Abstract
Patterns of late Palaeogene mammalian evolution appear to be very different between Eurasia and North America. Around the Eocene–Oligocene (EO) transition global temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere plummet: following this, European mammal faunas undergo a profound extinction event (the Grande Coupure), while in North America they appear to pass through this temperature event unscathed. Here, we investigate the role of surface uplift to environmental change and mammalian evolution through the Palaeogene (66–23 Ma). Palaeogene regional surface uplift in North America caused large-scale reorganization of precipitation patterns, particularly in the continental interior, in accord with our combined stable isotope and ecometric data. Changes in mammalian faunas reflect that these were dry and high-elevation palaeoenvironments. The scenario of Middle to Late Eocene (50–37 Ma) surface uplift, together with decreasing precipitation in higher-altitude regions of western North America, explains the enigma of the apparent lack of the large-scale mammal faunal change around the EO transition that characterized western Europe. We suggest that North American mammalian faunas were already pre-adapted to cooler and drier conditions preceding the EO boundary, resulting from the effects of a protracted history of surface uplift.
Keywords: Palaeogene, mammals, North America, tectonics, precipitation estimates, terrestrial environments
1. Introduction
Multiple studies have investigated the Palaeogene (66–23 Ma) evolution of mammalian faunas (e.g. [1–10]). Usually, these continental- or global-scale investigations employ evidence from long-term marine climate records (e.g. [11,12]) to explain patterns and trends in terrestrial faunal data, or to identify periods of rapid and profound terrestrial climate change. However, terrestrial studies that cover greater spatial scales and that integrate both faunal response and geologic data are not common. For example, the Eocene–Oligocene (EO) boundary at 33.9 Ma represents one of the most dramatic intervals of Cenozoic climatic change (e.g. [11]). However, there are relatively few terrestrial EO records from the mid-to-high latitudes, and terrestrial palaeoclimate data indicate spatially distinct climate responses (e.g. [13] and references therein).
Here, we use fossil data for large herbivorous mammals to spatially analyse the EO (56–23 Ma) development of habitats and palaeoenvironments in western North America. We complement the fossil record with a compilation of pedogenic and lacustrine oxygen isotope (δ18O) data for the Eocene and Oligocene of western North America [14,15] that track the long-term precipitation patterns of western North America. We then combine δ18O-based reconstructions of regional precipitation patterns with ecometric information from herbivorous mammals using a proxy method to estimate past precipitation [16]. Although we show the precipitation estimates in mm, we treat these in relative sense in this paper, for comparison between or within maps. We compare our results to published mammalian and terrestrial palaeoclimate data from Europe to investigate the effects of surface uplift on western North American palaeoclimate and how the resulting mammalian diversity pattern differs from that of European counterparts.
We postulate that Eocene regional surface uplift in western North America, starting at latest between 46 and 37 Ma, enhanced rather cool and (sub-)arid conditions in the continental interior, thus pre-adapting the herbivorous mammalian fauna to the climatic regimes of the later Oligocene. (Note that by ‘pre-adapting’ the fauna, we are not implying uniform change in all lineages; rather community changes by a combination of changes within lineages, extinction and the radiation of new taxa, as later discussed.) We provide data that palaeoenvironmental changes to which mammalian communities adapted in the Late Eocene–Early Oligocene were more protracted in North America and took place earlier than in Europe. This explains the apparent lack of response of mammalian faunas at the EO transition in North America: the changes that took place at that point in time in Europe had already happened in North America.
(a). Environmental and faunal context
Global temperatures were typically high during the Early Eocene (56–50 Ma; e.g. [12]), with moderate equator–pole temperature gradients. Tropical evergreen floral systems dominated the Northern Hemisphere (e.g. [5,17–19]). Precipitation levels were also high. Quantitative precipitation estimates are typically scarce, and in North America concentrate on foreland basins in Montana, Wyoming and Colorado. In Wyoming, the mean annual precipitation (MAP) estimates exceeded 1200 mm yr–1 [18] (based on [20]), and climate modelling suggests that there were already east–west precipitation gradients developing [21]. This time interval, 56–50 Ma, also marks the highest temperatures of the Cenozoic, culminating in the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum (EECO; approx. 53–50 Ma). At the start of the Middle Eocene, the global mean temperature started to decrease (e.g. [12]). In North America, estimated MAP (based on leaf assemblage data) plummeted to around 750 mm yr–1 [17,20–22] in Wyoming soon after 50 Ma, with the widespread ‘Bridgerian Crash’ in the mammalian faunas [18] from 50 to 47 Ma.
Since the detailed faunal history of North American Palaeogene has been summarized elsewhere (e.g. [7]), we only provide a brief overview of the main trends, and discuss these in relation to our results later.
The onset of the Eocene (56 Ma) marked the first appearance of many modern mammalian orders, such as the perissodactyl (odd-toed) and artiodactyl (even-toed) ungulates, and the true primates (euprimates). The ungulates are of particular interest in the determination of palaeoenvironmental conditions, and the Early Eocene forms were mainly small and generalized omnivores or herbivores. During the Early Eocene artiodactyls and perissodactyls diversified rapidly, and forms with dentitions specialized for folivory (i.e. leaf eating; primates as well as ungulates) appeared. The declining temperatures through the Palaeogene resulted in the extinction of smaller, generalized omnivorous forms among all ungulate groups. During the Middle Eocene (approx. 47–37 Ma), the generic diversity of modern types of ungulate genera increased to an Eocene maximum, while most of the archaic forms (i.e. ‘condylarths’) became extinct. The dental morphology of the Late Eocene ungulates shows a general shift from omnivory to folivory. The first artiodactyls with high-crowned teeth (teeth specialized to withstand an abrasive diet) appeared during the Oligocene. By the Late Oligocene, the mammalian diversity had declined to Early Eocene levels, but many of the taxa were now much larger (e.g. [3,17,18]). Changes were also apparent in mammalian dentition, indicative of changes in diet (and hence in environmental condition): by the Late Eocene (approx. 37–33 Ma) most ungulates had teeth where the originally blunt cusps of the bunodont omnivores now extended into cutting ridges (i.e. lophs), indicative of greater specialization for folivory. In perissodactyls, this was achieved through lophodont molars, and in ruminant and camelid artiodactyls with selenodont molar forms (see [3,23] and electronic supplementary material for more details).
2. Material and methods
The North American large herbivore mammal data derive from published fossil mammal compilations [23,24]. ‘Large’ mammals are those that exceed around 1–3 kg in body mass (the median body size of extant mammals; e.g. [25]): here we base this decision on taxonomic affinity, including the ungulate (or ungulate-like) orders Artiodactyla, Condylarthra†, Dinocerata†, Pantodonta†, Perissodactyla, Taeniodonta† and Tillodontia†, but excluding Rodentia and Lagomorpha. For each taxon, we scored the molar crown height (hypsodonty [26,27]) and the number of longitudinal cutting edges in antero-posterior direction (lophs) on molar crowns [2,16]. Hypsodonty categories are based on the ratio of height-to-length of the second molar (upper or lower). Brachydont teeth (i.e. category 1) have a ratio of less than 0.8, mesodont teeth (category 2) range from 0.8 to 1.2, and hypsodont teeth (category 3) are more than 1.2. Loph count scores vary from 0 to 3. We refer the reader to the electronic supplementary material for more details.
We used only those localities for which we could score at least two values for each metric. The entire dataset contains 357 localities and 4820 taxon occurrences. The entire Tertiary Mammals of North America dataset [23,24] will be made publicly available through the NOW database (http://www.helsinki.fi/science/now) in 2015.
(a). Precipitation estimates
To estimate past precipitation levels, we used a method based on present-day data from large herbivorous mammal communities and their relationship to MAP [16]. This method uses longitudinal loph count and hypsodonty to estimate MAP using the empirically determined relationship
![]() |
where HYP is the mean hypsodonty of the mammal assemblage, LOP is the mean longitudinal loph count of the mammal assemblage and MAP is in millimetre per annum. The s.e. is ±412 mm, which is similar to other palaeoprecipitation proxy methods [27,28]. Despite the large uncertainties in estimating MAP, this study relies on relative differences in MAP through time, thus rendering our approach sensitive to changes in regional rainfall patterns over time. Our estimates fall in line with previous results (e.g. [17,18,20,21]), but we do not want to draw attention to exact values due to large standard errors and other sources of uncertainty. In the following text, we discuss the results in relative terms (humid, less humid, arid, etc.) because we are mapping out the development of environments from one end-member (tropical humid) to the other (temperate seasonal).
(b). Spatial analysis
We subdivided our data into time intervals following the North American Land Mammal (NALMA) ages (based on [29]) covering the time interval from 56 to 23 Ma. We plotted the mammal assemblage data using MapInfo v. 11.5. In figure 1, we show three distinct phases of the western North American uplift following the SWEEP (Southward Encroachment of an Eocene North American Plateau) model [14,15], and the modern US state names to help the orientation. The SWEEP model posits that surface uplift in western North America was largely diachronous, starting prior to 50 Ma in British Columbia and Montana, and progressing south over time. This north-to-south development of similar-to-modern topography coincided with magmatic and tectonic processes that affected large regions of the North American continental lithosphere [15]. In addition, to quantify regional estimates, we pooled the data and divided the dataset to eastern and western regions (with 115°W longitude as a rough separation line between the present-day Rocky Mountains and the Great Basin to the west, which has undergone major Neogene extension).
Figure 1.
The modern US state names in western North America. Overlaid on this map are the three phases of regional surface uplift from Mix et al. [14]. I, phase I; II, phase II; III, phase III.
3. Results
During the first 10 Myr of the Cenozoic (Palaeocene, approx. 66–56 Ma) the mammalian communities depict generally uniform environments over the entire area of western North America. We therefore focus on the time interval 56–23 Ma, when major reorganization of topography would have affected western North American habitats, as well as atmospheric circulation and precipitation patterns (figure 2; see also [15,21,30]).
Figure 2.
Mean estimated precipitation in millimetres per year for individual Palaeocene–Oligocene time intervals. The black stars are fossil localities. The precipitation estimates are based on Liu et al.'s method [16] and have standard error of 412 mm yr–1. The three phases of regional surface uplift are shown in grey raster. (a) Phase I, (b,c) phase II, (d–h) phase III. (a) Wasatchian (55–50 Ma), (b) Bridgerian (50–46.3 Ma), (c) Uintan (46.3–40 Ma), (d) Duschesnean (40–37 Ma), (e) Chadronian (37–33.7 Ma), (f) Orellan (33.7–32 Ma), (g) Whitneyan (32–30 Ma), (h) Early Arikareean (30–23 Ma). The black dashed line in (a) shows the 115° W separation line.
Our data indicate that during the Wasatchian (approx. 56–50 Ma) extensive regions of western North America were still fairly humid (blue and green colour code in figure 2); the first indication of less humid environments occurs in the southwest (figure 2a; see also table 1). During this time, high elevation (more than 3000 m, most probably accompanied by significant topographic relief) already characterized central British Columbia [14,15,31,32], the Colorado Plateau region [33,34] and the Sierra Nevada (e.g. [35]), while the orogenic front was active in Idaho–Utah–Arizona (e.g. [36,37]).
Table 1.
Mean precipitation values for eastern and western areas (border 115° W), s.e. is ±412 mm.
NALMA | mean MAP (mm yr−1) for Eastern Part | mean MAP (mm yr−1) for Western Part |
---|---|---|
Puercan 65–63.9 Ma | 2311 | 2316 |
Torrejonian 63.9–60.9 Ma | 2183 | n.a. |
Tiffanian 60.9–56 Ma | 1981 | 1170 |
Clarforkian 56–55 Ma | 2034 | 1598 |
Wasatchian 55–50 Ma | 1895 | 1672 |
Bridgerian 50–46.3 Ma | 1754 | 1456 |
Uintan 46.3–40 Ma | 1645 | n.a. |
Duchesnean 40–37 Ma | 1481 | 1599 |
Chadronian 37–33.7 Ma | 1178 | 1391 |
Orellan 33.7–32 Ma | 1115 | 899 |
Whitneyan 32–30 Ma | 1023 | n.a. |
Early Arikareean 30–23 Ma | 661 | n.a. |
During the Bridgerian (approx. 50–46 Ma), the SWEEP model suggests high-elevation/high-relief areas spreading southwards from British Columbia towards Idaho–Montana–Wyoming [14,15] (figure 2b). The few mammal localities located to the west of the tectonic active region now show less humid environments, while the localities in the tectonically active region (Idaho–Utah–Arizona) show higher precipitation estimates. During the Uintan (middle Middle Eocene, approx. 46–40 Ma; figure 2c), this pattern remained essentially identical, with the tectonically active region becoming less humid, and a few more humid localities along the Pacific coast.
During the Duchesnean (late Middle Eocene, approx. 40–37 Ma; figure 2d), regions characterized by precipitation patterns similar to the present day (humid western part, more arid eastern part east of the Rocky Mountains) reached more southern latitudes, perhaps as far as southern Nevada (based on stable isotope data [14,38]). The Duchesnean fossil mammal data depict uniformly less humid environments than earlier in the Eocene (change from blue to green in precipitation maps), an environmental regime that greatly intensifies during the Chadronian (Late Eocene, approx. 37–34 Ma), in particular in the Wyoming–Utah–Montana area (figure 2e). The only areas suggestive of more humid environments in the Chadronian were in New Mexico, although the southernmost localities (Texas–Mexico) were more arid. Unfortunately, there is a lack of Chadronian Pacific coast mammal fossil localities.
During the Orellan (early Early Oligocene, approx. 34–32 Ma; figure 2f), mammal localities in and to the east of the tectonically active region continued to show relatively less humid conditions. The sole west coast locality indicates more humid conditions, and another isolated locality in the Mississippi region is also consistent with more humid conditions (green colour), perhaps outlining the effects of orographic rainfall on either side of the high-elevation region with precipitation delivered by the Pacific westerlies (in the west) or sourced in the Gulf of Mexico (in the east). Whitneyan (late Early Oligocene, approx. 32–30 Ma; figure 2g) conditions remained similar to the Orellan. By contrast, the Early Arikareean (early Late Oligocene, approx. 30–23 Ma; figure 2h) mammalian faunas show continuous decrease in humidity overall.
