Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Chemosens Percept. 2015 May 9;8(3):112–116. doi: 10.1007/s12078-015-9179-6

Shifting human salty taste preference: Potential opportunities and challenges in reducing dietary salt intake of Americans

Nuala Bobowski 1
PMCID: PMC4593321  NIHMSID: NIHMS688915  PMID: 26451233

Abstract

Dietary salt reduction of Americans has been a focus of public health initiatives for more than 40 years primarily due to the association between high salt intake and development of hypertension. Despite past efforts, salt intake of Americans has remained at levels well above dietary recommendations, likely due in part to the hedonic appeal of salty taste. As such, in 2010 the Institute of Medicine suggested a strategy of gradual salt reduction of processed foods, the primary source of Americans’ dietary salt intake, via an approach intended to minimize impact on consumer acceptability of lower-sodium foods. This brief review discusses the ontogeny and development of human salt taste preference, the role of experience in shifting salt preference, and sources of dietary salt. Our current understanding of shifting human salt taste preference is discussed within the context of potential opportunities for success in reducing dietary salt, and gaps in the research that both limit our ability to predict effectiveness of gradual salt reduction and that need be addressed before a strategy to shift salt preference can realistically be implemented.

Keywords: Salt reduction, sodium, taste, preference

Introduction

Dietary salt reduction of Americans has been a focus of public health initiatives for more than 40 years, primarily due to the role of sodium in development of hypertension and related negative health outcomes (Institute of Medicine 2010a). Despite well-intentioned efforts of the past that have largely relied on modifying consumer behavior, including nutrition labeling and education on the health risks associated with a high salt diet, salt intake of Americans remains at levels well in excess of dietary recommendations—estimated sodium intake of both children and adults is greater than 3,000 mg per day, more than twice that of recommended daily intake levels (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2012). For this reason, a 14-member committee was convened by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 2008 to recommend strategies to reduce salt intake of Americans to levels consistent with Dietary Guidelines (≤ 2,300 mg per day) (United States Department of Agriculture 2010). The result was the 2010 publication, Strategies to Reduce Dietary Sodium in the United States, in which the committee recommended mandatory reduction of salt in processed foods, the primary contributor to Americans’ dietary salt intake (Mattes 1990; Mattes and Donnelly 1991), via a strategy of gradual stepwise reductions that would allow the population to adapt to an increasingly less salty food supply, without impacting acceptance of lower-sodium foods. The IOM suggests that in placing the responsibility on the food industry to reduce salt of products before point of purchase, the burden on the consumer to reduce one’s own dietary salt intake would be lifted (Institute of Medicine 2010a).

Most preferred level of salt is largely influenced by dietary salt intake; that is, individuals on high sodium diets tend to prefer higher levels of salt (Bertino et al. 1986; Huggins et al. 1992), and individuals on low sodium diets tend to prefer lower levels of salt (Bertino et al. 1982; Blais et al. 1986; Elmer 1988). Though the IOM’s suggested strategy is broadly based on this tenet—that reductions of salt in the food environment should naturally be followed by reductions in salt preference over time—their assumption has never been tested directly; as such, further research is required before a successful strategy can realistically be implemented. This brief review discusses the ontogeny and development of human salt taste preference, the role of experience in shifting salt preference, and sources of dietary salt. Our current understanding of shifting human salt taste preference is discussed within the context of potential opportunities for success in reducing dietary salt, and gaps in the research that limit our ability to predict effectiveness of a strategy aimed at reducing liking for an ingredient with powerful hedonic appeal.

Ontogeny and development of salt taste preference

Infants are indifferent to salty taste at birth, but demonstrate an increased preference for saline solutions over water at 4 months of age (Desor et al. 1975), a shift thought to be the result of postnatal development of salt taste receptors (Beauchamp et al. 1986). Though this shift appears to be largely unlearned, additional evidence suggests exposure to salt during this sensitive period may play a role. For example, adult offspring of mothers who experienced severe morning sickness during pregnancy, and therefore probable short-lived sodium depletion during pregnancy, had greater liking for salt than offspring whose mothers experienced little to no morning sickness (Crystal and Bernstein 1995). Similarly, infants exposed to a chloride-deficient formula had heightened preference for salt during adolescence (chloride deficiency is similar to sodium deficiency in terms of hormonal consequences and is thought to exert the same effects on salt taste preference) (Stein et al. 1996). In a separate study, infants exposed to starchy foods that typically contain sodium between 2 to 6 months of age showed increased acceptance for salty taste at 3 to 4 years, including an increased prevalence of behaviors such as licking salt from the surface of foods (Stein et al. 2012).

Beginning at around 4 years of age, children’s salt preference is significantly heightened relative to that of adults; in other words, children prefer significantly greater concentrations of salt in both solutions and foods (Beauchamp and Cowart 1990; Mennella et al. 2014). Though the reasons for this age-related difference are not well understood, recent findings suggest the difference may be driven in part by basic biology. In a study of 5 to 10-year-old children, those with a higher percent body fat (a marker of accelerated maturation) preferred a saltier-tasting broth; in addition, salt preference was positively associated with a urinary biomarker for bone growth (Mennella, Finkbeiner et al. 2014). Most preferred level of salt eventually decreases to be similar to that of adults around mid-adolescence (Desor et al. 1975), though the reason for this shift remains unresolved.

The role of dietary experience in establishing salt preference

Salt preferences in adulthood are largely determined by dietary intake of salt. In a landmark study, adult subjects were placed on self-maintained low-sodium diets for a 5-month period. Subjects rated saltiness intensity and pleasantness of saline solutions, soups, and crackers at varying salt concentrations before and during the diet period. Perceived saltiness intensity of crackers increased, and salt concentrations required for optimal pleasantness decreased in both soup and crackers during the diet period, with significant changes in preference first appearing after 2 months. A control group, whose dietary salt was unrestricted during the same 5-month period, experienced no changes in either perceived saltiness intensity or salt preference in solutions and foods (Bertino, Beauchamp et al. 1982). Findings from two similar longitudinal studies were consistent with these results. Subjects on 12-month low-sodium diets experienced a progressive, steady decline in preferred salt concentration in soup, from 0.76 to 0.33% sodium chloride (a 54% difference) at week 24 relative to study baseline. Subjects who did not reduce dietary salt intake did not experience the same shift in salt preference (Blais, Pangborn et al. 1986). In a separate 12-month study, subjects on low-sodium diets had a decreased preference for salt in crackers beginning 3 months after study baseline, and had increased saltiness intensity ratings at the end of the trial; again, control subjects experienced no change in salt preference (Elmer 1988). This association between dietary salt intake and salt preference is further supported by studies demonstrating an increase in most preferred level of salt in foods following increases in salt consumption (Bertino, Beauchamp et al. 1986; Huggins, Di Nicolantonio et al. 1992).

Experience with the taste of a single low sodium food through repeated exposure has been demonstrated to shift hedonic responses to salt, though research to date is limited. In one study, subjects were randomized to one of three groups: a control group that received a 20 ml sample of soup with a salt content similar to a commercially available product, a group that received a 20 ml sample of a no-salt-added soup, or a group that received a 280 ml serving of the no-salt-added soup. Subjects’ perceived saltiness intensity, liking, and familiarity of six soups with varying salt concentrations was assessed at a pre-study taste test. This was followed by a period of eight repeated exposures to assigned soups presented in approximately daily intervals, and a post-study taste test identical to the pre-study test. Subjects who received the no-salt-added soup during the exposure period showed increased liking for the soup after three exposures and liked the soup no less than an initially preferred saltier soup at the post-study taste test regardless of sample size received (20 vs. 280 ml), indicating mere repeated exposure to the low-sodium soup was sufficient to shift liking (Methven 2012). In a separate study designed to compare two salt reduction strategies over a 16-week period, subjects were randomized to an abrupt or gradual salt reduction group. All subjects consumed the same high sodium tomato juice for the first 3 weeks of the study (640 mg sodium per 237 ml serving). The abrupt salt reduction group received juice abruptly reduced in salt to a low-sodium target at week 4 (136 mg/serving), and the gradual salt reduction group received juice gradually reduced in salt by weekly 12% decrements, a difference that should have been unnoticeable from week to week (Bobowski and Vickers 2012), to reach the same low-sodium target at week 14. Liking for juice was assessed 3 times weekly over the 16-week period, and in addition, liking for juices of varying salt concentrations was assessed at pre- and post-study taste tests. Regardless of salt reduction strategy, liking for low-sodium juice increased significantly over the course of the exposure period (Bobowski et al. 2015), and a significant percentage of subjects preferred a tomato juice with a lower salt content at the post- relative to the pre-study taste test (Bobowski et al. 2015). These findings suggest it may be possible to reduce most-preferred level of salt in a single food with repeated exposure.

Shifts in salt preference are thought to occur as a result of adaptation to what eventually becomes familiar. Though there is some variation across studies in length of time required to reduce salt preference following a decrease in overall dietary salt intake, findings generally suggest that at least several weeks are needed. Once subjects are habituated to a diet composed of foods low in salt, foods with higher concentrations of salt are perceived as more intense and therefore less pleasant; that is, the low salt diet becomes the context from which higher salt foods are judged (Bertino, Beauchamp et al. 1982; Blais, Pangborn et al. 1986). The opposite is true of acceptance of low sodium foods within the context of higher salt diets, which may explain in part why adherence to a low sodium diet is initially difficult for most. A similar mechanism is thought to drive increases in liking for low sodium foods without changes made to overall salt intake. Assuming most preferred level of salt in a food is developed within the context of the salt level most often consumed, repeated exposure to the same food with a reduced salt content may result in ‘relearning’ a new appropriate level of saltiness through increased familiarity, which in turn, increases acceptability (Methven 2012).

Sources of dietary salt

Salt is integral to food manufacturing—as a processing aid; for its preservative and antimicrobial properties; and for imparting saltiness, enhancing flavor, and suppressing bitterness (Breslin and Beauchamp 1997). Salt added during processing contributes more than 75% to Americans’ total dietary salt intake (Mattes and Donnelly 1991). According to NHANES data, breads and rolls are the primary source of dietary sodium, followed by cured meats, and pizza, among both children and adults (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2012).

Discretionary salt use is a minimal contributor to overall dietary salt, estimated at between 2 (Witschi et al. 1985; Sowers and Stumbo 1986; Beauchamp et al. 1987) and 10% (Mattes 1990) of total intake, with an estimated 15% of Americans regularly adding salt to food without tasting (Newson et al. 2013). Despite the ubiquity of salt shakers in homes and restaurants, findings generally suggest the majority of consumers will not overcompensate for reduced-salt content of foods with an increase in discretionary salt use (Liem et al. 2012). In one study, subjects were placed on low sodium diets and given pre-weighed salt shakers to use ad libitum. Relative to pre- and post-diet periods, salt shaker use increased among subjects while on low sodium diets; however, after a 50% reduction in dietary salt intake, salt added back to foods with shakers accounted for only 20% of the deficit (Beauchamp, Bertino et al. 1987). Importantly, subjects in this study had no changes in salt taste preference while on low sodium diets relative to pre- and post-diet periods, a finding inconsistent with previous studies. Researchers hypothesized the reason for this difference was preservation of sensory experience with salty taste through addition of salt on rather than in foods. Despite significant reductions in total salt intake, shifts in preference may not occur without diminished sensory experiences with salty taste.

Shifting human salty taste preference: Research needs

The experts convened by the IOM to contribute to Strategies to Reduce Sodium Intake in the United States outlined a series of recommendations to reduce population salt intake that would involve government agencies, the food industry, and public health and consumer organizations; the most notable of these recommendations was gradual reduction of salt in processed foods in a stepwise fashion. In making this recommendation, the IOM committee indicated a number of areas in which research on salt reduction is lacking including what the time course of shifts in salt preference might be following gradual salt reduction, and whether exposure to higher salt foods might interrupt consumer adaptation to a food supply reduced in salt over time. Though progress has been made in the past few years in terms of support for salt reduction—for example, adoption of voluntary salt reduction targets by some food processors, and development of the National Salt Reduction Initiative, a partnership between city and state health departments to coordinate voluntary reduction of salt in packaged and restaurant foods by private companies (Institute of Medicine 2010b)—several important issues should be addressed before effectiveness of strategies for shifting salt preference and intake is determined.

First, whether children’s salt preference can be shifted remains unknown. Numerous trials have evaluated the effects of dietary salt reduction on blood pressure among children (He and MacGregor 2006); however, none have assessed the impact of salt reduction on children’s salt preference, an age group that prefers higher concentrations of salt than do adults. For children, how a food ‘should’ taste develops in a context-specific manner beginning at a young age; repeated exposure, building on the familiar, is one of the mechanisms by which children learn (Birch 1999). Though the initial liking for salty taste most likely has innate components, which foods should taste salty and how salty they should taste is learned. Sullivan and Birch’s innovative study of 4- to 5-year-old children demonstrated that those repeatedly exposed to salted tofu (a novel food) preferred that version over both plain and sweetened tofu in a post-exposure taste test; the children that learned to associate saltiness with tofu found that particular preparation familiar, appropriate, and therefore acceptable (Sullivan and Birch 1990). Within our current dietary environment replete with foods high in salt, this associative learning may be detrimental, as early familiarization may establish preferences that guide intake of salty foods throughout the lifespan (Birch and Anzman-Frasca 2011). By applying what is known about how preferences are formed, however, liking for low-sodium foods may be promoted through learning via early introduction and repeated exposure, though research is necessary to explore this hypothesis. Until reduction of children’s salt preference is examined further, the predicted effectiveness of a population salt reduction strategy cannot realistically include pediatric populations.

Second, though sodium is required by the body in small amounts for nerve conductance and fluid balance, why humans desire and consume salt in the absence of biological need is unknown (Schulkin 1991). Intake of sodium-rich processed foods is likely a contributing factor, however, there are at least two considerations that detract from this explanation: 1) salt intake is relatively consistent across cultures including those with a lower processed food intake than Americans (Intersalt Cooperative Research Group 1988), and 2) there is no data on salt intake prior to the 1950’s that might suggest an increase in dietary salt occurred with an increase in consumption of processed foods (Bernstein and Willett 2010; McCarron et al. 2010). In fact, McCarron et. al (2010) have suggested that our current salt intakes are in line with biological requirements, citing sodium reabsorption by the kidneys when intakes fall below 2,760 mg of sodium per day; according to the authors, current dietary recommendations for salt intake are tantamount to ignoring the basic biology of the human. Taken together, there may be other as of yet unresolved reasons for our current salt intakes that could potentially negate a focus on reducing salt added to foods during manufacturing (DeSimone et al. 2013).

Third, reducing sodium intake of a population to no more than 2,300 mg per day has not as of yet been accomplished. Through national education programs and government intervention, both Finland and the United Kingdom (UK) have seen considerable reductions in dietary salt intake of consumers (He and MacGregor 2009); however, it is important to consider both nations within the context of salt intake among Americans to fairly assess potential success of dietary salt reduction in the US. In Finland, a considerable proportion of the reported reduction in salt intake was due to a reduction of salt added to foods at home by consumers (Institute of Medicine 2010a); in the US, discretionary salt is a trivial source of dietary sodium (Beauchamp, Bertino et al. 1987; Mattes 1990). In the UK, the reported salt reduction of 20–30% in most processed foods as of 2009 (He and MacGregor 2009) is within the range typically found to have little impact on acceptability (Janewyatt 1983; Schroeder et al. 1988; Girgis et al. 2003; Malherbe et al. 2003), making it impossible to predict the impact of further salt reductions on food liking and intake. By last estimates of salt intake in both Finland and the UK, salt reduction efforts have resulted in reducing population dietary salt intake to a level approximately equivalent with Americans’ current intake (about 3,200 mg/day in Finland as of 2002 and the UK as of 2011) (He and MacGregor 2009; Institute of Medicine 2010a; Department of Health 2011); in other words, reducing dietary salt beyond this level is essentially ‘uncharted territory’. As of yet, there is no evidence to suggest that gradual salt reduction might be effective for lowering dietary salt intake further, to levels that could have a significant impact on food palatability.

Our current knowledge of shifting salt preference thus far suggests a strategy focused on reducing salt in processed foods has potential for success due to the strong association between salt intake and preference. However, in light of a paucity of data and a need for continued research, including a randomized controlled trial focused on the IOM’s proposed strategy, it may be imprudent to extrapolate from existing relatively short terms studies to conclude that gradually reducing salt in the food supply would be effective for both reducing salt intake and salt preference of an entire population.

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to acknowledge support from NIH-NIDCD Postdoctoral Training Grant 5T32DC0014.

References

  1. Beauchamp GK, Bertino M, Engelman K. Failure to compensate decreased dietary sodium with increased table salt usage. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1987;258(22):3275–3278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beauchamp GK, Cowart BJ. Preference for high salt concentrations among children. Developmental Psychology. 1990;26(4):539–545. [Google Scholar]
  3. Beauchamp GK, Cowart BJ, Moran M. Developmental changes in salt acceptability in human infants. Developmental Psychobiology. 1986;19(1):17–25. doi: 10.1002/dev.420190103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernstein AM, Willett WC. Trends in 24-h urinary sodium excretion in the United States, 1957–2003: a systematic review. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2010;92(5):1172–1180. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bertino M, Beauchamp GK, Engelman K. Long-term reduction in dietary sodium alters the taste of salt. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1982;36(6):1134–1144. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/36.6.1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bertino M, Beauchamp GK, Engelman K. Increasing dietary salt alters salt taste preference. Physiology and Behavior. 1986;38(2):203–213. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(86)90155-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Birch LL. Development of food preferences. Annual Review of Nutrition. 1999;19(1):41–62. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.19.1.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Birch LL, Anzman-Frasca S. Learning to prefer the familiar in obesogenic environments. Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series Paediatric programme. 2011;68:187–199. doi: 10.1159/000325856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blais CA, Pangborn RM, Borhani NO, Ferrell MF, Prineas RJ, et al. Effect of dietary sodium restriction on taste responses to sodium chloride: a longitudinal study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1986;44(2):232–243. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/44.2.232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bobowski N, Rendahl A, Vickers Z. A longitudinal comparison of two salt reduction strategies: acceptability of a low sodium food depends on the consumer. Food Quality and Preference. 2015;40(Part B):270–278. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bobowski N, Rendahl A, Vickers Z. Preference for salt in a food may be alterable without a low sodium diet. Food Quality and Preference. 2015;39:40–45. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bobowski N, Vickers Z. Determining sequential difference thresholds for sodium chloride reduction. Journal of Sensory Studies. 2012;27(3):168–175. [Google Scholar]
  13. Breslin PA, Beauchamp GK. Salt enhances flavour by suppressing bitterness. Nature. 1997;387(6633):563. doi: 10.1038/42388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Centers for Disease Control Prevention . Vital signs: food categories contributing the most to sodium consumption - United States, 2007–2008. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2012;61(5):92–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Crystal SR, Bernstein IL. Morning sickness: impact on offspring salt preference. Appetite. 1995;25(3):231–240. doi: 10.1006/appe.1995.0058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Department of Health. Assessment of Dietary Sodium Levels among Adults (aged 19–64) in England. 2011 Retrieved January 2, 2015, from http://transparency.dh.gov.uk/2012/06/21/sodium-levels-among-adults/
  17. DeSimone JA, Beauchamp GK, Drewnowski A, Johnson GH. Sodium in the food supply: challenges and opportunities. Nutrition Reviews. 2013;71(1):52–59. doi: 10.1111/nure.12006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Desor JA, Greene LS, Maller O. Preferences for sweet and salty in 9- to 15-year-old and adult humans. Science. 1975;190(4215):686–687. doi: 10.1126/science.1188365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Desor JA, Maller O, Andrews K. Ingestive responses of human newborns to salty, sour, and bitter stimuli. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 1975;89(8):966–970. doi: 10.1037/h0077171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Elmer PJ. PhD. University of Minnesota; 1988. The effect of dietary sodium reduction and potassium chloride supplementation on sodium chloride taste perceptions in mild hypertensives. [Google Scholar]
  21. Girgis S, Neal B, Prescott J, Prendergast J, Dumbrell S, et al. A one-quarter reduction in the salt content of bread can be made without detection. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2003;57(4):616–620. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. He FJ, MacGregor GA. Importance of salt in determining blood pressure in children: meta-analysis of controlled trials. Hypertension. 2006;48(5):861–869. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000245672.27270.4a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. He FJ, MacGregor GA. A comprehensive review on salt and health and current experience of worldwide salt reduction programmes. Journal of Human Hypertension. 2009;23(6):363–384. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2008.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Huggins RL, Di Nicolantonio R, Morgan TO. Preferred salt levels and salt taste acuity in human subjects after ingestion of untasted salt. Appetite. 1992;18(2):111–119. doi: 10.1016/0195-6663(92)90188-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Institute of Medicine. Strategies to Reduce Sodium Intake in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2010a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Institute of Medicine. Appendix G, National Salt Reduction Initiative Coordinated by the New York City Health Department. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2010b. Strategies to Reduce Sodium Intake in the United States. [Google Scholar]
  27. Intersalt Cooperative Research Group. Intersalt: an international study of electrolyte excretion and blood pressure. Results for 24 hour urinary sodium and potassium excretion. British Medical Journal. 1988;297(6644):319–328. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6644.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Janewyatt C. Acceptability of reduced sodium in breads, cottage cheese, and pickles. Journal of Food Science. 1983;48(4):1300–1302. [Google Scholar]
  29. Liem DG, Miremadi F, Zandstra EH, Keast RS. Health labelling can influence taste perception and use of table salt for reduced-sodium products. Public health nutrition. 2012;15(12):2340–2347. doi: 10.1017/S136898001200064X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Malherbe M, Walsh CM, van der Merwe CA. Consumer acceptability and salt perception of food with a reduced sodium content. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education. 2003;31(1):12–20. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mattes RD. Discretionary salt and compliance with reduced sodium diet. Nutrition Research. 1990;10(12):1337–1352. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mattes RD, Donnelly D. Relative contributions of dietary sodium sources. Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 1991;10(4):383–393. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1991.10718167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. McCarron DA, Drueke TB, Stricker EM. Science trumps politics: urinary sodium data challenge US dietary sodium guideline. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2010;92(5):1005–1006. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.002709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mennella JA, Finkbeiner S, Lipchock SV, Hwang LD, Reed DR. Preferences for salty and sweet tastes are elevated and related to each other during childhood. PLoS One. 2014;9:e92201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Methven L, Langreney E, Prescott J. Changes in liking for a no added salt soup as a function of exposure. Food Quality and Preference. 2012;26(2):135–140. [Google Scholar]
  36. Newson RS, Elmadfa I, Biro G, Cheng Y, Prakash V, et al. Barriers for progress in salt reduction in the general population. An international study. Appetite. 2013;71:22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schroeder CL, Bodyfelt FW, Wyatt CJ, McDaniel MR. Reduction of sodium chloride in Cheddar cheese: Effect on sensory, microbiological, and chemical properties. Journal of Dairy Science. 1988;71(8):117–159. [Google Scholar]
  38. Schulkin J. The allure of salt. Psychobiology. 1991;19:116–121. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sowers M, Stumbo P. A method to assess sodium intake in populations. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 1986;86(9):1196–1202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Stein LJ, Cowart BJ, Beauchamp GK. The development of salty taste acceptance is related to dietary experience in human infants: a prospective study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2012;95(1):123–129. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.014282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Stein LJ, Cowart BJ, Epstein AN, Pilot LJ, Laskin CR, et al. Increased liking for salty foods in adolescents exposed during infancy to a chloride-deficient feeding formula. Appetite. 1996;27(1):65–77. doi: 10.1006/appe.1996.0034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sullivan SA, Birch LL. Pass the sugar, pass, the salt: experience dictates preference. Developmental Psychology. 1990;26(4):546–551. [Google Scholar]
  43. United States Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Washington D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  44. Witschi JC, Ellison RC, Doane DD, Vorkink GL, Slack WV, et al. Dietary sodium reduction among students: feasibility and acceptance. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 1985;85(7):816–821. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES