Skip to main content
Hospital Pharmacy logoLink to Hospital Pharmacy
. 2015 Apr 8;50(4):310–325. doi: 10.1310/hpj5004-310

Netupitant/Palonosetron

Dennis J Cada *, James Leonard , Danial E Baker
PMCID: PMC4589884  PMID: 26448661

Abstract

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committees. Subscribers also receive monthly 1-page summary monographs on agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation/medication use evaluation (DUE/MUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are sent in print and are also available on-line. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of a facility. A drug class review is now published monthly with The Formulary Monograph Service. Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about The Formulary Monograph Service, call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The April 2015 monograph topics are edoxaban, diclofenac sodium injectable, olaparib, antihemophilic factor porcine, and blinatumomab. The Safety MUE is on edoxaban.


Generic Name: Netupitant/Palonosetron

Proprietary Name: Akynzeo (Eisai Inc)

Approval Rating: 1S

Therapeutic Class: 5-HT 3 receptor antagonists; Antiemetic agents; NK1 receptor antagonists

Similar Drugs: Aprepitant, Dolasetron, Fosaprepitant, Granisetron, Ondansetron, Palonosetron

Sound- or Look- Alike Names: Aprepitant, Dolasetron, Fosaprepitant, Granisetron, Ondansetron, Palonosetron

Indications

Netupitant/palonosetron, in a fixed-dose combination, is approved for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat doses of chemotherapy, including, but not limited to, highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) regimens.1,2 See Table 1 for a comparison of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved indications for 5-HT3 antagonists and neurokinin 1 (NK1) inhibitors.1,314

Table 1. FDA-approved indications for 5-HT3antagonists and NK1 inhibitors1,314.

Prevention of acute and delayed CINV with HEC Prevention of acute CINV with HEC Prevention of acute and delayed CINV with MEC therapy Prevention of CINV with MEC therapy Prevention of PONV Prevention of N/V after irradiation
Netupitant/Palonosetron Oral capsule X

Aprepitant Oral tablet X X X

Fosaprepitant Injectable solution X X

Dolasetron Injectable solution X
Oral tablet X

Granisetron Injectable solution X X
Oral tablet X X X
Oral solution X X X
Transdermal patch X X

Ondansetron Injectable solution X X X
Oral tablet X X X X
ODT X X X X
Oral solution X X X X
ODF X X X X

Palonosetron Injectable solution X X X X

Note: CINV = chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting; MEC = moderately emetogenic chemotherapy; N/V = nausea and vomiting; ODF = orally disintegrating film; ODT = orally disintegrating tablet; PONV = postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Clinical Pharmacology

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a commonly occurring adverse event following use of chemotherapeutic regimens for treatment of cancers.15 Multiple patient risk factors (eg, age, gender, alcohol consumption) have been identified along with the emetogenic potential of individual or combination chemotherapeutic agents.15,16 The exact mechanism is unclear, but acute-phase nausea is potentially due to the release of serotonin (5-HT) by enterochromaffin cells in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.1,15 The delayed phase is thought to be due to substance P activation of NK1 receptors.1 Activation of NK1 receptors, both centrally and peripherally, by substance P is involved in multiple physiologic pathways, including pain and migraine regulation, nausea and vomiting, mood and anxiety levels, alcoholism, and inflammatory conditions of the GI tract.17,18

In vitro models show that netupitant inhibits the action of substance P at the human NK1 receptor in a concentration-dependent manner, and a human positron emission tomography study showed that netupitant is able to cross the blood-brain barrier.17,18 Netupitant is present in the frontal and occipital cortex, the striatum, the anterior cingulate, and the lateral and medial temporal cortex.18 Palonosetron is a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist that inhibits the serotonin secreted from stimulation by chemotherapy.1 An in vitro model showed that the combination of netupitant and palonosetron inhibited activation of NK1 receptors by substance P in a synergistic manner; neither chemical alone inhibited activation at the synergistic concentrations studied.19 Netupitant and palonosetron had no action at NK2 or NK3 receptors.19

Pharmacokinetics

Combinations of netupitant 200 to 600 mg and palonosetron 0.5 to 1.5 mg have total exposure (area under the curve [AUC]) and mean maximum concentration (Cmax) best characterized by a linear pharmacokinetic model.20 Between-subject variability is between 42% and 56% for netupitant 200 to 600 mg and between 20% and 29% for palonosetron 0.5 to 1.5 mg.20 At the doses studied, netupitant and palonosetron have no effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of each other.1,21

Following oral administration of netupitant and palonosetron in healthy subjects, the time to maximum concentration (Tmax) is about 5 hours for both drugs.1 Additionally, coadministration with food, presence of cancer, or subsequent administration of chemotherapy have no effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of netupitant and palonosetron.1

Netupitant monotherapy has linear pharmacokinetics in regard to Cmax and AUC in single doses ranging from 100 to 450 mg.18 After oral administration of netupitant, Tmax is about 5 hours.1,18 Netupitant and its metabolites (M1, M2, and M3) are highly bound in plasma proteins (99.5% netupitant, 97.5% metabolites).1 Netupitant undergoes significant metabolism to a multitude of metabolites via both phase 1 and phase 2 processes. The primary metabolites M1, M2, and M3 account for 29%, 14%, and 33%, respectively, of the circulating exposure to netupitant; these metabolites are active in animal models.1,18 The approximate half-life after a single dose of netupitant in cancer patients is 80 hours.1 Netupitant 300 mg has a long duration of receptor occupancy at 96 hours, which contributes to its duration of effect.18

Following oral administration of radiolabeled netupitant, half of the radioactivity is recovered in feces and urine 120 hours post dose; 70% and 4% of the drug are recovered in feces and urine, respectively, by 336 hours; and 86.5% and 4.8% of the drug are recovered in feces and urine, respectively, by 30 days post dose. Radioactivity is recovered primarily as metabolites.18

Palonosetron monotherapy (3 to 80 mcg/kg in healthy subjects) demonstrates dose-proportional pharmacokinetics. After oral administration, bioavailability is 97%. Palonosetron is approximately 62% bound to plasma proteins. Primary metabolism is via cytochrome P450 (CYP-450) 2D6 and, to a lesser extent, 3A4 and 1A2. The half-life of palonosetron in patients with cancer is 48 hours.1

The pharmacokinetic parameters for the 5-HT3 antagonists and NK1 inhibitors are compared in Table 2.1,314

Table 2. Pharmacokinetic parameters for 5-HT3 antagonists and NK1 inhibitors1,314.

Agent Dosage form Tmax t1/2 Metabolism Excretion Dose adjustments
Netupitant/Palonosetron Oral capsule 5 h; 5 h 96 h; 44 h CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2D6;
CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP1A2
Feces as metabolites; urine as metabolites No adjustments

Dolasetron (hydrodolasetron) Injectable solution
Oral tablet
36 min
1 h
7.3 h
8.1 h
CYP2D6, CYP3A Urine 53% to 61% unchanged No adjustments

Aprepitant Oral tablet 3 to 4 h 9 to 13 h CYP3A4, CYP1A2, CYP2C19 Urine 57%, feces 45% No adjustments
Fosaprepitant Injectable solution 20 min 9 to 13 h

Granisetron Injectable solution 4.9 to 8.9 h CYP3A Urine 12% unchanged No adjustments

Oral tablet 6.2 h
Oral solution 6.2 h
Transdermal patch 48 h

Ondansetron Injectable solution 10 min (IV); 41 min (IM) 3.5 to 5.5 h CYP1A2, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 Urine 5% unchanged Severe hepatic impairment
Oral tablet 1.7 to 2.2 h 3.1 to 6.2 h
ODT 1.7 to 2.2 h 3.1 to 6.2 h
Oral solution 1.7 to 2.2 h 3.1 to 6.2 h
ODF 1.7 h 4.5 to 5.4 h

Palonosetron Injectable solution 5 min 40 h CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP1A2 Urine as metabolites No adjustments

Note: h = hours; IM = intramuscular; IV = intravenous; min = minutes; ODF = orally disintegrating film; ODT = orally disintegrating table; t1/2 = terminal half-life.

Comparative Efficacy

Indication: Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting

Guidelines

Guideline: European Society of Medical Oncology/ Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (ESMO/MASCC) Guidelines Working Group; guideline update for MASCC and ESMO in the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

Reference: Roila F, et al, 201016

Comments: In patients undergoing HEC, prevention of acute nausea and vomiting should include a 5-HT3 antagonist, dexamethasone, and aprepitant. All patients receiving cisplatin should receive antiemetic therapy to prevent delayed nausea and vomiting; a recommended treatment for both acute and delayed nausea and vomiting is a 5-HT3 antagonist plus dexamethasone plus aprepitant on day 1, followed by aprepitant plus dexamethasone on days 2 to 3 and dexamethasone alone on day 4. The guidelines recommend NK1 antagonists as a class; at the time these guidelines were published, aprepitant was the only approved NK1 antagonist. In patients undergoing treatment with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) containing anthracycline/cyclophosphamide, a 5-HT3 antagonist plus dexamethasone plus aprepitant is recommended on day 1 followed by aprepitant on days 2 to 3. For MEC not containing anthracycline/cyclophosphamide, palonosetron plus dexamethasone on day 1 followed by dexamethasone on days 2 to 3 is recommended. No difference has been reported between oral and parenteral dosage forms. These guidelines were published prior to approval of the netupitant/palonosetron combination.

Studies

Drug: Netupitant/Palonosetron plus Dexamethasone vs Palonosetron plus Dexamethasone

Reference: Aapro M, et al, 201422

Study Design: Randomized, double-blind, doubledummy, active-controlled, multicenter study

Study Funding: Helsinn Healthcare, SA

Patients: 1,450 patients 18 years and older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2 who were naive to chemotherapy for a solid tumor and scheduled to receive their first course of an anthracycline/ cyclophosphamide-containing MEC regimen. Key exclusion criteria included planned HEC on days 1 to 5 or additional MEC on days 2 to 5, radiation therapy, or bone marrow or stem-cell transplant. Patients could not use medications with known emetogenic efficacy within 24 hours prior to day 1 and were excluded if they experienced vomiting, retching, or mild nausea within 24 hours prior to day 1. Additional exclusion criteria included a history of cardiovascular disease, conduction abnormalities (except incomplete right bundle branch block), use of CYP3A4 inducers within 4 weeks, use of strong or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors within 1 week, and concomitant use of inducers or substrates. Median age was 54 years, 98% were women, and approximately 80% were White; approximately 97.5% had breast cancer, approximately 99% had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, and 63.7% to 68% received doxorubicin.

Intervention: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive netupitant 300 mg/palonosetron 0.5 mg plus dexamethasone 12 mg or palonosetron 0.5 mg plus dexamethasone 20 mg on day 1 prior to chemotherapy. Netupitant/palonosetron or palonosetron was administered 60 minutes prior to chemotherapy, and dexamethasone was administered 30 minutes prior to chemotherapy. Chemotherapeutic regimens contained cyclophosphamide 500 to 1,500 mg/m2 and either doxorubicin (at least 40 mg/m2) or epirubicin (at least 60 mg/m2). Investigators were provided metoclopramide tablets as rescue treatment, but could use alternative rescue treatment at their own discretion (excluding 5-HT3 antagonists, NK1 antagonists). Use of rescue medication was considered treatment failure.

Results

Primary Endpoint(s)

  • Proportion of patients with a complete response (no emesis, no rescue medication) during the delayed phase (25 to 120 hours) was 76.9% with netupitant/palonosetron and 69.5% with palonosetron (P = .001). Number needed to treat (NNT) with netupitant/palonosetron compared with palonosetron alone was 13.5.

Secondary Endpoint(s)

  • Proportion of patients with a complete response during the acute phase (0 to 24 hours) was 88.4% with netupitant/palonosetron and 85% with palonosetron (P = .047; NNT = 29.4).

  • Proportion of patients with a complete response overall (0 to 120 hours) was 74.3% with netupitant/palonosetron and 66.6% with palonosetron (P = .001; NNT = 13).

  • Proportion of patients with complete protection (complete response without significant nausea) with netupitant/palonosetron and palonosetron during the acute phase (82.3% vs 81.1%; P = .528), delayed phase (67.3% vs 60.3%; P = .005; NNT = 14.3), and overall period (63.8% vs 57.9%; P = .02; NNT = 17).

  • Proportion of patients with no significant nausea (visual analog score less than 25 mm) with netupitant/palonosetron and palonosetron during the acute phase (87.3% vs 87.9%; P = 0.747), delayed phase (76.9% vs 71.3%; P = .014; NNT = 17.9), and overall period (74.6% vs 69.1%; P = .02; NNT = 18.2).

  • Proportion of patients with no emesis with netupitant/palonosetron and palonosetron during the acute phase (90.9% vs 87.3%; P = .025; NNT = 27.8), delayed phase (81.8% vs 75.6%; P = .004; NNT = 16.1), and overall period (79.8% vs 72.1%; P < .001; NNT = 13).

Endpoint(s)

  • Proportion of patients for whom nausea and vomiting had no impact on daily life based on Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire score was 78.5% with netupitant/ palonosetron and 72.1% with palonosetron (P = .005; NNT = 15.6).

  • The most commonly reported adverse events were headache and constipation and were reported at similar rates between groups.

Comments: This was a phase 3 pivotal trial. The trial showed an improvement in nausea and vomiting over palonosetron in women undergoing their first treatment for breast cancer with a combination of cyclophosphamide and either doxorubicin or epirubicin. This study does not show an effect on anticipatory nausea. Stratification was based on region and age (younger than 55 years [51.2%] or 55 years and older [48.8%]). Patients were eligible to enter an extension trial for repeat consecutive cycles of chemotherapy. A safety trial reported by Gralla and colleagues randomized 413 patients (1,961 chemotherapy cycles; 76% MEC and 24% HEC) 3:1 to receive either palonosetron plus netupitant or palonosetron plus aprepitant.23 A total of 75% of patients completed at least 4 cycles. Over multiple cycles, 10.1% of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events in the netupitant arm, and 5.8% experienced treatment-related adverse events in the aprepitant arm (number needed to harm [NNH] of 23); the most commonly reported adverse event of multiple cycles was constipation (3.6% with netupitant; 1% with aprepitant). Efficacy (complete response rates) was sustained over 6 cycles of chemotherapy and was similar between the 2 treatment arms. The safety study excluded patients with breast cancer receiving anthracycline/ cyclophosphamide-containing MEC.

Limitations: The study did not include a significant proportion of male subjects because the majority of patients had been diagnosed with breast cancer.

Drug: Netupitant/Palonosetron plus Dexamethasone vs Palonosetron plus Dexamethasone vs Aprepitant plus Ondansetron plus Dexamethasone

Reference: Hesketh PJ, et al, 201424

Study Design: Randomized, double-blind, doubledummy, active-controlled, multicenter study

Study Funding: Helsinn Healthcare, SA

Patients: 694 patients 18 years and older with a Karnofsky performance score of at least 70% and who were naive to chemotherapy and scheduled to receive their first course of cisplatin (50 mg/m2 or greater) alone or in combination for the treatment of a malignant tumor. Key exclusion criteria included planned HEC or MEC on days 2 to 5, moderately or highly emetogenic radiotherapy, or bone marrow or stem-cell transplant. Patients were not allowed to use medications with known emetogenic efficacy within 24 hours prior to day 1 or systemic corticosteroids within 72 hours of day 1. Patients were also excluded if they experienced vomiting, retching, or mild nausea within 24 hours prior to day 1. Additional exclusion criteria included a history of or predisposition to cardiovascular disease and conduction abnormalities (except incomplete right bundle branch block). Use of CYP3A4 inducers within 4 weeks, use of strong or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors within 1 week, and concomitant use of inducers or substrates were prohibited. Median age was 55 years and approximately 57% were men; approximately 57% did not use alcohol, approximately 50% had lung, head, and neck cancers; approximately 60% had a Karnofsky performance score of 90%; approximately 50% received cisplatin plus a low emetogenic therapy; and approximately 35% received cisplatin plus MEC or HEC.

Intervention: Patients were evenly randomized to 1 of 5 of the following treatment arms: placebo plus palonosetron 0.5 mg plus oral dexamethasone 20 mg on day 1, followed by oral dexamethasone 8 mg twice daily on days 2 to 4 (palonosetron 0.5 mg alone); oral netupitant 100, 200, or 300 mg plus palonosetron 0.5 mg plus dexamethasone 12 mg on day 1, followed by dexamethasone 4 mg twice daily on days 2 to 4; or oral aprepitant 125 mg plus IV ondansetron 32 mg plus oral dexamethasone 12 mg on day 1 followed by oral aprepitant 80 mg daily and dexamethasone 4 mg twice daily for days 2 to 3, and then followed by oral dexamethasone 4 mg twice daily on day 4 (aprepitant plus ondansetron). Investigators could use rescue treatment with the exclusion of 5-HT3 antagonists or NK1 antagonists. Use of rescue medication was considered treatment failure.

Results

Primary Endpoint(s)

  • Proportion of patients with a complete response during the overall period (0 to 120 hours) was 87.4% (P ≤ .05) with netupitant 100 mg plus palonosetron, 87.6% (P ≤ .05) with netupitant 200 mg plus palonosetron, 89.6% (P ≤ .01) with netupitant 300 mg plus palonosetron, 86.6% (P ≤ .05) with aprepitant plus ondansetron, and 76.5% with palonosetron 0.5 mg alone. NNT with netupitant 300 mg plus palonosetron versus palonosetron 0.5 mg alone was 7.6.

Secondary Endpoint(s)

  • Proportion of patients with a complete response during the delayed phase (25 to 120 hours) was 90.4% (P ≤ .05) with netupitant 100 mg plus palonosetron, 91.2% (P ≤ .05) with netupitant 200 mg plus palonosetron, 90.4% (P ≤ .05) with netupitant 300 mg plus palonosetron, 88.8% (P ≤ .05) with aprepitant plus ondansetron, and 80.1% with palonosetron 0.5 mg alone. NNT for netupitant 300 mg plus palonosetron versus palonosetron 0.5 mg alone was 9.7.

  • Proportion of patients with a complete response during the acute phase (0 to 24 hours) was 93.3% with netupitant 100 mg plus palonosetron, 92.7% with netupitant 200 mg plus palonosetron, 98.5% (P ≤ .05) with netupitant 300 mg plus palonosetron, 94.8% with aprepitant plus ondansetron, and 89.7% with palonosetron 0.5 mg alone. NNT with netupitant 300 mg plus palonosetron versus palonosetron 0.5 mg alone was 11.4.

  • Additional results are presented in Table 3.

Table 3. Proportion of patients achieving no emesis or no significant nausea over study period24.
Palonosetron 0.5 mg alone Netupitant 100 mg plus palonosetron Netupitant 200 mg plus palonosetron Netupitant 300 mg plus palonosetron Aprepitant plus ondansetron
No emesis (0 to 24 h) 89.7% 93.3% 92.7% 98.5% (P < .01; NNT = 11.4) 94.8%

No emesis (25 to 120 h) 80.1% 90.4% 91.2% 91.9% (P < .01; NNT = 8.5) 89.6% (P = .05)

No emesis (0 to 120 h) 76.5% 87.4% (P = .05) 87.6% (P = .05) 91.1% (P = .01; NNT = 6.8) 87.3% (P = .05)

No significant nausea (0 to 24 h) 93.4% 94.1% 94.2% 98.5% (P = .05; NNT = 19.6) 94%

No significant nausea (25 to 120 h) 80.9% 81.5% 89.8% (P = .05) 90.4% (P = .01; NNT = 10.5) 88.1%

No significant nausea (0 to 120 h) 79.4% 80% 86.1% 89.6% (P = .05; NNT = 9.8) 85.8%

Complete protection (0 to 24 h) 87.5% 89.6% 88.3% 97% (P = .05; NNT = 10.5) 89.6%

Complete protection (25 to 120 h) 73.5% 80% 87.6% (P = .01) 84.4% (P = .05; NNT = 9.2) 82.1%

Complete protection (0 to 120 h) 69.9% 76.3% 80.3% (P = .05) 83% (P = .01; NNT = 7.6) 78.4%

Note: P values are comparison with palonosetron 0.5 mg without an NK1 antagonist group. h = hours; NNT = number needed to treat compared with palonosetron alone.

Endpoint(s)

  • The most common adverse events in all palonosetron arms were hiccups, headache, and leukocytosis.

Comments: This was a phase 2 pivotal, dose-ranging trial. Stratification was based on gender, and subgroup analysis suggested that netupitant plus palonosetron elicited more of a benefit in women than in men. The study was not powered to show a difference between aprepitant and netupitant arms, and all analyses of aprepitant compared with the palonosetron-only arm were post hoc.

Limitations: The trial was not conducted at US sites.

Contraindications, Warnings, and Precautions

The contraindications, warnings, precautions, and use in special populations for the 5-HT3 antagonists and NK1 inhibitors are summarized in Tables 4 and 5.1,314

Table 4. Contraindications, warnings, and precautions for 5-HT3 antagonists and NK1 inhibitors1,314.

Netupitant/Palonosetron Dolasetron Palonosetron Ondansetron Granisetron Aprepitant Fosaprepitant

OC IS OT IS IS OT ODT OS ODF IS OT OS TDS OT IS
Contraindications

Hypersensitivity X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

CINV X

Concomitant use with apomorphine X X X X X

Administration with pimozide, terfenadine, astemizole, or cisapride X X

Warnings and precautions

Hypersensitivity X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Serotonin syndrome X X X X X X X X X X X X X

QTc prolongation X X X X X X X X X X X

PR/QRS prolongation X X

Not a substitute for gastric suction X X X X X X X X X

Masked ileus X X X X X

Skin reactions X
Sunlight exposure X

Administration with CYP3A4 X X

Administration with warfarin X X

Administration with hormonal contraceptives X X

Severe hepatic failure X

Chronic use X X

Note: CINV = chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting; IS = injectable solution; OC = oral capsule; ODF = orally disintegrating film; ODT = orally disintegrating tablet; OS = oral solution; OT = fioral tablet, PONV = postoperative nausea and vomiting; TDS = transdermal delivery system.

Table 5. Use of 5-HT3 antagonists and NK1 inhibitors in special populations1,314.

Netupitant/Palonosetron Dolasetron Palonosetron Ondansetron Granisetron Aprepitant Fosaprepitant
Pregnancy Category C Category B Category B Category B Category B Category B Category B

Breast-feeding Discontinue Discontinue Discontinue Use caution Use caution Discontinue Discontinue

Pediatric Not approved 2 years and older 1 month and older for CINV IS: 1 month and older for PONV; 6 months and older for CINV
OT, ODT, OS, ODF: 4 years and older for CINV
IS: 2 years and older CINV
OT, OS, TDS: Not approved
Not approved Not approved

Elderly No adjustment recommended No adjustment recommended No adjustment recommended No adjustment recommended No adjustment recommended No adjustment recommended No adjustment recommended

Hepatic impairment No adjustment for mild to moderate impairment; avoid in severe impairment No adjustment recommended No adjustment recommended Severe impairment; maximum of 8 mg/day No adjustment recommended No adjustment for mild to moderate impairment; use caution in severe impairment No adjustment for mild to moderate impairment; use caution in severe impairment

Renal impairment No adjustment for mild to moderate impairment; avoid in severe impairment No adjustment recommended No adjustment recommended No adjustment recommended No adjustment recommended No adjustment recommended No adjustment recommended

Note: CINV = chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting; IS = injectable solution; OC = oral capsule; ODF = orally disintegrating film; ODT = orally disintegrating tablet; OS = oral solution; OT = oral tablet, PONV = postoperative nausea and vomiting; TDS = transdermal delivery system.

Contraindications

No contraindications are listed in the prescribing information.1 Hypersensitivity to active ingredient or any inactive ingredients (eg, microcrystalline cellulose, sucrose fatty acid esters, povidone K-30, croscarmellose sodium, silicon dioxide, sodium stearyl fumarate, magnesium stearate, monoglycerides and diglycerides of capryl/capric acid, glycerin, polyglyceryl oleate, butylated hydroxyanisole, gelatin, sorbitol, titanium dioxide, yellow iron oxide, and red iron oxide; trace amounts of medium-chain triglycerides, lecithin, and denatured ethanol) should be considered a contraindication to therapy.1

Warnings and Precautions

Hypersensitivity reactions have been reported in patients treated with 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. These reactions were reported in patients with and without known hypersensitivity to other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists.1

Serotonin syndrome, sometimes fatal, has been reported with use of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. Most cases have been observed when 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are used in conjunction with other serotonergic drugs (eg, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs], serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs], monoamine oxidase inhibitors [MAOIs], mirtazapine, fentanyl, lithium, tramadol, IV methylene blue) or in cases of overdose with other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. Most cases of serotonin syndrome have occurred in patients in postanesthesia care units or infusion centers.1 Patients should be educated to recognize and report signs and symptoms of serotonin syndrome, including mental status changes (eg, agitation, hallucinations, delirium, coma), autonomic instability (eg, tachycardia, labile blood pressure, dizziness, diaphoresis, flushing, hyperthermia), neuromuscular symptoms (eg, tremor, rigidity, myoclonus, hyperreflexia, incoordination), seizures, and potential GI symptoms (eg, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea). If serotonin syndrome occurs, immediately discontinue netupitant/palonosetron.1

A placebo-controlled QTc study showed that doses ranging from netupitant 200 mg/palonosetron 0.5 mg to netupitant 600 mg/palonosetron 1.5 mg did not clinically increase the QTc interval compared with placebo.1,20

Netupitant is classified as Pregnancy Category C; no adequate and well-controlled studies have been performed in pregnant women. Netupitant/palonosetron should only be used in pregnancy if the benefits clearly outweigh the risks. Administration of doses up to 3.7 times the human exposure to pregnant rats did not lead to fetal abnormalities. Administration of doses at least 0.2 times the human exposure did lead to fetal abnormalities in pregnant rabbits.1

It is not known if netupitant/palonosetron is excreted in human breast milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human breast milk, caution should be used and a decision to discontinue netupitant/ palonosetron or breast-feeding should be made.1

Safety and efficacy have not been established in patients younger than 18 years.1

No dosage adjustment is required for patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score of 5 to 8). Limited data are available concerning the use of netupitant/palonosetron in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score of 9 or greater); netupitant/palonosetron should be avoided in these patients.1

No dosage adjustment is required for patients with mild to moderate renal impairment. Although severe renal impairment did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of netupitant/palonosetron, safety and efficacy have not been established in this population. Netupitant/palonosetron should be avoided in patients with severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis.1

Adverse Reactions

The most commonly reported adverse reactions in patients receiving netupitant/palonosetron compared with those receiving palonosetron prior to HEC were dyspepsia (4% vs 2%), fatigue (4% vs 2%), constipation (3% vs 1%), and erythema (3% vs 2%). For patients receiving netupitant/palonosetron or palonosetron prior to MEC (eg, anthracyclines, cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy), the most common adverse events were headache (9% vs 7%), asthenia (8% vs 7%), and fatigue (7% vs 5%).1

Abnormal laboratory values in patients treated with netupitant/palonosetron or palonosetron were aspartate aminotransferase (AST) greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) greater than 3 times the ULN with total bilirubin greater than ULN (0.3% vs 0.6%); AST greater than 10 times the ULN and/or ALT greater than 10 times the ULN with total bilirubin greater than the ULN (0% vs 0.2%); and AST greater than 3 times the ULN and/or ALT greater than 3 times the ULN with total bilirubin 2 times the ULN or greater (0.1% vs 0.1%).1

In a trial for the treatment of overactive bladder, healthy patients undergoing daily dosing of netupitant 200 mg for up to 8 weeks had a higher rate of somnolence (10% vs 5%), headache (3.3% vs 0%), first-degree atrioventricular block (3.3% vs 1.7%), tachycardia (3.3% vs 0%), and nausea (3.3% vs 0%) compared with the placebo group.25

Drug Interactions

Coadministration of netupitant and midazolam (a CYP3A4 substrate) increased midazolam’s Cmax by 40%, AUCinf by 144%, and mean half-life by 64%. The clearance of midazolam was decreased 52%. The pharmacokinetics of netupitant were not affected by the presence of midazolam.1,26 Caution should be used when administering netupitant/palonosetron with benzodiazepines metabolized via CYP3A4 (eg, alprazolam, midazolam, triazolam).1

Coadministration of netupitant and erythromycin increased erythromycin’s Cmax by 30%, AUCinf by 30%, and mean half-life by 17%. The clearance of erythromycin was decreased by 44%. The pharmacokinetics of netupitant were not affected by the presence of erythromycin.26

Coadministration of netupitant 300 mg and dexamethasone (20 mg on day 1 followed by 8 mg twice daily on days 2 to 4) increased dexamethasone’s AUC0-24 by 72% on day 1, AUC24-36 by 143% on day 2, AUC84-108 by 140%, and AUC84-inf by 140% compared with dexamethasone alone. The Cmax of dexamethasone was increased by 11% on day 1, by 66% on day 2, and by 75% on day 4. The half-life of dexamethasone was increased by 1.9 to 3.2 hours on day 1 and by 2 to 2.4 hours on day 4. The pharmacokinetics of netupitant were not affected by the presence of dexamethasone.1,26 A dosage reduction is recommended for dexamethasone.1

Coadministration of netupitant/palonosetron with chemotherapeutic agents metabolized by CYP3A4 (eg, docetaxel, paclitaxel, etoposide, irinotecan, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, imatinib, vinorelbine, vinblastine, vincristine) may increase the systemic exposure of these chemotherapeutic agents. Caution should be used, and patients should be monitored closely for adverse reactions due to chemotherapy.1 One study reported that coadministration of netupitant/palonosetron and cyclophosphamide did not lead to increased rates of adverse events (neutropenia, alopecia, and leukopenia) over at least 4 cycles of chemotherapy.27

Coadministration of oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol with netupitant/palonosetron is unlikely to affect the efficacy of the oral contraceptive.1,21

Coadministration of strong inducers of CYP3A4 (eg, rifampin) may reduce the efficacy of netupitant/ palonosetron by reducing the plasma concentrations of netupitant. Avoid coadministration of strong inducers of CYP3A4 and netupitant/palonosetron.1,21

Coadministration of strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 (eg, ketoconazole) may increase the systemic exposure of netupitant. No dosage adjustment is recommended.1,21

Coadministration of serotonergic drugs and netupitant/palonosetron may put patients at risk of serotonin syndrome. Monitor for and educate patients about the signs and symptoms of serotonin syndrome during treatment with netupitant/palonosetron.1

Coadministration of digoxin and netupitant 450 mg did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of digoxin. Administration of netupitant and P-glycoprotein may not require dosage adjustments.28

Recommended Monitoring

All patients should be monitored for adverse events due to excessive levels of chemotherapeutic agents metabolized by CYP3A4. Additionally, when multiple serotonergic agents are used, patients should be monitored for signs and symptoms of serotonin syndrome.1

Patients should be both warned of increased sedation due to benzodiazepines metabolized by CYP3A4 and monitored for these effects. The increased effect of benzodiazepines can last for multiple days.1

Dosing

The recommended dose for patients undergoing HEC is 1 capsule of netupitant 300 mg/palonosetron 0.5 mg orally 1 hour prior to chemotherapy, followed by dexamethasone 12 mg 30 minutes prior to chemotherapy on day 1. Additionally, patients should be administered dexamethasone 8 mg orally once daily on days 2 through 4.1

For patients undergoing MEC (eg, anthracyclines, cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy, chemotherapy not considered to be highly emetogenic), the recommended dose is 1 capsule of netupitant 300 mg/palonosetron 0.5 mg orally 1 hour prior to chemotherapy, followed by dexamethasone 12 mg orally 30 minutes prior to chemotherapy on day 1. Administration of dexamethasone on days 2 to 4 is not necessary. 1

Netupitant/palonosetron can be taken without regard to food.1

Dosing for 5-HT3 antagonists and NK1 inhibitors for CINV and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are summarized in Table 6 and Table 7, respectively.1,3,5,6,1214

Table 6. Dosing for 5-HT3 antagonists and NK1 inhibitors in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting1,3,5,6,12,13,14.

Infusion time Day 1 Days 2 to 3 Day 4
Netupitant/Palonosetron Oral capsule (HEC) N/Aa One capsule 1 h prior to chemotherapy + dexamethasone 12 mg PO 30 min prior to chemotherapy Dexamethasone 8 mg PO once daily Dexamethasone 8 mg PO once daily
Oral capsule (MEC) N/A One capsule 1 h prior to chemotherapy + dexamethasone 12 mg PO 30 min prior to chemotherapy

Dolasetron Oral tablet N/A Adults: 100 mg 1 h prior to chemotherapy
Pediatric patients 2 to 16 years old: 1.8 mg/kg (maximum, 100 mg) 1 h prior to chemotherapy (may use injection solution as oral dose)
Injectable solution N/A Contraindicated

Palonosetron Injectable solution Adults: 30 sec Adults: 0.25 mg 30 min prior to chemotherapy
Pediatrics: 15 min Pediatrics 1 month to younger than 17 years: 20 mcg/kg (maximum, 1.5 mg) 30 min prior to chemotherapy

Ondansetron Injectable solution 15 min Adults and pediatric patients 6 months to 18 years old: Three 0.15 mg/kg doses (maximum, 16 mg/dose) 30 min prior to chemotherapy, 4 h after the first dose, and 8 h after the first dose
Oral tablet, ODT, Oral solution, ODF (HEC) N/A Adults: 24 mg 30 min prior to chemotherapy Not studied
Oral tablet, ODT, Oral solution, ODF (MEC) N/A Adults and pediatric patients 12 years and older: 8 mg 30 min prior to chemotherapy, followed by 8 mg 8 h after the first dose Adults: 8 mg twice daily
Pediatric patients 4 to 11 years old: 4 mg 30 min prior to chemotherapy, followed by 4 mg 4 and 8 h after the initial dose Pediatric patients 4 to 11 years old: 4 mg 3 times daily

Granisetron Injectable solution 30 sec or 5 min Adults and pediatric patients 2 to 16 years old: 10 mcg/kg 30 min prior to chemotherapy
Oral tablet
Oral solution
N/A
N/A
Adults: 2 mg 1 h prior to chemotherapy OR 1 mg 1 h prior to chemotherapy followed by 1 mg 12 h after the first dose No benefit No benefit
Transdermal patch N/A Adults: One patch at least 24 h and up to 48 h prior to chemotherapy; patch can be left on for up to 7 days

Aprepitant Oral tablet (HEC) N/A 125 mg + dexamethasone 12 mg + 5-HT3 antagonist 1 h prior to chemotherapy 80 mg + dexamethasone 8 mg Dexamethasone 8 mg
Oral tablet (MEC) N/A 125 mg + dexamethasone 12 mg + 5-HT3 antagonist 1 h prior to chemotherapy 80 mg None

Fosaprepitant Injectable solution (HEC, 1-day dosing) 20 to 30 min 150 mg + dexamethasone 12 mg + 5-HT3 antagonist 30 min prior to chemotherapy Dexamethasone 8 mg on day 2; dexamethasone 8 mg twice daily on day 3 Dexamethasone 8 mg twice daily
Injectable 15 min 115 mg + dexamethasone 12 mg + 5-HT3 antagonist 30 min prior to chemotherapy 80 mg PO + dexamethasone 8 mg Dexamethasone 8 mg
Injectable solution (MEC) 15 minutes 115 mg + dexamethasone 12 mg + 5-HT3 antagonist 30 min prior to chemotherapy 80 mg PO

Note: h = hours; HEC = highly emetogenic chemotherapy; MEC = moderately emetogenic chemotherapy; min = minutes; N/A = not applicable; ODF = orally dis-integrating film; ODT = orally disintegrating tablet; PO = orally; sec = seconds.

Table 7. Dosing for 5-HT3 antagonists and NK1 inhibitors in postoperative nausea and vomiting1,3,5,6,1214.

Infusion time Adults Pediatric patients
Netupitant/Palonosetron Oral capsule N/A Not approved

Dolasetron Injectable solution 30 sec or 15 min 12.5 mg IV 15 min before cessation of anesthesia OR 12.5 mg IV as soon as nausea or vomiting is present 2 to 16 years old: 0.35 mg/kg (maximum, 12.5 mg) IV 15 minutes before cessation of anesthesia OR as soon as nausea or vomiting is present

Palonosetron Injectable solution 10 sec 0.075 mg IV immediately prior to induction of anesthesia Not approved

Ondansetron Injectable solution Preferably 2 to 5 min; 30 sec is an option 4 mg IV immediately prior to induction of anesthesia or postoperatively 1 month to 12 years old:
  • Weight < 40 kg: 0.1 mg/kg IV

  • Weight 40 kg or greater: 4 mg IV immediately prior to induction of anesthesia or postoperatively


Oral tablet, ODT, Oral solution, ODF N/A 16 mg orally 1 h prior to induction of anesthesia Not approved

Aprepitant Oral tablet N/A 40 mg within 3 h prior to induction of anesthesia Not approved

Note: h = hours; IV = intravenous; min = minutes; NA = not applicable; ODF = orally disintegrating film; sec = seconds.

Product Availability

Netupitant/palonosetron was approved by the FDA on October 10, 2014.2 It is available as a pack of 1 hard gelatin, white and caramel-colored capsule containing 3 netupitant 100 mg tablets and 1 palonosetron 0.5 mg gelatin capsule.1

Netupitant/palonosetron should be stored between 68°F and 77°F (20°C and 25°C), with excursions permitted between 59°F and 86°F (15°C and 30°C).1

The availability of 5-HT3 antagonists and NK1 inhibitors is summarized in Table 8.1,314,29

Table 8. Availability for 5-HT3 antagonists and NK1 inhibitors1,314,29.

Generic name Dosage form Proprietary name Strengths Pack size Generic availability
Netupitant/Palonosetron Oral capsule Akynzeo 300 mg/0.5 mg 1 capsule No

Dolasetron Injectable solution Anzemet 20 mg/mL 0.625 mL (6 vials), 5 mL (1 single-dose vial), 25 mL (1 multidose vial) Yes
50 mg 5-count bottle, 10-count unit-dose pack Yes
Oral tablet Anzemet 100 mg 5-count bottle, 5-count blister pack, 10-count unit-dose pack

Palonosetron Injectable solution Aloxi 0.05 mg/mL 1.5 mL (5 vials), 5 mL (1 vial) No

Ondansetron Injectable solution Zofran 2 mg/mL 2 mL (24 prefilled syringes, 25 single-dose vials), 20 mL (multidose vial) Yes
Oral tablet Zofran 4 mg, 8 mg Pack of 3 tablets, bottle of 30 tablets Yes
ODT Zofran 4 mg, 8 mg Pack of 30 tablets Yes
Oral solution Zofran 4 mg/5 mL 50 mL bottle Yes
ODF Zuplenz 4 mg Box of 10 No
8 mg Box of 10 No

Granisetron Injectable solution Kytril 1 mg/mL 1 mL (single-dose vial, pack of 1), 4 mL (multidose vial, pack of 1) Yes
Kytril 0.1 mg/mL 1 mL (single-dose vial, pack of 10) Yes
Oral tablet Kytril 1 mg Pack of 2 tablets, pack of 20 tablets Yes
Oral solution Granisol 2 mg/10 mL 30 mL bottle No (discontinued)
Transdermal patch Sancuso 3.1 mg per 24 hours Single patch No

Aprepitant Oral tablet Emend 40 mg Pack of 1 tablet, pack of 5 tablets No
80 mg Pack of 2 tablets, pack of 6 tablets No
125 mg Pack of 6 tablets, tripack with one 125 mg tablet and two 80 mg tablets No

Fosaprepitant Injectable solution Emend 115 mg
150 mg
1 single-dose vial
1 single-dose vial
No

Note: ODF = orally disintegrating film; ODT = orally disintegrating tablet.

Drug Safety/Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS)

No REMS is required for netupitant/palonosetron.2

Conclusion

Netupitant/palonosetron is the first approved combination product containing a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and an NK1 receptor antagonist. ESMO/ MASCC guidelines recommend combination therapy for HEC regimens. The efficacy studies used a single dose with an extension or a 6-cycle dose. One study included aprepitant with ondansetron, but the study was not designed to compare netupitant/palonosetron with this arm and did not perform statistical analysis between the groups. While palonosetron was previously approved and has been used clinically in a large population, experience with netupitant is limited. Netupitant monotherapy was studied for a different indication at a dose of 200 mg daily for 8 weeks and showed an adverse effect profile similar to those of short-term studies. Netupitant/palonosetron has not been studied for the treatment of nausea.

References

  • 1.Akynzeo (netupitant and palonosetron capsules) [prescribing information]. Woodcliff Lake, NJ: Eisai Inc; October 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beitz JG. NDA approval letter: Akynzeo (netupitant and palonosetron NDA 205718). US Food and Drug Administration Web site. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfdafidocs/appletter/2014/205718Orig1s000ltr.pdf Published October 10, 2014. Accessed October14, 2014.
  • 3.Aloxi (palonosetron) [prescribing information]. Woodcliff Lake, NJ: Eisai Inc; September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Anzemet (dolasetron tablets) [prescribing information]. Bridgewater, NJ: Sanofi-Aventis US; September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Anzemet (dolasetron injection) [prescribing information]. Bridgewater, NJ: Sanofi-Aventis US; September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Emend (aprepitant capsules) [prescribing information]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck & Co; August 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Emend (fosaprepitant injection) [prescribing information]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck & Co; August 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Granisetron injection [prescribing information]. Lake Zurich, IL: Fresenius Kabi; August 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Granisetron tablets [prescribing information]. Sellersville, PA: Teva Pharmaceuticals; August 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Granisol (granisetron oral solution) [prescribing information]. Califon, NJ: PediatRx; November 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sancuso (granisetron transdermal) [prescribing information]. Bridgewater, NJ: ProStrakan Inc; September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zofran (ondansetron injection) [prescribing information]. Research Triangle Park, NC: GlaxoSmithKline; September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zofran (ondansetron oral tablets, orally disintegrating tablets, oral solution) [prescribing information]. Research Triangle Park, NC: GlaxoSmithKline; September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zuplenz (ondansetron oral film) [prescribing information]. Portland, OR: Galena Biopharma; September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hesketh PJ. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(23):2482–2494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Roila F, Herrstedt J, Aapro M, et al. ; ESMO/MASCC Guidelines Working Group. Guideline update for MASCC and ESMO in the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: Results of the Perugia consensus conference. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(suppl 5): v232-v243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rizzi A, Campi B, Camarda V, et al. In vitro and in vivo pharmacological characterization of the novel NK1 receptor selective antagonist netupitant. Peptides. 2012;37(1):86–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Spinelli T, Calcagnile S, Giuliano C, et al. Netupitant PET imaging and ADME studies in humans. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;54(1):97–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stathis M, Pietra C, Rojas C, Slusher BS. Inhibition of substance P-mediated responses in NG108-15 cells by netupitant and palonosetron exhibit synergistic effects. Eur J Pharmacol. 2012; 689 (1-3): 25–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Spinelli T, Moresino C, Baumann S, Timmer W, Schultz A. Effects of combined netupitant and palonosetron (NEPA), a cancer supportive care antiemetic, on the ECG of healthy subjects: An ICH E14 thorough QT trial. Springerplus. 2014;3:389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Calcagnile S, Lanzarotti C, Rossi G, Henriksson A, Kammerer KP, Timmer W. Effect of netupitant, a highly selective NK1 receptor antagonist, on the pharmacokinetics of palonosetron and impact of the fixed dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron when coadministered with ketoconazole, rifampicin, and oral contraceptives. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(10):2879–2987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aapro M, Rugo H, Rossi G, et al. A randomized phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of NEPA, a fixed-dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron, for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(7):1328–1333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gralla RJ, Bosnjak SM, Hontsa A, et al. A phase III study evaluating the safety and efficacy of NEPA, a fixed-dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron, for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting over repeated cycles of chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(7):1333–1339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hesketh PJ, Rossi G, Rizzi G, et al. Efficacy and safety of NEPA, an oral combination of netupitant and palonosetron, for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly emetogenic chemotherapy: A randomized dose-ranging pivotal study. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(7):1340–1346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Haab F, Braticevici B, Krivoborodov G, Palmas M, Zufferli Russo M, Pietra C. Efficacy and safety of repeated dosing of netupitant, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, in treating overactive bladder. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33(3):335–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lanzarotti C, Rossi G. Effect of netupitant, a highly selective NK1 receptor antagonist, on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, erythromycin, and dexamethasone. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(10):2783–2791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schwartzberg L, Oprean C, Cardona-Huerta S, et al. No evidence of increase cyclophosphamide toxicity associated with the antiemetic agent NEPA, a fixed-dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron [abstract]. Blood. 2013;122(21):2949. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Baumann S, Tilola SO, Spinelli T, Timmer W. An evaluation of the drug interaction potential of netupitant with digoxin [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(suppl): abstracte19530. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.US National Library of Medicine. Ondansetron hydrochloride injection, solution. BD Rx Inc. NDC 76045-103-20. DailyMed Web site. http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=d89017aa-b8c3-4fd2-8e68-44e2cfd6f290 Updated April 2013. Accessed November4, 2014.

Articles from Hospital Pharmacy are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES