Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1974 Dec;36(12):1225–1230. doi: 10.1136/hrt.36.12.1225

Day to day and beat to beat variation in normal 3 orthogonal lead electrocardiograms.

H T Cawood, P W Macfarlane, S Hillis, T D Lawrie
PMCID: PMC458946  PMID: 4441454

Full text

PDF
1225

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bonner R. E., Crevasse L., Ferrer M. I., Greenfield J. C., Jr A new computer program for analysis of scalar electrocardiograms. Comput Biomed Res. 1972 Dec;5(6):629–653. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(72)90043-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CACERES C. A. Electrocardiographic analysis by a computer system. Arch Intern Med. 1963 Feb;111:196–202. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1963.03620260056010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cawood H. T., Hillis S., Macfarlane P. W., Lawrie T. D. Day to day variation in 3 orthogonal lead electrocardiogram parameters after acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1974 Dec;36(12):1231–1238. doi: 10.1136/hrt.36.12.1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DRAPER H. W., PEFFER C. J., STALLMANN F. W., LITTMANN D., PIPBERGER H. V. THE CORRECTED ORTHOGONAL ELECTROCARDIOGRAM AND VECTORCARDIOGRAM IN 510 NORMAL MEN (FRANK LEAD SYSTEM). Circulation. 1964 Dec;30:853–864. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.30.6.853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FRANK E. An accurate, clinically practical system for spatial vectorcardiography. Circulation. 1956 May;13(5):737–749. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.13.5.737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fischmann E., Cosma J., Pipberger H. V. Beat to beat and observer variation of the electrocardiogram. Am Heart J. 1968 Apr;75(4):465–473. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(68)90005-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Macfarlane P. W. ECG waveform identification by digital computer. Cardiovasc Res. 1971 Jan;5(1):141–146. doi: 10.1093/cvr/5.1.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Macfarlane P. W., Lorimer A. R., Lawrie T. D. Normal ranges of modified axial lead system electrocardiogram parameters. Br Heart J. 1971 Mar;33(2):258–265. doi: 10.1136/hrt.33.2.258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pordy L., Jaffe H., Chesky K., Friedberg C. K., Fallowes L. Computer diagnosis of electrocardiograms. IV. A computer program for contous analysis with clinical results of rhythm and contour interpretation. Comput Biomed Res. 1968 Feb;1(4):408–433. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(68)90068-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pryor T. A., Lindsay A. E., England R. W. Computer analysis of serial electrocardiograms. Comput Biomed Res. 1972 Dec;5(6):709–714. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(72)90049-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pryor T. A., Russell R., Budkin A., Price W. G. Electrocardiographic interpretation by computer. Comput Biomed Res. 1969 Dec;2(6):537–548. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(69)90032-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wartak J., Milliken J. A., Karchmar J. Computer program for diagnostic evaluation of electrocardiograms. Comput Biomed Res. 1971 Jun;4(3):225–238. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(71)90028-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Willems J. L., Poblete P. F., Pipberger H. V. Day-to-day variation of the normal orthogonal electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram. Circulation. 1972 May;45(5):1057–1064. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.45.5.1057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES