmol) and the N^N ligand (0.44 mmol) in a mixture of dichloromethane:methanol (1:1, 20 mL) was refluxed overnight under a nitrogen atmosphere. The resulting solution was then allowed to cool to room temperature, and filtered to remove unreacted cyclometallated dimer. To the filtrate, a solution of ammonium hexafluorophosphate (0.5 g in 5 mL methanol) was added and the filtrate was reduced in volume by rotary evaporation until precipitation of the crude product occurred. The precipitate was then filtered and washed with several portions of water (2 × 50 mL) followed by diethyl ether (2 × 50 mL). The product was recrystallized by acetonitrile:diethyl ether vapor diffusion to yield the titled compound. All complexes were characterized by 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and elemental analysis.

Complex 1

Reported51.

Complex 2

Yield: 61%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, Acetone-d6) δ 9.22 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 9.12 (s, 1H), 9.06 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.98 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 8.94 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 8.59 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 8.52 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 8.34 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.31-8.25 (m, 2H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.34-7.25 (m, 6H), 6.93 (dd, J = 6.0 Hz, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 6.70 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, Acetone-d6) δ 171.4, 152.6, 152.1, 149.4, 148.6, 148.4, 147.2, 147.1, 145.3, 144.5, 141.9, 141.1, 141.0, 136.1, 135.6, 135.5, 134.1, 133.8, 131.5, 131.4, 131.3, 130.1, 130.0, 128.6, 128.3, 128.2, 127.6, 127.5, 127.3, 126.4, 125.3, 125.2, 124.7, 123.8, 123.7, 119.0, 118.9, 103.7. HRMS: Calcd. for C42H29IrN5[M–PF6]+: 796.2052 Found: 796.2091. Anal. (C42H29N5IrPF6+2H2O): C, H, N: calcd. 51.64, 3.40, 7.17, found: 51.65, 3.15, 7.41. The elemental analysis result (Figure S1) was shown in the supporting information.

Complex 3

Reported52.

Complex 4

Reported53.

Complex 5

Yield: 58%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, Acetone-d6) δ 8.58 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H), 8.33-8.30 (m, 4H), 8.06-8.02 (m, 6H), 7.80 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 2H), 7.70-7.66 (m, 10H), 7.19 (t, J = 3.6 Hz, 2H), 7.09 (dd, J = 6.0 Hz, 1.2 Hz, 4H), 6.52 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, Acetone-d6) δ 164.6, 164.3, 153.7, 150.0, 148.9, 145.8, 139.3, 137.4, 135.5, 133.4, 129.8, 129.6, 129.4, 129.0, 128.1, 126.9, 126.8, 125.7, 124.1, 123.1, 121.4; HRMS: Calcd. for C46H32RhN4[M–PF6]+: 743.1682 Found: 743.2193. Anal. (C46H32N4RhPF6+0.5H2O): C, H, N: calcd. 61.55, 3.71, 6.24, found: 61.51, 3.66, 6.28. The elemental analysis result (Figure S2) was shown in the supporting information.

Disk diffusion susceptibility test

The disk diffusion method was used to determine sensitivity of bacteria to complexes 15. S. aureus, E. faecalis, E. coli and K. pneumoniae direct colony suspensions were prepared in Luria Bertain broth for less than 18 h. The turbidity of four bacterial suspensions were standardized to match 1.0 × 108  UFC/mL (or 0.5 McFarland turbidity units). A sterile swab dipped in fresh bacterial suspensions was inoculated to the entire surface of Mueller-Hinton agar and the inoculum was distributed evenly. The plates were incubated with standardizing inoculum suspension for 15 min at room temperature. 10 μL complexes 15 (11.5 μM) or ampicillin (28 μM) were impregnated on sterile 6 mm paper disks for 15 min. Subsequently, the paper disks were aseptically placed on and pressed down firmly to the inoculated plates. Plates were incubated for 24 h in a 37 °C incubator. After the incubation, the inhibition zones were measured. Ampicillin was used as a positive control for bacterial inhibition. The presence or absence of growth around the disks was a measure of the ability of complexes 15 to inhibit growth of bacterial. All experiments were done in triplicate.

MIC and MBC testing

Complex 1 was examined for its antimicrobial activity against S. aureus. The MIC was estimated by the broth dilution method in Luria Bertain broth using the standardized method56,57,58,59,60. Briefly, serial dilutions of complex 1 were prepared in distilled water with concentrations ranging from 1.8 to 57.6 μM. 1 mL of an S. aureus inoculum (1 × 108 UFC/mL) and 0.1 mL of serially diluted complex 1 were added to 2.9 mL of Luria Bertain broth. Controls without complex 1 were also prepared. After 24 h of incubation at 37 °C under agitation in hermetic tubes, the MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of complex 1 that inhibited visible bacterial growth. The experiments were performed in triplicate. The complete data are shown in Table S2 in the Supplementary Information.

To determine the MBC, 10 μL of bacterial inoculum treated with different concentrations of complex 1 was taken aseptically from tubes that had not presented visible turbidity and was plated onto Mueller-Hinton agar. The MBC was considered as the lowest concentration of complex 1 that allowed less than 0.1% of the original inoculum treated with complex 1 to grow on the surface of the Mueller-Hinton agar. The experiments were performed in triplicate. The complete data are shown in Table S2 in the Supplementary Information.

To determine the nature of antibacterial effect of complex 1, the MBC/MIC ratio was used; when the ratio was lower than 4, complex 1 was considered as a bactericidal complex 1 and when the ratio was higher than 4, it was considered as a bacteriostatic complex 1.

Log P Determination

This experiment was carried out according to a reported method and the partitions were detected by HPLC61. The partition coefficients of the Ir(III) complexes were calculated using the equation log P = log([Ir]WSO/[Ir]OSW), where [Ir]WSO means the concentration of Ir(III) complex dissolved in octanol-saturated water (WSO), and [Ir]OSW means the concentration of Ir(III) complex dissolved in water-saturated octanol (OSW).

Cell cytotoxicity

Complex 1 was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) at a stock concentration of 10 mM and serially diluted with low FBS medium to the working concentrations. The evaluation of cells proliferation was conducted using MTT assay. In brief, the cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 8 × 104 cells/mL in complete medium for overnight. Serial dilution of complex 1 in low FBS medium was then added to the wells. After 72 h, 20 μL MTT (5 mg/mL) was added to each well. The plates were then incubated for an additional 4 h at 37 °C while avoiding direct light. Subsequently, the medium in each well was removed and 100 μL DMSO was added to each well. The plates were shaken gently for 10 min at room temperature to completely dissolve the purple formazan in the mitochondria of living cells. The color intensity was measured at 570 nm using a SpectraMax M5 microplate reader (Molecular Devices).

Conclusion

In summary, we have identified a metal-based complex that selectively inhibited the growth of S. aureus. The iridium(III) or rhodium(III) complexes 15 were synthesized by the reaction of MClnH2O with the C^N ligand to yield the dimeric compound [M2(C^N)4Cl2], which was treated with the corresponding N^N ligand to give the targeted complexes. Complexes 2 and 5 are novel and have been characterized for the first time.

Complex rac-1 inhibited the growth of S. aureus with MIC and MBC values of 3.60 and 7.19 μM. As the MBC/MIC ratio of complex 1 is approximately 2, complex 1 is considered to be bactericidal. Moreover, complex 1 also exhibited cytotoxicity against a number of cancer cells, with particular potency against ovarian, cervical and melanoma cells but not hepatocarcinoma cells, suggesting that its cytotoxic activity was cell type-dependent. To our knowledge, this cyclometallated iridium(III) complex is the first example of a substitutionally-inert, Group 9 organometallic compound utilized as a direct inhibitor of S. aureus.

We anticipate that cyclometallated iridium(III) complex 1 may serve as a useful scaffold for the further development of highly potent inhibitors of S. aureus as potential anti-bacterial agents and anti-cancer agents.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Lu, L. et al. Identification of an iridium(III) complex with anti-bacterial and anti-cancer activity. Sci. Rep. 5, 14544; doi: 10.1038/srep14544 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep14544-s1.doc (96.5KB, doc)

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Hong Kong Baptist University (FRG2/14-15/004), Centre for Cancer and Inflammation Research, School of Chinese Medicine (CCIR-SCM, HKBU), the Health and Medical Research Fund (HMRF/13121482 and HMRF/14130522), the Research Grants Council (HKBU/201811, HKBU/204612, and HKBU/201913), the French National Research Agency/Research Grants Council Joint Research Scheme (A-HKBU201/12-Oligoswitch), Interdisciplinary Research Matching Scheme (RC-IRMS/14-15/06), State Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis Research Grant (SKLP-14-15-P001), the Science and Technology Development Fund, Macao SAR (103/2012/A3 and 098/2014/A2) and the University of Macau (MYRG091(Y3-L2)-ICMS12-LCH, MYRG2015-00137-ICMS-QRCM and MRG023/LCH/2013/ICMS).

Footnotes

Author Contributions L.L., L.J.L. and W.c.C. contributed equally to the work. L.L. and M.W. performed the synthesis of metal complexes, photophysical measurement and Log P determination. L.J.L. and H.J.Z. contributed to the cell cytotoxicity experiment. W.c.C. conducted the antibacterial experiments. R.n.L., D.L.M. and C.H.L. designed the experiments and supervised the whole research. All the authors contributed to the results analysis and discussion.

References

  1. Frezza M. et al. Novel metals and metal complexes as platforms for cancer therapy. Curr. Pharm. Des. 16, 1813–1825 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Howerton B. S., Heidary D. K. & Glazer E. C. Strained ruthenium complexes are potent light-activated anticancer agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 8324–8327 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Leung C.-H., Zhong H.-J., Chan D. S.-H. & Ma D.-L. Bioactive iridium and rhodium complexes as therapeutic agents. Coord. Chem. Rev. 257, 1764–1776 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  4. Knoll J. D. & Turro C. Control and utilization of ruthenium and rhodium metal complex excited states for photoactivated cancer therapy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 282–283, 110–126 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ma D.-L., He H.-Z., Leung K.-H., Chan D. S.-H. & Leung C.-H. Bioactive luminescent transition-metal complexes for biomedical applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 7666–7682 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Heffern M. C., Yamamoto N., Holbrook R. J., Eckermann A. L. & Meade T. J. Cobalt derivatives as promising therapeutic agents. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 17, 189–196 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu L.-J. et al. An iridium(III) complex inhibits JMJD2 activities and acts as a potential epigenetic modulator. J. Med. Chem. 58, 6697–6703 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wong C.-Y. et al. Dual Inhibition and Monitoring of Beta-Amyloid Fibrillation by a Luminescent Iridium(III) Complex. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 12, 439–444 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leung C.-H., Lin S., Zhong H.-J. & Ma D.-L. Metal complexes as potential modulators of inflammatory and autoimmune responses. Chem. Sci. 6, 871–884 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Leung C.-H. et al. A metal-based tumour necrosis factor-alpha converting enzyme inhibitor. Chem. Commun. 51, 3973–3976 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ma D.-L. et al. Antagonizing STAT3 Dimerization with a Rhodium(III) Complex. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 9178–9182 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leung C.-H. et al. Inhibition of Janus kinase 2 by cyclometalated rhodium complexes. Medchem. comm 3, 696–698 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhong H.-J., Yang H., Chan DS.-H., Leung C.-H., Wang H.-M. & Ma D.-L. A metal-based inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme. Plos One 7, (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Leung C.-H. et al. A metal-based inhibitor of tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 9010–9014 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu J., Sun RW.-Y., Leung C.-H., Lok C.-N. & Che C.-M. Inhibition of TNF-alpha stimulated nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) activation by cyclometalated platinum(II) complexes. Chem. Commun. 48, 230–232 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang P. et al. Specific blocking of CREB/DNA binding by cyclometalated platinum(II) complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 2554–2558 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Spellberg B. et al. Combating antimicrobial resistance: policy recommendations to save lives. Clin. Infect. Dis. 52 Suppl 5, S397–428 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chetana P. R. et al. Novel ligand 1-benzyl-3-(4-ethyl-pyridin-2-Yl)-thiourea and Cu(I) complexes: DNA interaction, antibacterial and thermal studies. IJPSDR 21, 355–363 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  19. Bormio N. J. H., De Paiva R. E. F., Cuin A., Lustri W. R. & Corbi P. P. Silver complexes with sulfathiazole and sulfamethoxazole: Synthesis, spectroscopic characterization, crystal structure and antibacterial assays. Polyhedron 85, 437–444 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  20. Sabounchei S. J. et al. New chlorine bridged binuclear silver(I) complexes of bidentate phosphorus ylides: Synthesis, spectroscopy, theoretical and anti-bacterial studies. Polyhedron 85, 652–664 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  21. Gholivand K., Molaei F., Oroujzadeh N., Mobasseri R. & Naderi-Manesh H. Two novel Ag(I) complexes of N-nicotinyl phosphoric triamide derivatives: Synthesis, X-ray crystal structure and in vitro antibacterial and cytotoxicity studies. Inorganica Chim. Acta 423, 107–116 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  22. Yata P. K. et al. Study of DNA light switch Ru(II) complexes: synthesis, characterization, photocleavage and antimicrobial activity. J. Fluoresc. 22, 835–847 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pathak A., Blair V. L., Ferrero R. L., Mehring M. & Andrews P. C. Bismuth(III) benzohydroxamates: powerful anti-bacterial activity against Helicobacter pylori and hydrolysis to a unique Bi34 oxido-cluster [Bi34O22(BHA)22(H-BHA)14(DMSO)6]. Chem. Commun. 50, 15232–15234 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Reddy G. N. R., Kondaiah S., Setty K. N., Rao R. M. & Ramulu J. S. Synthesis, structural characterization and anti-bacterial activity of some novel schiff base ligand and their vanadium (IV) metal complexes. OJC 28, 1673–1683 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  25. Jain S., Jain N. K. & Pitre K. S. Bio-inorganic studies on the Fe(II) sparfloxacin complex. Met-Based Drugs 9, 1–8 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kizilcikli I. et al. Antimicrobial activity of a series of thiosemicarbazones and their Zn(II) and Pd(II) complexes. Folia Microbiol. (Praha) 52, 15–25 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nair M. S. & Joseyphus R. S. Synthesis and characterization of Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) complexes of tridentate Schiff base derived from vanillin and DL-alpha-aminobutyric acid. Spectrochim. Acta. A. Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 70, 749–753 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kantouch A. & El-Sayed A. A. Polyvinyl pyridine metal complex as permanent antimicrobial finishing for viscose fabric. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 43, 451–455 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pandurangan K., Gallagher S., Morgan G. G., Muller-Bunz H. & Paradisi F. Structure and antibacterial activity of the silver(I) complex of 2-aminophenoxazine-3-one. Metallomics 2, 530–534 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Reddy G. N. R., Kondaiah S., Babu P. & Kumar K. R. Synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial activity of the Schiff Base derived from P-toluic hydrazide and 2-hydroxy-4-methoxy acetophenone (HMAPPTH Ligand) and their Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and Cu(II) complexes. JOAC 2, 415–425 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  31. Lemire J. A., Harrison J. J. & Turner R. J. Antimicrobial activity of metals: mechanisms, molecular targets and applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11, 371–384 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pandrala M. et al. Chlorido-containing ruthenium(II) and iridium(III) complexes as antimicrobial agents. Dalton Trans. 42, 4686–4694 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Subhan M. A., Alam K., Rahaman M. S., Rahman M. A. & Awal M. R. Synthesis and characterization of metal complexes containing curcumin (C21H20O6) and study of their anti-microbial activities and DNA binding. J. Sci. Res. 6, 97–109 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  34. Prasanthi G. Synthesis, characterization and anti-bacterial evaluation of metal complexes of 2-substituted quinazolin-4(3H)-one oxime derivatives. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 5, 29–31 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  35. Bansod N. H., Chaudhari G. N., Thihale M. S. & Patil S. D. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of new complexes of benzothiazole derivatives. Der. Pharma. Chemica. 5, 144–148 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  36. Al-Rubaie A. Z. et al. Synthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity of some new ferrocenyl selenazoles and 3,5-diferrocenyl-1,2,4-selenadiazole. J. Organomet. Chem. 774, 43–47 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  37. Lemire J. A., Harrison J. J. & Turner R. J. Antimicrobial activity of metals: mechanisms, molecular targets and applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11, 371–384 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sumner E. R. et al. Oxidative protein damage causes chromium toxicity in yeast. Microbiology 151, 1939–1948 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Helbig K., Grosse C. & Nies D. H. Cadmium toxicity in glutathione mutants of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 190, 5439–5454 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Banin E. et al. The potential of desferrioxamine-gallium as an anti-Pseudomonas therapeutic agent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16761–16766 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rogers H. J., Woods V. E. & Synge C. Antibacterial effect of the scandium and indium complexes of enterochelin on Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Microbiol. 128, 2389–2394 (1982). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Stojiljkovic I., Kumar V. & Srinivasan N. Non-iron metalloporphyrins: potent antibacterial compounds that exploit haem/Hb uptake systems of pathogenic bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 31, 429–442 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Olakanmi O. et al. Gallium disrupts iron uptake by intracellular and extracellular Francisella strains and exhibits therapeutic efficacy in a murine pulmonary infection model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54, 244–253 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Banin E. et al. The potential of desferrioxamine-gallium as an anti-Pseudomonas therapeutic agent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16761–16766 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Falzone N., Bohm L., Swarts J. C. & Van Rensburg C. E. Radiosensitization of CHO cells by two novel rhodium complexes under oxic and hypoxic conditions. Anticancer Res. 26, 147–152 (2006). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rajput J. et al. Synthesis, characterization and cytotoxicity of some palladium(II), platinum(II), rhodium(I) and iridium(I) complexes of ferrocenylpyridine and related ligands. Crystal and molecular structure of trans-dichlorobis(3-ferrocenylpyridine)palladium(II). J. Organomet. Chem. 689, 1553–1568 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  47. Simpson P. V., Schmidt C., Ott I., Bruhn H. & Schatzschneider U. Synthesis, Cellular Uptake and Biological Activity Against Pathogenic Microorganisms and Cancer Cells of Rhodium and Iridium N-Heterocyclic Carbene Complexes Bearing Charged Substituents. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 5547–5554 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  48. Mukherjee T. et al. Synthesis, characterization, interactions with DNA and bovine serum albumin (BSA), and antibacterial activity of cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes containing dithiocarbamate derivatives. J. Coord. Chem. 67, 2643–2660 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  49. Liu Z. et al. Contrasting Reactivity and Cancer Cell Cytotoxicity of Isoelectronic Organometallic Iridium(III) Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 50, 5777–5783 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Gothe Y., Marzo T., Messori L. & Metzler-Nolte N. Cytotoxic activity and protein binding through an unusual oxidative mechanism by an iridium(i)-NHC complex. Chem. Commun. 51, 3151–3153 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lo K. K. et al. New luminescent cyclometalated iridium(III) diimine complexes as biological labeling reagents. Inorg. Chem. 42, 6886–6897 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Goldsmith J. I., Hudson W. R., Lowry M. S., Anderson T. H. & Bernhard S. Discovery and high-throughput screening of heteroleptic iridium complexes for photoinduced hydrogen production. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 7502–7510 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lu L. et al. Detection of nicking endonuclease activity using a G-quadruplex-selective luminescent switch-on probe. Chem. Sci. 5, 4561–4568 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  54. Pankey G. A. & Sabath L. D. Clinical relevance of bacteriostatic versus bactericidal mechanisms of action in the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38, 864–870 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Marmion C. J. et al. Combating Cancer with Precious Metals - A Multi-Functional Approach Towards Developing Novel Anti-Cancer Agents. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 19, S463–S463 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  56. Cheng M., Huang J. X., Ramu S., Butler M. S. & Cooper M. A. Ramoplanin at bactericidal concentrations induces bacterial membrane depolarization in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 6819–6827 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Dorrani M. et al. TXA497 as a topical antibacterial agent: Comparative antistaphylococcal, skin deposition, and skin permeation studies with mupirocin. Int. J. Pharm. 476, 199–204 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Louie A. et al. Pharmacodynamic evaluation of the activities of six parenteral vancomycin products available in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 622–632 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Oh D. et al. Antibacterial activities of amphiphilic cyclic cell-penetrating peptides against multidrug-resistant pathogens. Mol. Pharm. 11, 3528–3536 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Li N. et al. PA-1, a novel synthesized pyrrolizidine alkaloid, inhibits the growth of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus by damaging the cell membrane. J. Antibiot. 67, 689–696 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Novohradsky V. et al. Mechanism of cellular accumulation of an iridium(III) pentamethylcyclopentadienyl anticancer complex containing a C,N-chelating ligand. Metallomics 6, 682–690 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep14544-s1.doc (96.5KB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES