Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences logoLink to Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
. 2015 Aug 4;62(3):236–237. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.123

Radiation dose and image quality optimisation in medical imaging

Free book available through Open Access Publishing

Reviewed by: Peter Hogg 1,2
Edited by  Hogg Peter. and  Lanca Luis,  Open Source,  University of Salford,  UK,  2015, ISBN:  9781907482603. 
PMCID: PMC4592681

Radiation dose and image quality optimisation in medical imaging was published in the University of Salford (UK) Open Access online database in April 2015. Material held in this and similar databases is available for free via the Internet, to be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Publishing in this fashion has benefits to the author, for instance it can potentially give a greater exposure to the work, leading to more downloads and increased citations, and it complies with funding body Open Access policies. It has wider benefits too, for instance it increases access to research widening the spread of knowledge and ideas, and it increases access to publically funded research. The book can be accessed/downloaded for free - http://usir.salford.ac.uk/34439/.

The book contains 12 chapters written by students and academic university staff from five European countries, including Portugal, Switzerland, UK, Norway and the Netherlands. Staff comprised a multi professional mix, including physics, radiography, engineering and occupational therapy; students included PhD, MSc and BSc. Six chapters are literature reviews; these are associated directly with six chapters that are experimental science. Overall the book contains a range of interesting material concerned with topical areas of research. Ten chapters are concerned with reducing dose in x-ray procedures, including CT and projection radiography. Two chapters are different and they consider pressure ulcer formation in diagnostic imaging/radiotherapy from volunteers lying on two surfaces – a thin imaging couch mattress and a hard imaging couch table top. The experimental work used a pressure sensitive mat to map interface pressures between volunteers lying on the two surfaces.

The book arises from a 3 weeks residential summer school held in Lisbon in which the experimental work was conducted, analysed and presented and the review chapters were drafted. Subsequent to the summer school the draft chapters were further developed and then formatted into book style. The summer school was funded by Erasmus, a European funding initiative. One participant was funded by the Nuffield Foundation. Previously the summer school was held at the University of Salford, UK and ten publications arose from it.111 In 2015 the summer school will be held in Groningen, the Netherlands and we anticipate another Open Source book will be published based on the work undertaken.

References

  • 1.Lança L, Buissink C, Jorge J, Sanderud A, Hogg P. Guest Editorial: OPTIMAX 2013. Radiography. 2014;20:293–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Thompson JD, Manning DJ, Hogg P. Analysing data from observer studies in medical imaging research: An introductory guide to free-response techniques. Radiography. 2014;20:295–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mraity H, England A, Hogg P. Developing and validating a psychometric scale for image quality assessment. Radiography. 2014;20:306–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tootell A, Szczepura K, Hogg P. An overview of measuring and modelling dose and risk from ionising radiation for medical exposure. Radiography. 2014;20:323–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Buissink C, Thompson JD, Voet M, et al. The In fluence of experience and training in a group of novice observers: A jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Radiography. 2014;20:300–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mraity H, England A, Akhtar I, et al. Development and validation of a psychometric scale for assessing PA chest image quality: A pilot study. Radiography. 2014;20:312–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tugwell J, Everton C, Kingma A, et al. Increasing source to image distance for AP pelvis imaging impact on radiation dose and image quality. Radiography. 2014;20:351–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lança L, Franco L, Ahmed A, et al. 10 kVp rule an anthropomorphic pelvis phantom imaging study using a CR system: Impact on image quality and effective dose using AEC and manual mode. Radiography. 2014;20:333–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Reis C, Gonçalves J, Klompmaker C, et al. Image quality and dose analysis for a PA chest X-ray: Comparison between AEC mode acquisition and manual mode using the 10 kVp rule. Radiography. 2014;20:339–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Higgins R, Robinson L, Hogg P. An evaluation of the student and tutor experience of a residential summer school event (OPTIMAX) Radiography. 2014;20:363–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Robinson L, Hogg P, Higgins R. An observational study of cross-cultural communication in short-term, diverse professional learning groups. Radiography. 2014;20:356–62. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES