Skip to main content
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1983 Apr;38(4):297–301. doi: 10.1136/thx.38.4.297

Dose-response comparison of ipratropium bromide from a metered-dose inhaler and by jet nebulisation.

S A Gomm, N P Keaney, L P Hunt, S C Allen, T B Stretton
PMCID: PMC459539  PMID: 6223402

Abstract

The dose-response relationships of the anticholinergic bronchodilator drug ipratropium bromide were studied. Cumulative doses totalling 288 micrograms ipratropium were given by inhalation of a liquid aerosol from a Wright nebuliser to each of 10 patients with stable, moderately severe airflow obstruction. Up to 80% of the maximum achievable bronchodilator response, as assessed by a rise in the patients' mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), was obtained with a cumulative total dose of 72 micrograms; with additional doses beyond 72 micrograms there was no significant further improvement. In the same patients the effects of administration of cumulative doses of ipratropium to a total of 72 micrograms from a Wright nebuliser were compared with those achieved with a metered-dose inhaler. Bronchodilatation was assessed by measurement of peak expiratory flow rate, FEV1, forced vital capacity, thoracic gas volume and specific airways conductance (sGaw). No significant difference was observed in the response at any dose level between the wet and the dry aerosols. By fitting a curve to the mean values of FEV1 and sGaw an estimate was made of the dose of ipratropium bromide required to produce 99% of the achievable bronchodilator response. For FEV1 this dose was 78 micrograms when ipratropium was inhaled as a nebulised solution from the Wright nebuliser and 82 micrograms when it was inhaled from the metered-dose inhaler; for sGaw the respective values were 54 and 58 micrograms. In these patients with stable airflow obstruction there was no therapeutic advantage in the use of ipratropium bromide as a wet aerosol.

Full text

PDF
297

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen C. J., Campbell A. H. Dose response of ipratropium assessed by two methods. Thorax. 1980 Feb;35(2):137–139. doi: 10.1136/thx.35.2.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Booker D. V., Chamberlain A. C., Rundo J., Muir D. C., Thomson M. L. Elimination of 5 mu particles from the human lung. Nature. 1967 Jul 1;215(5096):30–33. doi: 10.1038/215030a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang N., Levison H. The effect of a nebulized bronchodilator administered with or without intermittent positive pressure breathing on ventilatory function in children with cystic fibrosis and asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1972 Dec;106(6):867–872. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1972.106.6.867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Editorial: Lymphocyte subpopulations in chronic inflammatory diseases. Br Med J. 1975 Apr 5;2(5961):1–2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5961.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Godfrey S., Zeidifard E., Brown K., Bell J. H. The possible site of action of sodium cromoglycate assessed by exercise challenge. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1974 Feb;46(2):265–272. doi: 10.1042/cs0460265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldberg I. S., Lourenço R. V. Deposition of aerosols in pulmonary disease. Arch Intern Med. 1973 Jan;131(1):88–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pavia D., Thomson M. L., Clarke S. W., Shannon H. S. Effect of lung function and mode of inhalation on penetration of aerosol into the human lung. Thorax. 1977 Apr;32(2):194–197. doi: 10.1136/thx.32.2.194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stanescu D. C., De Sutter P., Van De Woestijne K. P. Pressure-corrected flow body plethysmograph. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1972 Feb;105(2):304–305. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1972.105.2.304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Thomson M. L., Short M. D. Mucociliary function in health, chronic obstructive airway disease, and asbestosis. J Appl Physiol. 1969 May;26(5):535–539. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1969.26.5.535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. WRIGHT B. M. A new nebuliser. Lancet. 1958 Jul 5;2(7036):24–25. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(58)90009-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES