Abstract
Here, we report the genome sequence of Lactobacillus johnsonii, a member of the gut lactobacilli. This draft genome of L. johnsonii strain 16 isolated from C57BL/6J mice enables the identification of bacterial genes responsible for host-specific gut persistence.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Lactobacillus johnsonii belongs to the lactic acid bacteria. It inhabits the gut of several hosts (1–6) and includes strains with probiotic activity (7–11). L. johnsonii levels were shown to be significantly higher in fecal samples of C57BL/6J mice than those of BALB/c. It was further suggested that the host genetics has a major effect on the persistence of L. johnsonii strain 16 in the gut of C57BL/6J mice (12). Here, we describe the draft genome sequence of L. johnsonii strain 16 isolated from a fecal sample of C57BL/6J mice in 2007, grown at Technion, Israel, and subjected to whole-genome shotgun sequencing.
Two different libraries, with average insert sizes of 330 bp and 3,700 bp, were prepared and sequenced using Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx, generating 5,908,676 31-bp paired-end reads and 4,615,910 31-bp mate-pair past-filtered reads, with a coverage of 183×. The reads of the two libraries were de novo assembled simultaneously with different insert lengths with Velvet 0.7.54 (13), generating 210 contigs of >100 bp using reads with a minimum quality of 30 for each base. The assembly covers 1,794,984 bp, with an N50 of 34,798 bp and a longest segment of 118,507 bp. Mapping was done to validate the de novo assembly using MAQ 0.7.1 and BWA 0.5.8c (14), with a maximum of two differences from the reference sequence per read. Of the single reads, 95.6% were mapped to the assembly, and 80% of the single reads were mapped to the L. johnsonii NCC533 genome (15), covering 84.8% of the genome. In parallel, the 210 contigs were contiguated (aligned, ordered, and oriented), using ABACAS (16), to the L. johnsonii NCC 533 chromosome (15), which served as a reference genome. One scaffold that splits into 133 contigs was produced, with a total length of 1,491,125 bp, compared to 1,992,676 bp of the L. johnsonii NCC 533 genome. Seventy-seven contigs of the original 210 contigs could not be aligned to that reference genome. This implies that the human isolate L. johnsonii NCC 533 may not be a proper reference genome for the assembly of the mouse isolate L. johnsonii strain 16. Therefore, we relied on the de novo assembly, in which contigs <200 bp were removed.
The draft genome of L. johnsonii strain 16 consists of 156 segments covering 1.78 Mbp (34.6% G+C content). A total of 1,703 coding sequences (CDSs), 49 pseudogenes, 4 rRNAs, 42 tRNAs, and 1 noncoding RNA (ncRNA) were predicted and annotated by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (17).
The whole-genome sequence of L. johnsonii strain 16 might lead to the discovery of bacterial genes that may be involved in bacterial persistence in the gut. In a previous study, we showed a phylogenetic separation among L. johnsonii isolates associated with the taxonomic classification of their hosts, indicating coevolution of the host and its gut bacteria (18). Thus, the gathered information on both host and bacterial genes involved in bacterial gut persistence call for the development of probiotic products specifically oriented to the consumer’s genetics as part of a personalized medicine approach.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession no. LIGY00000000. The version described in this paper is version LIGY00000000.1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Fasteris SA, Switzerland, for performing the genomic sequencing using the Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx and for bioinformatics analysis.
We state that internal laboratory funds were used for the study.
Footnotes
Citation Buhnik-Rosenblau K, Danin-Poleg Y, Elgavish S, Kashi Y. 2015. Draft genome sequence of Lactobacillus johnsonii strain 16, isolated from mice. Genome Announc 3(5):e01141-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01141-15.
REFERENCES
- 1.Kim SY, Adachi Y. 2007. Biological and genetic classification of canine intestinal lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria. Microbiol Immunol 51:919–928. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2007.tb03983.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Peña JA, Li SY, Wilson PH, Thibodeau SA, Szary AJ, Versalovic J. 2004. Genotypic and phenotypic studies of murine intestinal lactobacilli: species differences in mice with and without colitis. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:558–568. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.1.558-568.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stephenson DP, Moore RJ, Allison GE. 2009. Comparison and utilization of repetitive-element PCR techniques for typing Lactobacillus isolates from the chicken gastrointestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:6764–6776. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01150-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Carina Audisio M, Torres MJ, Sabaté DC, Ibarguren C, Apella MC. 2011. Properties of different lactic acid bacteria isolated from Apis mellifera L. bee-gut. Microbiol Res 166:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2010.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Korhonen JM, Sclivagnotis Y, von Wright A. 2007. Characterization of dominant cultivable lactobacilli and their antibiotic resistance profiles from faecal samples of weaning piglets. J Appl Microbiol 103:2496–2503. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03483.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dec M, Puchalski A, Urban-Chmiel R, Wernicki A. 2014. Screening of Lactobacillus strains of domestic goose origin against bacterial poultry pathogens for use as probiotics. Poult Sci 93:2464–2472. doi: 10.3382/ps.2014-04025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.du Toit M, Franz CM, Schillinger U, Haberer P, Warlies B, Ahrens F, Holzapfel WH. 1998. Characterisation and selection of probiotic lactobacilli for a preliminary minipig feeding trial and their effect on serum cholesterol levels, faeces pH and faeces moisture content. Int J Food Microbiol 40:93–104. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00024-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.La Ragione RM, Narbad A, Gasson MJ, Woodward MJ. 2004. In vivo characterization of Lactobacillus johnsonii FI9785 for use as a defined competitive exclusion agent against bacterial pathogens in poultry. Lett Appl Microbiol 38:197–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01474.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lai KK, Lorca GL, Gonzalez CF. 2009. Biochemical properties of two cinnamoyl esterases purified from a Lactobacillus johnsonii strain isolated from stool samples of diabetes-resistant rats. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:5018–5024. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02837-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vizoso Pinto MG, Schuster T, Briviba K, Watzl B, Holzapfel WH, Franz CM. 2007. Adhesive and chemokine stimulatory properties of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus strains. J Food Prot 70:125–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Van Coillie E, Goris J, Cleenwerck I, Grijspeerdt K, Botteldoorn N, Van Immerseel F, De Buck J, Vancanneyt M, Swings J, Herman L, Heyndrickx M. 2007. Identification of lactobacilli isolated from the cloaca and vagina of laying hens and characterization for potential use as probiotics to control Salmonella Enteritidis. J Appl Microbiol 102:1095–1106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03164.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Buhnik-Rosenblau K, Danin-Poleg Y, Kashi Y. 2011. Predominant effect of host genetics on levels of Lactobacillus johnsonii bacteria in the mouse gut. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:6531–6538. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00324-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li H, Durbin R. 2010. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26:589–595. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pridmore RD, Berger B, Desiere F, Vilanova D, Barretto C, Pittet AC, Zwahlen MC, Rouvet M, Altermann E, Barrangou R, Mollet B, Mercenier A, Klaenhammer T, Arigoni F, Schell MA. 2004. The genome sequence of the probiotic intestinal bacterium Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC 533. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:2512–2517. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307327101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Assefa S, Keane TM, Otto TD, Newbold C, Berriman M. 2009. ABACAS: algorithm-based automatic contiguation of assembled sequences. Bioinformatics 25:1968–1969. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tatusova TD, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Ciufo S, Li W. 2013. Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. The NCBI handbook, 2nd ed. National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK174280/. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Buhnik-Rosenblau K, Matsko-Efimov V, Jung M, Shin H, Danin-Poleg Y, Kashi Y. 2012. Indication for co-evolution of Lactobacillus johnsonii with its hosts. BMC Microbiol 12:149. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
