Abstract
Seed-specific expression of a rice TPP in maize promotes yield in the field.
Nearly 20 years ago, company scientists attempted to induce trehalose biosynthesis in plants via the expression of microbial genes encoding trehalose-6-phosphate synthase (TPS) and trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase (TPP; Goddijn et al., 1997). The trehalose biosynthetic pathway condenses Glc-6-P and UDP-Glc into a molecule of UDP and trehalose 6-phosphate (T6P), which is subsequently dephosphorylated to form trehalose and inorganic phosphate (Fig. 1A). At the time, the aim was to overproduce the protein structure-stabilizing agent trehalose in plants and to study the protective effects of trehalose accumulation on plant performance under stress. At about the same time, it was realized that the trehalose biosynthetic pathway is present in all plants, not only in resurrection plants such as Selaginella lepidophylla, where it was first noticed in high abundance. ESTs (copy DNAs) and genome-sequencing projects uncovered the presence of extensive TPS and TPP gene families in plants, the function of which was (and still is) unclear (Vandesteene et al., 2012). Unexpectedly, overexpression of trehalose biosynthetic genes in plants produced detrimental phenotypes that could be linked to the accumulation of the biosynthetic intermediate T6P (Schluepmann et al., 2004). Further studies showed T6P to be a powerful signaling metabolite that controls carbohydrate metabolism and that is essential for plant growth and reproduction (van Dijken et al., 2004; Wahl et al., 2013).
Figure 1.
A, The trehalose biosynthetic pathway in plants. TPS converts Glc-6-P and UDP-Glc to UDP and T6P, which can be dephosphorylated to trehalose by TPP. Pi, Inorganic phosphate. B, Model explaining the key function of T6P in balancing growth and reproduction with resource availability. Suc stimulates T6P accumulation, thereby inhibiting SnRK1 and allowing growth. Low sugar promotes T6P conversion to trehalose by TPP, which signals resource sequestration in sinks, probably mediated by SnRK1. SnRK1 phosphorylates and activates C/S1 bZIP transcription factors that induce TPP gene expression, potentially creating a feed-forward loop for SnRK1 activation. C/S1 bZIPs are likely to have a function in promoting resource flow to sinks. T6P levels and SnRK1 activities are indicated by font sizes.
Suc specifically induces T6P accumulation, which seems to function as a signaling intermediate for reporting the cellular Suc status (Lunn et al., 2006; Yadav et al., 2014). T6P somehow operates as a licensing factor that allows sugar utilization for growth. Already early on, it was evident that the powerful regulatory effects of T6P on metabolism held potential for manipulating carbon partitioning and plant yield. Now, research by scientists from Syngenta and Rothamsted Research, reported by Nuccio et al. (2015) in Nature Biotechnology, shows that maize (Zea mays) yield stability can be significantly increased by the expression of the rice (Oryza sativa) OsTPP1 gene in developing ears (female reproductive organs). In multiyear and multilocation field trials and greenhouse experiments, it was found that the OsTPP1 transgene substantially improved grain yield under normal growth conditions but significantly more so when plants were exposed to mild drought stress, particularly at the highly susceptible flowering stage. Selection of the rice OsMADS6 promoter that targets the expression of OsTPP1 to specific cells of the developing female floret was key to the success the project. In rice, the OsMADS6 promoter regulates floral organ and meristem identities and endosperm nutrient accumulation. By contrast, the related OsMADS13 promoter, which in maize ears shows a more restricted expression pattern with lower expression in the vasculature, had detrimental effects on yield. This provides an excellent demonstration that spatiotemporal regulation of a transgene can significantly impact phenotypic outcome.
In ear spikelets of OsTPP1-expressing maize transgenics (OsMads6-Tpp1), lower T6P and increased Suc levels were observed compared with nontransgenic plants, suggesting an improved sink function of the reproductive tissues. The OsMads6-Tpp1 phenotypes include increased kernel number and weight as well as an increased harvest index. These qualities were observed with multiple independent transgenic events, at several field sites in different years, and with high penetrance and expressivity. Likely, in the developing ears, reduced T6P levels somehow signal increased sink activity, allowing the emergence of more and bigger kernels.
Previous research findings suggest that T6P inhibits Sucrose nonfermenting1-Related Kinase1 (SnRK1; Zhang et al., 2009; Nunes et al., 2013), a protein kinase that responds to the cellular metabolic status and that is a central regulator of metabolism in all eukaryotic organisms. In this model (Fig. 1B), increased SnRK1 activity and its downstream effectors then deliver the sink signal. The C/S1 subgroup of plant basic region-leucine zipper (bZIP) motif transcription factor proteins are among the SnRK1 targets, and interestingly, overexpression of the Arabidopsis C/S1 group member bZIP11 in Arabidopsis was found to induce TPP gene expression and to increase the sugar content of such overexpressing plants (Ma et al., 2011).
The molecular and genetic underpinnings of this T6P-C/S1 bZIP-SnRK1 regulatory module have been presented (O’Hara et al., 2013; Lunn et al., 2014), but the molecular details and mode of action need further investigation. Currently, no solid molecular explanation is available for the enhanced sink function of OsMads6-Tpp1-expressing maize ears. As mentioned above, T6P somehow licenses sugar utilization and is essential for growth. Therefore, T6P appears to be a balancing signal that connects cellular sink activity (low T6P) with cellular growth (high T6P).
Irrespective of the precise mechanism involved, the impressive TPP gene-to-field study presented by Nuccio et al. (2015) provides the first example of effective spatial and temporal regulation of a nutrient-sensing system that provides enhanced yield stability under drought in a major crop species.
Acknowledgments
I thank Julia Bailey-Serres for comments made on the article and figure.
Glossary
- T6P
trehalose 6-phosphate
References
- Goddijn OJ, Verwoerd TC, Voogd E, Krutwagen RW, de Graaf PT, van Dun K, Poels J, Ponstein AS, Damm B, Pen J (1997) Inhibition of trehalase activity enhances trehalose accumulation in transgenic plants. Plant Physiol 113: 181–190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lunn JE, Delorge I, Figueroa CM, Van Dijck P, Stitt M (2014) Trehalose metabolism in plants. Plant J 79: 544–567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lunn JE, Feil R, Hendriks JH, Gibon Y, Morcuende R, Osuna D, Scheible WR, Carillo P, Hajirezaei MR, Stitt M (2006) Sugar-induced increases in trehalose 6-phosphate are correlated with redox activation of ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase and higher rates of starch synthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem J 397: 139–148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma J, Hanssen M, Lundgren K, Hernández L, Delatte T, Ehlert A, Liu CM, Schluepmann H, Dröge-Laser W, Moritz T, et al. (2011) The sucrose-regulated Arabidopsis transcription factor bZIP11 reprograms metabolism and regulates trehalose metabolism. New Phytol 191: 733–745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nuccio ML, Wu J, Mowers R, Zhou H, Meghji M, Primavesi LF, Paul MJ, Chen X, Gao Y, Haque E, et al. (2015) Expression of trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase in maize ears improves yield in well-watered and drought conditions. Nat Biotechnol 33: 862–874 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nunes C, Primavesi LF, Patel MK, Martinez-Barajas E, Powers SJ, Sagar R, Fevereiro PS, Davis BG, Paul MJ (2013) Inhibition of SnRK1 by metabolites: tissue-dependent effects and cooperative inhibition by glucose 1-phosphate in combination with trehalose 6-phosphate. Plant Physiol Biochem 63: 89–98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Hara LE, Paul MJ, Wingler A (2013) How do sugars regulate plant growth and development? New insight into the role of trehalose-6-phosphate. Mol Plant 6: 261–274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schluepmann H, van Dijken A, Aghdasi M, Wobbes B, Paul M, Smeekens S (2004) Trehalose mediated growth inhibition of Arabidopsis seedlings is due to trehalose-6-phosphate accumulation. Plant Physiol 135: 879–890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vandesteene L, López-Galvis L, Vanneste K, Feil R, Maere S, Lammens W, Rolland F, Lunn JE, Avonce N, Beeckman T, et al. (2012) Expansive evolution of the TREHALOSE-6-PHOSPHATE PHOSPHATASE gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 160: 884–896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Dijken AJ, Schluepmann H, Smeekens SC (2004) Arabidopsis Trehalose-6-Phosphate Synthase 1 is essential for normal vegetative growth and transition to flowering. Plant Physiol 135: 969–977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wahl V, Ponnu J, Schlereth A, Arrivault S, Langenecker T, Franke A, Feil R, Lunn JE, Stitt M, Schmid M (2013) Regulation of flowering by trehalose-6-phosphate signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 339: 704–707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yadav UP, Ivakov A, Feil R, Duan GY, Walther D, Giavalisco P, Piques M, Carillo P, Hubberten HM, Stitt M, et al. (2014) The sucrose-trehalose 6-phosphate (Tre6P) nexus: specificity and mechanisms of sucrose signalling by Tre6P. J Exp Bot 65: 1051–1068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Primavesi LF, Jhurreea D, Andralojc PJ, Mitchell RA, Powers SJ, Schluepmann H, Delatte T, Wingler A, Paul MJ (2009) Inhibition of SNF1-Related Protein Kinase1 activity and regulation of metabolic pathways by trehalose-6-phosphate. Plant Physiol 149: 1860–1871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

