Abstract
Polarizing nuclear spins is of fundamental importance in biology, chemistry and physics. Methods for hyperpolarizing 13C nuclei from free electrons in bulk usually demand operation at cryogenic temperatures. Room temperature approaches targeting diamonds with nitrogen-vacancy centres could alleviate this need; however, hitherto proposed strategies lack generality as they demand stringent conditions on the strength and/or alignment of the magnetic field. We report here an approach for achieving efficient electron-13C spin-alignment transfers, compatible with a broad range of magnetic field strengths and field orientations with respect to the diamond crystal. This versatility results from combining coherent microwave- and incoherent laser-induced transitions between selected energy states of the coupled electron–nuclear spin manifold. 13C-detected nuclear magnetic resonance experiments demonstrate that this hyperpolarization can be transferred via first-shell or via distant 13Cs throughout the nuclear bulk ensemble. This method opens new perspectives for applications of diamond nitrogen-vacancy centres in nuclear magnetic resonance, and in quantum information processing.
Hyperpolarization of nuclear spins for enhancing the sensitivity of magnetic resonance can typically be achieved at low temperatures. Here, the authors demonstrate room-temperature polarization of 13C derived from optically pumped electrons of nitrogen vacancies in diamonds with arbitrary orientations.
Nuclear spins are central actors in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and imaging (MRI), providing important information at the molecular, micro- and mesoscopic levels for a wide variety of physical, chemical and biological processes1,2. Owing to their long relaxation times, nuclear spins are also promising vehicles for storing and manipulating quantum information, making them useful resources for potential quantum devices that extend the limits of classical computers3,4,5. Many of these uses derive from the weakness of nuclear spin interactions, making NMR methods remarkably noninvasive but also the observation of NMR signals challenging and characterized by intrinsically low signal-to-noise ratios. Dynamic nuclear polarization6,7,8 can bypass these limitations by transferring spin polarization from electrons to nuclei; for this process to be even more efficient cryogenic temperature operations are usually required9,10,11, leading to nuclear polarization enhancements encompassing several orders of magnitude. Electronic spins in nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centres are also promising alternatives for polarizing nuclear spins at room temperature conditions12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. Hitherto proposed electron-to-nuclear polarization transfer methods, however, have so far demanded finely tuned energy-matching conditions, both in terms of field strength and of its orientation with respect to the diamond crystal to perform efficiently. These prerequisites pose an obstacle for utilizing these methods in generic applications, including the use of diamond powders as tracers in biological MRI injection studies20,21,22, or as sources to hyperpolarize nuclei outside the diamond in NMR-based analyses23. It is hereby shown that these demands for achieving a robust electron-to-nuclear polarization transfer can be relaxed by the inclusion of incoherent processes24,25. The method hereby proposed includes a continuous microwave (MW) irradiation that coherently addresses the 0↔−1 (or +1) S=1 electronic spin transition while exploiting the asymmetry of the electron–nucleus hyperfine (HF) interaction imposed by the spin-1 nature of the NV centre26,27,28,29. This selective MW addressing is combined with the incoherent spin repopulation effects introduced by the optical pumping process30,31 to produce an imbalance between the populations of the coupled nuclear spins. This achievement of steady-state 13C polarization is here demonstrated over a range of magnetic field strengths and orientations as well as of electron–nuclear HF interactions, both in optical studies of single NV centres and in shuttled NMR measurements of bulk samples. Moreover, by exploiting the versatility of this new approach, light is shed on the role played by HF-imposed spin–diffusion barriers in the achievement of bulk nuclear spin hyperpolarization.
Results
The MW-driven-relaxation-aided polarization transfer scheme
Figure 1a defines the relevant system and active interactions that will be used to introduce our polarization transfer proposal. The system involves a single NV S=1 spin exhibiting a ground-state zero-field splitting D0=2.87 GHz. This electronic spin is coupled to nearby or distant 13C nuclear spins (I=1/2) through HF interactions and can be optically pumped to populate the electronic ms=0 level30,31. The application of a weak static magnetic field induces an additional splitting of the electronic/nuclear states, leading to the energy-level diagram in Fig. 1b. Our scenario assumes a selective MW irradiation that solely addresses the electron spin transitions, allowing one to treat the system as a four-level manifold (Fig. 1b). The nuclear spin components of the eigenstates associated with ms=0 ( and ) and ms=−1 ( and ) have different quantization axes because of the asymmetry imposed by a HF interaction that is absent if the electron state is ms=0 and present if ms=−1 (refs 26, 27, 28, 29). As further discussed in Methods and Supplementary Note 1, the corresponding eigenenergies exhibit splittings δ and Δ for the 0 and −1 manifolds, respectively. Notice that this asymmetry is due to the S=1 nature of the NV centre, and not due to particular details of couplings within the sample. These differences in level splitting and in quantization axes among nuclear spins that are initially unpolarized are here exploited to hyperpolarize them.
Different polarization transfer routes can be activated by irradiating this HF-coupled system. We discriminate these depending on the relative MW field strength Ω vis-a-vis the energy splittings δ and Δ, determining which eigenstates will participate in the dynamics. In the selective regime (Fig. 1c), the MW-induced transitions involve solely two directly addressed eigenstates. Therefore, the population of a third, non-addressed state associated with the ms=0 manifold grows systematically as driven by the laser-induced relaxation processes. This generates an imbalance between the and populations, equivalent to a nuclear polarization whose direction is defined by the ms=0 eigenstate manifold. As the MW power increases, a Λ-regime where transitions are induced among three eigenstates29 is reached (Fig. 1c). We describe this regime in a basis set ; here is a dark state for the MW in the sense that , and is a bright state that is addressed by the MW. Owing to the different HF properties associated with ms=0 and ms=−1, is an eigenstate but and are not, and therefore they oscillate at an effective nuclear Larmor frequency δ. As further detailed in Methods and in Supplementary Note 1, this precession takes place around an effective field defined by the quantization axis of the states. This field is given by the nuclear Zeeman axis if the non-secular terms of the HF coupling can be disregarded; if this is not possible, a second-order perturbation approach can be used to account for the Hamiltonian determining the effective precession field (see Supplementary Figs 1–4). The combined action of this nuclear precession, the MW irradiation and the laser-driven relaxation results in a redistribution of the initial populations over the three-level system, biasing the bright nuclear-state population, over its dark counterpart. For the example in Fig. 1c, a net nuclear magnetization pointing along the quantization axis, defined at weak fields by the spin's HF coupling to ms=−1, is then obtained. Finally, as the MW power is further increased, a broadband regime where the electron state is flipped without regards to the nuclear spin state is reached; in such an instance no nuclear polarization enrichment is predicted.
Nuclear hyperpolarization in the vicinity of the NV centre
To demonstrate these features, the local 13C polarization achieved via this HF-mediated polarization transfer was probed by optically detected magnetic resonance experiments on a single NV centre coupled to a first-shell 13C nuclear spin, characterized by a strong HF coupling Δ≈130 MHz (refs 26, 29). 13C polarization was measured on a crystal lattice rotated on purpose away from the external magnetic field by arbitrary Azimuthal and polar angles. The electron spin state was initialized to the ms=0 state by laser light and simultaneously irradiated with MWs for 30 μs. The eigenstate populations were then optically measured by monitoring the fluorecense emited by the NV electronic transitions, as a function of the MW frequency ω over a range covering the various transition frequencies (Fig. 2; see Methods, Supplementary Notes 2–4 and Supplementary Figs 5–8 for further details). Two MW powers were used in these experiments, corresponding to the selective and Λ-regimes shown in Fig. 1. For the selective regime, a 13C hyperpolarization pointing along the or directions defined by the ms=0 eigenstate manifold is reached, depending on the MW irradiation frequency. For the Λ-regime, nuclear hyperpolarization is also reached but now aligned along an axis defined by the nuclear eigenstates in the ms=−1 manifold. The double-peak pattern of the eigenstate population and 13C polarization spectra is characteristic of the selective regime. These two 13C spin alignment maxima arise when the MW is on resonance with the transition frequencies, leading to opposite nuclear polarization directions. By contrast, in the Λ-regime, a single 13C spin alignment peak centred between the transition frequencies is observed, evidencing that these two transitions are affected by the MW. In such a case the initial populations of the states are transferred to populate , leading to a nuclear spin alignment defined by the nuclear quantization axis.
Bulk hyperpolarization at variable fields and orientations
The polarized NV centre is embedded in a network of dipole–dipole-interacting nuclear spins, allowing an eventual propagation of the hyperpolarization throughout the nuclear bulk ensemble (Fig. 1a). Achieving an effective 13C polarization enhancement throughout an entire diamond could have important practical NMR and MRI consequences as the source of polarization for samples in contact with the diamond, as well as for tracing purposes. Consequently, we investigated whether distant 13C spins can benefit from the polarization transfer mechanisms observed in Fig. 2 at a local level. The bulk macroscopic 13C magnetization was directly measured by mechanically shuttling the diamond from low fields, where MW and laser fields were applied to accomplish the electron–nuclear polarization transfer, into a 4.7-T magnet enabling bulk 13C NMR detection (Fig. 3a,b). Figure 3c presents results arising from a typical experiment, showing the dependence of the ensemble 13C magnetization on the MW frequency ω. For consistency, measurements were carried out with the polarizing B0 field aligned along one of the NV centre orientations, meaning that the remaining three orientations of the crystal form an angle of ≈109° away from the field direction. The nuclear polarization spectrum (Fig. 3c) shows two regions of enhancement, corresponding to the aligned and non-aligned orientations of the NV defects. Both regions show similar patterns of multiple positive and negative peaks, corresponding to different HF couplings and MW-induced transitions. Both 13C patterns contain major central peaks, and minor outer peaks detuned by ≈±60 MHz from their centres. The central peaks correspond to bulk 13C nuclei being hyperpolarized via 20-MHz HF interactions, that is, via 13C spins positioned at or beyond the NV's second shell27,28. The outer peaks also correspond to bulk 13C polarization, but arriving this time via first-shell 13Cs whose HF splitting is ≈130 MHz (refs 26, 29). In this instance, the bulk 13C magnetization exhibits a sign-flip pattern characteristic of the selective regime, akin to the local 13C polarization pattern shown in Fig. 2c, although these are bulk 13C resonances detected on the whole diamond, and not single-spin measurements. This demonstrates that 13C ensemble hyperpolarization can be derived via either nuclear–nuclear dipole couplings involving distant spins to the electron, or via first-shell 13C spins. The latter is a remarkable fact, given that in this case the build-up of bulk polarization needs to overcome the >60-MHz detuning characterizing the first-shell sites acting as polarization transfer bridgehead. The timescales that are then needed to achieve a bulk polarization build-up, ∼30 s, are orders of magnitude longer than the first-shell electron-13C polarization transfer time (<ms, see Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Fig. 7). This difference in timescales explains how a low-concentration, highly detuned species such as the first-shell 13C suffices to polarize the bulk sample examined by the NMR experiments (see Supplementary Note 5 for a rough estimation of the number of polarized 13C). Figure 4 further demonstrates the versatility of the method to yield bulk nuclear hyperpolarization, as evidenced by the achievement of enhanced 13C NMR signals over a broad range of polarizing magnetic fields and of MW powers. Notice that the nuclear polarization reveals a systematic increase as a function of B0 (Fig. 4a), as well as a clear optimum for the MW power (Fig. 4b) consistent with a transition from a selective regime in which the polarization grows with MW power to a Λ-regime in which it decreases with the MW power (see inset and Supplementary Note 4). Interference effects between a hyperpolarization driven by an excited-state level anticrossing13,14,15 and the MW-induced transfer scheme introduced here are seen at fields of ∼50 mT. In contrast to the MW-induced transfer, the anticrossing-based technique requires that the electron/nuclear Zeeman energy detuning conditions be smaller than the dominant HF interaction. The relatively narrow range of magnetic field values compatible with this transfer scheme is thus in contrast to the MW-induced transfer processes, where matching requirements are relaxed as the MW frequency can be tuned to an array of electronic–nuclear frequency transitions (for example, Fig. 4a).
Discussion
A versatile method for hyperpolarizing nuclear spin ensembles at room temperature using NV centres in diamond was proposed and demonstrated. The method relies on the combined action of continuous laser light and MW irradiation, and exploits the asymmetries of the HF interaction imparted by the spin-1 nature of the NV centre. This allows us to transfer spin order from the electronic ms=0 state to the nuclei, by exploiting the evolution triggered on selectively irradiating transitions. Nuclear spin hyperpolarization is thus obtained for a broad range of magnetic field strengths and arbitrary field orientations with respect to the diamond lattice, as well as for a wide range of HF interactions. These principles may facilitate a number of applications. One entails facilitating the use of pre-polarized diamonds in NMR experiments owing to the ease with which NV electrons can be optically pumped by comparison with cryogenic-based high-field counterparts. This easing of the hyperpolarization conditions should also facilitate the use of these samples in multiscan acquisition of the kind desirable in in vivo MRI scans. Our scheme provides an approach for optically detected nanoscale NMR/MRI of polarized nuclear spin ensembles that complements methods based on spin noise thermal fluctuations23,32,33,34,35. The fact that the method works for different orientation and strengths of the magnetic field can be exploited for polarizing diamond powders, leading to an alternative route to NMR measurements that complements the ones based on thermal polarization. Further studies on the basis of frequency sweeps are in progress to evaluate the efficiency of the nuclear spin polarization process in powders at higher fields. Alternatively, approaching a zero magnetic field might be advantageous, since all orientations would then become nearly equivalent and addressable in a simultaneous manner. In addition to potential NMR/MRI uses, this method could be useful for dissipative nuclear-state preparation in ensemble quantum memories, for quantum information processing36,37,38,39. Hyperpolarizing nuclear spin ensembles in solid-state systems also provides a tool to study condensed matter and many-body physics phenomena of cold bodies, where quantum effects (for example, quantum phase transitions) are more sharply manifested40,41,42,43. The concepts here used might also find applicability in other kinds of cross-polarization scenarios, involving generic transfers between a spin-1 source coupled to other spins.
Besides demonstrating the method's capability at a local level, it was shown that nuclear hyperpolarization can be extended throughout the bulk ensemble by spin-diffusion—even when targeting first-shell nuclear spins strongly shifted by HF couplings. This provides a new tool for understanding the complex non-equilibrium dynamics of many-body systems, where a local polarization can be created in a controlled way and its spreading into the bulk be monitored44,45,46,47.
Methods
Single-crystal sample
For the single NV detection experiments the sample used was a commercially available, untreated, type IIa, electronic-grade natural abundance 13C diamond crystal (dimension: 2 × 2 × 0.3 mm3). For the NMR experiments, an isotopically enriched (10% 13C) type Ib high-pressure, high-temperature diamond was used. The enriched crystal was grown by the temperature gradient method at a pressure of 6 GPa and a temperature of 1,700 K from Ni-2 wt% Ti solvent using a powdered mixture of 13C-enriched and natural abundance graphic carbon. These samples were irradiated at room temperature (2 MeV, 10 h, total fluence 8 × 1017 e cm−2) and annealed (2 h, 1,000 °C). Subsequent examination using confocal laser microscopy confirmed that the two most abundant paramagnetic impurities consisted of electrically neutral single substitutional nitrogen atoms (P1), and charged nitrogen atoms next to a lattice vacancy forming an optically active colour centre (NV−). The concentrations of these impurities were both <5 p.p.m. (part-per-million). In both samples, we estimate a T1≈5 ms for the NV electron spin in the electronic ground state. Whereas single NV centre experiments on natural abundance 13C samples revealed a ≈2.5 μs (ref. 48), for the 13C-enriched crystal we estimate using optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) a ≈12 ns for the NV centre in the ground state at the polarizing fields. For the single NV centre experiments, a ≈20 μs was measured for the nuclear spin. In the 13C-enriched diamond crystal, bulk 13C T1 relaxation times ranged from 5 to 20 s depending on the magnetic field strength at the polarizing fields (1–100 mT). At the detection field B0=4.7 T used in the 13C bulk studies, T1 relaxation was >10 min and =160±50 μs.
System Hamiltonian
At room temperature, the NV centre energy-level structure exhibits an electronic triplet as the ground state (3A2)12,13,14. The quantum Hamiltonian of a single NV defect (S) and one 13C nucleus (I) can thus be described as . Here D0=2.87 GHz is the zero-field splitting term, γe and γn the electronic and nuclear gyromagnetic ratios, B is the magnetic field vector and A a HF tensor that depends on the specific NV and nearby 13C spin49. For simplicity, we consider first a magnetic field B aligned with the axis of the zero-field tensor D0 and the secular approximation . This Hamiltonian simplifies to , where the axis x was chosen such that Azy=0. The feature enabling the magnetization transfers illustrated in Fig. 1 is that in the ms=0 manifold the eigenstates have a nuclear component and exhibiting a nuclear Zeeman splitting δ=γnB0, whereas in the ms=−1 manifold the and nuclear components of the eigenstates are quantized on a different axis determined by the HF tensor for weak magnetic fields . For the states the eigenstate splitting δ may also depend on non-secular corrections of the HF coupling, which may also lead to an effective tilt of the nuclear spin quantization away from the magnetic field B (see Supplementary Figs 1 and 2). By contrast, the states are not significantly modified by the non-secular HF terms if , that is, on a condition far from the level anticrossings13,14,15 (we do not consider here the more complicated scenario when the level anticrossing conditions are fulfilled, see Supplementary Fig. 2 for further details). If the magnetic field is not aligned with the D0 tensor, the level structure discussed in Fig. 1 remains even if the definitions of and will change29; the crucial characteristic is that they will still have different quantization axes and different eigenstate splittings δ and Δ (see Supplementary Figs 3 and 4). For more details on the eigenstates, energy splittings and the participation of them on the polarization dynamics please refer to Supplementary Note 1.
Single NV optical set-up
The single NV detection was conducted on a home-built confocal microscope. Continuous wave green laser light (λ=532 nm) was switched by an acousto-optic modulator (Isomet, rise/fall times ≈30 ns) coupled into a single mode optical fibre and focused on the diamond sample by an oil-immersion microscope objective (Olympus, numerical aperture=1.35). The objective was placed on a three-axis piezo stage (Npoint) enabling a scan range of the x, y, z axes of 250 × 250 × 25 μm with a resolution of ∼1 nm. The emerging red fluorescence signal was focused into a single-photon counting module (Perkin-Elmer, dark count rate 100 counts s−1). To induce transitions within the ground-state triplet during the polarization and detection sequences, MW fields were produced by two copper wires attached to the diamond (diameter ∼50 μm). During the hyperpolarization process, the laser intensity was reduced to ∼5% of its saturation intensity (Psat∼1 mW at the objective's back) to avoid light-induced nuclear-state depopulation12,50 (see Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Fig. 8).
Populations and polarization in single NV centre experiments
The eigenstates' populations were obtained by performing a series of complementary measurements involving selective MW irradiation on eigenstate-specific transition frequencies, followed by an optical readout of the NV centre populations (see Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 5 for further details). With these selective experiments and a linear system of equations, the populations of the three active eigenstates ( and ) could be reconstructed. To perform these calculations, the fluorescence levels at the end of the different polarization sequences were measured, and properly normalized by executing the schemes with and without MW irradiation (Supplementary Fig. 6). In the selective regime, the MW Rabi frequency Ω=1.4 MHz was lower than the HF splitting with the 14N nuclear spin (2.16 MHz)51. Therefore, to address the latter's three nuclear spin orientations simultaneously, the MW source was further modulated to create the three corresponding frequencies spaced by 2.16 MHz (see Supplementary Note 3). The wiggles in Fig. 2a–c are consequence of this irradiation mechanism. The magnetic field strength and orientation were optimized to be large enough for allowing selective excitation independent of the host 14N nuclear spin (δ>4–5 MHz), and small enough to allow mutual excitation (that is, Λ-regime) with reasonable MW power (δ<10 MHz). The static and MW magnetic fields and the laser-pumping rate were calibrated from ODMR spectra, and from time-resolved measurements of the Rabi oscillations and the laser-pumping evolution. The values of the static and MW fields are given in the caption to Fig. 2, while the optical pumping rate was 1/3 μs−1 and had a pumping efficiency of ≈90%. The curves in Fig. 2b,c,e,f were obtained by solving the spins' quantum evolution based on a quantum master equation involving the total six-level model of a single NV centre coupled to a single 13C nuclear spin, as further detailed in Supplementary Note 2. The bare system Hamiltonian used was introduced in the Methods section: System Hamiltonian (for further details see Supplementary Note 1); simulations were performed on the basis of this Hamiltonian in the rotating frame of the MW irradiation, with frequency parameters as discussed in the main text. The pumping process was modelled as a non-Hermitian relaxation process using a Lindblad form reflecting the incoherent transition from the ms=±1 states to the ms=0 state, and using the experimentally determined pumping rate 1/3 μs−1 as the relaxation rate. The HF tensor of the first-shell 13C spin was taken from ref. 29 (see Supplementary equation (16)). For the selective regime, the 14N HF splitting was considered phenomenologically as an ensemble superposition of the signal coming from the three frequencies used in the MW irradiation.
Set-up for the ensemble-detected nuclear spin polarization experiments
In a single-crystal diamond, NV centres can be separated into subensembles corresponding to four magnetically inequivalent orientations. The diamond sample used for the optically pumped NMR measurements had a polished [100] surface orientation. The sample was rotated in B0 until one of the NV centre orientations was aligned to the magnetic field, while the three remaining subensembles were degenerate at an angle of ∼109° forming the non-aligned orientations. The weak magnetic field in these experiments (B0=0–100 mT) was provided by the stray field of the superconducting magnet used to perform the bulk high-field NMR measurements, connected by a compensating low-field coil. The laser light was produced by a diode-pumped solid-state laser (Verdi-V10, λ=532 nm) coupled into an optic fibre and then focused to either partially or fully illuminate the diamond crystals. To avoid excessive heating during the optical pumping, the sample was immersed into a transparent water-filled flask and vented with pressurized air to keep the temperature constant. For the application of continuous wave MW irradiation, radio- and MW signals from a broadband frequency synthesizer were amplified by up to +30 dB for frequencies ω>600 MHz and up to +43 dB for ω<600 MHz. These amplified signals were then fed into a Helmholtz coil electronic circuit tuned to 50 Ω.
The bulk 13C experiments began with a combined laser and MW irradiation (10–30 s) to optically initialize the electronic spins and induce a transfer of the ensuing hyperpolarization from the electronic to the nuclear spins. The sample was then rapidly (<0.5 s) shuttled from the polarizing field B0 to the sweet spot of the high-field (4.7 T) NMR magnet, where the nuclear spins were subject to a pulsed detection using an NMR probe with a Helmholtz coil configuration tuned to 50.55 MHz. The observed NMR signal consists of a single optically enhanced 13C spectral line resonating at ca. 60 p.p.m. with a linewidth between 1 (natural abundance) and 3 kHz (10% enriched crystal). The sample then returned to the polarizing field for a repeated cycle of optical pumping and MW irradiation for the purpose of signal averaging.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Álvarez, G. A. et al. Local and bulk 13C hyperpolarization innitrogen-vacancy-centred diamonds at variable fields and orientations. Nat. Commun. 6:8456 doi: 10.1038/ncomms9456 (2015).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Shimon Vega, Gershon Kurizki and Analia Zwick for stimulating discussions. We thank Fedor Jelezko and his group for guiding in constructing the single NV-centre confocal microscope, and for obtaining the type IIa sample. This work was supported by the DIP Project 710907, ERC Advanced Grant # 246754, the Kimmel Institute for Magnetic Resonance, IMOD, the Israel Science Foundation Grant 1142/13, the generosity of the Perlman Family Foundation, JST and JSPS KAKENHI (No.26246001). G.A.A. acknowledges the support of the European Commission under the Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship for career Development Grant No. PIEF-GA-2012-328605.
Footnotes
Author contributions G.A.A., R.F. and L.F. conceived the polarization transfer scheme. G.A.A., C.O.B., R.F., P.L. and L.F. designed the experimental approaches. P.L. and R.F. implemented and performed the single-spin experiments and analysed their data. C.O.B. and R.F. implemented the hardware set-up for the bulk-NMR experiments, and G.A.A. and C.O.B. performed them, including data processing. G.A.A. and R.F. performed the numerical simulations. G.A.A., C.O.B., R.F., P.L. and L.F. analysed and interpreted the data. H.K, S.O. and J.I. fabricated the NV centres in enriched diamond sample. G.A.A., C.O.B., R.F. and L.F. wrote the manuscript. All authors commented on the manuscript and contributed to discussions of its results.
References
- Abragam A. Principles of Nuclear Magnetism Oxford University Press (1961) . [Google Scholar]
- Callaghan P. T. Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy Oxford University Press (1993) . [Google Scholar]
- Gershenfeld N. A. & Chuang I. L. Bulk spin-resonance quantum computation. Science 275, 350–356 (1997) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kane B. E. A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer. Nature (London) 393, 133–137 (1998) . [Google Scholar]
- Georgescu I., Ashhab S. & Nori F. Quantum simulation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153–185 (2014) . [Google Scholar]
- Abragam A. & Goldman M. Principles of dynamic nuclear polarisation. Rep. Prog. Phys. 41, 395–467 (1978) . [Google Scholar]
- Ardenkjær-Larsen J. H. et al. Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of>10,000 times in liquid-state NMR. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 10158–10163 (2003) . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Griesinger C. et al. Dynamic nuclear polarization at high magnetic fields in liquids. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 64, 4–28 (2012) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Golman K., Zandt R. i. t. & Thaning M. Real-time metabolic imaging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11270–11275 (2006) . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joo C.-G., Hu K.-N., Bryant J. A. & Griffin R. G. In situ temperature jump high-frequency dynamic nuclear polarization experiments: Enhanced sensitivity in liquid-state NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 9428–9432 (2006) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- King J. P., Coles P. J. & Reimer J. A. Optical polarization of 13C nuclei in diamond through nitrogen vacancy centers. Phys. Rev. B 81, 073201 (2010) . [Google Scholar]
- Dutt M. V. G. et al. Quantum register based on individual electronic and nuclear spin qubits in diamond. Science 316, 1312–1316 (2007) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacques V. et al. Dynamic polarization of single nuclear spins by optical pumping of nitrogen-vacancy color centers in diamond at room temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 057403 (2009) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischer R. et al. Bulk nuclear polarization enhanced at room temperature by optical pumping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 057601 (2013) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang H.-J. et al. Sensitive magnetic control of ensemble nuclear spin hyperpolarization in diamond. Nat. Commun. 4, 1940 (2013) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laraoui A. & Meriles C. A. Approach to dark spin cooling in a diamond nanocrystal. ACS Nano 7, 3403–3410 (2013) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pagliero D., Laraoui A., Henshaw J. D. & Meriles C. A. Recursive polarization of nuclear spins in diamond at arbitrary magnetic fields. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 242402 (2014) . [Google Scholar]
- King J. P. et al. Room-temperature in situ nuclear spin hyperpolarization from optically-pumped nitrogen vacancy centers in diamond. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.02897 (2015) . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Chen Q., Schwarz I., Jelezko F., Retzker A. & Plenio M. B. Optical hyperpolarization of 13C nuclear spins in nanodiamond ensembles. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.02368 (2015) .
- Krueger A. New carbon materials: biological applications of functionalized nanodiamond materials. Chem. Eur. J. 14, 1382–1390 (2008) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McGuinness L. P. et al. Quantum measurement and orientation tracking of fluorescent nanodiamonds inside living cells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 358–363 (2011) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kucsko G. et al. Nanometre-scale thermometry in a living cell. Nature 500, 54–58 (2013) . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abrams D., Trusheim M. E., Englund D. R., Shattuck M. D. & Meriles C. A. Dynamic nuclear spin polarization of liquids and gases in contact with nanostructured diamond. Nano Lett. 14, 2471–2478 (2014) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erez N., Gordon G., Nest M. & Kurizki G. Thermodynamic control by frequent quantum measurements. Nature 452, 724–727 (2008) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Álvarez G. A., Rao D. D. B., Frydman L. & Kurizki G. Zeno and anti-zeno polarization control of spin ensembles by induced dephasing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 160401 (2010) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Felton S. et al. Hyperfine interaction in the ground state of the negatively charged nitrogen vacancy center in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 79, 075203 (2009) . [Google Scholar]
- Smeltzer B., Childress L. & Gali A. 13C hyperfine interactions in the nitrogen-vacancy centre in diamond. New J. Phys. 13, 025021 (2011) . [Google Scholar]
- Dréau A., Maze J.-R., Lesik M., Roch J.-F. & Jacques V. High-resolution spectroscopy of single NV defects coupled with nearby 13C nuclear spins in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 85, 134107 (2012) . [Google Scholar]
- Shim J. H. et al. Characterization of hyperfine interaction between single electron and single nuclear spins in diamond assisted by quantum beat from the nuclear spin. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.0257 (2013) .
- Gruber A. et al. Scanning confocal optical microscopy and magnetic resonance on single defect centers. Science 276, 2012–2014 (1997) . [Google Scholar]
- Jelezko F., Gaebel T., Popa I., Gruber A. & Wrachtrup J. Observation of coherent oscillations in a single electron spin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 076401 (2004) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mamin H. J. et al. Nanoscale nuclear magnetic resonance with a nitrogen-vacancy spin sensor. Science 339, 557–560 (2013) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Staudacher T. et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy on a (5-nanometer)3 sample volume. Science 339, 561–563 (2013) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loretz M., Pezzagna S., Meijer J. & Degen C. L. Nanoscale nuclear magnetic resonance with a 1.9-nm-deep nitrogen-vacancy sensor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 033102 (2014) . [Google Scholar]
- Sushkov A. O. et al. Magnetic resonance detection of individual proton spins using quantum reporters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 197601 (2014) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Plenio M., Huelga S., Beige A. & Knight P. Cavity loss induced generation of entangled atoms. Phys. Rev. A 59, 2468–2475 (1999) . [Google Scholar]
- Plenio M. & Huelga S. Entangled light from white noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 197901 (2002) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verstraete F., Wolf M. M. & Ignacio Cirac J. Quantum computation and quantum-state engineering driven by dissipation. Nat. Phys. 5, 633–636 (2009) . [Google Scholar]
- Lin Y. et al. Dissipative production of a maximally entangled steady state of two quantum bits. Nature 504, 415–418 (2013) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ronnow H. M. et al. Quantum phase transition of a magnet in a spin bath. Science 308, 389–392 (2005) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bloch I., Dalibard J. & Zwerger W. Many-body physics with ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885–964 (2008) . [Google Scholar]
- Burzurí E. et al. Magnetic dipolar ordering and quantum phase transition in an Fe8 molecular magnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 097203 (2011) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kraemer C. et al. Dipolar antiferromagnetism and quantum criticality in LiErF4. Science 336, 1416–1419 (2012) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Álvarez G. A. & Suter D. NMR quantum simulation of localization effects induced by decoherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 230403 (2010) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richerme P. et al. Non-local propagation of correlations in quantum systems with long-range interactions. Nature 511, 198–201 (2014) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jurcevic P. et al. Quasiparticle engineering and entanglement propagation in a quantum many-body system. Nature 511, 202–205 (2014) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Álvarez G. A., Suter D. & Kaiser R. Localization-delocalization transition in the dynamics of dipolar-coupled nuclear spins. Science 349, 846–848 (2015) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Balasubramanian G. et al. Ultralong spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond. Nat. Mater. 8, 383–387 (2009) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slichter C. Principles of Magnetic Resonance Springer (1996) . [Google Scholar]
- Jiang L. et al. Coherence of an optically illuminated single nuclear spin qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 073001 (2008) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steiner M., Neumann P., Beck J., Jelezko F. & Wrachtrup J. Universal enhancement of the optical readout fidelity of single electron spins at nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 81, 035205 (2010) . [Google Scholar]
- Fuchs G. D., Falk A. L., Dobrovitski V. V. & Awschalom D. D. Spin coherence during optical excitation of a single nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 157602 (2012) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.