Abstract
Bacillus methylotrophicus is implicated in phytostimulation and disease suppression of agricultural and bioenergy crops. Here, we present the genome sequences of B. methylotrophicus strains B26 and OB9. Their assembly resulted in 26 and 24 contigs, respectively. These strains are well suited for comparative genomics studies and the evaluation of commercially valuable biomolecular compounds.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Bacillus methylotrophicus is a recently described Gram-positive bacterium (1), which, like other species of the genus, is associated with plant roots and exerts beneficial effects on plant development (2–5). It competitively colonizes plant roots, may internalize plant tissues, and can simultaneously act as biofertilizer and antagonist (biopesticide) of recognized root pathogens, including Gram-negative bacteria and fungi (4, 6). Phytostimulation and disease suppression are partly linked to the production of secondary metabolites and antibiotics (5). This species is similar to Bacillus subtilis and is considered a successful biological control agent due to an endospore-forming lifestyle that facilitates the development of commercial products with long-term viability (7). Strain B26, previously described as B. subtilis B26 and isolated from the bioenergy crop switchgrass (4), and strain OB9, from crude oil, both produce lipopeptides, such as surfactins. These biomolecules, in addition to their antimicrobial activity (8), act as immunostimulators of the host plant (5) and have gained importance in the fields of environmental bioremediation, food processing, and pharmaceuticals (9).
Genomic DNA was isolated from overnight cultures using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and according to manufacturer's instructions for Gram-positive bacteria. Genomic DNA (500 ng) was mechanically fragmented for 40 s using a Covaris M220 (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA) with the default settings. Fragmented DNA was transferred to PCR tubes, and library synthesis was performed with the Kapa Hyper Prep kit (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. TruSeq HT adapters (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) were used to bar code the libraries, which were each sequenced in 1/48 of an Illumina MiSeq 300-bp paired-end run at the Plateforme d’ Analyses Génomiques of the Institut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (Laval University, Quebec, Canada). Sequencing datasets were assembled de novo with the A5 pipeline (10).
The B26 genome assembly consists of 26 contigs (median coverage, 85×), for an estimated total size of 3,868,758 bp, while the OB9 genome assembly consists of 24 contigs (median coverage, 54×), for an estimated total size of 3,861,454 bp. Core genome phylogeny with the Harvest suite (11) and whole-genome BLASTn searches (12) revealed that the genomes of strains B26 and OB9 are closely related to one another and are part of the same clade as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subs. plantarum isolate UCMB5113 (13). However, it was recently demonstrated that this taxon is paraphyletic and should be included in B. methylotrophicus (14).
These strains are well suited for comparative genomics with other Bacillus strains and the evaluation of new biomolecular compounds that are valuable for commercial production.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession numbers LGAT00000000 (B26) and LGAU00000000 (OB9).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery grant to S. Jabaji.
We thank Mamta Rani for technical assistance and isolation of strain OB9.
Footnotes
Citation Jeukens J, Kukavica-Ibrulj I, Freschi L, Jabaji S, Levesque RC. 2015. Draft genome sequences of two lipopeptide-producing strains of Bacillus methylotrophicus. Genome Announc 3(5):e01176-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01176-15.
REFERENCES
- 1.Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Kwon SW, Sa TM. 2010. Bacillus methylotrophicus sp. nov., a methanol-utilizing, plant-growth-promoting bacterium isolated from rice rhizosphere soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:2490–2495. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.015487-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Borriss R, Chen XH, Rueckert C, Blom J, Becker A, Baumgarth B, Fan B, Pukall R, Schumann P, Spröer C, Junge H, Vater J, Pühler A, Klenk HP. 2011. Relationship of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens clades associated with strains DSM 7T and FZB42T: a proposal for Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. amyloliquefaciens subsp. nov. and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum subsp. nov. based on complete genome sequence comparisons. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:1786–1801. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.023267-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chen XH, Koumoutsi A, Scholz R, Eisenreich A, Schneider K, Heinemeyer I, Morgenstern B, Voss B, Hess WR, Reva O, Junge H, Voigt B, Jungblut PR, Vater J, Süssmuth R, Liesegang H, Strittmatter A, Gottschalk G, Borriss R. 2007. Comparative analysis of the complete genome sequence of the plant growth-promoting bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Nat Biotechnol 25:1007–1014. doi: 10.1038/nbt1325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gagne-Bourgue F, Aliferis KA, Seguin P, Rani M, Samson R, Jabaji S. 2013. Isolation and characterization of indigenous endophytic bacteria associated with leaves of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) cultivars. J Appl Microbiol 114:836–853. doi: 10.1111/jam.12088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gagné-Bourque F, Mayer BF, Charron JB, Vali H, Bertrand A, Jabaji S. 2015. Accelerated growth rate and increased drought stress resilience of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon colonized by Bacillus subtilis B26. PLoS One 10:e0130456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bacon CW, Palencia ER, Hinton DM. 2015. Abiotic and biotic plant stress-tolerant and beneficial secondary metabolites produced by endophytic Bacillus species, p 163–177. In Arora NK. (ed), Plant microbes symbiosis: applied facets. Springer Verlag, New Delhi, India. [Google Scholar]
- 7.McKenney PT, Driks A, Eichenberger P. 2013. The Bacillus subtilis endospore: assembly and functions of the multilayered coat. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:33–44. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bais HP, Fall R, Vivanco JM. 2004. Biocontrol of Bacillus subtilis against infection of Arabidopsis roots by Pseudomonas syringae is facilitated by biofilm formation and surfactin production. Plant Physiol 134:307–319. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.028712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mukherjee S, Das P, Sen R. 2006. Towards commercial production of microbial surfactants. Trends Biotechnol 24:509–515. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tritt A, Eisen JA, Facciotti MT, Darling AE. 2012. An integrated pipeline for de novo assembly of microbial genomes. PLoS One 7:e42304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Treangen TJ, Ondov BD, Koren S, Phillippy AM. 2014. The Harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol 15:524. doi: 10.1186/PREACCEPT-2573980311437212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W. 2000. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol 7:203–214. doi: 10.1089/10665270050081478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Niazi A, Manzoor S, Asari S, Bejai S, Meijer J, Bongcam-Rudloff E. 2014. Genome analysis of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum UCMB5113: a rhizobacterium that improves plant growth and stress management. PLoS One 9:e104651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dunlap CA, Kim S, Kwon SW, Rooney AP. 2015. Phylogenomic analysis shows that Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum is a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus methylotrophicus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:2104–2109. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.000226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
