Aeromonas hydrophila is a rod-shaped, gram-negative bacterium typical of the aquatic environment that is also found in drinking water, wastewater, sewage, and food.1,2 It is considered as an emerging pathogen responsible not only for gastroenteritis and skin infections, but also for more systemic conditions such as peritonitis, bacteremia, meningitis, cholera-like illness, hemolytic uremic syndrome, and necrotizing fasciitis.3-6 A. hydrophila strains isolated in areas hit by natural disasters such as hurricanes and tsunamis have been associated with skin and soft-tissue infections.7 A. hydrophila is also a well-established fish pathogen involved in a range of diseases, including motile aeromonad septicemia in carp, tilapia, perch, catfish, and salmon; red sore disease in bass and carp; and ulcerative infections like epizootic ulcerative syndrome in catfish, cod, carp, and goby.2 The pathogenesis of Aeromonas infection is complex and multifactorial; it includes O-antigens, capsules, lipopolysaccharide,8,9 the S-layer,10 a single, polar flagellum expressed constitutively, lateral inducible flagella, and iron-binding systems;11 with regard to extracellular products it encompasses hemolysins and enterotoxins,12 including the cytotoxic enterotoxin (Act), which is a substrate for type 2 secretion system (T2SS),13 and enzymes such as proteases, amylases, lipases, ADP-ribosyltransferases, and DNases.14 A. hydrophila also possesses a functional T3SS that delivers 4 effector proteins into target host cells, and a T6SS-associated virulence factors that is both an injectisome, like T3SS, and a secretory apparatus promoting bacterial virulence.15
Despite the demonstration of its high pathogenic potential, A. hydrophila survival and multiplication strategies against the host's immune system have not been fully elucidated. It has been shown that neutrophils, mast cells, eosinophils, and macrophages can release extracellular traps (ETs) consisting of a DNA backbone stabilized by histones, antimicrobial molecules, and proteases. The main function of ETs is to block and to kill the pathogen at the site of infection, thus limiting its spread in the infected organism.16-18 Such ability of entrapping and killing bacteria may be conferred by an electrostatic interaction between their positive charge and the negative charge of the bacterial surface19 and by proteins from granules such elastase, myeloperoxidase, cathepsin G, lactoferrin and gelatinase.17
However, some pathogens escape ETs by producing DNases that destroy the DNA backbone.20,21 Despite reports of ET formation in fish,22 little is known about the ability of A. hydrophila to evade the host's immune defense. In the current issue of Virulence, Yachan Ji and colleagues23 reported the involvement of nucleases in A. hydrophila pathogenesis in both murine and fish models using an A. hydrophila mutant carrying a nuclease (ahn) deletion. Their results show that Ahn inactivation significantly impairs the ability of A. hydrophila to escape killing by the host's immune system, demonstrating the involvement of the nuclease in systemic dissemination.
These findings provide an important contribution to the current knowledge of A. hydrophila pathogenicity linked to ET production by immune system cells, and suggest that this could be a general mechanism of invasion that may be not be confined to fish, but also involve different hosts including humans.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
References
- 1.Janda JM. Abbott SL. The genus Aeromonas: taxonomy, pathogenicity, and infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23:35–73; PMID:20065325; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/CMR.00039-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Holmes P, Niccolls LM, Sartory DP. The ecology of mesophilic Aeromonas in the aquatic environment In The genus Aeromonas. Austin B, Altwegg M, Gosling PJ, Joseph S (ed.), West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd;1996. p. 127-150 [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brouqui P, Raoult D. Endocarditis due to rare and fastidious bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001; 14:177-207; PMID:11148009; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/CMR.14.1.177-207.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chang CY, Thompson H, Rodman N, Bylander J, Thomas J. Pathogenic analysis of Aeromonas hydrophila septicemia. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1997; 27:254-259; PMID:9210970 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Reines HD, Cook FV. Pneumonia and bacteremia due to Aeromonas hydrophila. Chest 1981; 80:264-267; PMID:7273876; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1378/chest.80.3.264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chern CH, How CK, Huang LJ. Images in emergency medicine. Necrotizing fasciitis caused by Aeromonas hydrophila. Ann Emerg Med 2006; 48:216-225; PMID:16857472; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hiransuthikul N, Tantisiriwat W, Lertutsahakul K, Vibhagool A, Boonma P. Skin and soft-tissue infections among tsunami survivors in southern Thailand. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41:93-6; PMID:16231248; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1086/497372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Merino S, Rubires X, Aguilar A, Guillot JF, Tomás JM. The role of the O-antigen lipopolysaccharide on the colonization in vivo of the germfree chicken gut by Aeromonas hydrophila serogroup O:34. Microb Pathog 1996; 20:325-33; PMID:8831828; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1006/mpat.1996.0031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang YL, Arakawa E, Leung KY. Novel Aeromonas hydrophila PPD134/91 genes involved in O-antigen and capsule biosynthesis. Infect Immun 2002; 70: 2326-35; PMID:11953367; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/IAI.70.5.2326-2335.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dooley JSG, Trust TJ. Surface protein composition of Aeromonas hydrophila strains virulent for fish: identification of a surface array protein. J Bacteriol 1988; 170:499-506; PMID:3276660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tomàs JM. The Main Aeromonas Pathogenic Factors. ISRN Microbiol 2012; 4:256261; PMID:23724321; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5402/2012/256261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Allan BJ, Stevenson RM. Extracellular virulence factors of Aeromonas hydrophila in fish infections. Can J Microbiol 1981; 27:1114-1122; PMID:7032678; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1139/m81-174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chopra AK, Houston CW. Enterotoxins in Aeromonas associated gastroenteritis. Microbes Infect 1999; 1:1129-1137; PMID:10572317; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S1286-4579(99)00202-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vilches S, Wilhelms M, Yu HB, Leung KY, Tomas JM, Merino S. Aeromonas hydrophila AH-3 AexT is an ADP-ribosylating toxin secreted through the type III secretion system. Microb Pathog 2008; 44:1-12; PMID:17689917; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.micpath.2007.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rosenzweig JA, Chopra AK. Modulation of host immune defenses by Aeromonas and Yersinia species: convergence on toxins secreted by various secretion systems. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2013; 3:70; PMID:24199174; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Goldmann O, Medina E. The expanding world of extracellular traps: not only neutrophils but much more. Front Immunol 2013; 3:420; PMID:23335924; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, Weinrauch Y, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science 2004; 303:1532-1535; PMID:15001782; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1092385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Urban CF, Ermert D, Schmid M, Abu-Abed U, Goosmann C, Nacken W, Brinkmann V, Jungblut PR, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil extracellular traps contain calprotectin, a cytosolic protein complex involved in host defense against Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog 2009; 5(10):e1000639; PMID:19876394; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A. Beneficial suicide:why neutrophils die to make NETs. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007; 5:577-582; PMID:17632569; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrmicro1710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Buchanan JT, Simpson AJ, Aziz RK, Liu GY, Kristian SA, Kotb M, et al.. DNase expression allows the pathogen group A Streptococcus to escape killing in neutrophil extracellular traps. Curr Biol 2006; 16:396-400; PMID:16488874; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cub.2005.12.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Berends ET, Horswill AR, Haste NM, Monestier M, Nizet V, von Kockritz-Blickwede M. Nuclease expression by Staphylococcus aureus facilitate esescape from neutrophil extracellular. J Innate Immun 2010; 2(6):576-86; PMID:20829609; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1159/000319909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brogden G, Krimmling T, Adamek M, Naim HY, Steinhagen D, von Köckritz-Blickwede M. The effect of b-glucan on formation and functionality of neutrophil extracellular traps in carp (Cyprinuscarpio L.). Dev Comparat Immunol 2014; 44:280-285; PMID:24434196; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.dci.2014.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yachan J, Jinquan L, Zhendong Q, Aihua L, Zemao G, Xiaoling L, Li L, Yang Z. Contribution of nuclease to the pathogenesis of Aeromonas hydrophila. Virulence 2015; PMID:26039879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]