On a continental scale, mean MAP estimates decrease throughout the entire Palaeogene (figure 3a). If the data are split into eastern and western segments (at longitude 115° W; figure 3b,c), the results become even more evident. While the eastern part, reflecting the continental interior, is similar to our continental compilation (figure 3b), the western part (figure 3c) is markedly different, suggesting the latter was more humid than the continental interior (despite the limited sampling density).
Figure 3.
(a) Continental summary curves for MAP estimates (solid line) and mean hypsodonty (hatched line) values. x-axis: land mammal ages (age in million years. Grey solid vertical bar marks the EO boundary. (b,c) Summary curves for MAP estimates (solid line) and Mean hypsodonty (hatched line) values for (b) eastern and (c) western parts of the investigated area. We used 115° W as a separation line between eastern and western regions. (Online version in colour.)
4. Discussion
Considerable controversy exists about the climatic and environmental changes at or prior to the EO transition (e.g. [13,39–45]), especially as to the effect of global cooling at the EO transition on mammalian evolution and community structure (see e.g. [39,40] and references therein). Recent studies show that climatic changes accompanying the EO transition were of different magnitude in different parts of the world (see e.g. [46], Spain; [41], South America; [13,42], UK; [43,47], UK and USA). In this context, the topographic history of North America, and its influence on Northern Hemisphere environmental change, have received little attention. Stable isotope palaeoaltimetry and palaeobotanical data indicate that the western North American highlands (separating the continental interiors from the coastal regions) were extensive (e.g. [48]) and occupied regions as far south as northern Nevada around 40–37 Ma (e.g. [14,15,32]) during the late Midde Eocene (Duchesnean NALMA), causing increased aridity in the western continental interior from 37 Ma onwards (figure 2e–h). Increased rainfall along the western and eastern flanks (steep orographic rainfall gradients), with rather high δ18O values, contrasts with a relatively dry continental interior (west of 115°) characterized by low δ18O values (figure 4a,b). The changes in both δ18O values of precipitation and North American mammalian community structure occur prior to the EO transition (34–33 Ma), in concert with the development of high surface elevation in western North America.
Figure 4.
(a) Oxygen isotopic compositions of palaeoprecipitation (δ18Op) from 39 to 28 Ma (n = 264; based on Mix et al. [14]). δ18Op values are derived from stable isotope analysis of hydrated volcanic glass (diamonds), authigenic smectite clays (squares) and lacustrine or pedogenic carbonate (circles). The black horizontal line shows an east–west transect at 40° N. (b) δ18Op along the 40° N east–west transect shown in (a), highlighting (oxygen isotopic) rainfall gradients on either side of high topography. (Online version in colour.)
(a). Changes in mammalian communities in relation to mountain uplift
Our results show that regional changes in topography and regional relief exerted a major climatic impact in western North America by causing shifts in precipitation patterns, resulting in a drier interior of the continent. In accordance with our data, climate model results [21,30] delineate a humid, tropical to subtropical climate along the southern coastal plain (Texas) and in the southerly foreland basins to the east of the modern Rocky Mountains during the Early and Middle Eocene.
Our data indicate that the Duchesnean (late Middle Eocene) was uniformly less humid than previous time intervals, with considerably drier environments in the Chadronian (Late Eocene). During the Late Eocene (figure 2d–e), there is an almost complete loss of primates and archaic forms of ungulates, and a dramatic decrease in the number of taxa with bunodont cheek teeth (reflecting a generally omnivorous diet) in the herbivore fauna, from 30% in the Middle Eocene to around 10% in the Late Eocene [3]. This decrease represented the loss not only of archaic ‘condylarth’ ungulates, but also of the more primitive ‘dichobunid’ artiodactyls. The late Middle to Late Eocene (Uintan–Chadronian; figure 2c–e) marked the appearance of many new taxa, such as rhinocerotid perissodactyls, and families of suiform (tayassuids) and selenodont artiodactyls (oreodonts, anthracotheres, protoceratids, camelids and ruminants; e.g. [3]). Others have previously noted shifts in mammalian communities in the Middle to Late Eocene (e.g. [39,40,49,50]; figure 2c–e), but they have been unable to explain why these changes were much more evident in North America than in Europe.
(b). Contrast to Europe
In contrast to North America, European temperature and precipitation estimates remained high throughout the Eocene (e.g. [19,51]; see also [52]). Proxy data indicated a trend towards drier climates with marked seasonality during the Late Eocene, but continental cooling and drying was not as extreme as in North America [19,53,54], probably because Europe was an archipelago in the tropical Tethys Sea. During the Eocene, central Asia also started to become drier due to continentalization [55]. Just after the EO boundary, the Grande Coupure event took place, characterized by widespread extinction and dispersal-generated origination of taxa [6]. This event marked a sudden change from the archaic endemic European faunas to a new faunal assemblage with major components of Asian origin. Pre-Grande Coupure faunas were dominated by archaic ungulates and rodents, whereas post-Grande Coupure faunas included the ancestors of modern ungulates, such as true rhinos (rhinocerotids) and more modern types of artiodactyls (including anthracotheres, ruminants and suids). The origin and potential cause of the Grande Coupure are still largely elusive; hypotheses include climate cooling at the EO transition, dispersal from outside the main European landmasses, or a combination of climate change (cooling) and competition following dispersal into Europe (e.g. [6,56]). An understanding of the cause of the events in Europe is confounded by the minimal faunal turnover in the Early Oligocene (Orellan and Whitneyan NALMAs) in North America mammalian communities at the time of the earliest Oligocene global climatic deterioration, although it was preceded by a long-term decline in diversity over the course of the Late Eocene (e.g. [39,40,50]). The North American record also shows a pattern of episodic input of immigrant taxa from the Middle Eocene in [24].
(c). Mountain uplift explains the lack of change at the Eocene–Oligocene transition in North America
Our data show that the western North American continental interior became drier during the late Middle Eocene when compared with the earlier part of the Eocene. We propose that this Middle Eocene drying could explain why the major faunal response to the subsequent Palaeogene climatic changes in North America occurred well before the EO transition, and contrasts with contemporaneous faunal response in Eurasia where tectonics and associated surface uplift played only a subordinate role. Increasing seasonal drying affected the vegetation in the North American continental interior already in the Late Eocene. Evidence of drying is reflected in vegetational changes: tropical vegetation was replaced by more temperate habitats, such as mixed coniferous and deciduous woodlands [53,54,57], which would have favoured herbivores more specialized to feed on fibrous plant material (such as the ruminant and camelid artiodactyls, which formed a large component of the later Eocene diversification). The disappearance of most bunodont taxa (omnivores or frugivores), and of obligate arboreal mammals such as primates, is also consistent with this interpretation of environmental shift. Among the ungulates, extinctions occurred in lineages that retained bunodont or semi-lophed teeth, indicative of a more omnivorous/frugivorous diet: the archaic ‘condylarths’ disappeared, as did much of the early radiation of perissodactyls (tapiroids and hyracotheriine equids), and the generalized ‘dichobunid’ artiodactyls were replaced by early members of the modern suborders (either dedicated omnivores such as peccaries, or more specialized folivores such as early oreodonts, camelids and ruminants; see [3] for more details). Among the horses, the small bunolophodont hyracotheres were replaced by the larger anchitheres with fully lophed teeth [58]. These changes are remarkably similar to the changes that took place at Europe 10 Myr or so later, during the Grande Coupure.
5. Conclusion
Topographic reorganization of large parts of western North America during the Eocene, between 50 and 37 Ma, impacted mammalian dispersal and community structure. Regional tectonically driven surface uplift resulted in large-scale reorganization of precipitation patterns, and our data show that the mammalian faunas adapted to these changes. These changes involved the radiation of ungulates with dentitions specialized for folivory, matched by the terminal decline of primates—the so-called switch from the ‘primate-dominated world’ to the ‘ungulate-dominated world’ [59].
We suggest that the Late Eocene mammalian faunas of North America were already ‘pre-adapted’ to the colder and drier global conditions that followed the EO climatic cooling. This was due to two effects: drier environments caused by changes in atmospheric circulation patterns resulting from regional topographic uplift, and the associated establishment of cool high-elevation environments. The scenario of Middle to Late Eocene uplift between 50 and 37 Ma, causing decrease in precipitation, explains the apparent enigma of the lack of large-scale mammal faunal change around the EO transition in North America. Drying had already affected the North American continent for around 10 Myr prior to global EO climate change. Even though there were large shifts in terms of precipitation, temperature and seasonality at this time (see [43] and discussion in [47]), the mammals were already pre-adapted to these conditions. The faunal response to the transformations in vegetation (e.g. greater seasonality, with palatable food items such as buds and berries being unavailable for much of the year) had already taken place well before the EO transition. This observation explains the difference in patterns in mammalian evolution and extinction between North America and Europe at the EO transition. In Europe, the environmental conditions remained largely stable throughout the Eocene, partly due to the geographical boundary conditions (an archipelago surrounded by warm sea). Further climate change at the EO transition was combined with the impact of immigrants from Asia, which were already adapted to drier environmental conditions. This immigration event seems to have tipped the scales, resulting in the wave of extinctions among European taxa seen at this time (i.e. the Grande Coupure).
Our results highlight the importance of regional tectonic and surface uplift processes on the evolution of mammalian faunas (e.g. [60]; for Miocene, see [61,62]). In the light of recent data [55] (our results here), the dramatic effects of the Grande Coupure in Europe may reflect the response of mammals living in warmer and more humid habitats and environments that were still prevalent in Europe during that time. The mammals adapted to these earlier conditions went extinct rapidly when a tipping point was reached in terms of both climatic change and immigration.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank Jan Schnitzler for commenting on the earlier version of the manuscript.
Authors' contributions
J.T.E., C.M.J. and A.M. designed the research; J.T.E. carried out the data analysis; all authors contributed data; all authors wrote the manuscript, with J.T.E. leading. All authors gave final approval for publication.
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests.
Funding
This study was supported by an A. v. Humboldt fellowship (to J.T.E.) and an A. v. Humboldt Research Award (to C.P.C.), EU Marie Curie Fellowship (to J.T.E. and A.M.), and NSF grant EAR-1019648 (to C.P.C. and A.M.). A.M. acknowledges support through the LOEWE funding program (Landes-Offensive zur Entwicklung wissenschaftlich-ökonomischer Exzellenz) of Hesse's Ministry of Higher Education, Research, and the Arts, and an A. Cox Visiting Professorship, Stanford University. C.M.J. acknowledges the Bushnell Foundation (Brown University).
References
- 1.Maas MC, Krause DW. 1994. Mammalian turnover and community structure in the Paleocene of North America. Hist. Biol. 8, 91–128. ( 10.1080/10292389409380473) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jernvall J, Hunter JP, Fortelius M. 2000. Trends in the evolution of molar crown types in ungulate mammals: evidence from the Northern Hemisphere. In Development, function and evolution of teeth (eds Teaford M, Smith MM, Ferguson M.), pp. 269–281. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Janis CM. 2000. Patterns in the evolution of herbivory in large terrestrial mammals: the Paleogene of North America. In Origin and evolution of herbivory in terrestrial vertebrates (eds Sues HD, Labandeira C.), pp. 168–221. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Blondel C. 2001. The Eocene–Oligocene ungulates from Western Europe and their environment. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 168, 125–139. ( 10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00252-2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Collinson ME, Hooker JJ. 2003. Paleogene vegetation of Eurasia: framework for mammalian faunas. DEINSEA 10, 41–84. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hooker JJ, Collinson ME, Sille NP. 2004. Eocene–Oligocene mammalian faunal turnover in the Hampshire Basin, UK: calibration to the global time scale and the major cooling event. J. Geol. Soc. 161, 161–172. ( 10.1144/0016-764903-091) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rose KD. 2006. The beginning of the age of mammals. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gingerich PD. 2006. Environment and evolution through the Paleocene–Eocene thermal maximum. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 246–253. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chew AE. 2009. Paleoecology of the early Eocene Willwood mammal fauna from the central Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. Paleobiology 35, 13–31. ( 10.1666/07072.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rose PJ, Fox DL, Marcot J, Badgley C. 2011. Flat latitudinal gradient in Paleocene mammal richness suggests decoupling of climate and biodiversity. Geology 39, 163–166. ( 10.1130/G31099.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zachos J, Pagani M, Sloan L, Thomas E, Billups K. 2001. Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present. Science 292, 686–693. ( 10.1126/science.1059412) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zachos JC, Dickens GR, Zeebe RE. 2008. An early Cenozoic perspective on greenhouse warming and carbon-cycle dynamics. Nature 451, 279–283. ( 10.1038/nature06588) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hren MT, Sheldon ND, Grimes ST, Collinson ME, Hooker JJ, Bugler M, Lohmann KC. 2013. Terrestrial cooling in Northern Europe during the Eocene–Oligocene transition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7562–7567. ( 10.1073/pnas.12109301100) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mix H, Mulch A, Kent-Corson ML, Chamberlain CP. 2011. Cenozoic migration of topography in the North American Cordillera. Geology 39, 87–90. ( 10.1130/G31450.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chamberlain CP, Mix HT, Mulch A, Hren MT, Kent-Corson ML, Davis SJ, Horton TW, Graham SA. 2012. The Cenozoic climatic and topographic evolution of the Western North American Cordillera. Am. J. Sci. 312, 213–262. ( 10.2475/02.2012.05) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu L, Puolamäki K, Eronen JT, Mirzaie-Ataabadi M, Hernesniemi E, Fortelius M. 2012. Estimating net primary productivity from dental traits. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 2793–2799. ( 10.1098/rspb.2012.0211) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Woodburne MO, Gunnell GF, Stucky RK. 2009. Land mammal faunas of North America rise and fall during the Early Eocene climatic optimum. Denver Mus. Nat. Sci. Ann. 1, 1–74. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Woodburne MO, Gunnell GF, Stucky RK. 2009. Climate directly influences Eocene mammal faunal dynamics in North America. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13 399–13 403. ( 10.1073/pnas.0906802106) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Barron E, Rivas-Carballo R, Postigo-Mijarra JM, Alcalde-Olivares C, Vieira M, Castro L, Pais J, Valle-Hernández M. 2010. The Cenozoic vegetation of the Iberian Peninsula: a synthesis. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 162, 382–402. ( 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.11.007) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wilf P. 2000. Late Paleocene–early Eocene climate changes in southwestern Wyoming: Paleobotanical analysis. GSA Bull. 112, 292–307. () [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sewall JO, Sloan LC. 2006. Come a little bit closer: a high-resolution climate study of the early Paleogene Laramide foreland. Geology 34, 81–84. ( 10.1130/G22177.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wilf P, Wing SL, Greenwood DR, Greenwood CL. 1998. Using fossil leaves as paleoprecipitation indicators: an Eocene example. Geology 26, 203–206. () [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Janis CM, Gunnell GF, Uhen MD. (eds) 2008. Evolution of Tertiary mammals of North America, vol. 2: small mammals, xenarthrans, and marine mammals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Janis CM, Scott KM, Jacobs LL. (eds) 1998. Evolution of Tertiary mammals of North America, vol. 1: terrestrial carnivores, ungulates, and ungulate-like mammals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tomyia S. 2013. Body size and extinction risk in terrestrial mammals above the species level. Am. Nat. 182, E196–E214. ( 10.1086/673489) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fortelius M, et al. 2002. Fossil mammals resolve regional patterns of Eurasian climate change during 20 million years. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4, 1005–1016. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Eronen JT, Puolamäki K, Liu L, Lintulaakso K, Damuth J, Janis C, Fortelius M. 2010. Precipitation and large herbivorous mammals, part I: estimates from present-day communities. Evol. Ecol. Res. 12, 217–233. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Eronen JT, Micheels A, Utescher T. 2012. Comparison of estimates for mean annual precipitation from different proxies: a pilot sttudy for European Neogene. Evol. Ecol. Res. 13, 851–867. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Woodburne MO. (ed). 2004. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic mammals of North America: biostratigraphy and geochronology. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Feng R, Poulsen CJ, Werner M, Chamberlain CP, Mix H, Mulch A. 2013. Evolution of Early Cenozoic topography, climate and stable isotopes in precipitation in the North American Cordillera. Am. J. Sci. 313, 613–648. ( 10.2475/07.2013.01) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mulch A, Teyssier C, Cosca MA, Vanderhaeghe O, Vennemann T. 2004. Reconstructing paleoelevation in eroded orogens. Geology 32, 525–528. ( 10.1130/G20394.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mulch A, Teyssier C, Cosca MA, Chamberlain CP. 2007. Stable isotope paleoaltimetry of Eocene core complexes in the North American Cordillera. Tectonics 26, TC4001 ( 10.1029/2006TC001995) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Huntington KW, Wernicke BP, Eiler JM. 2010. Influence of climate change and uplift on Colorado Plateau paleotemperatures from carbonate ‘clumped isotope’ thermometry. Tectonics 29, 1944–9194. ( 10.1029/2009TC002449) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Flowers RM, Wernicke B, Farley KA. 2008. Unroofing, incision and uplift history of the Southwestern Colorado Plateau from (U-Th)/He apatite thermochronometry. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 120, 571–587. ( 10.1130/B26231.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mulch A, Graham SA, Chamberlain CP. 2006. Hydrogen isotopes in Eocene river gravels and Paleoelevation of the Sierra Nevada. Science 313, 87–89. ( 10.1126/science.1125986) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Davis SJ, Mulch A, Carroll AR, Horton TW, Chamberlain CP. 2009. Paleogene landscape evolution of the central North American cordillera: Developing topography and hydrology in the Laramide foreland. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 121, 100–116. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Galloway WE, Whiteaker TL, Ganey-Curry P. 2011. History of Cenozoic North American drainage basin evolution, sediment yield, and accumulation in the Gulf of Mexico basin. Geosphere 7, 938–973. ( 10.1130/GES00647.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mulch A, Chamberlain CP, Cosca MA, Teyssier C, Methner K, Hren MT, Graham SA. 2015. Rapid change in western North American high-elevation rainfall patterns during the Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum (MECO). Amer. J. Sci. 315, 317–336. ( 10.2475/04.2015.02) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Prothero DR. 1994. The Eocene–Oligocene transition: paradise lost. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Prothero DR. 2012. Cenozoic mammals and climate change: the contrast between coarse-scale versus high-resolution studies explained by species sorting. Geosciences 2, 25–41. ( 10.3390/geosciences2020025) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kohn MJ, Josef JA, Madden R, Kay R, Vucetich G, Carlini AA. 2004. Climate stability across the Eocene–Oligocene transition, southern Argentina. Geology 32, 621–624. ( 10.1130/G20442.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Grimes ST, Hooker JJ, Collinson ME, Mattey DP. 2005. Summer temperatures of Late Eocene to Early Oligocene freshwaters. Geology 33, 189–192. ( 10.1130/G21019.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zanazzi A, Kohn MJ, MacFadden BJ, Terry DO. 2007. Large temperature drop across the Eocene–Oligocene transition in central North America. Nature 445, 639–642. ( 10.1038/nature05551) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Eldrett JS, Greenwood DR, Harding IC, Huber M. 2009. Increased seasonality through the Eocene to Oligocene transition in northern high latitudes. Nature 459, 969–974. ( 10.1038/nature08069) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Liu Z, Pagani M, Zinniker D, Deconto RM, Huber M, Brinkhuis H, Shah SR, Pearson A. 2009. Global cooling during the Eocene–Oligocene climate transition. Science 323, 1187–1190. ( 10.1126/science.1166368) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sheldon ND, Costa E, Cabrera L, Garces M. 2012. Continental climatic and weathering response to the Eocene–Oligocene transition. J. Geol. 120, 227–236. ( 10.1086/663984) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sheldon ND. 2009. Nonmarine records of climatic change across the Eocene–Oligocene transition. In The Late Eocene Earth—Hothouse, Icehouse, and impacts, vol. 452 (eds Koeberl C, Montanari A.), pp. 241–248. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wolfe JA, Forest CE, Molnar P. 1998. Paleobotanical evidence of Eocene and Oligocene paleoaltitudes in midlatitude western North America. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 110, 664–678. () [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lillegraven JA. 1979. A biogeographical problem involving comparisons of later Eocene terrestrial vertebrate faunas of North America. In Historical biogeography, plate tectonics, and the changing environment (eds Gray J, Boucot AJ.), pp. 333–347. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Stucky RK. 1990. Evolution of land mammal diversity in North America during the Cenozoic. In Current mammalogy (ed. Genoways HH.), pp. 375–432. New York, NY: Plenum Press. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Grein M, Utescher T, Wilde V, Roth-Nebelsick A. 2011. Reconstruction of the middle Eocene climate of Messel using palaeobotanical data. N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh. 260/3, 305–318. ( 10.1127/0077-7749/2011/0139) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mosbrugger V, Utescher T, Dilcher DL. 2005. Cenozoic continental climatic evolution of Central Europe. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 14 964–14 969. ( 10.1073/pnas.0505267102) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wolfe JA. 1985. Distribution of major vegetational types during the Tertiary. Geophys. Monogr. 32, 357–375. ( 10.1029/gm032p0357) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wing SL. 1998. Tertiary vegetation of North America as a context for mammalian evolution. In Evolution of tertiary mammals of North America, vol. 1 (eds Janis CM, Scott KM, Jacobs LL.), pp. 37–65. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bosboom RE, Abels HA, Hoorn C, van der Berg BCJ, Guo Z, Dupont-Nivet G. 2014. Aridification in continental Asia after the Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum (MECO). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 389, 34–42. ( 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.12.014) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Costa E, Garces M, Saez A, Cabrera L, Lopez-Blanco M. 2011. The age of the ‘Grande Coupure’ mammal turnover: new constraints from the Eocene–Oligocene record of the Eastern Ebro Basin (NE Spain). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 301, 97–107. ( 10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.01.005) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wolfe JA. 1978. Paleobotanical interpretation of Tertiary climates in Northern Hemisphere. Am. Sci. 66, 694–703. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mihlbachler MC, Rivals F, Solounias N, Semprebon GM. 2011. Dietary change and evolution of horses in North America. Science 331, 1178–1181. ( 10.1126/science.1196166) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Alroy J, Koch PL, Zachos JM. 2000. Global climate change and North American mammalian evolution. Paleobiology 26, 259–288. ( 10.1666/0094-8373(2000)26[259:GCCANA]2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hoorn C, Antonelli A, Mulch A, Mosbrugger V. 2013. Biodiversity from mountain building. Nat. Geosci. 6, 154 ( 10.1038/ngeo1742) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Finarelli JA, Badgley C. 2010. Diversity dynamics of Miocene mammals in relation to the history of tectonism and climate. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 2721–2726. ( 10.1098/rspb.2010.0348) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Badgley C, Finarelli JA. 2013. Diversity dynamics of mammals in relation to tectonic and climatic history: comparison of three Neogene records from North America. Paleobiology 39, 373–399. ( 10.1666/12024) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.