Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(7):D107–D115. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2014.995302

Harmonization of NIOSH Sampling and Analytical Methods with Related International Voluntary Consensus Standards

Kevin Ashley 1
Editor: Martin Harper
PMCID: PMC4589148  NIHMSID: NIHMS723710  PMID: 25625781

INTRODUCTION

The NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM®) is a compilation of analytical methods for air, biological, surface (including dermal) and bulk samples, as well as biological specimens, that have been evaluated and validated in consideration of their fitness for purpose for workplace exposure monitoring. NIOSH sampling and analytical methods are intended to promote accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in industrial hygiene analyses and related applications. NMAM is published online and is available worldwide free of charge.1 Presently in its 5th edition, NMAM is constantly updated as new methods are developed and validated and as revised methods are re-evaluated and their performance verified. Often there are situations during use where certain NIOSH methods may require modification, for example, to accommodate interfering compounds from a particular workplace, to take advantage of unique laboratory capabilities, to make use of equivalent sample preparation or analysis techniques, or to make possible the analysis of a single sample for multiple contaminants. NIOSH methods are evaluated with respect to the NIOSH accuracy criterion A = ±25%, wherein at least 95% of measurements must fall within 25% of the true (or reference) value.2 When method modifications are made, quality control data demonstrating the reliability of the modified method must be obtained, recorded and reported. The methods published in NMAM are relied upon by authoritative bodies such as accrediting organizations and regulatory agencies. Besides sampling and analytical methods, NMAM also includes chapters on quality assurance, portable instrumentation, analysis of fibers, aerosol sampler design, and other guidance on specific areas of interest.

To address requirements for harmonized methods for use by occupational hygiene laboratories, international voluntary consensus standard test methods have been developed and promulgated by ASTM International,3 the Comité Européen de Normalisation4 (European Committee for Standardization, CEN) and the International Organization for Standardization5 (ISO). Like NIOSH methods, these consensus standard procedures describe aspects of sampling and sample preparation as well as measurement, although normally in exhaustive, specific detail. Other related consensus standards offer thorough guidance on sample collection, sample preparation and analytical protocols. Harmonization of NIOSH methods with related voluntary consensus standards is a strategic goal for the 5th edition of NMAM.

Current efforts to update NMAM may also include validated methodologies developed by sister organizations both nationally and internationally, such as the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Health and Safety Laboratory (HSL) in the United Kingdom, the Institut National de Recherche et de Securité (National Institute of Research on Health and Safety at Work, INRS) in France and the the Institut für Arbeitsschutz der Deutschen Geseltzlichen Unfallversicherung (Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurances, IFA) in Germany. NIOSH is keeping abreast of new industrial hygiene and biomonitoring methods and consensus standards developed globally. NIOSH researchers coordinate and collaborate externally and often consider suitable validated methods developed by other institutes and organizations, domestic as well as international.

HARMONIZATION OF ANALYTICAL METHODS

In accordance with and observance of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA),6 a main goal of ongoing NIOSH methods development activities is to ensure that NIOSH methods are harmonized with relevant international voluntary consensus standards. The NTTAA directs US federal government agencies to: (1) rely on applicable voluntary consensus standards in lieu of procedures and documents developed in-house; and (2) participate in the development of pertinent consensus standards that are related to the agencies’ activities. In the course of sampling and analytical methods development, NIOSH may consider adapting applicable existing standards promulgated by ISO, CEN and/or ASTM International.

Regarding method evaluation and validation, an important standard published by CEN, i.e., EN 482, outlines the general requirements for measurement of chemical agents in workplace air.7 This European standard specifies an upper limit for expanded uncertainty U of ±30% for an acceptable sampling and analytical method when applied to measurements spanning the OEL (i.e., between 0.5 – 2× the OEL). EN 482 also cites an upper limit for U of ±50% for measurement of analyte levels between the method quantitation limit and ½ of the applicable OEL. It is pointed out that for most applications, expanded uncertainty (for coverage factor k of 2-3) is equivalent to accuracy as defined by NIOSH.8,9 NIOSH2 and CEN7 method evaluation protocols account for all potential sources of experimental error (both random and systematic), in accordance with the ISO guidelines on measurement uncertainty.10 For a given measurement method, the final estimate of accuracy or expanded uncertainty is a result of combined contributions from propagated errors occurring throughout the sampling and analytical process.

Of the more than 300 published NIOSH sampling and analytical methods,1 a large number have related or parallel international voluntary consensus standards that have been produced by ASTM International,3 ISO4 and/or CEN5 (Table I). In many instances the consensus standard procedures listed were developed with a basis on NIOSH methods, while in some cases NIOSH methods are themselves based on more recently developed ASTM and/or ISO standards. Ideally sampling and analytical methods for toxic agents in workplaces are performance-based, and harmonizing NIOSH methods with consensus standards is not necessarily as important as ensuring that the methods are adequately validated, sufficiently accurate and fit for purpose. NIOSH scientists have participated in the development of related consensus standards for many years. This helps to ensure that NIOSH methods are harmonized with applicable consensus standards and also fosters cooperation and collaboration between NIOSH experts and fellow scientists from domestic organizations and sister institutes in countries around the world.

TABLE I. NIOSH Sampling and Analytical Methods and Related / Parallel International Voluntary Consensus Standards.

NIOSH Method(s) 1 ASTM Standard(s) 3 ISO Standard(S) 4 CEN (EN) Standard(s) 5
0500 & 0501, Particles
not otherwise regulated,
total (gravimetric)
5000 & 5100, Carbon
black (gravimetric)
D6552, Controlling and
characterizing errors in
weighing collected
aerosols
15767, Controlling
and characterizing
uncertainty in
weighing collected
aerosols
0600, Particles not
otherwise regulated,
respirable (gravimetric)
D4532, Respirable dust
in workplace
atmospheres
D6552, Controlling
errors in weighing
collected aerosols
15767, Controlling
and characterizing
uncertainty in
weighing collected
aerosols
0800, Bioaerosols (by
pumped sampling)
0900, Mycobacterium
tuberculosis (filter
sampling)
13137, Pumps for
sampling chemical &
biological agents
13098, Guidelines for
measuring microorganisms
& endotoxin
13137, Pumps for
sampling chemical &
biological agents
14583, Bioaerosol
sampling – requirements
& methods
1003, Halogenated
hydrocarbons, by sorbent
tube & gas chromatography (GC)
1022, Trichloroethylene
by sorbent tube & GC
D3686, Sampling
organic vapors by
charcoal tube
D3687, Analysis of
organic vapors
collected by charcoal
tube
9486, Vaporous
chlorinated
hydrocarbons by
charcoal tube / solvent
desorption / GC
1076, Gases and vapor
measurement by pumped
sampling – requirements
& test methods
1007, Vinyl chloride by
charcoal tube & GC
D4766, Vinyl chloride
by charcoal tube
1008-1460, Organic
vapors (various) by
charcoal tube & GC
D3686, Sampling
organic vapors by
charcoal tube
D3687, Analysis of
organic vapors
collected by charcoal
tube
16017-1, Organic
vapors by charcoal
tube & GC
1076, Gases and vapor
measurement by pumped
sampling – requirements
& test methods
1500, Hydrocarbons, BP
36-126 °C, by charcoal
tube & GC
1501, Aromatic
hydrocarbons by charcoal
tube & GC
D3686, Sampling
organic vapors by
charcoal tube
D3687, Analysis of
organic vapors
collected by charcoal tube
16017-1, Organic
vapors by charcoal
tube & GC
9487, Vaporous
aromatic hydrocarbons
by charcoal tube / solvent desorption / GC
1076, Gases and vapor
measurement by pumped
sampling – requirements
& test methods
1614, Ethylene oxide by
charcoal tube & GC
D4413, Ethylene oxide,
charcoal tube sampling
D5578, Ethylene oxide,
derivatization technique
2001, Aromatic amines
by sorbent tube & GC
2010, Aliphatic amines
by sorbent tube & GC
D3686, Sampling
organic vapors by
charcoal tube
D3687, Analysis of
organic vapors
collected by charcoal
tube
2018, Aliphatic aldehydes
by derivatized silica
cartridge & liquid
chromatography (LC)
2539, Aldehydes,
screening, by GC / GC
GC-mass spectrometry
(MS)
D5197, Formaldehyde
and other carbonyls by
derivatized silica
cartridge & LC
2549, Volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) by
sorbent tube / thermal
desorption / GC-MS
16200-1, VOCs by
solvent desorption /
GC
3600 & 3601, Maneb by
dermal patch & hand
wash (respectively)
TR 14294,
Measurement of
dermal exposure
TS 15278, Evaluation
strategy for dermal
exposure TR 15279, Measurement
of dermal exposure
3700, Benzene by
portable GC
4554-1, -2, -3 & -4, Direct
measurement of toxic
gases and vapours
3800, Inorganic and
organic gases by
extractive Fourier
transform infrared (FTIR)
spectrometry
E1982, Gases and
vapors by open-path
FTIR spectrometry
4554-1, -2, -3 & -4, Direct
measurement of toxic
gases and vapours
5040, Elemental carbon
(diesel particles) by
thermo-optical analysis
D6877, Diesel
particulate exhaust by
thermo-optical analysis
14530, Diesel particulate
matter – general
requirements
5042, Benzene-soluble
particulate matter
D4600, Benzene-
soluble particulate
matter D6494, Asphalt fume
in benzene-soluble
fraction
5503, Polychlorobiphenyls by
filter + sorbent & GC
D4861, Pesticides and
polychlorinated
biphenyls – guidance
on sampling and
analytical methods
5521, Monomeric
isocyanates by impinger
sampling & LC 5522, Isocyanates by
impinger sampling & LC
5525, Isocyanates, total,
by filter or impinger
sampling & LC
D5836 & 5932,
Toluene diisocyanates
(TDI) by LC
D6561, Hexamethylene
diisocyanate (HDI)
aerosol by LC
D6562, Gaseous HDI
by LC
11734-1, Isocyanates
by LC-MS; 11734-2,
Amines & aminoisocyanates by
LC-MS
11735, Total
isocyanates by LC
11736, Isocyanate by
double-filter sampling
& LC
16702, Total organic
isocyanates by LC
17737, Guidelines for
selecting isocyanate
methods
5524, Metalworking
fluids – gravimetric
analysis
D7049, Metal removal
fluid aerosol
5506, Polynuclear
aromatic hydrocarbons by
filter + sorbent & LC
5515, Polynuclear
aromatic hydrocarbons by
filter + sorbent & GC
5800 Polycyclic aromatic
compounds by filter +
sorbent & flow-injection
analysis
D6209, Polycyclic
aromatic compounds by
sorbent-backed filter &
GC-MS
5600, Organophosphorus
pesticides by filter +
sorbent & GC
5601, Organonitrogen
pesticides by filter +
sorbent & LC
D4861, Pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls
6004, SO2 by treated
filter & IC
D2914, SO2 by bubbler
& colorimetry
6009, Hg by sorbent tube
& cold vapor atomic
absorption (CVAA)
17733, Hg by CVAA
or cold vapor atomic
fluorescence
6013, H2S by charcoal
tube and ion
chromatography (IC)
4913, H2S by length of
stain reading
6014, NO & NO2 by
sorbent tube & visible
absorption
spectrophotometry
6700, NO2 by diffusive
sampler & visible
absorption
spectrophotometry
8761, NO2 by detector
tube & direct
indication
6604, CO by
electrochemical sensor
8760, CO by detector
tube
4554-1, -2, -3 & -4, Direct
measurement of toxic
gases and vapours
7013, Al; 7020, Ca; 7024,
Cr; 7027, Co; 7029, Cu;
7030, Zn; 7048, Cd;
7074, W (insoluble);
7082, Pb, by flame
atomic absorption
spectrometry (FAAS)
D4185, Metals by
FAAS D6785, Pb by FAAS or
graphite furnace atomic
absorption spectrometry (GFAAS)
8518, Pb by FAAS or
electrothermal atomic
absorption (ETAAS)
11174, Cd by FAAS
or ETAAS
13890, Metals &
metalloids – requirements
& test methods
7056, Ba, soluble
compounds; 7074, W
(solubles), by FAAS
15202-2, Annex B:
Soluble metals and
metalloids in
workplace air
13890, Metals &
metalloids – requirements
& test methods
7105, Pb by GFAAS D6785, Pb by FAAS or
GFAAS
8518, Pb by FAAS or
ETAAS
13890, Metals &
metalloids – requirements
& test methods
7300, 7301, 7302, 7303,
7304 Elements by ICP-
AES
D7035, Metals and
metalloids by ICP-AES
15202-1, -2 & -3,
Metals and metalloids
by ICP-AES
(sampling, preparation
and analysis)
13890, Metals &
metalloids – requirements
& test methods
7400, Asbestos fibers by
phase-contrast
microscopy (PCM)
7402, Asbestos fibers by
transmission electron
microscopy (TEM)
D7200, Airborne fibers
in mines & quarries,
including asbestos, by
PCM & TEM
D7201, Asbestos fibers
by PCM with TEM
option
8672, Airborne
inorganic fibres by
PCM
7401, Alkaline dusts, by
acid-base titration
17091, LiOH, NaOH,
KOH & CaOH2 by
suppressed IC
7500, Respirable
crystalline silica (RCS)
by X-ray diffraction
(XRD)
7602, RCS by infrared
(IR)
7603, RCS in coal mine
dust
24095, Guidance for
measuring respirable
crystalline silica
7600 & 7703, Cr(VI) by
Ultraviolet-Visible (UV-
Vis) spectrophotometry
7605, Cr(VI) by IC and
UV-Vis detection
D6832, Cr(VI) by IC
and UV-Vis detection
16740, Cr(VI) by IC
and UV-Vis detection
7704, Be in air by
fluorescence
9110, Be in wipes by
fluorescence
D7202, Be in air or
wipes by fluorescence
D7296, Be in dry wipes
D7707, Be wipe
specification
7910, Arsenic trioxide by
GFAAS
11041, Arsenic and
arsenic trioxide by
atomic absorption
7902, Fluorides, aerosol
& gas, by ion-selective
electrode (ISE)
D4765, Fluorides by
ISE
7906, Fluorides, aerosol
& gas, by IC
21438-3, Fluorides,
aerosol & gas, by IC
7907, HCl, HBr & HNO3
by IC
D7773, HCl, HBr &
HNO3 by suppressed IC
21438-2, HCl, HBr &
HNO3, by IC
7908, H2SO4 & H3PO4 by
IC
D4856, H2SO4 by IC 21438-1, H2SO4 &
H3PO4 by IC
9100 & 9105, Pb on
wipes
9102, Elements on wipes
D6966, Wipe sampling
for metals
D7659, Guide for
elemental surface
sampling
D7822, Dermal wipe
sampling for elemental
analysis
E7192, Pb wipe
specification
TR 14294,
Measurement of
dermal exposure
TS 15278, Evaluation
strategy for dermal
exposure
TR 15279, Measurement
of dermal exposure
9200 & 9201,
Chlorinated and
organonitrogen
herbicides, hand wash &
dermal patch
(respectively)
9202 & 9205, Captan and
thiophanate-methyl in
hand rinse and dermal
patch (respectively)
TR 14294,
Measurement of
dermal exposure
TS 15278, Evaluation
strategy for dermal
exposure
TR 15279, Measurement
of dermal exposure

As a related resource, the IFA in Germany, in cooperation with experts from other member European nations participating in deliberations of CEN Technical Committee (TC) 137,5 has made available a database of over 225 validated sampling and analytical methods for more than 125 substances.11 Ratings of methods for these analytes are provided based on factors established by a European expert committee.12 Presently within CEN there is an ongoing project to update and expand this very useful methods database. Many NIOSH methods and international consensus standards can be found cited in this database.

Various older NIOSH methods for organics listed in Table I, such as those for organic gases and vapors, are based on the use of packed gas chromatography (GC) columns. In practice, packed GC columns are rarely used now and have been largely replaced by capillary GC columns. The use of capillary GC columns has been described in many of the more recently published consensus standards (ASTM International and ISO) listed in Table I. In order to modernize many of these older NIOSH methods (which were developed mostly in the 1970s and 1980s), there is a concerted effort to update a number of the NIOSH GC analytical methodologies for organic vapors and gases. Thus a project is now underway to validate a multi-analyte procedure (or procedures) that can be used to measure multiple gaseous organic compounds in occupational atmospheres by means of sorbent sampling and capillary GC separation / isolation, followed by appropriate detection schemes like flame ionization detection (FID), photoionization detection (PID) or mass spectrometry (MS). This will result in the promulgation of new NIOSH methods for toxic organic gases and vapors that are up to date and better harmonized with applicable international consensus standards.

GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS

Within NMAM, separate from the sampling and analytical methods, are eighteen chapters covering a variety of subjects.1 Explanatory chapters on quality assurance, sampling guidance, portable instrumentation, method development and evaluation, aerosol collection, measurement of specific analytes or groups of analytes, etc., provide valuable guidance to the users of NIOSH methods. These chapters provide a convenient resource that augments related consensus standards and technical information often available elsewhere in monographs and texts. Presently, efforts are underway to update several chapters that have not been revised in a number of years. Also, new chapters on key subjects including guidelines for the performance of biomonitoring methods and direct-reading instruments are planned. Similarly for sampling and analytical methods, harmonization of the guidelines put down in these chapters with relevant consensus standards guidance is essential and will be ensured.

Many of the methods published in NMAM specify the collection of workplace aerosol samples using filter samplers such as 37-mm closed-face filter cassettes (CFCs). NIOSH considers that all particles entering the sampler (e.g., CFC) should be included as part of the sample whether they deposit on the filter or on the inside surfaces of the sampler.13 All aerosol particles entering occupational air samplers should be included in the sample for gravimetric analysis as well as for analytes such as metals and metalloids. Hence, during sample preparation and analysis, procedures should be used to account for material adhering to the internal walls of sampling cassettes. In the spirit of harmonization, consideration of internal sampler wall deposits is included in related international voluntary consensus standards that describe the sampling and analysis of airborne metals and metalloids.14,15

Also linked to guidance on NMAM sampling and analytical procedures for gases and vapors are relevant ASTM International and ISO standards describing the evaluation of diffusive samplers.16,17 Although validation of passive monitors18 may be expensive (sometimes prohibitively so), the ability to obtain good estimates of analytical uncertainty for diffusive sampling techniques is important for achieving more accurate real-time exposure assessments. This is especially true of screening techniques, which typically require vast amounts of performance data to enable adequate characterization of overall measurement uncertainty (and consequent evaluation of fitness-for-purpose).19 Harmonized guidance on diffusive sampling16,17 should prove beneficial for evaluating newer passive monitoring techniques such as canister sampling, helium-diffusive sampling and solid-phase micro-extraction.

Increased use of direct-reading monitors for occupational hygiene applications20 underscores the need for standardized evaluation and validation protocols for these devices. Recently, guidance on evaluation of direct-reading instruments for gas and vapor monitoring has become available from NIOSH,21 for example with applications to four-gas monitors. Currently there are efforts to develop international voluntary consensus standards for real-time monitoring devices that will accommodate not only onsite quantitative analysis but also screening techniques for myriad applications.

CONCLUDING REMARKS

Further efforts are currently underway that will fulfill requirements for fully validated NIOSH and consensus standard procedures for workplace exposure measurements. For example, new procedures describing the analysis of all aerosol particles entering a given air sampling device are being developed and evaluated. Through effective use of national and international collaborations and resources, further advances in the field of industrial hygiene chemistry are underway and improvements in sampling and analytical protocols are continually being explored. The NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods remains an invaluable global resource for the occupational hygiene profession. Harmonization with voluntary consensus standards organizations such as ASTM International, CEN and ISO is crucial in leveraging current and future applied research, as well as technology transfer endeavors, within the discipline of occupational hygiene sampling and analysis.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Rosa Key-Schwartz, Alan Echt, Brian Curwin and Gayle DeBord for review of the draft manuscript.

This article was prepared by US government employees as part of their official duties and legally may not be copyrighted in the United States of America. Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). In addition, citations to Web sites external to NIOSH do not constitute NIOSH endorsement of the sponsoring organizations or their programs or products. Furthermore, NIOSH is not responsible for the content of these Web sites. All Web addresses referenced in this document were accessible as of the publication date. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

REFERENCES

  • 1.National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. NIOSH; Cincinnati: [accessed 8 October 2014]. www.cdc.gov/niosh/nmam. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.NIOSH . Guidelines for Air Sampling and Analytical Development and Evaluation. NIOSH; Cincinnati: [accessed 21 October 2014]. 1995. NIOSH Publ. No. 95-117. www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/95-117. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.ASTM International . Committee D22 on Air Quality, Subcommittee D22.04 on Workplace Air Quality. ASTM International; West Conshohocken, Pa.: [accessed 21 October 2014]. www.astm.org. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.International Organization for Standardization (ISO) ISO Technical Committee 146 on Air Quality, Subcommittee 2 on Workplace Air Quality. ISO; Geneva: [accessed 31 August 2014]. www.iso.org. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Comité Européen de Normalisacion (CEN) Technical Committee 137 on Assessment of Workplace Exposure to Chemical and Biological Agents. CEN; Brussels: [accessed 27 March 2014]. http://standards.cen.eu. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.United States Government . National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) US Government; Washington: 1996. Public Law 104–113. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.CEN . General Requirements for the Performance of Procedures for the Measurement of Chemical Agents. CEN; Brussels: 2012. EN 482. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bartley DL. Reconciling traditional accuracy assessment with the ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in air quality measurements. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2004;1:D37–D41. doi: 10.1080/15459620490432079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.ASTM International . Standard Practice for Characterizing Uncertainty in Air Quality Measurements. ASTM International; West Conshohocken, Pa.: 2008. ASTM D7440. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.ISO . Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (ISO GUM) ISO; Geneva: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Institut für Arbeitsschutz der Deutschen Geseltzlichen Unfallversicherung (IFA) GESTIS Analytical Methods Database. IFA; Sankt Augustin, Germany: [accessed 12 December 2013]. www.dguv.de/ifa. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Breuer D, Quintana MJ, Howe AM. Results of the EU project entitled, “Analytical Methods for Chemical Agents,” for the evaluation of methods for analysis of hazardous substances in workplace air. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2006;3:D126–D136. doi: 10.1080/15459620600966906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ashley K, Harper M. Closed-face filter cassette (CFC) sampling – Guidance on procedures for inclusion of material adhering to internal sampler surfaces. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2013;10:D29–D33. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2012.750554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.ASTM International . Standard Test Method for the Determination of Metals and Metalloids in Airborne Particulate Matter by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES) ASTM International; West Conshohocken, Pa.: 2010. ASTM D7035. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.ISO . Workplace Air – Determination of Metals and Metalloids by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) ISO; Geneva: 2011. ISO 30011. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.ASTM International . Standard Practice for Evaluating the Performance of Diffusive Samplers. ASTM International; West Conshohocken, Pa.: 2013. ASTM D6246. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.ISO . Workplace Atmospheres - Protocol for Evaluating the Performance of Diffusive Samplers. ISO; Geneva: 2007. ISO 16107. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Harper M. Personal monitoring – Passive. In: Reedijk J, editor. Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering. Elsevier Press on-line; Amsterdam: doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.00399-1. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Song R, Schlecht PC, Ashley K. Field screening test methods – Performance criteria and performance characteristics. J. Hazard. Mater. 2001;83:29–39. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3894(00)00325-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Harper M, Smith PN. Occupational hygiene – Gas chromatography. In: Reedijk J, editor. Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering. Elsevier Press on-line; Amsterdam: doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.04842-3. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.NIOSH . Components for Evaluation of Direct-Reading Monitors for Gases and Vapors. NIOSH; Cincinnati: [accessed 21 October 2014]. 2012. NIOSH Publ. No. 2012-162. www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2012-162. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES