Abstract
Elizabethkingia sp. BM10 was isolated from the hindgut of the wood-feeding termite Reticulitermes speratus KMT1. It had cellobiohydrolase and β-glucosidase activities but not endo-β-glucanase activity. The complete sequence of its genome, which has a total size of 4,242,519 bases, is reported here. The genomic analysis identified six β-glucosidase candidate genes and three β-glucanase candidate genes.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Wood-feeding termites are not only pests but are also natural models for efficient biological degradation of woods (1, 2). Their digestive systems have evolved with various symbiotic microbes, such as bacteria and protozoa (3, 4). Therefore, the functional contribution of symbiotic microbes is a critical part of the biological wood degradation in termites.
In a previous study (5), 16 bacterial species were isolated from the wood-feeding termite Reticulitermes speratus KMT1. Their endo-β-glucanase activity was barely detectable but their cellobiohydrolase and β-glucosidase activities were comparable to those of Fomitopsis palustris FFPRI 0507, a wood-decaying fungus (6). The lack of endo-β-glucanase activity may be a result of symbiotic adaptation in the hindgut of termites. Among these 16 species, Elizabethkingia sp. BM10 had strong cellobiohydrolase and β-glucosidase activities.
Here, we report the complete genome of Elizabethkingia sp. BM10, a symbiotic bacterium of the wood-feeding termite R. speratus KMT1. The genomic DNA of Elizabethkingia sp. BM10 was isolated using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method, and the genome was sequenced using a PacBio RS II system (Pacific Biosciences, Menio Park, CA, USA). The individual reads were assembled with the HGAP 2.0 (Pacific Biosciences). Prokka (7) was used to identify and annotate the genes.
The Elizabethkingia sp. BM10 genome was found to be composed of a chromosome that is 4,242,519 bp long and contains 3,893 coding sequences (CDSs), 55 tRNA genes, and 15 rRNA genes, with a GC content of 35.7%. The number of CDSs with a predicted function was 2,556 (65.66% of the total). The function analysis identified three candidate genes for endo-β-glucanase, that is, one gene (VO54_00280) for glycoside hydrolase family 5 and two genes (VO54_00275 and VO54_01019) for glycoside hydrolase family 16. Six candidate genes (VO54_00821, VO54_01398, VO54_03284, VO54_03419, VO54_03735, and VO54_03904) were identified for β-glucosidase. Among them, four genes are also found in the genome sequences of other Elizabethkingia strains, with more than 90% maximum identities. The other two genes, VO54_00821 and VO54_03735, were unique in Elizabethkingia sp. BM10, with maximum identities of 80% and 63%, respectively, in the NCBI database. The genome had two candidate enzyme genes (VO54_03451 and VO54_03884) for xylan degradation. It was found that, for nitrogen metabolism, Elizabethkingia sp. BM10 did not have a nitrogen fixation system but it had glutamine synthetase (VO54_01331) and glutamate synthase (VO54_00126, VO54_00127, and VO54_00236) for ammonia utilization.
Research on the genome of Elizabethkingia sp. BM10 will provide insights into symbiotic adaptation of the bacteria in the cellulose digestion of termites and the possible benefits of natural cellulose degradation.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The complete genome sequence of Elizabethkingia sp. BM10 has been deposited in GenBank under the accession number CP011059.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by a grant (S211315L010120) from Forest Science & Technology Projects, Forest Service, Republic of Korea.
Footnotes
Citation Lee D, Kim Y-K, Kim Y-S, Kim T-J. 2015. Complete genome sequence of Elizabethkingia sp. BM10, a symbiotic bacterium of the wood-feeding termite Reticulitermes speratus KMT1. Genome Announc 3(5):e01181-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01181-15.
REFERENCES
- 1.Xie S, Syrenne R, Sun S, Yuan JS. 2014. Exploration of natural biomass utilization systems (NBUS) for advanced biofuel—from systems biology to synthetic design. Curr Opin Biotechnol 27:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.König H, Li L, Fröhlich J. 2013. The cellulolytic system of the termite gut. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:7943–7962. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5119-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brune A. 2014. Symbiotic digestion of lignocellulose in termite guts. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:168–180. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Scharf ME, Karl ZJ, Sethi A, Boucias DG. 2011. Multiple levels of synergistic collaboration in termite lignocellulose digestion. PLoS One 6:e21709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cho M-J, Kim Y-H, Shin K, Kim Y-K, Kim Y-S, Kim T-J. 2010. Symbiotic adaptation of bacteria in the gut of Reticulitermes speratus: low endo-β-1,4-glucanase activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 395:432–435. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.04.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yoon J-J, Igarashi K, Kajisa T, Samejima M. 2006. Purification, identification and molecular cloning of glycoside hydrolase family 15 glucoamylase from the brown-rot basidiomycete Fomitopsis palustris. FEMS Microbiol Lett 259:288–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00279.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. BioInformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]