Abstract
A long isoform of the human Epithelial Sodium Channel (ENaC) α subunit has been identified, but little data exist regarding the properties or regulation of channels formed by α728. The baseline whole cell conductance of oocytes expressing trimeric α728βγ channels was 898.1 ± 277.2 and 49.59 ± 13.2 µS in low and high sodium solutions, respectively, and was 11 and 2 fold higher than the conductances of α669βγ in same solutions. α728βγ channels were also 2 to 5 fold less sensitive to activation by the serine proteases subtilisin and trypsin than α669βγ in low and high Na+ conditions. The long isoform exhibited lower levels of full length and cleaved protein at the plasma membrane and a rightward shifted sensitivity to inhibition by increases of [Na+]i. Both channels displayed similar single channel conductances of 4 pS, and both were activated to a similar extent by reducing temperature, altogether indicating that activation of baseline conductance of α728βγ was likely mediated by enhanced channel activity or open probability. Expression of α728 in native kidneys was validated in human urinary exosomes. These data demonstrate that the long isoform of αENaC forms the structural basis of a channel with different activity and regulation, which may not be easily distinguishable in native tissue, but may underlie sodium hyperabsorption and salt sensitive differences in humans.
Keywords: alternative splicing, electrophysiology, epithelial sodium channel (ENaC), hypertension, ion channels, protease
Introduction
Background
Hypertension is a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke. One of the primary determinants of an individual's blood pressure is blood volume, which is chronically regulated by the kidneys. Reabsorption of water from the nephron lumen to the plasma is tied to the osmotic gradient created by the movement of sodium. The epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) is the final step in sodium reabsorption in the collecting duct of the nephron (CD) and the rate-limiting step in reabsorption in these epithelia.
High activity ENaC is a heteromultimer consisting of a structural subunit, typically α, as well as β and γ subunits with a membrane stoichiometry which electrophysiology indicates consists of 2 α subunits, one β and one γ,1 while structural homology to the crystalized acid sensing ion channel (ASIC),2,3 suggests a trimer of each subunit.
Modularity and alternate splicing
α ENaC is critical for channel formation.1,4 α-like subunits such as Xenopus epsilon,5 ASIC1,6 or human δ, can exhibit different properties and may substitute for α in some tissues yielding channels with different activity and/or regulation. In humans, a longer α isoform has been detected in the kidney but it remains incompletely characterized.7 We examined the properties of this 728 a.a isoform because little is known about its physiological function and regulation despite being first identified by Thomas et al. in 1998 where it was shown to have single channel conductance and macroscopic currents similar to those of the 669 a.a. isoform. It was also shown to be expressed in multiple tissues including colon, lung, and kidney,7 however, there are no detailed comparisons between channels formed with α728 and α669.
A significant part of ENaC regulation occurs through membrane trafficking/recycling leading to differences of membrane protein expression.8 Another major aspect of regulation occurs through changes to open probability mainly through proteolytic cleavage of the channel.9 The channel also responds to changes of intra and extracellular Na+ leading to downregulation in response to increases of [Na+].10,11 The response and regulation of α728 channel by [Na+] is undetermined and is examined in the current work.
Regulation by [Na+] and proteolysis
Two types of inhibition by sodium have been described and differentiated based on time course:12-14 a slow effect due to high [Na+], termed “feedback inhibition,” and mediated by PKC15 and a fast effect termed “self-inhibition” likely mediated by the Na+ ions interaction with the channel,11 and this represents an intrinsic channel property that does not require further second messenger.14 ENaC in native epithelia, and especially in the kidney, is exposed to different [Na+] making both regulatory processes physiologically relevant. Further, there is variation in the degree to which blood pressure is sensitive an individual's salt intake, and it is unknown if such differences could be, at least in part, mediated by differences in the structural isoform expressed (α669 vs α728).
Another regulator of channel activity is cleavage by internal and external proteases.9,16,17 This occurs on two ENaC subunits, with α being one of these subunits.9 Cleavage markedly increases open probability (Po) either by removal of an inhibitory tract,18 or loss of the first transmembrane domain.19 The baseline intracellular and exogenous extracellular cleavage of channels formed with α728 by proteases is unknown. Given the chronic exposure of ENaC to urinary proteases, differences in proteolytic activation of these subunits is of potential significance to renal sodium handling in the CD.
Effects of temperature
In addition to the above processes, ENaC is stimulated by membrane rigidification by cooling.20,21 This effect increases channel Po possibly by increased membrane order and rigidity and interaction with the lipid bilayer.20 This activation of Po is likely separate from that caused by cleavage, as it is immediate and reversible, and, it is unknown if the 2 human α isoforms exhibit similar responses to cooling.
We report that α728βγ forms a high activity channel despite low plasma membrane density of the full length and cleaved forms. This indicates that ENaC may be highly active in the absence of cleavage. Regulation by Na+ was also different with α728 channels exhibiting larger inhibition by chronic and acute high [Na+]i with sensitivity shifted to higher [Na+]. Effects of temperature were similar indicating that the interaction with the lipid bilayer was not likely modified. Altogether, these data indicate that α728 can form a high activity channel in vivo that is less dependent on proteolysis for its activity and is further stimulated in low [Na+]i, and that the existence of channels with this isoform may predispose collecting duct epithelia to Na+ retention.
Results
Structure and function
The structure and function of the α ENaC N-terminus remains largely unstudied despite being 1st identified by Thomas and colleagues in 1998.7 We examined the amino acid sequence of the extended α728 N-terminus with to the known α669 sequence and homology to rat. Figure 1A represents the alternative splice sites which give rise to the differences in the mRNA sequence between α669 and α728. The α728 transcript produces upstream an additional 59 amino acids from a longer first exon of α669 which also contains a unique 5′ UTR. Because the ASIC structure solved by Jasti et al.2 did not include the N-terminus there is no homologous structure to which this sequence can be compared to estimate a secondary structure.
We compared the human α728 sequence to that of rat α699 (Fig. 1B) because the rat N-terminus is longer than that of human α669 and because there are notable electrophysiological differences between rat and human ENaC especially in terms of voltage activation and sensitivity to Na+.22 The first 24 a.a. of the rat sequence are homologous to human α728 a.a 13-37, and these are absent from the human α669 sequence.
Rectification and voltage activation
Two of the characteristic electrophysiological properties of α669βγ are its current-voltage relationship which shows inward rectification (Fig. 2), and a voltage dependent activation possibly by voltage induced changes to [Na+] at the inner mouth of the channel.22 Rectification and voltage activation are in addition to Na+-self inhibition intrinsic channel properties and changes in them reflect differences in channel properties and function. We tested rectification and voltage activation of α728βγ to determine if the longer N-terminus led to differences in these properties.
Rectification of the α728βγ and α669βγ channels was assessed from the ratio of the slope conductances at −100 mV and +40 mV in ND94 recording solution. Conductance of α728βγ (Fig. 2) was more linear (1.68 ± 0.21) than α669βγ (5.47 ± 0.81) at hyperpolarizing voltages (Fig. 2D, P < 0.01).
Voltage dependent activation at −100 mV in α728βγ was apparently less than that observed in α669βγ. The observed activation in α728βγ was longer than the 500 ms measurement and for this reason it was not possible to determine a finite time constant or magnitude of activation (Fig. 2C). Therefore, we cannot rule out that the reduced activation is actually just due to a much longer time constant of activation of α728βγ. Given complications with Na+ loading in prolonged clamping to −100 mV, it was not possible to extend the time course of the measurement to accurately obtain a time constant. Nonetheless, these data indicate marked differences in the way these 2 channels respond to acute changes of voltage.
These differences of voltage activation and rectification led to a different characteristic I/V relationship for the 2 isoforms. Consistent with effects of Na+ and voltage on these parameters, we expect that these isoforms would also exhibit different responses to changes of [Na+].
Whole cell conductance
Thomas et al.7 reported similar macroscopic currents between α669βγ, and α728βγ. However, their experiments were designed to examine if channels containing α728 were largely similar to those containing α669. Recordings were also performed under high sodium conditions, which could miss some of the differences between these 2 isoforms by different [Na+]i. To further explore these differences, especially in light of differences in rectification and voltage activation, we tested the baseline activity of both isoforms under chronic conditions of high or low [Na+].
Incubation of ENaC expressing oocytes in low extracellular Na+ reduces [Na+]i from 65 mM to 12 mM. As seen in Figure 3A, α728βγ oocytes incubated in low Na+ had a baseline amiloride sensitive conductance (gNa) of 898.1 ± 277.2 μS (n = 13), while α669βγ injected oocytes had a baseline conductance of 49.59 ± 13.2 μS (n = 13). This 18 fold difference indicates marked differences in overall activity between the 2 constructs caused by the extended N-terminus.
Higher activity of α728βγ persisted in high Na+, however, prolonged incubation in the 96 mM Na+ solution lead to larger decrease of the gNa of α728βγ relative to that of α669βγ, which decreased to 81.1 ± 24.2 μS (n = 23) and 20.5 ± 5.1 μS (n = 24), respectively. Thus, high Na+ caused an additional 4.5 fold inhibition of α728βγ relative to α669βγ (11 vs 2.5 fold inhibition of α728βγ versus α669βγ). This indicates that α728βγ inhibition by increasing [Na+]i requires higher values which are greater than 12 mM and in the range of 65 mM; or that α669βγ is more sensitive to [Na+]i and is already inhibited to a larger extent than α728βγ in the range of 12 mM.
The activity of channels formed by α ENaC is heavily dependent on the co-expression of the β and γ subunits. To eliminate the possibility that α728 is capable of forming highly active channels alone or under different subunit combinations we expressed only α728 and in combination with γ in absence of the β subunit. On its own, the conductance of α728 was too low to be accurately measured and it displayed a current at −100 mV of 62.6 ± 9.9 nA (Fig. 3C). Channels formed with α728γ had an amiloride sensitive conductance of 2.2 ± 0.7 µS indicating that all 3 subunits are required for full activity and that the extended N-terminus does not change this requirement.
Activation by proteases
Proteolysis is a major regulatory mechanism for ENaC, having been observed in vivo and in vitro. This process is also known to be reproduced in the oocyte system. Because α728 has been detected in the kidney7 (see below), and because endogenous urinary serine proteases can cleave and activate α669βγ ENaC, we measured the proteolytic activation profiles of α669βγ and α728βγ. We examined 2 serine proteases-trypsin and subtilisin-which have been shown to activate α669βγ.17,19 As the data shown above suggested different responses to Na+ between isoforms, we tested the effects of these proteases under both high and low Na+ conditions.
A representative activation of α728βγ with 50 ng/ml trypsin in high [Na+] is shown in Figure 4A. Trypsin caused a 15 fold activation in a time course similar to that we previously described for α669βγ.9 In contrast, activation of channels formed with α728 and α728γ alone (Fig. 3B) were minimal and ~2 fold or less indicating that this process-just like in α669-required the presence of all 3 channel subunits.
In high [Na+] conditions subtilisin activated trimeric α669βγ by 6.9 ± 2.2 fold, and α728βγ by 2.0 ± 0.3 fold (Fig. 4C, P < 0.05). Activation in low [Na+] was 2.1 ± 0.4 fold for α669βγ and 1.3 ± 0.2 fold for α728βγ (Fig. 4D, P < 0.05). These data indicate interaction between [Na+]i and proteolytic activation-a likely effect on baseline channel open probability (Po). It also indicates that α728βγ in low [Na+]i is either nearly insensitive to proteolysis or that it is largely already cleaved by endogenous intracellular proteases. This was tested with a different protease.
Activation by trypsin followed a similar profile, but with larger magnitudes of activation. In high sodium trypsin activated α669βγ by 53.6 ± 19.6 fold, and α728βγ by 10.7 ± 2.7 fold (Fig. 4E, P < 0.05). In low sodium trypsin activated α669βγ by 9.5 ± 2.8 fold, and α728βγ by 2.9 ± 0.4 fold (Fig. 4F, P < 0.05). Thus, for both proteases activation of α728βγ was lower in low Na+ and less than that of α669βγ.
Protein expression and processing
In addition to intrinsic changes to channel function, changes in trafficking to or from the membrane and high membrane expression could explain the high activity seen in α728βγ. High endogenous cleavage could also explain the high baseline activity and low activation by external proteases. We tested both of these possibilities by biochemically examining channel plasma membrane expression and the magnitude of endogenous intracellular proteolytic processing. Given the marked differences in activation between high and low Na+ we examined these parameters under both [Na+]i conditions.
Western blot of oocytes expressing channels of either isoform in high or low sodium or α728 alone is shown in Figure 5. The longer α728 isoform in α728βγ channels migrated at 88.1 ± 2.2 kDa while α669 in α669βγ channels migrated at 81.6 ± 1.6 kDa. This is consistent with the presence of the additional 59 a.a. Both isoforms exhibited an endogenously cleaved form which migrated at 64.6 ± 1.8 and 60.9 ± 1.0 kDa, respectively.
The longer α728 isoform in trimeric channels exhibited low membrane and endogenous cleavage levels in both low and high Na+. In this example α728 also exhibited lower intracellular levels than α669 studied under the same conditions, although as shown in the summary below this was not consistently observed. This indicates much higher activity of α728βγ at the membrane despite lower cleavage and rules out that trimeric channel activation was due to enhanced expression or processing.
Monomeric α728 when injected at 10 fold higher cRNA levels could be observed at the plasma membrane; however, this also exhibited no evidence of endogenous cleavage. Interestingly, when cleaved as part of trimeric complex, α728 was consistently of higher M.W. than that of α669 (Fig. 5B) indicating the presence of different cleavage location or additional biochemical modification to account for this 4 kDa difference. Alternatively, this differences is consistent with the 26 amino acid fragment between the 2 putative furin cleavage sites, RSRR and RRAR (see Discussion).
Baseline expression and processing and effects of [Na+] are summarized in Figure 5C. Overall both isoforms exhibited much lower membrane than intracellular levels, especially given differences in loading equivalents between these fractions. Full length levels of α728βγ and α669βγ were similar in the intracellular fractions irrespective of the [Na+] ruling out increased protein expression as the explanation for α728βγ hyperactivity. Membrane full length and cleaved α728βγ were also lower than those for α669βγ and this was especially evident in high Na+. Thus, despite the 18 and 2.5 fold higher activity of α728βγ in low and high Na+, there were no comparable increases and in fact lower absolute levels of cleaved α728 than α669 indicating that the cleaved form is not the only one which supports high activity.
Examination of the proportion of cleaved α at the membrane (Fig. 6) indicates similar cleavage proportion between α728 and α669 despite the lower absolute levels of the cleaved form and the much higher whole cell currents in α728. This indicates that the additional 59 a.a. in α728 do not markedly affect overall cleavage efficiency per se, although a shift in cleavage preference cannot be ruled out. This also indicates that the reduced activation of α728 trimers with trypsin and subtilisin are likely due to saturation of Po of existing and likely high activity uncleaved channels.
Also notable in Figure 6 are the larger cleaved fractions of both isoforms in 96 mM than 9.6 mM Na+. These differences are opposite to the differences of [Na+] on activity and are consistent with a different mode of channel regulation by Na+ that is separate from that by cleavage (see Discussion and Fig. 12).
Detection in human urine
Although Thomas et al.7 detected α728 mRNA in human kidneys, the correlation between mRNA concentrations and steady state protein levels is not always strong.23 Moreover, the in vivo cleavage status of this protein was undetermined. As normal human tissue is not readily available for examining protein expression we isolated and examined various urinary fractions for the presence of α728 protein. We fractionated urine into organellar and exosomal fractions because exosomes contain plasma membrane bound proteins and this fraction is known to heavily contain aquaporin 2, a membrane protein along with ENaC present in the collecting duct (data not shown).24
We examined fractions corresponding to cell debris, large vesicles such as the Golgi apparatus, and exosomes. We used an α728 specific antibody. As shown in Figure 7 we detected full length protein which migrated at 87 kDa consistent with that expected from full length uncleaved α728. A second band at 27 kDa was detected in some subjects which was also competed with the immunizing peptide, and this likely represented the cleaved N-terminal fragment. No C-terminal fragment was detected as the recognized epitope is contained within the first 59 a.a. This indicates the presence of both full length and potentially cleaved α728 in human kidneys in vivo and also variable cleavage between subjects of this isoform by existing urinary proteases. Additional bands were also detected at less than 20 kDa in some participants (see Fig. 7). These fragments may be the products of further proteolytic processing when exosomes are exposed to further urinary proteases.
Cell attached recordings
For both isoforms incubation in high [Na+] increased the degree of activation by cleavage. Under both Na+ conditions α728βγ was also less sensitive to proteolytic activation but displayed higher baseline activity than α669βγ. We used single channel recordings to examine if these differences were due to differences in the single channel conductance or channel kinetics.
Cell attached patch clamp recordings of α728βγ are shown in Figure 8. Under high [Na+] the single channel conductance was 4.0 pS-similar to the single channel conductance of α669βγ.25,26 The single channel conductance in low [Na+] was 1.7 pS. Under both [Na+] open and close times were consistent with known values for α669βγ. These values are consistent with those of Thomas et al. in high Na+.7 There were also no marked differences in channel kinetics, however, a direct determination of channel open probability was limited by the slow nature of the ENaC kinetics and variable gating.27,28 These data along with the Western blot data above rule out that activation of α728βγ occurs by enhanced membrane density, enhanced single channel conductance, and indicate that activation must be by elimination due to effects on open probability.
Ideally, single channel measurements would provide evidence of differences in Po, however, too many channels were observed in all α728βγ patches and this required that we inject 5 fold less cRNA for the channel subunits, which further precluded an accurate assessment of this parameter. Also, such measurements would fail to show changes of Po if multiple open states are observed as we propose below in response to cleavage, sodium inhibition and changes of membrane order.
Temperature response
ENaC is activated by low temperature, most likely by increasing open probability following membrane rigidification.20,21 Given the time course and reversibility, this process represents a cleavage independent means of activating membrane resident channels. We examined the response of α728βγ channels to a temperature change in the range of 23°C to 10°C.
As shown in Figure 9, both isoforms exhibited similar effects of cooling and no significant differences were observed. A decrease from 23°C to 15°C increased the activity of α669βγ and α728βγ by 1.3 ± 0.2 and 1.4 ± 0.3 fold, respectively. At 10° C, and despite the drop of the single channel conductance 20,21, gNa remained at 1.0 ± 0.1 and 1.1 ± 0.3 that observed at 23°C for α669βγ and α728βγ. This indicates that activation by α728 is not due to differences in the way the channel interacts with the membrane and that this mode of activation is unaltered between the 2 isoforms.
Sodium inhibition
We find different effects of prolonged [Na+] changes on the baseline activity of these 2 α isoforms. Further, differences between the 2 isoforms in terms of rectification and voltage activation indicate variability in the acute effects of [Na+]i. Given the importance of acute regulation by Na+, we examined the effects of acute increases of [Na+]i by mechanical and electrical forces.
Mechanical loading allowed us to examine the acute effects of changing [Na+]i with initial changes occurring within 10s-within the time expected for diffusion from the injecting electrode to the oocyte membrane - and stable concentrations are observed within 2-4 minutes.14 Experiments were done in 2 groups of oocytes starting in low and high Na+ baselines. As shown in Figure 10A in high Na+ an increase of [Na+]i by 25 mM inhibited α669βγ by 83% of control, similar to that previously reported.14 The same increase in α728βγ caused an initial stimulation to 175% of control followed by inhibition to 42%. Accounting for the initial increase to 175%, similar magnitude of inhibition is observed in both α728βγ and α669βγ at the final [Na+]i of ∼90 mM (175% to 42% vs. 100% to 17%).
The differences in the initial response likely indicate that α728βγ required that higher [Na+]i are achieved prior to inhibition, and that this channel goes through an intermediate concentration near 65 mM where activation of the single channel current by increasing [Na+]i dominates leading to a stimulation. This interpretation also requires that α669βγ single channel current is already saturated at this [Na+]i in agreement with measurements of the whole cell conductance (Fig. 3).
A 25 mM increase of [Na+]i from a low baseline of 12 mM is shown in Figure 10B. In both cases the final conductance obtained in 37 mM [Na+]i was stimulated to the range of 132-142% of control. However, the initial responses obtained as [Na+]i increased from 12 to 37 mM were markedly different between the 2 isoforms indicating likely differences in the increase of single channel current by Na+. In the case of α728βγ it exhibited an initial increase to 175% of control, while α669βγ exhibited a larger increase to 380% of control. As the [Na+]i stabilized, α728βγ exhibited little further effects while α728βγ was inhibited nearly 3 fold (from 380% to 140%). These effects complement the changes observed in panel A and together indicate that the acute Na+ sensitivity of α728βγ is shifted to the right of that of α669βγ where both the initial increase and subsequent inhibition occur at higher [Na+]i.
To examine the acute effects of variable and incremental increases of [Na+]i we voltage clamped membranes to −100 mV. Shown in Figure 11A are the effects of a voltage driven Na+ loading from a high baseline of 70 mM [Na+]i. Similar to the results of Figure 10, a larger initial increase is observed in α728βγ. This was smaller in magnitude to that observed above given that the changes here are more gradual. Similarly, a larger final inhibition is observed in α728βγ but at a higher [Na+]i consistent with the interpretation above that α728βγ is rightward shifted in terms of sodium sensitivity.
Voltage loading from a low [Na+]i of 12 mM is shown in Figure 11B. Consistent with the data above a small stimulation followed by inhibition is observed for α669βγ as [Na+]i increased past 20 mM. Given the high conductances of α728βγ oocytes, and consistent with the expectation from Figure 10 that clamping to −100 mV would result in further marked stimulation of the conductance in low Na+, currents produced in this group were both too large to reliably clamp and damaging to the oocytes. For these reasons these experiments could not be carried out.
Discussion
α728βγ forms a highly active channel
We report that the longer N-terminus in α ENaC modifies channel properties and regulation. Our data show that α728βγ channels showed differences in rectification and voltage activation; both intrinsic channel properties. Additionally, α728βγ channels are highly active despite similar single channel conductance to α669βγ and lower density at the membrane than α669βγ. This was observed in spite of little response to activation by proteolysis and notwithstanding the low levels of endogenous cleavage of α728 at the membrane. This isoform also responded differently to both chronic and acute changes in [Na+] indicating a rightward shift in the sensitivity to changes of [Na+]i. Despite these marked differences, α728βγ was activated by cold temperature similar to α669βγ. Thus, based on the relative expression of short vs. long α we expect major changes to epithelial sodium handling and intrinsic regulation in humans.
As α728 is present in the kidney it is reasonable to conclude that this isoform serves a biological function that is distinct from that of α669. A high activity form of ENaC may have a desired role in preventing either salt wasting, or hyponatremia and an undesired role of promoting salt sensitive hypertension. This isoform could have developed evolutionarily as means of conserving sodium in a rare sodium environment.
A variety of lines of evidence point to α728 behaving more like αrENaC than α669 hENaC. It has higher baseline activity, as well as homology to the rat sequence. Consistent with this explanation is the lower activation of rodent ENaC by trypsin than that observed in the short human isoform.16,29
α728βγ fragments and processing
Full length α728 migrated at a size consistent with the presence of an additional 59 a.a. to α669. However, cleaved α728 was 4 kDa larger than cleaved α669. Currently, 2 sites have been have been proposed and validated to be cleaved by endogenous furin type proteases.29 These sites are approximately 26 a.a. apart. This shift in mass would be consistent with a shift in preference of cleavage between α669 and α728 from the second furin site (RRAR) to the first furin site (RSRR) resulting in a large cleaved fragment in α728 which is 26 a.a. longer. Alternatively, one would have to propose post translational differences between the 2 subunits occurring prior to cleavage; as cleavage in the same location in the absence of either explanation would result in an identical product for the 2 α isoforms. This remains to be tested but would allow toggling between regulatory pathways affecting each isoform independently.
Cleavage of α728 in urinary exosomes was variable between subjects. Invariably, the full length isoform was observed at 87 kDa. A product at 27 kDa was observed (see Fig. 7 and supplementary Figure). The intensity of this product was variable demonstrating possible variability among subjects. The size of this product is consistent with cleavage at the first furin site; although we cannot rule out additional processing of these fragments by the urinary proteases as evident by the presence of additional smaller fragments that were competed with excess immunizing peptide.
Protease activation in high and low Na+
The fraction of cleaved to full length protein expression was similar for trimeric channels expressing α728 or α669. This indicates that the extended N-terminus does not hinder access of endogenous proteases to the channel. However, there were marked differences in the response of these channels to exogenous proteases in a manner that is [Na+] dependent. Moreover, there are also differences in the levels of baseline cleavage of these isoforms in different [Na+].
Proteolytic activation provides a mechanism for rapid channel activation and is therefore an important acute regulator of Na+ absorption especially given the abundance of urinary proteases which could potentially act on ENaC.30,31 Our data show that the ratio of channel activation by cleavage (Fig. 4), and also baseline cleavage (Fig. 6C), are positively correlated with the [Na+]. We also show that the activity of trimeric α728 is negatively correlated with cleavage and [Na+]i (Figs. 3 and 6). The similarity in profile of cleavage by trypsin, subtilisin and endogenous proteases indicate that the differences in [Na+]-dependent activation are generalized effects. This has been interpreted by others as a relief of Na+-self inhibition by cleavage.32 However, when comparing α728 to α669 at high Na+ such an interpretation would be inconsistent with the larger effects of increasing [Na+]i on α728βγ (Fig. 10A), and the lower stimulation by exogenous cleavage of this isoform (Fig. 4C and E). Irrespective of the exact mechanism, this effect of [Na+]i on cleavage could represent a valuable mechanism to preserve pools of uncleaved channels to respond to recoveries from periods of elevated sodium conditions.
We find that both α isoforms are most active under low [Na+]; the condition which exhibits the least endogenous proteolysis and the least fold activation by external proteases. Therefore, the high baseline activity seen under low [Na+] and that seen through proteolytic activation at high [Na+] cannot occur through the same mechanism. Thus, more than one channel open state must exist to account for these 2 processes. We denote these 2 open states as Ocleaved and O1 (summarized below).
The exact ratio of different α isoforms in the collecting duct, or other human epithelia for that matter, is unknown. However, it is known that activation by proteases in native and even cultured epithelial tissue is variable.33 Such variability may possibly reflect different [Na+]i conditions and also multiple channel pools with differing activity due to different α subunit composition.
Na+ sensitivity
The driving forces across the apical membrane and by extension [Na+]i in an epithelium is, unlike that in a single non-polarized cell, dependent on numerous factors that include apical and basolateral permeability as well as paracellular shunt resistance.34 We examined the responses of both α isoforms in the concentration range of 12-110 mM [Na+]i. Given a Na+ activity coefficient in the range of 0.8 35 these represent activities in the range of 9.5–88 mM. The upper end of activity does not necessarily represent physiological values however, the entire scale is broad and covers low baseline values normally encountered 36-39, higher values that are or could be encountered, and high values that aid in better describing the complete relationship and differences in the effects of [Na+] on α728βγ. The ease of manipulating these concentrations represents an important strength of the oocyte system.
Our data indicate clear differences in the response of these 2 isoforms to Na+ throughout the entire range of activities examined. Channels formed with α728 exhibited a rightward shift in the response to [Na+]i. In other words, they were less sensitive to inhibition by Na+ than α669. In the range of activities which could be encountered in the collecting duct of 28 mM or less39, α728 channels exhibited further activation by increasing [Na+]i and this occurred in a cleavage independent manner. A simple hypothesis that could explain this effect is that the extended N-terminus in α728 may contain or modify a Na+ sensor. The latter explanation is more feasible as the former would require the presence of multiple Na+ sensors and high and low sensitivity to inhibition of α728 by Na+.
Irrespective of the biophysical basis, alternative responses to [Na+] between isoforms may provide tissue specific responses to [Na+]. For example, in the kidney it may be desirable to have a rapid decrease in absorption in response to an acute increase in luminal [Na+] to buffer against transient changes in [Na+] changing blood volume; while in the lung it may be desirable to have a slower response to acute changes in plasma [Na+] to prevent edema. These differences are further highlighted if one considers possible differences in [Na+]i between different epithelia.
Kinetic model
Activations of ENaC by cold and by proteolysis likely represent distinct processes that increase open probability. Activation by cold is reversible, while that by cleavage is irreversible. Cold activation occurs through rigidification of the membrane, while proteolytic activation occurs through either loss of the first transmembrane domain,19 or loss of an inhibitory peptide.18 Our data further highlight and confirm these differences as proteolytic activation for these two isoforms was markedly different but temperature dependent activation was the same. This indicates that these two open states cannot be the same and further cannot communicate otherwise temperature activation of α728βγ would be different than α669βγ. These two modes of activation are likely due to two different non-communicating open states rather than closed non-communicating states, although the latter cannot be excluded. These are denoted as Ocleaved and O2.
Our data also indicate that a large part of α728βγ baseline activity could occur in the absence of cleavage. This requires the presence of a third distinct open state. This state was described above and denoted as O1. It is also likely non-communicating with other open states as α728βγ is still subject to similar activation by cold. This state is also observed in α669βγ given its high activity in the absence of appreciable endogenous cleavage in low [Na+]. This multiple open state model is illustrated in Figure 12. For simplicity, only multiple open states are illustrated, although the data are also explained by multiple non-communicating closed states.
This model offers a kinetic explanation for the low sensitivity to proteolysis in α728βγ as well as α669βγ in low [Na+]: the proteolytic substrate may only become accessible to digest in a closed state. High activity in low [Na+] (or in general for α728βγ) would cause a higher occupancy of the open state, and reduced sensitivity to cleavage. Additional tests for these predictions are required; however, the similarities and difference between α728βγ and α669βγ activation by cleavage, cold temperature and baseline activity provide clear evidence for supporting the presence of multiple states.
Modularity of ENaC
In addition to δ, and α669, α728 is a third human ENaC subunit that can form distinct high activity channels with β and γ. Several examples exist of ion channels with subunit modularity either due to alternative splicing or alternate subunits, including voltage gated calcium channels,40,41 and voltage gated potassium channels.42 The modularity of ENaC may also explain some of the interpersonal or inter-population differences in Na+ handling and blood pressure. The ENaC sequences themselves are highly conserved, but differential expression of alternatively spliced α or expression of δ may account for individual or population level variations in both activity and regulation of activity.
Materials and Methods
RNA
The extra 177 bases from the longer α isoform were synthesized (Genscript, Piscataway NJ) (NCBI accession # NM_001159576) and ligated upstream of the start site into a DNA plasmid containing the coding sequence for α669 which also contained 2 HA tags as previously described.43 This plasmid was linearized and translated into RNA with the RiboMAX T7 transcription kit (Promega, Madison WI). Capped RNA was quantified with a Nanodrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo-Fisher, Waltham MA), and by RNA gel electrophoresis. This assured equal injection of all ENaC subunit isoform cRNAs.
Xenopus oocytes
Xenopus (Xenopus Express, Brooksville FL) oocytes were obtained by surgical excision of the ovarian lobes. Oocytes were digested with type IA collagenase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MO) in Ca2+ free OR2 medium as previously described.44 Stage V and VI oocytes were selected and allowed to recover overnight in ND94 medium with (94 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 2 mM KCl, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) containing 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Mediatech, Corning NY) and 50 µg/ml amikacin (MP Biomedical, Solon OH).
Oocytes were injected with 2.5 ng RNA for each ENaC subunit, except those which expressed α alone which were injected with 25 ng. Oocytes were then incubated in the 96 mM Na+ incubation solution (chronic high Na+) or a similar solution that contained 9.6 mM NaCl and replaced the rest with 86.4 mM N-methyl-D-glucamine (chronic low Na+). Oocytes were recorded from 18-72 hours post injection. Western blot analyses were performed on protein homogenates obtained from oocytes 48–72 hours post injection.
Two electrode voltage clamp
Oocyte recordings and calculation of membrane conductance and capacitance were carried out as previously described.22 Briefly, oocytes were clamped to a holding potential of either 0, or −100 mV with a TEV-200 voltage clamp (Dagan Instruments, Minneapolis MN). Conductance and capacitance were measured every 10s as the slope conductance at the holding potential. In these experiments current/voltage relationships were measured by 500 mS pulses from −100 to +40 mV. Clamping was carried out using agar-Ag/AgCl electrodes as previously described to avoid flow and time dependent artifacts.45
In experiments which acutely Na+ loaded oocytes, or following intracellular Na+ injection, voltage was clamped to −100 mV (see Mechanical Loading). In both cases, and unless otherwise noted, all reported values of conductance represent the amiloride sensitive portion (10 µM amiloride). In all experiments the recording chamber was continuously perfused at 8 mL/minute.
Mechanical loading (Sodium Injection)
Oocytes were clamped to 0 mV and injected with a 27.6 nL bolus of 0.5 M Na2SO4 to increase [Na+]i by 25 mM as previously described.14 Na2SO4 was selected to avoid any effects of chloride. To sustain high [Na+] and prevent efflux of injected Na+, injected oocytes were clamped to −100 mV for the 1st 2 min, followed by a return to 0 mV to prevent large increases in [Na+]i. The slope conductance at −100 mV was measured by a 500 ms pulse protocol.
Voltage loading (−100 mV clamp)
Oocytes were acutely loaded with Na+ by clamping to −100 mV for up to 20 min. This allowed larger and more variable changes of [Na+]i. In these experiments, slope conductance at −100 mV and reversal potential were measured every second by applying a voltage ramp from −100 mV to +20 mV for 100 ms; with membrane voltage remaining clamped to −100 mV for the remaining 900 ms. Input and output signals were generated or recorded at 5 kHz yielding a voltage change during the ramp of 0.24 mV per point. The command voltage signal was generated, and the current return signal was measured by a National Instruments MyDaq data acquisition board (Austin TX), captured in NI Signal Express, and analyzed in R (R Project for Statistical Computing). This protocol allowed us to clamp membrane potential to −100 mV 90% of the time and to examine the effects of internal [Na+] on inhibition with high time resolution.
Cell attached patch clamp
Oocytes were devitellinized by shrinking for 5 min in 100 mM sucrose in high or low [Na+] solutions, followed by manual removal of the vitelline membrane. Oocytes were then allowed to recover in a bath solution of high or low sodium for 10–15 min. The pipette solution matched the bath solution in all cases. Cell attached single channel recordings were carried out at various holding voltages ranging between −100 mV to 0 mV using an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale CA) in cell-attached mode with a sintered Ag/AgCl pellet as reference. Signals from seals > 20GΩ were amplified at 500× gain and filtered at 200 Hz. Pipettes with resistances of 1–5 MΩ were pulled from acetone washed Corning 8161 glass (Corning Inc., Corning NY) using a multiple stage horizontal puller (Sutter Instruments, Novato CA). Electrodes were fire polished and tips were coated with polystyrene q-dope (GC electronics, Rockford IL). Signals were digitized at 1 kHz with an ADC (Digidata 1322A, Molecular Devices) and analyzed using Clampfit 9 (Molecular Devices).
Western blot – xenopus oocytes
Groups of 50 oocytes were biotinylated for 40 min on a random orbit shaker at 4°C with EZ-Link Sulfo-NHS-SS-Biotin (Pierce, Rockford, IL) at 0.8 mg/ml in ND94. Oocytes were washed 5× and resuspended in 10 µl/oocyte in homogenization buffer containing (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton ×-100, pH 7.4). The HB also contained protease inhibitors (Halt Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, Pierce). Oocytes were disrupted with a 25 gauge needle followed by a low speed spin (800 g) at 4°C to remove the yolk. The membrane fraction was pelleted at 18,000 g, resuspended in 10 µl/oocyte in HB, homogenized in a ground glass homogenizer and followed by sonication. The now soluble total membrane fraction was isolated at 18,000 g and used for Western blotting or incubated with Streptavidin conjugated agarose beads (Pierce) for isolation of the plasma membrane fraction. Biotinylated membrane proteins were eluted from the beads for 20 min at 65°C in buffer containing 1% BME. The protein equivalents of 20 or 2 oocytes (for membrane and intracellular, respectively) were loaded per lane on a 7.5% polyacrylamide gel, separated, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, blocked in 5% milk (TBS-T, (0.05% Tween-20). Membranes were probed with an anti-HA HRP-conjugated antibody (clone 3F10, Roche Inc., Indianapolis IN) and proteins were visualized by Enhanced Chemiluminescence (Super Signal Dura West, Pierce) in a gel documentation system (MP4000, BioRad Hercules CA). Intensities of raw unadjusted images were analyzed with included imaging software (BioRad).
Western blot – human urine
Urine from 6 participants (50 ml, 3 male and 3 female aged 23 to 70) was sequentially centrifuged at 300 g, 17,000 g and 200,000 g to pellet fractions corresponding to cell debris, intracellular organelles/large membranes, and exosomes, respectively as previously described.46 The pellet from each centrifugation step was homogenized, treated in 1x Laemmli's reducing buffer for 10 minutes at 37°C. The equivalent protein yield of 3 ml of urine was separated on 10% SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, then blocked in 5% milk for 1 h at room temperature, and followed by overnight at 4°C incubation with the primary α728 N-terminus specific antibody at a dilution of 1:2000. Membranes were washed 5× and incubated at room temperature with 1:20,000 dilution of the appropriate secondary antibody and visualized as above.
Antibody against α728
An antibody was produced using the peptide sequence “EGTQGPELSLDPDPC,” which is unique in humans to the α728 N-terminus as an antigen. The rabbit antibody exhibited a titer of >1:200,000 and was antigen purified. Antigenicity was also confirmed by the ability of this antibody to recognize HA-tagged α728 and the ability of the immunizing antigen to compete this signal (see Fig. S1 for further characterization).
Temperature Control
Chamber temperature was controlled by a Dagan HCC-100A temperature controller (Dagan Instruments) and an HE-200 thermal stage modified with an insulating layer of neoprene. Temperature was sampled in the bath and used as feedback for the controller. Chamber inflow was routed in the thermal stage block multiple times to allow pre-equilibration of solution and eliminate temperature variations from the perfusate.
Protease
ENaC expressing oocytes were treated with the serine proteases subtilisin or trypsin (50 ng/ml) for 15 min. The ratio of amiloride sensitive conductance before and after protease treatment was used as the degree of activation.
Significance was determined by Student's t-test. P of <0.05 was deemed significant and levels were indicated by * and ** for P < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. Summarized data are shown as means and standard error of the mean.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Funding
This work was supported by NIH grant DK55626, and by the John R. Oishei Foundation.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher's website.
References
- 1.Anantharam A, Palmer LG. Determination of epithelial Na+ channel subunit stoichiometry from single-channel conductances. J Gen Physiol [Internet] 2007. [cited 2014 February 20]; 130:55-70. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2154365&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:17562820; http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200609716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jasti J, Furukawa H, Gonzales EB, Gouaux E. Structure of acid-sensing ion channel 1 at 1.9 A resolution and low pH. Nature [Internet] 2007. [cited 2014 February 21]; 449:316-23. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17882215; PMID:17882215; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gonzales EB, Kawate T, Gouaux E. Pore architecture and ion sites in acid-sensing ion channels and P2X receptors. Nature [Internet] 2009. [cited 2014 January 20]; 460:599-604. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2845979&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:19641589; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Channel ES, Snyder PM, Mcdonald J, Stokes JB, Welshn MJ. Membrane topology of the amiloride-sensitive. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:24379-83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Babini E, Geisler H-S, Siba M, Gründer S. A new subunit of the epithelial Na+ channel identifies regions involved in Na+ self-inhibition. J Biol Chem [Internet] 2003. [cited 2014 February 21]; 278:28418-26. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12764146; PMID:12764146; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M301315200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kapoor N, Lee W, Clark E, Bartoszewski R, McNicholas CM, Latham CB, Bebok Z, Parpura V, Fuller CM, Palmer CA, et al. . Interaction of ASIC1 and ENaC subunits in human glioma cells and rat astrocytes. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol [Internet] 2011. [cited 2014 July 14]; 300:C1246-59. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3118626&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:21346156; http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00199.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Thomas CP, Auerbach S, Stokes JB, Volk KA. 5’ heterogeneity in epithelial sodium channel alpha-subunit mRNA leads to distinct NH2-terminal variant proteins. Am J Physiol [Internet] 1998 [cited 2014 March 13]; 274:C1312-23. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9612219; PMID:9612219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Butterworth MB. Regulation of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) by membrane trafficking. Biochim Biophys Acta [Internet] 2010. [cited 2014 July 23]; 1802:1166-77. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2921481&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:20347969; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.03.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chraïbi A, Vallet V, Firsov D, Hess SK, Horisberger JD. Protease modulation of the activity of the epithelial sodium channel expressed in Xenopus oocytes. J Gen Physiol [Internet] 1998. [cited 2014 February 27]; 111:127-38. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1887769&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:9417140; http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.111.1.127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Abriel H, Horisberger JD. Feedback inhibition of rat amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channels expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. J Physiol [Internet] 1999. [cited 2014 February 26]; 516(Ptt 1):31-43. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2269211&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:10066920; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.031aa.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chraïbi A, Horisberger J-D. Na self inhibition of human epithelial Na channel: temperature dependence and effect of extracellular proteases. J Gen Physiol [Internet] 2002. [cited 2014 July 23]; 120:133-45. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2234458&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:12149276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Anantharam A, Tian Y, Palmer LG. Open probability of the epithelial sodium channel is regulated by intracellular sodium. J Physiol [Internet] 2006. [cited 2014 February 26]; 574:333-47. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1817776&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:16690707; http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.109173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lindemann B. Fluctuation analysis of sodium channels in epithelia. Annu Rev Physiol [Internet] 1984. [cited 2014 February 26]; 46:497-515. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6324660; PMID:6324660; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.46.030184.002433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Awayda MS. Regulation of the epithelial Na(+) channel by intracellular Na(+). Am J Physiol [Internet] 1999. [cited 2014 February 27]; 277:C216-24. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10444397; PMID:10444397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Awayda MS, Platzer JD, Reger RL, Bengrine A. Role of PKCalpha in feedback regulation of Na(+) transport in an electrically tight epithelium. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol [Internet] 2002. [cited 2014 July 14]; 283:C1122-32. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12225976; PMID:12225976; http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00142.2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Caldwell RA, Boucher RC, Stutts MJ. Serine protease activation of near-silent epithelial Na+ channels. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol [Internet] 2004. [cited 2014 February 26]; 286:C190-4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12967915; PMID:12967915; http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00342.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vallet V, Chraibi A, Gaeggeler HP, Horisberger JD, Rossier BC. An epithelial serine protease activates the amiloride-sensitive sodium channel. Nature [Internet] 1997. [cited 2014 January 21]; 389:607-10. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9335501; PMID:9335501; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/39329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Carattino MD, Sheng S, Bruns JB, Pilewski JM, Hughey RP, Kleyman TR. The epithelial Na+ channel is inhibited by a peptide derived from proteolytic processing of its alpha subunit. J Biol Chem [Internet] 2006. [cited 2014 February 27]; 281:18901-7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16690613; PMID:16690613; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M604109200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hu JC, Bengrine A, Lis A, Awayda MS. Alternative mechanism of activation of the epithelial na+ channel by cleavage. J Biol Chem [Internet] 2009. [cited 2014 February 27]; 284:36334-45. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2794749&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:19858199; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.032870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Askwith CC, Benson CJ, Welsh MJ, Snyder PM. DEG/ENaC ion channels involved in sensory transduction are modulated by cold temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [Internet] 2001. [cited 2014 July 2]; 98:6459-63. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=33490&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:11353858;http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.111155398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Awayda MS, Shao W, Guo F, Zeidel M, Hill WG. ENaC-membrane interactions: regulation of channel activity by membrane order. J Gen Physiol [Internet] 2004. [cited 2014 July 2]; 123:709-27. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2234566&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:15148329; http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200308983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Awayda MS. Specific and nonspecific effects of protein kinase C on the epithelial Na (+) channel. J Gen Physiol [Internet] 2000. [cited 2014 February 25]; 115:559-70. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2217227&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:10779314; http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.115.5.559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vogel C, Marcotte EM. Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses. Nat Rev Genet [Internet] 2012. [cited 2014 March 23]; 13:227-32. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3654667&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:22411467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pisitkun T, Shen R-F, Knepper MA. Identification and proteomic profiling of exosomes in human urine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [Internet] 2004. [cited 2014 July 17]; 101:13368-73. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=516573&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:15326289; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403453101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Canessa CM, Schild L, Buell G, Thorens B, Gautschi I, Horisberger JD, Rossier BC. Amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na+ channel is made of three homologous subunits. Nature [Internet] 1994. [cited 2014 March 4]; 367:463-7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8107805; PMID:8107805; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/367463a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schild L, Canessa CM, Shimkets RA, Gautschi I, Lifton RP, Rossier BC. A mutation in the epithelial sodium channel causing Liddle disease increases channel activity in the Xenopus laevis oocyte expression system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [Internet] 1995. [cited 2014 March 4]; 92:5699-703. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=41764&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:7777572; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.12.5699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Awayda MS, Shao W, Guo F, Zeidel M, Hill WG. ENaC-membrane interactions: regulation of channel activity by membrane order. J Gen Physiol [Internet] 2004. [cited 2014 July 15]; 123:709-27. Available from: http://jgp.rupress.org/content/123/6/709.long; PMID:15148329; http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200308983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Palmer LG, Frindt G. Gating of Na channels in the rat cortical collecting tubule: effects of voltage and membrane stretch. J Gen Physiol [Internet] 1996. [cited 2014 October 16]; 107:35-45. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2219247&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:8741729; http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.107.1.35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hughey RP, Bruns JB, Kinlough CL, Harkleroad KL, Tong Q, Carattino MD, Johnson JP, Stockand JD, Kleyman TR. Epithelial sodium channels are activated by furin-dependent proteolysis. J Biol Chem [Internet] 2004. [cited 2014 July 21]; 279:18111-4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15007080; PMID:15007080; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C400080200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Buhl KB, Friis UG, Svenningsen P, Gulaveerasingam A, Ovesen P, Frederiksen-Møller B, Jespersen B, Bistrup C, Jensen BL. Urinary plasmin activates collecting duct ENaC current in preeclampsia. Hypertension [Internet] 2012. [cited 2014 July 21]; 60:1346-51. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22987920; PMID:22987920;http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.198879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Patel AB, Chao J, Palmer LG. Tissue kallikrein activation of the epithelial Na channel. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol [Internet] 2012. [cited 2014 July 21]; 303:F540-50. Available from: http://ajprenal.physiology.org/content/303/4/F540; PMID:22622459; http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00133.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sheng S, Carattino MD, Bruns JB, Hughey RP, Kleyman TR. Furin cleavage activates the epithelial Na+ channel by relieving Na+ self-inhibition. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol [Internet] 2006. [cited 2014 July 23]; 290:F1488-96. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16449353; PMID:16449353; http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00439.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nesterov V, Dahlmann A, Bertog M, Korbmacher C. Trypsin can activate the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) in microdissected mouse distal nephron. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol [Internet] 2008. [cited 2014 March 17]; 295:F1052-62. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18653483; PMID:18653483; http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00031.2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Harvey BJ. Energization of sodium absorption by the H(+)-ATPase pump in mitochondria-rich cells of frog skin. J Exp Biol [Internet] 1992. [cited 2014 July 29]; 172:289-309. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1491227; PMID:1491227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lide DR, editor. Mean activity coefficients of electrolytes as a function of concentration. In CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics [Internet]. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL; 2014. Available from: http://www.hbcpnetbase.com/ [Google Scholar]
- 36.Stoddard JS, Helman SI. Dependence of intracellular Na+ concentration on apical and basolateral membrane Na+ influx in frog skin. Am J Physiol [Internet] 1985. [cited 2014 July 24]; 249:F662-71. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3877468; PMID:3877468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rick R, Dörge A, von Arnim E, Thurau K. Electron microprobe analysis of frog skin epithelium: evidence for a syncytial sodium transport compartment. J Membr Biol [Internet] 1978. [cited 2014 July 24]; 39:313-31. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/641981; PMID:641981; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01869897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nagel W, Garcia-Diaz JF, Armstrong WM. Intracellular ionic activities in frog skin. J Membr Biol [Internet] 1981. [cited 2014 July 24]; 61:127-34. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6974243; PMID:6974243;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02007639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Solenov EI. Cell volume and sodium content in rat kidney collecting duct principal cells during hypotonic shock. J Biophys [Internet] 2008. [cited 2014 July 28]; 2008:420963 Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2809319&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:20107575; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/420963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Swayne LA, Bourinet E. Voltage-gated calcium channels in chronic pain: emerging role of alternative splicing. Pflugers Arch [Internet] 2008. [cited 2014 January 21]; 456:459-66. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18389277; PMID:18389277;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00424-007-0390-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bell TJ, Thaler C, Castiglioni AJ, Helton TD, Lipscombe D. Cell-specific alternative splicing increases calcium channel current density in the pain pathway. Neuron [Internet] 2004. [cited 2014 March 18]; 41:127-38. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14715140; PMID:14715140; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00801-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.McCormack K, McCormack T, Tanouye M, Rudy B, Stühmer W. Alternative splicing of the human Shaker K+ channel beta 1 gene and functional expression of the beta 2 gene product. FEBS Lett [Internet] 1995. [cited 2014 March 18]; 370:32-6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7649300; PMID:7649300; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(95)00785-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bengrine A, Li J, Hamm LL, Awayda MS. Indirect activation of the epithelial Na+ channel by trypsin. J Biol Chem [Internet] 2007. [cited 2014 March 17]; 282:26884-96. Available from: http://www.jbc.org/content/282/37/26884.long; PMID:17627947; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M611829200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Awayda MS. Regulation of the Epithelial Na+ Channel by Membrane Tension. J Gen Physiol [Internet] 1998. [cited 2014 July 23]; 112:97-111. Available from: http://jgp.rupress.org/content/112/2/97?ijkey=673bc41c3b2fcfc28b87ac15dfab4c673adafc2a&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha; PMID:9689021; http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.112.2.97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Berman JM, Awayda MS. Redox artifacts in electrophysiological recordings. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol [Internet] 2013. [cited 2014 January 29]; 304:C604-13. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23344161; PMID:23344161; http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00318.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhou H, Yuen PST, Pisitkun T, Gonzales PA, Yasuda H, Dear JW, Gross P, Knepper MA, Star RA. Collection, storage, preservation, and normalization of human urinary exosomes for biomarker discovery. Kidney Int [Internet] 2006. [cited 2014 July 10]; 69:1471-6. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2276656&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:16501490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rambaldi D, Ciccarelli FD. FancyGene: dynamic visualization of gene structures and protein domain architectures on genomic loci. Bioinformatics [Internet] 2009. [cited 2014 February 10]; 25:2281-2. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2734320&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:19542150; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chalfant ML, Denton JS, Langloh AL, Karlson KH, Loffing J, Benos DJ, Stanton BA. The NH(2) terminus of the epithelial sodium channel contains an endocytic motif. J Biol Chem [Internet] 1999. [cited 2014 March 18]; 274:32889-96. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10551853; PMID:10551853; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.46.32889 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.