Skip to main content
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1983 Jun;38(6):468–471. doi: 10.1136/thx.38.6.468

Errors in the measurement of total lung capacity in chronic obstructive lung disease.

P D Paré, B J Wiggs, C A Coppin
PMCID: PMC459585  PMID: 6879500

Abstract

The standard plethysmographic method of measuring total lung capacity (TLC) has been reported to result in spuriously high estimates in patients with severe airway obstruction. The helium-dilution method is known to underestimate TLC in the same patients. To determine the magnitude of these possible errors we measured TLC by four methods in 20 patients with varying degrees of chronic obstructive lung disease and in 11 normal subjects. TLC was measured by (1) helium dilution (TLCHe); (2) a volume-displacement body plethysmograph, box volume being plotted against mouth pressure (TLCm); (3) the same body plethysmograph with volume plotted against pressure measured with an oesophageal balloon (TLCes); and (4) a radiological technique (TLCxr). In normal subjects there was no difference between TCLm (6.57 +/- 1.20) and TLCes (6.51 +/- 1.24). In the patients with chronic obstructive lung disease TLCm gave results significantly higher than those of any other method. If TLCes is taken as the closest estimate of true TLC, TLCm consistently overestimates and TLCHe underestimates TLC. There was no relationship between the degree of airway obstruction and (TLCm - TLCes) but there was between (TLCes - TLCHe) and severity of airway obstruction. We conclude that using mouth pressure in the plethysmographic measurement of TLC in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease results in consistent but slight overestimation of TLC.

Full text

PDF
468

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brown R., Hoppin F. G., Jr, Ingram R. H., Jr, Saunders N. A., McFadden E. R., Jr Influence of abdominal gas on the Boyle's law determination of thoracic gas volume. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1978 Mar;44(3):469–473. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1978.44.3.469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown R., Ingram R. H., Jr, McFadden E. R., Jr Problems in the plethysmographic assessment of changes in total lung capacity in asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978 Oct;118(4):685–692. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1978.118.4.685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown R., Scharf S., Ingram R. H., Jr Nonhomogeneous alveolar pressure swings in the presence of airway closure. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1980 Sep;49(3):398–402. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1980.49.3.398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ferris B. G. Epidemiology Standardization Project (American Thoracic Society). Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978 Dec;118(6 Pt 2):1–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Habib M. P., Engel L. A. Influence of the panting technique on the plethysmographic measurement of thoracic gas volume. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978 Feb;117(2):265–271. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1978.117.2.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Morris J. F., Koski A., Johnson L. C. Spirometric standards for healthy nonsmoking adults. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1971 Jan;103(1):57–67. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1971.103.1.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rodenstein D. O., Stănescu D. C. Reassessment of lung volume measurement by helium dilution and by body plethysmography in chronic air-flow obstruction. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Dec;126(6):1040–1044. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.6.1040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stănescu D. C., Rodenstein D., Cauberghs M., Van de Woestijne K. P. Failure of body plethysmography in bronchial asthma. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982 Apr;52(4):939–948. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1982.52.4.939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES