Skip to main content
OncoTargets and Therapy logoLink to OncoTargets and Therapy
. 2015 Oct 5;8:2805–2815. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S86515

Molecular diagnostics of a single drug-resistant multiple myeloma case using targeted next-generation sequencing

Hiroshi Ikeda 1,, Kazuya Ishiguro 1, Tetsuyuki Igarashi 1, Yuka Aoki 1, Toshiaki Hayashi 1, Tadao Ishida 1, Yasushi Sasaki 1,2,, Takashi Tokino 2, Yasuhisa Shinomura 1
PMCID: PMC4599646  PMID: 26491355

Abstract

A 69-year-old man was diagnosed with IgG λ-type multiple myeloma (MM), Stage II in October 2010. He was treated with one cycle of high-dose dexamethasone. After three cycles of bortezomib, the patient exhibited slow elevations in the free light-chain levels and developed a significant new increase of serum M protein. Bone marrow cytogenetic analysis revealed a complex karyotype characteristic of malignant plasma cells. To better understand the molecular pathogenesis of this patient, we sequenced for mutations in the entire coding regions of 409 cancer-related genes using a semiconductor-based sequencing platform. Sequencing analysis revealed eight nonsynonymous somatic mutations in addition to several copy number variants, including CCND1 and RB1. These alterations may play roles in the pathobiology of this disease. This targeted next-generation sequencing can allow for the prediction of drug resistance and facilitate improvements in the treatment of MM patients.

Keywords: multiple myeloma, drug resistance, genome-wide sequencing, semiconductor sequencer, target therapy

Introduction

Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by malignant plasma cell proliferation in the bone marrow (BM) associated with monoclonal protein in the serum and/or urine.1,2 Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and novel agents such as bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide have improved the survival of MM patients.3,4 However, most patients eventually relapse even after the achievement of a complete therapeutic response. Improvements in molecular profiling technologies have provided new insight into the basic molecular events underlying the development of MM as well as the mechanisms of anticancer drug resistance. The transition from the long-established one-size-fits-all approach to new strategies based on individual genetic profiles provides an opportunity to transform current diagnostics into individual prognostic and even predictive classifications.

In MM, there are two distinct genetic subtypes based on copy number alterations and translocations. Approximately half of all MM cases are hyperdiploid, which is characterized by multiple trisomies of chromosomes 3, 5, 7, 9 11, 15, 19, and 21 and a lower prevalence of primary translocations involving the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) locus at 14q32.5,6 The remaining cases form the nonhyperdiploid group, and chromosomes 8, 13, 14, and 16 are frequently lost. Nonhyperdiploid myeloma is strongly associated with translocations of IgH alleles with various partner chromosomes. Copy number alterations in chromosomal regions, such as 1q, 6q, 8p, and 16q, occur in both subtypes. Overall, nonhyperdiploid MM is associated with worse survival compared with hyperdiploid MM.

Methods for determining DNA content and, ultimately, ploidy in MM include conventional cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), comparative genomic hybridization, and, recently, massively parallel whole genome sequencing. Because unique mutations have been observed in individual human cancer samples, the identification and characterization of the molecular alterations of individual cancer patients is a critical step toward the development of more effective personalized therapies. For example, next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have revolutionized cancer genomics research by providing a comprehensive method of detecting genomic alterations associated with somatic cancer.79 In this study, we sequenced all exons of 409 cancer-related genes in matched tumor and normal DNA samples from a multidrug-resistant myeloma patient using a next-generation semiconductor sequencing protocol.

Case report

A 69-year-old male presented in October 2010 with back pain. Physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging revealed large focal lesions in the fourth thoracic vertebra (Figure 1A) and first lumbar vertebra (Figure 1B). Laboratory evaluation revealed a white blood cell count of 2.5×103/μL with no atypical cells, a red blood cell count of 3.67×106/μL, a hemoglobin level of 11.6 g/dL, and a platelet count of 122×106/μL. The serum total protein level was 10.7 g/dL, the albumin level was 3.4 g/dL, the serum β2 microglobulin level was 4.2 mg/dL, and the serum calcium level was 8.9 mg/dL. The concentrations of IgG, IgA, and IgM were 6,284, 34, and 25 mg/dL, respectively. The monoclonal protein IgG was increased, and serum immunofixation revealed the production of IgG with λ light-chain restriction (data not shown). The proliferation of plasma cells (more than 10% among all nucleated cells) was also detected in BM aspirates. When BM biopsy was performed, the infiltration of plasma cells expressing IgG λ monoclonal protein was identified by pathological investigation, and the patient was diagnosed with MM (Stage II according to the International Staging System). Chromosome analysis at this time using conventional Giemsa banding of BM-derived metaphase spreads revealed a normal karyotype (46, XX) in all analyzed cells. The patient was then treated with one cycle of high-dose dexamethasone, followed by three cycles of bortezomib plus dexamethasone. He achieved complete response according to the International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria. His symptoms were also significantly improved.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Sagittal T1-weighted magnetic resonance images depict focuses of plasma cell infiltration and pathologic fractures in the T4 (A) and L1 (B) vertebrae.

Note: Red arrows indicate large focal lesions in the vertebrae.

In August 2012, the serum concentrations of IgG and free light chain (FLC) gradually increased, suggesting the worsening of his MM. His complete blood count was as follows: 1.8×103/μL white blood cells, 3.61×106/μL red blood cells, 11.6 g/dL hemoglobin, and 55×106/μL platelets. BM analysis showed complex aberrations often observed in this patient (Figures 2A and 2B) and an elevated plasma cell percentage (59.8%). His karyotype was 39, XY, del(1)(p22p36), −3, −6, der(8)t(6:8)(p11.1:p23), −10, t(11:14)(q13:q32), −12, add(13) (q22), add(16)(q22), −17, add(18)(p11), −19, −20, +mar [4]/46, XY [20]. The chromosomal translocation t(11:14) (q13:q32), which generates the IgH/CCND1 fusion gene, was also identified in our case by FISH (Figure 2C).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Evaluation of a bone marrow aspirate.

Notes: (A) Conventional karyotyping of metaphase cells from BM aspirate was performed using the G-banding technique. Complex cytogenetic aberrancies including loss of chromosomes, and additional uncharacterized materials at chromosome 8 (1) and 13 (2) are shown here. In addition, a dicentric translocation involving chromosome 11 and 14 (3) were also observed. (B) Visualization of CNVs over the entire genome in the karyotype view. The decreased copy number is indicated in red with increased copy number indicated in blue. (C) Interphase FISH studies were performed on BM aspirates using IgH/CCND1 dual color dual fusion probe (Vysis Inc., Des Plaines, IL, USA). The cell showed one orange (normal CCND1), one green (normal IgH), and two yellow signals (arrows), indicating typical t(11;14) rearrangement.

Abbreviations: CNV, copy number variant; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; BM, bone marrow.

The patient was started on a bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone regimen. No serious complications occurred during the course of the treatment, and a partial response was observed with a decrease in the serum FLC value. After seven cycles of this regimen, however, his condition progressively deteriorated, with increases in serum lambda immunoglobulin light chain and LDH, a deterioration of renal function, and the appearance of circulating plasma cells in the peripheral blood (up to 5% of the total peripheral leukocyte population). He was admitted for combination chemotherapy with combination chemotherapy with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, but his response was poor (Figure 3), and an increase in myeloma cells was detected by BM biopsy. Unfortunately, the patient has since passed away, and his family did not choose to perform postmortem examination.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Clinical course of the patient.

Abbreviations: HD, high dose; DEX, dexamethsone; Cy, cyclophosphamide; FLC, free light chain; IgG, Immunoglobulin G.

The patient provided consent for use of his medical record and samples for clinical and research purposes, and the examination was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The sequence study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Sapporo Medical University. Retrospectively, to better understand the molecular pathogenesis in this patient, we sequenced 409 cancer-related genes in matched tumor and nontumor DNA samples at relapse in August 2012 using an Ion Torrent PGM (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). DNA was extracted from magnetic bead–enriched BM CD138 positive tumor cells from the patient, and CD138 negative cells were used as matched nontumor cells. DNA (40 ng) was used for multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification with an Ion Ampliseq Comprehensive Cancer Panel (Life Technologies), enabling the targeted coverage of all exons of 409 cancer-related genes frequently cited and mutated (covered regions =95.4% of total). The 15,992 amplicons obtained represented more than 1.2 Mb of target sequence. Library preparation and sequencing with an Ion Torrent PGM was performed as previously described.9 The mean read depths were 125× (tumor) and 152× (normal). Alignment to the human genome build 19 and variant calling were performed by Ion Reporter Software 4.0. Mutations were also validated by conventional Sanger sequencing. We identified eight nonsynonymous somatic mutations (6.49 mutations/Mb; Table 1). We included missense mutations in seven genes (SYNE1, IKBKB, ERBB3, MYH11, CYLD, TP53, and CDH2) and a frameshift mutation in EGFR. Changes in relative copy number were also assessed from the sequencing data, and we identified 133 copy number variant (CNV) regions, including 87 gain and 46 loss regions (Figure 2B and Table S1). Importantly, we found a gain in the copy number of CCND1, a gene encoding cyclin D1. To check the contamination of tumor cells in the CD138 negative subset, we compared CD138 negative DNA of this patient and peripheral blood DNA from two healthy donors. We found single nucleotide variants in the CD138 negative DNA of this patient; however, all variants had previously been reported in the NCBI dbSNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/) (Tables 2 and 3). Therefore, we can rule out tumor cell contamination in the CD138 negative subset.

Table 1.

Somatic mutations identified in our case

Gene Function Exon Protein Coding Total coverage Variant coverage Variant frequency (%)
SYNE1 Missense 60 p.Val3187Gly c.9560T>G 68 11 16.2
EGFR Frameshift deletion 13 p.Glu513Gly c.1538_1539delG 235 218 92.8
IKBKB Missense 9 p.Val241Glu c.722T>A 125 20 16.0
ERBB3 Missense 25 p.Thr1024Asn c.3071C>A 158 47 29.7
MYH11 Missense 8 p.Ala275Gly c.824C>G 70 15 21.4
CYLD Missense 18 p.Cys791Arg c.2371T>C 25 15 60.0
TP53 Missense 5 p.Arg158Gly c.472C>G 79 71 89.9
CDH2 Missense 16 p.Asp906Glu c.2718C>G 86 16 18.6

Notes: List of total coverage, variant read coverage, and variant frequencies of somatic mutations identified in DNA isolated from BM aspirates of this case. BM mononuclear cells were separated using Ficoll–Paque density sedimentation, and plasma cells were purified by positive selection with anti-CD138 magnetic-activated cell separation microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Somatic mutations were detected using statistical approaches in tumor (CD138 positive) and normal (CD138 negative) samples from the Ion Reporter software 4.0 tumor-normal workflow. A sequencing coverage of 25× and a minimum variant frequency of 15% of the total number of distinct tags were used as cutoffs. Mutations were called if they occurred in <1% of reads in the normal control, and were absent from dbSNP and the 1,000 Genomes Project database.

Abbreviation: BM, bone marrow.

Table 2.

Nucleotide variants identified in CD138-negative bone marrow aspirates from our case-1

Locus number Coverage Variant coverage Frequency (%) Gene Function Exon Protein Coding dbsnpa
chr2:219543924 155 67 43.2 STK36 Missense 7 p.Arg240Trp c.718C>T rs35038757
chr3:14199887 189 101 53.4 XPC Missense 9 p.Ala499Val c.1496C>T rs2228000
chr4:106155185 127 127 100.0 TET2 Missense 3 p.Pro29Arg c.86C>G rs12498609
chr4:1801064 158 60 38.0 FGFR3 Missense 3 p.Gly65Arg c.193G>A rs2305178
chr4:1807488 100 48 48.0 FGFR3 Missense 13 p.Val555Leu c.1663G>T rs199544087
chr4:55139771 328 155 47.3 PDGFRA Missense 10 p.Ser478Pro c.1432T>C rs35597368
chr4:55981531 153 59 38.6 KDR Missense 4 p.Val136Met c.406G>A rs35636987
chr5:176637576 102 102 100.0 NSD1 Missense 5 p.Ser726Pro c.2176T>C rs28932178
chr5:256509 134 61 45.5 SDHA Missense 15 p.Val657Ile c.1969G>A rs6962
chr5:7878179 139 79 56.8 MTRR Missense 5 p.Ser202Leu c.605C>T rs1532268
chr6:152443756 115 60 52.2 SYNE1 Missense 146 p.Gly8737Ser c.26209G>A rs2295191
chr6:32190390 150 148 98.7 NOTCH4 Missense 3 p.Lys117Gln c.349A>C rs915894
chr6:56351972 143 74 51.7 DST Missense 81 p.Leu4874Val c.14620C>G rs80260070
chr6:56417545 104 103 99.0 DST Missense 55 p.Thr3230Ala c.9688A>G rs4715631
chr6:56463410 144 72 50.0 DST Missense 40 p.Gln1812Arg c.5435A>G rs4712138
chr7:6026988 140 67 47.9 PMS2 Missense 11 p.Pro470Ser c.1408C>T rs1805321
chr7:91712698 220 101 45.9 AKAP9 Missense 33 p.Asn2792Ser c.8375A>G rs6960867
chr8:145741439 180 105 58.3 RECQL4 Missense 5 p.Arg355Gln c.1064G>A rs374743591
chr10:43610119 230 111 48.3 RET Missense 11 p.Gly691Ser c.2071G>A rs1799939
chr10:70332672 226 117 51.8 TET1 Missense 2 p.Ser193Thr c.577T>A rs12773594
chr12:49431094 189 94 49.7 KMT2D Missense 34 p.Met3349Val c.10045A>G rs80149580
chr14:51224417 141 74 52.5 NIN Missense 18 p.Pro1111Ala c.3331C>G rs2236316
chr14:92460227 200 98 49.0 TRIP11 Missense 15 p.Glu1696Lys c.5086G>A rs80200454
chr14:92472416 87 48 55.2 TRIP11 Missense 11 p.Ser635Cys c.1904C>G rs59635749
chr15:40898643 173 77 44.5 CASC5 Missense 4 p.Arg43Thr c.128G>C rs7177192
chr15:40913840 208 92 44.2 CASC5 Missense 10 p.Ala460Ser c.1378G>T rs2412541
chr15:40914177 114 54 47.4 CASC5 Missense 10 p.Met572Thr c.1715T>C rs11858113
chr15:40915190 148 78 52.7 CASC5 Missense 10 p.Arg910Gly c.2728A>G rs8040502
chr15:40916632 173 78 45.1 CASC5 Missense 10 p.Asp1390Glu c.4170T>A rs141726041
chr15:41805237 149 72 48.3 LTK Missense 2 p.Arg42Gln c.125G>A rs2305030
chr17:5462805 136 67 49.3 NLRP1 Missense 4 p.Arg404Gln c.1211G>A rs3744718
chr18:47800179 147 61 41.5 MBD1 Missense 12 p.Pro401Ala c.1201C>G rs125555
chr18:50832072 125 73 58.4 DCC Missense 13 p.Leu679Arg c.2036T>G rs2271042
chr19:18876309 106 52 49.1 CRTC1 Missense 10 p.Thr344Ala c.1030A>G rs3746266

Notes: DNA was extracted from CD138-negative BM aspirates of this case and peripheral blood of healthy donor-1 (TT) using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) following manufacturer’s instructions. DNA (40 ng) was used for multiplex PCR amplification with an Ion Ampliseq Comprehensive Cancer Panel (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA,USA), enabling the targeted coverage of all exons of 409 cancer-related genes in a 4-tube reaction (covered regions =95.4% of total). Nucleotide variants on the CD138-negative BM aspirates of this case were detected using the peripheral blood of healthy donor-1 as a normal control. A sequencing coverage of 25× and a minimum variant frequency of 15% of the total number of distinct tags were used as cutoffs.

a

dbSNP ID number.

Abbreviations: BM, bone marrow; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

Table 3.

Nucleotide variants identified in CD138 negative bone marrow aspirates from our case-2

Locus number Coverage Variant coverage Frequency (%) Gene Codon Exon Protein Coding dbsnpa
chr1:114948281 64 63 98.4 TRIM33 Missense 15 p.Ile840Thr c.2519T>C rs6537825
chr1:144879485 120 28 23.3 PDE4DIP Missense 27 p.Thr1322Arg c.3965C>G rs113467089
chr1:206665052 136 68 50.0 IKBKE Missense 18 p.Ala602Val c.1805C>T rs12059562
chr1:226555302 223 119 53.4 PARP1 Missense 17 p.Val762Ala c.2285T>C rs1136410
chr2:219543924 155 67 43.2 STK36 Missense 7 p.Arg240Trp c.718C>T rs35038757
chr4:1801064 158 60 38.0 FGFR3 Missense 3 p.Gly65Arg c.193G>A rs2305178
chr4:1807488 100 48 48.0 FGFR3 Missense 13 p.Val555Leu c.1663G>T rs199544087
chr4:55139771 328 155 47.3 PDGFRA Missense 10 p.Ser478Pro c.1432T>C rs35597368
chr4:55981531 153 59 38.6 KDR Missense 4 p.Val136Met c.406G>A rs35636987
chr5:256509 134 61 45.5 SDHA Missense 15 p.Val657Ile c.1969G>A rs6962
chr5:38496637 214 94 43.9 LIFR Missense 13 p.Asp578Asn c.1732G>A rs3729740
chr5:7878179 139 79 56.8 MTRR Missense 5 p.Ser202Leu c.605C>T rs1532268
chr6:152443756 115 60 52.2 SYNE1 Missense 146 p.Gly8737Ser c.26209G>A rs2295191
chr6:51890823 157 87 55.4 PKHD1 Missense 32 p.Ala1262Val c.3785C>T rs9296669
chr6:51914956 104 52 50.0 PKHD1 Missense 22 p.Arg760Cys c.2278C>T rs9370096
chr6:56351972 143 74 51.7 DST Missense 81 p.Leu4874Val c.14620C>G rs80260070
chr6:56417282 157 157 100.0 DST Missense 55 p.Met3317Ile c.9951G>A rs4715630
chr6:56417545 104 103 99.0 DST Missense 55 p.Thr3230Ala c.9688A>G rs4715631
chr7:106509331 138 63 45.7 PIK3CG Missense 2 p.Ser442Tyr c.1325C>A rs17847825
chr8:145741439 180 105 58.3 RECQL4 Missense 5 p.Arg355Gln c.1064G>A rs374743591
chr9:8518052 124 67 54.0 PTPRD Missense 21 p.Gln447Glu c.1339C>G rs10977171
chr10:43610119 230 111 48.3 RET Missense 11 p.Gly691Ser c.2071G>A rs1799939
chr12:49431094 189 94 49.7 KMT2D Missense 34 p.Met3349Val c.10045A>G rs80149580
chr14:51202311 140 69 49.3 NIN Missense 28 p.Gln1934Glu c.5800C>G rs2295847
chr14:92460227 200 98 49.0 TRIP11 Missense 15 p.Glu1696Lys c.5086G>A rs80200454
chr14:92472416 87 48 55.2 TRIP11 Missense 11 p.Ser635Cys c.1904C>G rs59635749
chr15:39880822 330 157 47.6 THBS1 Missense 10 p.Thr523Ala c.1567A>G rs2292305
chr15:40914177 114 54 47.4 CASC5 Missense 10 p.Met572Thr c.1715T>C rs11858113
chr15:40916632 173 78 45.1 CASC5 Missense 10 p.Asp1390Glu c.4170T>A rs141726041
chr15:41805237 149 72 48.3 LTK Missense 2 p.Arg42Gln c.125G>A rs2305030
chr16:15820863 305 305 100.0 MYH11 Missense 29 p.Ala1241Thr c.3721G>A rs16967494
chr18:47800179 147 61 41.5 MBD1 Missense 12 p.Pro401Ala c.1201C>G rs125555
chr18:50832072 125 73 58.4 DCC Missense 13 p.Leu679Arg c.2036T>G rs2271042
chr22:42526694 112 76 67.9 CYP2D6 Missense 1 p.Pro34Ser c.100C>T rs1065852

Notes: DNA was extracted from CD138 negative BM aspirates of this case and peripheral blood of healthy donor 2 (Y.S.) using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) following manufacturer’s instructions. DNA (40 ng) was used for multiplex PCR amplification with an Ion Ampliseq Comprehensive Cancer Panel (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), enabling the targeted coverage of all exons of 409 cancer-related genes in a four tube reaction (covered regions =95.4% of total). Nucleotide variants on the CD138-negative BM aspirates of this case were detected using the peripheral blood of healthy donor-2 as a normal control. A sequencing coverage of 25× and a minimum variant frequency of 15% of the total number of distinct tags were used as cutoffs.

a

dbSNP ID number.

Abbreviations: BM, bone marrow; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

Discussion

MM is a plasma cell malignancy characterized by a heterogeneous clinical course. Treatments for MM have remarkably improved in recent years, due in part to the introduction of novel therapies such as bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide. Despite these advancements, the prognosis of patients with relapse and refractory MM remains poor, and novel therapies are needed. Alternatively, the identification of novel targets or signaling pathways regulating myeloma cell proliferation would improve the clinical outcome and survival of refractory MM patients. Several pathways related to drug resistance and cell survival, such as Notch1, Akt, and NF-κB, are activated to protect MM cells from death.1012 Here, we describe the characterization of genetic abnormalities found in myeloma cells in a patient with refractory MM.

In nonhyperdiploid MM, the IgH gene (14q32) commonly fuses with FGFR3 (4p16), MMSET (4p16.3), CCND3 (6p21), CCND1 (11q13), and MAF (16q23), resulting in the direct or indirect dysregulation of cyclin D.13 Among the nonhyperdiploid myelomas, the hypodiploid subtype (≦44 chromosomes) has the most aggressive clinical phenotype, but the genetic differences between the groups have not been completely defined. Cytogenetic analysis revealed that this patient had a hypodiploid karyotype with 39 chromosomes and complex chromosomal abnormalities, including t(11:14) (q13:q32). CCND1 expression is generally related to copy number aberrations. Although we did not analyze CCND1 mRNA expression, CNV analysis revealed a gain of 11q13–q21, suggesting the presence of cyclin D1 dysregulation.

Several NGS platforms are available for the sequencing of targeted genomic regions to analyze a variety of disease-associated changes, such as point mutations, insertions, deletions, and CNVs. CNV analysis of the sequencing data revealed that this patient had diverse DNA copy number alterations, including large and regional gains and losses (Figure 2B and Table S1). Additionally, we detected eight somatic mutations among 409 cancer-related genes (Table 1). We considered gene sets based on existing insights into the biology of this MM patient. It has been proposed that activation of the NF-kB pathway is important in the pathogenesis of MM, as well as in resistance to chemotherapy. We observed two point mutations and three CNVs affecting NF-κB pathway genes, including IKBKB, CYLD, IKBKE, CD79B, and SYK (Tables 1 and S1). Although additional experiments are required to establish the functional significance of genetic alterations of these genes in MM cells, NF-κB pathway activation may be involved in the molecular pathogenesis of this patient’s disease.

Alterations in the tumor suppressor retinoblastoma (RB) and p53 or their respective pathways are frequently observed in human cancers.14 In MM, a deletion or mutation of p53 (17p13) or RB1 (13q14.2) is considered to be predictive of poor prognosis. We found a monoallelic chromosome 17 deletion and a missense mutation in the DNA-binding domain of p53 (Arg158Gly), suggesting the abrogation of p53 transcription. Moreover, the deletion of the CNV in 13q14.2 was detected in this patient, resulting in the inactivation of two key regulators of the cell cycle, RB1 and p53.

A recent study has described an increased rate of mutations in receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and their associated signaling effectors, pointing to a more potent role of this pathway in MM than was previously appreciated.15 We found two mutations in RTKs, including a missense mutation in ERBB3 and a truncating mutation in EGFR, and have suggested a role of aberrant RTK signaling in the development or progression of MM in this patient. In addition, few studies have addressed the functional roles of the remaining three mutated genes (SYNE1, MYH11, and CDH2) in myeloma, and further investigations are required. SYNE1 is frequently silenced by DNA methylation in primary cancers of the colon and lung,16,17 suggesting that a loss of SYNE1 function may be a genetic event that promotes tumor progression. MYH11 is a member of the myosin family, and inversion at the MYH11 locus is found in acute myeloid leukemia.18 Additionally, MYH11 mutations have been shown to occur in human colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability.19 N-cadherin, encoded by the CDH2 gene, is a transmembrane protein and plays an important role in cell adhesion. Recently, circulating N-cadherin levels was reported to be a negative prognostic factor in patients with MM.20 In this study, we performed comprehensive genomic analyses using PCR target enrichment and semiconductor-based sequencing of matched tumor and normal DNA samples obtained from an individual with refractory MM. We detected several genetic alterations that may have been associated with the poor prognosis and poor response to chemotherapy of this patient. Although its value should be further confirmed in larger samples, targeted NGS is considered a valuable tool for high-throughput genetic testing in clinical research.

Supplementary material

Table S1.

Locus Ploidy Length (bp) Gene
1p36.31(6531783–6532696) 9 913 PLEKHG5
1p36.31(6534071–6534252) 9 181 PLEKHG5
1p36.22(11204731–11317231) 3 112,500 MTOR:MTOR–AS1
1p33(47685376–47838806) 4 153,430 TAL1:CMPK1
1p33p13.2(47840544–114940663) 1 67,100,119 CMPK1:CDKN2C:JUN:JAK1:BCL10:LOC646626:DPYD:DPYD–AS1:TRIM33
1p13.2p12(115006125–120491804) 1 5,485,679 TRIM33:NRAS:NOTCH2
1q21.1(144882848–144922543) 3 39,695 PDE4DIP
1q21.1(144922543–144946743) 1 24,200 PDE4DIP
1q25.3q31.1(185069308–186287597) 1 1,218,289 RNF2:MIR548F1:PRG4:TPR
1q31.1(186287597–186315401) 3 27,804 MIR548F1:TPR
1q31.1(186340019–186645716) 6 305,697 MIR548F1:TPR:PTGS2
1q32.1(204396791–204438963) 3 42,172 PIK3C2B
1q32.1(204494558–204518660) 1 24,102 MDM4
1q32.1(204518660–206652476) 4 2,133,816 MDM4:IKBKE
1q43(237037987–237060883) 5 22,896 MTR
1q44(243776889–243809266) 0 32,377 AKT3
2p25.2(5832763–5833155) 10 392 SOX11
2p25.2p23.3(5833155–24951356) 3 19,118,201 SOX11:MYCN:NCOA1
2p23.3(24952332–24952686) 0 354 NCOA1
2p23.3(24962207–25462090) 4 499,883 NCOA1:DNMT3A
2p21(42509881–47672730) 3 5,162,849 EML4:MSH2
2p21(47672761–47693939) 0 21,178 MSH2
2p21(47698056–47705686) 5 7,630 MSH2
2p16.1p15(61145266–61715462) 1 570,196 REL:XPO1
2q22.1q22.2(141031958–142888394) 3 1,856,436 LRP1B
2q22.3(148657078–148657416) 6 338 ACVR2A
2q31.2q32.2(178096331–190719874) 4 12,623,543 NFE2L2:PMS1
2q33.1(198263157–198266593) 1 3,436 SF3B1
2q33.1(198266665–198274567) 5 7,902 SF3B1
2q33.1q34(198285075–209101941) 4 10,816,866 SF3B1:CREB1:IDH1
2q35q36.1(216288165–223066804) 3 6,778,639 FN1:STK36:PAX3
3p26.2p25.2(3192502–12458385) 1 9,265,883 CRBN:FANCD2:C3orf24:VHL:PPARG RAF1:XPC:TGFBR2:MLH1:ITGA9:MYD88:CTNNB1:LTF:SETD2:BAP1: PBRM1:M
3p25.2p13(12641643–70014401) 1 57,372,758 AGI1:MITF
3p13(71008300–71015133) 0 6,833 FOXP1
3p13(71015133–71247590) 1 232,457 FOXP1
3q22.3q23(138425984–142178221) 4 3,752,237 PIK3CB:FOXL2:ATR
3q23(142180753–142185454) 10 4,701 ATR
3q23(142186790–142226819) 4 40,029 ATR
3q23(142279172–142285045) 4 5,873 ATR
3q26.32q27.3(178916622–187442712) 3 8,526,090 PIK3CA:SOX2–OT:SOX2:LOC100131635:BCL6
3q29(195590930–195622288) 3 31,358 TNK2
4p16.3(1800963–1809006) 3 8,043 FGFR3
4q12q13.1(55987269–62801812) 4 6,814,543 KDR:LPHN3
4q13.1(62863973–62935895) 10 71,922 LPHN3
5q11.2(55259956–55272179) 1 12,223 IL6ST
5q13.1(67522495–67589174) 4 66,679 PIK3R1
5q13.1q22.2(67589211–112111335) 1 44,522,124 PIK3R1:APC
5q22.2(112111335–112176325) 3 64,990 APC
5q31.1q32(131972888–149514586) 3 17,541,698 RAD50:CTNNA1:CSF1R:PDGFRB
5q35.3(176683949–180058790) 3 3,374,841 NSD1:FLT4
6p25.3p22.3(393089–18264237) 5 17,871,148 IRF4:DEK
6p21.32p21.1(32169809–44219786) 4 12,049,977 NOTCH4:DAXX:PIM1:FOXP4:MIR4641:HSP90AB1
6p21.1p12.3(44219786–51720789) 3 7,501,003 HSP90AB1:PKHD1
6p12.3(51720789–51732717) 0 11,928 PKHD1
6p12.3(51732717–51774287) 5 41,570 PKHD1
6p12.2(51882320–51909967) 4 27,647 PKHD1
6p12.2p12.1(52880891–52906053) 7 25,162 ICK
6p12.1(56371186–56373367) 10 2,181 RNU6–71:DST
6p12.1(56373367–56418558) 3 45,191 RNU6–71:DST
6p12.1(56420267–56479190) 4 58,923 RNU6–71:DST
6p12.1(56489295–56505172) 7 15,877 RNU6–71:DST
6q12q252(69348493–152749529) 1 83,401,036 BAI3:MAP3K7:EPHA7:PRDM1:FOXO3:ROS1:SGK1:MYB:TNFAIP3:ESR1: SYNE1
6q25.2(152755037–152762469) 0 7,432 SYNE1
6q25.2q27(152763208–167275671) 1 14,512,463 SYNE1:IGF2R:RPS6KA2
7p22.1(6038830–6048682) 6 9,852 PMS2
7p21.2p112(13978822–55211092) 1 41,232,270 ETV1:IKZF1:EGFR
7p11.2q212(55211092–91632356) 3 36,421,264 EGFR:LOC100507500:SBDS:AKAP9
7q22.1(98478735–98491481) 1 12,746 TRRAP
7q22.1(98491496–98503897) 4 12,401 TRRAP
7q31.2(116398533–116409750) 1 11,217 MET
7q31.2q31.33(116409750–126882846) 3 10,473,096 MET:POT1:GRM8
7q36.1(151873440–151884429) 3 10,989 MLL3
7q36.1(151884429–151896501) 6 12,072 MLL3
8p12(30915961–31015061) 1 99,100 WRN
8p11.21(41801269–41838483) 4 37,214 KAT6A
8q11.21(48761708–48842433) 3 80,725 PRKDC
8q11.21(48848199–48848467) 9 268 PRKDC
8q13.3(71056866–71068855) 4 11,989 NCOA2
8q22.3(103271231–103284984) 4 13,753 UBR5
8q22.3(103287769–103288057) 0 288 UBR5
8q22.3q23.3(103301703–113267690) 3 9,965,987 UBR5:CSMD3
8q23.3(113275800–113326867) 5 51,067 CSMD3
8q23.3(113353734–113697671) 4 343,937 CSMD3
9p24.1(5021975–5055745) 1 33,770 JAK2
9p24.1(5069115–5080629) 0 11,514 JAK2
9p24.1p13.2(5080644–37034041) 1 31,953,397 JAK2:PTPRD:PSIP1:CDKN2A:CDKN2B–AS1:CDKN2B:TAF1L:FANCG:PAX5
9q21.2q22.2(80336237–93607934) 3 13,271,697 GNAQ SYK
10p12.31(21971114–22019887) 4 48,773 MLLT10
10p12.31q24.32(22030804–104155714) 1 82,124,910 MLLT10:RET:MAPK8:NCOA4:TET1:KAT6B:BMPR1A:PTEN:ACTA2:FAS:CY P2C19:BLNK:TLX1
1 0q24.32q26.13(104157967–123353360) 1 19,195,393 NFKB2:SUFU:TCF7L2:FGFR2
11p15.5p15.4(532629–3714618) 3 3,181,989 HRAS:INS–IGF2:IGF2:NUP98
11p15.4(3794886–4144704) 1 349,818 NUP98:RRM1
11p15.4(4147854–4159656) 4 11,802 RRM1
11q13.1q21(64577195–95712842) 3 31,135,647 MEN1:CCND1:NUMA1:MRE11A:MAML2
11q21(95826628–96075072) 6 248,444 MAML2:MIR1260B
11q22.2(102195186–102221298) 3 26,112 BIRC3:BIRC2
11q22.3(108126821–108202634) 3 75,813 ATM
11q22.3(108202640–108205758) 8 3,118 ATM
12p13.32q12(4383139–43825146) 1 39,442,007 CCND2:ING4:ZNF384:KRAS:ADAMTS20
12q12q24.33(43845982–132562299) 1 88,716,317 ADAMTS20:ARID2:MLL2:ATF1:SMUG1:ERBB3:DDIT3:CDK4:MDM2: PTPN11:HNF1A:HCAR1:EP400
13q12.13q14.2(26828777–48881526) 1 22,052,749 CDK8:FLT3:FLT1:FOXO1:RB1
13q14.2(48916694–48955639) 0 38,945 RB1
13q14.2q34(49027105–113976789) 1 64,949,684 RB1:BIVM–ERCC5:ERCC5:IRS2:LAMP1
14q32.12(92435944–92470292) 1 34,348 TRIP11
14q32.2q32.31(99697796–102549592) 4 2,851,796 BCL11B:HSP90AA1
14q32.31q32.33(102568334–105259056) 4 2,690,722 HSP90AA1:AKT1
15q14q15.1(39881158–40914530) 3 1,033,372 THBS1:BUB1B:PAK6:CASC5
15q15.1(40914530–40914946) 8 416 CASC5
15q15.1q21.3(40915027–57574785) 3 16,659,758 CASC5:LTK:TGM7:TCF12
15q26.1(91293154–91304549) 4 11,395 BLM
15q26.1(91306116–91358510) 1 52,394 BLM
16p13.3(2110598–2110873) 7 275 TSC2
16p13.3(2126481–2129066) 8 2,585 TSC2
16p13.3(2129066–3824694) 3 1,695,628 TSC2:CREBBP
16p12.2(23614957–23646619) 1 31,662 PALB2
16p12.2p12.1(23646619–27460675) 3 3,814,056 PALB2:IL21R:LOC283888
16q12.1(50825401–50827575) 0 2,174 CYLD
16q12.1q24.3(50828113–89882998) 1 39,054,885 CYLD:MMP2:CDH1:CDH5:CDH1:MAF:ZNF276:FANCA
17p13.2(5405081–5442941) 4 37,860 NLRP1
17p13.1(8046119–8053735) 5 7,616 PER1
17p13.1(8108179–8111176) 4 2,997 AURKB
17p12q11.2(12016465–29663487) 3 17,647,022 MAP2K4:FLCN:NF1
17q11.2(29663487–29663721) 0 234 NF1
17q11.2(29663721–29684308) 4 20,587 NF1
17q23.3q25.3(62008693–75398324) 4 13,389,631 CD79B:PRKAR1A:SEPT9
17q25.3(78346858–78363051) 3 16,193 RNF213:LOC100294362
19q13.2(42788861–42799411) 0 10,550 CIC
19q13.32q13.43(45252220–57746806) 1 12,494,586 BCL3:MARK4:ERCC2:CD3EAP:ERCC1:PPP2R1A:AURKC
20q12(39708708–40730948) 3 1,022,240 TOP1:PLCG1:PTPRT
21q22.2q22.3(39947501–46330714) 3 6,383,213 ERG:ITGB2
22q11.21(22127160–22153507) 1 26,347 MAPK1
22q11.23(23523722–23524530) 1 808 BCR
22q13.2(41574270–42526792) 4 952,522 EP300:CYP2D6

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Scientific Support Programs for Cancer Research Grant-in-Aid Scientific Research on Innovative Areas Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology. This is the same research abstract number 4424 AACR Annual Meeting Philadelphia 2015.

Footnotes

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Ikeda H, Hideshima T, Fulciniti M, et al. The monoclonal antibody nBT062 conjugated to cytotoxic Maytansinoids has selective cytotoxicity against CD138-positive multiple myeloma cells in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:4028–4037. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Görgün G, Calabrese E, Hideshima T, et al. A novel Aurora-A kinase inhibitor MLN8237 induces cytotoxicity and cell-cycle arrest in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2010;115:5202–5213. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-12-259523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Anderson KC. Therapeutic advances in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11:676–679. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Röllig C, Knop S, Bornhäuser M. Multiple myeloma. Lancet. 2015;385(9983):2197–2208. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60493-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chinen Y. Phosphoinositide protein kinase PDPK1 is a crucial cell signaling mediator in multiple myeloma. Cancer Res. 2014;74:7418–7429. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Görgün G, Calabrese E, Soydan E, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of lenalidomide and pomalidomide on interaction of tumor and bone marrow accessory cells in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2010;116:3227–3237. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-279893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Damerla RR, Chatterjee B, Li Y, Francis RJ, Fatakia SN, Lo CW. Ion Torrent sequencing for conducting genome-wide scans for mutation mapping analysis. Mamm Genome. 2014;3–4:120–128. doi: 10.1007/s00335-013-9494-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Singh RR, Patel KP, Routbort MJ, et al. Clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing screen for mutational hotspots in 46 cancer-related genes. J Mol Diagn. 2013;5:607–622. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chapman MA. Initial genome sequencing and analysis of multiple myeloma. Nature. 2011;471:467–472. doi: 10.1038/nature09837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nefedova Y, Cheng P, Alsina M, et al. Involvement of Notch-1 signaling in bone marrow stroma-mediated de novo drug resistance of myeloma and other malignant lymphoid cell lines. Blood. 2004;103:3503–3510. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-07-2340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hideshima T, Catley L, Raje N, et al. Inhibition of Akt induces significant downregulation of survivin and cytotoxicity in human multiple myeloma cells. Br J Haematol. 2007;138:783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06714.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Markovina S, Callander NS. Bortezomib-resistant nuclear factor-kappa B activity in multiple myeloma cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6:1356–1364. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jimenez-Zepeda VH, Braggio E, Fonseca R, et al. Dissecting karyotypic patterns in non-hyperdiploid multiple myeloma: an overview on the karyotypic evolution. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2013;13:552–558. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2013.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fonseca R, Blood E, Rue M, Harrington D, et al. Clinical and biologic implications of recurrent genomic aberrations in myeloma. Blood. 2003;101:4569–4575. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Leich E, Weißbach S, Klein HU, et al. Multiple myeloma is affected by multiple and heterogeneous somatic mutations in adhesion- and receptor tyrosine kinase signaling molecules. Blood Cancer J. 2013;3:102. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2012.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tessema M, Willink R, Do K, et al. Promoter methylation of genes in and around the candidate lung cancer susceptibility locus 6q23–25. Cancer Res. 2008;68:1707–1714. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schuebel KE, Chen W, Cope L, Glöckner SC, et al. Comparing the DNA hypermethylome with gene mutations in human colorectal cancer. PLoS Genet. 2007;3(9):1709–1723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Castilla LH, Garrett L, Adya N, et al. The fusion gene Cbfb-MYH11 blocks myeloid differentiation and predisposes mice to acute myelo-monocytic leukaemia. Nat Genet. 1999;23(2):144–146. doi: 10.1038/13776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Alhopuro P, Phichith D, Tuupanen S, et al. Unregulated smooth-muscle myosin in human intestinal neoplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(14):5513–5518. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801213105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vandyke K, Chow AW, Williams SA, et al. Circulating N-cadherin levels are a negative prognostic indicator in patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2013;161(4):499–507. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1.

Locus Ploidy Length (bp) Gene
1p36.31(6531783–6532696) 9 913 PLEKHG5
1p36.31(6534071–6534252) 9 181 PLEKHG5
1p36.22(11204731–11317231) 3 112,500 MTOR:MTOR–AS1
1p33(47685376–47838806) 4 153,430 TAL1:CMPK1
1p33p13.2(47840544–114940663) 1 67,100,119 CMPK1:CDKN2C:JUN:JAK1:BCL10:LOC646626:DPYD:DPYD–AS1:TRIM33
1p13.2p12(115006125–120491804) 1 5,485,679 TRIM33:NRAS:NOTCH2
1q21.1(144882848–144922543) 3 39,695 PDE4DIP
1q21.1(144922543–144946743) 1 24,200 PDE4DIP
1q25.3q31.1(185069308–186287597) 1 1,218,289 RNF2:MIR548F1:PRG4:TPR
1q31.1(186287597–186315401) 3 27,804 MIR548F1:TPR
1q31.1(186340019–186645716) 6 305,697 MIR548F1:TPR:PTGS2
1q32.1(204396791–204438963) 3 42,172 PIK3C2B
1q32.1(204494558–204518660) 1 24,102 MDM4
1q32.1(204518660–206652476) 4 2,133,816 MDM4:IKBKE
1q43(237037987–237060883) 5 22,896 MTR
1q44(243776889–243809266) 0 32,377 AKT3
2p25.2(5832763–5833155) 10 392 SOX11
2p25.2p23.3(5833155–24951356) 3 19,118,201 SOX11:MYCN:NCOA1
2p23.3(24952332–24952686) 0 354 NCOA1
2p23.3(24962207–25462090) 4 499,883 NCOA1:DNMT3A
2p21(42509881–47672730) 3 5,162,849 EML4:MSH2
2p21(47672761–47693939) 0 21,178 MSH2
2p21(47698056–47705686) 5 7,630 MSH2
2p16.1p15(61145266–61715462) 1 570,196 REL:XPO1
2q22.1q22.2(141031958–142888394) 3 1,856,436 LRP1B
2q22.3(148657078–148657416) 6 338 ACVR2A
2q31.2q32.2(178096331–190719874) 4 12,623,543 NFE2L2:PMS1
2q33.1(198263157–198266593) 1 3,436 SF3B1
2q33.1(198266665–198274567) 5 7,902 SF3B1
2q33.1q34(198285075–209101941) 4 10,816,866 SF3B1:CREB1:IDH1
2q35q36.1(216288165–223066804) 3 6,778,639 FN1:STK36:PAX3
3p26.2p25.2(3192502–12458385) 1 9,265,883 CRBN:FANCD2:C3orf24:VHL:PPARG RAF1:XPC:TGFBR2:MLH1:ITGA9:MYD88:CTNNB1:LTF:SETD2:BAP1: PBRM1:M
3p25.2p13(12641643–70014401) 1 57,372,758 AGI1:MITF
3p13(71008300–71015133) 0 6,833 FOXP1
3p13(71015133–71247590) 1 232,457 FOXP1
3q22.3q23(138425984–142178221) 4 3,752,237 PIK3CB:FOXL2:ATR
3q23(142180753–142185454) 10 4,701 ATR
3q23(142186790–142226819) 4 40,029 ATR
3q23(142279172–142285045) 4 5,873 ATR
3q26.32q27.3(178916622–187442712) 3 8,526,090 PIK3CA:SOX2–OT:SOX2:LOC100131635:BCL6
3q29(195590930–195622288) 3 31,358 TNK2
4p16.3(1800963–1809006) 3 8,043 FGFR3
4q12q13.1(55987269–62801812) 4 6,814,543 KDR:LPHN3
4q13.1(62863973–62935895) 10 71,922 LPHN3
5q11.2(55259956–55272179) 1 12,223 IL6ST
5q13.1(67522495–67589174) 4 66,679 PIK3R1
5q13.1q22.2(67589211–112111335) 1 44,522,124 PIK3R1:APC
5q22.2(112111335–112176325) 3 64,990 APC
5q31.1q32(131972888–149514586) 3 17,541,698 RAD50:CTNNA1:CSF1R:PDGFRB
5q35.3(176683949–180058790) 3 3,374,841 NSD1:FLT4
6p25.3p22.3(393089–18264237) 5 17,871,148 IRF4:DEK
6p21.32p21.1(32169809–44219786) 4 12,049,977 NOTCH4:DAXX:PIM1:FOXP4:MIR4641:HSP90AB1
6p21.1p12.3(44219786–51720789) 3 7,501,003 HSP90AB1:PKHD1
6p12.3(51720789–51732717) 0 11,928 PKHD1
6p12.3(51732717–51774287) 5 41,570 PKHD1
6p12.2(51882320–51909967) 4 27,647 PKHD1
6p12.2p12.1(52880891–52906053) 7 25,162 ICK
6p12.1(56371186–56373367) 10 2,181 RNU6–71:DST
6p12.1(56373367–56418558) 3 45,191 RNU6–71:DST
6p12.1(56420267–56479190) 4 58,923 RNU6–71:DST
6p12.1(56489295–56505172) 7 15,877 RNU6–71:DST
6q12q252(69348493–152749529) 1 83,401,036 BAI3:MAP3K7:EPHA7:PRDM1:FOXO3:ROS1:SGK1:MYB:TNFAIP3:ESR1: SYNE1
6q25.2(152755037–152762469) 0 7,432 SYNE1
6q25.2q27(152763208–167275671) 1 14,512,463 SYNE1:IGF2R:RPS6KA2
7p22.1(6038830–6048682) 6 9,852 PMS2
7p21.2p112(13978822–55211092) 1 41,232,270 ETV1:IKZF1:EGFR
7p11.2q212(55211092–91632356) 3 36,421,264 EGFR:LOC100507500:SBDS:AKAP9
7q22.1(98478735–98491481) 1 12,746 TRRAP
7q22.1(98491496–98503897) 4 12,401 TRRAP
7q31.2(116398533–116409750) 1 11,217 MET
7q31.2q31.33(116409750–126882846) 3 10,473,096 MET:POT1:GRM8
7q36.1(151873440–151884429) 3 10,989 MLL3
7q36.1(151884429–151896501) 6 12,072 MLL3
8p12(30915961–31015061) 1 99,100 WRN
8p11.21(41801269–41838483) 4 37,214 KAT6A
8q11.21(48761708–48842433) 3 80,725 PRKDC
8q11.21(48848199–48848467) 9 268 PRKDC
8q13.3(71056866–71068855) 4 11,989 NCOA2
8q22.3(103271231–103284984) 4 13,753 UBR5
8q22.3(103287769–103288057) 0 288 UBR5
8q22.3q23.3(103301703–113267690) 3 9,965,987 UBR5:CSMD3
8q23.3(113275800–113326867) 5 51,067 CSMD3
8q23.3(113353734–113697671) 4 343,937 CSMD3
9p24.1(5021975–5055745) 1 33,770 JAK2
9p24.1(5069115–5080629) 0 11,514 JAK2
9p24.1p13.2(5080644–37034041) 1 31,953,397 JAK2:PTPRD:PSIP1:CDKN2A:CDKN2B–AS1:CDKN2B:TAF1L:FANCG:PAX5
9q21.2q22.2(80336237–93607934) 3 13,271,697 GNAQ SYK
10p12.31(21971114–22019887) 4 48,773 MLLT10
10p12.31q24.32(22030804–104155714) 1 82,124,910 MLLT10:RET:MAPK8:NCOA4:TET1:KAT6B:BMPR1A:PTEN:ACTA2:FAS:CY P2C19:BLNK:TLX1
1 0q24.32q26.13(104157967–123353360) 1 19,195,393 NFKB2:SUFU:TCF7L2:FGFR2
11p15.5p15.4(532629–3714618) 3 3,181,989 HRAS:INS–IGF2:IGF2:NUP98
11p15.4(3794886–4144704) 1 349,818 NUP98:RRM1
11p15.4(4147854–4159656) 4 11,802 RRM1
11q13.1q21(64577195–95712842) 3 31,135,647 MEN1:CCND1:NUMA1:MRE11A:MAML2
11q21(95826628–96075072) 6 248,444 MAML2:MIR1260B
11q22.2(102195186–102221298) 3 26,112 BIRC3:BIRC2
11q22.3(108126821–108202634) 3 75,813 ATM
11q22.3(108202640–108205758) 8 3,118 ATM
12p13.32q12(4383139–43825146) 1 39,442,007 CCND2:ING4:ZNF384:KRAS:ADAMTS20
12q12q24.33(43845982–132562299) 1 88,716,317 ADAMTS20:ARID2:MLL2:ATF1:SMUG1:ERBB3:DDIT3:CDK4:MDM2: PTPN11:HNF1A:HCAR1:EP400
13q12.13q14.2(26828777–48881526) 1 22,052,749 CDK8:FLT3:FLT1:FOXO1:RB1
13q14.2(48916694–48955639) 0 38,945 RB1
13q14.2q34(49027105–113976789) 1 64,949,684 RB1:BIVM–ERCC5:ERCC5:IRS2:LAMP1
14q32.12(92435944–92470292) 1 34,348 TRIP11
14q32.2q32.31(99697796–102549592) 4 2,851,796 BCL11B:HSP90AA1
14q32.31q32.33(102568334–105259056) 4 2,690,722 HSP90AA1:AKT1
15q14q15.1(39881158–40914530) 3 1,033,372 THBS1:BUB1B:PAK6:CASC5
15q15.1(40914530–40914946) 8 416 CASC5
15q15.1q21.3(40915027–57574785) 3 16,659,758 CASC5:LTK:TGM7:TCF12
15q26.1(91293154–91304549) 4 11,395 BLM
15q26.1(91306116–91358510) 1 52,394 BLM
16p13.3(2110598–2110873) 7 275 TSC2
16p13.3(2126481–2129066) 8 2,585 TSC2
16p13.3(2129066–3824694) 3 1,695,628 TSC2:CREBBP
16p12.2(23614957–23646619) 1 31,662 PALB2
16p12.2p12.1(23646619–27460675) 3 3,814,056 PALB2:IL21R:LOC283888
16q12.1(50825401–50827575) 0 2,174 CYLD
16q12.1q24.3(50828113–89882998) 1 39,054,885 CYLD:MMP2:CDH1:CDH5:CDH1:MAF:ZNF276:FANCA
17p13.2(5405081–5442941) 4 37,860 NLRP1
17p13.1(8046119–8053735) 5 7,616 PER1
17p13.1(8108179–8111176) 4 2,997 AURKB
17p12q11.2(12016465–29663487) 3 17,647,022 MAP2K4:FLCN:NF1
17q11.2(29663487–29663721) 0 234 NF1
17q11.2(29663721–29684308) 4 20,587 NF1
17q23.3q25.3(62008693–75398324) 4 13,389,631 CD79B:PRKAR1A:SEPT9
17q25.3(78346858–78363051) 3 16,193 RNF213:LOC100294362
19q13.2(42788861–42799411) 0 10,550 CIC
19q13.32q13.43(45252220–57746806) 1 12,494,586 BCL3:MARK4:ERCC2:CD3EAP:ERCC1:PPP2R1A:AURKC
20q12(39708708–40730948) 3 1,022,240 TOP1:PLCG1:PTPRT
21q22.2q22.3(39947501–46330714) 3 6,383,213 ERG:ITGB2
22q11.21(22127160–22153507) 1 26,347 MAPK1
22q11.23(23523722–23524530) 1 808 BCR
22q13.2(41574270–42526792) 4 952,522 EP300:CYP2D6

Articles from OncoTargets and therapy are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES