Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Oct 1;5:14837. doi: 10.1038/srep14837

Azo-Based Iridium(III) Complexes as Multicolor Phosphorescent Probes to Detect Hypoxia in 3D Multicellular Tumor Spheroids

Lingli Sun 1,*, Guanying Li 1,*, Xiang Chen 1, Yu Chen 1, Chengzhi Jin 1, Liangnian Ji 1, Hui Chao 1,a
PMCID: PMC4589790  PMID: 26423609

Abstract

Hypoxia is an important characteristic of malignant solid tumors and is considered as a possible causative factor for serious resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy. The exploration of novel fluorescent probes capable of detecting hypoxia in solid tumors will aid tumor diagnosis and treatment. In this study, we reported the design and synthesis of a series of “off-on” phosphorescence probes for hypoxia detection in adherent and three-dimensional multicellular spheroid models. All of the iridium(III) complexes incorporate an azo group as an azo-reductase reactive moiety to detect hypoxia. Reduction of non-phosphorescent probes Ir1-Ir8 by reductases under hypoxic conditions resulted in the generation of highly phosphorescent corresponding amines for detection of hypoxic regions. Moreover, these probes can penetrate into 3D multicellular spheroids over 100 μm and image the hypoxic regions. Most importantly, these probes display a high selectivity for the detection of hypoxia in 2D cells and 3D multicellular spheroids.


Hypoxia is caused by the limited delivery of oxygen distant from functional blood vessels (>100 μm)1 and is a typical characteristic of solid tumors. Cells located in hypoxic areas often become quiescent, limiting the effects of anti-cancer drugs2. The hypoxic status has been considered an indicator of an adverse prognosis for solid tumors because it indicates tumor progression toward a more malignant phenotype with increased metastatic potential and resistance to treatment3,4,5,6. Therefore, the development of novel methods for the detection of hypoxic regions in a solid tumor is important. To date, many approaches have been used to selectively detect hypoxic regions in solid tumors7,8,9,10,11,12,13. Among these approaches, the fluorescence imaging method offers various advantages, including simple operation and high sensitivity.

Many small molecular-based probes for the detection of hypoxia exploit the phenomenon that hypoxia causes an increase in reductive stress. For example, some reductases such as nitro-reductase (NTR), quinone-reductase (QR) and azo-reductase (AzoR) are highly expressed in hypoxic tumors14. Taken advantages of these facts, many NTR-sensitive hypoxia probes utilizing nitro (or p-nitrobenzyl) moiety as NTR substrates have successfully developed15,16,17,18,19,20. Quinone-based hypoxia probes have been also reported21,22,23. In addition, AzoR is an important family of reductases that can reduce the azo bond in a stepwise manner to anilines24,25. The catalysis involves the sequential transfer of four electrons to form aniline after the final reduction; in the first step of reduction, the formation of azo-anion radical compounds is a reversible oxygen-dependent process (Fig. 1a). In normoxic environment, which is abundant in oxygen, the reduction is suppressed. Moreover, azo dyes, such as azobenzene derivatives, are non-luminescent because of the ultrafast conformational change around the N = N bond after photoexcitation26,27,28,29. Conjugating an azo moiety directly to a fluorophore can quench the original fluorescence. Exploiting these characteristics, certain azo compounds have been proposed in AzoR detection in bacteria24,30 and tumor-targeted therapy prodrugs31,32,33. Recently, some azo-based compounds showed chemical reactivity with biological reducing agents. Li et al. have reported an azo-based fluorescent probe for sulfide, which would react with sulfide and be reduced to amino produce34. Authors suggested that the electron deficiency of the azobenzene group was crucial to the reaction between the azo-based probe and sulfide. Our group has also synthesized some dinuclear metal complexes containing azo linker and found they could react with thiols or sulfite/bisulfite ions35,36,37. The metal coordination is also considerable electron deficient for azo group. A few examples have reported employing azo-based turn-on fluorescent probes to obtain images of the hypoxic level in vitro or in vivo25,38,39.

Figure 1. Detection mechanism and chemical structures of the phosphorescent Ir(III) complexes Ir1-Ir8 synthesized and evaluated in this study.

Figure 1

One limitation of these reductase-based fluorescent probes for the detection of AzoR or hypoxia was that they were evaluated with adherent cells in which the hypoxia phenomenon was artificially induced, such as through the presence of a glass cover on top of the cells39, the use of a drug treatment to abolish cardiac contractility40 or vessel ligation25. These models do not adequately reflect the microenvironment of cells in vivo. A three-dimensional (3D) model, such as multicellular spheroids, organotypic explants and 3D scaffolds, can overcome these problems because it more closely reflects the dimensionality of the tumor microenvironment, thus rendering results with a higher similarity to those in an in vivo tumor41. In particular, 3D multicellular spheroids are advantageous in vitro models for providing cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions and recreating certain mass transport limitations likely encountered in vivo42,43.

One valuable characteristic of these models is their diffusion limit of approximately 150–200 μm for many molecules, particularly oxygen43,44. Because of these mass transport limitations, spheroids with diameters larger than 400–500 μm generally display gradients of oxygen and form a hypoxic core in the center. Thus, 3D multicellular spheroids are excellent models for detecting hypoxia by generating a hypoxic environment without specialized hypoxic chambers. To date, only the Papkovsky group45,46 has evaluated oxygenation imaging in 3D multicellular spheroids using luminescent probes based on oxygen quenching of luminescence. To image hypoxia using bioreductase-reactive compounds is of high value to distinguish the long-term hypoxia in solid tumors with acute hypoxia. By far, using reductase-reactive luminescent probes to image hypoxia in 3D multicellular spheroids is still blank.

As described, we have successfully developed some azo-based dinuclear iridium(III) complexes as phosphorescent probes for thiols or sulfite/bisulfite ions35,36,37. We speculate that electron efficient groups would reduce the chemical reactivity between azo-group and biological reducing agents, and facilitate the reaction selectivity of azo compounds with AzoR. In this study, we presented a series of mononuclear Ir(III) complexes containing azo group as the bio-reducible moiety and phosphorescent trigger. Complexes [Ir(C^N)2(N^N)]+(Ir1-Ir8, Fig. 1b) were synthesized, and their capability of being reduced under hypoxic conditions was tested with fresh rat liver microsomes. Hypoxia imaging in cells was performed in HeLa cells cultured with different oxygen concentrations. More importantly, we employed these probes for hypoxia imaging in 3D multicellular spheroids, which display a hypoxic region in the center, closely reflecting in vivo solid tumors. Different sizes of 3D multicellular spheroids were cultured and imaged with these probes to correlate the hypoxic region within the 3D multicellular spheroids with their sizes.

Results

Synthesis and characterization

The p-azobpy and dmap-azobpy ligands were prepared by the reduction of nitro precursors. The preparations of the Ir1-Ir8 complexes were performed through bridge splitting reactions of the dinuclear precursors [Ir(C^N)2Cl]2 with the N^N ligands p-azobpy and dmap-azobpy in a stoichiometric amount. The formations of all of the complexes were further confirmed using FT-IR, ESI-MS, 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopy (Figures S1–S24).

The single crystal structure of Ir1 was analyzed through single-crystal X-ray diffraction, and the crystal structure is shown in Fig. 2. Crystal data and structural refinements are shown in Table S1. Selected bond lengths and angles are presented in Table S2. The coordination of the iridium atom is a distorted octahedral. The cyclometalated C atoms of the dfppy ligands are in a mutual cis arrangement, and their high trans influence leads to Ir-N (p-azobpy) distances of 2.125(9) Å and 2.111(9) Å, which were longer than the corresponding distances of Ir-N (dfppy) (2.061(9) Å and 2.049(9) Å) in the cyclometalated ligand. This result was similar to the reported crystal structures of cyclometalated Ir(III) complexes [Ir(C^N)2(N^N)]+ 47,48.

Figure 2. The crystal structure of Ir1.

Figure 2

For clarity, the solvent molecules, the hydrogen atoms, and the counter anions are omitted.

Electrochemical studies

We evaluated the reduction potential of these probes using cyclic voltammetry, and summarized the redox potentials of the azo group and the iridium centre of these probes in Table 1. Cyclic voltammograms of the probes in an anaerobic CH3CN solution displayed two reduction waves corresponding to consecutive one-electron reductions. The first reduction waves (corresponding to azo0/−1) were reversible, while the second waves (corresponding to azo−1/−2) were not completely reversible. The φ (azo0/−1) of these probes varied from −0.6748 to −0.8930 V vs SCE, while (azo−1/−2) ranged from −0.8442 to −1.1233 V vs SCE. The redox potential of the azo group in the non-substituted aromatic azo compounds (R = H, Ir1-Ir4) was less than that in the dimethylamine substituted compounds (R = NMe2, Ir5-Ir8), which is an electron-donating group. More importantly, compared with the free organic azo compounds, such as methyl red (φ = −1.2665 V) and disperse red (φ = −1.1295 V)25, the reduction potential of the azo group in these azo compounds decreased. We reasoned that the azo group is activated when conjugated to iridium(III) complexes. Thus, these azo-containing Ir(III) compounds appeared to be good candidates for use as a hypoxic reduction moiety and performed even more efficiently than organic azo compounds.

Table 1. Oxidation and reduction potentials of various probes.

Probe azo−1/−2 azo0/−1 Ir4+/3+
Ir1 −0.8442 −0. 6748 +1.0170
Ir2 −1.0966 −0. 7796 +1.0556
Ir3 −0.9228 −0. 6825 +1.1910
Ir4 −0.9362 −0. 7579 +1.0651
Ir5 −0.9006 −0. 7749 +1.2620
Ir6 −0.9332 −0. 8381 +1.2973
Ir7 −0.9016 −0. 7914 +1.3087
Ir8 −1.1233 −0. 8930 +1.0315

Hypoxia response assays

The azo-based probes were non-emissive in organic solution and in aqueous PBS solution. We examined whether other ions could lead to a notable phosphorescent response toward these probes (Fig. 3a and S25). A high concentration of ions (1 mM of H2O2, Mg2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Co2+, Ca2+, SO42−, HCO3, NO2, NO3, SO32−, I, ClO4, ClO, S2−, CO32−) was added to a PBS solution of probes and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Among the additional tested ions, limited responses in phosphorescence intensity were observed. Considering that the azo group might be reduced inside of the cells, potential biological reducing agents, such as cysteine (Cys), cystine, sodium ascorbate, and reduced glutathione (GSH), were also tested. No enhancement in phosphorescence intensity was observed. This result suggests that these azo-based Ir(III) complexes are chemically inert toward common ions and bio-related reducing agents.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Phosphorescence intensity of Ir3 and Ir7 (2.5 μM) treated with different amino acids or ions (1 mM of each species) in a mixed solution of 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) under normoxic and hypoxic environments. Bars on the left represent the luminescent responses under a normoxic environment, while bars on the right represent the subsequent degassing with argon gas and addition of rat liver microsomes (0.25 mg protein/mL) and 50 μM NADPH for 30 min at 37 °C. From bar (1) to (20): Cys, cystine, GSH, sodium ascorbate, H2O2, Mg2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Co2+, Ca2+, SO42, HCO3, NO2, NO3, SO32−, I, ClO4, ClO, S2−, CO32−. λex/em = 405/580 nm; (b) Time-dependent changes of phosphorescence intensity of Ir3 (left) and Ir7 (right) (2.5 μM) under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Data were measured at 37 °C in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing rat liver microsomes and NADPH as a cofactor. NADPH was added at the point indicated by the arrow. λex/em = 405/580 nm.

Next, we tested the capability of these probes to detect hypoxia in biological systems using rat liver microsomes, which contain various reductases. Dissolved oxygen was removed from a PBS solution of probes by argon bubbling, and then fresh microsomes from rat liver were added. When NADPH as a cofactor for the reductases was added into this mixture, the phosphorescence intensity increased sharply to maximum within 30 s and then remained constant (Fig. 3b and S26), suggesting that these probes were reduced rapidly by reductases in liver microsomes. More importantly, this enhancement in phosphorescence intensity was only observed under hypoxic conditions. When reduced under hypoxia, these probes exhibited enhancements in phosphorescence intensity of 17.5-fold for Ir1, 16.9-fold for Ir2, 39.0-fold for Ir3, 38.4-fold for Ir4, 11.4-fold for Ir5, 13.5-fold for Ir6, 58.8-fold for Ir7, and 54.2-fold for Ir8, respectively. After reduction under hypoxia, the maximum emission intensity ranged from 510 nm for Ir1 and Ir5 to 640 nm for Ir4 and Ir8, displaying a green to red emissive solution, which could be observed by the naked eye (Fig. 4). Interestingly, the phosphorescent response to hypoxia could also be obtained in a mixed solution containing a high concentration of ions or bio-related reducing agents (Fig. 3a), indicating that these probes could also function in a complex biological background. Additionally, the phosphorescence intensities of these reduction products were only slightly affected by pH when the pH values were varied from 3.0 to 10.0. (Figure S27) Thus, the azo-based Ir(III) complexes Ir1-Ir8 could be selective turn-on phosphorescent probes for hypoxia with a multi-emissive color.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) Emission spectra of probes incubated with rat liver microsomes and 50 μM NADPH at 37°C for 30 min. (b) Photos of probes Ir1-Ir8 after incubation with rat liver microsomes and NADPH were captured under a handle UV lamp (365  nm).

We speculated that these azo compounds were completely reduced in the corresponding amine production (IrNH21-IrNH24) under hypoxic conditions, which were strongly phosphorescent emissive. The absorption spectra also demonstrated the reduction of the azo bond under hypoxia. For example, Ir7 displayed a broad absorption peak at 510 nm (Fig. 5A), attributed to an electron transition of the azo bond. However, after reduction using liver microsomes under hypoxic conditions, this peak disappeared. We further confirmed the production of amines generated from Ir7 reduction by liver microsomes under hypoxia using ESI-MS analysis (Fig. 5c–e). The mass spectrum of Ir7 showed a peak at 904.4, corresponding to [M-Cl]+. After incubation with rat liver microsomes/NADPH under hypoxia, the reduced product was found, as shown by the appearance of the peak at 772.3. Zoom scan of the iridium isotope peaks was also conducted and the result was perfectly fit to the simulation of the amino reduction product (IrNH23). Similar results were observed in other probes (Figures S28–S34).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

UV-Vis (a) and emission (b) spectral changes of Ir7 in the presence of rat liver microsomes (0.25 mg protein/mL)/NADPH (50 μM) under normoxic (black) or hypoxic (red) conditions. Excitation wavelength: 405 nm. Both ex/em slits were set to 10 nm. (c–e): ESI-MS analysis of the reaction mixture generated by Ir7; (c) ESI-MS spectrum of Ir7. (d) ESI-MS spectrum of the product of Ir7 after incubation with rat liver microsomes/NADPH at 37 °C for 30 min. (e) Zoom scan MS spectra of iridium isotope peaks of (d) and the simulation of IrNH23.

Imaging hypoxia in adherent cells

We applied the probes to investigate whether they could detect hypoxia in living cells. As shown in Fig. 6a, when the probes were treated with HeLa cells under normoxia, no phosphorescent signal could be detected in the cells. However, when the cells were cultured under hypoxia (1% O2), the addition of the probes induced a remarkable increase in the phosphorescence intensity within the cells. Flavoproteins, such as NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase, are thought to be responsible for the metabolic activation of bioreductive compounds under hypoxia6. When a flavoprotein inhibitor diphenyliodonium chloride (DPI)49,50 was added to the hypoxic cultured cells, the phosphorescence intensity was dramatically suppressed, suggesting that these probes are possibly reduced by flavoproteins. For all of these probes, the complexes with an unsubstituted aromatic azo ligand (Ir1-Ir4) displayed stronger phosphorescence intensity than those with dimethylamino group-substituted aromatic azo ligands (Ir5-Ir8) when they were reduced under hypoxia (Fig. 6b). Among the complexes, Ir3 exhibited the strongest phosphorescence intensity. Additionally, these probes displayed different emissive colors when reduced under hypoxia in solution, as well as in cells, expanding the practical application in living cell imaging for hypoxia.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(a) Confocal images of adherent HeLa cells treated with probes under normoxia (20% O2) and hypoxia (1% O2) with or without DPI (100 μM). HeLa cells were incubated with compounds (2.5 μM) for 30 min. Ir1, Ir5: λex/em = 405/510 ± 20 nm; Ir2, Ir6: λex/em = 405/570 ± 20 nm; Ir3, Ir7: λem = 405/580 ± 20 nm; Ir4, Ir8: λem = 405/640 ± 20 nm; Scale bar: 10 μm. (b) Quantified phosphorescence intensities of HeLa cells incubated with probes Ir1-Ir8 under hypoxia (1% O2).

Imaging of hypoxia in 3D multicellular spheroids

Inspired by the selective response in phosphorescence intensity toward hypoxia of these probes in vitro assays and in imaging of adherent cells, we sought to establish the ability of these probes to detect the hypoxic level in 3D multicellular spheroids, which are more appropriate models of a solid tumor offering more similar microenvironments to those of tumors than adherent tumor cells. Nutrients, particularly oxygen, only diffuse 50–100 μm into tumor spheroids, resulting in hypoxic regions of solid tumors farther than 100 μm from the blood vessels44,51. Therefore, 3D multicellular tumor spheroid cultures develop oxygen gradients at diameters between 200 μm and 500 μm due to the oxygen diffusion limitation.

Spheroids with different sizes (approximately 150 μm and 500 μm in diameter) were cultured and exposed to these probes (2.5 μM), and then the phosphorescence was examined by confocal microscopy. (Fig. 7 and S35-S37) As shown in Fig. 7, no phosphorescence intensity could be detected in the spheroids of a small size because they are not sufficiently large to provide an efficient hypoxic region. In contrast, in large spheroids, remarkable phosphorescence intensity was observed in the center of the spheroids with a distance of approximately 100 μm from the outer edge, suggesting a hypoxic region in the spheroids. The phosphorescent images along the z-axis were also captured every 5 μm. The spheroids exhibited a substantially stronger phosphorescence intensity at depths of 40–80 μm, which could be considered the center region of these spheroids. This result indicates that these 3D multicellular spheroids have hypoxic regions in the center, as revealed by imaging of the hypoxic sensitive probes.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(a–d) Confocal images of 3D multicellular spheroids incubated with Ir3 (left) and Ir7 (right). λex/em = 405/580 ± 20 nm; (a) small 3D spheroids (diameter of 100–150 μm); (b) large 3D spheroids (diameter of 400–500 μm); (c) Scanned Z-axis for large 3D spheroids at 5 μm intervals. Scale bar: 100 μm. (d) The merged images of Z-stack images of an intact spheroid. (e) Confocal images of 3D multicellular spheroids incubated with Ir1, Ir2 and Ir4 (left) and Ir5, Ir6 and Ir8 (right). λex = 405 nm, Ir1, Ir5: λem = 510 ± 20 nm; Ir2, Ir6: λem = 570 ± 20 nm; Ir3, Ir7: λem = 580 ± 20 nm; Ir4, Ir8: λem = 640 ± 20 nm. The images were obtained under a 10 × objective. Scale bars represent 100 μm.

Cell viability assay

An ideal cellular probe for practical applications should minimally perturb living systems at the concentrations used. To verify the potential toxicity of Ir1-Ir8 to cells, MTT assays52 were conducted under normoxic and hypoxic conditions (Fig. 8a). The complexes were exposed to HeLa cells with different concentrations (2.5 μM, 5 μM, and 10 μM) for 12 h, and then the cell viability was evaluated by an MTT assay. The results for the normoxic and hypoxic conditions were similar for all of the compounds tested. Generally, at probe concentrations of 2.5 μM, HeLa cells exhibited viability higher than 80% after incubation for 12 h. These results suggested that under our experimental conditions (2.5 μM for 0.5 h incubation), these probes exhibited only a slight cytotoxic effect against HeLa cells.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

(a) Cell viability of adherent 2D HeLa cells incubated with different concentrations of probes for 12 h under normoxic (I) and hypoxic (II) environment. (b) Growth inhibition assay in 3D spheroids. Growth curves of spheroids after various treatments. (c) Representative images of spheroids treated with eight probes (2.5 μM). Spheroids cultured in DMEM as a control; Scale bars = 50 μm.

The inhibition of these probes against 3D multicellular spheroids was also evaluated53. 3D multicellular spheroids were grown until the diameters were larger than 400 μm. Then, the probes were added, the spheroids were cultured, and images were obtained by internal hours. As shown in Fig. 8b,c, spheroids without the treatment of probes grew slowly, as the diameter of the spheroids increased with time. Cells located in the spheroid periphery were relatively free moving while the innermost cells became compact. The loose region with a depth of approximately 100 μm is similar to that observed for the diffusion of oxygen44. The reason for this phenomenon may be due to the oxygen transport limitations in spheroids. When spheroids were treated with probes, their diameters initially increased and then remained unchanged after 1 day of culture. These results indicated that these compounds exhibited an inhibition effect against tumor spheroids after 1 day but only a slight toxic effect over a short incubation time (6 h in the imaging experiments).

Discussion

Hypoxia is an important characteristic of malignant solid tumors and is considered a possible causative factor for serious resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy. The exploration of novel fluorescent probes capable of detecting hypoxia in solid tumors will aid tumor diagnosis and treatment. Previous work has revealed that electron deficiency of azo group will accelerate the chemical reactivity of azo compounds with reducing agents. To avoid the chemical reduction of azo group, we designed a series of azo-based Ir(III) complexes, in which Ir1-Ir4 are non-substituted azobenzene derivatives (R = H), while Ir5-Ir8 contain electron-donating dimethyl amino group (R = N(CH3)2). All these Ir(III) complexes are non-phosphorescent, because of azo bond quenching effect. As expected, they could not be reduced by chemical reducing agents, such as thiols, sodium ascorbate, sulfide or sulfite, but are capable of being reduced by endogenous bioreductases under hypoxia. The capability of being reduced by bioreductases is related with the first redox potentials of azo bond (φ (azo0/−1)), in which terms it is less negative in that R = H than that R = N(CH3)2, and it follows the order of Ir1 > Ir3 > Ir4 > Ir2, and Ir5 > Ir7 > Ir6 > Ir8. However, Ir1 shows the weakest phosphorescence intensity after biological reduction. We speculate that axial ligands of Ir1, as well as Ir5, are di-fluorine containing, which provide rich hydrogen bonding environment and make Ir1 and Ir5 accessible to other proteins. On another side, the corresponding reduced amino products (IrNH21-IrNH24) are highly phosphorescent (quantum yields and lifetimes are listed in table S3. Except for IrNH21, IrNH23 exhibits largest quantum yield value of 0.142 in aqueous solution. These facts could explain why Ir3 and Ir7 exhibit much stronger phosphorescence intensity than others.

T. Nagano and K. Hanaoka have developed azo-based turn-on fluorescent probes to obtain images of the hypoxic level in hypoxic cells, branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO) and ligated mice25,39, yet not in a 3D multicellular spheroids model. 3D multicellular spheroids model is more reliable than hypoxic cultured adherent cells to study the hypoxia, by generating a hypoxic environment without specialized hypoxic chambers and providing cell-cell, cell-matrix interaction. Because of the inadequate supply of oxygen and nutrients, 3D multicellular spheroids exhibit diffusive gradients of DNA breaks, ATP distribution and enzyme activity, besides oxygen gradient42. To image hypoxia using bioreductase-reactive compounds is of high value to distinguish the long-term hypoxia of solid tumor with acute hypoxia. In the presented work, we employ cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes as phosphores, which posses advantages over organic fluorescent probes, such as evident Stokes shift, strong anti-photobleaching, tunable phosphorescence and relative long phosphorescent lifetime54. By changing the chemical structures of the axial C^N ligands, the turn-on emissive colors of the complexes can be tuned from green to red, showing multicolor phosphorescent probes for hypoxia and expanding hypoxia imaging application. Remarkable performance of the complexes was exhibited for the detection of a hypoxia environment not only in adherent living cells but also in oxygen-gradient 3D multicellular spheroids at depths of over 100 μm, which have many similarities to the in vivo environment. Thus, the probes Ir1-Ir8 are practical and useful tools for studying hypoxia in solid tumors, which is crucial for guiding the subsequent therapeutic decisions, as well as for investigating a variety of hypoxia-related biological phenomena. Further work on the long phosphorescent lifetime complexes for phosphorescence lifetime imaging (PLIM) of hypoxia is ongoing in our lab.

Methods

General Procedure

All of the reagents were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification unless otherwise specified. All of the buffer components were of biological grade and were used as received. All experiments were done according to institutional ethical guidelines on animal care, and all experimental protocols received prior approval by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Sun Yat-Sen University. IrCl3, 2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)pyridine (dfppy), 2-phenylpyridine (ppy), 2-phenylquinoline (2-pq), 2,2′-bipyridin-4-amine (bpy-NH2) 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and diphenyliodonium chloride (DPI) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and were used without further purification. Twice-distilled water was used throughout all of the experiments. The ligandsdibenzo[f,h]quinoxaline (dbq)55, 2,2′-bipyridin-4-amine (bpy-NH2)56, cyclometalated Ir(III) chloro-bridged dimer [Ir(C^N)2Cl]2 (C^N = dfppy, ppy, 2-pq or dbq)57, [Ir(ppy)2(bpy-NH2)]Cl (IrNH22) and [Ir(2-pq)2(bpy-NH2)]Cl (IrNH23)58 were synthesized according to literature methods. Electrospray ionization mass spectra (ESI-MS) were recorded on a LCQ system (Finnigan MAT, USA) in positive mode. The 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Mercury-Plus 500 spectrometer (500 MHz), and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a 500 MHz Superconducting Fourier Transform Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrometer (Varian, INOVA500NB). All of the chemical shifts are reported relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS). Electronic absorption spectra were recorded using a Perkin-Elmer Lambda850 UV/Vis spectrometer. Emission spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer LS 55 luminescence spectrometer at room temperature. The Cyclic voltammetry measurements were performed on a CHI 660A electrochemical workstation. All samples were dissolved in CH3CN and were purged with Ar; in addition, 0.1 M tetrabutylammonium perchlorate (TBAP) was used as a supporting electrolyte. A standard three-electrode system composed of a glassy carbon working electrode, a Pt-wire auxiliary electrode and a saturated calomel reference electrode (SCE) was used. The scan rate was 0.1 V·s−1. The IR spectra were recorded on an EQUINOX 55 Fourier transformation infra-red spectrometer (Bruker, German) in KBr pellets over a range of 400–4000 cm−1. The pH measurements were obtained with a Sartorius PB-10 pH meter.

Synthesis of 4-(phenyldiazenyl)-2,2′-bipyridine (p-azobpy)

Pyridine (3 mL) and 5 mL of 50% NaOH were heated with 2,2′-bipyridine-4-amine (1.0 mmol) to 80 °C. Isonitrosobenzene (1.5 mmol) was added over a 30 min period. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight and then cooled at room temperature. The solvent was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The crude mixture was then purified by column chromatography on silica using CHCl3/CH3OH (v/v, 50:1) as eluent to obtain the product as a claybank solid (466.3 mg, 89.7%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.93 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 8.74 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 1H), 8.69 (s, 1H), 8.46 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (ddd, J = 9.5, 4.5, 3.0 Hz, 3H), 7.84 (dd, J = 5.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.70–7.62 (m, 4H), 7.54–7.46 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 158.2, 157.9, 155.0, 152.3, 151.8, 149.9, 137.9, 133.4, 130.2, 129.0, 125.2, 123.7, 121.2, 118.4, 117.6, 112.1. FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm−1): ν(N = N) 1448.0, m. ESI-MS (m/z): [M+H]+ calculated for C16H12N4, 261.1; found, 261.1.

Synthesis of 4-(2,2′-bipyridin-4-yldiazenyl)-N,N-dimethylaniline (dmap-azobpy)

NaNO2 (2.1 mmol) and 2, 2′-bipyridin-4-amine (2.0 mmol) were dissolved in water (10 mL). The mixture was then cooled to 2 °C. Cold concentrated HCl (800 μL) was added slowly to ensure that the temperature was below 5 °C. The mixture was stirred for another 10 min and then added dropwise into a dimethylaniline/acetic acid/water (0.2 mL/1 mL/20 mL) solution incubated in an ice bath. A bright red precipitate was generated immediately. After this addition, the mixture was stirred overnight, and the precipitate was collected by filtering, washing with cold water and then drying under reduced pressure obtain the product as a dark red solid (576.2 mg, 95.1%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.81 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 8.78 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.76 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 8.52 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.97 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.87 (td, J = 7.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.72 (dd, J = 5.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (dd, J = 6.5, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 3.14 (s, 6H).13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.8, 156.9, 155.1, 153.6, 149.4, 143.8, 137.1, 126.3, 124.1, 121.6, 116.1, 114.3, 111.5, 40.3. FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm−1): ν(N = N) 1452.9, m; ν(-CH3) 2919.7, s. ESI-MS (m/z): [M+H]+ calculated for C18H17N5, 304.1; found, 304.1.

Synthesis of [Ir(dfppy)2(p-azobpy)]Cl (Ir1)

A mixture of [Ir(dfppy)2Cl]2 (61 mg, 0.05 mmol) and the p-azobpy ligand (39 mg, 0.15 mmol ) was suspended in 20 mL MeOH/CHCl3 (1:1, v/v) and heated at 65 °C for 6 h under argon. The solution was filtered, and the precipitate was washed thrice with 2 mL cold methanol. The filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure to remove the solvent. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on alumina using dichloromethane and acetone (5:1, v/v) as the eluent, obtaining an orange-yellow powder (56.7 mg, 68.1%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.29 (s, 1H), 9.18 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.37 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.33 (dd, J = 8.5, 4.5 Hz, 2H), 8.13 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 8.08 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.03 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.99 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 7.89 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 7.85–7.67 (m, 5H), 7.35–7.23 (m, 2H), 7.01 (t, J = 11.0 Hz, 2H), 5.66 (ddd, J = 8.0, 5.5, 2.5 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 171.9, 164.4, 164.3, 163.2, 163.1, 162.3, 162.3, 162.2, 160.2, 160.1, 158.8, 157.9, 155.3, 154.9, 154.8, 154.7, 152.5, 152.3, 150.8, 150.5, 150.3, 140.8, 140.6, 134.4, 130.4, 130.2, 129.9, 128.1, 126.4, 125.1, 123.9, 120.6, 119.4, 113.8, 113.7, 99.8, 99.6, 99.4. FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm−1): ν(N = N) 1429.7, m. ESI-MS (m/z) [M-Cl]+ calculated for C38H24F4IrN6, 833.1; found, 833.4.

Synthesis of [Ir(ppy)2(p-azobpy)]Cl (Ir2)

This complex was synthesized by a method identical to that described for the preparation of Ir1, except that [Ir(ppy)2Cl]2 (54 mg, 0.05 mmol) was used instead of [Ir(dfppy)2Cl]2. Ir2 was isolated as a yellow powder (45.1 mg, 59.3%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.23 (s, 1H), 9.12 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.30 (dd, J = 15.0, 7.5 Hz, 3H), 8.06 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 7.99 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H), 7.97–7.92 (m, 4H), 7.91 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 7.66 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (dt, J = 12.5, 6.0 Hz, 2H), 7.03 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 6.92 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 6.21 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 167.3, 167.2, 158.6, 158.1, 155.6, 152.3, 152.1, 150.8, 150.7, 150.4, 149.8, 149.5, 144.3, 140.3, 139.3, 134.3, 131.5, 130.8, 130.4, 129.5, 126.2, 125.6, 124.5, 123.9, 122.9, 120.5, 119.0. FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm−1): ν(N = N) 1437.3, m. ESI-MS (m/z) [M-Cl]+ calculated for C38H28IrN6, 761.2; found, 761.3.

Synthesis of [Ir(2-pq)2(p-azobpy)]Cl (Ir3)

This complex was synthesised by a method identical to that described for the preparation of Ir1, except that [Ir(2-pq)2Cl]2 (64 mg, 0.05 mmol) was used instead of [Ir(dfppy)2Cl]2. Ir3 was isolated as an orange-yellow powder (52.3 mg, 60.7%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.84 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.70 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.65–8.54 (m, 4H), 8.32 (dd, J = 13.5, 6.5 Hz, 3H), 8.20–8.08 (m, 2H), 8.04–7.89 (m, 5H), 7.69 (ddd, J = 27.0, 13.5, 6.5 Hz, 4H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (dd, J = 13.5, 7.0 Hz, 3H), 7.13–7.06 (m, 1H), 6.84 (dd, J = 14.0, 7.0 Hz, 2H), 6.43 (dd, J = 15.5, 7.5 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.2, 170.1, 158.4, 157.6, 155.0, 152.2, 151.1, 151.1, 149.6, 147.9, 147.2, 146.2, 141.0, 140.4, 134.4, 134.2, 134.1, 131.7, 131.5, 131.1, 130.3, 129.9, 129.4, 129.3, 128.7, 128.3, 128.2, 127.9, 127.9, 127.3, 125.3, 124.5, 124.4, 123.9, 123.3, 120.2, 118.8, 118.7, 118.1. FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm−1): ν(N = N) 1443.2, m. ESI-MS (m/z) [M-Cl]+ calculated for C46H32IrN6, 861.2; found, 861.3.

Synthesis of [Ir(dbq)2(p-azobpy)]Cl (Ir4)

This complex was synthesised by a method identical to that described for the preparation of Ir1, except that [Ir(dbq)2Cl]2 (69 mg, 0.05 mmol) was used instead of [Ir(dfppy)2Cl]2. Ir4 was isolated as an orange-yellow powder (48.8 mg, 53.6%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.29 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 9.18 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 3H), 8.88 (dd, J = 8.5, 3.0 Hz, 2H), 8.83 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.40 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H), 8.38–8.31 (m, 3H), 8.21 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 7.97 (dd, J = 19.5, 7.0 Hz, 5H), 7.92–7.85 (m, 3H), 7.69 (dd, J = 16.5, 9.0 Hz, 4H), 7.32 (td, J = 8.0, 2.5 Hz, 2H), 6.47 (dd, J = 7.5, 2.0 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 158.9, 158.5, 155.9, 153.3, 152.3, 151.6, 148.9, 148.7, 146.2, 146.2, 143.7, 143.5, 142.9, 140.7, 138.0, 137.9, 134.4, 132.8, 132.5, 131.9, 131.4, 130.4, 129.8, 129.0, 128.8, 125.3, 124.5, 123.9, 119.1, 117.1, 69.9. FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm−1): ν(N = N) 1443.7, m. ESI-MS (m/z) [M-Cl]+ calculated for C48H30IrN8, 911.2; found, 911.3.

Synthesis of [Ir(dfppy)2(dmap-azobpy)]Cl (Ir5)

This complex was synthesized by a method identical to that described for the preparation of Ir1, except that the ligand dmap-azobpy (46 mg, 0.15 mmol) was used instead of ligand p-azobpy. Ir5 was isolated as a red powder (58.2 mg, 66.4%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.09 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 9.05 (s, 1H), 8.32 (dd, J = 12.5, 6.5 Hz, 3H), 8.06 (dd, J = 12.0, 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.94 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H), 7.90 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 7.84 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 2H), 7.74 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 7.30–7.23 (m, 2H), 6.99 (dd, J = 12.5, 9.5 Hz, 2H), 6.93 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 5.67–5.61 (m, 2H), 3.17 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.4, 163.2, 163.2, 162.3, 162.2, 160.2, 160.1, 159.8, 157.2, 155.7, 155.4, 155.3, 155.1, 154.9, 151.8, 150.7, 150.3, 150.1, 143.5, 140.7, 140.5, 129.7, 128.1, 127.4, 126.1, 125.1, 123.9, 123.8, 119.8, 118.7, 113.8, 113.6, 112.5, 99.7, 99.5, 99.3. FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm−1): ν(N = N) 1430.1, m; ν(-CH3) 2915.9, s. ESI-MS (m/z) [M-Cl]+ calculated for C40H29F4IrN7, 876.2; found, 876.3.

Synthesis of [Ir(ppy)2(dmap-azobpy)]Cl (Ir6)

This complex was synthesized by a method identical to that described for the preparation of Ir1, except that [Ir(ppy)2Cl]2 (54 mg, 0.05 mmol) was used instead of [Ir(dfppy)2Cl]2, and the ligand dmap-azobpy (46 mg, 0.15 mmol) was used instead of ligand p-azobpy. Ir6 was isolated as a red powder (43.8 mg, 54.5%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.07 (s, 1H), 9.00 (s, 1H), 8.41 (s, 1H), 8.19 (s, 2H), 7.95 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 7.91 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (s, 3H), 7.71 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (s, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 2H), 7.04 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 4H), 6.92 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 4H), 6.32 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.31 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.0, 167.9, 156.9, 155.7, 151.2, 150.5, 150.3, 150.1, 148.5, 143.4, 140.6, 138.2, 131.8, 131.7, 130.9, 128.5, 125.8, 124.9, 123.4, 123.3, 122.7, 119.8, 118.7, 116.3, 115.4, 113.8, 41.3. FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm−1): ν(N = N) 1444.5, m; ν(-CH3) 2921.8, s. ESI-MS (m/z) [M-Cl]+ calculated for C40H33IrN7, 804.2; found, 804.3.

Synthesis of [Ir(2-pq)2(dmap-azobpy)]Cl (Ir7)

This complex was synthesized by a method identical to that described for the preparation of Ir1, except that [Ir(2-pq)2Cl]2 (64 mg, 0.05 mmol) was used instead of [Ir(dfppy)2Cl]2, and the ligand dmap-azobpy (46 mg, 0.15 mmol) was used instead of ligand p-azobpy. Ir7 was isolated as a dark red powder (56.8 mg, 62.8%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.59 (tt, J = 14.5, 8.5 Hz, 6H), 8.31 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.11 (dd, J = 15.5, 7.0 Hz, 3H), 7.94 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.81 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 3H), 7.73–7.65 (m, 1H), 7.42 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (dd, J = 13.0, 6.5 Hz, 3H), 7.09 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 6.83 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.43 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.14 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 170.2, 159.3, 157.0, 155.6, 154.9, 151.7, 151.4, 148.8, 147.7, 147.3, 147.2, 146.3, 143.3, 140.9, 140.3, 134.2, 134.2, 131.6, 131.4, 131.1, 129.9, 128.9, 128.2, 127.9, 127.3, 127.2, 125.1, 124.7, 124.5, 123.2, 119.3, 118.7, 117.4, 112.5. FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm−1): ν(N = N) 1444.0, m; ν(-CH3) 2917.9, s. ESI-MS (m/z) [M-Cl]+ calculated for C48H37IrN7, 904.3; found, 904.3.

Synthesis of [Ir(dbq)2(dmap-azobpy)]Cl (Ir8)

This complex was synthesized by a method identical to that described for the preparation of Ir1, except that [Ir(dbq)2Cl]2 (69 mg, 0.05 mmol) was used instead of [Ir(dfppy)2Cl]2, and the ligand dmap-azobpy (46 mg, 0.15 mmol) was used instead of ligand p-azobpy. Complex Ir8 was isolated as a dark red powder (53.6 mg, 56.2%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.19–9.07 (m, 4H), 8.87 (dd, J = 7.0, 3.0 Hz, 2H), 8.82 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.33 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 8.21 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H), 7.95–7.92 (m, 3H), 7.87 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 4H), 7.75 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 7.69–7.61 (m, 1H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 6.90 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 6.67 (s, 1H), 6.46 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 3.14 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 171.6, 159.7, 157.8, 156.3, 154.9, 152.6, 151.6, 149.0, 146.2, 143.4, 142.9, 140.6, 137.9, 132.8, 132.5, 131.9, 131.4, 129.8, 129.5, 128.9, 128.8, 125.3, 124.5, 119.9, 118.5, 117.0, 112.5, 23.0. FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm−1): ν(N = N) 1443.0, m; ν(-CH3) 2923.7, s. ESI-MS (m/z) [M-Cl]+ calculated for C50H35IrN9, 954.3; found, 954.3.

Synthesis of [Ir(dfppy)2(bpy-NH2)]Cl (IrNH21)

This complex was synthesized by a method identical to that described for the preparation of Ir1, except that the ligand bpy-NH2 (26 mg, 0.15 mmol) was used instead of ligand p-azobpy. IrNH21 was isolated as a green-yellow powder (43.6 mg, 58.6%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.43 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.32–8.23 (m, 3H), 8.04 (dd, J = 14.5, 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.87 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 1H), 7.84–7.73 (m, 2H), 7.68 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 7.66–7.62 (m, 1H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.17 (m, 4H), 6.92 (t, J = 14.0 Hz, 2H), 6.70 (dd, J = 6.5, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 5.64 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 5.58 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.5 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 163.6, 163.2, 162.1, 157.0, 156.7, 156.4, 155.9, 154.8, 150.5, 149.8, 149.7, 149.4, 140.4, 140.3, 140.2, 128.9, 128.3, 127.9, 124.9, 124.4, 123.8, 123.7, 123.7, 123.6, 113.9, 113.8, 113.6, 113.4, 112.5, 109.5, 99.2, 99.1. FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm−1): ν(-NH2) 3443.0, s. ESI-MS (m/z) [M-Cl]+ calculated for C32H21F4IrN5, 744.1; found, 744.3.

Synthesis of [Ir(dbq)2(bpy-NH2)]Cl (IrNH24)

This complex was synthesized by a method identical to that described for the preparation of Ir1, except that [Ir(dbq)2Cl]2 (69 mg, 0.05 mmol) was used instead of [Ir(dfppy)2Cl]2, and the ligand bpy-NH2 (26 mg, 0.15 mmol) was used instead of ligand p-azobpy. IrNH24 was isolated as a red powder (42.2 mg, 51.3%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.24–9.16 (m, 2H), 8.91 (dd, J = 26.0, 2.5 Hz, 2H), 8.82 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.50 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.36–8.25 (m, 4H), 8.20 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H), 7.95 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.92–7.85 (m, 3H), 7.82 (s, 1H), 7.63–7.54 (m, 1H), 7.36–7.20 (m, 5H), 6.62 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 6.47 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.42 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 157.0, 156.9, 155.4, 152.1, 151.9, 151.3, 150.4, 150.1, 149.7, 146.2, 146.1, 143.1, 142.8, 142.7, 140.4, 138.2, 137.8, 132.9, 132.5, 132.4, 131.9, 131.8, 131.4, 129.9, 129.6, 129.0, 128.8, 128.7, 125.3, 124.5, 124.4, 116.7, 116.6, 112.4, 109.5, 79.7. FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm−1): ν(-NH2) 3464.2, s. ESI-MS (m/z) [M-Cl]+ calculated for C42H27IrN7, 822.2; found, 822.3.

X-ray crystallography

Single crystals of Ir1 that were suitable for an X-ray crystallographic study were grown from dichloromethane-toluene (1:1, v/v) at room temperature. An orange crystal was recorded on a Rigaku R-AXIS SPIDER IP diffractometer (MoKα, λ = 0.71073 Å) at 150(2) K. An absorption correction was applied using SADABS program59. The structure solution and full-matrix least-squares refinement based on F2 for Ir1 were performed with the SHELXS-2014 and SHELXL-2014 program60, respectively, incorporated into the OLEX2 program package. Anisotropic thermal parameters were applied to all of the non-hydrogen atoms. All of the hydrogen atoms were included in calculated positions and were refined with isotropic thermal parameters riding on those of the parent atoms. Detailed crystallographic data for the crystal structural analysis were deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC 1046980 (Ir1), containing the supplementary crystallographic data for the present study. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

In vitro enzyme assay

Microsomes were prepared according to the method of Omura and Sato61. Rats (Wistar, Inline graphic 6 ~ 7 weeks) fasted overnight and were sacrificed by an intraperitoneal injection of 80 mg/kg pentobarbitalsodium. The liver containing 0.15 M KCl aq. (pH 7.4) was homogenized in three volumes of the same buffer. The hypoxic condition was generated by bubbling argon gas into the reaction solution for 30 minutes. Rat liver microsomes (0.25 mg protein/mL) and 50 μM NADPH were pre-incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. A phosphorescence probe (2.5 μM) containing 0.1% DMSO was added as a co-solvent. The initial reaction rate under hypoxia was determined by the initial slope of the time-dependent phosphorescence intensity change. The reaction mixture after the in vitro enzyme assay was extracted by chloroform and analyzed by ESI-MS.

Cell culture

The HeLa cells were obtained from the ATCC and were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% inactivated fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco, USA). The cell lines were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2. Cell lines were used within two months after resuscitation of frozen aliquots thawed from liquid nitrogen.

D multicellular spheroid formation

3D multicellular spheroids were formed in agarose-coated 96-well plates as previously described6264. Two hundred microliters of a 2.5 × 104 cells/mL single cell suspension was plated onto agarose-coated (sterile, 0.75% (w/v) in PBS) 96-well imaging plates. The cells were allowed to aggregate for 96 h without motion, resulting in the formation of single spheroids with diameters of 400–500 μm per well. The small cell spheroids (diameters of 100–150 μm) were formed by the addition 200 μL of a 2.5 × 103 cells/mL single cell suspension that was allowed to aggregate for 48 h.

Cytotoxicity assay

Adherent 2D cell viability was measured using the MTT assay. Cells were plated at a density of 5 × 103 cells/well in 96-well plates and incubated under standard culturing conditions for 24 h. Test compounds were then added at the indicated concentrations to quadruplicate wells. Control wells were prepared by the addition of culture medium. Wells containing culture medium without cells were used as blanks. The plates were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 12 h. Upon completion of the incubation, stock MTT dye solution (20 mL, 5 mg/mL) was added to each well. After additional 4 h incubation, 150 μL of DMSO was added to dissolve the MTT formazan. The optical density of each well was then measured on a microplate reader at a wavelength of 590 nm. The cytotoxicities of the probes to the 3D multicellular spheroids were evaluated using a cell spheroid growth inhibition assay63,64. The spheroids 400–500 μm in diameter were incubated with 2.5 μM Ir(III) complexes for 48 h. As an indication of spheroid proliferation, the diameters of the spheroids were measured with an inverted fluorescence microscope (Zeiss) after 6, 12, 24 and 48 h, and images were obtained.

Cellular imaging

HeLa cells seeded on 35 mm glass-bottomed dishes were cultured overnight before the assay. Cells incubated under normoxic (20% O2) or hypoxic (1% O2 concentration cultured with or without DPI) conditions for 6 h were then treated with the Ir(III) complexes (final concentration 2.5 μM) for 30 min under the same conditions as the pre-culture. After washing the cells twice with phosphate buffer, phosphorescence images were captured using a Zeiss LSM 710 NLO confocal microscope (63 × /NA 1.4 oil immersion objective). The excitation wavelength of the laser was 405 nm, and the emission spectra were integrated over the range of 490–670 nm.3D multicellular spheroids with diameters of approximately 400–500 μm were harvested after approximately 4 days of growth. Test compounds were then added to the wells to achieve final concentrations of 2.5 μM and incubated for another 6 h. The cell spheroids were gently washed twice with phosphate buffer and imaged using a confocal microscope (10 × /NA 0.40 air objective lens).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Sun, L. et al. Azo-Based Iridium(III) Complexes as Multicolor Phosphorescent Probes to Detect Hypoxia in 3D Multicellular Tumor Spheroids. Sci. Rep. 5, 14837; doi: 10.1038/srep14837 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep14837-s1.doc (6.2MB, doc)

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the 973 program (Nos. 2014CB845604 and 2015CB856301), the National Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21172273, 21171177, and 21471164), and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team at the University of China (No. IRT1298).

Footnotes

Author Contributions L.S. and G.L. carried out all the experiments, L.S., G.L., X.C., Y.C., C.J. and L.J. performed the data analysis; L.S., G.L. and H.C. designed the experiments, analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript.

References

  1. Minchinton A. I. & Tannock I. F. Drug Penetration in Solid Tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 6, 583–592 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Koch S., Mayer F., Honecker F., Schittenhelm M. & Bokemeyer C. Efficacy of Cytotoxic Agents Used in the Treatment of Testicular Germ Cell Tumours Under Normoxic and Hypoxic Conditions in Vitro. Br. J. Cancer. 89, 2133–2139 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Harris A. L. Hypoxia—A Key Regulatory Factor in Tumour Growth. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2, 38–47 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kizaka-Kondoh S., Inoue M., Harada H. & Hiraoka M. Tumor Hypoxia: A Target for Selective Cancer Therapy. Cancer. Sci. 94, 1021–1028 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. He F. et al. Noninvasive Molecular Imaging of Hypoxia in Human Xenografts: Comparing Hypoxia-Induced Gene Expression with Endogenous and Exogenous Hypoxia Markers. Cancer. Res. 68, 8597–8606 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wilson W. R. & Hay M. P. Targeting Hypoxia in Cancer Therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 11, 393–410 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stern S. & Guichard M. Efficacy of Agents Counteracting Hypoxia in Fractionated Radiation Regimes. Radio. Oncol. 41, 143–149 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Daşu A. & Denekamp J. Superfractionation as A Potential Hypoxic Cell Radiosensitizer: Prediction of An Optimum Dose Per Fraction. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 43, 1083–1094 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhu W., Dai M., Xu Y. & Qian X. Novel Nitroheterocyclic Hypoxic Markers for Solid Tumor: Synthesis and Biological Evaluation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 16, 3255–3260 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dai M. et al. Versatile Nitro-Fluorophore as Highly Effective Sensor for Hypoxic Tumor Cells: Design, Imaging and Evaluation. J. Fluoresc. 18, 591–597 (2008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kobayashi H., Ogawa M., Alford R., Choyke P. L. & Urano Y. New Strategies for Fluorescent Probe Design in Medical Diagnostic Imaging. Chem. Rev. 110, 2620–2640 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kikuchi K. Design, Synthesis and Biological Application of Chemical Probes for Bio-imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 2048–2053 (2010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Apte S., Chin F. T. & Graves E. E. Molecular Imaging of Hypoxia: Strategies for Probe Design and Application. Curr. Org. Synth. 8, 593–603 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu K. et al. High Selectivity Imaging of Nitroreductase Using a Near-infrared Fluorescence Probe in Hypoxic Tumor. Chem. Commun. 49, 2554–2556 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Li Z. et al. Nitroreductase Detection and Hypoxic Tumor Cell Imaging by A Designed Sensitive and Selective Fluorescent Probe, 7-[(5-Nitrofuran-2-yl) methoxy]-3H-phenoxazin-3-one. Anal. Chem. 85, 3926–3932 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li Z., Gao X., Shi W., Li X. & Ma H. 7-((5-Nitrothiophen-2-yl)methoxy) -3H-phenoxazin-3-one as a Spectroscopic Off-on Probe for Highly Sensitive and Selective Detection of Nitroreductase. Chem. Commun. 49, 5859–5861 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Li Z. et al. In Vivo Imaging and Detection of Nitroreductase in Zebrafish by A New Near-infrared Fluorescence Off-on Probe. Biosens. Bioelectron. 63, 112–116 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Guo T. et al. A Highly Sensitive Long-wavelength Fluorescence Probe for Nitroreductase and Hypoxia: Selective Detection and Quantification. Chem. Commun. 49, 10820–10822 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yuan J. et al. A Highly Selective Turn-on Fluorescent Probe Based on Semi-cyanine for The Detection of Nitroreductase and Hypoxic Tumor Cell Imaging. RSC. Advances. 4, 56207–56210 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  20. Jiang Q. et al. A Novel Nitro-Substituted Benzothiadiazole as Fluorescent Probe for Tumor Cells Under Hypoxic Condition. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 21, 7735–7741 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang P. et al. Ruthenium(II) Anthraquinone Complexes as Two-photon Luminescent Probes for Cycling Hypoxia Imaging in vivo. Biomaterials 53, 522–531 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Komatsu H., Harada H., Tanabe K., Hiraoka M. & Nishimoto S. Indolequinone-rhodol Conjugate as A Fluorescent Probe for Hypoxic Cells: Enzymatic Activation and Fluorescence Properties. Med. Chem. Comm. 1, 50–53 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  23. Komatsu H., Shindo Y., Oka K., Hill J. P. & Ariga K. Ubiquinone-Rhodol (UQ-Rh) for Fluorescence Imaging of NAD(P)H through Intracellular Activation. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 53, 3993–3995 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chevalier A. et al. The First Latent Green Fluorophores for the Detection of Azoreductase Activity in Bacterial Cultures. Chem. Commun. 49, 8815–8817 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kiyose K. et al. Hypoxia-Sensitive Fluorescent Probes for in Vivo Real-Time Fluorescence Imaging of Acute Ischemia. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 15846–15848 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lednev I. K. et al. Femtosecond Time-Resolved UV-Visible Absorption Spectroscopy of Trans-Azobenzene: Dependence on Excitation Wavelength. Chem. Phys. Lett. 290, 68–74 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  27. Poprawa-Smoluch M. et al. Photoisomerization of Disperse Red 1 Studied with Transient Absorption Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Calculations. J. Phys. Chem. A. 110, 11926–11937 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yoshino J., Kano N. & Kawashima T. Synthesis of the Most Intensely Fluorescent Azobenzene by Utilizing the B-N Interaction. Chem. Commun. 43, 559–561 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Bandara H. M. D. & Burdette S. C. Photoisomerization in Different Classes of Azobenzene. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 1809–1825 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rattray N. J. et al. Fluorescent Probe for Detection of Bacteria: Conformational Trigger upon Bacterial Reduction of an Azo Bridge. Chem. Commun. 48, 6393–6395 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sharma R., Rawal R. K., Malhotra M., Sharma A. K. & Bhardwaj T. R. Design, Synthesis and ex-Vivo Release Studies of Colon-Specific Polyphosphazene-Anticancer Drug Conjugates. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 22, 1104–1114 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hamidian H. et al. Synthesis of Novel Azo Compounds Containing 5(4H)-Oxazolone Ring as Potent Tyrosinase Inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 21, 2088–2092 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mazumder U. K. et al. Synthesis and Pharmacological Activities of Some Mononuclear Ru(II) Complexes. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 13, 5766–5773 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li X., Cheng J., Gong Y., Yang B. & Hu Y. Mapping Hydrogen Sulfide in Rats with A novel Azo-based Fluorescent Probe. Biosens. Bioelectron. 65, 302–306 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Li G. Y. et al. Colorimetric and Lluminescent Dual-signaling Responsive Probing of Thiols by A Ruthenium(II)-azo Complex. J. Inorg. Biochem. 121, 108–113 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Li G., Chen Y., Wu J., Ji L. & Chao H. Thiol-Specific Phosphorescent Imaging in Living Cells with An Azobis(2,2′-bipyridine)-Bridged Dinuclear Iridium(III) Complex. Chem. Commun. 49, 2040–2042 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Li G. et al. A Dinuclear Iridium(III) Complex as A Visual Specific Phosphorescent Probe for Endogenous Sulphite and Bisulphite in Living Cells. Chem. Sci. 4, 4426–4433 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  38. Uddin M. I. et al. Applications of Azo-Based Probes for Imaging Retinal Hypoxia. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 6, 445–449 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Piao W. et al. Development of Azo-Based Fluorescent Probes to Detect Different Levels of Hypoxia. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 52, 13028–13032 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu J. et al. Ultrasensitive Nanosensors Based on Upconversion Nanoparticles for Selective Hypoxia Imaging in Vivo upon Near-Infrared Excitation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 9701–9709 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pampaloni F., Reynaud E. G. & Stelzer E. H. K. The Third Dimension Bridges the Gap between Cell Culture and Live Tissue. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 839–845 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hirschhaeuser F. et al. Multicellular Tumor Spheroids: An Underestimated Tool Is Catching Up Again. J. Biotechnol. 148, 3–15 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mehta G., Hsiao A. Y., Ingram M., Luker G. D. & Takayama S. Opportunities and Challenges for Use of Tumor Spheroids as Models to Test Drug Delivery and Efficacy. J. Control. Release. 164, 192–204 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Curcio E. et al. Mass Transfer and Metabolic Reactions in Hepatocyte Spheroids Cultured in Rotating Wall Gas-Permeable Membrane System. Biomaterials 28, 5487–5497 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Dmitriev R. I., Zhdanov A. V., Nolan Y. M. & Papkovsky D. B. Imaging of Neurosphere Oxygenation with Phosphorescent Probes. Biomaterials 34, 9307–9317 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Dmitriev R. I. et al. Small Molecule Phosphorescent Probes for O2 Imaging in 3D Tissue Models. Biomaterials Sci. 2, 853–866 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Chen Y., Qiao L., Ji L. & Chao H. Phosphorescent Iridium(III) Complexes as Multicolor Probes for Specific Mitochondrial Imaging and Tracking. Biomaterials 35, 2–13 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Chen Y. et al. Mitochondria-Specific Phosphorescent Imaging and Tacking in Living Cells with An AIPE-Active Iridium(III) Complex. Chem. Commun. 49, 11095–11097 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. O’Donnell V., Smith G. & Jones O. Involvement of Phenyl Radicals in Iodonium Inhibition of Flavoenzymes. Mol. Pharm. 46, 778–785 (1994). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Chakraborty S. & Massey V. Reaction of Reduced Flavins and Flavoproteins with Diphenyliodonium Chloride. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 41507–41516 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Bryce N. S., Zhang J. Z., Whan R. M., Yamamoto N. & Hambley T. W. Accumulation of an Anthraquinone and Its Platinum Complexes in Cancer Cell Spheroids: the Effect of Charge on Drug Distribution in Solid Tumour Models. Chem. Commun. 45, 2673–2675 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Mosmann T. Rapid Colorimetric Assay for Cellular Growth and Survival: Application to Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assays. J. Immunol. Methods. 65, 55–63 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang X. et al. Doxorubicin Delivery to 3D Multicellular Spheroids and Tumors Based on Boronic Acid-Rich Chitosan Nanoparticles. Biomaterials 34, 4667–4679 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Fernandez-Moreira V., Thorp-Greenwood F. L. & Coogan M. P. Application of d6 Transition Metal Complexes in Fluorescence Cell Imaging. Chem. Commun. 46, 186–202 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Duan J. P., Sun P. P. & Cheng C. H. New Iridium Complexes as Highly Efficient Orange-Red Emitters in Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Adv. Mater. 15, 224–228 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhou Z. G. et al. Fullerene Polypyridine Ligands: Synthesis, Ruthenium Complexes, and Electrochemical and Photophysical Properties. Chem. Eur. J. 12, 4241–4248 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sprouse S. K. K., Spellane P. J. & Watts R. J. Photophysical Effects of Metal-Carbon Sigma Bonds in Ortho-Metalated Complexes of Iridium(III) and Rhodium(III). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 6647–6653 (1984). [Google Scholar]
  58. Lo K. K. W. et al. New Luminescent Cyclometalated Iridium(III) Diimine Complexes as Biological Labeling Reagents. Inorg. Chem. 42, 6886–6897 (2003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Blessing R. H. An Empirical Correction for Absorption Anisotropy. Acta. Crystallogr. A. 51, 33–38 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Sheldrick G. M. A Short History of SHELX. Acta. Crystallogr. A 64, 112–122 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Omura T. & Sato R. The Carbon Monoxide-Binding Pigment of Liver Microsomes. I. Evidence for Its Hemoprotein Nature. J. Biol. Chem. 239, 2370–2378 (1964). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Fischbach C. R. et al. Engineering Tumors with 3D Scaffolds. Nat. Methods. 4, 855–860 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Huang H. et al. Targeting Nucleus DNA with a Cyclometalated Dipyridophenazineruthenium(II) Complex. J. Med. Chem. 57, 8971–8983 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Huang H., Zhang P., Chen H., Ji L. & Chao H. Comparison Between Polypyridyl and Cyclometalated Ruthenium(II) Complexes: Anticancer Activities Against 2D and 3D Cancer Models. Chem. Eur. J. 21, 715–725 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep14837-s1.doc (6.2MB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES