Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics logoLink to Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
. 2015 Sep-Oct;49(5):496–501. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.164040

Surgical hip dislocation for treatment of cam femoroacetabular impingement

Milind M Chaudhary 1,, Ishani M Chaudhary 1, KN Vikas 1, Aung KoKo 1, Than Zaw 1, A Siddhartha 1
PMCID: PMC4598539  PMID: 26538754

Abstract

Background:

Cam femoroacetabular impingement is caused by a misshapen femoral head with a reduced head neck offset, commonly in the anterolateral quadrant. Friction in flexion, adduction and internal rotation causes limitation of the hip movements and pain progressively leading to labral and chondral damage and osteoarthritis. Surgical hip dislocation described by Ganz permits full exposure of the hip without damaging its blood supply. An osteochondroplasty removes the bump at the femoral head neck junction to recreate the offset for impingement free movement.

Materials and Methods:

Sixteen patients underwent surgery with surgical hip dislocation for the treatment of cam femoroacetabular impingement by open osteochondroplasty over last 6 years. Eight patients suffered from sequelae of avascular necrosis (AVN). Three had a painful dysplastic hip. Two had sequelae of Perthes disease. Three had combined cam and pincer impingement caused by retroversion of acetabulum. All patients were operated by the trochanteric flip osteotomy with attachments of gluteus medius and vastus lateralis, dissection was between the piriformis and gluteus minimus preserving the external rotators. Z-shaped capsular incision and dislocation of the hip was done in external rotation. Three cases also had subtrochanteric osteotomy. Two cases of AVN also had an intraarticular femoral head reshaping osteotomy.

Results:

Goals of treatment were achieved in all patients. No AVN was detected after a 6 month followup. There were no trochanteric nonunions. Hip range of motion improved in all and Harris hip score improved significantly in 15 of 16 cases. Mean alpha angle reduced from 86.13° (range 66°–108°) to 46.35° (range 39°–58°).

Conclusion:

Cam femoroacetabular Impingement causing pain and limitation of hip movements was treated by open osteochondroplasty after surgical hip dislocation. This reduced pain, improved hip motion and gave good to excellent results in the short term.

Keywords: Cam lesion, femoroacetabular impingement, pincer impingement, surgical hip dislocation

Mesh terms: Impingement syndrome, hip dislocation, surgical technique

INTRODUCTION

Femoroacetabular impingement causes pain and limitation of movement in the hip.1 Cam impingement is caused by a misshapen femoral head with a reduced femoral head neck offset. Surgical Hip Dislocation was described by Ganz2 to effectively expose the hip without damaging its blood supply3 Cam impingement is usually in the anterolateral zone and causes excessive pressure against the labrum and chondrolabral junction in flexion adduction and internal rotation.4,5,6 It is seen on the anteroposterior (AP) X-ray as a pistol grip deformity of the femoral head or as the sagging rope sign or by the presence of anterolateral extrusion of the femoral head. Special lateral views like the cross table lateral, false profile and modified Dunn view show the loss of the femoral head-neck offset or the presence of a bump at the anterior head-neck junction. We measured the severity of the impingement by the alpha angle.5 It is the angle between the femoral neck axis and the line connecting the head center with the point of beginning asphericity of head-neck contour. Pincer impingement is caused by acetabular retroversion and anterior over coverage. This is seen on an AP X-ray of the hip as the crossover sign and prominence of the ischial spine.7 Clinical examination reveals pain on flexion adduction and internal rotation of the hip.8,9

Surgical hip dislocation enables 360° visualization of the femoral head and acetabulum. An osteochondroplasty removes the bump, deepens the head-neck offset and allows impingement free movement. Surgical dislocation also permits other procedures like relative neck lengthening, head reduction osteotomies, distalization of the trochanter and subtrochanteric osteotomies. All of these help reduce pain and increase hip range of motion and prolong the life of the native young hip.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

16 consecutive patients who had surgical hip dislocation at our institute over the last 6 years were included in study. There were 11 males and 5 females having 9 left and 7 right hips. The mean age of the patients was 28.3 years (range 12–55 years). 8 patients had residual effects after avascular necrosis (AVN) with cam impingement. 3 had dysplastic hips with cam impingement and proximal migration of the greater trochanter. 2 had residual deformities after Perthes disease. Three female patients had retroversion of the hip with cam and pincer impingement. We treated the cam impingement in all three, but attempted to tackle the pincer impingement only in one of the patients [Table 1].

Table 1.

Clinical details of patients

graphic file with name IJOrtho-49-496-g001.jpg

All the cases presented with pain in the hip, limp and limitation of movements and activities. Cam femoroacetabular impingement was diagnosed in all cases on clinical examination and plain X-rays. Only three patients had a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Magnetic resonance arthrography was not performed for diagnosis.

The patients were symptomatic for a mean of 23.4 months (range 1–48 months) and have been followed-up after surgery for a mean of 24.8 months (range 6–55 months). Mean preoperative Harris hip score (HHS) was 47.86 (range 6.54–85). The preoperative Tonnis grading did not correlate well with the preoperative HHS on Pearson correlation coefficient (r = –0.090), the slope being not significantly different from zero (P = 0.72). Preoperative alpha angle was a mean of 86.13° (range 66°–108°) denoting severe cam impingement.

Operative procedure

Surgical hip dislocation has been described in detail.2 We followed the technique without creating a step in the trochanter. In 3 of our cases, the trochanteric osteotomy became a thin sliver but did not affect exposure of the hip or its healing. The depth of cut can be difficult to determine in dysplastic hips and those with excess or reduced version.

Osteochondroplasty10,11 to improve offset of the femoral head neck junction was performed in all 16. A curved osteotome was used to remove excessive bone from the neck as well as the head. Intraoperative bleeding was noted in all cases. In no case was the neck thinned significantly. An impingement test was performed intraoperatively to ensure the adequacy of excision of the bump and ensure smooth movement of the head against the labrum.

Relative neck lengthening12,13 was performed in 4 cases by a subperiosteal dissection using a thin sharp osteotome to preserve the extended retinacular flap. Bony resection at the inferolateral corner of the neck was performed along with distalization of the trochanter to extent of 15 mm.

A subtrochanteric osteotomy14 was performed in 3 patients with AVN. One was fixed with a locking plate, and two were fixed with an Ilizarov fixator. Medial displacement was performed in all. In the patients fixed with an Ilizarov fixator, a valgus angulation ensured that the lateral affected zone of the femoral head stayed away from the weight bearing zone of the acetabulum. A distal devalgus and lengthening osteotomy15 was performed in both cases.

Intraarticular osteotomy to reshape the femoral head16 was performed in two cases of residual effects of AVN. The femoral head had a saddle shaped deformity with a depression under the lip of the acetabulum. The central depressed zone of the femoral head was excised. The extruded lateral portion and medial portion of the femoral head had reasonably good articular cartilage. These were coapted and fixed with two countersunk screws. The resultant contour was reasonably spherical and a distinct improvement from the preoperative status. Bleeding from the cut edges of the osteotomy was noted during surgery.

The three of our patients who had retroversion of the acetabulum had cam as well as pincer impingement. We performed osteochondroplasty in all three. In only one of the patients did we perform an acetabular rim trim with refixation of the labrum17 with anchor sutures. However, since it was our first case, we could not achieve an adequate resection of the acetabular rim.

RESULTS

The surgical objectives (to recreate femoral head-neck offset and reduce cam impingement) were achieved in all cases. Only 3 of our patients had followup <12 months and only 5 had a followup <18 months. The HHS was significantly improved in 15 of the 16 hips. Mean postoperative HHS was 90.69 (range 78–100). The mean difference in the HHS was 43.09 points (range 3.25–70.8). The paired t-test for difference in the means of preoperative and postoperative HHS was significant (P < 0.001) There were 7 excellent results (HHS > 90). Eight good results (HHS 80–89) and one fair result (HHS 78).

Mean postoperative alpha angle18 was 46.75° (range 39°–58°) when the mean preoperative angle was 86.13° and the difference was significant (two tailed P < 0.0001).

Complications

There were no cases of nonunion of the greater trochanter. There were no wound infections.

Two patients of AVN with a subtrochanteric osteotomy using an Ilizarov fixator had significant complications. One developed a fracture at the midshaft osteotomy for which the fixator was reapplied. Another had pin track infection with a ring sequestrum, which needed debridement. There were 4 cases of class I heterotopic ossification around the tip of the trochanter. None suffered loss of motion.

DISCUSSION

Femoroacetabular impingement is now recognized as a clinical entity causing hip pain in the young. If untreated, it leads to labral and chondro labral damage and eventually to the development of arthritis of the hip.6 The incidence of femoroacetabular impingement is perhaps under reported and largely unrecognized. Kumar and Aggarwal19 described radiological changes in 50 symptomatic patients. Malhotra et al.20 have shown the similarity in the measurement of alpha and beta angles and the offset ratio comparable to that in the western literature. However, there are few published reports of treatment of this condition from India. Madhuri et al.21 have reported on eight patients that they operated upon for osteoplasty for various indications with a short followup. They described their technique of assessing femoral head vascularity rather than the exposure or technique of osteoplasty or short-term clinical results. Naranje et al.22 described surgical hip dislocation in 18 patients who had acetabular fractures to determine the accuracy of reduction.

Perthes disease [Figure 1] and Dysplasia [Figure 2] are known to cause secondary osteoarthritis. Joseph23 has found in a long term study of the natural history of Perthes that 76% of cases end up with a nonspherical femoral head. The treatment of post Perthes femoral head deformities has been described by Leunig and Ganz12 and Paley.16 Coxa magna and an elliptical shape were seen in our patients. We performed osteochondroplasty and relative neck lengthening in our patients.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

X-ray (L) hip joint anteroposterior view in a 14 year old following Perthes disease 4 years ago showing (a) femoral head is extruded anterolaterally with an irregular shape. There is significant pain on sitting in a low chair and on flexion-adduction-internal rotation. (b) After safe surgical dislocation, the femoral head-neck offset is restored after osteochondroplasty. There is no more impingement and hip movements have become free. Harris hip score has improved from 42 to almost 100

Figure 2.

Figure 2

X-ray (L) hip joint anteroposterior view in a dysplatic hip in a (a) 16-year-old showing an extrusion of the femoral head is seen antero-laterally giving rise to pain and restricted abduction-internal rotation. (b) After trochanteric osteotomy, osteochondroplasty is performed to restore almost spherical shape and the femoral head-neck offset. Trochanter fixed with 3 screws. Minimum relative neck lengthening has been performed. Harris hip score has improved from 49 to 89

AVN happens to be the commonest indication for performing a total hip replacement in India,24 the Swedish national registry has clearly shown a failure rate of >25% of total hip replacement at 13 years followup.25 The prostheses needed for surgery in younger patients are also more expensive. This is perhaps the reason patients in our study sought us for an alternative to hip replacement.

The AVN had healed in all of these patients. Mean duration since onset was 25 months (range 13-48 months). The mean age of these patients was 29 years (range 19-37 years) which is certainly not the best age to perform a Total Hip Replacement. All of these patients had a large cam lesion [Figure 3] with a large extruded portion of femoral head occupying more than one third the femoral head circumference in all cases. Osteochodroplasty was sufficient to restore some sphericity in 6 of the 8 patients. Two of these patients had intraarticular wedge resection osteotomies. We found that the extruded portion of the femoral head was covered with reasonably good articular cartilage as was the medial portion of the femoral head. The portion under the lateral acetabular lip was depressed with the loss of cartilage. This central portion was excised in a wedge shaped manner, and the lateral and medial ends were brought together and coapted to restore some sphericity. The two cases in our series have produced an excellent result with HHS more than 90 after a followup of 26 and 59 months.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

X-ray left hip joint anteroposterior view showing (a) severe avascular necrosis with a saddle shaped head with a large extruded chunk anterolaterally after 2 years fracture neck femur. Range of motion only 60° of flexion. Severe pain. Harris hip score is 39. (b) Lateral X-ray showing loss of sphericity and extrusion of head anteriorly. Saddle shaped depression is also seen in the centre. (c) After the safe surgical exposure, the head is dislocated with the hip in external rotation. The central depression area with severe damage is seen. The medial portion of the head and the lateral extruded portion have reasonably good cartilage cover. (d) The central depressed portion is resected as a trapezoidal wedge. Part on left is extruded portion. The inner cut edges reveal bleeding signifying intact vascularity and efficacy of the safe surgical approach in preserving blood circulation. (e) The two portions of the head are coapted, fixed with screws. Reasonable sphericity is achieved. (f) A reasonably spherical profile of the head is created. Trochanter healed without problems. Hip range of motion has increased to 90° flexion and 25° adduction and abduction each. Rotations were restored minimally after 12 months. At 2 years after surgery, Harris hip score is more than 95. No pain at all and limp is minimal. (g) Postoperative lateral X-ray shows loss of the anterior bump and a reasonably spherical shape which permits flexion to almost 110° and no impingement in adduction-internal rotation.

The improvement in the pain parameters of patients with AVN has been significant. The mean followup of patients in this subgroup has been 23.1 months (range 6–55 months). The mean difference in the HHS has been 36.88 (range 11–56.1). Only 2 of the 8 had a difference in HHS of <20. While these are certainly very early results, they are certainly promising.

We did not have access to sophisticated instrumentation like laser Doppler flowmetry26 to check intact vascularity of the femoral head during the surgery in the dislocated state. There was active bleeding from the raw surfaces of the femoral head/neck in all of our patients. None has had any increase in pain signifying onset of secondary AVN. There have been no adverse X-ray changes at last followup. The treatment of the acetabular rim trimming and labral debridement and reattachment17 has been done in only one of our cases and that too inadequately. We submit that the osteochondroplasty has an easier learning curve, the acetabular procedures will need more expertise to prove successful. Hence, this study has focused on our experience treating the cam impingement.

In comparison to arthroscopy28 of the hip, surgical dislocation does not require any expensive or special instruments or operation table at all. It also allows a more comprehensive assessment of dynamic impingement conflict. It is also useful when any subtrochanteric osteotomy is contemplated, when impingement of the hip is located posterior to the retinacular vessels or when the entire acetabulum rim needs to be addressed.

The limitations of this study are the small number of patients and lesser duration of followup. However, the early results show promise and considering the mean age of patients in this group is only 28.8 years; any surgery that postpones joint replacement should be considered worth trying. Unfortunately, none of our patients has agreed to have an MRI scan postoperatively due to cost constraints as this could confirm the presence or absence of an iatrogenic loss of vascularity.27 Peters et al.29 described early results of open treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in their patients, in which 9 of their patients had a followup of <18 months.

Surgical hip dislocation offers possibility of performing intraarticular surgeries to overcome impingement and prolong the life of these hips.

Footnotes

Source of Support: Nil

Conflict of Interest: None.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lavigne M, Parvizi J, Beck M, Siebenrock KA, Ganz R, Leunig M. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: Part I. Techniques of joint preserving surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:61–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, Ganz K, Krügel N, Berlemann U. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1119–24. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b8.11964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gautier E, Ganz K, Krügel N, Gill T, Ganz R. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:679–83. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b5.10426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ito K, Minka MA, 2nd, Leunig M, Werlen S, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:171–6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b2.11092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:556–60. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b4.12014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Nötzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: A cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003:112–20. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000096804.78689.c2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaulé PE, Kim YJ, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ, et al. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 4):47–66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Byrd JW. Evaluation of the hip: History and physical examination. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2007;2:231–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yen YM, Kocher MS. Clinical and radiographic diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(Suppl 1):S112–20. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318288b450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peters CL, Erickson JA. Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement with surgical dislocation and débridement in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1735–41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Beaulé PE, Le Duff MJ, Zaragoza E. Quality of life following femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty for femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:773–9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Leunig M, Ganz R. Relative neck lengthening and intracapital osteotomy for severe Perthes and Perthes-like deformities. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2011;69(Suppl 1):S62–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ganz R, Huff TW, Leunig M. Extended retinacular soft-tissue flap for intraarticular hip surgery: Surgical technique, indications, and results of application. Instr Course Lect. 2009;58:241–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mont MA, Jones LC, Hungerford DS. Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Ten years later. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1117–32. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ilizarov GA. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1992. Transosseous Osteosynthesis. Theoretical and Clinical Aspects of Regeneration and Growth of Tissue. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Paley D. The treatment of femoral head deformity and coxa magna by the Ganz femoral head reduction osteotomy. Orthop Clin North Am. 2011;42:389–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2011.04.006. viii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Espinosa N, Rothenfluh DA, Beck M, Ganz R, Leunig M. Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement: Preliminary results of labral refixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:925–35. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Neumann M, Cui Q, Siebenrock KA, Beck M. Impingement-free hip motion: The ‘normal’ angle alpha after osteochondroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:699–703. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0616-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kumar R, Aggarwal A. Femoroacetabular impingement and risk factors: A study of 50 cases. Orthop Surg. 2011;3:236–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2011.00157.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Malhotra R, Kannan A, Kancherla R, Khatri D, Kumar V. Femoral head-neck offset in the Indian population: A CT based study. Indian J Orthop. 2012;46:212–5. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.93681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Madhuri V, Dutt V, Samuel K, Gahukamble AD. Intra-operative femoral head vascularity assessment: An innovative and simple technique. Indian J Orthop. 2011;45:231–5. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.80041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Naranje S, Shamshery P, Yadav CS, Gupta V, Nag HL. Digastric trochanteric flip osteotomy and surgical dislocation of hip in the management of acetabular fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:93–101. doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-0873-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Joseph B, Varghese G, Mulpuri K, Narasimha Rao K, Nair NS. Natural evolution of Perthes disease: A study of 610 children under 12 years of age at disease onset. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23:590–600. doi: 10.1097/00004694-200309000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.ISHKS Registry. [Last accessed on 2014 Feb 25]. Available from: http://www.ishks.com/pdf/charts.pdf .
  • 25.Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Söderman P. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A(Suppl 2):2–20. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200200002-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nötzli HP, Siebenrock KA, Hempfing A, Ramseier LE, Ganz R. Perfusion of the femoral head during surgical dislocation of the hip. Monitoring by laser Doppler flowmetry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:300–4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b2.12146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Freccero DM, Providence B, Berkowitz MJ, Lee GY. Postoperative assessment of vascularity of the femoral head after surgical hip dislocation. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:689–92. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Papalia R, Del Buono A, Franceschi F, Marinozzi A, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome management: Arthroscopy or open surgery? Int Orthop. 2012;36:903–14. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1443-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Peters CL, Schabel K, Anderson L, Erickson J. Open treatment of femoroacetabular impingement is associated with clinical improvement and low complication rate at short-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:504–10. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1152-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Orthopaedics are provided here courtesy of Indian Orthopaedic Association

RESOURCES