Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1982 Jun;37(6):457–461. doi: 10.1136/thx.37.6.457

Cytological sampling at fibreoptic bronchoscopy: comparison of catheter aspirates and brush biopsies.

M F Muers, M M Boddington, M Cole, D Murphy, A I Spriggs
PMCID: PMC459341  PMID: 7135281

Abstract

A prospective study was undertaken to compare bronchial brushings with dry catheter aspiration for the cytological diagnosis of lung cancer at fibreoptic bronchoscopy. Duplicate samples taken by aspirate and brush were obtained at 103 consecutive routine bronchoscopies. Aspirate and brush samples were reported on separately by two cytologists. At the end of the study a 30% sample, including the 19 cases with different findings by the two methods, were subjected to a blind crossover review, and then an open review. Forceps biopsy specimens for routine histological assessment were taken in 94 cases (92%). Ninety-eight of 103 (95%) aspirates and 99 of 103 (96%) brush specimens were technically satisfactory. Carcinoma was diagnosed at bronchoscopy on cytological or histological evidence or both in 57 cases. Fifty-five of these tumours (96%) were recognised by either the aspirate or the brush method, 52 (91%) by brush, and 50 (88%) by aspirate. Thirty-four cases (60%) could be diagnosed from histological specimens. The order of cytological sampling did not systematically affect yield. It is concluded that fine-catheter aspirates, permitting smears to be prepared in the laboratory, are a satisfactory alternative to brush smears for the cytological diagnosis of lung cancer at bronchoscopy. The routine use of both techniques at bronchoscopy will increase diagnostic yield by about 5%. Duplicate sampling may be especially useful in obtaining diagnostic material from upper-lobe or apical-segment tumours.

Full text

PDF
457

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buirski G., Calverley P. M., Douglas N. J., Lamb D., McIntyre M., Sudlow M. F., White H. Bronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of bronchial carcinoma. Thorax. 1981 Jul;36(7):508–511. doi: 10.1136/thx.36.7.508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chopra S. K., Genovesi M. G., Simmons D. H., Gothe B. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer comparison of pre-and post-bronchoscopy sputa, washings, bruchings and biopsies. Acta Cytol. 1977 Jul-Aug;21(4):524–527. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cole M. J., Cowie J., Spriggs A. I. Disposable polythene catheter; an alternative to the brochial brushing method for cytology of bronchial secretions obtained with the fibreoptic bronchoscope. J Clin Pathol. 1978 Sep;31(9):907–908. doi: 10.1136/jcp.31.9.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Funahashi A., Browne T. K., Houser W. C., Hranicka L. J. Diagnostic value of bronchial aspirate and postbronchoscopic sputum in fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest. 1979 Nov;76(5):514–517. doi: 10.1378/chest.76.5.514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ikeda S., Yanai N., Ishikawa S. Flexible bronchofiberscope. Keio J Med. 1968 Mar;17(1):1–16. doi: 10.2302/kjm.17.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kvale P. A., Bode F. R., Kini S. Diagnostic accuracy in lung cancer; comparison of techniques used in association with flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest. 1976 Jun;69(6):752–757. doi: 10.1378/chest.69.6.752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lyall J. R., Summers G. D., O'Brien I. M., Batemen N. T., Pike C. P., Braimbridge M. V. Sequential brush biopsy and conventional biopsy: direct comparison of diagnostic sensitivity in lung malignancy. Thorax. 1980 Dec;35(12):929–931. doi: 10.1136/thx.35.12.929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mitchell D. M., Emerson C. J., Collyer J., Collins J. V. Fibreoptic bronchoscopy: ten years on. Br Med J. 1980 Aug 2;281(6236):360–363. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6236.360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Payne C. R., Stovin P. G., Barker V., McVittie S., Stark J. E. Diagnostic accuracy of cytology and biopsy in primary bronchial carcinoma. Thorax. 1979 Jun;34(3):294–299. doi: 10.1136/thx.34.3.294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Richardson R. H., Zavala D. C., Mukerjee P. K., Bedell G. N. The use of fiberoptic bronchoscopy and brush biopsy in the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary malignancy. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1974 Jan;109(1):63–66. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1974.109.1.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Solomon D. A., Solliday N. H., Gracey D. R. Cytology in fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Comparison of bronchial brushing, washing and post-bronchoscopy sputum. Chest. 1974 Jun;65(6):616–619. doi: 10.1378/chest.65.6.616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tobin J. O., Beare J., Dunnill M. S., Fisher-Hoch S., French M., Mitchell R. G., Morris P. J., Muers M. F. Legionnaires' disease in a transplant unit: isolation of the causative agent from shower baths. Lancet. 1980 Jul 19;2(8186):118–121. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)90005-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zavala D. C. Diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy: Techniques and results of biopsy in 600 patients. Chest. 1975 Jul;68(1):12–19. doi: 10.1378/chest.68.1.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES