Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2015 Sep 8;5:226–240. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2015.08.036

Dataset for the quantitative proteomics analysis of the primary hepatocellular carcinoma with single and multiple lesions

Xiaohua Xing a,b, Yao Huang c, Sen Wang a,b, Minhui Chi a,b,c, Yongyi Zeng a,b,c, Lihong Chen a,b,c, Ling Li a,b,c, Jinhua Zeng a,b,c, Minjie Lin a,b, Xiao Han d, Jingfeng Liu a,b,c, Xiaolong Liu a,b,
PMCID: PMC4589833  PMID: 26543886

Abstract

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumor, which is causing the second leading cancer-related death worldwide. The tumor tissues and the adjacent noncancerous tissues obtained from HCC patients with single and multiple lesions were quantified using iTRAQ. A total of 5513 proteins (FDR of 1%) were identified which correspond to roughly 27% of the total liver proteome. And 107 and 330 proteins were dysregulated in HCC tissue with multiple lesions (MC group) and HCC tissue with a single lesion (SC group), compared with their noncancerous tissue (MN and SN group) respectively. Bioinformatics analysis (GO, KEGG and IPA) allowed these data to be organized into distinct categories. The data accompanying the manuscript on this approach (Xing et al., J. Proteomics (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.08.007[1]) have been deposited to the iProX with identifier IPX00037601.

Specifications table

Subject area Biology
More specific subject area Proteomics on the Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Type of data List of identified proteins as tables (.xls), raw data in website
How data was acquired The data was acquired by Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry in tandem (LC–MS/MS).The samples were separated by a Acquity UPLC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA) and detected by a Nano-Aquity UPLC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA) connected to a quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Q-Exactive) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany).
Data format Filtered and analyzed
Experimental factors Non-applied
Experimental features Proteins were extracted from tumor tissues of HCC patients with single and multiple lesions, iTRAQ labeled and then prepared for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) analysis.
Data source location Fuzhou, China, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University
Data accessibility Filtered and analyzed data are supplied here and raw data have also been deposited to the integrated Proteome resources (iProX) with identifier IPX00037601 (http://www.iprox.org/index).

Value of the data

  • The proteome of hepatocellular carcinoma with single and multiple lesions analyzed using iTRAQ technology.

  • A total of 5513 proteins (FDR of 1%) were identified which correspond to roughly 27% of the total liver proteome.

  • The in-depth proteomics analysis of the HCC tumor tissues with a single and multiple lesions might be useful for further study of the mechanisms.

1. Data, experimental design, materials and methods

1.1. Data and experimental design

The data show the lists of proteins identified and quantified in the HCC tumor tissues with single and multiple lesions. The tissues were divided into 4 groups: cancerous tissues from HCC patients with multiple observed lesions (MC group, n=30); surrounding noncancerous tissues from HCC patients with multiple observed lesions (MN group, n=30); cancerous tissues from primary HCC patients with a single observed lesion (SC group, n=30); surrounding noncancerous tissues from primary HCC patients with a single observed lesion (SN group, n=30). The detailed characteristics of the selected HCC patients were listed in Table 1. For each group, every 5 individual samples with equal tissue weight were mixed, and then the proteins were extracted from the mixed samples. And then the samples were labeled with the iTRAQ 8-plex reagent as follows: four groups (MC group, MN group, SC group and SN group) were labeled with 113, 114, 115 and 116 isobaric tag, respectively; and the peptides from the biological repetitions of the above 4 groups were labeled with 117, 118, 119 and 121, respectively. The iTRAQ 8-plex labeling was independently repeated 3 times, defining as A, B and C. So we have 6 repeated protein extracts for each group to minimize the individual differences of the patients.

Table 1.

Basic information and characteristics of the HCC patients with a single or multiple observed lesions, who were enrolled in this dataset.

  HCC with multiple lesions HCC with a single lesion
Gender
 Male 30 30
 Female 0 0
Age (years)
 ≤55 17 17
 >55 13 13
AFP (ng/ml)
 ≤400 12 20
 >400 18 10
Tumor size (cm)
 ≤5 9 6
 5–10 21 24
Progression of cirrhosis
 None 3 5
 Mild 13 12
 Moderate 13 12
 Severe 1 1
Tumor boundaries
 Distinct 18 22
 Indistinct 12 8
Differentiation degree
 I–II 8 4
 II–III 17 22
 III–IV 5 4
Vascular tumor thrombosis
 No 26 25
 Yes 4 5
Tumor encapsulation
 No 2 6
 Incomplete 14 10
 Complete 14 14

1.2. Materials and methods

Tissue samples, including the cancerous and surrounding noncancerous tissues, were obtained from 30 primary HCC patients with multiple observed lesions and 30 primary HCC patients with a single observed lesion, respectively. All patients have undergone radical surgery at Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University from August 2010 to January 2013. The protein from these two type HCC tissues was determined by BCA assay (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) following the manufacture’s protocol. Afterwards, 100 μg proteins per condition were treated with DTT (8 mM) and iodoacetamide (50 mM) for reduction and alkylation. Afterwards, the proteins were typically digested by sequence-grade modified trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI), and then the resultant peptides mixture was further labeled using chemicals from the iTRAQ reagent kit (AB SCIEX, USA).

The peptide mixture was fractionated by high pH separation using a Acquity UPLC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA) connected to a reverse phase column (BEH C18, 1.7 µm, 2.1×50 mm2, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA). High pH separation was performed using a linear gradient starting from 5% B to 35% B in 20 min (solution B: 20 mM ammonium formate in 90% ACN, the pH was adjusted to 10.0 with ammonium hydroxide). The column flow rate was maintained at 600 μl/min and column temperature was maintained at room temperature. Finally 40 fractions were collected, and two fractions with the same time interval were pooled together to reduce the fraction numbers, such as 1 and 21, 2 and 22, and so on [2]. Twenty fractions at the end were dried in a vacuum concentrator for further usage.

The fractions were then separated by nano-LC and analyzed by on-line electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. The experiments were performed on a Nano-Aquity UPLC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA) connected to a quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Q-Exactive) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) equipped with an online nano-electrospray ion source. 8 μl peptide sample was loaded onto the trap column (Thermo Scientific Acclaim PepMap C18, 100 μm×2 cm)with a flow of 10 μl/min, and subsequently separated on the analytical column (Acclaim PepMap C18, 75 μm×50 cm) with a linear gradient, from 2% D to 40% D in 135 min (solution D: 0.1% formic acid in ACN). The Q-Exactive mass spectrometer was operated in the data-dependent mode to switch automatically between MS and MS/MS acquisition. Survey full-scan MS spectra (m/z 350–1200) was acquired with a mass resolution of 70 K, followed by 15 sequential high energy collisional dissociation (HCD) MS/MS scans with a resolution of 17.5 K. In all cases, one microscan was recorded using dynamic exclusion of 30 s.

1.3. Data analysis

All the raw files generated by the Q-Exactive instrument were converted into mzXML and MGF files using the ms convert module in Trans-Proteomic Pipeline (TPP 4.6.2). All MGF files were searched using Mascot (Matrix Science, London, UK; version 2.3.0) against a human_database provided by The Universal Protein Resource (http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot, released at 2014-04-10, with 20,264 entries). Using the results from Scaffold_4.3.2, we quantified 5513 proteins in three iTRAQ 8-plex labeling replicates. The complete list of identified proteins in our dataset is shown in Table S1. The detailed characteristics of proteomes of the primary HCC with single and multiple lesions, including Molecular Weight (MW), Isoelectric Point (PI), Hydrophobicity, exponentially modified Protein Abundance Index (emPAI), Quantitative Clustering, Average Coefficient of Variance (CV), quantification results with percentage variability, were included in the list as well. The distribution of unique peptide numbers per protein, MW, PI and hydrophobicity also clearly showed that the overall proteome datasets of the primary HCC with single and multiple lesions had no strong bias (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The qualities of the proteome dataset. (A) Frequency distribution of the identified proteins with ≥1 unique peptides. (B) Molecular weight distribution of identified proteins proved that there is no bias in the protein extraction process. (C) Isoelectric point distribution of the identified proteins to show the unbias of the protein extraction. (D) Protein hydrophobicity distribution of the identified proteins.

2. Analysis of the dataset

2.1. The analysis of the quantitative proteomics

In this dataset, 107 and 330 proteins were classified as differentially expressed in HCC tumor tissues with single and multiple lesions compared to surrounding noncancerous tissues (Fig. 2A, B). All of the differentially expressed proteins presented a mean expression fold change of ±1.5 (log2 0.58) or even more with a p value less than 0.05 (paired T-test), meanwhile these proteins should have the same change trends in all six biological replicates. Among these differentially expressed proteins, 71 proteins altered their expression in both HCC types (Fig. 2C). GO annotation analysis showed that these proteins were the major participants in the oxidation reduction process and the cellular metabolic processes (Fig. 2D).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The iTRAQ ratio distribution and involved biological processes of the differentially expressed proteins in the HCC with single and multiple lesions. (A) Volcano plot represented the protein abundance changes in the HCC cancerous tissue with multiple lesions comparing to their adjacent noncancerous tissues. A total of 107 dysregulated proteins with fold change ≥1.5 and p values <0.05 were identified. (B) Volcano plot represented the protein abundance changes in the HCC cancerous tissues with a single lesion comparing to their adjacent noncancerous tissue. A total of 330 dysregulated proteins with fold change ≥1.5 and p values <0.05 were identified. (C) Venn diagrams showed the overlaps and number of differentially expressed proteins in the HCC with single and multiple lesions. (D) GO analysis of the involved biological processes of the common dysregulated proteins in both types of the HCC. All of the biological processes were ranked in term of enrichment of the differentially expressed proteins, and the top 10 are presented here.

2.2. Bioinformatics analysis

The Gene Ontology (GO) annotation and pathway enrichment analysis of all the identified proteins and differentially expressed proteins were implemented using the online tool DAVID (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/). The quantitative iTRAQ ratios of 36 proteins, which dysregulated in MC group comparing to MN group, but these proteins were not dysregulated in primary HCC with a single lesion, were plotted on a heatmap (Fig. 3A). The names of the dysregulated proteins are listed in Table 2. We further analyzed these protein involved biological process by GO analysis (Fig. 3C). Meanwhile, 142 up-regulated proteins and 117 down-regulated proteins were specifically appeared in HCC with a single lesion group, but not in HCC with multiple lesions group; and the up and down regulated proteins also form clearly distinct clusters in the heatmap (Fig. 3B). The list of protein names is also displayed in Table 3. We further analyzed these protein involved biological process by GO analysis (Fig. 3D). Gene ontology (GO) analysis of the molecular function and cell component of differentially expressed proteins which is only dysregulated in HCC with a single lesion or HCC with multiple lesions are also displayed in Fig. 4.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The hierarchical clustering and involved biological processes analysis of differentially expressed proteins in the primary HCC with single and multiple lesions. (A) Hierarchical clustering of the 107 dysregulated proteins in the HCC with multiple lesions (MC vs. MN). (B) Hierarchical clustering of the 330 dysregulated proteins in the HCC with a single lesion (SC vs. SN). (C, D) GO analysis of the dysregulated proteins involved biological processes in the HCC with multiple lesions (C) and in the HCC with a single lesion (D).

Table 2.

List of the differentially expressed proteins which is only dysregulated in HCC with multiple lesions.

Differentially expressed proteins Gene Fold change Fold change
MC/MN SC/SN
UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase UGP2 0.62 0.68
Bile acyl-CoA synthetase SLC27A5 0.58 0.67
Cytochrome P450 2A6 CYP2A6 0.6 0.73
Glycine dehydrogenase (decarboxylating), mitochondrial GLDC 0.65 0.72
17-Beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 13 HSD17B13 0.56 0.71
Glycogen [starch] synthase, liver GYS2 0.65 0.7
Sequestome-1 SQSTM1 1.77 1.59
4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase HPD 0.63 0.76
Kynurenine 3-monooxygenase KMO 0.56 0.76
Beta-enolase ENO3 0.64 0.71
Urocanate hydratase UROC1 0.66 0.76
Keratin, type I cytkeletal 20 KRT20 1.53 1.97
Synembryn-A RIC8A 1.56 1.4
Cadherin-related family member 2 CDHR2 0.64 0.78
Cytochrome P450 2B6 CYP2B6 0.64 0.69
NAD(P)H dehydrogenase [quinone] 1 NQO1 1.89 1.52
Anterior gradient protein 2 homolog AGR2 1.71 1.14
Peripherin PRPH 0.64 0.7
Fuce mutarotase FUOM 0.6 0.61
Coiled-coil domain-containing protein 57 CCDC57 1.54 1.4
Gangliide-induced differentiation-associated protein 1 GDAP1 1.51 1.44
Histone H1.1 HIST1H1A 1.62 1.12
Choline transporter-like protein 2 SLC44A2 0.65 0.63
RAS protein activator like-3 RASAL3 0.63 0.79
Non-histone chromomal protein HMG-17 HMGN2 3.06 1.65
FH1/FH2 domain-containing protein 1 FHOD1 1.66 1.44
Copine-6 CPNE6 0.58 0.78
Myeloblastin PRTN3 1.51 1.94
24-Hydroxycholesterol 7-alpha-hydroxylase CYP39A1 0.61 0.71
Sodium/hydrogen exchanger 10 SLC9C1 0.63 0.68
Steroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyase CYP17A1 1.57 2.15
HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, alpha chain G HLA-G 0.66 1.08
MICAL C-terminal-like protein MICALCL 0.49 0.4
Nucleolysin TIA-1 isoform p40 TIA1 0.66 0.91
Immunoglobulin-binding protein 1 IGBP1 1.57 1.63
Protein FAM171A1 FAM171A1 0.59 0.63

Table 3.

List of the differentially expressed proteins which is only dysregulated in HCC with a single lesion.

Differentially expressed proteins Gene Fold change Fold change
MC/MN SC/SN
Keratin, type II cytkeletal 8 KRT8 0.73 0.62
Keratin, type I cytkeletal 18 KRT18 0.72 0.6
Tenascin-X TNXB 0.72 0.65
C-1-tetrahydrofolate synthase, cytoplasmic MTHFD1 0.72 0.56
Trifunctional enzyme subunit beta, mitochondrial HADHB 0.91 0.6
Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase, mitochondrial ACAT1 0.78 0.61
Long-chain-fatty-acid–CoA ligase 1 ACSL1 0.72 0.65
Haptoglobin HP 0.68 0.5
3-Ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, mitochondrial ACAA2 0.81 0.5
Non-specific lipid-transfer protein SCP2 0.91 0.65
Lumican LUM 0.86 0.63
Fatty acid-binding protein, liver FABP1 0.68 0.6
d-Beta-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial BDH1 0.69 0.65
Betaine–homocysteine S-methyltransferase 1 BHMT 0.67 0.58
Putative hexokinase HKDC1 HKDC1 1.28 1.54
l-Lactate dehydrogenase A chain LDHA 1.24 1.6
Pyruvate kinase PKM PKM 1.25 1.59
X-ray repair crs-complementing protein 6 XRCC6 1.36 1.63
Enoyl-CoA hydratase, mitochondrial ECHS1 0.86 0.55
Delta(3,5)-Delta(2,4)-dienoyl-CoA isomerase, mitochondrial ECH1 0.87 0.65
ATP synthase subunit d, mitochondrial ATP5H 0.78 0.56
Laminin subunit beta-1 LAMB1 1.42 1.53
S-adenylmethionine synthase isoform type-1 MAT1A 0.74 0.66
X-ray repair crs-complementing protein 5 XRCC5 1.49 1.77
Electron transfer flavoprotein subunit alpha, mitochondrial ETFA 0.83 0.65
ATP-citrate synthase ACLY 1.16 1.7
Myeloperoxidase MPO 1.37 1.58
Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase GPI 1.14 1.83
Villin-1 VIL1 1.36 1.75
Short/branched chain specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial ACADSB 0.86 0.61
Endoplasmic reticulum resident protein 29 ERP29 0.77 0.59
Superoxide dismutase [Cu–Zn] SOD1 0.83 0.64
C4b-binding protein alpha chain C4BPA 1.24 1.62
DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 9 DNAJB9 0.81 0.45
3-Ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, peroxisomal ACAA1 0.8 0.63
Decorin DCN 0.8 0.64
Transketolase TKT 1.42 1.66
Ferritin light chain FTL 0.73 0.62
Elongation factor 1-gamma EEF1G 1.18 1.55
Cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 7 UQCRB 0.79 0.53
Transferrin receptor protein 1 TFRC 1.49 1.89
Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [NAD(+)], cytoplasmic GPD1 0.77 0.64
Peroxiredoxin-4 PRDX4 0.7 0.64
Mimecan OGN 0.77 0.62
Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6B1 COX6B1 0.79 0.58
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein 2, mitochondrial NDUFV2 0.82 0.55
Phenylalanine-4-hydroxylase PAH 0.68 0.66
6-Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, decarboxylating PGD 1.22 1.73
ATP synthase subunit O, mitochondrial ATP5O 0.93 0.66
Cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit Rieske, mitochondrial UQCRFS1 0.85 0.65
Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5B, mitochondrial COX5B 0.79 0.55
Dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 4 DHRS4 0.94 0.6
Gamma-glutamyltransferase 5 GGT5 0.67 0.6
Sulfotransferase 1A1 SULT1A1 0.81 0.58
Carboxypeptidase D CPD 1.44 1.61
Spliceome RNA helicase DDX39B DDX39B 1.18 1.53
Core histone macro-H2A.1 H2AFY 1.48 1.51
Polymerase I and transcript release factor PTRF 0.83 0.62
Apolipoprotein D APOD 0.84 0.66
ATP synthase-coupling factor 6, mitochondrial ATP5J 0.78 0.56
Glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase G6PD 1.43 1.61
2-Oxoisovalerate dehydrogenase subunit alpha, mitochondrial BCKDHA 0.83 0.63
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 beta subcomplex subunit 10 NDUFB10 0.83 0.58
Glycine N-acyltransferase GLYAT 0.73 0.6
Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5A, mitochondrial COX5A 0.82 0.59
DNA replication licensing factor MCM3 MCM3 1.5 1.62
Ribonuclease UK114 HRSP12 0.82 0.65
Phenazine biosynthesis-like domain-containing protein PBLD 0.72 0.58
Asparagine–tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic NARS 1.43 1.67
Lamin-B receptor LBR 1.36 1.68
Polypeptide N-acetylgalactaminyltransferase 2 GALNT2 1.22 1.58
Paralemmin-3 PALM3 0.71 0.63
EGF-containing fibulin-like extracellular matrix protein 1 EFEMP1 1.37 1.51
Heme-binding protein 1 HEBP1 0.83 0.54
Apolipoprotein C-III APOC3 0.92 0.66
Phosphoglucomutase-2 PGM2 1.16 1.85
Complement factor H-related protein 5 CFHR5 0.89 0.63
l-Lactate dehydrogenase B chain LDHB 1.2 1.62
Serine–tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic SARS 1.09 1.55
ATP synthase subunit e, mitochondrial ATP5I 0.79 0.56
Creatine kinase B-type CKB 0.95 1.92
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 5 NDUFA5 0.74 0.53
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron–sulfur protein 8, mitochondrial NDUFS8 0.89 0.66
Desmin DES 0.71 0.51
DNA replication licensing factor MCM6 MCM6 1.34 1.54
Serum deprivation-response protein SDPR 0.79 0.55
Acyl-coenzyme A synthetase ACSM3, mitochondrial ACSM3 0.75 0.6
Clathrin light chain B CLTB 0.88 0.65
Probable d-lactate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial LDHD 0.75 0.63
Beta-2-microglobulin B2M 0.87 0.63
Four and a half LIM domains protein 1 FHL1 0.86 0.66
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 2 NDUFA2 0.85 0.58
Perilipin-2 PLIN2 1.23 1.65
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 8 NDUFA8 0.72 0.47
Tubulointerstitial nephritis antigen-like TINAGL1 0.81 0.61
Farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase FDPS 1.37 1.6
Minor histocompatibility antigen H13 HM13 1.3 1.68
Glutathione peroxidase 1 GPX1 0.81 0.64
DNA-(apurinic or apyrimidinic site) lyase AX1 1.34 1.67
Procollagen-lysine, 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 3 PLOD3 1.15 1.58
Angiotensinogen AGT 1.14 1.55
Transmembrane protein 2 TMEM2 1.1 1.51
Alpha/beta hydrolase domain-containing protein 14B ABHD14B 0.86 0.66
EF-hand domain-containing protein D1 EFHD1 0.81 0.65
Protein mago nashi homolog 2 MAGOHB 1.3 1.73
3-Hydroxyanthranilate 3,4-dioxygenase HAAO 0.79 0.66
Cofilin-2 CFL2 0.78 0.64
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron–sulfur protein 6, mitochondrial NDUFS6 0.82 0.47
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 12 NDUFA12 0.8 0.62
Alpha-fetoprotein AFP 1.02 2.13
Proliferating cell nuclear antigen PCNA 1.43 1.62
Transmembrane 9 superfamily member 4 TM9SF4 1.35 1.54
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron–sulfur protein 5 NDUFS5 0.82 0.56
Nuclear cap-binding protein subunit 1 NCBP1 1.34 1.55
Dermatopontin DPT 0.74 0.62
Glycine N-methyltransferase GNMT 0.8 0.65
Ataxin-10 ATXN10 1.38 1.57
UPF0553 protein C9orf64 C9orf64 1.41 1.64
BRO1 domain-containing protein BROX BROX 1.38 1.51
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron–sulfur protein 4, mitochondrial NDUFS4 0.78 0.5
l-Serine dehydratase/l-threonine deaminase SDS 1.01 0.65
Protein transport protein Sec23B SEC23B 1.39 1.65
Mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit Tim8 A TIMM8A 0.82 0.56
Nicastrin NCSTN 1.29 1.53
Cytochrome P450 3A7 CYP3A7 1.38 1.94
40S ribomal protein S15 RPS15 1.08 0.55
Integrin alpha-IIb ITGA2B 1.1 0.65
Acyl-CoA:lysophosphatidylglycerol acyltransferase 1 LPGAT1 1.14 1.51
Apolipoprotein L1 APOL1 1.36 1.61
Peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerase FKBP2 FKBP2 0.9 0.66
Complement factor H-related protein 1 CFHR1 0.7 0.63
Plasma serine protease inhibitor SERPINA5 1.08 1.52
Mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit Tim13 TIMM13 0.81 0.48
Tropomodulin-1 TMOD1 0.83 0.64
Myin regulatory light polypeptide 9 MYL9 0.82 0.62
ER lumen protein retaining receptor 1 KDELR1 1.1 1.58
NAD-dependent malic enzyme, mitochondrial ME2 1.33 1.6
Ceramide synthase 2 CERS2 1.47 1.51
Monocarboxylate transporter 4 SLC16A3 1.44 1.66
Glutaredoxin-1 GLRX 0.82 0.66
Collagen alpha-6(VI) chain COL6A6 0.75 0.63
Group XIIB secretory phospholipase A2-like protein PLA2G12B 0.79 0.59
Latent-transforming growth factor beta-binding protein 2 LTBP2 1.33 1.53
Myin-7 MYH7 1.14 2.46
15 kDa selenoprotein 15-Sep 0.69 0.58
Metalloproteinase inhibitor 1 TIMP1 1.33 1.52
Protein RCC2 RCC2 1.37 1.65
NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 7 NDUFA7 0.86 0.57
Calmegin CLGN 1.41 1.75
Apolipoprotein(a) LPA 0.74 0.64
Elongation factor 1-alpha 2 EEF1A2 1.13 1.74
Cytochrome c oxidase protein 20 homolog COX20 1.38 1.63
Translin TSN 1.2 1.57
Folate receptor beta FOLR2 0.72 0.65
Secretory carrier-associated membrane protein 3 SCAMP3 1.38 1.53
Chitinase-3-like protein 1 CHI3L1 1.11 1.86
Mitochondrial intermembrane space import and assembly protein 40 CHCHD4 0.9 0.57
Fibrocystin-L PKHD1L1 0.71 0.55
Girdin CCDC88A 0.82 0.38
Flap endonuclease 1 FEN1 1.3 1.74
Solute carrier family 43 member 3 SLC43A3 1.29 1.65
Complement factor H-related protein 3 CFHR3 0.84 0.59
Cleavage stimulation factor subunit 3 CSTF3 1.39 1.88
Protein kinase C delta-binding protein PRKCDBP 0.76 0.54
Transmembrane protein 176B TMEM176B 1.32 1.62
60 kDa lysophospholipase ASPG 0.7 0.62
Spermidine synthase SRM 1.2 1.51
B-cell receptor-associated protein 29 BCAP29 1.11 1.56
Retinol dehydrogenase 10 RDH10 1.36 1.58
PDZ and LIM domain protein 2 PDLIM2 0.8 0.6
Sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit beta-3 ATP1B3 1.46 1.56
Uncharacterized protein C19orf52 C19orf52 1.36 1.53
Transmembrane protein 70, mitochondrial TMEM70 1.24 1.51
Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 2 IGF2BP2 1.41 1.77
C-reactive protein CRP 1.2 1.83
Importin subunit alpha-1 KPNA2 1.33 2.77
COX assembly mitochondrial protein 2 homolog CMC2 0.82 0.61
Retinoic acid receptor responder protein 2 RARRES2 1.38 1.54
Oncoprotein-induced transcript 3 protein OIT3 0.71 0.59
Ficolin-1 FCN1 0.9 0.65
StAR-related lipid transfer protein 5 STARD5 0.76 0.56
Transmembrane protein 14C TMEM14C 1.33 1.64
P2X purinoceptor 4 P2RX4 1.39 1.58
Bifunctional lysine-specific demethylase and histidyl-hydroxylase MINA MINA 1.28 1.63
Myeloid leukemia factor 2 MLF2 0.81 0.58
C4b-binding protein beta chain C4BPB 1.16 1.65
Astrocytic phosphoprotein PEA-15 A15 1.07 1.53
Pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1 protein-interacting protein PTTG1IP 1.36 1.68
Unconventional myin-XIX MYO19 1.4 1.55
Ras-related protein Rab-3D RAB3D 1.49 1.61
F-box only protein 22 FBXO22 1.15 1.61
UPF0364 protein C6orf211 C6orf211 1.33 1.59
PRA1 family protein 2 PRAF2 1.28 1.53
Serine incorporator 1 SERINC1 1.41 1.53
Spermatogenesis-defective protein 39 homolog VIPAS39 1.33 1.53
Ryanodine receptor 1 RYR1 0.91 1.52
AP-1 complex subunit gamma-like 2 AP1G2 1.4 1.65
Hexokinase-2 HK2 1.37 1.97
Uncharacterized protein C2orf42 C2orf42 1.19 1.53
Phospholipid transfer protein PLTP 1.05 2.05
PC4 and SFRS1-interacting protein PSIP1 1.3 1.53
Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 18 ARHGEF18 1.48 1.56
Acylphosphatase-2 ACYP2 0.82 0.6
Claudin-1 CLDN1 1.05 1.68
Neutral amino acid transporter B(0) SLC1A5 1.2 2
CB1 cannabinoid receptor-interacting protein 1 CNRIP1 0.91 0.66
Cytolic Fe–S cluster assembly factor NUBP2 NUBP2 0.84 0.6
Sortilin SORT1 1.12 1.51
UPF0729 protein C18orf32 C18orf32 1.15 1.77
Protein YIPF4 YIPF4 1.33 1.6
Cell growth regulator with EF hand domain protein 1 CGREF1 1.11 1.54
Presenilins-associated rhomboid-like protein, mitochondrial PARL 1.3 1.59
Bactericidal permeability-increasing protein BPI 1.23 1.66
Protein S100-A1 S100A1 1.27 1.63
Ammonium transporter Rh type A RHAG 2.34 1.83
Pleckstrin homology domain-containing family G member 3 PLEKHG3 1.37 1.52
Putative methyltransferase NSUN5 NSUN5 0.71 0.59
Secretory carrier-associated membrane protein 4 SCAMP4 1.32 1.61
Cochlin COCH 1.31 2.12
tRNA (guanine(10)-N2)-methyltransferase homolog TRMT11 1.33 2
Protein YIPF3 YIPF3 1.27 1.54
Synaptogyrin-1 SYNGR1 1.34 1.73
Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L1 UCHL1 1.26 1.57
MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 2 MAPKAPK2 1.41 1.52
Proteoglycan 3 PRG3 0.69 0.65
Bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer BAK1 1.3 1.7
TNF receptor-associated factor 6 TRAF6 1.03 0.66
Ethanolamine-phosphate phospho-lyase ETNPPL 0.66 0.46
Proto-oncogene tyrine-protein kinase Src SRC 1.29 1.62
Folate transporter 1 SLC19A1 1.3 1.81
Platelet factor 4 PF4 0.76 0.54
Chloride intracellular channel protein 5 CLIC5 1 1.52
Negative elongation factor E NELFE 1.32 1.64
RNA polymerase II-associated protein 1 RPAP1 1.26 1.65
Zinc transporter SLC39A7 SLC39A7 1.67 2
Ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 24 ANKRD24 0.8 1.65
Centromal protein of 85 kDa-like CEP85L 0.26 0.65
Caspase-3 CASP3 1.22 1.68
Peroxisomal leader peptide-processing protease TYSND1 1.3 1.6
tRNA (guanine(37)-N1)-methyltransferase TRMT5 1.26 1.86
Mitochondrial inner membrane organizing system protein 1 MINOS1 1.31 1.52
Coiled-coil domain-containing protein 153 CCDC153 1.36 2.47
Conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 8 COG8 1.23 1.56
Vesicle transport protein SFT2B SFT2D2 1.13 1.51
F-box only protein 10 FBXO10 0.71 0.63
Muskelin MKLN1 1.09 1.57
Tuftelin-interacting protein 11 TFIP11 1.27 1.52
Sulfotransferase 1C2 SULT1C2 1.15 1.62
Zinc transporter ZIP1 SLC39A1 1.45 1.91
Proton-coupled folate transporter SLC46A1 1.19 1.52
Putative heat shock protein HSP 90-beta 2 HSP90AB2P 1.29 2.25
Asparagine synthetase [glutamine-hydrolyzing] ASNS 1.21 2.7
Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 38 USP38 0.64 0.52
Glycogen synthase kinase-3 alpha GSK3A 1.34 1.71
Coiled-coil domain-containing protein 69 CCDC69 0.8 0.66
Retinoid-binding protein 7 RBP7 0.95 1.51
Signal-transducing adaptor protein 2 STAP2 1.21 1.59
Soluble calcium-activated nucleotidase 1 CANT1 1.5 2
Threonine synthase-like 2 THNSL2 0.65 0.48

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Gene ontology (GO) function analysis of differentially expressed proteins which is only dysregulated in HCC with a single lesion or HCC with multiple lesions. (A) GO analysis of the molecular function of the proteins which is only differentially expressed in HCC with multiple lesions. (B) GO analysis of the molecular function of the proteins which is only differentially expressed in HCC with a single lesion. (C) GO analysis of the cell component of the proteins which is only differentially expressed in HCC with multiple lesions. (D) GO analysis of the cell component of the proteins which is only differentially expressed in HCC with a single lesion. All of biological processes were ranked in term of the enrichment of the differentially expressed proteins, and the top 10 are presented.

The biological functions and signaling pathway annotations of the differentially expressed proteins were analyzed by Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA) software (version 7.5), which is based on the Ingenuity Pathways database. The key functions of the differentially expressed proteins involved in the HCC with single and multiple lesions according to IPA analysis are also displayed in Fig. 5. The GO annotations, involved signaling pathways and networks were ranked in term of the enrichment of the differentially expressed proteins.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

The key functions of the differentially expressed proteins involved in the HCC with single and multiple lesions according to IPA analysis. (A) Enriched Functions of the differentially expressed proteins that is only dysregulated in HCC with multiple lesions. (B) Enriched Functions of the differentially expressed proteins that is only dysregulated in HCC with a single lesion. All of pathways were ranked in term of the enrichment of the differentially expressed proteins, and the top 10 were presented.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the key clinical specialty discipline construction program of Fujian, P.R. China; the key project of National Science and Technology of China (Grant nos. 2012ZX10002010-001-006 and 2012ZX10002016-013); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 31201008 and 31400634); the specialized Science and Technology Key Project of Fujian Province (Grant no. 2013YZ0002-3); the Science and Technology Infrastructure Construction Program of Fujian Province (Grant no. 2014Y2005); the Scientific Foundation of Fuzhou Health Department (Grant nos. 2014-S-w24, 2013-S-w12, 2013-S-125-4, and 2013-S-wp1); the Young Teacher Education Project of Fujian Province (Grant no. 2013 JB13125).

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2015.08.036.

Appendix B

Conflict of interest associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2015.08.036.

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.zip (1.3MB, zip)

Appendix B. Conflict of interest

Conflict of interest

mmc2.zip (13.5MB, zip)

References

  • 1.Xiaohua Xing, Yao Huang, Sen Wang, Minhui Chi, Yongyi Zeng, Lihong Chen, Jinhua Zeng, Minjie Lin, Xiaolong Liu, Jingfeng Liu. Comparative analysis of the primary multiple and single hepatocellular carcinoma by iTRAQ based quantitative proteomics. J. Proteomics 128 (2015) 262–271. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.08.007〉 (in press). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Gilar M., Olivova P., Daly A.E., Gebler J.C. Two-dimensional separation of peptides using RP–RP–HPLC system with different pH in first and second separation dimensions. J. Sep. Sci. 2005;28:1694–1703. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200500116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.zip (1.3MB, zip)

Conflict of interest

mmc2.zip (13.5MB, zip)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES