Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1973 Sep;35(9):970–976. doi: 10.1136/hrt.35.9.970

Clinical significance of positive inotropic action of digoxin in patients with left ventricular disease.

C Davidson, D Gibson
PMCID: PMC458736  PMID: 4741924

Full text

PDF
970

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beiser G. D., Epstein S. E., Goldstein R. E., Stampfer M., Braunwald E. Comparison of the peak inotropic effects of a catecholamine and a digitalis glycoside in the intact canine heart. Circulation. 1970 Nov;42(5):805–813. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.42.5.805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Crouchman M., Gibson D., Hamer J. Actions of beta-adrenergic blocking drugs assessed in patients with aortic Starr-Ewards prostheses. Br Heart J. 1972 Sep;34(9):963–963. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Deutscher R. N., Harrison D. C., Godlman R. H. The relation between myocardial 3 H-digoxin concentration and its hemodynamic effects. Am J Cardiol. 1972 Jan;29(1):47–55. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(72)90414-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gibson D. G., Broder G., Sowton E. Effect of varying pulse interval in atrial fibrillation on left ventricular function in man. Br Heart J. 1971 May;33(3):388–393. doi: 10.1136/hrt.33.3.388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibson D. G., Broder G., Sowton E. Phonocardiographic method of assessing changes in left ventricular function after Starr-Edwards replacement of aortic valve. Br Heart J. 1970 Mar;32(2):142–148. doi: 10.1136/hrt.32.2.142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gunnar R. M., Loeb H. S., Pietras R. J., Tobin J. R., Jr Ineffectiveness of isoproterenol in shock due to acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1967 Dec 25;202(13):1124–1128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. King A. J., Taylor D. E. The inotropic action of paired pulse stimulation in the normal and failing heart: an experimental study. Cardiovasc Res. 1968 Apr;2(2):122–129. doi: 10.1093/cvr/2.2.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. MASON D. T., BRAUNWALD E. STUDIES ON DIGITALIS. X. EFFECTS OF OUABAIN ON FOREARM VASCULAR RESISTANCE AND VENOUS TONE IN NORMAL SUBJECTS AND IN PATIENTS IN HEART FAILURE. J Clin Invest. 1964 Mar;43:532–543. doi: 10.1172/JCI104939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mason D. T., Braunwald E. STUDIES ON DIGITALIS. IX. EFFECTS OF OUABAIN ON THE NONFAILING HUMAN HEART. J Clin Invest. 1963 Jul;42(7):1105–1111. doi: 10.1172/JCI104796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shapiro W., Narahara K., Taubert K. Relationship of plasma digitoxin and digoxin to cardiac response following intravenous digitalization in man. Circulation. 1970 Dec;42(6):1065–1072. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.42.6.1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Starr I., Luchi R. J. Blind study on the action of digitoxin on elderly women. Am Heart J. 1969 Dec;78(6):740–751. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(69)90440-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Weissler A. M., Schoenfeld C. D. Effect of digitalis on systolic time intervals in heart failure. Am J Med Sci. 1970 Jan;259(1):4–20. doi: 10.1097/00000441-197001000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES