Abstract
The mechanisms underlying evolutionary changes in sexual dimorphism have long been of interest to biologists. A striking gradient in sexual dichromatism exists among songbirds in North America, including the wood-warblers (Parulidae): males are generally more colourful than females at northern latitudes, while the sexes are similarly ornamented at lower latitudes. We use phylogenetically controlled comparative analysis to test three non-mutually exclusive hypotheses for the evolution of sexual dichromatism among wood-warblers. The first two hypotheses focus on the loss of female coloration with the evolution of migration, either owing to the costs imposed by visual predators during migration, or owing to the relaxation of selection for female social signalling at higher latitudes. The third hypothesis focuses on whether sexual dichromatism evolved owing to changes in male ornamentation as the strength of sexual selection increases with breeding latitude. To test these hypotheses, we compared sexual dichromatism to three variables: the presence of migration, migration distance, and breeding latitude. We found that the presence of migration and migration distance were both positively correlated with sexual dichromatism, but models including breeding latitude alone were not strongly supported. Ancestral state reconstruction supports the hypothesis that the ancestral wood-warblers were monochromatic, with both colourful males and females. Combined, these results are consistent with the hypotheses that the evolution of migration is associated with the relaxation of selection for social signalling among females and that there are increased predatory costs along longer migratory routes for colourful females. These results suggest that loss of female ornamentation can be a driver of sexual dichromatism and that social or natural selection may be a stronger contributor to variation in dichromatism than sexual selection.
Keywords: evolutionary loss, female ornamentation, sexual dimorphism, latitudinal gradient, social selection, sexual selection
1. Introduction
The evolution of sexually dimorphic ornamentation has long been of interest to biologists [1]. Historic explanations have centred on the hypothesis that male and female ornamental phenotypes are driven apart when males are subject to positive directional selection for sexual signalling, while females maintain a non-signalling phenotype [2]. This hypothesis proposes that selection, acting on males, drives male ornamental expression away from a naturally selected optimum for crypsis [3]. However, this viewpoint does not acknowledge that sexual differences in ornamentation can arise owing to evolutionary changes in female signalling phenotype (for review, see [2,4]). In recent decades, the study of sexual/social signalling has shifted towards considering evolutionary changes in females [5–8]. Research has provided compelling evidence that the female ornamental phenotype is not under strong constraint due to genetic correlation and that female ornamental traits can change independently of male phenotype [9,10]. Such changes in female ornamentation have been inferred from recent research demonstrating female-specific functions of ornamentation in communication [11,12] and from comparative studies which have shown that female ornamental phenotype is evolutionarily labile, either becoming more or less exaggerated when compared with male ornamentation [5,10,13–16]. A notable example comes from Martin and Badyaev's work, indicating that females evolve drabber plumage when they are subject to greater nest predation [6]. These studies indicate that the evolutionary loss of character states, in either males or females, may be an important driver of sexual dichromatism [15,17], and underscore the need to focus on selective pressures acting on female phenotypes to better understand signal evolution [18].
Among North American birds, there is a remarkable geographical pattern in sexual dimorphism, wherein sexual dichromatism becomes more pronounced at higher latitudes: females tend to be less ornamented than males among species breeding at northern latitudes, while species breeding at southern latitudes tend to have similarly colourful males and females [19,20]. This latitudinal gradient has been noted broadly across North American passerines [19] and waterfowl [21], and specifically across New World orioles and wood-warblers [22]; however, only the waterfowl study was analysed in a phylogenetic context. Although this geographical gradient has been widely recorded, little comparative research has tested how changes in female phenotype contribute to this pattern (but see [5,8,14]).
Here, we use phylogenetically controlled comparative analyses to test three non-mutually exclusive hypotheses for the evolution of sexual dichromatism among New World wood-warblers, a group in which sexual dichromatism increases along a latitudinal gradient [22]. The first two hypotheses are female-centric and posit that dichromatism arose due to female loss of coloration with the evolution of migration. The first proposed mechanism is that females face greater net costs, compared with males, of being colourful during migration owing to risks of being detected by visual predators. Because males are expected to gain greater reproductive benefits from ornamentation on breeding grounds, we expect predation costs to have a more substantial net-negative effect on female ornamentation, and for these costs to drive female colour away from the male-like phenotype. There is compelling evidence that predation by visual predators is high along migratory routes [23,24], that coloration can increase susceptibility to predation [25–27] and that mortality increases with migratory distance [28]. We thus propose that the cost of being colourful increases with migratory distance owing to greater exposure to visual predators. This ‘migration cost hypothesis’ has not previously been tested, and predicts that the evolution of migration will occur in concordance with the evolution of dichromatism and that the degree of sexual dichromatism will increase with migration distance.
The second proposed mechanism regarding female loss of coloration posits that once migration evolves, females are released from positive selection pressure for signalling. This hypothesis has been proposed previously [8] and derives from the observation that migratory species typically do not invest in territorial defence [29], while females of many non-migratory species do [30,31]. Furthermore, there is growing evidence that female ornamentation is favoured for territorial and resource defence [5,30,32–36], especially among non-migratory birds where territories are maintained year-round [36–38]. As such, this ‘relaxed social selection hypothesis’ proposes that female ornamentation is selectively disfavoured among migratory species, not because of the costs of migration (as per the first hypothesis), but because migratory females are no longer gaining the selective benefits associated with signalling during territorial defence. Similar to the ‘migration cost hypothesis’, this hypothesis predicts that the evolution of migration will occur in concordance with the evolution of sexual dichromatism, but this hypothesis makes no prediction about migratory distance.
In addition, we test a third, male-centric hypothesis that focuses on increases in male ornamentation with breeding latitude. This hypothesis proposes that sexual dichromatism will increase with breeding latitude because sexual selection is stronger at northern latitudes [20]. There is evidence that the shortened breeding season at northern latitudes favours male–male competition [39,40], leading to greater opportunity for selection because synchronized breeding reduces costs to females exhibiting mate choice [41] and because breeding synchrony leads to an increased opportunity for extra-pair copulations [42,43]. Thus, this ‘breeding-latitude hypothesis’ proposes that there will be greater sexual selection for male ornamentation with increasing latitude, and thus predicts that sexual dichromatism will increase with breeding latitude.
The family Parulidae is a diverse group that varies greatly in sexual dichromatism, seasonal migration distances and breeding latitude [44,45]. To test the three hypotheses for the evolution of sexual dichromatism among wood-warblers, we used phylogenetically controlled comparative methods to correlate sexual dichromatism with the following three variables: (i) migratory presence or absence, which tests both the ‘migration cost hypothesis’ and the ‘relaxed social selection hypothesis’; (ii) migratory distance, which tests the ‘migration cost hypothesis’; and (iii) breeding latitude, which tests the ‘breeding-latitude hypothesis’. We additionally determined the ancestral character state of both sexual dichromatism and migratory behaviour among the entire clade of wood-warblers to assess the origin of elaborate female characters within this group and to assess ancestral patterns of migration. Results from these tests will indicate whether a significant amount of variation in sexual dichromatism can be attributed to the loss of female coloration or to the gain of male coloration.
2. Material and methods
(a). Natural history of study group
There are 108 species of wood-warblers (this includes two genetically distinct subspecies, see figure 1), and although they range widely through the New World and are distributed both above and below the equator, all of the migratory species (n = 48) migrate north for the breeding season and south for the winter [44]. Some wood-warblers have two distinct plumages per year; however, the pre-alternate moult (moulting into breeding plumage) occurs while on the wintering grounds, so all migratory wood-warblers fly northwards in their breeding plumage.
Figure 1.
Two ancestral state reconstructions using the entire wood-warbler phylogeny from Lovette et al. [46] based on a maximum-likelihood estimation model that assumes equal evolutionary rates. For both trees, the boxes at the tips represent the trait possessed by the extant species. The left-hand reconstruction depicts sexual dichromatism, with each pie diagram representing the estimated sexual dichromatism/monochromatism score for that node: white, monochromatism; green, low dichromatism; yellow, medium dichromatism and red, high dichromatism (column A). Numbers by nodes of major clades represent the ratio of dichromatic species to the total number of species in that clade. The right-hand reconstruction is of migratory behaviour (presence/absence) recreating fig. 2 from Winger et al. [45]. Non-migrants are white and migrants are black (column C). In addition to presenting data on the presence or absence of migration, we also provide information on migration distance for all extant species (column B). The five categories were created by separating migratory distance into four quartiles: (1) non-migrant (white; migration distance = 0 km); (2) short distance (green; migration distance between 1076 and 3691 km); (3) medium distance (yellow; migration distance between 3691 and 4634 km); (4) long distance (orange; migration distance between 4634 and 6310 km); and (5) very long distance (red; migration distance between 6310 and 10 300 km).
(b). Quantifying sexual dichromatism
To quantify sexual dichromatism in colour and pattern, we calculated a sexual dichromatism score for each species of wood-warblers based on plumage colour and pattern differences between males and females. Following Martin et al. [47], we used a human visual ranking system to calculate this score. Human evaluation of dichromatism is common practice in studies of avian coloration [48,49], and recent studies designed to test whether dichromatism ratings based on human evaluation are comparable to those created with an objective spectrometer found the two approaches highly comparable [50,51]. Human observers are thought to provide a highly meaningful assessment of overall colour differences because humans are able to simultaneously evaluate and integrate multiple components of a signalling phenotype, such as colour, patch size and shape, while data from a spectrometer lack this integration [47].
Five observers that were blind to the focus of the study categorized dichromatism for each species on a five-point scale, using digital images from the Handbook of the Birds of the World (HBW [44]). When there was only one drawing for a species in the HBW, which is the standard practice when the male and female of a species are indistinguishable, we considered the species monochromatic. These monochromatic birds were given a score of 0 (n = 62 species). Because the vast majority of monochromatic wood-warblers display some degree of plumage elaboration (except possibly Leucopeza semperi and Limnothlypis swainsonii), it was not necessary to divide monochromatic birds into elaborate versus dull groups. Among dichromatic species (n = 46 species), scores ranged between 1, for a minimal degree of dichromatism, and 4, for a maximum degree of dichromatism. Observers were presented with images of a male and female from one dichromatic species at a time, and all notations of male and female designation on the images were removed. To encourage detailed observation of plumage differences between the sexes, observers were asked to write down three visible differences for each male–female pair. When the HBW recognized subspecies, we used sequential coin tosses to randomly select one representative subspecies. Scores given by different observers were highly similar (intraclass correlation = 0.74, F47,188 = 15.53, p < 0.001). Using scores from the five observers, we computed a mean dichromatism score for each dichromatic species.
(c). Quantifying migration distance and breeding latitude
Migration distance was determined for each species using GIS mapping software, DIVA-GIS v. 7.5 [52], and species range maps were downloaded from www.natureserve.org [53]. We measured migration distance by a centroid distance for each species, defined as the distance between the latitude of the centroid within the wintering range to the latitude of the centroid of the breeding range. We determined centroids (or geometric centre) by tracing the perimeter of each seasonal range and used DIVA-GIS to calculate the arithmetic mean of the resulting polygons. To measure the latitudinal distances between the breeding and wintering centroids, we used Geographic Distance Matrix Generator from the American Museum of Natural History [54]. For three species (Setophaga pitiayumi, Basileuterus lachrymosa and Cardenllina rubrifrons), it was not clear whether the species was migratory (i.e. only subpopulations migrated, or altitudinal migrations occurred), and we identified them as non-migratory following the designations of Winger et al. [45]. All statistical analyses (see below) were run both with these three species included and with them excluded. Results from these two approaches were qualitatively similar, so we report here only the analysis that included these species.
Breeding latitude was determined by the centroid latitude of the breeding range. For non-migratory species, we used the centroid of the year-round range as the breeding latitude. For species that breed south of the equator (non-migrants only; n = 21), we positivized breeding latitudes, allowing our measure to represent distance from the equator and degree of seasonality.
(d). Relationship between sexual dichromatism: migration, migration distance and breeding latitude
We addressed the following questions: does dichromatism in wood-warblers relate to: (i) the presence or absence of migration, (ii) migratory distance, and (iii) breeding latitude. All statistical analyses were conducted in the statistical computing environment R [55]. For all analyses, we used the robust wood-warbler phylogeny from Lovette et al. [46], recently resolved using two mitochondrial DNA regions and six nuclear DNA loci, and estimated using RaxML maximum-likelihood analysis (figure 1). The phylogeny included one recent polytomy involving Geothlypis flavovelata, Geothlypis trichas and Geothlypis nelsoni. We dealt with this polytomy by conducting our analyses of the entire Parulidae clade using three trees, each including one of the three possible resolutions of the polytomy; however, because results from these analyses were qualitatively the same, we present the results based on one arbitrarily chosen tree (with G. flavovelata and G. trichas as sister taxa). In all analyses, we used Pagel's λ as a measure of phylogenetic signal and calculated λ from the residuals of each model [56].
To test whether dichromatism is related to the presence or absence of migration, we used phylogenetic ANOVA [57] conducted with the phytools packages in R [58]. To test whether dichromatism was related to migration distance and/or breeding latitude, we used a combination of phylogenetic least-squares analyses (PGLS [56]) and Akiake's information criteria (AIC), which enabled us to test the relative explanatory power of migration distance and breeding latitude on the evolution of sexual dichromatism, while allowing for the possibility that all hypotheses could be supported (i.e. both natural selection for dull female ornamentation and sexual selection for exaggerated male ornamentation may occur simultaneously). The AIC approach is appropriate here because the two variables are highly correlated (PGLS: p < 0.0001, R2 = 0.66), and AIC analysis is robust to colinearity [59,60]. We conducted PGLS analysis through the R package nlme [61] to compare univariate models of migratory distance and breeding latitude, a combination model that included both distance and latitude, and a null model, and we calculated ΔAIC, Akaike weights, and the evidence ratio of each model.
To further explore whether there is an increase in dichromatism with migratory distance, we analysed only migratory wood-warblers, using the same combination of PGLS [56] and AIC described above. For this analysis, we pruned the wood-warbler phylogeny of all non-migratory species using the drop.tip command in the R package ape [62].
(e). Correlated evolution between migration and dichromatism
To test for an association between evolutionary transitions in the presence or absence of migratory behaviour with the presence or absence of sexual dichromatism, we use the concentrated changes test (CCT [63]), which tests for associations between the gains and losses of each trait. We used MacClade v. 4.0 [64] to perform the CCT using migratory behaviour as our independent character. We used both character optimization techniques (Deltran and Acctran [64]) to remove ambiguity in the evolutionary reconstructions of each character and performed CCT on each reconstruction. Results from both reconstructions were qualitatively the same, so we only present results from the Acctran optimization. In addition to using the CCT, we used Pagel's correlated test [65] to evaluate models of independent and dependent evolution between migratory behaviour and the presence or absence of dichromatism. This analysis was conducted using Mesquite [66].
(f). Ancestral state reconstruction of dichromatism and migration distance
To estimate sexual dichromatism of the most recent common ancestor of all wood-warblers, we sorted sexual dichromatism scores into four categories: (i) monochromatic; (ii) low sexual dichromatism (dichromatism scores between = 1.0–1.9; mean ± s.e. = 1.4 ± 0.08, n = 14); (iii) medium sexual dichromatism (scores between = 2.0–2.9; 2.3 ± 0.08, n = 18); and (iv) high sexual dichromatism (scores between = 3.0–4.0; 3.5 ± 0.09, n = 14).
We used the ace command in the R package ape [62] to conduct ancestral state reconstruction of sexual dichromatism and migration distance. For our ancestral state reconstruction of the discrete measure of sexual dichromatism, we used an approach following methods of Schluter et al. [67], which calculates state likelihoods at each node to determine the final maximum likelihood of the ancestral state. In our analysis, we assumed that transitions between dichromatism occurred with equal rates. We also conducted an ancestral state reconstruction of the presence or absence of migration, as was previously reported in Winger et al. [45], following methods described above.
3. Results
(a). Sexual dichromatism versus presence/absence of migration
Our analysis of the binomial categorization of the presence or absence of migration indicated that migratory wood-warblers exhibited greater sexual dichromatism (mean ± s.e. dichromatism score = 1.8 ± 0.18, n = 48) than did non-migratory species (0.4 ± 0.13, n = 60; ANOVA: F1,106 = 41.5, p = 0.002; figure 2). Monochromatism was very common among non-migrating species (51 out of 60, 85%), and far less prevalent among migratory wood-warblers (11 out of 48, 23%; χ12 = 39.5, p < 0.0001). These results indicate that migratory species are more likely to be dichromatic, and have a higher degree of dichromatism, than non-migratory species.
Figure 2.

Mean sexual dichromatism score (error bars: ± s.e.) between non-migrants and migrants for all of wood-warblers.
(b). Sexual dichromatism versus migration distance and breeding latitude
When comparing four models predicting sexual dichromatism (migration distance, breeding latitude, combination of both migration distance and breeding latitude, and null), the strongest model was the migration distance model (Akaike weight = 0.60; table 1). The migration distance model significantly predicted sexual dichromatism (p < 0.0001; R2 = 0.26), with a significant phylogenetic signal (λ = 0.74, p < 0.0001). Additionally, the migration distance model was almost twice as likely as the next highest model—the combination model (Akaike weight = 0.38, ΔAIC = 0.93, evidence ratio = 1.6). Further, the migration distance model was many times more likely than either of the remaining models—the breeding latitude model (Akaike weight = 0.02, ΔAIC = 6.62, evidence ratio = 27.3) and the null model (Akaike weight < 0.01, ΔAIC = 30.50, evidence ratio > 100).
Table 1.
Results from AIC analyses on all wood-warblers, evaluating four possible models for the evolution of sexual dichromatism. (All models were conducted using PGLS.)
| model | AIC | ΔAIC | Akaike weight | evidence ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| migration distance | 282.5 | — | 0.60 | — |
| migration distance + breeding latitude | 283.5 | 0.93 | 0.38 | 1.6 |
| breeding latitude | 289.2 | 6.62 | 0.02 | 27.3 |
| null | 313.0 | 30.50 | 0.00 | >100 |
When an identical analysis was conducted on the pruned dataset including only migratory wood-warblers, the strongest model was again the migration distance model (Akaike weight = 0.44; table 2). The migration distance model significantly predicted sexual dichromatism (p = 0.049; R2 = 0.08) and there was a significant phylogenetic signal in this trait (λ = 0.74, p = 0.04). The migration distance model was over twice as likely as any of the other models—the breeding-latitude model (Akaike weight = 0.21, ΔAIC = 1.44, evidence ratio = 2.1), the combination model (Akaike weight = 0.19, ΔAIC = 1.69, evidence ratio = 2.3) and the null model (Akaike weight = 0.16, ΔAIC = 1.95, evidence ratio = 2.7). Similar to the above analysis on the entire clade of wood-warblers, these results indicate that migration distance has more explanatory power than breeding latitude and indicate that an incremental increase in migratory distance is associated with a concomitant increase in dichromatism.
Table 2.
Results from AIC analyses on only migratory wood-warblers, evaluating four possible models for the evolution of sexual dichromatism. (All models were conducted using PGLS.)
| model | AIC | ΔAIC | Akaike weight | evidence ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| migration distance | 151.3 | — | 0.44 | — |
| migration distance + breeding latitude | 152.8 | 1.44 | 0.21 | 2.1 |
| breeding latitude | 153.0 | 1.69 | 0.19 | 2.3 |
| null | 153.3 | 1.95 | 0.16 | 2.7 |
(c). Correlated evolution between migration and dichromatism
When evaluating the concordant evolution of migratory behaviour and sexual dichromatism, we found 14 changes in the presence or absence of sexual dichromatism (eight gains and six losses), and these changes were significantly associated with evolutionary changes in migratory behaviour (Pagel's correlation test: p < 0.0001). In particular, three gains of sexual dichromatism were coupled with gains in migration at the same node, and three losses of sexual dichromatism were coupled with losses of migration at the same node, while most other gains/losses followed similar patterns through relative associations. In addition, we found that the dependent evolutionary model was significantly more likely (log likelihood = −77.2) than the independent evolutionary model (log likelihood = −94.7) for the evolution of sexual dichromatism and migratory behaviour (likelihood ratio test = 17.5, p < 0.0001). Thus, the evolution of sexual dichromatism is significantly related to the evolution of migratory behaviour.
(d). Ancestral state reconstruction of sexual dichromatism and migration distance
Using categorical measures of monochromatism and dichromatism, our ancestral state reconstruction for sexual dichromatism demonstrated overwhelming support for the hypothesis that ‘monochromatism’ was the most likely character state for the ancestor of wood-warblers (likelihood = 0.92; figure 1). Our reconstruction of migratory behaviour mirrored Winger et al. [45] and supported the hypothesis that the ancestral wood-warbler was a migrant (likelihood = 0.91; figure 1).
4. Discussion
To examine evolutionary pressures that underlie the often-noted latitudinal gradient of sexual dichromatism found among many North American avian taxa [19,22], we studied evolutionary transitions in dichromatism among wood-warblers. We tested two hypotheses that focused on mechanisms for the loss of female ornamentation with migration, and one hypothesis that focused on the gain of male elaboration with increasing breeding latitude. We found that migration itself was strongly associated with increased sexual dichromatism and that this pattern was largely driven by the gain of dichromatism. Second, we studied graded transitions in dichromatism and found that the distance a species travels during migration was positively related to sexual dichromatism, wherein long-distance migrants tended to be represented by species with distinct males and females, while the sexes of short-distance migrants were more similar to one another. At the same time, our models failed to indicate that breeding latitude was strongly associated with increased sexual dichromatism, when compared with migration distance, thus demonstrating that changes in male coloration were not a strong driving force for the evolution of sexual dichromatism. Furthermore, our ancestral state reconstruction provided strong support for the hypothesis that the ancestor of wood-warblers was monochromatic, indicating that sexual differences in plumage elaboration represents a derived trait within this clade. Taken together, these results suggest that the sexual differences in ornamentation of many migratory wood-warblers arose, at least in part, due to the loss of female coloration. These results highlight the importance of considering evolutionary changes to female signal phenotype, and how the loss of female ornamentation can drive the evolution of sexual dichromatism.
Based on these results, we suggest that two mechanisms (relaxed social selection, and costs associated with migrating long distances) have simultaneously accounted for the loss of elaborate female plumage among many migratory wood-warblers. We propose a two-tiered effect of migration on female ornamentation, where the advent of migration leads to a relaxation of selection for signalling on females, and that once released from signalling, the cost of maintaining colourful plumage while migrating long distances further leads to a reduction in female ornamentation.
The first mechanism underlying the reduction in female ornamentation with migration involves the loss of signalling benefits to females, wherein migratory females no longer benefit by maintaining elaborate plumage that was previously used to communicate fighting ability during territorial defence (i.e. signal of status [68]). This hypothesis is consistent with previous work indicating that most migratory females arrive on breeding grounds after the males, and that migratory females play little role in territorial defence [29] and, as such, have reduced benefits associated with signals of status. By contrast, female territorial defence commonly occurs in non-migratory tropical species [30,31], and a growing body of literature supports the functional role of female ornamentation in mediating social conflict [35], especially among year-round residents [38,69]. We propose that after migration evolved in some groups of wood-warblers (e.g. Setophaga), females faced reduced selection for status signalling, and then drift or selection for crypsis reduced female ornamental phenotype away from the ancestral male-typical expression. This interpretation is in agreement with previous work indicating a link between the evolution of sexual dichromatism and the presence of migration ([6], but see [14]; see [17] for a similar pattern in sexual dimorphism in song). If this interpretation is correct, then the often-noted geographical pattern of sexual dichromatism seen in many avian taxa may have arisen, in part, because selection pressures for signalling have been relaxed in females of migratory species. It is also interesting to consider that there are fewer year-round residents as one moves north from the tropics [29]. As such, the observation that breeding latitude contributes to some of the variation in sexual dichromatism may not reflect increasing sexual selection in males with breeding latitude (i.e. the breeding-latitude hypothesis), as has been proposed, but instead may indicate that females which breed further from the equator are released from signalling for territorial defence. To address this hypothesis, we recommend that future research test for a reduction along a latitudinal gradient of both female territoriality and the use of female ornamentation to signal status.
The second proposed mechanism to account for the loss of ornamentation among migratory females is that coloration is costly to maintain during migration. Migration is known to negatively affect fitness in a number of ways, especially owing to predation when migrants find themselves in reduced energetic condition at stopover sites in unfamiliar locations or habitats [23,24,70]. There is evidence that coloration can increase susceptibility to predation [25–27] and that predation risks increase with greater dispersal distance [71]. In addition, recent evidence indicates that long-distance migrants suffer greater morality than short-distance migrants [28], which may occur, in part, due to increased predation risks with migratory distance. In addition to predation, the costs of producing coloration may further add to the costs faced by colourful migrants [72]. Producing colourful traits, such as carotenoid-based plumage, may be costly because once these dietary derived compounds are deposited in feathers, they are unavailable for other physiological functions [73,74]. As such, a trade-off may exist between the degree of ornamentation and physiological performance during a migration. Irrespective of the specific costs associated with being colourful while migrating, our results, which demonstrate a positive relationship between migratory distance and dichromatism, are consistent with the hypothesis that costs increase in concert with migration distance. Although our results indicate that this pattern is heavily driven by the evolution migration behaviour (see discussion above on the relaxed social selection hypothesis), the positive relationship between dichromatism and migratory distance persists, though to a lesser degree, when analysing only migratory wood-warblers. This study provides, to our knowledge, the first support for the ‘migration distance hypothesis’ and provides compelling evidence that costs associated with ornamentation can lead to evolutionary losses in character states that lead to sexual dichromatism.
Although increasing breeding latitude is likely to result in an increase in the opportunity for sexual selection acting on males [20], our models indicate that breeding latitude was not as strongly supported as migratory distance in predicting sexual dichromatism. As such, it appears that evolutionary increases in male ornamentation are not the primary driving force behind the evolution of sexual dichromatism (as has been generally assumed), but rather, that changes in female ornamentation are more likely to contribute to the evolution of sexual dichromatism. These results provide cautionary evidence that researchers should be hesitant to use sexual dichromatism as an indicator of the strength of sexual selection acting on males (as is often done in comparative research) because, even when comparing highly dimorphic species to monomorphic species, the differences in the sexes may arise owing to changes in female characters.
Our current study found that the ancestor of Parulidae was a non-migrant, which is in agreement with previous work on this clade [45]. These results indicated that many derived non-migratory clades descended from non-migratory ancestors (Setophaga, Cardellina and Geothlypis; figure 1), and our correlated evolution test indicated that when migration was gained there was a significant pattern of concordant changes from monochromatism to dichromatism, further supporting for the hypotheses that females lost coloration with migration. In addition, we found that losses in migratory behaviour were concordant with losses of dichromatism. We note that the associated pattern between migration and dichromatism is not as strong within clades that maintained migration from a migratory ancestor (see Oreothlypis, figure 1), while this pattern is prevalent among groups that lost migratory behaviour, or those that lost and then subsequently regained migratory behaviour (see Setophaga, figure 1). Taken together, these results provide strong support for the hypothesis that the loss of female coloration is linked to evolutionary transitions in migratory behaviour.
In conclusion, this study tested multiple hypotheses for the evolution of sexual dichromatism among wood-warblers, and our results shed light on the often-noted geographical pattern of increased sexual dichromatism with latitude. We provide strong support for the hypothesis that the ancestral character state for females was monochromatic and that dichromatism among wood-warblers often arose owing to the loss of female coloration. In testing for the mechanisms underlying these changes, we found support for two female-centric hypotheses that focus on evolutionary loss of female coloration, rather than increases in male coloration. Although it has long been understood that selection on male ornamentation influences the evolution of sexual dichromatism owing to varying strengths of social or sexual selection, research in recent decades has correctly emphasized that much remains to be learned about how selection operates on elaborate traits in females [9,18,38,75]. Our current study provides evidence that social and natural selection can be a driver of sexual dichromatism and may be a stronger contributor to variation in dichromatism than sexual selection. Like other recent studies focusing on the evolution of sexual dichromatism, we urge future research on sexual patterns in ornamentation to consider that losses in female ornamentation may strongly contribute to the evolution of sexual dichromatism.
Acknowledgements
We thank Irby Lovette and co-authors for sharing their wood-warbler phylogeny. We are grateful to Trinity University students for scoring dichromatism. We also thank David Ribble, Jeremy Donald and Paulo Pulgarin-Restrepo for help with GIS methods; Keith Tarvin and Russell Ligon for help with statistical analyses, and Liam Revell for advice on phylogenetic analysis. Keith Tarvin, Bruce Lyon, David Ribble and two anonymous reviewers provided useful comments on a previous version of the manuscript. We thank Trinity University Department of Biology for providing the resources to complete this study.
Data accessibility
All data used in analyses are publicly available at the Trinity University Digital Commons (http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/bio_faculty/56/).
Authors' contributions
T.G.M. conceived of the study; R.K.S. and T.G.M. designed the study and collected the data; R.K.S., M.A.J. and T.G.M. analysed the data; R.K.S. and T.G.M. drafted the manuscript; and all authors edited and approved the final version for publication.
Competing interests
We declare we have no competing interests.
Funding
T.G.M. was supported by the Faculty Development Fund and R.K.S. was supported by undergraduate research funding through the Biology department at Trinity University.
References
- 1.Darwin C. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London, UK: John Murray. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wallace AR. 1889. Darwinism. London, UK: MacMillan and Co. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fisher RA. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford, UK: Clarendon. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Omland KE, Hofmann CM. 2006. Adding color to the past: ancestral state reconstruction of bird coloration. In Bird coloration volume 2: function and evolution (eds Hill GE, McGraw KJ.), pp. 417–454. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Irwin RE. 1994. The evolution of plumage dichromatism in the New World blackbirds: social selection on female brightness. Am. Nat. 144, 890–907. ( 10.1086/285717) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martin TE, Badyaev AV. 1996. Sexual dichromatism in birds: importance of nest predation and nest location for females versus males. Evolution 50, 2454–2460. ( 10.2307/2410712) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hofmann CM, Cronin T, Omland KE. 2006. Using spectral data to reconstruct evolutionary changes in coloration: carotenoid color evolution in New World orioles. Evolution 60, 1680–1691. ( 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00512.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Friedman NR, Hofmann CM, Kondo B, Omland KE. 2009. Correlated evolution of migration and sexual dichromatism in the New World orioles (Icterus). Evolution 63, 3269–3274. ( 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00792.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kraaijeveld K, Kraaijeveld-Smit FJL, Komdeur J. 2007. The evolution of mutual ornamentation. Anim. Behav. 74, 657–677. ( 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.027) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Price JJ, Lanyon SM, Omland KE. 2009. Losses of female song with changes from tropical to temperate breeding in the New World blackbirds. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 1971–1980. ( 10.1098/rspb.2008.1626) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Murphy TG, Rosenthal MF, Montgomerie R, Tarvin KA. 2009. Female American goldfinches use carotenoid-based bill coloration to signal status. Behav. Ecol. 20, 1348–1355. ( 10.1093/beheco/arp140) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Crowhurst CJ, Zanollo V, Griggio M, Robertson J, Kleindorfer S. 2012. White flank spots signal feeding dominance in female diamond firetails, Stagonopleura guttata. Ethology 118, 63–75. ( 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01986.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Price T, Birch GL. 1996. Repeated evolution of sexual color dimorphism in passerine birds. Auk 113, 842–848. ( 10.2307/4088862) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Price JJ, Eaton MD. 2014. Reconstructing the evolution of sexual dichromatism: current color diversity does not reflect past rates of male and female change. Evolution 68, 2026–2037. ( 10.1111/evo.12417) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hofmann CM, Cronin TW, Omland KE. 2008. Evolution of sexual dichromatism. 1. Convergent losses of elaborate female coloration in New World orioles (Icterus spp.). Auk 125, 778–789. ( 10.1525/auk.2008.07112) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Burns KJ. 1998. A phylogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual dichromatism in tanagers (Thraupidae): the role of female versus male plumage. Evolution 52, 1219–1224. ( 10.2307/2411252) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wiens JJ. 2001. Widespread loss of sexually selected traits: how the peacock lost its spots. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 517–523. ( 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02217-0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Amundsen T. 2000. Why are female birds ornamented? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 149–155. ( 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01800-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bailey SF. 1978. Latitudinal gradients in colors and patterns of passerine birds. Condor 80, 372–381. ( 10.2307/1367187) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Badyaev AV, Hill GE. 2003. Avian sexual dichromatism in relation to phylogeny and ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 27–49. ( 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132441) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Scott DK, Clutton-Brock TH. 1990. Mating systems, parasites and plumage dimorphism in waterfowl. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26, 261–273. ( 10.1007/BF00178319) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hamilton TH. 1961. On the functions and causes of sexual dimorphism in breeding plumage characters of North American species of warblers and orioles. Am. Nat. 95, 121–123. ( 10.1086/282167) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lindström Å. 1989. Finch flock size and risk of hawk predation at a migratory stopover site. Auk 106, 225–232. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Alerstam T, Hedenström A, Åkesson S. 2003. Long-distance migration: evolution and determinants. Oikos 2, 247–260. ( 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12559.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Caldwell GS. 1986. Predation as a selective force on foraging herons: effects of plumage color and flocking. Auk 103, 494–505. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Slagsvold T, Dale S, Kruszewicz A. 1995. Predation favours cryptic coloration in breeding male pied flycatchers. Anim. Behav. 50, 1109–1121. ( 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80110-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Huhta E, Rytkönen S, Solonén T. 2003. Plumage brightness of prey increases predation risk: an among-species comparison. Ecology 84, 1793–1799. ( 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1793:PBOPIP]2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lok T, Overdijk O, Piersma T. 2015. The cost of migration: spoonbills suffer higher mortality during trans-Saharan spring migrations only. Biol. Lett. 11, 20140944 ( 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0944) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stutchbury BJM, Morton ES. 2001. Behavioral ecology of tropical birds. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tobias JA, Gamarra-Toledo V, García-Olaechea D, Pulgarín PC, Seddon N. 2011. Year-round resource defence and the evolution of male and female song in suboscine birds: social armaments are mutual ornaments. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 2118–2138. ( 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02345.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Illes AE. 2015. Context of female bias in song repertoire size, singing effort, and singing independence in a cooperatively breeding songbird. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 69, 139–150. ( 10.1007/s00265-014-1827-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.West-Eberhard MJ. 1979. Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 123, 222–234. [Google Scholar]
- 33.West-Eberhard MJ. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58, 155–183. ( 10.1086/413215) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rubenstein DR, Lovette IJ. 2009. Reproductive skew and selection on female ornamentation in social species. Nature 462, 786–789. ( 10.1038/nature08614) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rubenstein DR. 2012. Sexual and social competition: broadening perspectives by defining female roles. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 2248–2252. ( 10.1098/rstb.2011.0278) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Murphy TG, Hernández-Muciño D, Osorio-Beristain M, Montgomerie R, Omland KE. 2009. Carotenoid-based status signaling by females in the tropical streak-backed oriole. Behav. Ecol. 20, 1000–1006. ( 10.1093/beheco/arp089) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Whittingham LA, Kirkconnell A, Ratcliffe LM. 1992. Differences in song and sexual dimorphism between Cuban and North American red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Auk 109, 928–933. ( 10.2307/4088178) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tobias JA, Montgomerie R, Lyon BE. 2012. The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 2274–2293. ( 10.1098/rstb.2011.0280) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Catchpole CK. 1980. Sexual selection and the evolution of complex songs among European warblers of the genus Acrocephalus. Behaviour 74, 149–166. ( 10.1163/156853980X00366) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Catchpole CK. 1982. The evolution of bird sounds in relation to mating and spacing behavior. In Acoustic communication in birds, vol. 1 (eds Kroodsma DE, Miller EH, Ouellets H.), pp. 297–319. New York, NY: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jennions MD, Petrie M. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72, 283–327. ( 10.1017/S0006323196005014) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Stutchbury BJ, Morton ES. 1995. The effect of breeding synchrony on extra-pair mating systems in songbirds. Behaviour 132, 675–690. ( 10.1163/156853995X00081) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Spottiswoode C, Møller AP. 2004. Extrapair paternity, migration, and breeding synchrony in birds. Behav. Ecol. 15, 41–57. ( 10.1093/beheco/arg100) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Christie DA. 2010. Handbook of the birds of the world, vol. 15. Weavers to New World warblers. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Winger BM, Lovette IJ, Winkler DW. 2012. Ancestry and evolution of seasonal migration in the Parulidae. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 610–618. ( 10.1098/rspb.2011.1045) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lovette IJ, et al. 2010. A comprehensive multilocus phylogeny for the wood-warblers and a revised classification of the Parulidae (Aves). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 57, 753–770. ( 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.07.018) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Martin PR, Montgomerie R, Lougheed SC. 2010. Rapid sympatry explains greater color pattern divergence in high latitude birds. Evolution 64, 336–347. ( 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00831.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dunn PO, Whittingham LA, Pitcher TE. 2001. Mating systems, sperm competition, and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds. Evolution 55, 161–175. ( 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01281.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Montgomerie R. 2006. Analyzing colors. In Bird coloration volume 1: mechanisms and measurements (eds Hill GE, McGraw KJ.), pp. 70–147. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Armenta JK, Dunn PO, Whittingham LA. 2008. Quantifying avian sexual dichromatism: a comparison of methods. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 2423–2430. ( 10.1242/jeb.013094) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Seddon N, Tobias JA, Eaton M, Ödeen A. 2010. Human vision can provide a vaild proxy for avian perception of sexual dichromatism. Auk 127, 283–292. ( 10.1525/auk.2009.09070) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hijmans RJ, Guarino L, Bussink C, Mathur P, Cruz M, Barrentes I, Rojas R. 2004. A geographic information system for the analysis of species distribution data See www.diva-gis.org.
- 53.Ridgely RS, Allnutt TF, Brooks T, McNicol DK, Mehlman DW, Young BE, Zook JR. 2003. Digital distribution maps of the birds of the western hemisphere, v. 1 Arlington, TX: NatureServe. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ersts PJ. Geographic Distance Matrix Generator (v. 1.2.3). American Museum of Natural History, Center for Biodiversity and Conservation See http://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/gdmg.
- 55.R Development Core Team. 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. See http://www.r-project.org.
- 56.Revell LJ. 2010. Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 319–329. ( 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00044.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Garland T, Dickerman AW, Janis CM, Jones JA. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst. Biol. 42, 265–292. ( 10.1093/sysbio/42.3.265) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Revell LJ. 2012. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223. ( 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel interface: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn New York, NY: Springer. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. 2003. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Team RDC. 2013. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package v. 3.1-113. See http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/index.html. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Maddison WP. 1990. A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: are gains or losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic tree? Evolution 44, 539–557. ( 10.2307/2409434) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Maddison DR, Maddison WP. 2000. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, v. 4.0. See http://macclade.org/macclade.html.
- 65.Pagel M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255, 37–45. ( 10.1098/rspb.1994.0006) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2009. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis, v. 2.6. See https://mesquiteproject.wikispaces.com.
- 67.Schluter D, Price T, Mooers AØ, Ludwig D. 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51, 1699–1711. ( 10.2307/2410994) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rohwer S. 1975. The social significance of avian plumage variability. Evolution 29, 593–610. ( 10.2307/2407071) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Karubian J. 2013. Female ornamentation in Malurus fairy-wrens: a hidden evolutionary gem for understanding female perspectives on social and sexual selection. EMU 113, 248–258. ( 10.1071/MU12093) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Sillett TS, Holmes RT. 2002. Variation in survivorship of a migratory songbird throughout its annual cycle. J. Anim. Ecol. 71, 296–308. ( 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00599.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Yoder JM, Marschall EA, Swanson DA. 2004. The cost of dispersal: predation as a function of movement and site familiarity in ruffed grouse. Behav. Ecol. 15, 469–476. ( 10.1093/beheco/arh037) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Fitzpatrick S. 1994. Colourful migratory birds: evidence for a mechanism other than parasite resistance for the maintenance of ‘good genes’ sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 257, 155–160. ( 10.1098/rspb.1994.0109) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hill GE. 2000. Energetic constraints on expression of carotenoid-based plumage coloration. J. Avian Biol. 31, 559–566. ( 10.1034/j.1600-048X.2000.310415.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.McGraw KJ, Hill GE, Parker RS. 2005. The physiological costs of being colourful: nutritional control of carotenoid utilization in the American goldfinch, Carduelis tristis. Anim. Behav. 69, 653–660. ( 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.05.018) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Tarvin KA, Murphy TG. 2012. It isn't always sexy when both are bright and shiny: considering alternatives to sexual selection in elaborate monomorphic species. Ibis 154, 439–443. ( 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2012.01251.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data used in analyses are publicly available at the Trinity University Digital Commons (http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/bio_faculty/56/).

