Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 Oct 1;3(5):e01115-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01115-15

Complete Genome Sequence of Noncytopathic Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus 1 Contaminating a High-Passage RK-13 Cell Line

Bora Nam a, Ganwu Li b, Ying Zheng b, Jianqiang Zhang b, Kathleen M Shuck a, Peter J Timoney a, Udeni B R Balasuriya a,
PMCID: PMC4591309  PMID: 26430037

Abstract

A high-passage rabbit kidney RK-13 cell line (HP-RK-13[KY], originally derived from the ATCC CCL-37 cell line) used in certain laboratories worldwide is contaminated with noncytopathic bovine viral diarrhea virus (ncpBVDV). On complete genome sequence analysis, the virus strain was found to belong to BVDV group 1b.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) is a nonenveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA virus with a genome size of approximately 12.3 to 12.5 kb. The virus is a member of the genus Pestivirus in the family Flaviviridae, which also includes border disease virus and classical swine fever virus (1, 2). Two major genotypes of BVDV are recognized (types 1 [BVDV-1] and 2 [BVDV-2]). BVDV-1 strains are genetically subdivided into at least 17 subtypes (a to q) and BVDV-2 strains into four subtypes (a to d) (36). In addition, two distinct biotypes within each genotype have been identified: cytopathic viruses (cpBVDV) that cause cytopathic effects in cultured cells and noncytopathic viruses (ncpBVDV) that do not cause cytopathic effects in cultured cells (710). It was previously reported that a number of cell lines (e.g., cattle, sheep, goat, deer, bison, rabbit, and domestic cat origins), including the RK-13 cell line (CCL-37; American Type Culture Collection [ATCC], Manassas, VA) are persistently infected with ncpBVDV, resulting from the use of BVDV-contaminated fetal bovine serum in cell culture medium (1115). Many laboratories use the RK-13 cell line from the ATCC or its derivatives for research and laboratory confirmation of various viral agents. Our laboratory has been using high-passage RK-13 cells (P399-409; HP-RK-13 [KY]) for routine laboratory diagnostic investigation for >50 years (16). In this study, we determined the complete genome sequence of ncpBVDV present in the HP-RK-13 [KY] cells (P404) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology on an Illumina MiSeq platform, according to previously established procedures (17). The sequences were mapped to all known BVDVs, and mapped read sets were used for de novo assembly using ABySS version 1.3.7 (BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada) and Geneious 7.0.6 software (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand).

The complete genome of ncpBVDV contaminating the HP-RK-13 [KY] cell line (ncpBVDV HP-RK-13 [KY] strain) is composed of 12,271 nucleotides (nt) and contains a 5′ untranslated region (UTR) (386 nt), a single open reading frame (ORF) (11,697 nt [nt 387 to 12083]), and a 3′ UTR (188 nt). The single ORF encodes a 3,898-amino acid polyprotein, which is predicted to be cleaved into 12 proteins. The ncpBVDV HP-RK13 [KY] strain had 85.2% to 99.7% identity with 11 strains of BVDV-1b and 68.6% to 70.9% identity with eight strains of BVDV-2 at the whole-genome level. Interestingly, the ncpBVDV HP-RK-13 [KY] strain is very closely related to the previously described ncpBVDV present in RK-13 cells reported from Japan (RK13/E- strain [GenBank accession no. JX419397.1]; 12,064 nt, 99.7% identity) (18). The ncpBVDV HP-RK-13 [KY] strain had several nucleotide insertions and deletions compared to several of the other BVDV-1b strains. However, the specific insertion(s) and/or deletion(s) that are responsible for the establishment of persistent infection in the HP-RK-13 [KY] cell line have not been determined. Phylogenetic analysis of the complete genome sequence of the virus ncpBVDV HP-RK-13 [KY] established that it is of the BVDV-1b genotype.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The complete genomic sequence of ncpBVDV KY-HP-RK-13 strain has been submitted to GenBank under accession no. KT355592.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This study was supported by the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative competitive grant no. 2013-68004-20360 from the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA).

Footnotes

Citation Nam B, Li G, Zheng Y, Zhang J, Shuck KM, Timoney PJ, Balasuriya UBR. 2015. Complete genome sequence of noncytopathic bovine viral diarrhea virus 1 contaminating a high-passage RK-13 cell line. Genome Announc 3(5):e01115-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01115-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Colett MS, Larson R, Gold C, Strick D, Anderson DK, Purchio AF. 1988. Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of the pestivirus bovine viral diarrhea virus. Virology 165:191–199. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(88)90672-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Heinz FX, Collett MS, Purcek RH, Gould EA, Howard CRH, Moormann RJM, Rice CM, Thiel HJ. 2004. Family Flaviridae, p 981–998. In Fauquet CM, Mayo M, Maniloff J, Desselberger U, Ball LA (ed), Virus taxonomy – Eighth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Virus, Elsevier/Academic Press, San Diego, CA. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Peterhans E, Bachofen C, Stalder H, Schweizer M. 2010. Cytopathic bovine viral diarrhea viruses (BVDV): emerging pestiviruses doomed to extinction. Vet Res 41:44. doi: 10.1051/vetres/2010016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Deng Y, Shan TL, Tong W, Zheng XC, Guo YY, Zheng H, Cao SJ, Wen XT, Tong GZ. 2014. Genomic characterization of a bovine viral diarrhea virus 1 isolate from swine. Arch Virol 159:2513–2517. doi: 10.1007/s00705-014-2064-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Peletto S, Zuccon F, Pitti M, Gobbi E, Marco LD, Caramelli M, Masoero L, Acutis PL. 2012. Detection and phylogenetic analysis of an atypical pestivirus, strain IZSPLV_To. Res Vet Sci 92:147–150. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Giangaspero M, Harasawa R, Weber L, Belloli A. 2008. Genoepidemiological evaluation of bovine viral diarrhea virus 2 species based on secondary structures in the 5′ untranslated region. J Vet Med Sci 70:571–580. doi: 10.1292/jvms.70.571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ridpath JF, Bolin SR. 1998. Differentiation of types 1a, 1b and 2 bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) by PCR. Mol Cell Probes 12:101–106. doi: 10.1006/mcpr.1998.0158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fulton RW, Saliki JT, Confer AW, Burge LJ, d’Offay JM, Helman RG, Bolin SR, Ridpath JF, Payton ME. 2000. Bovine viral diarrhea virus cytopathic and noncytopathic biotypes and type 1 and 2 genotypes in diagnostic laboratory accessions: clinical and necropsy samples from cattle. J Vet Diagn Invest 12:33–38. doi: 10.1177/104063870001200106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee KM, Gillespie JH. 1957. Propagation of virus diarrhea virus of cattle in tissue culture. Am J Vet Res 18:952–953. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Underdahl NR, Grace OD, Hoerlein AB. 1957. Cultivation in tissue-culture of cytopathogenic agent from bovine mucosal disease. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 94:795–797. doi: 10.3181/00379727-94-23091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nuttall PA, Luther PD, Stott EJ. 1977. Viral contamination of bovine foetal serum and cell cultures. Nature 266:835–837. doi: 10.1038/266835a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bolin SR, Black JW, Frey ML, Katz JB, Ridpath JF, Roblin RO. 1994. Detection of a cell line contaminated with hog cholera virus. J Am Vet Med Assoc 205:742–745. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bolin SR, Matthews PJ, Ridpath JF. 1991. Methods for detection and frequency of contamination of fetal calf serum with bovine viral diarrhea virus and antibodies against bovine viral diarrhea virus. J Vet Diagn Invest 3:199–203. doi: 10.1177/104063879100300302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Levings RL, Wessman SJ. 1991. Bovine viral diarrhea virus contamination of nutrient serum, cell cultures and viral vaccines. Dev Biol Stand 75:177–181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dezengrini R, Weiblen R, Flores EF. 2006. Selection and characterization of canine, swine and rabbit cell lines resistant to bovine viral diarrhea virus. J Virol Methods 137:51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.05.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Timoney PJ, Bruser CA, McCollum WH, Holyoak GR, Little TV. 2004. Comparative sensitivity of LLC-MK2, RK-13, Vero, and equine dermis cell lines for primary isolation and propagation of equine arteritis virus, p 26–27. In Timoney PJ (ed), Proceedings of the International Workshop on the Diagnosis of Equine Arteritis Virus Infection. M. H. Gluck Equine Research Center, 20 to 21 October 2004, Lexington, KY. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen Q, Li G, Stasko J, Thomas JT, Stensland WR, Pillatzki AE, Gauger PC, Schwartz KJ, Madson D, Yoon KJ, Stevenson GW, Burrough ER, Harmon KM, Main RG, Zhang J. 2014. Isolation and characterization of porcine epidemic diarrhea viruses associated with the 2013 disease outbreak among swine in the United States. J Clin Microbiol 52:234–243. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02820-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Muhsen M, Aoki H, Ikeda H, Fukusho A. 2013. Biological properties of bovine viral diarrhea virus quasispecies detected in the RK13 cell line. Arch Virol 158:753–763. doi: 10.1007/s00705-012-1538-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES