Skip to main content
FEBS Open Bio logoLink to FEBS Open Bio
. 2015 Sep 25;5:809–812. doi: 10.1016/j.fob.2015.09.007

Study of circulating IgG antibodies to BIRC5 and MYC in non-small cell lung cancer

Leiguang Ye a, Weili Wang b,, Cairen Chen c, Qingyong Meng c, Yan Yu a,
PMCID: PMC4600849  PMID: 26566475

Highlights

  • An in-house ELISA was developed to detect circulating antibodies to peptide antigens.

  • Circulating anti-MYC IgG levels were significantly increased in patients with NSCLC.

  • Neither anti-MYC nor anti-BIRC5 IgG levels significantly changed in early stage NSCLC.

  • Altered anti-MYC IgG levels were observed only in patients with late stage NSCLC.

Abbreviations: cAg, control antigen; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; hAgs, human antigens; NC, negative control; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; OD, optical density; QC, quality control; SBI, specific binding index; TAAs, tumor-associated antigens

Keywords: Lung cancer, BIRC5, MYC, Autoantibodies, ELISA, Tumor immunity

Abstract

An in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed in this study to detect circulating IgG antibodies to peptide antigens derived from baculoviral IAP repeat-containing protein 5 isoform 2 (BIRC5) and myc proto-oncogene protein (MYC) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Student’s t-test revealed that circulating anti-MYC IgG levels were significantly increased in patients with NSCLC compared with control subjects in the discovery sample (= 3.96, = 0.0001) but not in the validation sample (= 1.24, = 0.217), generating a combined P-value of 0.0003. Neither the discovery sample nor the validation sample showed a significant change in anti-BIRC5 IgG levels in NSCLC. Further analysis was performed to investigate whether circulating IgG antibodies to these two tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) significantly changed with early (stages I + II) and late (stages III + IV) NSCLC stages. The results showed that neither anti-MYC IgG nor anti-BIRC5 IgG levels significantly changed in patients with early stage NSCLC, while patients with late stage NSCLC had higher levels of circulating anti-MYC IgG than control subjects in the discovery sample (= 4.74, < 0.0001) but not in the validation sample (= 0.80, = 0.423), generating a combined P-value of 0.00003 (X2 = 26.13, df = 4). In conclusion, circulating IgG antibodies to MYC and BIRC5 do not appear to serve as biomarkers for early diagnosis of lung cancer but anti-MYC IgG might have a prognostic value.

1. Introduction

Lung cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignant tumor and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths for both men and women. An estimated 1.8 million new cases with lung cancer occurred in 2012, accounting for about 13% of total cancer diagnoses worldwide [6,20]. In China, the incidence of lung cancer is approximately 19% of all cancers diagnosed in recent years [2]. Of all lung cancer cases, more than 80% are likely to suffer from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including squamous cell cancer, adenocarcinoma and large cell cancer. Patients with early stage lung cancer may be curable so that there is an urgent need to develop early diagnosis tool for screening of the individuals at a high risk.

It has been suggested that circulating autoantibodies to tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) can serve as potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of malignant tumors [15,19,9,5,12,13]. A successful test has been developed for early diagnosis of lung cancer although the improvement of its sensitivity and specificity remains needed [10,1,7]. Identification of more TAAs will be the solution to enhance the panel positivity in early stage lung cancer. Increased levels of circulating antibodies to survivin, also called baculoviral IAP repeat-containing protein 5 (BIRC5), and to myc proto-oncogene protein (MYC) have been reported in lung cancer [14,8]. A recent study tested the levels circulating IgG against BIRC5 and MYC in breast cancer and revealed that the levels of these two autoantibodies were significantly higher in patients with early stage breast cancer than control subjects [22]. The present study was then designed to detect circulating IgG antibodies to BIRC5 and MYC among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and control subjects in a Chinese population.

2. Methods

2.1. Subjects

A total of 109 patients who were newly diagnosed as having NSCLC were recruited by the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China, in the period between March 2013 and November 2014. Of these 109 patients aged 62.1 ± 10.4 years, 70 were male and 39 were female; they were divided into the discovery samples (n = 49) that were collected during 2013 and the validation samples (n = 60) that were collected during 2014. Their diagnosis and tumor staging were made based on radiographic examination and histological confirmation; inclusion of patients was restricted to those with adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma only. Based on NSCLC staging information, these patients were divided into two subgroups, the early stage group (stages I + II) and the late stage group (stages III + IV). Blood samples were taken prior to any anticancer treatment. A total of 216 healthy subjects, well matched in age (59.1 ± 3.5 years) and smoking history, were also recruited from local communities, 108 of whom were used as controls for the discovery samples and 108 for the validation samples. Clinical interview and radiographic examination were applied to rule out the control subjects who had history of lung cancer or any other malignant tumors. All the subjects were of Chinese Han origin and they all gave informed written consent to participate in this study as approved by the Ethics Committee of the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, and conformed to the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Antibody testing

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed in-house using linear peptide antigens derived from human BIRC5 and MYC proteins as described in a previous study [22]; a peptide fragment derived from a maize protein (NCBI: 1BFA_A) was used as the control antigen (cAg). The sequence information of these three peptides is given in Table 1. Briefly, both hAgs and cAg were synthesized by solid-phase chemistry with purity of >95%, and then applied to develop a relative ELISA test for detection of circulating IgG antibodies to ANXA1 and FOXP3. Synthetic peptides were dissolved in 67% acetic acid to obtain a concentration of 5 mg/ml (stock solution kept at −20 °C), and were diluted with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-based coating buffer (P4417, Sigma–Aldrich) containing 0.1% sodium azide. Coaster 96-Well Microtiter EIA Plates (ImmunoChemistry Technologies, USA) were half-coated in 0.1 ml/well of each hAg and half-coated in 0.1 ml/well of cAg. The antigen-coated 96-well microplate was incubated overnight at 4 °C. After the plate was washed 3 times with wash buffer made from Tris-buffered saline with Tween®20 (T9039, Sigma–Aldrich), 100 μl plasma sample diluted 1:150 in assay buffer (PBS containing 1.5% BSA) was added and 100 μl assay buffer was also added to the negative control (NC) wells. Following 2 h incubation at room temperature, the plate was washed 3 times and 100 μl peroxidase-conjugated goat antibody to human IgG (A8667, Sigma–Aldrich) diluted 1:30,000 in assay buffer was added to each well. After incubation at room temperature for an hour, color development was initiated by adding 100 μl Stabilized Chromogen (SB02, Life Technologies) and terminated 25 min later by adding 50 μl Stop Solution (SS04, Life Technologies). The measurement of the optical density (OD) was completed within 10 min at 450 nm with a reference wavelength of 620 nm. To reduce the interference from a non-specific signal produced by passive absorption of various IgG antibodies in plasma to the surface of 96-well microplate, a specific binding index (SBI) was used to express the levels of circulating antibodies to BIRC5 and MYC. Each sample was tested in duplicate and SBI was calculated as follows:

SBI=(ODhAg-ODNC)/(ODcontrol antigen-ODNC)

.

Table 1.

Information of peptide antigens used for development of ELISA antibody test.

Antigen Sequence (N → C) NCBI accession Working solution (μg/ml)
BIRC5 H-dflkdhristfknwlhhfqglfpgatslpv-OH NP_001012270 10
MYC H-rvkldsvrvlrqisnnrkcfellptpplsps-OH NP_002458 10
Control H-haqlegrlhdlpgcprevqrgfaatlvtn-OH 1BFA_A 10

2.3. Data analysis

Antibody-testing data were expressed in mean ± standard deviation (SD) in SBI. Student’s t-test was applied to examine the difference in SBI between the patient group and the control group, and the Fisher’s method of combining P-value as introduced by Elston [4] was applied to work out combined P-values based on 2 t-tests performed on the discovery samples and the validation samples and on the early stage group and the late stage group.

To minimize intra-assay deviation, the ratio of the difference between duplicated OD values to their sum was used to assess the precision for assay of each sample. If the ratio was found to be >15%, the test of this sample was treated as being invalid and would not be used for data analysis. The inter-assay deviation was estimated using a pooled plasma sample, namely quality control (QC) sample, which was randomly collected from >100 unrelated healthy subjects.

3. Results

Student’s t-test revealed that circulating anti-MYC IgG levels were significantly increased in patients with NSCLC compared with control subjects in the discovery sample (= 3.96, = 0.0001) but not in the validation sample (= 1.24, = 0.217), generating a combined P-value of 0.0003 (X2 = 21.19, df = 4). Neither the discovery sample nor the validation sample showed a significant change in circulating anti-BIRC5 IgG levels in NSCLC (Table 2).

Table 2.

The levels of circulating IgG antibodies to BIRC5 and MYC in NSCLC.

Sample Patient (n) Control (n) t1 P2
Discovery
 BIRC5 0.87 ± 0.14 (49) 0.90 ± 0.42 (108) –0.43 0.665
 MYC 0.86 ± 0.30 (49) 0.72 ± 0.14 (108) 3.96 0.0001



Validation
 BIRC5 0.78 ± 0.19 (60) 0.77 ± 0.37 (108) 0.13 0.894
 MYC 0.90 ± 0.27 (60) 0.86 ± 0.16 (108) 1.24 0.217

The antibody levels are expressed as mean ± SD in SBI.

1

Student’s t-test (two-tailed).

2

Combining probabilities: X2 = 1.04, df = 4, = 0.904 for anti- BIRC5 IgG levels and X2 = 21.19, df = 4, = 0.0003 for anti-MYC IgG levels.

As shown in Table 3, neither anti-MYC IgG nor anti-BIRC5 IgG levels significantly changed in the patients with early stage NSCLC whereas patients with late stage NSCLC had higher levels of circulating anti-MYC IgG than control subjects in the discovery sample (= 4.74, < 0.0001) but not in the validation sample (= 0.80, = 0.423), generating a combined P-value of 0.00003 (X2 = 26.13, df = 4). Neither the discovery sample nor the validation sample showed a significant change in circulating anti-BIRC5 IgG levels in late stage NSCLC (Table 4).

Table 3.

The levels of circulating IgG antibodies to BIRC5 and MYC in early stage NSCLC.

Sample Patient (n) Control (n) t1 P2
Discovery
 BIRC5 0.87 ± 0.16 (15) 0.90 ± 0.42 (108) –0.21 0.832
 MYC 0.74 ± 0.12 (15) 0.72 ± 0.14 (108) 0.49 0.623



Validation
 BIRC5 0.75 ± 0.14 (21) 0.77 ± 0.37 (108) –0.21 0.834
 MYC 0.92 ± 0.12 (21) 0.86 ± 0.16 (108) 1.56 0.120

The antibody levels are expressed as mean ± SD in SBI.

1

Student’s t-test (two-tailed).

2

Combining probabilities: X2 = 0.73, df = 4, = 0.947 for anti-BIRC5 IgG levels and X2 = 5.19, df = 4, = 0.269 for anti-MYC IgG levels.

Table 4.

The levels of circulating IgG antibodies to BIRC5 and MYC in late stage NSCLC.

Sample Patient (n) Control (n) t1 P2
Discovery
 BIRC5 0.87 ± 0.13 (34) 0.90 ± 0.42 (108) –0.38 0.702
 MYC 0.90 ± 0.34 (34) 0.72 ± 0.14 (108) 4.74 <0.0001



Validation
 BIRC5 0.79 ± 0.21 (39) 0.77 ± 0.37 (108) 0.32 0.752
 MYC 0.89 ± 0.32 (39) 0.86 ± 0.16 (108) 0.80 0.423

The antibody levels are expressed as mean ± SD in SBI.

1

Student’s t-test (two-tailed).

2

Combining probabilities: X2 = 1.28, df = 4, = 0.865 for anti-BIRC5 IgG levels and X2 = 26.13, df = 4, = 0.00003 for anti-MYC IgG levels.

4. Discussion

This study suggests that circulating anti-MYC IgG instead of anti-BIRC5 IgG levels were significantly increased in NSCLC (Table 2), but the altered anti-MYC IgG levels were observed only in patients with late stage NSCLC (Table 4). Whether circulating antibodies to TAAs can be used to develop early diagnostic tool for lung cancer remains in debate although some of them may have a prognostic value.

The MYC protein is a transcription factor and plays a role in cell cycle progression, apoptosis and cellular transformation. The mutation of the MYC gene has been found in many cancers, leading to its persistent expression that can then regulate the expression of many genes involved in cell proliferation and resulting in the formation of cancer. Studies of MYC showed that there was an increase in MYC expression in NSCLC [16] and increased MYC expression was related to poor prognosis of the malignancy [11]. A question is what is the biological significance of increased anti-MYC antibody levels in NSCLC? It is possible that increased anti-MYC IgG levels may be protective against the role of MYC in the development of lung cancer. While the mechanism behind the increased anti-MYC IgG levels in NSCLC is unknown, humoral immune responses to TAAs may be induced by a self-immunization process linked to increased immunogenicity of MYC during malignant transformation, including antigen mutation [18], overexpression [3], altered antigen folding [17] and aberrant degradation [21]. Further investigation will clarify the complicated mechanism involved in triggering the secretion of anti-MYC IgG antibodies in lung cancer.

5. Conclusion

Circulating IgG antibodies to MYC and BIRC5 do not appear to serve as biomarkers for early diagnosis of lung cancer although anti-MYC IgG may have a prognostic value.

Conflict of interest

All the authors declared that they had no conflict of interest.

Authors’ contributions

WW and YY conceived of the study, recruited patients and corrected the manuscript; LY and CC performed all laboratory work and drafted the manuscript; QM was mainly involved in supervising lab work, data analysis and proofreading. All authors read the final version of the manuscript and approved the submission.

Acknowledgements

We thank all the patients and control subjects for their participation in this study. This work was supported by Hailanshen Biomedical Technology Ltd, Shenzhen, China.

Contributor Information

Weili Wang, Email: wwl822@163.com.

Yan Yu, Email: yuyan@ems.hrbmu.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Chapman C.J., Healey G.F., Murray A., Boyle P., Robertson C., Peek L.J., Allen J., Thorpe A.J., Hamilton-Fairley G., Parsy-Kowalska C.B., MacDonald I.K., Jewell W., Maddison P., Robertson J.F. EarlyCDT®-Lung test: improved clinical utility through additional autoantibody assays. Tumour Biol. 2012;33:1319–1326. doi: 10.1007/s13277-012-0379-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen W., Zheng R., Zhang S., Zhao P., Li G., Wu L., He J. The incidences and mortalities of major cancers in China, 2009. Chin. J. Cancer. 2013;32:106–112. doi: 10.5732/cjc.013.10018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen Y.T., Scanlan M.J., Sahin U., Türeci O., Gure A.O., Tsang S., Williamson B., Stockert E., Pfreundschuh M., Old L.J. A testicular antigen aberrantly expressed in human cancers detected by autologous antibody screening. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997;94:1914–1918. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.5.1914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Elston R.C. On Fisher’s method of combining p-values. Biom. J. 1991;33:339–345. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Järås K., Anderson K. Autoantibodies in cancer: prognostic biomarkers and immune activation. Expert. Rev. Proteomics. 2011;8:577–589. doi: 10.1586/epr.11.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jemal A., Bray F., Center M.M., Ferlay J., Ward E., Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jett J.R., Peek L.J., Fredericks L., Jewell W., Pingleton W.W., Robertson J.F. Audit of the autoantibody test, EarlyCDT®-lung, in 1600 patients: an evaluation of its performance in routine clinical practice. Lung Cancer. 2014;83:51–55. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Karanikas V., Khalil S., Kerenidi T., Gourgoulianis K.I., Germenis A.E. Anti-survivin antibody responses in lung cancer. Cancer Lett. 2009;282:159–166. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kobold S., Lütkens T., Cao Y., Bokemeyer C., Atanackovic D. Autoantibodies against tumor-related antigens: incidence and biologic significance. Hum. Immunol. 2010;71:643–651. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2010.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lam S., Boyle P., Healey G.F., Maddison P., Peek L., Murray A., Chapman C.J., Allen J., Wood W.C., Sewell H.F., Robertson J.F.R. EarlyCDT-Lung: an immunobiomarker test as an aid to early detection of lung cancer. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila) 2011;4:1126–1134. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lin T.C., Lin P.L., Cheng Y.W., Wu T.C., Chou M.C., Chen C.Y., Lee H. MicroRNA-184 deregulated by the MicroRNA-21 promotes tumor malignancy and poor outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer via targeting CDC25A and c-Myc. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2015 doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4595-z. (Epub ahead of print) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu W., Peng B., Lu Y., Xu W., Qian W., Zhang J.-Y. Autoantibodies to tumor-associated antigens as biomarkers in cancer immunodiagnosis. Autoimmun. Rev. 2011;10:331–335. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2010.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ludwig N., Keller A., Leidinger P., Harz C., Backes C., Lenhof H.P., Meese E. Is there a general autoantibody signature for cancer? Eur. J. Cancer. 2012;48 doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.01.017. 2451-261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Megliorino R., Shi F.D., Peng X.X., Wang X., Chan E.K., Tan E.M., Zhang J.Y. Autoimmune response to anti-apoptotic protein survivin and its association with antibodies to p53 and c-myc in cancer detection. Cancer Detect. Prev. 2005;29:241–248. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Reuschenbach M., von Knebel Doeberitz M., Wentzensen N. A systematic review of humoral immune responses against tumor antigens. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2009;58:1535–1544. doi: 10.1007/s00262-009-0733-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Salmaninejad A., Estiar M.A., Gill R.K., Shih J.H., Hewitt S., Jeon H.S., Fukuoka J., Shilo K., Shakoori A., Jen J. Expression analysis of p16, c-Myc, and mSin3A in non-small cell lung cancer by Computer Aided Scoring and Analysis (CASA) Clin. Lab. 2015;61:549–559. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2014.141125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schubert U., Antón L.C., Gibbs J., Norbury C.C., Yewdell J.W., Bennink J.R. Rapid degradation of a large fraction of newly synthesized proteins by proteasomes. Nature. 2000;404:770–774. doi: 10.1038/35008096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Soussi T. TP53 mutations in human cancer: database reassessment and prospects for the next decade. Adv. Cancer Res. 2011;110:107–139. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386469-7.00005-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tan H.T., Low J., Lim S.G., Chung M.C. Serum autoantibodies as biomarkers for early cancer detection. FEBS J. 2009;276:6880–6904. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07396.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Torre L.A., Bray F., Siegel R.L., Ferlay J., Lortet-Tieulent J., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA. Cancer J. Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ulanet D.B., Torbenson M., Dang C.V., Casciola-Rosen L., Rosen A. Unique conformation of cancer autoantigen B23 in hepatoma: a mechanism for specificity in the autoimmune response. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003;100:12361–12366. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2035245100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xu Y., Jin Y., Liu L., Zhang X., Chen Y., Wei J. Study of circulating IgG antibodies to peptide antigens derived from BIRC5 and MYC in cervical cancer. FEBS Open Bio. 2015;5:198–201. doi: 10.1016/j.fob.2015.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from FEBS Open Bio are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES