Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Oct 9;5:15143. doi: 10.1038/srep15143

Two successive magneto-structural transformations and their relation to enhanced magnetocaloric effect for Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1 Heusler alloy

Zhe Li 1,a, Kun Xu 1, Yuanlei Zhang 1, Chang Tao 1, Dong Zheng 2, Chao Jing 2
PMCID: PMC4598732  PMID: 26450663

Abstract

In the present work, two successive magneto-structural transformations (MSTs) consisting of martensitic and intermartensitic transitions have been observed in polycrystalline Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1 Heusler alloy. Benefiting from the additional latent heat contributed from intermediate phase, this alloy exhibits a large transition entropy change ΔStr with the value of ~27 J/kg K. Moreover, the magnetocaloric effect (MCE) has been also evaluated in terms of Maxwell relation. For a magnetic field change of 30 kOe, it was found that the calculated value of refrigeration capacity in Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1 attains to ~72 J/kg around room temperature, which significantly surpasses those obtained for many Ni-Mn based Heusler alloys in the same condition. Such an enhanced MCE can be ascribed to the fact that the isothermal entropy change ΔST is spread over a relatively wide temperature interval owing to existence of two successive MSTs for studied sample.

During the past decades, Ni-Mn based ferromagnetic shape memory alloys (FSMAs) have been attracted much attention because of their multiplicity of functional properties like magnetic shape memory effect (MSME)1,2, magnetocaloric effect (MCE)3,4,5 and magnetoresistence (MR)6,7, etc. Among these FSMAs, stoichiometric Ni2MnGa is the most representative, which undergoes two separate transformations containing a magnetic transition at Inline graphic and a first-order martensitic transition (MT) at Inline graphic8. At the temperature located between TC and TM, Ni2MnGa is ferromagnetic (FM) and has a cubic L21-type austenitic structure. Upon cooling from TM, it would transform to a tetragonal martensitic structure maintaining its FM ordering with high magnetocrystalline anisotropy. Besides the MT, a first-order intermartensitic transition (IMT) between the modulated and the unmodulated martensite, caused by changes in composition, temperature and external stress, has been also extensively investigated in Ni-Mn-Ga alloys9,10,11,12,13,14. In comparison to MT, the IMT usually occurs at a much lower temperature, resulting in two entirely separated transformations. Currently, the IMT associated with the change of magnetization has been continuously reported in a new type of FSMAs, such as Ni-Mn-In-Sb15, Ni-Co-Mn-Sn16,17 and Ni-Cu-Mn-Sn18. For these alloys, the IMT and MT were mostly found to be closing upon each other and hence form two successive magneto-structural transformations16,17,18. Owing to the sequent magneto-structural couplings, such a kind of the multiple MSTs, compared with the intermediate phase in Ni-Mn-Ga alloys, can show more abnormal physical properties16,17.

As is well known, both TC and TM for Ni-Mn-Ga alloys are particularly sensitive to their composition. Previous experimental studies conformed that partial substitution of Ni with Mn can decrease TC and increase TM in Ni50+xMn25−xGa2519,20,21. In some particular compositions, the magnetic transition would happen to coincide to MT. Such a coincidence also gives rise to the MST from paramagnetic (PM) austenitic phase to FM martensitic phase near room temperature. This individual behavior is similar to that observed in some giant magnetocaloric materials22,23,24 and Ni2In-type hexagonal compounds25,26,27. It makes these particular alloys prospectively apply to magnetic refrigeration28,29,30,31,32,33. Very recently, a giant MCE related to magneto-multistructural transformation was reported in annealed Ni52Mn26Ga22 ribbon above room temperature, which is due to existence of an intermediate phase involving different modulated martensitic structures34. In the present work, very interestingly, two successive MSTs have been observed in Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1 Heusler alloy. Associated with such an exotic behavior, an enhanced MCE around room temperature has been obtained for a magnetic field change of 30 kOe.

Results

Thermal magnetization and thermal strain

The temperature dependence of magnetization for Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1, during cooling and heating, is shown in Fig. 1. For the sample on cooling, an abrupt change of magnetization appears in the vicinity of TM, which corresponds to a direct MT. With further lowering temperature around TIM, the magnetization shows a nonlinear uptrend and gradually attains to a steady stage, which is attributed to a direct IMT. Between the cooling and heating process, there exists two obviously thermal hysteresis for both transformations, which are estimated as ΔTM = 10 K and ΔTIM = 8 K, respectively. Meanwhile, a similar jump can be also explored in the thermal strain curve near the same temperatures (see right upper panel of Fig. 1). All these findings clearly imply that each transitions are first order and they comprise two successive MSTs within the temperature range of 305 K ~ 335 K. Additionally, the characteristic temperatures of these transformations determined from dM/dT(T) curves (see left lower panel of Fig. 1) are equal to TM = 318 K, TIM = 313 K, TA = 328 K, and TIA = 321 K, where the TM, TIM, TA, and TIA denote the direct MT/IMT and the reverse MT/IMT equilibrium temperature, respectively.

Figure 1. Temperature dependence of magnetization M(T) for Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1 alloy on cooling and heating at magnetic field of 500 Oe.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Left lower panel shows the dM/dT(T) curves corresponding to these transformations. Right upper panel shows the strain as a function of temperature Δl/l(T) in the absence of magnetic field upon cooling.

Heat flow, specific heat and crystal structure of different martensitic phases

To further investigate the transforming behaviors, the heat flow data were collected for Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1 by continuous heating and cooling, as shown in Fig. 2. During cooling, the direct MT and IMT are accompanied with the well-defined peaks on the heat flow due to the latent heat of these transitions. During heating, the endothermic curve almost displays an identical feature, but it can be distinguished that the reverse IMT slightly weakens. From the inset of Fig. 2, it is conspicuous that the Cp(T) curve measured with cooling mode also displays two exothermic peaks, which are similar to those observed in heat flow data. Crucially, the corresponding temperatures of these peaks are in good agreement with the characteristic temperatures determined from the magnetic measurements (see Fig. 1), which provide an evidence on the occurrence of the two successive MSTs in present sample. According to previous experimental works10,12,13,14, the sequence of IMT observed in the cooling process is usually from a five-layered (5 M) to a seven-layered (7 M) modulated martensitic structure or from 7 M to non-modulated martensitic structure (L10). To clarify the sequence of IMT for Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1 alloy, Fig. 3 shows the x-ray diffraction pattern at room temperature. The reflections indicate that the sample crystallizes into the non-modulated tetragonal (L10) martensitic structure. The refinement result reveals that the sample possesses the lattice parameters with Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic. After heating the sample near the finish temperature of reverse MT (326 K), the obvious splitting of (222) peak suggests that the present sample is predominately in the 7 M modulated martensitic structure with small residual traces of non-modulated martensitic structure (see the inset of Fig. 3). Analogous structure (mixed martensitic phase) has also been reported in Ni2.14Mn0.84Ga1.02 caused by IMT12. Hence, such an experimental result directly proves that the IMT for studied sample should follow with the sequence of 7 M to L10 on cooling and the state returns with thermal hysteresis to the 7 M phase on heating.

Figure 2. Heat flow data measured by continuous heating and cooling for Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1 alloy.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The inset shows temperature dependence of specific heat Cp(T) during cooling for this sample.

Figure 3. X-ray diffraction pattern for Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1 alloy at room temperature.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Inset: X-ray diffraction pattern at 326 K for this sample directly heated from room temperature.

Transition entropy change, thermal cycles and Isothermal magnetization

For Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1 alloy, by using heat flow data, the calculated absolute latent heat, |ΔL|, contributed from two sequent transformations is ~8.6 kJ/kg upon cooling and ~8 kJ/kg upon heating, respectively. The small discrepancy in amounts can be ascribed to the presence of degenerative reverse IMT (see Fig. 2). However, it is worth noting that both values of ΔL are larger than that reported in Ni55Mn20Ga25 single crystal28, on account of the additional latent heat from the IMT. Furthermore, the entropy as a function of temperature computed by exothermic curve from heat flow data, as plotted in Fig. 4(a). One can notice that the transition entropy change (ΔStr) obtained during cooling amounts to ~27 J/kg K, which is comparable to those of giant magnetocaloric materials22,23,24. As shown in Fig. 4(b), more importantly, it highlights that the multiple transformations are found to be nicely reproducible after a number of thermal cycles, exhibiting an intrinsic nature. These results predict that the studied sample may be a promising candidate for magnetic refrigeration.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) The entropy as a function of temperature during the multiple transformations at zero fields in Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1 alloy. (b) Heat flow data of thermal cycling with 21 times around the multiple transformations for this sample.

In addition to a large ΔStr, another vital feature for magnetocaloric materials is the field-induced transformation. With this aim we carried out measurements of isothermal magnetization at selected temperatures for Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1, as shown in Fig. 5. Both of the representative hysteresis curves are presented at 305 K and 325 K between field-up and field-down courses, indicating a strong FM state of martensite and a magnetically inhomogeneous state coexisting in ferromagnetic and paramagnetic regions of austenite with the temperature close to transition point. At the mediate temperature of 321 K, interestingly, it can be clearly explored that the ascending branch shows a nonmonotonic tendency in the magnetizing process at an inflection point of about 7.5 kOe, which was determined as a peak value on the Inline graphic curve (see the inset of Fig. 5). In the subsequent demagnetizing stage, the descending branch manifests a typical FM feature accompanied with a distinct magnetic hysteresis, indicating that there only exists one-way field-induced MT. The same phenomenon was also observed in Ni-Mn-Ga with similar composition28,35. In general, the changes of phase volume fraction caused by isothermal magnetic field mainly rely on Inline graphic, which can be assessed by Clausius-Clapeyron (C-C) equation, Inline graphic. Utilizing the values of ΔM (~27.3 emu/g, see Fig. 5) and ΔStr for Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1, the calculated value of Inline graphic is only about 0.1 K/kOe. Therefore, the irreversible field-induced MT can be attributed to an insufficient magnetic field, which cannot overcome more thermal energy generated by phase boundary friction36. Despite the Inline graphic of Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1 is significantly lower than that in a great deal of metamagnetic materials2,5,22,23,24,25,26,27, we still deem that an enhanced MCE associated with two successive MSTs should be expected.

Figure 5. Isothermal magnetization curves for Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1 measured at selected temperatures.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Prior to measurements, the sample was first warmed in zero fields to pure austenite and then cooled to measuring temperature. The inset shows a peak value on the dM/dH(H) curve measured at 321 K. Arrows indicate the directions of magnetic field change.

Isothermal entropy change and refrigerant capacity

To confirm this point as mentioned above, we now turn our attention to discussion of MCE for Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1, as shown in Fig. 6. The inset of this figure depicts the M(T) curves measured at various magnetic fields upon cooling. It can be detected that the effect of magnetic field on the two successive MSTs is negligible except that the transformation regions shift towards higher temperature. The increasing rate is in well correspondence with the result calculated by C-C equation. Based on these M(T) curves, the isothermal entropy change (ΔST) during direct MST was calculated under different magnetic fields through the Maxwell relation Inline graphic(see Fig. 6). Due to the existence of intermediate phases for Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1, it can be found that the MCE occurs in the two steps around room temperature, corresponding to the MT and IMT, respectively, bringing about two sequent ΔST peaks with the same sign. These behaviors are analogous to that reported for high-pressure annealing Ni-Co-Mn-Sn alloys16,17. With increasing applied magnetic field, two sequent peaks move to higher temperatures and develop in amplitude simultaneously, which reflect the intrinsic nature of MCE during the multiple transformations. Moreover, the refrigerant capacity (RC), which is the other pivotal parameter for judging materials’ magnetocaloric capability, has been estimated by integrating the area under ΔST (T) curve from T1 to T2 (shade area in Fig. 6). In the case of present sample, although the value of ΔST is only ~11 J/kg K, the RC still achieves ~72 J/kg for the change of magnetic field from 0 to 30 kOe. Such a RC is strikingly higher than that in many Ni-Mn based Heusler alloys3,4,16,28,29,30,31,32,33,34 and comparable to some Ni2In hexagonal-type magnetocaloric compounds in the uniform condition37,38,39. This is attributed to be resulted from two successive MSTs, which can broaden the range of work temperature and the resulted MCE will thus be enhanced dramatically.

Figure 6. Temperature dependence of isothermal entropy change ΔST for Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1 alloy at different magnetic fields.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

The inset shows temperature dependence of magnetization under various magnetic fields for this sample.

Discussion

Up to date, a transformation from PM austenitic phase to FM martensitic phase has been developed in some materials like Ni-Mn based Heusler alloys19,20,21,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35 and Ni2In hexagonal-type compounds25,26,27,38,39, etc. Such a MST can be understood by the fact that the TC of martensitic phase may be higher than that the temperature of the MT occurred. In the case of our studied sample, as distinct from aforementioned materials, Figs. 1 and 2 indicate that it experiences two successive MSTs consisting of a MT (from PM to weak FM state) and an IMT (from weak FM to strong FM state). According to previous studies9,14,18, we consider that the origin of the multiple transformations could be related to chemical stress (change in composition) or twining stress. In contrast to similar transforming features reported in polycrystalline Ni-Mn-In-Sb15 and Ni-Cu-Mn-Sn18 as well as Ni-Mn-Ga ribbons34, the other appealing aspect in present sample is that, even if an applied magnetic field is up to 30 kOe, the multiple transformations are still persisted, showing a excellently thermodynamic stability (see the inset of Fig. 6). Such an outstanding performance of studied sample is a consequence of the fact that the application of magnetic field tends to stabilize its martensitic phase that possesses a higher magnetization in comparison to its austenitic phase. Since the both transformations are joined together strongly, the magnetic field can not only induce entropy change contributed from MT but also produce an additional part contribution of latent heat involved in the IMT (see Fig. 5). Consequently, the present sample reveals an enhanced MCE associated with the two successive MSTs (see Fig. 6) and appears to be potential candidate for magnetic refrigeration.

In summary, the transformation properties in Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1 Heusler alloy have been studied systematically. Our results sufficiently demonstrated that there are two successive magneto-structural transformations in the sequence of austenite → 7M martensite → L10 martensite in the process of cooling. Accompanied by this exotic property, an enhanced MCE has been obtained around room temperature when the magnetic field changes from 0 to 30 kOe. These experimental findings can also help us to develop more efficiently magnetic refrigerants with such a kind of Heusler alloy system.

Methods

Polycrystalline Ni55.3Mn19.7Ga25 alloy with nominal composition was fabricated from high purity Ni, Mn, Ga elements, by using conventional arc-melting in an argon atmosphere. The weight loss after melting was found to be less than 1%. For homogenization, the obtained ingot was annealed in an evacuated quartz capsule for 72 hours at 1073 K, and slowly cooled to room temperature. Its real composition was determined by energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS, ProX, Phenom) analysis to corresponding to Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1. The crystalline structure at different temperature was identified by x-ray diffraction using Rigaku Ultima-IV x-ray diffractometer. Both of magnetization and specific heat were characterized by physical property measurement system (VersaLab, Quantum Design). Heat flow data were collected by differential scanning calorimeter (DSC, Q2000, TA) on modulated mode with a cooling/heating rate of 3 K/min, and the thermal cycles were also performed by this equipment with a cooling/heating rate of 10 K/min. Examination of thermal strain using a rectangular specimen with a dimension of 2 × 10 × 10 mm3, was acquired in standard strain-gauge technique.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Li, Z. et al. Two successive magneto-structural transformations and their relation to enhanced magnetocaloric effect for Ni55.8Mn18.1Ga26.1 Heusler alloy. Sci. Rep. 5, 15143; doi: 10.1038/srep15143 (2015).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.11364035, 11404186 and 51371111), the Key Basic Research Program of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grant No. 13JC1402400), and Project for Innovative Research Team of Qujing Normal University (Grant No.TD201301), and Project for Applied Basic Research Programs of Yunnan Province (Grant No. 2013FZ110 and 2012FD051).

Footnotes

Author Contributions The idea was proposed by Z.L. and the experiments were carried out by Y.L.Z., C.T. and D.Z. The experimental results were analyzed and interpreted by Z.L., K.X., Y.L.Z. and C.J. The manuscript was written and corrected by Z.L., K.X. and C.J. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

References

  1. Sozinov A., Likhachev A. A., Lanska N. & Ullakko K. Giant magnetic-field-induced strain in NiMnGa seven-layered martensitic phase. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 1746–1748 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  2. Kainuma R. et al. Magnetic-field-induced shape recovery by reverse phase transformation. Nature (London) 439, 957–960 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hu F. X., Shen B. G. & Sun J. R. Magnetic entropy change in Ni51.5Mn22.7Ga25.8 alloy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 3460–3462 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  4. Krenke T. et al. Inverse magnetocaloric effect in ferromagnetic Ni–Mn–Sn alloys Nat. Mater. 4, 450–454 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu J. et al. Giant magnetocaloric effect driven by structural transitions Nat. Mater. 11, 620–626 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barandiarán J. M. et al. Effect of martensitic transformation and magnetic field on transport properties of Ni-Mn-Ga and Ni-Fe-Ga Heusler alloys. Phys. Rev. B 80, 104404 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  7. Koyama K. et al. Observation of large magnetoresistance of magnetic Heusler alloy Ni50Mn36Sn14 in high magnetic fields. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 182510 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  8. Webster P. J., Ziebeck K. R. A., Town S. L. & Peak M. S. Magnetic order and phase transformation in Ni2MnGa. Philos. Mag. B 49, 295–310 (1984). [Google Scholar]
  9. Chernenko V. A. C. et al. Sequence of martensitic transformations in Ni-Mn-Ga alloys. Phys. Rev. B 57, 2659–2662, (1998). [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang W. H. et al. Thermoelastic intermartensitic transformation and its internal stress dependency in Ni52Mn24Ga24 single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 66, 052411 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  11. Kokorin V. V. et al. Intermartensitic phase transitions in Ni–Mn–Ga alloy, magnetic field effect. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 302, 34–39 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  12. Kim J., Inaba F., Fukuda T. & Kakeshita T. Effect of magnetic field on martensitic transformation temperature in Ni–Mn–Ga ferromagnetic shape memory alloys. Act. Mater. 54, 493–499 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  13. Çakir A. et al. Extended investigation of intermartensitic transitions in Ni-Mn-Ga magnetic shape memory alloys: A detailed phase diagram determination. J. Appl. Phys. 114, 183912 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  14. Straka L. et al. Effect of intermartensite transformation on twinning stress in Ni-Mn-Ga 10M martensite. J. Appl. Phys. 114, 063504 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  15. Yu S. Y. et al. Intermartensitic transformation and magnetic field effect in NiMnInSb ferromagnetic shape memory alloys. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 322, 2541–2544 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  16. Ma S. C. et al. Investigation of the intermediate phase and magnetocaloric properties in high-pressure annealing Ni–Mn–Co–Sn alloy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 052506 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  17. Ma S. C. et al. Peculiarity of magnetoresistance in high pressure annealed Ni43Mn41Co5Sn11 alloy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 032407 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  18. Esakki Muthu S. et al. Influence of chemical substitution, magnetic field, and hydrostatic pressure effect on martensitic and intermartensitic transition in bulk Ni49−xCuxMn38Sn13 (0.5 ≤ × ≤ 2) Heusler alloys. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 092404 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  19. Vasil’ev A. N. et al. Structural and magnetic phase transitions in shape-memory alloys Ni2+xMn1−xGa. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1113 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  20. Khovailo V. V. et al. Magnetic properties and magnetostructural phase transitions in Ni2+xMn1−xGa shape memory alloys. Phys. Rev. B 70, 174413 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  21. Cherechukin A. A. et al. Magnetocaloric effect in Ni2+xMn1−xGa Heusler alloys. Phys. Lett. A 326, 146–151 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  22. Pecharsky V. K. & Gschneidner K. A. Jr. Giant Magnetocaloric Effect in Gd5(Si2Ge2). Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4494–4497 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wada H. & Tanabe Y. Giant magnetocaloric effect of MnAs1−xSbx. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 3320 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  24. Tegus O., Bruck E., Buschow K. H. J. & de Boer F. R. Transition-metal-based magnetic refrigerants for room-temperature applications. Nature (London), 415, 150–152 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Trung N. T. et al. From single- to double-first-order magnetic phase transition in magnetocaloric Mn1−xCrxCoGe compounds. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 162507 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu E. K. et al. Stable magnetostructural coupling with tunable magnetoresponsive effects in hexagonal ferromagnets. Nat. Commun. 3, 873 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wei Z. Y. et al. Unprecedentedly Wide Curie-Temperature Windows as Phase-Transition Design Platform for Tunable Magneto-Multifunctional Materials. Adv. Electron. Mater. 1, 1500076 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  28. Pasquale M. et al. Magnetostructural transition and magnetocaloric effect in Ni55Mn20Ga25 single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 72, 094435 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  29. Long Y. et al. Phase transition processes and magnetocaloric effects in the Heusler alloys NiMnGa with concurrence of magnetic and structural phase transition. J. Appl. Phys. 98, 046102 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  30. Stadler S. et al. Magnetocaloric properties of Ni2Mn1−xCuxGa. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 192511 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhou X. Z. et al. Phase transitions and the magnetocaloric effect in Mn rich Ni–Mn–Ga Heusler alloys. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 305, 372–376 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  32. Rama Rao N. V., Gopalana R., Chandrasekarana V. & Sureshb K. G. Microstructure, magnetic properties and magnetocaloric effect in melt-spun Ni–Mn–Ga ribbons. J. Alloys Comp. 478, 59–62 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  33. Li Z. B. et al. Microstructure and magnetocaloric effect of melt-spun Ni52Mn26Ga22 ribbon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 174102 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  34. Li Z. B. et al. Giant magnetocaloric effect in melt-spun Ni-Mn-Ga ribbons with magnetomultistructural transformation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 044101 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  35. Khovailo V. V. et al. Magnetic properties of Ni2.18Mn0.82Ga Heusler alloys with a coupled magnetostructural transition. Phys. Rev. B 65, 092410 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang W. H. et al. Thermal hysteresis and friction of phase boundary motion in ferromagnetic Ni52Mn23Ga25 single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 65, 012416 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang C. L. et al. Magnetostructural phase transition and magnetocaloric effect in off-stoichiometric Mn1.9−xNixGe alloys. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 122505 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu E. K. et al. Giant magnetocaloric effect in isostructural MnNiGe-CoNiGe system by establishing a Curie-temperature window. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 122405 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu E. K. et al. A coupling of martensitic and metamagnetic transitions with collective magnetovolume and table-like magnetocaloric effects. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 062401 (2014). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES