Synopsis
Younger age at menarche—on its own and through interaction with lower education—significantly increases risk of child marriage among girls in rural Maharashtra, India.
Keywords: Age at menarche, Child marriage, Girls’ education, India
India is home to 33% of the 720 million women worldwide who were married before the age of 18 years [1]. Menarche has historically been viewed as an indicator of a girl’s readiness to marry [2], but recent research on this issue is limited. The present study examined associations between age at menarche and age at marriage among young wives who were baseline respondents in the CHARM study—a two-armed randomized controlled trial evaluating a male engagement-focused family planning intervention in rural Maharashtra, India.
Between March and December 2012, 1062 wives of men aged 18–30 years provided written consent and survey data on age at marriage (≤15, 16–17, or ≥18 years), age at menarche (8–12, 12.1–13, 13.1–14, or 14.1–18 years), demographics (age, tribal status, husband’s age, and level of education), and premarital gendered risks (paternal spousal violence against mother and non-consultation in choice of marital partner). Institutional review board approval was granted by the National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health (Mumbai, India) and the University of California, San Diego (San Diego, CA, USA). Multinomial regressions were used to assess the hypothesized association, adjusting for demographics and gendered risks, using SPSS version 22 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). P<0.05 was deemed statistically significant.
Participants were aged 11–27 years at marriage (mean 18.62 ± 2.25 years); 332 (31.2%) married before the age of 18 years. Husbands were aged 11–30 years at marriage (mean 22.26 ± 2.87); 34 (3.2%) husbands had married before the age of 18 years. Mean age at menarche was 13.7 ± 1.3 years.
Younger age at menarche was associated with marriage before the age of 18 years (Table 1). Post hoc analysis documented a significant interaction between age at menarche and education (P<0.001), such that there is greatest risk for early marriage in the context of earlier menarche and lower education level (Supplementary Material S1).
Table 1.
Total (n=1062)a |
Age at marriage, ya | ≤15 y at marriageb | 16–17 y at marriageb | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
≤15 (n=60) | 16–17 (n=272) |
≥18 (n=732) | OR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) |
OR (95% CI) |
AOR (95% CI) |
||
Age, yc | 22.49 ± 2.48 (17–30) |
22.13 ± 2.3 3(18–27) |
21.77 ± 2.4 3(17–28) |
22.79 ± 2.45 (18–30) |
0.89 (0.80– 1.00)d |
0.74 (0.62– 0.88)e |
0.84 (0.79– 0.89)e |
0.76 (0.69– 0.83)e |
Husband’s age, yc | 26.12 ± 2.67 (18–30) |
25.85 ± 2.6 9(20–30) |
25.52 ± 2.7 4(20–30) |
26.36 ± 2.60 (18–30) |
0.93 (0.84– 1.03) |
1.21 (1.03– 1.42)d |
0.89 (0.84– 0.94)f |
1.12 (1.03– 1.22)f |
Tribal population | ||||||||
Yes | 724 (68.2) | 49 (81.7) | 221 (81.3) | 454 (62.2) | 2.71 (1.39– 5.30)f |
1.18 (0.55– 2.56) |
2.63 (1.30– 3.24)e |
1.38 (0.93– 2.04) |
No | 338 (31.8) | 11 (18.3) | 51 (18.7) | 276 (37.8) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Education | ||||||||
None | 201 (18.9) | 30 (50.0) | 83 (30.5) | 88 (12.1) | 47.39 (11.10– 45.27)e |
56.02 (12.08– 259.76)e |
9.36 (5.73– 15.30)e |
10.24 (5.89– 17.79)e |
Some | 553 (52.1) | 28 (46.7) | 161 (59.2) | 364 (49.9) | 10.69 (2.53– 45.27)e |
9.12 (2.05– 40.57)f |
4.39 (2.86– 6.76)e |
3.97 (2.48– 6.35)e |
Completed secondary or higher |
29.0 (308) | 2 (3.3) | 28 (10.3) | 278 (38.1) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Age at menarche, y | ||||||||
8–12 | 172 (16.2) | 31.7 (19) | 50 (18.4) | 103 (14.1) | 5.56 (2.27– 13.65)e |
4.36 (1.68– 11.32)f |
2.05 (1.30– 3.24)f |
1.51 (0.92– 2.48) |
12.1–13 | 311 (29.3) | 45.0 (27) | 87 (32.0) | 197 (27.0) | 4.13 (1.76– 9.70)e |
4.00 (1.63– 9.82)f |
1.86 (1.25– 2.78)f |
1.58 (1.03– 2.42)d |
13.1–14 | 311 (29.3) | 11.7 (7) | 85 (31.3) | 219 (30.0) | 0.96 (0.33– 2.79) |
0.88 (0.29– 2.66) |
1.64 (1.10– 2.44)d |
1.49 (0.97– 2.29) |
≥14.1 | 268 (25.2) | 11.7 (7) | 50 (18.4) | 211 (28.9) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Parental interpersonal violence | ||||||||
Yes | 168 (15.8) | 17 (28.3) | 45 (16.5) | 106 (14.5) | 2.33 (1.28– 4.23)f |
2.40 (1.25– 4.63)f |
1.17 (0.80– 1.71) |
1.06 (0.70– 1.60) |
No | 894 (84.2) | 43 (71.7) | 227 (83.5) | 624 (85.5) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Not consulted in mate selection | ||||||||
Yes | 50 (4.7) | 6 (10.0) | 14 (5.1) | 30 (4.1) | 2.59 (1.03– 6.50)d |
2.87 (1.01– 8.15)d |
1.27 (0.66– 2.43) |
1.29 (0.64– 2.60) |
No | 1012 (95.3) | 54 (90.0) | 258 (94.9) | 700 (95.9) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; AOR, adjusted odds ratio.
Values are given as mean ± SD (range) or number (percentage).
Age ≥18 years used as a reference relative to the minor age at marriage category in multinomial analyses (e.g. participants who were not consulted in mate selection, relative to those who were consulted, were more likely to marry at <15 years rather than at ≥18 years).
Age variables are presented as means descriptively, but were used as continuous variables in regression.
P<0.05.
P<0.001.
P<0.01.
The limitations of the present study should be considered. The cross-sectional design precludes assumptions of causality; results are subject to recall and social desirability biases, and have limited generalizability.
In conclusion, the present study has shown that young age at menarche increases the risk of child marriage in Maharashtra. Similar results have been reported for rural Bangladesh [3]. Community education is needed in rural South Asia to communicate that menarche is an indicator of development, not readiness for marriage or healthy childbearing. Significant interaction effects found for age at menarche and education in predicting minor age at marriage also reinforce calls to support girls staying in school beyond menarche as a means of preventing girl child marriage [4]. Menstrual hygiene management programs in schools could be useful for this goal. The present study has also documented that girls from families characterized by paternal spousal violence and non-engagement of girls in spouse selection are most vulnerable to young age at marriage, highlighting the links across these gendered risks. Multigenerational gender-transformative interventions promoting female education and marital choice, and reducing spousal violence could be important to address child marriage in South Asia.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (Grant #BT/IN/US/01/BD/2010), and the United States National Institute of Health (Grant number: RO1HD61115) provided funding.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.United Nations Children’s Fund. [Accessed March 23, 2015];Ending child marriage: progress and prospects. http://www.unicef.org/media/files/Child_Marriage_Report_7_17_LR..pdf. Published July 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Banerjee K. Marriage change in rural India, 1921–1981. Hist Fam. 1998;3(1):63–94. doi: 10.1016/s1081-602x(99)80235-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Field E, Ambrus A. Early marriage, age of menarche, and female schooling attainment in Bangladesh. J Polit Econ. 2008;116(5):881–930. [Google Scholar]
- 4.United Nations Children’s Fund. [Accessed March 23, 2015];All Children in School by 2015: Global Initiative on out-of-School Children. South Asia Regional Study Covering Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. http://www.unicef.org/education/files/SouthAsia_OOSCI_Study__Executive_Summary_26Jan_14Final.pdf. Published January 2014. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.