Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 Oct 1;3(5):e01114-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01114-15

Genome Sequence of Stachybotrys chartarum Strain 51-11

Doris A Betancourt a,, Timothy R Dean a,, Jean Kim b, Josh Levy b
PMCID: PMC4591308  PMID: 26430036

Abstract

The Stachybotrys chartarum strain 51-11 genome was sequenced by shotgun sequencing utilizing Illumina HiSeq 2000 and PacBio technologies. Since S. chartarum has been implicated as having health impacts within water-damaged buildings, any information extracted from the genomic sequence data relating to toxins or the metabolism of the fungus might be useful.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Stachybotrys chartarum is a saprophytic fungus with worldwide distribution. In nature, it is isolated from soil, seeds, and decaying organic matter. Indoors, S. chartarum grows on wet cellulose-containing building material, such as gypsum wallboard, cardboard, and ceiling tiles (1).

S. chartarum is among the indoor fungal population frequently identified in water-damaged buildings, and it has been linked to damp building-related illnesses (DBRIs) (2). This fungus is capable of producing mycotoxins, of which the macrocyclic trichothecenes are among the most toxic (3, 4).

S. chartarum toxigenic strain 51-11, an environmental isolate obtained from the cluster of idiopathic pulmonary hemorrhage cases (Cleveland, OH) (5), is part of the RTI International (Research Triangle Park, NC) microbial collection assigned a unique identification number and stored at -80°C for long-term preservation. The fungal spores were grown in potato dextrose broth (PDB) (Becton, Dickinson & Company, Sparks, MD) and were shaken at 25°C. The resulting fungal mycelia were harvested using a sterile Miracloth (EMD Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) and washed with sterile distilled water. The mycelia were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -20°C until the genomic DNA was isolated using a protocol described by Kohler et al. (6).

Two genomic DNA libraries were produced for Illumina sequencing: one paired-end library (insert size, 350 to 390 bp) and one mate-paired library (insert size, 100 to 5000 bp). These two libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA) at Argonne National Laboratory (Lemont, IL). The machine produced 460× coverage, and approximately 100× of that coverage was actually used for the assembly, although the whole data set was exploited for error correction. The genome size was assessed using k-mer-counting tools, which pointed to a genome size of approximately 40 Mb. The resulting 40-Mb error-corrected reads were assembled on a large-memory machine using MIRA (http://genome.cshlp.org/content/14/6/1147.full). The resulting contigs were hand-edited for quality. SSPACE basic 2.0 (Leiden, The Netherlands) was run on the mate-pair data to try to close gaps and produce better scaffolds. The resulting assembly contained 2,843 scaffolds. Higher-molecular-weight DNA for PacBio long-read sequencing was also produced to close gaps in the Illumina assembly. Nine sequencing runs were performed, and after standard quality assurance/quality control cutoffs were applied, there were 284,625 reads, with ~736 million bases total (~2,600 bases per read), or ~18× coverage. Two hybrid assembly methods were compared, SSPACE-LongRead and PBJelly. Multiple combinations using both programs were performed on a supercomputing cluster, and the quality of assembly was assessed using standard metrics (N50 and N90). Three iterations of SSPACE-LongRead alone (not in combination with PBJelly) showed the highest-quality assembly, with the final number of scaffolds at 1,435, or approximately half of the Illumina assembly alone.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession no. LDEE00000000. The version described in this paper is version LDEE01000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by U.S. EPA internal funds.

We thank Grace Byfield and Anthony Devine (RTI International) for their effort and advice during the first stages of this project.

Any mention of trade names, products, or services does not imply an endorsement by the U.S. Government or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA does not endorse any commercial products, services, or enterprises. The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Footnotes

Citation Betancourt DA, Dean TR, Kim J, Levy J. 2015. Genome sequence of Stachybotrys chartarum strain 51-11. Genome Announc 3(5):e01114-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01114-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Samson RA, Hoekstra ES, Frisvad JC, Filtenborg O. 2002. Identification of the common food and airborne fungi, p 1–282. In Samson RA, Hoekstra ES, Frisvad JC, Filtenborg O (ed), Introduction to food and airborne fungi, 6th ed. Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Institute of Medicine (IOM) 2004. Damp indoor spaces and health. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jarvis BB. 2003. Stachybotrys chartarum. A fungus for our time. Phytochemistry 64:53–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pestka JJ, Yike I, Dearborn DG, Ward MD, Harkema JR. 2008. Stachybotrys chartarum. trichothecene mycotoxins, and damp building-related illness: new insights into a public health enigma. Toxicol Sci 104:4–26. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vesper SJ, Dearborn DG, Yike I, Sorenson WG, Haugland RA. 1999. Hemolysis, toxicity, and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of Stachybotrys chartarum strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:3175–3181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kohler A, Kuo A, Nagy LG, Morin E, Barry KW, Buscot F, Canback B, Choi C, Cichocki N, Clum A, Colpaert J, Copeland A, Costa MD, Dore J, Floudas D, Gay G, Girlanda M, Henrissat B, Herrmann S, Hess J, Hogberg N, Johansson T, Khouja HR, LaButti K, Lahrmann U, Levasseur A, Lindquist EA, Lipzen A, Marmeisse R, Martino E, Murat C, Ngan CY, Nehls U, Plett JM, Pringle A, Ohm RA, Perotto S, Peter M, Riley R, Rineau F, Ruytinx J, Salamov A, Shah F, Sun H, Tarkka M, Tritt A, Veneault-Fourrey C, Zuccaro A, Tunlid A, Grigoriev IV, et al.. 2015. Convergent losses of decay mechanisms and rapid turnover of symbiosis genes in mycorrhizal mutualists. Nat Genet 47:410–415. doi: 10.1038/ng.3223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES