Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transplantation. 2015 Sep;99(9):1753. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000810

Perfusion Decellularization of Discarded Human Kidneys: A Valuable Platform for Organ Regeneration

Harald C Ott 1
PMCID: PMC4592771  NIHMSID: NIHMS684999  PMID: 26203856

In this issue of Transplantation Andrea Peloso and colleagues report on the successful application of perfusion decellularization in discarded human kidneys to generate scaffolds for organ regeneration. (1) The authors provide important insight into mechanical integrity and morphological features of the native vascular tree and examine matrix bound growth factors after perfusion decellularization of human kidneys. Both of these are fundamental scaffold properties that enable cell engraftment, tissue formation, and perfusion during culture and after transplantation.

The enthusiasm to build functional, transplantable kidney grafts from patient derived cells, is fueled by recent progress in the fields of kidney stem cell and developmental biology.[2] Through directed differentiation, human pluripotent stem cells have been successfully guided through key developmental milestones to generate cellular constituents of metanephric mesoderm, and ureteric bud.[35] Once generated in sufficient numbers and purity, these cells could be a nearly inexhaustible source of building blocks to regenerate autologous kidney tissue and possibly transplantable grafts.[6] As we begin to decifer pathways of both kidney development and adult kidney repair and regeneration, we will hopefully learn to control the process of tissue formation and eventually achieve graft homeostasis in regenerated or bioartificial constructs.[79]

One possible approach to organ engineering follows the principle of tissue engineering, in which an extracellular matrix scaffold provides the three dimensional foundation of structural boundaries, architecture, vasculature, and the cell specific niches for different endothelial, mesenchymal, and epithelial cell phenotypes.[10] Despite recent advances in additive manufacturing and other techniques, deriving scaffolds of comparable composition, scale, and complexity of mature human organs has been a challenge. Since the first report of detergent based perfusion decellularization of mammalian organs, and it’s use to engineer functional tissue in 2008,[11] this technology has been successfully applied to multiple organ systems including the heart,[12] lung,[1319] kidney,[2025] liver,[26] and pancreas.[27, 28] Detailed matrix analysis of some organ systems has been performed,[19, 29] but kidney scaffolds of human origin have yet to be fully examined. The present article provides valuable data points on composition and physical properties, and further underlines the translational value of this platform for kidney bioengineering. Future work comparing composition, growth factor levels, and mechanical properties to native developing and adult kidneys similar will be helpful to even better understand which components are preserved, and which are lost during decellularization. This will guide us in developing strategies to optimize kidney scaffolds to accommodate the myriad of different cell types required for mature organ function.

References

  • 1.Peloso A, et al. Renal ECM scaffolds from discarded kidneys maintain glomerular morphometry and vascular resilience, and retains critical growth factors. Transplantation. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000811. In press – this issue. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Little MH, McMahon AP. Mammalian kidney development: principles, progress, and projections. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4(5) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Takasato M, et al. Directing human embryonic stem cell differentiation towards a renal lineage generates a self-organizing kidney. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16(1):118–26. doi: 10.1038/ncb2894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Xia Y, et al. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent cells to ureteric bud kidney progenitor-like cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15(12):1507–15. doi: 10.1038/ncb2872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Taguchi A, et al. Redefining the in vivo origin of metanephric nephron progenitors enables generation of complex kidney structures from pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;14(1):53–67. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lam AQ, Bonventre JV. Regenerating the nephron with human pluripotent stem cells. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2015 doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kramann R, et al. Perivascular Gli1+ progenitors are key contributors to injury-induced organ fibrosis. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;16(1):51–66. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Diep CQ, et al. Identification of adult nephron progenitors capable of kidney regeneration in zebrafish. Nature. 2011;470(7332):95–100. doi: 10.1038/nature09669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Uzarski JS, et al. New strategies in kidney regeneration and tissue engineering. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2014;23(4):399–405. doi: 10.1097/01.mnh.0000447019.66970.ea. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vacanti JP, Langer R. Tissue engineering: the design and fabrication of living replacement devices for surgical reconstruction and transplantation. Lancet. 1999;354(Suppl 1):SI32–4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)90247-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ott HC, et al. Perfusion-decellularized matrix: using nature’s platform to engineer a bioartificial heart. Nat Med. 2008;14(2):213–21. doi: 10.1038/nm1684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guyette JP, et al. Perfusion decellularization of whole organs. Nat Protoc. 9(6):2014. 1451–68. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ott HC, et al. Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung. Nat Med. 2010;16(8):927–33. doi: 10.1038/nm.2193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Petersen TH, et al. Tissue-engineered lungs for in vivo implantation. Science. 2010;329(5991):538–41. doi: 10.1126/science.1189345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Price AP, et al. Development of a Decellularized Lung Bioreactor System for Bioengineering the Lung: The Matrix Reloaded. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010 doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wallis JM, et al. Comparative assessment of detergent-based protocols for mouse lung de-cellularization and re-cellularization. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2012;18(6):420–32. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2011.0567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nichols JE, et al. Production and Assessment of Decellularized Pig and Human Lung Scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;19(17–18):2045–62. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gilpin SE, et al. Perfusion decellularization of human and porcine lungs: Bringing the matrix to clinical scale. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gilpin SE, et al. Up-Scaling Decellularization and Whole Organ Culture for Human Lung Regeneration. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation. 2013;32(4):S69–S70. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Orlando G, et al. Production and implantation of renal extracellular matrix scaffolds from porcine kidneys as a platform for renal bioengineering investigations. Ann Surg. 2012;256(2):363–70. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825a02ab. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Song JJ, et al. Regeneration and experimental orthotopic transplantation of a bioengineered kidney. Nat Med. 2013;19(5):646–651. doi: 10.1038/nm.3154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ross EA, et al. Embryonic Stem Cells Proliferate and Differentiate when Seeded into Kidney Scaffolds. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2009;20(11):2338–2347. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008111196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nakayama KH, et al. Decellularized rhesus monkey kidney as a three-dimensional scaffold for renal tissue engineering. Tissue engineering Part A. 2010;16(7):2207–16. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bonandrini B, et al. Recellularization of well-preserved acellular kidney scaffold using embryonic stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2014;20(9–10):1486–98. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Caralt M, et al. Optimization and critical evaluation of decellularization strategies to develop renal extracellular matrix scaffolds as biological templates for organ engineering and transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2015;15(1):64–75. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Uygun BE, et al. Organ reengineering through development of a transplantable recellularized liver graft using decellularized liver matrix. Nat Med. 2010;16(7):814–820. doi: 10.1038/nm.2170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Goh SK, et al. Perfusion-decellularized pancreas as a natural 3D scaffold for pancreatic tissue and whole organ engineering. Biomaterials. 2013;34(28):6760–72. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Claudius Conrad M, PhD, Schuetz Christian, MD, Clippinger Benjamin, MS, Vacanti Joseph P, MD, FACS, Markmann James F, MD PhD, Ott Harald C., MD Bio-engineered endocrine pancreas based on decellularized pancreatic matrix and mesenchymal stem cell/islet cell coculture. 2010 [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hill RC, et al. Quantification of Extracellular Matrix Proteins from a Rat Lung Scaffold to Provide a Molecular Readout for Tissue Engineering. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015 doi: 10.1074/mcp.M114.045260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES