Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 Oct 8;3(5):e00600-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00600-15

Complete Genome Sequence of Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Bacteriophage f18SE, Isolated in Chile

Cristopher Segovia a,b, Ignacio Vasquez a,c, Vinicius Maracaja-Coutinho d,e, James Robeson f, Javier Santander a,g,
PMCID: PMC4599075  PMID: 26450716

Abstract

Bacteriophage f18SE was isolated from poultry sewage in Olmue, Chile, and lytic activity was demonstrated against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and serovar Pullorum strains. This bacteriophage has a 41,868-bp double-stranded DNA (ds-DNA) genome encoding 53 coding sequences (CDSs) and belongs to the family Siphoviridae, subfamily Jerseyvirinae.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis is one of the most common causes of salmonellosis worldwide. S. Enteritidis is typically transmitted by food-products derivate from the poultry industry. Since phage prophylaxis can reduce the use of antibiotics, we isolated the bacteriophage f18SE from poultry sewage (1). This phage has a broad host range infecting S. Enteritidis PTs, Salmonella Pullorum, and Salmonella Typhimurium serovars (1). The morphology of the viral particles is similar to that of phage λ. It has an icosahedral head of 30 × 24 nm, a tail of 95 × 5 nm, and basal spikes. Although, the genome annotation included fibers, they could not be visualized by transmission electron microscopy. f18SE consists of double stranded DNA with a characteristic EcoRI digestion profile (1). According to its characteristics, the phage f18SE belongs to the family Siphoviridae, subfamily Jerseyvirinae (2). f18SE has been successfully evaluated as prophylactic agent in Caenorhabditis elegans (3) and chicks (4). Its stability under harsh conditions (pH and T) and on inoculated eggs is significantly high (5). Also, its membrane attachment molecule is the oligo-polysaccharide of the lipopolysaccharide (6). The potential use of phage f18SE in typification, vector development, and biocontrol strategies can be anticipated, and thus the sequence of this phage can contribute to its potential use and to Salmonella phage biology.

f18SE DNA was purified according to reference (7). DNA sequencing was performed using the next generation sequencer (NGS) Illumina MiSeq (8× coverage) at Universidad Mayor, Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics (Huechuraba, Chile). The sequences were assembled using CLC Genomics Workbench 8.0.1, resulting in a unique contig. f18SE contains 41,868 bp and has a G+C content of 49.8%. The potential coding sequences (CDSs) were initially annotated using BLASTn. The predicted proteins were analyzed using BLASTp. The genome contains 53 predicted genes, with an average gene length of about 875 bp. Seventeen of the genes are rightward oriented, while thirty-six are leftward oriented. Forty-three coding sequences begin with the start codon AUG, while ten begin with the start codon AUU. Based on the predictions, this phage genome contains genes for phage replication, structure, and lysis. Open reading frames (ORFs) were found for putative homing endonuclease, helicase, and DNA polymerase. The ORFs for terminase, head morphogenesis protein, putative tail protein, and tail fiber protein were found. No lysogenization genes, such as site-specific integrases and repressors, were identified. The ORFs for holin and endolysin were also found. Alignment and molecular phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood method (810) shown that three phages closely related to f18SE are Salmonella phages L13 (GenBank accession no. KC832325), wksI3 (GenBank accession no. JX202565), and SS3e (GenBank accession no. AY730274).

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The complete genome of the Salmonella Enteritidis f18SE has been deposited in GenBank under the accession no. KR270151.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the CONICYT/FONDECY Regular competition 1140330, FIC-BIP 30170275-0, and COPEC-UC 2014.J0.71.

We thank Carolina Sanchez (Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Universidad Mayor) and Mario Moreno (Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Universidad Mayor) for their assistance at the sequencing facility, and to Maria Ignacia Diaz for logistic support.

Footnotes

Citation Segovia C, Vasquez I, Maracaja-Coutinho V, Robeson J, Santander J. 2015. Complete genome sequence of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis bacteriophage f18SE, isolated in Chile. Genome Announc 3(5):e00600-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00600-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Santander J, Robeson J. 2002. Isolation and characterization of bacteriophages active against Salmonella enteritidis and their assay on Salmonella pullorum. Acta Microbiol 8:17–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anany H, Switt AI, De Lappe N, Ackermann HW, Reynolds DM, Kropinski AM, Wiedmann M, Griffiths MW, Tremblay D, Moineau S, Nash JH, Turner D. 2015. A proposed new bacteriophage subfamily: “Jerseyvirinae.” Arch Virol 160:1021–1033. doi: 10.1007/s00705-015-2344-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Santander J, Robeson J. 2004. Phage prophylaxis against Salmonella enteritidis using Caenorhabditis elegans as an assay system. Electron J Biotechnol 7:11–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Borie C, Albala I, Sánchez P, Sánchez ML, Ramírez S, Navarro C, Morales MA, Retamales AJ, Robeson J. 2008. Bacteriophage treatment reduces Salmonella colonization of infected chickens. Avian Dis 52:64–67. doi: 10.1637/8091-082007-Reg. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Robeson J, Valencia M, Retamales J, Borie C. 2011. Stability inside hen eggs of a Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis bacteriophage. Electron J Biotechnol 14:11. doi: 10.2225/vol14-issue4-fulltext-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Santander J, Robeson J. 2007. Phage-resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and pathogenicity in Caenorhabditis elegans is mediated by the lipopolysaccharide. Electron J Biotechnol 10:627–632. doi: 10.2225/vol10-issue4-fulltext-14. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kaiser K, Murray N, Whittaker P. 1995. Construction of representative genomic DNA libraries using phages lambda replacement vectors, p 37–83. In Glover D, Hames B (ed), DNA cloning, vol 1: A practical approach. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zuckerkandl E. 1965. [Remarks on the evolution of polynucleotides compared to that of polypeptides]. Bull Soc Chim Biol (Paris) 47:1729–1730. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES